WEBVTT

00:00:37.040 --> 00:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast.</v>

00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I am Cory J.</v>

00:00:40.720 --> 00:00:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Mahler. And</v>

00:00:41.840 --> 00:00:45.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm still Woe.</v>

00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>On today's episode of Stone Choir, we're going to be discussing the</v>

00:00:48.720 --> 00:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>famous twentieth century theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer.</v>

00:00:53.120 --> 00:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting when you call Dietrich von Hoffer famous because he wasn't</v>

00:00:56.960 --> 00:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>really famous as a theologian until the twenty first century.</v>

00:01:00.880 --> 00:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>That's something we'll get into a little bit, but it's just this</v>

00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is one of the episodes that we're doing because yet again, he</v>

00:01:08.080 --> 00:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>is a sacred cow.</v>

00:01:09.600 --> 00:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>He's really, in fact, a golden calf of twentieth century global religion.</v>

00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:18.960
<v Speaker 3>And And it is consistent with many of the themes that we've</v>

00:01:18.960 --> 00:01:20.480
<v Speaker 3>hit in the past year.</v>

00:01:20.480 --> 00:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>A couple brief notes up front before we get into this particular</v>

00:01:24.720 --> 00:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>subject. One, this is a continuation of a number of previous episodes,</v>

00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>so if you happen to be listening to Stonequire for the very</v>

00:01:32.160 --> 00:01:35.760
<v Speaker 3>first time with this particular episode, we would actually recommend that you</v>

00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>go back to a couple of earlier ones.</v>

00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Um in particular, the Martin Luther King R Cheritech episode, part one</v>

00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of two about MLK, is really part one of this episode as</v>

00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>well. Uh one of the points that we're going to be making</v>

00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in this episode is that MLK and Bonhoeffer effectively had the same</v>

00:01:55.600 --> 00:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>spiritual fathers, they had the same teachers, the same readings, and they</v>

00:02:00.960 --> 00:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>had the same message.</v>

00:02:02.240 --> 00:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>The difference between them was really just about 50 IQ points.</v>

00:02:05.760 --> 00:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>So the things that MLK was too stupid not to say out</v>

00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>loud, Bon Offer was perfectly content to say them.</v>

00:02:12.960 --> 00:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>The difference is that Bonhoffer would say him in a subtle way</v>

00:02:15.600 --> 00:02:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that so that if you already think he's a decent Christian guy,</v>

00:02:18.880 --> 00:02:21.920
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna be able to baptize what it is he says without</v>

00:02:21.920 --> 00:02:23.360
<v Speaker 3>too much trouble.</v>

00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Another episode that this ties into is one of the early ones</v>

00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:29.360
<v Speaker 3>on the clarity of scripture and some of the World War II</v>

00:02:29.360 --> 00:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff. We're not really going to get into it beyond just a</v>

00:02:31.600 --> 00:02:35.840
<v Speaker 3>couple superficial details, but the But the context of it is in</v>

00:02:35.840 --> 00:02:39.280
<v Speaker 3>view of the three-part episode that we or three-part series that we</v>

00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>recently concluded on the Jews.</v>

00:02:41.680 --> 00:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to assume that you have listened to those as</v>

00:02:46.320 --> 00:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about this.</v>

00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:50.720
<v Speaker 3>All our episodes stand alone, but this one in particular, one of</v>

00:02:50.720 --> 00:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the things that's concerned Corey and myself as we've been looking to</v>

00:02:53.920 --> 00:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>tackle this subject is that because Bonhoeffer was really smart and he</v>

00:02:58.960 --> 00:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>was really subtle.</v>

00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>It's tough to make the case that he was evil, because you</v>

00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>can superficially read some of the things that he says out of</v>

00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>context and say, oh yeah, I can I can agree with that.</v>

00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I can believe that.</v>

00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact it's interesting there were a number of things that when</v>

00:03:15.760 --> 00:03:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I was reading, particularly in some of his letters from prison from</v>

00:03:18.640 --> 00:03:21.760
<v Speaker 3>nineteen forty three and forty four after he was under arrest for</v>

00:03:21.760 --> 00:03:25.920
<v Speaker 3>treason. A number of the things that he said, the Bonhoeffer was</v>

00:03:25.920 --> 00:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>saying at the end of his life sounded sounded very much like</v>

00:03:28.880 --> 00:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the things that Corey and I say on Stone Choir.</v>

00:03:31.280 --> 00:03:33.920
<v Speaker 3>There's some of the things that are really a big part of</v>

00:03:33.920 --> 00:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>what we try to get across on this podcast series.</v>

00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:41.680
<v Speaker 3>The reason that's so fascinating is that the men, the pastors, who</v>

00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>hate us the most</v>

00:03:43.440 --> 00:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>love Bon Offer.</v>

00:03:45.600 --> 00:03:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So I just found it interesting I was reading some of those</v>

00:03:47.680 --> 00:03:51.360
<v Speaker 3>quotes, like, why wouldn't they hear his voice in the things that</v>

00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:52.080
<v Speaker 3>we're saying?</v>

00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>And the reason is we're coming from completely opposite directions as we</v>

00:03:55.600 --> 00:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>talk about those things.</v>

00:03:56.640 --> 00:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So we'll get into a few of those in a bit, but</v>

00:03:58.320 --> 00:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just I found it very interesting that we have completely different</v>

00:04:01.280 --> 00:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>spirits and yet in some cases have very similar specific words for</v>

00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>things, specific concerns about things.</v>

00:04:09.840 --> 00:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>We have very different solutions because we have very different origins for</v>

00:04:13.920 --> 00:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the the concerns themselves.</v>

00:04:17.840 --> 00:04:20.320
<v Speaker 3>So as we get into this, I want to</v>

00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>tie back into the historical context of the man.</v>

00:04:24.640 --> 00:04:29.280
<v Speaker 3>As I said, he's considered to be a 20th century preeminent theologian</v>

00:04:29.280 --> 00:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that almost nobody knew about in the 20th century.</v>

00:04:31.920 --> 00:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I did a search on Google N grams as I often do</v>

00:04:34.640 --> 00:04:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and we've mentioned a number of times in the past.</v>

00:04:36.720 --> 00:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>You can do a search for a word and see how frequently</v>

00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>it pops up in literature and in magazines and other things.</v>

00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer's name didn't appear really until the early sixties.</v>

00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Basically, you can plot the curve of Vatican II and the plot</v>

00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>of Bonhoeffer, and in the 60s they take off on identical curves.</v>

00:04:56.320 --> 00:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>And I firmly believe that that was the birth of a new</v>

00:04:59.120 --> 00:05:00.160
<v Speaker 3>world religion.</v>

00:05:00.160 --> 00:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>One of the striking things when you're reading about the history of</v>

00:05:03.200 --> 00:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer introspection by other theologians is how widely he's viewed as a</v>

00:05:09.760 --> 00:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>man for all denominations, a man that the liberals love and the</v>

00:05:13.760 --> 00:05:14.800
<v Speaker 3>conservatives love.</v>

00:05:14.800 --> 00:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's really weird because that's not really how Christian theology usually</v>

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:25.440
<v Speaker 3>works. Like when f when sound doctrine is paramount in the discussion</v>

00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>in the church, usually you have people that are on opposing sides</v>

00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:31.040
<v Speaker 3>because some of them just don't believe the Bible.</v>

00:05:31.040 --> 00:05:34.720
<v Speaker 3>And so the fact that the ultra-libs and people who think they're</v>

00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 3>conservative both see this man as their saint is very interesting.</v>

00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:41.840
<v Speaker 3>And then the timing of Vatican II, I was just it made</v>

00:05:41.840 --> 00:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>me laugh, like, well yeah, of course that would happen.</v>

00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>And then it sort of died off the interest in Bonhoeffer until</v>

00:05:47.200 --> 00:05:48.160
<v Speaker 3>this century.</v>

00:05:48.160 --> 00:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>It was until the beginning of the twenty first century that he</v>

00:05:51.040 --> 00:05:52.720
<v Speaker 3>really became very popular.</v>

00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>And so just to begin, I'm going to give a couple brief</v>

00:05:55.040 --> 00:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>quotes. These are from Christian News, uh, which was a publication from</v>

00:05:59.200 --> 00:06:00.720
<v Speaker 3>a Lutheran pastor</v>

00:06:01.600 --> 00:06:03.360
<v Speaker 3>that it was around for decades.</v>

00:06:03.360 --> 00:06:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh, he was a man who long went after some of these</v>

00:06:06.640 --> 00:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>subjects when the rest of the world was kind of ignoring them.</v>

00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:13.280
<v Speaker 3>This is a description that I'm gonna read, and I'm gonna read</v>

00:06:13.280 --> 00:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>uh a brief description of an event that took place at our</v>

00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:20.720
<v Speaker 3>one of our seminaries in two thousand six.</v>

00:06:20.720 --> 00:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Dietrich Bonhoeffer was one of the authentic heroes of World War II,</v>

00:06:25.200 --> 00:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a German Protestant theologian who spoke out furiously against Hitler and participated</v>

00:06:30.080 --> 00:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>in an assassination plot against him.</v>

00:06:32.320 --> 00:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer was hanged on Hitler's orders three weeks before the Nazi dictator</v>

00:06:36.240 --> 00:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>committed suicide on the eve of Germany's surrender in April 1945.</v>

00:06:40.640 --> 00:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's probably the bulk of what most people know about</v>

00:06:44.320 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 3>the man.</v>

00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:50.800
<v Speaker 3>He was a German pastor, he fought Hitler, he was hanged for</v>

00:06:50.960 --> 00:06:52.480
<v Speaker 3>attempting to kill him.</v>

00:06:52.480 --> 00:06:54.160
<v Speaker 3>And then he wrote some stuff.</v>

00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's pretty much all people know.</v>

00:06:56.080 --> 00:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>The reason I wanted to begin there is that it's the new</v>

00:06:58.480 --> 00:06:59.840
<v Speaker 3>World War II thing.</v>

00:06:59.840 --> 00:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>It's subtly he doesn't it's not mentioned here, but it's about the</v>

00:07:03.200 --> 00:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Jews. The third episode that we did in the series on the</v>

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Jews is part of this.</v>

00:07:07.200 --> 00:07:11.200
<v Speaker 3>So again, that's why I said that this episode is it it's</v>

00:07:11.200 --> 00:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of a final quiz for a lot of what Stone Choir</v>

00:07:14.160 --> 00:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>has done previously.</v>

00:07:15.360 --> 00:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I hope that we succeed today because as I said, this is</v>

00:07:17.840 --> 00:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a hard case to make once you get into the really</v>

00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>subtle things he says.</v>

00:07:22.960 --> 00:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>So just consider this the framing.</v>

00:07:25.440 --> 00:07:28.640
<v Speaker 3>This is the man who fought the Nazis and fought Hitler and</v>

00:07:28.640 --> 00:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>he was martyred for it.</v>

00:07:30.880 --> 00:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>In two thousand six there was a Bonhoeff conference at the Concordia</v>

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Saint Louis Seminary of the LCMS began july nineteenth through the twenty</v>

00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>first. Quote Dietrich Bonhoeffer may well be the most widely admired and</v>

00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>respected Christian theologian among Christian pastors and theologians in the USA.</v>

00:07:50.960 --> 00:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>The scope of his appeal is exceptionally broad, spanning across virtually all</v>

00:07:55.280 --> 00:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Christian denominations and across perspectives ranging from the traditional to the liberal.</v>

00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:04.640
<v Speaker 3>His centennial offers a unique opportunity for activities that highlight the many</v>

00:08:04.640 --> 00:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>remarkable aspects of his theology and life.</v>

00:08:07.760 --> 00:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>This conference features nationally and internationally recognized experts on Bonhoeffer.</v>

00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>These include Lutherans and members of other church bodies.</v>

00:08:15.920 --> 00:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>There will be emphasis on confessional Lutheran aspects of Bonhoeffer's thought, and</v>

00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:23.200
<v Speaker 3>at the same time presentations from other Christian perspectives.</v>

00:08:23.280 --> 00:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a unique opportunity for Lutherans to highlight perhaps the most important</v>

00:08:27.280 --> 00:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Lutheran theologian since Martin Luther, and to converse about the contributions Bonhoeffer</v>

00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>can make to the life of the 21st century church.</v>

00:08:37.120 --> 00:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Now that's remarkable 'cause I said, like, in the twentieth century he</v>

00:08:40.880 --> 00:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>wasn't really discussed.</v>

00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>He was he was a footnote.</v>

00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>He was one guy, didn't do anything that significant.</v>

00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>He was notable because he was one of the few people in</v>

00:08:49.200 --> 00:08:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the church who committed treason against the German government and was executed</v>

00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:54.960
<v Speaker 3>for it.</v>

00:08:54.960 --> 00:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So the reason we're talking about him today, the reason that you've</v>

00:08:58.160 --> 00:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>ever heard the name is because of that, because he fought Hitler</v>

00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>and because everybody loves him, whether they're libs or conservatives.</v>

00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:08.320
<v Speaker 3>In fact the reason I mentioned Vatican two, the reason I searched</v>

00:09:08.320 --> 00:09:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for that, was that even Roman Catholics really loved Bonhoeffer in the</v>

00:09:11.680 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>sixties. That's crazy.</v>

00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>if here's this Lutheran pastor, this Lutheran theologian from the liberal wing</v>

00:09:19.440 --> 00:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>in German theology, and Roman Catholics like, yeah, that's our guy.</v>

00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Something's going on here.</v>

00:09:24.800 --> 00:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>And then when you have the most conservative Lutherans saying the same</v>

00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:31.040
<v Speaker 3>thing Something really weird is happening.</v>

00:09:31.040 --> 00:09:33.280
<v Speaker 3>This is not what normally happens in the church.</v>

00:09:33.280 --> 00:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to begin looking at some of the things that</v>

00:09:35.360 --> 00:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>he wrote in the past to see who was this man.</v>

00:09:37.920 --> 00:09:41.520
<v Speaker 3>If this is a great theologian, a great contributor to the Christian</v>

00:09:41.520 --> 00:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>tradition, let's see what he had to say about the Christian faith.</v>

00:09:45.680 --> 00:09:45.840
I

00:09:45.840 --> 00:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>guess before we move into some of the quotes properly and going</v>

00:09:49.600 --> 00:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>over some of the things that he wrote, it really is almost</v>

00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>amazing, really, that they would call him the most important Lutheran theologian</v>

00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>since Martin Luther.</v>

00:10:01.040 --> 00:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>That's really a true slight to Chemnitz.</v>

00:10:04.640 --> 00:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>For those who don't know, Martin Chemnitz is often called the second</v>

00:10:08.640 --> 00:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Martin, and one of the sayings about him I won't use the</v>

00:10:11.680 --> 00:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Latin because there's no reason is essentially Luther the first Martin would</v>

00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>not have survived if not for Chemnitz II Martin, that's how important</v>

00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:27.440
<v Speaker 2>he was as a theologian to the church.</v>

00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And yet we're supposed to believe that Bonhoeffer is</v>

00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:36.560
<v Speaker 2>more important than Chemnitz who basically saved the Reformation and is the</v>

00:10:36.560 --> 00:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>one who responded to the Council of Trent at length.</v>

00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Even in living memory, I think men like Kurt Marquart, certainly in</v>

00:10:46.080 --> 00:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>terms of their their theological output far outstrips Bonhoeffer's contributions, whether his</v>

00:10:52.160 --> 00:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>theology was good or bad.</v>

00:10:53.920 --> 00:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Like it's just uh one of the points that that I hope</v>

00:10:57.200 --> 00:10:59.200
<v Speaker 3>we can get across today is that</v>

00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>We're being told that this man was so important, not because he</v>

00:11:04.800 --> 00:11:11.200
<v Speaker 3>was important, but because he is a martyr in the new religion.</v>

00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>As I mentioned, the MLK Arch heretic episode is part one of</v>

00:11:16.160 --> 00:11:19.680
<v Speaker 3>this as well, just as it was part one of MLK in</v>

00:11:19.680 --> 00:11:22.320
<v Speaker 3>theology and then MLK in politics.</v>

00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Same thing played out in Bonhoeffer's life a few decades prior.</v>

00:11:25.680 --> 00:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>His theology was the same as MLK's, his politics were the same</v>

00:11:29.920 --> 00:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>as MLK's in in a number of ways that are very important.</v>

00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>And so today, yeah, both of those men were killed at age</v>

00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty-nine. They're both considered today to be martyrs.</v>

00:11:42.160 --> 00:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>They're absolutely martyrs in their religion.</v>

00:11:46.000 --> 00:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And as I said at the beginning, that's the context through which</v>

00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's necessary to view all takes on Bonhoeffer, whether it's</v>

00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>favorable or unfavorable, the man is a martyr to his faith.</v>

00:11:59.360 --> 00:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I highlight his faith because that's the problem here.</v>

00:12:02.800 --> 00:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Is his faith the Christian faith?</v>

00:12:04.880 --> 00:12:05.600
<v Speaker 3>As we're told.</v>

00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:08.080
<v Speaker 3>That yeah, that you know that's what almost every pastor will say.</v>

00:12:08.080 --> 00:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he's a you know he's a stalwart of the Christian faith.</v>

00:12:10.960 --> 00:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>He went back to Germany to fight Hitler, to kill Hitler, to</v>

00:12:14.320 --> 00:12:15.680
<v Speaker 3>save the Jews.</v>

00:12:15.680 --> 00:12:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Hero. And then he died for it.</v>

00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Like that's basically Jesus 2.0 for a lot of these guys.</v>

00:12:21.520 --> 00:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>That's it's a blasphemous thing to say.</v>

00:12:23.520 --> 00:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And I God forgive me for saying it, but that's really what's</v>

00:12:27.200 --> 00:12:28.160
<v Speaker 3>going on here.</v>

00:12:28.160 --> 00:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>And the reason that this this this narrative only emerged in the</v>

00:12:32.640 --> 00:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>last few decades?</v>

00:12:34.160 --> 00:12:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it the narrative of the 20th century only emerged in the</v>

00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>last few decades?</v>

00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Well things that I didn't mention in the Holocaust episode, if you</v>

00:12:42.800 --> 00:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>do the same Ngram search on Google for Holocaust, it also emerges</v>

00:12:47.760 --> 00:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in the 60s.</v>

00:12:48.640 --> 00:12:51.680
<v Speaker 3>There was no Holocaust described in the 40s or the 50s.</v>

00:12:51.680 --> 00:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, some of the things that are claimed to have happened then</v>

00:12:56.160 --> 00:13:00.080
<v Speaker 3>were reported at that time, but the narrative of the so called</v>

00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Holocaust emerged in the sixties, around the same time as Bonhoffer, around</v>

00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the same time as Vatican II, and they've all been on a</v>

00:13:07.520 --> 00:13:09.680
<v Speaker 3>trajectory upwards ever since then.</v>

00:13:09.680 --> 00:13:12.320
<v Speaker 3>This is and it's not an artifact of you know the corpus</v>

00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that Google searching.</v>

00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:18.560
<v Speaker 3>It's actually a function of how often those subjects are coming up.</v>

00:13:18.560 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>It's how often those subjects are in people's minds and in their</v>

00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>mouths. If it's what people are talking about, it's going to show</v>

00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:25.920
<v Speaker 3>up more frequently.</v>

00:13:25.920 --> 00:13:29.440
<v Speaker 3>So those graphs sometimes are extremely telling.</v>

00:13:29.440 --> 00:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>And Bonhoeffer in particular, even over against MLK is a vital martyr</v>

00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Holocaust faith.</v>

00:13:39.760 --> 00:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Full stop.</v>

00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>He is important in the world religion of the 21st century because</v>

00:13:45.200 --> 00:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>he died fighting Hitler.</v>

00:13:46.880 --> 00:13:49.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's part of the reason that we did that three-part episode,</v>

00:13:49.680 --> 00:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>and particularly the last episode on the history of the Jews in</v>

00:13:53.040 --> 00:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>the 20th century.</v>

00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>If everything that you've been told is true about those events, then</v>

00:13:58.640 --> 00:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>yeah, you know, obviously regardless of some of Bonhoeffer's you know maybe</v>

00:14:03.120 --> 00:14:07.200
<v Speaker 3>theological quibbles, the man was clearly a hero because he went and</v>

00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>fought the ontological evil of the Nazis.</v>

00:14:10.480 --> 00:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>If on the other hand, what we have been told about</v>

00:14:14.000 --> 00:14:18.320
<v Speaker 3>twenties twentieth century German politics is not in fact true, and that</v>

00:14:18.320 --> 00:14:22.160
<v Speaker 3>those stories that began to emerge in the story arc that appeared</v>

00:14:22.160 --> 00:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen sixties wasn't actually the case at the time, then</v>

00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>then you have to view the s the execution of men like</v>

00:14:30.640 --> 00:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer and their acts that led up to the execution in a</v>

00:14:34.400 --> 00:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>different light.</v>

00:14:35.520 --> 00:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>One of the tough things about tackling these subjects is that in</v>

00:14:38.960 --> 00:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons that we talk about timelines, which is tough</v>

00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>to do in a podcast because you can't see them, I will</v>

00:14:43.680 --> 00:14:46.880
<v Speaker 3>cut we'll put a couple of those screenshots in the show notes</v>

00:14:46.880 --> 00:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>so you can visually look at them.</v>

00:14:48.880 --> 00:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>We're talking in current year about events in the past, but it's</v>

00:14:54.160 --> 00:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>crucial to consider them as they were occurring, to consider what they</v>

00:14:59.120 --> 00:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>knew at the time and then what's happened since then to bring</v>

00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:03.520
<v Speaker 3>them to our attention.</v>

00:15:03.520 --> 00:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Because Bonafer died eighty years ago, and a whole bunch of stuff</v>

00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>has sent happened since then.</v>

00:15:11.280 --> 00:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>And he wasn't very important, and then he became important.</v>

00:15:14.800 --> 00:15:17.040
<v Speaker 3>We're here to tell you today that the reason he became important</v>

00:15:17.040 --> 00:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>was that the new world religion requires new martyrs to to uphold</v>

00:15:21.840 --> 00:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the tenets of the new faith.</v>

00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's what he accomplished.</v>

00:15:26.800 --> 00:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And as we go through the material in this episode, and this</v>

00:15:30.880 --> 00:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>was already mentioned, but it is worth repeating this to emphasize it,</v>

00:15:36.560 --> 00:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>it is important to recognize a simple but vitally important</v>

00:15:44.400 --> 00:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>philosophical fact.</v>

00:15:46.800 --> 00:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>There is a difference between</v>

00:15:48.800 --> 00:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the term used to reference a thing and the thing itself.</v>

00:15:53.520 --> 00:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>So, for instance, the thing that we in English call a dog</v>

00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Is not called a dog in French or Latin or German.</v>

00:16:01.280 --> 00:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>They're different words in those languages.</v>

00:16:04.560 --> 00:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>The term refers to the thing, the thing is distinct from the</v>

00:16:08.160 --> 00:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>term. The same thing can occur in philosophy or theology, and that</v>

00:16:14.000 --> 00:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>is what we have throughout Bonhoeffer's writings.</v>

00:16:19.440 --> 00:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>He uses terms that sound Christian.</v>

00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>If you're a Lutheran in particular, there are some things you're going</v>

00:16:26.400 --> 00:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to read it and go, I recognize all of these words.</v>

00:16:28.800 --> 00:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>This sounds vaguely Christian.</v>

00:16:32.960 --> 00:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>But you have to understand the way in which he is using</v>

00:16:35.600 --> 00:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the terms, and you have to have</v>

00:16:39.760 --> 00:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>really a better overhead, a 30,000-foot view of what he is doing,</v>

00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>how he believes these things, what he thinks they mean.</v>

00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>And so he'll say, resurrection, and you'll think, okay, that's a that's</v>

00:16:54.080 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>a Christian term.</v>

00:16:54.720 --> 00:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Well he denies the resurrection.</v>

00:16:57.520 --> 00:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>He'll say crucifixion.</v>

00:16:59.200 --> 00:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>You'll say, okay, that's a Christian term.</v>

00:17:01.360 --> 00:17:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Well he calls it a myth.</v>

00:17:04.080 --> 00:17:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And that happens with all of these terms.</v>

00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:10.640
<v Speaker 2>So you may hear a term from him that makes you think,</v>

00:17:10.640 --> 00:17:14.400
<v Speaker 2>yes, that's a term a Christian would use, but it's not a</v>

00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Christian term when he's using it.</v>

00:17:16.640 --> 00:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Satan can use these terms too, and he does all the time.</v>

00:17:20.320 --> 00:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget that when Satan confronted and attempted to tempt Christ, he</v>

00:17:25.520 --> 00:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>used Scripture.</v>

00:17:26.960 --> 00:17:29.680
<v Speaker 2>He used God's own words.</v>

00:17:29.680 --> 00:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>It is possible to twist the things of God and make them</v>

00:17:33.840 --> 00:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>no longer reference what they are meant to reference, no longer reference</v>

00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the actual Christian faith.</v>

00:17:40.080 --> 00:17:43.360
<v Speaker 2>It is vitally important to bear that in mind as we go</v>

00:17:43.360 --> 00:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>through. We will, of course, highlight how he's using these terms, misusing</v>

00:17:48.240 --> 00:17:50.640
<v Speaker 2>these terms, really.</v>

00:17:50.640 --> 00:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But keep that in mind.</v>

00:17:52.080 --> 00:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Just because you hear a word that you recognize as being related</v>

00:17:56.240 --> 00:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>to the Christian faith does not mean that it is being used</v>

00:18:00.240 --> 00:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>in this context in a Christian way.</v>

00:18:04.080 --> 00:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>And if you've taken our advice and have recently listened to or</v>

00:18:07.840 --> 00:18:11.280
<v Speaker 3>re-listened to the to the MLKR character episode.</v>

00:18:11.280 --> 00:18:15.440
<v Speaker 3>All that sounds incredibly familiar, because that's precisely what King did.</v>

00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>As I said, the difference between King's approach and Bonhoeffer's approach is</v>

00:18:19.600 --> 00:18:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that King was stupid.</v>

00:18:22.000 --> 00:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't intelligent, but his handlers made him understand that there were</v>

00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>things that he couldn't say in public.</v>

00:18:29.600 --> 00:18:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So although the things that Bonhoeffer wrote about publicly as a theologian</v>

00:18:35.040 --> 00:18:39.600
<v Speaker 3>are are exactly the same things that King was saying decades later</v>

00:18:39.680 --> 00:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>because they got them from the same teachers.</v>

00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>King was instructed don't say this in public, don't say the stuff</v>

00:18:45.520 --> 00:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>in the pulpit because you're not going to be able to get</v>

00:18:47.600 --> 00:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>away with it.</v>

00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer was able to wrap it up in enough Jesus dust that</v>

00:18:53.680 --> 00:18:55.680
<v Speaker 3>he was able to get away with it because he was a</v>

00:18:55.680 --> 00:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>much smarter, much slipperier man.</v>

00:18:58.240 --> 00:19:01.360
<v Speaker 3>But the basics of what they believed were identical.</v>

00:19:01.360 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>As Corey said, like write down the list of things in the</v>

00:19:04.880 --> 00:19:09.920
<v Speaker 3>in the creeds that every Christian confesses are the things that Bonhoeffer</v>

00:19:09.920 --> 00:19:15.120
<v Speaker 3>denies. And the reason that's important when you're talking about someone who's</v>

00:19:15.120 --> 00:19:19.520
<v Speaker 3>presenting Christian theology is that it's one thing for someone to have</v>

00:19:19.520 --> 00:19:22.880
<v Speaker 3>a bad take on a per particular subject.</v>

00:19:22.880 --> 00:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>It's another thing entirely if all of their takes, whether they're good</v>

00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:31.680
<v Speaker 3>or bad, are built on a foundation of overt denial of the</v>

00:19:31.680 --> 00:19:32.880
<v Speaker 3>tenets of the faith.</v>

00:19:32.880 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>And that's what we have with Bonhoff.</v>

00:19:34.480 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>We have a man who overtly denied the foundations of the Christian</v>

00:19:38.400 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 3>faith. And then he said stuff after that that sounded sorta Christian.</v>

00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:46.160
<v Speaker 3>That is the nightmare scenario for someone who's not smart enough to</v>

00:19:46.160 --> 00:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>see through it.</v>

00:19:47.120 --> 00:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>So just as a first example, this um a few of the</v>

00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:54.160
<v Speaker 3>quotes we're gonna do earlier on are from a book called Christ</v>

00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the Center.</v>

00:19:55.440 --> 00:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>This is described as Bonhoeff's kind of Christological Magnum opus.</v>

00:20:00.560 --> 00:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>The important thing to note with this is that he didn't write</v>

00:20:04.080 --> 00:20:05.360
<v Speaker 3>this himself.</v>

00:20:05.360 --> 00:20:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Christ the Center is effectively table talks from his teaching in around</v>

00:20:10.400 --> 00:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>1933. So the authors of that book compiled all the notes from</v>

00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:18.080
<v Speaker 3>as many of the students as they could get a hold of</v>

00:20:18.160 --> 00:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>and resynthesized his talks and presentations on thing.</v>

00:20:22.560 --> 00:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Now in the beginning of the book, and obviously is something that</v>

00:20:25.600 --> 00:20:29.360
<v Speaker 3>we as Lutherans will point to clearly, Tishrain or Table Talks are</v>

00:20:29.360 --> 00:20:35.840
<v Speaker 3>notoriously unreliable sources of information because you know it's it's it's hearsay.</v>

00:20:35.840 --> 00:20:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Someone said something and then someone else wrote it down and then</v>

00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>they're giving it to another person saying, yeah, he said this.</v>

00:20:41.600 --> 00:20:45.920
<v Speaker 3>It's potentially reliable or unreliable, you can't necessarily weigh it.</v>

00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:49.840
<v Speaker 3>The reason that I give full credence to the spirit of the</v>

00:20:49.840 --> 00:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>words that are presented here, and you may disregard them, I'm disclosing</v>

00:20:53.840 --> 00:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>this up front, that we're dealing with something that he did not</v>

00:20:56.800 --> 00:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>expressly pen by his own hand.</v>

00:20:59.040 --> 00:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>The reason I believe it fully is that</v>

00:21:03.120 --> 00:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer was a disciple of Carl Barth.</v>

00:21:06.640 --> 00:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>B-A-R-T-H. I I call him Barth.</v>

00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Like John Candy's character from Space Balls, because he d he makes</v>

00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:15.200
<v Speaker 3>me puke.</v>

00:21:15.200 --> 00:21:18.160
<v Speaker 3>So much evil is downstream from Barf that I'm just gonna call</v>

00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>him that.</v>

00:21:18.560 --> 00:21:20.640
<v Speaker 3>If you think that's child, just deal with it.</v>

00:21:20.800 --> 00:21:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Corey's gonna call him Bart 'cause he's good at at other languages.</v>

00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't care.</v>

00:21:25.440 --> 00:21:27.200
<v Speaker 3>The dude's name is Barf.</v>

00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer was an acolyte and a disciple of Barf.</v>

00:21:31.360 --> 00:21:33.440
<v Speaker 3>he literally learned at his feet.</v>

00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>They studied he studied from him.</v>

00:21:35.680 --> 00:21:37.200
<v Speaker 3>He discussed with him.</v>

00:21:37.200 --> 00:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>The things that he's aro about to say here in Christ the</v>

00:21:42.080 --> 00:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Center in these Table Talks are exactly the same the things that</v>

00:21:45.840 --> 00:21:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Barth was saying.</v>

00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>And incidentally, they're the very same things that MLK picked up a</v>

00:21:50.560 --> 00:21:51.760
<v Speaker 3>couple decades later.</v>

00:21:51.760 --> 00:21:56.880
<v Speaker 3>So this is a perfect description of the beliefs of that day</v>

00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:02.160
<v Speaker 3>coming from this part of the so called Christian theological discourse.</v>

00:22:02.560 --> 00:22:06.640
<v Speaker 3>No, to us, you know, this is what MLK called this was</v>

00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the liberal tradition.</v>

00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:11.840
<v Speaker 3>What it is is a full-on assault on Christianity.</v>

00:22:11.840 --> 00:22:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So just to disclose, he did not write these by his own</v>

00:22:14.800 --> 00:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>hand, these are accounts secondhand by witnesses.</v>

00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:22.160
<v Speaker 3>They're entirely consistent with his teacher, and they're consistent with these things</v>

00:22:22.160 --> 00:22:23.360
<v Speaker 3>he said later on.</v>

00:22:23.360 --> 00:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna read this just know that it's not necessarily exactly</v>

00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>verbatim what he said, but personally I have no reason to doubt</v>

00:22:31.440 --> 00:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>that this is not faithful, because it's entirely consistent with the man,</v>

00:22:34.640 --> 00:22:37.440
<v Speaker 3>with his teacher, with his time, and with his beliefs for the</v>

00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>rest of his life.</v>

00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:43.680
<v Speaker 3>So Christ in the center writes, Strictly speaking, we should not talk</v>

00:22:43.680 --> 00:22:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of the Incarnation, but of the Incarnate One.</v>

00:22:46.640 --> 00:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>The former interest arises out of the question how.</v>

00:22:49.600 --> 00:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>The question how, for example, underlies the hypothesis of the virgin birth.</v>

00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Both historically and dogmatically it can be questioned.</v>

00:22:57.600 --> 00:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>The bit of biblical witness is ambiguous.</v>

00:23:00.320 --> 00:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>If the biblical witness gave clear evidence of the fact, then the</v>

00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>dogmatic obscurity might not have been so important.</v>

00:23:06.960 --> 00:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>The doctrine of the virgin birth is meant to express the incarnation</v>

00:23:10.080 --> 00:23:13.360
<v Speaker 3>of God, not only the fact of the incarnate one.</v>

00:23:13.360 --> 00:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>But does it not fail at the decisive point of the incarnation,</v>

00:23:16.960 --> 00:23:20.880
<v Speaker 3>namely that in it Jesus has not become man just like us.</v>

00:23:20.880 --> 00:23:25.520
<v Speaker 3>The question remains open as and because it is already open in</v>

00:23:25.520 --> 00:23:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the Bible.</v>

00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:27.200
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

00:23:28.240 --> 00:23:32.400
<v Speaker 3>this is consistent with m what MLK said the Virgin birth is</v>

00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:33.440
<v Speaker 3>a myth.</v>

00:23:33.440 --> 00:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>He he'll go on in some of these later quotes to talk</v>

00:23:36.160 --> 00:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>expressly about myths.</v>

00:23:37.520 --> 00:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>That was something that he got from Baldman, another one of King's</v>

00:23:41.200 --> 00:23:42.800
<v Speaker 3>inspirations and teachers.</v>

00:23:42.800 --> 00:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Baldman was very big on mythologizing scripture.</v>

00:23:46.720 --> 00:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, in the episode we did early on that I mentioned</v>

00:23:49.520 --> 00:23:54.160
<v Speaker 3>previously about the clarity of scripture, is it true or is it</v>

00:23:54.160 --> 00:23:55.680
<v Speaker 3>factual? Is it real?</v>

00:23:55.680 --> 00:23:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it you know people play these word games in order to</v>

00:23:59.120 --> 00:24:00.400
<v Speaker 3>tie you in knots.</v>

00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>So that you don't will is it the incarnate Jesus or is</v>

00:24:04.320 --> 00:24:05.600
<v Speaker 3>it the incarnation?</v>

00:24:05.600 --> 00:24:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Like what does that even mean?</v>

00:24:07.360 --> 00:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>What he does when he he says these things is a he's</v>

00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:12.240
<v Speaker 3>flatly denying the virgin birth.</v>

00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:15.600
<v Speaker 3>He's saying it's not in the Bible, which is a lie.</v>

00:24:15.600 --> 00:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>It is a demonstrable lie that the virgin birth is not in</v>

00:24:18.080 --> 00:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the Bible, but this is what they were doing already.</v>

00:24:20.640 --> 00:24:22.720
<v Speaker 3>They were just tearing down scripture.</v>

00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.680
<v Speaker 3>And then on top of it, they say, Oh, but it doesn't</v>

00:24:25.600 --> 00:24:29.120
<v Speaker 3>even matter if it's real, because we have the incarnate one.</v>

00:24:29.120 --> 00:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you deny the virgin birth and yin you have something</v>

00:24:32.160 --> 00:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>left over that you call the incarnate one, that's not the Messiah.</v>

00:24:37.600 --> 00:24:40.560
<v Speaker 3>that's what we're dealing with through all these quotes.</v>

00:24:40.560 --> 00:24:45.360
<v Speaker 3>They will take something, they will strip away the actual truthfulness of</v>

00:24:45.360 --> 00:24:49.040
<v Speaker 3>what's in scripture, and then leave something that as Corey said, still</v>

00:24:49.360 --> 00:24:52.400
<v Speaker 3>they're using some of the same names that we Christians use for</v>

00:24:52.400 --> 00:24:55.200
<v Speaker 3>things, but they use them for other purposes.</v>

00:24:55.200 --> 00:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>And so that's why I said this is tricky and it's dangerously</v>

00:24:58.240 --> 00:25:02.400
<v Speaker 3>deceptive how these men speak, because if you're not paying paying incredibly</v>

00:25:02.400 --> 00:25:05.600
<v Speaker 3>close critical attention, he'll just gloss right over and say, that's fine.</v>

00:25:06.160 --> 00:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Jesus the incarnate one, Jesus was the incarnation.</v>

00:25:08.720 --> 00:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's I I believe that.</v>

00:25:10.160 --> 00:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>That's in the creed somewhere.</v>

00:25:11.920 --> 00:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It's only when you're critically looking at this stuff, just assuming that</v>

00:25:15.920 --> 00:25:18.960
<v Speaker 3>it's false and then trying to prove yourself wrong, that you realize</v>

00:25:18.960 --> 00:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>you can't prove yourself wrong.</v>

00:25:20.080 --> 00:25:20.640
<v Speaker 3>It's false.</v>

00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:22.800
<v Speaker 3>He's denying, he's denying scripture.</v>

00:25:22.800 --> 00:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>He's denying the virgin birth.</v>

00:25:24.320 --> 00:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And that itself, all by itself, isn't denial of Christianity, full stop.</v>

00:25:29.760 --> 00:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>So if if this quote were true and it was the only</v>

00:25:32.480 --> 00:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>thing, that'd be the end of the story.</v>

00:25:34.240 --> 00:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>The man is not Christian.</v>

00:25:35.840 --> 00:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Part of the reason we're beginning here is that this is one</v>

00:25:37.920 --> 00:25:43.120
<v Speaker 3>of the more crystal clear examples of Barth's theology coming through in</v>

00:25:43.120 --> 00:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>his mouth and then him continuing it on ultimately to treason and</v>

00:25:47.600 --> 00:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>attempted murder.</v>

00:25:48.800 --> 00:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>That's the trajectory of a man who incidentally at the end of</v>

00:25:51.280 --> 00:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>his life, as we'll get to it, he stopped reading the Bible.</v>

00:25:54.080 --> 00:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>He was he was effectively apostate and he more or less acknowledged</v>

00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:01.680
<v Speaker 3>it. But it began here with these denials of the creed.</v>

00:26:01.680 --> 00:26:07.120
<v Speaker 3>You never you never go immediately from getting one fact of the</v>

00:26:07.120 --> 00:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Christian faith wrong to apostasy, there's always a trajectory.</v>

00:26:11.520 --> 00:26:14.240
<v Speaker 3>So today we're gonna make the case for him having gone through</v>

00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:17.520
<v Speaker 3>that trajectory, regardless of where he began, because as we see here,</v>

00:26:17.520 --> 00:26:20.880
<v Speaker 3>he's beginning with denial of the faith.</v>

00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:21.360
For

00:26:21.360 --> 00:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the record, I do think that calling him barf is fair.</v>

00:26:25.200 --> 00:26:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Particularly considering there's there's a sort of contagion to vomiting for certain</v>

00:26:29.920 --> 00:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>people where one person will vomit and another one will.</v>

00:26:32.480 --> 00:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of how it works with that theology.</v>

00:26:35.600 --> 00:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>There's another linguistic point to make here, and I know it seems</v>

00:26:38.560 --> 00:26:42.880
<v Speaker 2>like we're going to make some hypertechnical points in this episode, but</v>

00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it's important.</v>

00:26:45.280 --> 00:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>The word myth is not univocal.</v>

00:26:49.280 --> 00:26:51.360
<v Speaker 2>The word myth does not have one meaning.</v>

00:26:51.360 --> 00:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>The word myth can be used in a good or a bad</v>

00:26:55.120 --> 00:26:57.440
<v Speaker 2>way with regard to theology.</v>

00:26:57.440 --> 00:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>You can call Christianity a mythos</v>

00:27:00.800 --> 00:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>and still be an actual Christian.</v>

00:27:05.040 --> 00:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, most theologians, most philosophers who are sound Christians will not do</v>

00:27:10.160 --> 00:27:15.440
<v Speaker 2>that. That is a specific, specialized technical sense of the term, myth</v>

00:27:15.520 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>or mythos, whichever one you want to use, those are interchangeable.</v>

00:27:20.720 --> 00:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>That is not what Bonhoeffer is doing.</v>

00:27:24.320 --> 00:27:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Because he in other places in his writing explicitly contrasts myth and</v>

00:27:30.480 --> 00:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>history. He does not identify them, he does not consider them as</v>

00:27:34.560 --> 00:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>overlapping, he considers them distinct things, and he considers myth to be</v>

00:27:40.080 --> 00:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>unreliable, to be untrue, to be made up.</v>

00:27:44.880 --> 00:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>One of the examples he uses is the partly former, partly still,</v>

00:27:51.280 --> 00:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Japanese belief that the Tenno, otherwise known as the Emperor of Japan,</v>

00:27:55.680 --> 00:27:59.200
<v Speaker 2>was descended directly from a goddess.</v>

00:27:59.200 --> 00:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>He uses that as an example of myth and contrasts that sort</v>

00:28:03.040 --> 00:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of Eastern belief in the descent of their kings, their emperors from</v>

00:28:08.960 --> 00:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>gods, as myth from Western history.</v>

00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So when he says myth, he means it didn't happen.</v>

00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>So the word myth in his mouth, coming from his pen, is</v>

00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>calling whatever is a myth untrue, saying it is not historical fact,</v>

00:28:27.680 --> 00:28:30.880
<v Speaker 2>it is not empirical, and elsewhere in his writing he constantly make</v>

00:28:31.040 --> 00:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>claims about Christianity not being empirical truth.</v>

00:28:35.920 --> 00:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And this is again from Bart, in large part, because he makes</v>

00:28:39.520 --> 00:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>a distinction between the empirical and the religious, and says that the</v>

00:28:45.280 --> 00:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>religious doesn't necessarily correspond to the empirical, and calls the Old Testament</v>

00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>a series of religious truths, of religious claims, and in so claiming</v>

00:28:59.280 --> 00:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>he says that they are not empirical.</v>

00:29:02.800 --> 00:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is one of the ways that we wind up with</v>

00:29:05.600 --> 00:29:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a rejection of apologetics from men like Bart and Bernhofer and others,</v>

00:29:11.040 --> 00:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>because</v>

00:29:12.480 --> 00:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they don't believe that religious truth corresponds to empirical truth, and apologetics</v>

00:29:19.360 --> 00:29:22.080
<v Speaker 2>relies on that.</v>

00:29:22.080 --> 00:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>But we also see here, just at the outset, the first real</v>

00:29:26.240 --> 00:29:30.240
<v Speaker 2>chunk of his writing with which we're dealing, not even a very</v>

00:29:30.240 --> 00:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>big one, his rejection of dogma and doctrine.</v>

00:29:34.160 --> 00:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And this is throughout his writing.</v>

00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:41.280
<v Speaker 2>He basically says that Christianity is not a series of dogmas or</v>

00:29:41.280 --> 00:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>doctrinal claims, which it is.</v>

00:29:44.000 --> 00:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's be clear here.</v>

00:29:45.280 --> 00:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Christianity makes truth claims.</v>

00:29:48.160 --> 00:29:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Christianity is a series of truth claims.</v>

00:29:51.680 --> 00:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>If those claims are false, Christianity is false.</v>

00:29:57.280 --> 00:29:59.280
<v Speaker 2>He's saying that doesn't matter.</v>

00:29:59.280 --> 00:30:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Doctrine doesn't matter, dogma doesn't matter.</v>

00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I have a a quote here.</v>

00:30:04.800 --> 00:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Before we started recording, we're discussing potentially using a generated</v>

00:30:11.920 --> 00:30:14.720
<v Speaker 2>voice to read some of this, because to some degree, I don't</v>

00:30:14.720 --> 00:30:16.560
<v Speaker 2>even want these things in my own voice.</v>

00:30:16.560 --> 00:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure Wo feels the same way because of the evil</v>

00:30:20.160 --> 00:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of some of the things we're going to read in this episode.</v>

00:30:23.120 --> 00:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>But I guess in an age of AI it hardly matters.</v>

00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Matters there's enough of my voice out there that someone could synthesize</v>

00:30:28.320 --> 00:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it if he were so inclined.</v>

00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>But on the topic of dogma or doctrine, this is a quote</v>

00:30:35.840 --> 00:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>from</v>

00:30:37.680 --> 00:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>this one is from an outline for a book that he sent</v>

00:30:42.080 --> 00:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in one of his letters.</v>

00:30:44.800 --> 00:30:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Jesus's being for others is the experience of transcendence.</v>

00:30:49.840 --> 00:30:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Only through this liberation from self, through this being for others unto</v>

00:30:54.400 --> 00:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>death, do omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence come into being.</v>

00:30:59.600 --> 00:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Faith is participating in this being of Jesus, becoming human, cross resurrection.</v>

00:31:05.680 --> 00:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Our relationship to God is no religious relationship to some highest, most</v>

00:31:10.640 --> 00:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>powerful, and best being imaginable.</v>

00:31:13.200 --> 00:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>That is no genuine transcendence.</v>

00:31:15.440 --> 00:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Instead our relationship to God is a new life in being there</v>

00:31:19.840 --> 00:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>for others, through participation in the being of Jesus.</v>

00:31:23.760 --> 00:31:28.640
<v Speaker 2>The transcendent is not the infinite, unattainable task, but the neighbor within</v>

00:31:28.640 --> 00:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>reach in any given situation</v>

00:31:31.200 --> 00:31:32.960
<v Speaker 2>What do we really believe?</v>

00:31:32.960 --> 00:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean believe in such a way that our lives depend on</v>

00:31:35.920 --> 00:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>it. The problem of the Apostles' Creed, written as a question What</v>

00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:41.200
<v Speaker 2>must I believe?</v>

00:31:41.200 --> 00:31:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Wrong question, outdated controversies, especially the interconfessional ones, the differences between Lutheran</v>

00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and Reformed, and to some extent Roman Catholic, are no longer real.</v>

00:31:52.480 --> 00:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Of course they can be revived with passion at any time, but</v>

00:31:55.920 --> 00:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>they are no longer convincing.</v>

00:31:57.840 --> 00:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>There is no proof for this.</v>

00:31:59.360 --> 00:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>One must simply be bold enough to start from this.</v>

00:32:02.320 --> 00:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>The only thing we can prove is that the Christian biblical faith</v>

00:32:06.000 --> 00:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>does not live or depend on such differences.</v>

00:32:08.800 --> 00:32:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Conclusions The Church is church only when it is there for others.</v>

00:32:13.360 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>As a first step, it must give away all its property to</v>

00:32:16.480 --> 00:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>those in need.</v>

00:32:18.240 --> 00:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>There is such a collection of problems with this, and I didn't</v>

00:32:22.240 --> 00:32:26.240
<v Speaker 2>even read the whole passage because it's a couple full pages.</v>

00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>It's difficult even to go through or summarize them in a quick</v>

00:32:30.960 --> 00:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>fashion, but note how he starts off it's almost Buddhist Liberation from</v>

00:32:37.360 --> 00:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>self. That's not what Christianity is.</v>

00:32:40.560 --> 00:32:46.160
<v Speaker 2>God created you to be the person you are.</v>

00:32:46.160 --> 00:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you are currently in a fallen state, and as a Christian,</v>

00:32:50.480 --> 00:32:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you will be perfected in the resurrection, but that is becoming more</v>

00:32:54.560 --> 00:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>yourself. It is not becoming less yourself.</v>

00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:03.120
<v Speaker 2>God did not make you wrong.</v>

00:33:03.120 --> 00:33:05.840
<v Speaker 2>You are what God wants you to be.</v>

00:33:05.840 --> 00:33:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Again, yes, fallen state, imperfect currently.</v>

00:33:09.760 --> 00:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Christianity is not a giving up of self.</v>

00:33:14.000 --> 00:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>It is not in the Buddhist Eastern sense a denial of self.</v>

00:33:19.360 --> 00:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>It is a denial of self in the sense of take up</v>

00:33:22.080 --> 00:33:24.720
<v Speaker 2>your cross and follow me.</v>

00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what he's speaking about here.</v>

00:33:26.720 --> 00:33:28.800
<v Speaker 2>This is liberation from self.</v>

00:33:28.800 --> 00:33:32.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Eastern philosophy being imported into Christianity, and we see this</v>

00:33:32.640 --> 00:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>constantly in men from this era who are of the liberal school</v>

00:33:38.160 --> 00:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>because there was an infatuation with Eastern philosophy, and he was very</v>

00:33:42.160 --> 00:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>familiar with philosophy.</v>

00:33:43.520 --> 00:33:48.240
<v Speaker 2>We see that throughout his writing, mostly continental, but also Eastern.</v>

00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>But the next part I actually find more interesting, when he says</v>

00:33:51.440 --> 00:33:56.640
<v Speaker 2>that it's only through this being for others that omnipotence, omniscience, and</v>

00:33:56.640 --> 00:33:59.680
<v Speaker 2>omnipresence come into being.</v>

00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:03.520
<v Speaker 2>This is a blunt denial of the nature of God, which is</v>

00:34:03.600 --> 00:34:07.920
<v Speaker 2>if as we have highlighted in previous episodes, a denial of the</v>

00:34:07.920 --> 00:34:11.200
<v Speaker 2>nature of God, a denial of the attributes of God, is a</v>

00:34:11.200 --> 00:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>denial of God, because God is his nature, his attributes are his</v>

00:34:14.080 --> 00:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>nature, these are interchangeable.</v>

00:34:15.600 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 2>We speak of them as if they were parts because we're human</v>

00:34:18.800 --> 00:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's one of our limitations limitations.</v>

00:34:21.840 --> 00:34:24.800
<v Speaker 2>He's denying God here.</v>

00:34:24.800 --> 00:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>He is simply outright rejecting the reality of God.</v>

00:34:29.120 --> 00:34:33.280
<v Speaker 2>A Christian cannot write this, at least not and remain Christian.</v>

00:34:33.280 --> 00:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Which isn't surprising because as was mentioned, his trajectory was downward, was</v>

00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:40.320
<v Speaker 2>hellward at the end of his life.</v>

00:34:40.320 --> 00:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>He stopped reading scripture, he stopped believing in some of the bits</v>

00:34:44.560 --> 00:34:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of Christianity in which he believed</v>

00:34:46.640 --> 00:34:50.400
<v Speaker 2>at some point in the past, he became more and more apostate</v>

00:34:50.560 --> 00:34:51.760
<v Speaker 2>as he went on.</v>

00:34:51.760 --> 00:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And you see that where he calls the apostles' creed a problem.</v>

00:34:55.680 --> 00:34:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Literally words it is a question mark, the problem of the apostles</v>

00:34:59.040 --> 00:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Creed. Christians don't view the creeds as a problem.</v>

00:35:03.200 --> 00:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Christians view the Creeds as a summary statement of our faith.</v>

00:35:07.680 --> 00:35:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And as someone who claimed to be Lutheran, he was bound to</v>

00:35:11.680 --> 00:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>believe that every word of the creeds is true.</v>

00:35:14.160 --> 00:35:18.160
<v Speaker 2>It's part of our confession, not that the confession of course meant</v>

00:35:18.160 --> 00:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>anything to this man.</v>

00:35:21.120 --> 00:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>And then it's in that same paragraph where we see this denial,</v>

00:35:26.160 --> 00:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>outright, blunt denial, of the importance of dogma and doctrine, of the</v>

00:35:30.480 --> 00:35:32.720
<v Speaker 2>importance of truth.</v>

00:35:32.720 --> 00:35:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Because that is what is actually at stake when you deny that</v>

00:35:36.000 --> 00:35:36.800
<v Speaker 2>doctrine is important.</v>

00:35:37.600 --> 00:35:42.080
<v Speaker 2>If you say that the differences between the Lutherans and the Reformed</v>

00:35:42.080 --> 00:35:46.320
<v Speaker 2>don't matter, or between the Reformed and</v>

00:35:47.360 --> 00:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the Romanists, or the East, and Lutherans.</v>

00:35:51.200 --> 00:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Whatever groups you happen to pick, if you say that those differences</v>

00:35:53.920 --> 00:35:57.840
<v Speaker 2>don't matter, you're saying truth doesn't matter.</v>

00:35:57.840 --> 00:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Because there are only three options.</v>

00:36:01.040 --> 00:36:05.600
<v Speaker 2>If Lutherine's claim A, the reformed claim B</v>

00:36:06.720 --> 00:36:06.960
<v Speaker 2>then</v>

00:36:08.800 --> 00:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>if A is right, B is wrong.</v>

00:36:11.680 --> 00:36:15.040
<v Speaker 2>If B is right, A is wrong, and of course the third</v>

00:36:15.040 --> 00:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>option is both are wrong and there's a third option C.</v>

00:36:18.960 --> 00:36:23.920
<v Speaker 2>But you cannot have these differences not matter because these are about</v>

00:36:23.920 --> 00:36:24.880
<v Speaker 2>eternal things.</v>

00:36:24.880 --> 00:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>This is about truth, and the truth matters because the truth is</v>

00:36:28.960 --> 00:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the attributes of God, it is part of his nature.</v>

00:36:32.400 --> 00:36:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But of course, elsewhere, in many places, Bonhoeffer denies that truth matters.</v>

00:36:38.400 --> 00:36:42.320
<v Speaker 2>The truth is even a transcendent thing, and he full well knew</v>

00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:45.760
<v Speaker 2>what he was saying, because he was familiar with the philosophy that</v>

00:36:45.760 --> 00:36:48.960
<v Speaker 2>deals with the transcendentals.</v>

00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>He repeatedly, in his writing, denies God.</v>

00:36:53.520 --> 00:36:56.080
<v Speaker 2>That is not something that a Christian can do.</v>

00:36:56.080 --> 00:36:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It is not something that a man who claims to be Christian</v>

00:36:58.640 --> 00:37:01.040
<v Speaker 2>can do and remain Christian.</v>

00:37:01.200 --> 00:37:04.560
<v Speaker 3>This was one of those passages that I found interesting because</v>

00:37:05.440 --> 00:37:08.080
<v Speaker 3>small pieces of it echo, as I said, things that you and</v>

00:37:08.080 --> 00:37:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I say on Stone Choir.</v>

00:37:10.160 --> 00:37:13.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is where the origins of those beliefs come</v>

00:37:13.840 --> 00:37:16.640
<v Speaker 3>from diametrically opposed places.</v>

00:37:16.640 --> 00:37:22.160
<v Speaker 3>When MLK and Bonhoeffer are saying forget forget this doctrinal stuff, we</v>

00:37:22.160 --> 00:37:25.520
<v Speaker 3>just need to focus on neighbor and focus on you know the</v>

00:37:26.000 --> 00:37:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the liberation theology version of best life now.</v>

00:37:30.000 --> 00:37:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Basically it's it's basically a manifestation of Tikanolam, which we talked about</v>

00:37:34.560 --> 00:37:38.880
<v Speaker 3>I think in the second episode of the three part on Jews.</v>

00:37:38.880 --> 00:37:43.520
<v Speaker 3>When Cory and I specifically talk about care for neighbor, love of</v>

00:37:43.520 --> 00:37:48.720
<v Speaker 3>ma neighbor, love of family, respect and love and preservation of nation,</v>

00:37:48.720 --> 00:37:51.600
<v Speaker 3>that is race, it is not</v>

00:37:52.560 --> 00:37:56.080
<v Speaker 3>self-referential. It's obedience to God.</v>

00:37:56.080 --> 00:37:59.520
<v Speaker 3>It is looking up and looking at scripture.</v>

00:37:59.520 --> 00:38:02.800
<v Speaker 3>It's looking to see what God has revealed to us, what He's</v>

00:38:02.800 --> 00:38:06.560
<v Speaker 3>telling us to do as our creator, and then following through, because</v>

00:38:06.560 --> 00:38:09.200
<v Speaker 3>we acknowledge that we are creatures.</v>

00:38:09.200 --> 00:38:12.640
<v Speaker 3>The distinction between the approach that we take, which is a Christian</v>

00:38:12.640 --> 00:38:18.640
<v Speaker 3>approach of living a Christian life in view of heaven, of God's</v>

00:38:18.640 --> 00:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>promises and of God's commands, versus the Barf and MLK and Bonhoeffer</v>

00:38:25.760 --> 00:38:29.840
<v Speaker 3>view is that they basically say God is going to be whatever</v>

00:38:29.840 --> 00:38:31.120
<v Speaker 3>we feel He is.</v>

00:38:31.120 --> 00:38:34.160
<v Speaker 3>We know we have this feeling that God is this good stuff.</v>

00:38:34.160 --> 00:38:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's make the good stuff happen now.</v>

00:38:36.160 --> 00:38:38.640
<v Speaker 3>And so is we're going to get to in in some of</v>

00:38:38.640 --> 00:38:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the quotes here in a little bit, he eventually gets to the</v>

00:38:42.320 --> 00:38:43.520
<v Speaker 3>point that he's like</v>

00:38:44.720 --> 00:38:50.880
<v Speaker 3>We don't need God anymore in theology in order to have Christianity.</v>

00:38:50.880 --> 00:38:53.520
<v Speaker 3>And we don't need to call it Christianity anymore because Christ is</v>

00:38:53.520 --> 00:38:56.080
<v Speaker 3>gone, but we still have all the stuff that God wanted for</v>

00:38:56.080 --> 00:38:58.880
<v Speaker 3>us. That's the exact opposite of what Corey and I believe.</v>

00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:01.280
<v Speaker 3>That's exact opposite of what Christianity teaches.</v>

00:39:01.280 --> 00:39:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Like it's not that's not stone Choir theology versus Bonhoeffer theology.</v>

00:39:05.360 --> 00:39:10.400
<v Speaker 3>It's literally Christianity versus the satanic destruction of things that were good</v>

00:39:10.640 --> 00:39:13.520
<v Speaker 3>for the sake of creating a world where nothing good can ever</v>

00:39:13.520 --> 00:39:14.800
<v Speaker 3>again exist.</v>

00:39:14.800 --> 00:39:17.200
<v Speaker 3>So it it struck me that again, this is one of those</v>

00:39:17.200 --> 00:39:20.080
<v Speaker 3>things that it sounds a bit like us if you're not paying</v>

00:39:20.080 --> 00:39:23.840
<v Speaker 3>attention to the sources, but it's it's very clear that we're on</v>

00:39:23.840 --> 00:39:27.600
<v Speaker 3>exactly opposite sides of these questions.</v>

00:39:27.600 --> 00:39:30.720
<v Speaker 3>There's another quote here that's also from Christ in the center from</v>

00:39:30.720 --> 00:39:36.640
<v Speaker 3>nineteen thirty three, where he flat out denies that Jesus was perfect.</v>

00:39:36.640 --> 00:39:41.840
<v Speaker 3>He says here it is necessary to understand what the likeness of</v>

00:39:41.840 --> 00:39:43.200
<v Speaker 3>flesh can mean?</v>

00:39:43.200 --> 00:39:46.000
<v Speaker 3>What is meant in the real image of human flesh?</v>

00:39:46.000 --> 00:39:47.840
<v Speaker 3>His flesh is our flesh.</v>

00:39:47.840 --> 00:39:50.320
<v Speaker 3>It is of the very nature of our flesh that we are</v>

00:39:50.320 --> 00:39:52.480
<v Speaker 3>tempted to sin and self will.</v>

00:39:52.480 --> 00:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Christ has taken upon himself all that flesh is heir to, but</v>

00:39:56.160 --> 00:39:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to what extent does he differ from us?</v>

00:39:58.160 --> 00:39:59.760
<v Speaker 3>First not at all.</v>

00:39:59.760 --> 00:40:02.800
<v Speaker 3>He is man as we are, he is tempted in all points,</v>

00:40:02.800 --> 00:40:06.560
<v Speaker 3>like we are, yet much more dangerously than we are.</v>

00:40:06.560 --> 00:40:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Also in his flesh was the law which is contrary to God's</v>

00:40:10.160 --> 00:40:12.720
<v Speaker 3>will. He was not the perfect good.</v>

00:40:12.720 --> 00:40:15.280
<v Speaker 3>At all times he stood in conflict.</v>

00:40:15.280 --> 00:40:19.200
<v Speaker 3>He did things which at least from outside looked like sin.</v>

00:40:19.200 --> 00:40:23.040
<v Speaker 3>He became angry, he was harsh to his mother, he escaped from</v>

00:40:23.040 --> 00:40:26.480
<v Speaker 3>his enemies, he broke the law of his people, he stirred up</v>

00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:29.440
<v Speaker 3>revolt against the rulers and religious men of his country.</v>

00:40:29.440 --> 00:40:32.400
<v Speaker 3>He must have appeared a sinner in the eyes of men.</v>

00:40:32.400 --> 00:40:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Beyond recognition, he stepped into man's sinful way of existence.</v>

00:40:36.800 --> 00:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Simply stating the sinlessness of Jesus fails if it is based upon</v>

00:40:40.640 --> 00:40:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the observable acts of Jesus.</v>

00:40:43.040 --> 00:40:46.480
<v Speaker 3>His acts take place in the likeness of flesh.</v>

00:40:46.480 --> 00:40:49.440
<v Speaker 3>They are not sinless but ambiguous.</v>

00:40:49.440 --> 00:40:53.280
<v Speaker 3>One can and should see both good and failure in them.</v>

00:40:53.280 --> 00:40:57.760
<v Speaker 3>When a person wishes to be incognito, one wrongs him by saying</v>

00:40:57.920 --> 00:41:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I have both seen you and seen through you, Kierkegaard.</v>

00:41:01.760 --> 00:41:05.520
<v Speaker 3>We should not therefore deduce the sinlessness of Jesus out of his</v>

00:41:05.680 --> 00:41:10.240
<v Speaker 3>deeds. The assertion of the sinlessness of Jesus in his deeds is</v>

00:41:10.240 --> 00:41:13.520
<v Speaker 3>not an evident moral judgment, but an assertion of faith that it</v>

00:41:13.520 --> 00:41:17.840
<v Speaker 3>is he who performs these ambiguous actions, he it is who is</v>

00:41:17.840 --> 00:41:19.440
<v Speaker 3>eternally without sin.</v>

00:41:19.440 --> 00:41:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Faith confesses that the one who is tempted is the victor, the</v>

00:41:22.720 --> 00:41:27.040
<v Speaker 3>one who struggles is perfected, the one unrighteous one is righteous, the</v>

00:41:27.040 --> 00:41:29.440
<v Speaker 3>one who is rejected is the holy one.</v>

00:41:29.440 --> 00:41:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Even the sinlessness of Jesus is a co incognito.</v>

00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Blessed is he who is not offended in me, for Matthew eleven</v>

00:41:36.080 --> 00:41:41.600
<v Speaker 3>six. So this is a tremendously dangerous quote because</v>

00:41:43.040 --> 00:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>he's accusing Jesus of personal sin, which is something that we find</v>

00:41:46.960 --> 00:41:51.360
<v Speaker 3>in modern scholars today, saying that Jesus actually sinned, but then just</v>

00:41:51.360 --> 00:41:53.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of brushing it away and saying, well, because he was God,</v>

00:41:53.760 --> 00:41:56.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, wasn't really sin and we can't understand.</v>

00:41:56.720 --> 00:42:00.240
<v Speaker 3>he gives a list of Jesus' sins in his life and says,</v>

00:42:00.240 --> 00:42:02.800
<v Speaker 3>well, yeah, I'm sure he had to do that because he became</v>

00:42:02.800 --> 00:42:06.160
<v Speaker 3>sin for us, which is a quote from scripture.</v>

00:42:06.160 --> 00:42:09.840
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that again, this goes back to one of the</v>

00:42:10.080 --> 00:42:14.800
<v Speaker 3>rank heresies we find even among Lutheran theologians today, which is that</v>

00:42:15.120 --> 00:42:19.760
<v Speaker 3>when Jesus was tempted to sin, that was an internal temptation, that</v>

00:42:19.760 --> 00:42:22.800
<v Speaker 3>he really wanted to sin, but because he didn't actually do it,</v>

00:42:22.800 --> 00:42:23.920
<v Speaker 3>he didn't sin.</v>

00:42:23.920 --> 00:42:25.680
<v Speaker 3>That's blasphemy.</v>

00:42:25.680 --> 00:42:28.400
<v Speaker 3>When Jesus was tempted, it was external.</v>

00:42:28.400 --> 00:42:30.240
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this before.</v>

00:42:30.240 --> 00:42:34.560
<v Speaker 3>When I want to do something bad that is a part of</v>

00:42:34.560 --> 00:42:40.560
<v Speaker 3>my nature, the temptation is internal, because my evil self, the the</v>

00:42:40.560 --> 00:42:44.880
<v Speaker 3>unregenerate self, desires to do that which con' is contrary to my</v>

00:42:44.880 --> 00:42:46.240
<v Speaker 3>regenerate nature.</v>

00:42:46.240 --> 00:42:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I see something, I want to do it, I'm tempted to do</v>

00:42:49.040 --> 00:42:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it. My regenerate nature gives me the power to resist that temptation</v>

00:42:54.320 --> 00:42:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and not to follow through with the sin.</v>

00:42:56.880 --> 00:43:00.160
<v Speaker 3>But the point to be made is that the desire to sin</v>

00:43:00.160 --> 00:43:01.520
<v Speaker 3>is itself sin.</v>

00:43:01.520 --> 00:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>That is internal temptation.</v>

00:43:03.600 --> 00:43:06.320
<v Speaker 3>There are also external temptations.</v>

00:43:06.320 --> 00:43:09.200
<v Speaker 3>There are some things where you know a fleeting thought pops into</v>

00:43:09.200 --> 00:43:11.840
<v Speaker 3>my head and I'm like, where did that come from?</v>

00:43:11.840 --> 00:43:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, tempting me to do something.</v>

00:43:13.360 --> 00:43:17.760
<v Speaker 3>And it's the exact opposite of anything that's it in my interest.</v>

00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we we all have these fleeting thoughts where something just pops</v>

00:43:20.320 --> 00:43:22.240
<v Speaker 3>in your head and you're like, why would I think that?</v>

00:43:22.560 --> 00:43:24.080
<v Speaker 3>that's horrible.</v>

00:43:24.080 --> 00:43:26.000
<v Speaker 3>That is external temptation.</v>

00:43:26.000 --> 00:43:28.160
<v Speaker 3>That is the devil messing with us.</v>

00:43:28.160 --> 00:43:29.840
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't happen constantly.</v>

00:43:29.840 --> 00:43:30.480
<v Speaker 3>It shouldn't.</v>

00:43:30.720 --> 00:43:33.120
<v Speaker 3>If it is happening to you constantly, you need to pray for</v>

00:43:33.440 --> 00:43:37.600
<v Speaker 3>help and for protection from the Lord and for forgiveness from a</v>

00:43:37.600 --> 00:43:40.960
<v Speaker 3>life that is putting you in a position where there are constant</v>

00:43:40.960 --> 00:43:47.440
<v Speaker 3>external temptations, but the internal temptation is according to our sinful nature.</v>

00:43:47.440 --> 00:43:52.320
<v Speaker 3>The external temptation, as Jesus faced with Satan in the wilderness, where</v>

00:43:52.320 --> 00:43:55.120
<v Speaker 3>he's saying, Eat, jump, worship.</v>

00:43:55.120 --> 00:43:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Those were external temptations.</v>

00:43:57.600 --> 00:44:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Jesus was tempted because Satan tempted him.</v>

00:44:01.440 --> 00:44:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Jesus was not tempted to do what Satan wanted, there wasn't there</v>

00:44:05.600 --> 00:44:09.120
<v Speaker 3>was never any possibility that Jesus was going to bow down before</v>

00:44:09.120 --> 00:44:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Satan. It wasn't like he considered it for a fleeting moment and</v>

00:44:12.560 --> 00:44:14.080
<v Speaker 3>then decided better of it.</v>

00:44:14.080 --> 00:44:16.720
<v Speaker 3>That would be the sort of internal temptation that you or I</v>

00:44:16.720 --> 00:44:17.440
<v Speaker 3>might face.</v>

00:44:17.440 --> 00:44:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Even with resolute faith, if Satan appeared to one of us and</v>

00:44:21.040 --> 00:44:23.040
<v Speaker 3>said, I'll give you the whole world, all you have to do</v>

00:44:23.040 --> 00:44:26.800
<v Speaker 3>is bow down before me, we would have to consider it.</v>

00:44:27.040 --> 00:44:30.240
<v Speaker 3>No matter how fleetingly, there would still be a consideration in our</v>

00:44:30.240 --> 00:44:34.080
<v Speaker 3>minds because that would be not only Satan tempting us, but us</v>

00:44:34.080 --> 00:44:36.800
<v Speaker 3>being tempted by it internally.</v>

00:44:36.800 --> 00:44:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Like that sounds like a pretty good deal.</v>

00:44:38.480 --> 00:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I would like the whole world.</v>

00:44:39.840 --> 00:44:41.520
<v Speaker 3>That's something that a pa appeals to</v>

00:44:42.480 --> 00:44:46.080
<v Speaker 3>to our vanity, appeals to our covetousness.</v>

00:44:46.080 --> 00:44:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Satan could not do that to Jesus because Jesus did not have</v>

00:44:50.640 --> 00:44:51.600
<v Speaker 3>personal sin.</v>

00:44:51.600 --> 00:44:53.200
<v Speaker 3>He did not have original sin.</v>

00:44:53.200 --> 00:44:57.760
<v Speaker 3>When he took our sins on on the cross, it was something</v>

00:44:57.760 --> 00:44:59.920
<v Speaker 3>external that he took into himself.</v>

00:44:59.920 --> 00:45:04.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not the same as him struggling with sin, which is exactly</v>

00:45:04.880 --> 00:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>what Bonhoeffer is accusing him of here.</v>

00:45:07.360 --> 00:45:09.280
<v Speaker 3>This is blasphemy.</v>

00:45:09.280 --> 00:45:10.720
<v Speaker 3>This is denying that God is God.</v>

00:45:10.720 --> 00:45:13.920
<v Speaker 3>This is saying that Jesus could sin, that Jesus did sin.</v>

00:45:13.920 --> 00:45:19.360
<v Speaker 3>If Bonhoeffer's Jesus sinned, then Bonhoeffer's Jesus isn't God.</v>

00:45:19.360 --> 00:45:19.600
In

00:45:19.600 --> 00:45:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Lutheran theology and probably also in some others, this is the distinction</v>

00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:30.960
<v Speaker 2>between the old Adam, which is inherited sin, original sin, you can</v>

00:45:30.960 --> 00:45:33.920
<v Speaker 2>use either term, and the new man in Christ</v>

00:45:36.720 --> 00:45:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Now just so we have</v>

00:45:39.200 --> 00:45:43.520
<v Speaker 2>something read in this episode that is actually sound and good instead</v>

00:45:43.520 --> 00:45:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of what we'll be reading for most of the episode, I'd like</v>

00:45:46.320 --> 00:45:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to read</v>

00:45:47.680 --> 00:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>just the end of Romans seven, which highlights exactly this point.</v>

00:45:51.680 --> 00:45:54.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the point we're making.</v>

00:45:54.640 --> 00:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am of</v>

00:45:57.680 --> 00:46:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the flesh, sold under sin, for I do not understand my own</v>

00:46:02.160 --> 00:46:05.520
<v Speaker 2>actions, for I do not do what I want, but I do</v>

00:46:05.520 --> 00:46:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the very thing I hate.</v>

00:46:07.440 --> 00:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Now if I do what I do not want, I agree with</v>

00:46:10.480 --> 00:46:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the law that it is good, so now it is no longer</v>

00:46:13.680 --> 00:46:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I who do it, but sin that dwells within me, for I</v>

00:46:17.520 --> 00:46:20.800
<v Speaker 2>know that nothing good dwells in me, that is in my flesh,</v>

00:46:21.040 --> 00:46:23.920
<v Speaker 2>for I have the desire to do what is right, but not</v>

00:46:23.920 --> 00:46:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the ability to carry it out, for I do not do the</v>

00:46:27.440 --> 00:46:30.560
<v Speaker 2>good I want, but the evil I do not want is what</v>

00:46:30.560 --> 00:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I keep on doing.</v>

00:46:32.080 --> 00:46:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Now if I do what I do not want, it is no</v>

00:46:34.720 --> 00:46:38.000
<v Speaker 2>longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.</v>

00:46:38.000 --> 00:46:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So I find it to be a law that when I want</v>

00:46:40.800 --> 00:46:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to do right, evil lies close at hand.</v>

00:46:43.840 --> 00:46:47.040
<v Speaker 2>For I delight in the law of God in my inner being,</v>

00:46:47.040 --> 00:46:50.640
<v Speaker 2>but I see in my members another law waging war against the</v>

00:46:50.640 --> 00:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>law of my mind, and making me captive to the law of</v>

00:46:53.680 --> 00:46:55.920
<v Speaker 2>sin that dwells in my members.</v>

00:46:55.920 --> 00:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body</v>

00:46:59.600 --> 00:47:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of death?</v>

00:47:00.640 --> 00:47:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord.</v>

00:47:04.080 --> 00:47:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So then I myself serve the law of God with my mind,</v>

00:47:08.240 --> 00:47:14.160
<v Speaker 2>but with my flesh I serve the law of sin.</v>

00:47:14.160 --> 00:47:20.000
<v Speaker 2>This is summarized in Reformation theology as the symbol.</v>

00:47:20.000 --> 00:47:26.800
<v Speaker 2>We are simultaneously saint and sinner, sanctified and sinful.</v>

00:47:26.800 --> 00:47:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Because as long as we live in this world, we will continue</v>

00:47:30.400 --> 00:47:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to be beset by original sin, which leads to those internal temptations,</v>

00:47:35.280 --> 00:47:36.800
<v Speaker 2>not just external.</v>

00:47:36.800 --> 00:47:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Christ again, had only the external temptation, only Satan standing there tempting</v>

00:47:42.320 --> 00:47:46.400
<v Speaker 2>him. No internal temptation, that is something we have because we are</v>

00:47:46.400 --> 00:47:51.600
<v Speaker 2>fallen. And so that is why Paul here speaking, yes, regenerate Paul</v>

00:47:51.760 --> 00:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>speaking, says that he continues to struggle with original sin because he</v>

00:47:56.480 --> 00:48:00.560
<v Speaker 2>was still a fallen human being living in this world.</v>

00:48:00.560 --> 00:48:04.480
<v Speaker 2>That's not something that you eventually reach a point in this life</v>

00:48:04.480 --> 00:48:07.040
<v Speaker 2>where original sin just disappears, you no longer have it.</v>

00:48:07.040 --> 00:48:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, through the process of sanctification, some of these temptations will be</v>

00:48:11.840 --> 00:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>put to death, which is good, daily dying, as it were, and</v>

00:48:16.960 --> 00:48:20.640
<v Speaker 2>coming alive again in your baptism as a Christian.</v>

00:48:20.640 --> 00:48:22.800
<v Speaker 2>But it will not all disappear in this life.</v>

00:48:22.800 --> 00:48:25.760
<v Speaker 2>That is, for the next life, that is something that happens in</v>

00:48:25.760 --> 00:48:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the resurrection.</v>

00:48:27.760 --> 00:48:31.840
<v Speaker 3>The last quotation I want to read from those table talks is</v>

00:48:31.840 --> 00:48:34.960
<v Speaker 3>a rejection of the resurrection.</v>

00:48:35.120 --> 00:48:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoffer says Between humiliation and exaltation lies oppressively the</v>

00:48:42.400 --> 00:48:45.520
<v Speaker 3>stark historical fact of the empty tomb.</v>

00:48:45.520 --> 00:48:48.160
<v Speaker 3>What is the meaning of the news of the empty tomb before</v>

00:48:48.160 --> 00:48:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the news of the resurrection?</v>

00:48:49.920 --> 00:48:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Is it the deciding fact of Christology?</v>

00:48:52.560 --> 00:48:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Was it really empty?</v>

00:48:54.240 --> 00:48:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it the visible evidence penetrating the incognito of the sonship of</v>

00:48:58.640 --> 00:49:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Jesus open to everyone, and therefore making faith superfluous.</v>

00:49:03.200 --> 00:49:06.960
<v Speaker 3>If it was not empty, it is then Christ not risen and</v>

00:49:06.960 --> 00:49:08.800
<v Speaker 3>our faith futile.</v>

00:49:08.800 --> 00:49:12.640
<v Speaker 3>If it was not empty, is then Christ not risen and our</v>

00:49:12.640 --> 00:49:13.600
<v Speaker 3>faith futile.</v>

00:49:13.600 --> 00:49:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It looks as though our faith in the resurrection were bound up</v>

00:49:17.040 --> 00:49:18.880
<v Speaker 3>with the news of the empty tomb.</v>

00:49:18.880 --> 00:49:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Is our faith then ultimately only faith in the empty tomb?</v>

00:49:22.400 --> 00:49:26.320
<v Speaker 3>This is and remains a final stumbling block, which the believer in</v>

00:49:26.320 --> 00:49:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Christ must learn to live with in one way or another.</v>

00:49:29.840 --> 00:49:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Empty or not empty, it remains a stumbling block.</v>

00:49:33.200 --> 00:49:35.520
<v Speaker 3>We cannot be sure of its historicity.</v>

00:49:35.520 --> 00:49:39.440
<v Speaker 3>The Bible itself shows this stumbling block when it makes clear how</v>

00:49:39.440 --> 00:49:42.400
<v Speaker 3>hard it was to prove that the disciples had not stolen the</v>

00:49:42.400 --> 00:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>body. Even here we cannot ex escape the realm of ambiguity.</v>

00:49:46.640 --> 00:49:48.880
<v Speaker 3>We cannot find a way around it.</v>

00:49:48.880 --> 00:49:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Even in the testimony of Scripture, Jesus enters in a form which</v>

00:49:52.880 --> 00:49:54.560
<v Speaker 3>is a stumbling block.</v>

00:49:54.560 --> 00:49:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Even as the risen one he does not lift his incognito, he</v>

00:49:58.240 --> 00:50:00.800
<v Speaker 3>will lift it only when he returns in glory.</v>

00:50:00.800 --> 00:50:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Then the incarnate one will no longer be the humiliated one.</v>

00:50:04.400 --> 00:50:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Then the decision over faith or unbelief is already taken.</v>

00:50:08.080 --> 00:50:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Then the humanity of God is really, and now only the glorifying</v>

00:50:12.160 --> 00:50:15.200
<v Speaker 3>of God.</v>

00:50:15.200 --> 00:50:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So again, you know, he's playing these word games that we've warned</v>

00:50:18.480 --> 00:50:23.520
<v Speaker 3>against, this big brained garbage where these guys will come along and</v>

00:50:23.520 --> 00:50:28.640
<v Speaker 3>they'll just vomit word salad at you and you're not sure what</v>

00:50:28.640 --> 00:50:31.840
<v Speaker 3>happened, but your faith is undermined as a result result of it.</v>

00:50:31.840 --> 00:50:35.920
<v Speaker 3>That's the the uncertainty and the ambiguity, which is a word he</v>

00:50:35.920 --> 00:50:36.640
<v Speaker 3>directly used.</v>

00:50:36.640 --> 00:50:38.000
<v Speaker 3>He says it's ambiguous.</v>

00:50:38.000 --> 00:50:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Did Jesus rise from the grave?</v>

00:50:39.840 --> 00:50:42.640
<v Speaker 3>There's no we can't be sure if it's historicity.</v>

00:50:42.640 --> 00:50:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Another direct denial of the creeds, another direct denial of scripture.</v>

00:50:47.520 --> 00:50:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Jesus rose from the dead.</v>

00:50:49.520 --> 00:50:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Who knows where his body wound?</v>

00:50:51.120 --> 00:50:52.720
<v Speaker 3>That's not the important part.</v>

00:50:52.720 --> 00:50:56.480
<v Speaker 3>And this is why Bonhoeffer is able to talk about these things</v>

00:50:56.480 --> 00:50:58.480
<v Speaker 3>when King had to avoid them.</v>

00:50:58.480 --> 00:51:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Because King wasn't smart enough to say, well, it doesn't really matter.</v>

00:51:02.160 --> 00:51:03.920
<v Speaker 3>The virgin birth doesn't really matter.</v>

00:51:03.920 --> 00:51:06.080
<v Speaker 3>The resurrection of the dead doesn't really matter.</v>

00:51:06.080 --> 00:51:08.720
<v Speaker 3>He denied them in his papers because that's what he had gotten</v>

00:51:08.720 --> 00:51:12.320
<v Speaker 3>from Barf and Baltman and these other demons.</v>

00:51:12.320 --> 00:51:15.600
<v Speaker 3>But he didn't know how to provide the end then.</v>

00:51:15.600 --> 00:51:19.760
<v Speaker 3>So when he went to his audience and in preaching, so called,</v>

00:51:19.760 --> 00:51:23.040
<v Speaker 3>he just left this stuff out because he didn't have the chops.</v>

00:51:23.040 --> 00:51:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer is dangerous because he basically says, Did Jesus rise from the</v>

00:51:26.560 --> 00:51:27.920
<v Speaker 3>grid? I don't know.</v>

00:51:27.920 --> 00:51:28.880
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter.</v>

00:51:28.880 --> 00:51:32.240
<v Speaker 3>He's coming back on the last day anyway, so you why worry</v>

00:51:32.240 --> 00:51:35.760
<v Speaker 3>about the historicity of this Bible stuff?</v>

00:51:36.880 --> 00:51:39.200
<v Speaker 3>that's the whole shooting match.</v>

00:51:39.520 --> 00:51:43.040
<v Speaker 3>if you can get someone to deny the creed and say, oh,</v>

00:51:43.040 --> 00:51:44.240
<v Speaker 3>but it doesn't matter.</v>

00:51:44.240 --> 00:51:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Jesus is coming back anyway.</v>

00:51:46.240 --> 00:51:47.440
<v Speaker 3>That last part is true.</v>

00:51:47.440 --> 00:51:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Jesus is coming back anyway.</v>

00:51:49.120 --> 00:51:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And when he returns to judge the quick and the dead, he</v>

00:51:52.400 --> 00:51:56.000
<v Speaker 3>will find you guilty of all of your sins because you've rejected</v>

00:51:56.000 --> 00:51:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the God who sacrificed on the cross to forgive them in the</v>

00:51:59.440 --> 00:52:00.160
<v Speaker 3>first place.</v>

00:52:00.160 --> 00:52:04.720
<v Speaker 3>The reconciliation provided on the cross to all men is not given</v>

00:52:04.720 --> 00:52:06.880
<v Speaker 3>to those then who deny it.</v>

00:52:06.880 --> 00:52:09.440
<v Speaker 3>The price was paid, but if you say, I don't want that</v>

00:52:09.440 --> 00:52:11.280
<v Speaker 3>credit, I'm gonna do it myself.</v>

00:52:11.280 --> 00:52:14.800
<v Speaker 3>When Jesus come back, he's like, Okay, here's the bill.</v>

00:52:14.800 --> 00:52:19.200
<v Speaker 3>And you're gonna spend eternity paying it in hell.</v>

00:52:19.200 --> 00:52:24.800
<v Speaker 3>So this this tricky stuff where it it sounds kind of confusing,</v>

00:52:24.800 --> 00:52:26.720
<v Speaker 3>like we said, he's a smart guy.</v>

00:52:26.720 --> 00:52:30.000
<v Speaker 3>He's writing this stuff in a manner and the speaking in a</v>

00:52:30.000 --> 00:52:32.640
<v Speaker 3>manner that will confuse most people.</v>

00:52:32.640 --> 00:52:36.720
<v Speaker 3>As Corey was saying earlier, as we've warned, when it's it's a</v>

00:52:36.720 --> 00:52:39.440
<v Speaker 3>reason that I've that we've been using the phrase all along, Jesus</v>

00:52:39.440 --> 00:52:40.800
<v Speaker 3>dust and Jesus butter.</v>

00:52:40.800 --> 00:52:44.800
<v Speaker 3>These guys will slather on the things that sound Christian to you</v>

00:52:44.960 --> 00:52:47.360
<v Speaker 3>and then say, Oh, but we can't be sure of the historicity</v>

00:52:47.360 --> 00:52:49.440
<v Speaker 3>of the resurrection.</v>

00:52:49.440 --> 00:52:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Because you swallowed their bait and went down the path with them</v>

00:52:53.760 --> 00:52:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that they're actually talking about the one true God.</v>

00:52:56.560 --> 00:52:58.880
<v Speaker 3>By the time they get to the point to say, I don't</v>

00:52:58.800 --> 00:53:00.720
<v Speaker 3>know if the tomb was empty or not, I don't know where</v>

00:53:00.720 --> 00:53:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the body went, but don't worry, it doesn't matter.</v>

00:53:03.600 --> 00:53:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Your brain is just gonna skip over the the tomb wasn't empty,</v>

00:53:07.600 --> 00:53:09.440
<v Speaker 3>or they stole the body and hid it.</v>

00:53:09.440 --> 00:53:12.560
<v Speaker 3>And just say, Well, he's talking about Jesus, and he says Jesus</v>

00:53:12.560 --> 00:53:13.840
<v Speaker 3>is coming back on the last day.</v>

00:53:13.840 --> 00:53:16.400
<v Speaker 3>So the rest must be Christian, and I'm just not going to</v>

00:53:16.400 --> 00:53:18.640
<v Speaker 3>worry too much about it because I'm not really sure what the</v>

00:53:18.640 --> 00:53:19.360
<v Speaker 3>guy said.</v>

00:53:19.680 --> 00:53:21.600
<v Speaker 3>That is a trap for your soul.</v>

00:53:21.600 --> 00:53:23.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's why these guys are so deadly.</v>

00:53:23.760 --> 00:53:28.160
<v Speaker 3>And that's why some of the worst men in religion today love</v>

00:53:28.160 --> 00:53:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoffer. Because he provides an excuse for them to deny anything they</v>

00:53:35.120 --> 00:53:38.960
<v Speaker 3>want. It's not that he's it's not that Bonhoeffer's theology is providing</v>

00:53:38.960 --> 00:53:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a script for a separate religion.</v>

00:53:42.320 --> 00:53:46.640
<v Speaker 3>He's acting as a solvent against the very foundations of the Christian</v>

00:53:46.640 --> 00:53:52.320
<v Speaker 3>faith, and then leaving this goo behind that can be reshaped by</v>

00:53:52.320 --> 00:53:55.440
<v Speaker 3>whoever comes along to form whatever new religion they want.</v>

00:53:55.440 --> 00:53:57.920
<v Speaker 3>And the thing that they're going to have in common is it's</v>

00:53:57.920 --> 00:54:00.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be loving and it's going to be neighborly, and there</v>

00:54:00.960 --> 00:54:04.240
<v Speaker 3>will only be nice noises, and there will only be clean words,</v>

00:54:04.240 --> 00:54:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and no one will ever be unhappy because they've achieved perfection in</v>

00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:11.280
<v Speaker 3>this life, because that's what God would have wanted.</v>

00:54:11.840 --> 00:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that's what always happens with all these guys.</v>

00:54:14.880 --> 00:54:19.200
<v Speaker 3>And whenever they talk about Jesus, incidentally, it no longer can be</v>

00:54:19.200 --> 00:54:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the Jesus of the creeds and confessions, because that Jesus has very</v>

00:54:23.520 --> 00:54:29.520
<v Speaker 3>particular facts in history God was born a man, God died a</v>

00:54:29.520 --> 00:54:34.240
<v Speaker 3>man, God was resurrected a man, God ascended into heaven a man.</v>

00:54:34.240 --> 00:54:35.840
<v Speaker 3>All of those are true.</v>

00:54:35.840 --> 00:54:38.880
<v Speaker 3>And if you doubt or deny any of them, you no longer</v>

00:54:38.880 --> 00:54:40.160
<v Speaker 3>have the true God.</v>

00:54:40.160 --> 00:54:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And anything else you do from that point on is meaningless noise.</v>

00:54:44.720 --> 00:54:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So these quotes are tricky and they're subtle.</v>

00:54:47.680 --> 00:54:50.560
<v Speaker 3>It's worth going back and listening to 'em or not.</v>

00:54:50.720 --> 00:54:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I Corey and I've spent a couple weeks</v>

00:54:53.280 --> 00:54:56.320
<v Speaker 3>now reading through this crap and it's vile.</v>

00:54:56.480 --> 00:54:58.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's partly vile because</v>

00:54:59.680 --> 00:55:03.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to have your guard up to such an extensive degree</v>

00:55:03.440 --> 00:55:06.080
<v Speaker 3>to see the trick that's being played.</v>

00:55:06.080 --> 00:55:08.160
<v Speaker 3>And it's not that we're being unfair.</v>

00:55:08.160 --> 00:55:10.400
<v Speaker 3>It's then when we look at the rest of the things that</v>

00:55:10.400 --> 00:55:14.160
<v Speaker 3>men like this guy say in the context of these confessions, denying</v>

00:55:14.160 --> 00:55:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the virgin birth, denying that Jesus was sinless, and therefore God, denying</v>

00:55:18.800 --> 00:55:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that he was bodily resurrected.</v>

00:55:20.480 --> 00:55:23.040
<v Speaker 3>When you strip away all those things, you're left with a false</v>

00:55:23.040 --> 00:55:26.560
<v Speaker 3>religion, but it still looks and sounds in some places like the</v>

00:55:26.560 --> 00:55:28.080
<v Speaker 3>one that we claim to hold.</v>

00:55:28.080 --> 00:55:31.040
<v Speaker 3>And that's where the destruction of our faith is is coming into</v>

00:55:31.040 --> 00:55:31.760
<v Speaker 3>play.</v>

00:55:31.760 --> 00:55:31.840
I

00:55:31.840 --> 00:55:34.960
<v Speaker 2>have to say Jesus butter really sounds like something I should be</v>

00:55:34.960 --> 00:55:38.400
<v Speaker 2>able to go into a restaurant here in the south and order.</v>

00:55:38.400 --> 00:55:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm a little disappointed.</v>

00:55:40.160 --> 00:55:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little disappointed that I have never seen it on a</v>

00:55:42.400 --> 00:55:44.880
<v Speaker 2>menu, but at the same time I feel I could be a</v>

00:55:44.880 --> 00:55:49.040
<v Speaker 2>little sacrilegious, so maybe we shouldn't do that.</v>

00:55:49.040 --> 00:55:53.280
<v Speaker 2>But Bonhoeffer in that quote that you read really admits perhaps a</v>

00:55:53.280 --> 00:55:58.080
<v Speaker 2>little more than he intends, or perhaps he was intentionally letting the</v>

00:55:58.080 --> 00:56:00.880
<v Speaker 2>mask slip for the attentive reader.</v>

00:56:00.880 --> 00:56:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Because when you hear what he said there you should think of</v>

00:56:03.760 --> 00:56:07.760
<v Speaker 2>several verses in Scripture, one of which is a verse from first</v>

00:56:08.000 --> 00:56:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Corinthians, for Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach</v>

00:56:13.600 --> 00:56:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews, and folly to Greeks, but</v>

00:56:19.120 --> 00:56:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power</v>

00:56:23.280 --> 00:56:27.680
<v Speaker 2>of God and the wisdom of God.</v>

00:56:27.680 --> 00:56:34.800
<v Speaker 2>If he is saying that Christ, as he appears in Scripture,</v>

00:56:34.800 --> 00:56:38.960
<v Speaker 2>is a stumbling block for him, which is what he's saying.</v>

00:56:38.960 --> 00:56:42.320
<v Speaker 2>He's saying that Christ is a stumbling block for the kind of</v>

00:56:42.400 --> 00:56:47.840
<v Speaker 2>quote Christian unquote that he is Well he's saying he's not a</v>

00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Christian. Because Scripture speaks of Christ being a stumbling block for the</v>

00:56:53.760 --> 00:57:00.400
<v Speaker 2>unbeliever. Christ is not a stumbling block for the believer.</v>

00:57:00.400 --> 00:57:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Christ is your Lord and Savior.</v>

00:57:02.320 --> 00:57:03.760
<v Speaker 2>He's not a stumbling block.</v>

00:57:03.760 --> 00:57:08.480
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't cause you to trip and fall.</v>

00:57:08.480 --> 00:57:12.800
<v Speaker 2>That is how He is described for those who refuse to believe,</v>

00:57:12.800 --> 00:57:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and that's why he is a stumbling block to the Jews.</v>

00:57:17.440 --> 00:57:21.680
<v Speaker 2>So he's admitting here again, as he does frequently, he is not</v>

00:57:21.680 --> 00:57:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a Christian.</v>

00:57:23.360 --> 00:57:26.960
<v Speaker 2>He is something else entirely.</v>

00:57:26.960 --> 00:57:31.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll close this particular section of this episode with a short quote</v>

00:57:31.600 --> 00:57:36.640
<v Speaker 2>from him which almost doesn't need explanation because it's so egregious, but</v>

00:57:36.640 --> 00:57:38.080
<v Speaker 2>here it is in its entirety.</v>

00:57:38.960 --> 00:57:44.240
<v Speaker 2>The New Testament contains no ethical precept which we may or even</v>

00:57:44.240 --> 00:57:48.400
<v Speaker 2>can adopt literally.</v>

00:57:48.400 --> 00:57:53.520
<v Speaker 2>This appears many times in his writing in his writings in various</v>

00:57:53.520 --> 00:58:00.160
<v Speaker 2>forms, where he outright denies that there are actual principles or ethical</v>

00:58:00.160 --> 00:58:03.680
<v Speaker 2>rules in Scripture, and in other places he says that God is</v>

00:58:03.680 --> 00:58:08.320
<v Speaker 2>arbitrary Because he says that the ethical principles that we see in</v>

00:58:08.320 --> 00:58:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Scripture aren't universal, aren't eternal, they are simply tools in God's hands,</v>

00:58:13.760 --> 00:58:17.840
<v Speaker 2>his words, that he will use and then abandon when he is</v>

00:58:17.840 --> 00:58:18.880
<v Speaker 2>done with them.</v>

00:58:19.280 --> 00:58:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Which again is a denial of the nature of God.</v>

00:58:21.440 --> 00:58:25.840
<v Speaker 2>It's saying that God is changing, that God is mutable, it's saying</v>

00:58:25.840 --> 00:58:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that God isn't truth.</v>

00:58:27.840 --> 00:58:30.800
<v Speaker 2>You cannot be a Christian and say these sorts of things Of</v>

00:58:30.800 --> 00:58:36.640
<v Speaker 2>things. And Scripture is, for the record, full of ethical precepts that</v>

00:58:36.640 --> 00:58:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you can in fact adopt literally.</v>

00:58:39.360 --> 00:58:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Scripture is very clear about what they are, and that they are</v>

00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:47.200
<v Speaker 2>eternal. We've gone over this before the different kinds of law in</v>

00:58:47.200 --> 00:58:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Scripture. There's the moral law, which is binding for all men at</v>

00:58:52.560 --> 00:58:55.040
<v Speaker 2>all places, all times.</v>

00:58:55.040 --> 00:58:59.840
<v Speaker 2>There is the civil law, which was binding on Old Testament Israel</v>

00:59:00.000 --> 00:59:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and is at least persuasive for us today, because it is God</v>

00:59:04.080 --> 00:59:09.280
<v Speaker 2>saying, This is permissible to do in reaction to this other thing.</v>

00:59:09.520 --> 00:59:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And so that is the scope of what is permissible given by</v>

00:59:13.520 --> 00:59:14.640
<v Speaker 2>God in the civil law.</v>

00:59:14.640 --> 00:59:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the ceremonial law, which does not apply to modern</v>

00:59:18.240 --> 00:59:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Christians. That was for Old Testament Israel to set them apart from</v>

00:59:21.600 --> 00:59:24.080
<v Speaker 2>their apart from their neighbors, and so yes you're allowed to eat</v>

00:59:24.080 --> 00:59:29.760
<v Speaker 2>shellfish or wear clothing with multiple kinds of cloth, etcetera.</v>

00:59:29.760 --> 00:59:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Those things those gotchas that internet atheists so love are complete nonsense</v>

00:59:35.280 --> 00:59:41.440
<v Speaker 2>if you actually understand the nature of what is uppercase law, uppercase</v>

00:59:41.440 --> 00:59:45.360
<v Speaker 2>L law, or lowercase L law in the Old Testament.</v>

00:59:45.360 --> 00:59:49.360
<v Speaker 2>So go ahead and wrap your shrimp in bacon, go wild, have</v>

00:59:49.360 --> 00:59:50.160
<v Speaker 2>fun.</v>

00:59:51.280 --> 00:59:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Just don't wear polyester underwear because that kills your T levels.</v>

00:59:55.040 --> 00:59:56.560
<v Speaker 2>That's actually the one we should keep.</v>

00:59:56.560 --> 00:59:59.680
<v Speaker 2>We should uh just have a a sort of a modern version</v>

00:59:59.680 --> 01:00:02.480
<v Speaker 2>for Christians of the multiple types of cloth one.</v>

01:00:02.480 --> 01:00:05.600
<v Speaker 2>It's don't wear synthetics because they're horrible for you.</v>

01:00:05.600 --> 01:00:08.320
<v Speaker 2>At least don't wear them around sensitive parts of the body that</v>

01:00:08.320 --> 01:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>absorb them.</v>

01:00:09.600 --> 01:00:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no no seed oils.</v>

01:00:11.680 --> 01:00:14.480
<v Speaker 3>we need a new set of Levitical laws.</v>

01:00:15.760 --> 01:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>So the next set of quotes that we want to get into</v>

01:00:18.480 --> 01:00:23.440
<v Speaker 3>most of them are going to come from Bonofer's letters from prison.</v>

01:00:23.440 --> 01:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>He had been imprisoned at this point as part of a plot</v>

01:00:26.880 --> 01:00:29.360
<v Speaker 3>to murder the Chancellor of Germany.</v>

01:00:29.680 --> 01:00:30.000
We should

01:00:30.400 --> 01:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>note though before we mention that he at this point well it</v>

01:00:35.360 --> 01:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>depends on which point in the letters because initially he was in</v>

01:00:40.800 --> 01:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>prison because</v>

01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>he was well he wasn't really suspected it was known that he</v>

01:00:47.040 --> 01:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>was engaging in corruption with regard to his military office, which that</v>

01:00:51.200 --> 01:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>is worth noting.</v>

01:00:52.480 --> 01:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>He was working in the military intelligence of National Socialist Germany.</v>

01:00:56.960 --> 01:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>He got into that by another gentleman, I don't think I'll bother</v>

01:01:00.960 --> 01:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>with his name because he's not really relevant to this episode.</v>

01:01:05.600 --> 01:01:09.040
<v Speaker 2>N also not a good man, but he was part of the</v>

01:01:09.040 --> 01:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>resistance movement, and he got Bonhoeff to be involved in that, and</v>

01:01:12.720 --> 01:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>so he wound up basically running messages, helping with communication, including across</v>

01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>enemy lines to the Allies, later on, and</v>

01:01:25.840 --> 01:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>so he was using his government office to directly oppose the government.</v>

01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps not quite rising to the level of treason until he started</v>

01:01:36.800 --> 01:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>communicating with belligerents, of course, then it was treason, and then he</v>

01:01:41.600 --> 01:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>compounded it by becoming involved in an assassination plot.</v>

01:01:47.040 --> 01:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So initially he was only held in basically a standard prison in</v>

01:01:51.440 --> 01:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Tegel in Berlin.</v>

01:01:54.080 --> 01:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I believe yes, in Berlin.</v>

01:01:55.840 --> 01:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I've actually seen the one of the locations, but he was then</v>

01:01:59.200 --> 01:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>later on moved to one of the concentration camps when it became</v>

01:02:03.440 --> 01:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>clear that he was involved in the assassination plot.</v>

01:02:06.720 --> 01:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>And so many of the letters we see initially, because he was</v>

01:02:09.600 --> 01:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>just allowed to write freely Write freely while he was in the</v>

01:02:12.400 --> 01:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>normal prison.</v>

01:02:13.200 --> 01:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>He could receive visitors, his fiance came and met with him, his</v>

01:02:16.880 --> 01:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>parents came and met with him, he received packages, he was given,</v>

01:02:20.880 --> 01:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>obviously, plenty of ink and paper, and so you have to bear</v>

01:02:25.760 --> 01:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in mind just a little bit of the timeline and that background</v>

01:02:29.040 --> 01:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>information that he was actually involved in the military intelligence at the</v>

01:02:34.880 --> 01:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>time. And so he was effectively acting as a spy and became</v>

01:02:40.560 --> 01:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a traitor.</v>

01:02:44.800 --> 01:02:45.040
And

01:02:45.040 --> 01:02:49.840
<v Speaker 3>that's why the intro that we did relating this episode to the</v>

01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>prior episodes in the history of World War Two.</v>

01:02:53.600 --> 01:02:57.600
<v Speaker 3>If you believe the current historic narrative, then sure.</v>

01:02:57.600 --> 01:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, every Christian obviously would betray Germany because betraying Germany was</v>

01:03:03.840 --> 01:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>service to God.</v>

01:03:05.040 --> 01:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>That that's literally what we're told today.</v>

01:03:07.520 --> 01:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>The only good Germans were the ones who betrayed the government because</v>

01:03:11.680 --> 01:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the government was evil.</v>

01:03:13.120 --> 01:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's the dividing line.</v>

01:03:14.880 --> 01:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the that's the moral line that exists and it's a lens</v>

01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:23.920
<v Speaker 3>through which everything that we read about in these periods must be</v>

01:03:23.920 --> 01:03:25.440
<v Speaker 3>read, must be viewed.</v>

01:03:25.440 --> 01:03:28.400
<v Speaker 3>You cannot understand anything without looking</v>

01:03:29.360 --> 01:03:32.000
<v Speaker 3>in one direction or the other through that lens.</v>

01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Either the German government in 1943 was evil or it was rightful.</v>

01:03:37.840 --> 01:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>And if it was evil, then there's one set of rules.</v>

01:03:41.040 --> 01:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And if it was the rightful government, then there's another set of</v>

01:03:43.520 --> 01:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>rules. So we're not going to revisit what we said a few</v>

01:03:46.640 --> 01:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago about the Holocaust, but the reason that he is held</v>

01:03:51.280 --> 01:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>up as a hero today is because we are told to believe</v>

01:03:55.440 --> 01:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>that the Germans were evil.</v>

01:03:57.360 --> 01:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So you you gotta you gotta pick one of those before you</v>

01:04:01.040 --> 01:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>can have an opinion about a man being locked up in prison</v>

01:04:04.400 --> 01:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>for spying on his government.</v>

01:04:07.040 --> 01:04:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Here's one of the things that he had to say while he</v>

01:04:09.200 --> 01:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>was sitting there in prison.</v>

01:04:10.960 --> 01:04:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoffer writes, What keeps gnawing at me is the question what is</v>

01:04:15.920 --> 01:04:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Christianity or who is Christ actually for us today?</v>

01:04:19.920 --> 01:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>The age when we could tell people with the words, whether the</v>

01:04:23.520 --> 01:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>theological or with pious words, is past, as is the age of</v>

01:04:27.680 --> 01:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>inwardness and of conscience, and that means the age of religion altogether.</v>

01:04:32.400 --> 01:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>We are approaching a completely religionless age.</v>

01:04:35.680 --> 01:04:39.360
<v Speaker 3>People as they are now simply cannot be religious anymore.</v>

01:04:39.360 --> 01:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Even those who honestly describe themselves as religious aren't really practicing at</v>

01:04:43.760 --> 01:04:48.640
<v Speaker 3>all. They're presumably means something quite different by quote unquote religious, but</v>

01:04:48.640 --> 01:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>our entire nineteen hundred years of Christian preaching and theology are built</v>

01:04:52.560 --> 01:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>on the religious a priority in human beings.</v>

01:04:56.960 --> 01:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Christianity has always been a form, perhaps the per</v>

01:05:02.320 --> 01:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>sorry to laugh in the middle of this, but I'm just I'm</v>

01:05:04.560 --> 01:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>staggered by how evil this is.</v>

01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Quote unquote Christianity has always been a form, parentheses, perhaps the true</v>

01:05:11.600 --> 01:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>form of quote unquote religion.</v>

01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Yet if it becomes the obvious one day that this is a</v>

01:05:17.120 --> 01:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>priority does not exist, then it has been a historically conditioned and</v>

01:05:21.600 --> 01:05:23.840
<v Speaker 3>transitory form of human expression.</v>

01:05:23.840 --> 01:05:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Then people really will become radically religionless, and I believe that is</v>

01:05:27.840 --> 01:05:29.440
<v Speaker 3>already more or less the case.</v>

01:05:29.440 --> 01:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Why, for example, doesn't this war provoke a religious reaction, like all</v>

01:05:33.200 --> 01:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the previous ones?</v>

01:05:34.320 --> 01:05:37.520
<v Speaker 3>What does that then mean for quote unquote Christianity?</v>

01:05:37.520 --> 01:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>The foundations are being pulled out from under all that quote unquote</v>

01:05:40.880 --> 01:05:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Christianity has previously been for us, and the only people among whom</v>

01:05:45.040 --> 01:05:47.840
<v Speaker 3>we might end up in terms of quote unquote religion are the</v>

01:05:47.840 --> 01:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>last of the knights, or a few intellectually dishonest people.</v>

01:05:51.440 --> 01:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Are these supposed to be the chosen few?</v>

01:05:53.760 --> 01:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Are we supposed to fall all over preciously this dubious lot of</v>

01:05:57.520 --> 01:06:01.280
<v Speaker 3>people in our zeal or our disappointment?</v>

01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Or woe and try to peddle our wares to them?</v>

01:06:04.560 --> 01:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Or should we do we jump on a few unfortunates in their</v>

01:06:07.200 --> 01:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>hour of weakness and commit, so to speak, religious rape?</v>

01:06:10.800 --> 01:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>If we are unwilling to do any of that, then we eventually</v>

01:06:13.920 --> 01:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>must judge that even the Western form of Christianity to be only</v>

01:06:17.360 --> 01:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>a preliminary stage of a complete absence of religion?</v>

01:06:21.360 --> 01:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>What kind of situation emerges for us for the church?</v>

01:06:24.240 --> 01:06:27.680
<v Speaker 3>How can Christ become Lord of the religionless as well?</v>

01:06:27.680 --> 01:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Is there such a thing as a religionless Christian?</v>

01:06:30.560 --> 01:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>If religion is only the garb in which Christianity is clothed, and</v>

01:06:34.400 --> 01:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>this garb has looked very different in different ages, what then is</v>

01:06:38.080 --> 01:06:39.840
<v Speaker 3>religionless Christianity?</v>

01:06:39.840 --> 01:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Barf, who is the one to have begun thinking along these lines,</v>

01:06:43.440 --> 01:06:47.040
<v Speaker 3>nevertheless did not pursue these thoughts all the way, did not think</v>

01:06:47.040 --> 01:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>them through, but ended up with a positivism of revelation, which in</v>

01:06:51.120 --> 01:06:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the end essentially remained a restoration.</v>

01:06:53.440 --> 01:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>For the working person or any person who is without religion, nothing</v>

01:06:56.960 --> 01:06:58.720
<v Speaker 3>decisive has been gained here.</v>

01:06:58.720 --> 01:07:01.840
<v Speaker 3>The questions to be answered would be what does a church or</v>

01:07:01.840 --> 01:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>congregation, a sermon, a liturgy, a Christian life mean in a religionless</v>

01:07:06.240 --> 01:07:09.840
<v Speaker 3>world? How do we talk about God without religion, that is, without</v>

01:07:09.840 --> 01:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the temporally conditioned presuppositions of metaphysics, the inner life and so on?</v>

01:07:14.480 --> 01:07:17.360
<v Speaker 3>How do we speak or perhaps how can we no longer speak</v>

01:07:17.360 --> 01:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the way we used to in a worldly way about quote unquote</v>

01:07:20.720 --> 01:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>God? So So this again is consistent with something that King had</v>

01:07:26.320 --> 01:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about as well.</v>

01:07:27.600 --> 01:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>And frankly, it's also consistent with something that Corey and I talk</v>

01:07:31.040 --> 01:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>about today.</v>

01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>But again, in completely opposite directions.</v>

01:07:36.080 --> 01:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>When we on Stone Choir talk about the world today being a</v>

01:07:39.280 --> 01:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>religionless one, one in which God is not visible in life in</v>

01:07:44.400 --> 01:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>a in a godly fashion, we certainly see God's actions in everything's</v>

01:07:48.320 --> 01:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>everything every day.</v>

01:07:49.920 --> 01:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>We do not see the will of God typically being acted out</v>

01:07:54.160 --> 01:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>by people in the world.</v>

01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>That's one of our chief complaints on this podcast.</v>

01:07:58.640 --> 01:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>The difference in our response to Barf's response and to Bonhoeffer's response</v>

01:08:04.400 --> 01:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>is that they say, okay, well, I guess God's dead, so what</v>

01:08:07.040 --> 01:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>do we do now?</v>

01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:10.800
<v Speaker 3>If there's no religion, if there's no thought of any religion at</v>

01:08:10.800 --> 01:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>all, and again, when he's putting religion and quotes in Christianity in</v>

01:08:13.840 --> 01:08:17.360
<v Speaker 3>quotes, that goes back to something we've talked about in another previous</v>

01:08:17.360 --> 01:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>episode where we have we have this notion that religion itself is</v>

01:08:21.680 --> 01:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>a manifestation of human will, that all religions are man-made.</v>

01:08:25.760 --> 01:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Remember that was in that was in some of King's papers.</v>

01:08:28.240 --> 01:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>That was one of King's very clear predicates, that all religions are</v>

01:08:32.080 --> 01:08:37.200
<v Speaker 3>man-made, and that the various forms of quote unquote religion are downstream</v>

01:08:37.200 --> 01:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>from some inherent wellspring of the human nature.</v>

01:08:41.200 --> 01:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>And so sometimes you have a religion that's better, sometimes you have</v>

01:08:44.160 --> 01:08:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a religion that's worse, but they're all fundamentally humanist at their heart.</v>

01:08:48.800 --> 01:08:50.640
<v Speaker 3>That's antithetical to Christianity.</v>

01:08:50.640 --> 01:08:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Christianity comes from God.</v>

01:08:52.240 --> 01:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Christianity is found in Scripture, it's delivered us through the church by</v>

01:08:55.600 --> 01:08:57.680
<v Speaker 3>faithful teachers in Scripture.</v>

01:08:57.680 --> 01:09:00.080
<v Speaker 3>When he tears all those things away and say, Well, we have</v>

01:09:00.080 --> 01:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>this godless world now, so how do we talk about doing good</v>

01:09:02.880 --> 01:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>things without talking about God?</v>

01:09:05.200 --> 01:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>That gets back to what we were saying earlier.</v>

01:09:07.360 --> 01:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want to talk about Christ anymore.</v>

01:09:11.280 --> 01:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>he wants to still do the good things, to solve whatever wisdom,</v>

01:09:15.120 --> 01:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever love, without actually having it rooted in obedience to God, in</v>

01:09:20.800 --> 01:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>immediate obedience, which is what we talk about all the time.</v>

01:09:24.480 --> 01:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>When I talk about obeying God, there's an immediacy to my knowledge</v>

01:09:29.040 --> 01:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>that what I am trying to do is from Scripture.</v>

01:09:32.320 --> 01:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>It's what God's telling me.</v>

01:09:33.760 --> 01:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>And I'm doing it because God told me to do it.</v>

01:09:36.400 --> 01:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Or I'm failing to do it in spite of what God told</v>

01:09:38.720 --> 01:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>me to do.</v>

01:09:39.280 --> 01:09:40.400
<v Speaker 3>That's the law.</v>

01:09:40.400 --> 01:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And the gospel is that I'm forgiven even for having failed.</v>

01:09:43.600 --> 01:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Because God has revealed that in spite of our failings he loves</v>

01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:52.080
<v Speaker 3>us and gave us a physical Christ in history two thousand years</v>

01:09:52.080 --> 01:09:55.440
<v Speaker 3>ago who died and was raised from the dead and walked out</v>

01:09:55.440 --> 01:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>of the tomb, so that our sins would be forgiven and we</v>

01:09:59.120 --> 01:10:01.680
<v Speaker 3>would know that it was true.</v>

01:10:01.680 --> 01:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>These men want a religion where none of that is necessary.</v>

01:10:05.360 --> 01:10:08.160
<v Speaker 3>They want to just strip out the religion and strip out the</v>

01:10:08.160 --> 01:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>metaphysics and strip out all the spiritual stuff and say, you know</v>

01:10:12.080 --> 01:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>what, let's just have the humanist thing because in you know after</v>

01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>1900 years of the church, we're now to the point where we've</v>

01:10:19.040 --> 01:10:20.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of perfected it.</v>

01:10:20.160 --> 01:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>We can, we can strip away those mythologies and that embarrassing antiquated</v>

01:10:24.720 --> 01:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>stuff and just have the raw humanist form of this thing.</v>

01:10:29.040 --> 01:10:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that's what plays out in all these things, and it's the undercurrent</v>

01:10:31.840 --> 01:10:33.200
<v Speaker 3>of all of his comments.</v>

01:10:33.200 --> 01:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And so near the end of his life, just two years before</v>

01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna be executed, he's basically he's saying that same thing Nietzsche</v>

01:10:41.280 --> 01:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>says he's saying God is dead.</v>

01:10:43.040 --> 01:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>What now?</v>

01:10:44.160 --> 01:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And there's a there's a positive way you could read some of</v>

01:10:47.920 --> 01:10:50.560
<v Speaker 3>this as I said, like these are some of our concerns and</v>

01:10:50.560 --> 01:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>in bits and pieces too.</v>

01:10:52.400 --> 01:10:53.440
<v Speaker 3>But his ultimate concern is</v>

01:10:54.400 --> 01:10:57.680
<v Speaker 3>without God we still need to cope going with some sort of</v>

01:10:57.680 --> 01:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>religious project.</v>

01:10:58.720 --> 01:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>So what's the new religious project gonna look like?</v>

01:11:01.920 --> 01:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>That's the exact opposite of Christianity.</v>

01:11:06.080 --> 01:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>The next quote we have is also from his letters while he</v>

01:11:10.240 --> 01:11:14.400
<v Speaker 2>was in prison written to Aberhard Bethka.</v>

01:11:14.400 --> 01:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>He wrote many of the particularly wicked things he wrote to this</v>

01:11:19.040 --> 01:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>younger gentleman.</v>

01:11:21.920 --> 01:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>A few more words about religionlessness.</v>

01:11:24.880 --> 01:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>You probably remember Boltman's essay on demythologizing the New Testament</v>

01:11:29.680 --> 01:11:33.200
<v Speaker 2>My opinion of it today would be that he went not too</v>

01:11:33.200 --> 01:11:36.560
<v Speaker 2>far, as most people thought, but rather not far enough.</v>

01:11:36.800 --> 01:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not only mythol it's not only mythological concepts like miracles, ascension,</v>

01:11:41.840 --> 01:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and so on, which in principle can't be separated from concepts of</v>

01:11:45.520 --> 01:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>God, faith, etcetera exclamation point, that are problematic, but religious concepts as</v>

01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>such. You can't separate God from the miracles, as Boltman thinks.</v>

01:11:56.640 --> 01:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Instead, you must be able to interpret and proclaim them both non</v>

01:12:01.600 --> 01:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>religiously. Boltmann's approach is still basically liberal, that is, it cuts the</v>

01:12:06.640 --> 01:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>gospel short.</v>

01:12:08.240 --> 01:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Whereas I'm trying to think theologically.</v>

01:12:11.280 --> 01:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>What then does it mean to interpret religiously?</v>

01:12:14.960 --> 01:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>It means, in my opinion, to speak metaphysically, on the one hand,</v>

01:12:19.360 --> 01:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>and on the other hand, individualistically, neither way is appropriate, either for</v>

01:12:24.720 --> 01:12:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the biblical message or for people to day.</v>

01:12:27.360 --> 01:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't the individualistic question of saving our personal souls almost faded away</v>

01:12:32.160 --> 01:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>for most of us Isn't it our impression that there are really</v>

01:12:36.240 --> 01:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>more important things than this question?</v>

01:12:38.480 --> 01:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps not more important than this matter, but certainly more important than</v>

01:12:42.240 --> 01:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the question exclamation point question mark question mark.</v>

01:12:46.160 --> 01:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I know it sounds outrageous to say that, but after all, isn't</v>

01:12:49.600 --> 01:12:51.440
<v Speaker 2>it fundamentally biblical?</v>

01:12:51.440 --> 01:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Does the question of saving one's soul even come up in the</v>

01:12:54.160 --> 01:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Old Testament?</v>

01:12:55.360 --> 01:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Isn't God's righteousness and kingdom on earth the center of everything?</v>

01:12:59.280 --> 01:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>And isn't Romans three, verse twenty four and following, the culmination of</v>

01:13:03.680 --> 01:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the view that God alone is righteous, rather than an individualistic doctrine</v>

01:13:07.680 --> 01:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of salvation?</v>

01:13:09.120 --> 01:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>What matters is not the beyond but this world, how it is</v>

01:13:12.480 --> 01:13:16.960
<v Speaker 2>created and preserved, is given laws, reconciled and renewed.</v>

01:13:16.960 --> 01:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>What is beyond this world is meant in the gospel to be</v>

01:13:20.720 --> 01:13:25.600
<v Speaker 2>there for this world, not in the anthropocentric sense of liberal, mystical,</v>

01:13:25.600 --> 01:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>pietistic ethical theology, but in the biblical sense of the creation and</v>

01:13:30.480 --> 01:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.</v>

01:13:34.800 --> 01:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Bart was the first theologian, to his great and lasting credit, to</v>

01:13:39.040 --> 01:13:41.200
<v Speaker 2>begin the critique of religion.</v>

01:13:41.200 --> 01:13:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But he then put in its place a positivist doctrine of revelation</v>

01:13:44.640 --> 01:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>that says, in effect, like it or lump it, whether it's the</v>

01:13:48.400 --> 01:13:52.960
<v Speaker 2>virgin birth, the Trinity, or anything else, all are equally significant and</v>

01:13:52.960 --> 01:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>necessary parts of the whole, which must be swallowed whole or not</v>

01:13:56.240 --> 01:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>at all.</v>

01:13:56.880 --> 01:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>That's not biblical.</v>

01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>There are degrees of cognition and degrees of significance.</v>

01:14:03.040 --> 01:14:07.920
<v Speaker 2>That means an arcane discipline must be re-established through which the mysteries</v>

01:14:07.920 --> 01:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Christian faith are sheltered against profanation.</v>

01:14:11.600 --> 01:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>The positivism of revelation is too easygoing, since in the end, it</v>

01:14:16.400 --> 01:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>sets up a law of faith and tears up what is, through</v>

01:14:19.600 --> 01:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Christ's becoming flesh, exclamation point, a gift for us.</v>

01:14:23.760 --> 01:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Now the church stands in the place of religion, that in itself</v>

01:14:27.760 --> 01:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>is biblical.</v>

01:14:28.640 --> 01:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But the world is left to its own devices, as it were</v>

01:14:31.280 --> 01:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>to rely on itself.</v>

01:14:32.800 --> 01:14:34.240
<v Speaker 2>That is the error.</v>

01:14:34.240 --> 01:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>At the moment I am thinking about how the concepts of repentance,</v>

01:14:37.440 --> 01:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>faith, justification, rebirth, and sanctification should be reinterpreted in a worldly way,</v>

01:14:43.360 --> 01:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>in the old testament sense, and in the sense of John 14,</v>

01:14:47.200 --> 01:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll write you more about it.</v>

01:14:53.520 --> 01:14:56.960
<v Speaker 2>This is really just a doubling down on things that we have</v>

01:14:56.960 --> 01:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>seen in some of the previous quotes from Bonhoeffer.</v>

01:15:03.600 --> 01:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>He rejects the Christian religion piece by piece in this quote.</v>

01:15:10.720 --> 01:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>He is constructing an alternate religion.</v>

01:15:16.480 --> 01:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>He is not dealing with Christianity, he is not dealing with theology</v>

01:15:20.640 --> 01:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in the proper sense of dealing with God, because theology properly references</v>

01:15:25.680 --> 01:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the one true God.</v>

01:15:28.240 --> 01:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Because he doesn't believe it.</v>

01:15:30.240 --> 01:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>He thinks that these things are pure myth, they are mythology, it</v>

01:15:34.080 --> 01:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter if they're true or false, he doesn't care at all.</v>

01:15:37.040 --> 01:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>He's not dealing with the empirical.</v>

01:15:39.520 --> 01:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Christianity makes empirical claims.</v>

01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Christianity says that God became incarnate.</v>

01:15:45.360 --> 01:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Christianity says that God died in the cross.</v>

01:15:48.400 --> 01:15:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Christianity says that God rose again on the third day.</v>

01:15:52.320 --> 01:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Those are empirical claims.</v>

01:15:54.960 --> 01:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>If those are false, Christianity is false.</v>

01:15:59.440 --> 01:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>He is He is saying here that those don't matter.</v>

01:16:03.360 --> 01:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>These things don't matter.</v>

01:16:04.720 --> 01:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>That's not what Christianity is.</v>

01:16:06.080 --> 01:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>That's not what his Christianity is.</v>

01:16:08.720 --> 01:16:14.400
<v Speaker 2>His Christianity is something totally alien to Scripture, something totally alien</v>

01:16:15.280 --> 01:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to the Christian faith.</v>

01:16:17.680 --> 01:16:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And he attributes it to the very men we've mentioned previously.</v>

01:16:23.520 --> 01:16:27.520
<v Speaker 2>These men are all of one mind Because they all have one</v>

01:16:27.520 --> 01:16:31.760
<v Speaker 2>animating intelligence, as we have pointed out many times before.</v>

01:16:31.760 --> 01:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>This stuff comes from the pit of hell.</v>

01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And as mentioned at the beginning, The problem here is that I</v>

01:16:40.480 --> 01:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>rattled off many words that undoubtedly sounded Christian to you.</v>

01:16:45.520 --> 01:16:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Because they are words that are used in Christianity, they are words</v>

01:16:48.880 --> 01:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that relate to the Christian faith, but they are not Christian when</v>

01:16:52.960 --> 01:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>they are coming from this man's pen, because they are not Christian</v>

01:16:56.880 --> 01:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>in this man's mind, because he's not a Christian.</v>

01:17:01.360 --> 01:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>And so just because someone tells you crucified, crucifixion, resurrection, salvation, justification,</v>

01:17:09.040 --> 01:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>just because someone uses these words does not mean that he is</v>

01:17:12.720 --> 01:17:18.720
<v Speaker 2>a Christian, because again, Satan can quote Scripture.</v>

01:17:18.720 --> 01:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Satan quoting scripture doesn't mean that he believes it.</v>

01:17:22.480 --> 01:17:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, of course, he believes it in quite frankly, a more real</v>

01:17:28.400 --> 01:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>sense than Bonhoeffer did.</v>

01:17:30.800 --> 01:17:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Does, well, perhaps he believes it now.</v>

01:17:34.240 --> 01:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>But Satan knows it's true.</v>

01:17:37.040 --> 01:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Satan doesn't trust it.</v>

01:17:39.040 --> 01:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>It's that the difference between Notitia, Ascensus, and Fiducia, as we've gone</v>

01:17:45.440 --> 01:17:49.120
<v Speaker 2>over at least once before in a previous episode.</v>

01:17:49.120 --> 01:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>These are the levels of knowledge, because again, Christian doctrine, Christianity, is</v>

01:17:54.720 --> 01:17:56.400
<v Speaker 2>a matter of truth claims.</v>

01:17:57.600 --> 01:17:57.840
I

01:17:57.840 --> 01:18:01.040
<v Speaker 3>want to reread just a small bit of this because it's I</v>

01:18:01.040 --> 01:18:06.400
<v Speaker 3>think it's really the heart of how evil this letter is.</v>

01:18:06.400 --> 01:18:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Bonhoeffer writes, hasn't the individualistic question of saving our personal souls almost</v>

01:18:12.320 --> 01:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>faded away for most of us?</v>

01:18:14.240 --> 01:18:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Isn't our impression that there are really more important things than this</v>

01:18:17.360 --> 01:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>question, perhaps not more important than this matter, but certainly more important</v>

01:18:20.960 --> 01:18:22.400
<v Speaker 3>than this question?</v>

01:18:22.400 --> 01:18:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I know it sounds a bit outrageous to say that, but after</v>

01:18:25.680 --> 01:18:28.560
<v Speaker 3>all, isn't it fundamentally biblical?</v>

01:18:28.560 --> 01:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Does the question of saving one's soul even come up in the</v>

01:18:32.240 --> 01:18:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament?</v>

01:18:33.840 --> 01:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the books that Corey and I point to quite</v>

01:18:36.800 --> 01:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>often, I think has the perfect response to this whole paragraph.</v>

01:18:40.800 --> 01:18:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Job nineteen twenty-seven twenty-five through twenty-seven, Job says, For I know that</v>

01:18:46.560 --> 01:18:50.320
<v Speaker 3>my redeemer lives, and that at last he will stand upon the</v>

01:18:50.320 --> 01:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>earth, and after my skin has thus been destroyed, yet in my</v>

01:18:54.560 --> 01:18:58.720
<v Speaker 3>flesh I shall see God, whom I shall see for myself, and</v>

01:18:58.720 --> 01:19:04.000
<v Speaker 3>my eyes shall behold and not another, my heart faints within me.</v>

01:19:04.000 --> 01:19:07.360
<v Speaker 3>So this is Job, in what is almost certainly the oldest book</v>

01:19:07.360 --> 01:19:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in the Old Testament, saying quite clearly he knows that his Redeemer</v>

01:19:12.720 --> 01:19:17.920
<v Speaker 3>lives, he knows that his flesh which will die will be resurrected,</v>

01:19:17.920 --> 01:19:20.640
<v Speaker 3>and that is his joy.</v>

01:19:20.640 --> 01:19:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Bonoffer knew this.</v>

01:19:22.320 --> 01:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Christians know this.</v>

01:19:23.760 --> 01:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>One of the most beautiful hymns that we have is I know</v>

01:19:25.920 --> 01:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>that my redeemer lives.</v>

01:19:27.520 --> 01:19:27.920
<v Speaker 3>It is</v>

01:19:29.360 --> 01:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the confession of the Christian faith.</v>

01:19:31.440 --> 01:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>And it's a direct repudiation of a man who says, Is that</v>

01:19:34.480 --> 01:19:35.840
<v Speaker 3>even in the Old Testament?</v>

01:19:35.840 --> 01:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>That was the sincere question of all of this.</v>

01:19:38.400 --> 01:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>And so at the end, when he gets again to denying the</v>

01:19:41.040 --> 01:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Trinity and the virgin birth and all these other things, I think</v>

01:19:44.720 --> 01:19:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the question of particular knowledge of specific doctrinal facts, as Corey just</v>

01:19:51.040 --> 01:19:53.120
<v Speaker 3>highlighted, is important.</v>

01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:57.280
<v Speaker 3>When I was on Myth of the Twentieth Century, I was discussing</v>

01:19:57.760 --> 01:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>forgiveness with Adam, the thief on the cross came up, and I</v>

01:20:01.440 --> 01:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>pointed out Adam was asking about forgiveness.</v>

01:20:04.320 --> 01:20:06.640
<v Speaker 3>can someone on death row really receive forgiveness?</v>

01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I said, Well Well, good news, the Bible actually has a passage</v>

01:20:11.280 --> 01:20:16.480
<v Speaker 3>about Jesus in that precise situation to highlight that there are certain</v>

01:20:16.480 --> 01:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>principles at play that come into salvation as Corey said, and is</v>

01:20:20.480 --> 01:20:24.400
<v Speaker 3>frankly to be to be clear, as Bonhoeffer also says, it is</v>

01:20:24.400 --> 01:20:27.360
<v Speaker 3>not intellectual ascent that saves us.</v>

01:20:27.360 --> 01:20:32.240
<v Speaker 3>However, the thief on the cross, although he could not have explained</v>

01:20:32.240 --> 01:20:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the Trinity, had Jesus explained the Trinity to him in whatever manner</v>

01:20:36.720 --> 01:20:40.400
<v Speaker 3>he saw fit, the thief on the cross would have said, Yes,</v>

01:20:40.400 --> 01:20:42.720
<v Speaker 3>that is my God, you are my God.</v>

01:20:42.720 --> 01:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>The thief on the cross would not have heard the apostles' creed</v>

01:20:45.520 --> 01:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>and say this is crap.</v>

01:20:46.320 --> 01:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't believe any of this.</v>

01:20:47.760 --> 01:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>This isn't my God.</v>

01:20:49.760 --> 01:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>That is the difference between us as Christians and Bonhoeffer.</v>

01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:57.600
<v Speaker 3>When Bonhoeffer sees the virgin birth and the resurrection of the dead</v>

01:20:57.760 --> 01:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in hope and salvation, he's like, that's not my God, that's not</v>

01:21:01.520 --> 01:21:02.320
<v Speaker 3>my religion.</v>

01:21:02.320 --> 01:21:04.160
<v Speaker 3>That is his true confession.</v>

01:21:04.160 --> 01:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>So in all these passages, the truth of what he believes will</v>

01:21:08.640 --> 01:21:12.160
<v Speaker 3>creep through in these questions that are merely decides, does it really</v>

01:21:12.160 --> 01:21:16.480
<v Speaker 3>say in the Old Testament the individual salvation it matters?</v>

01:21:16.480 --> 01:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that even in there?</v>

01:21:17.760 --> 01:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's throughout all of it.</v>

01:21:20.560 --> 01:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>And so this is why this stuff is subversive.</v>

01:21:24.080 --> 01:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>That was all that was a long passage.</v>

01:21:26.320 --> 01:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>And he says some things that you can potentially agree with.</v>

01:21:29.680 --> 01:21:33.520
<v Speaker 3>A Christian can come along and baptize some of his words, reincorporating</v>

01:21:33.520 --> 01:21:37.120
<v Speaker 3>them in a way that is actually Christian, just as you could</v>

01:21:37.280 --> 01:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>you could do a Bible study where you did nothing but quote</v>

01:21:39.840 --> 01:21:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Satan from scripture and teach a good Bible study.</v>

01:21:42.880 --> 01:21:46.320
<v Speaker 3>You would have to disagree with what Satan was trying to achieve,</v>

01:21:46.320 --> 01:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>but Satan was quoting God in Scripture.</v>

01:21:49.600 --> 01:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Is as Corey said, like when Satan comes at us, when he</v>

01:21:52.800 --> 01:21:56.720
<v Speaker 3>comes at Christians at believers, he's gonna use God's word to do</v>

01:21:56.720 --> 01:22:00.480
<v Speaker 3>it. Now, sometimes he'll come with other temptations completely outside.</v>

01:22:00.880 --> 01:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>there's something that'll get anyone because we're weak in the flesh and</v>

01:22:04.240 --> 01:22:07.200
<v Speaker 3>we each have our own personal vulnerabilities.</v>

01:22:07.200 --> 01:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a tailor-made path to damnation for every one of us.</v>

01:22:10.880 --> 01:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>And Satan puts all his cards down every day to try to</v>

01:22:13.760 --> 01:22:15.760
<v Speaker 3>get us there.</v>

01:22:15.760 --> 01:22:20.560
<v Speaker 3>God gives us faith, He gives us forgiveness of sins, He promises</v>

01:22:20.560 --> 01:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>us salvation, and all we have to do is not reject it.</v>

01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>And the gift of not rejecting it is itself a gift.</v>

01:22:29.200 --> 01:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>God gives us everything that we need for salvation is never us</v>

01:22:32.880 --> 01:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>doing it.</v>

01:22:33.600 --> 01:22:35.440
<v Speaker 3>And that is our ultimate comfort.</v>

01:22:35.440 --> 01:22:39.280
<v Speaker 3>It's the reason for the Lutheran focus on sacramental theology.</v>

01:22:39.280 --> 01:22:42.080
<v Speaker 3>It's the stuff that we can point to God doing in our</v>

01:22:42.080 --> 01:22:46.080
<v Speaker 3>lives and say, God did this, I trust his promises.</v>

01:22:46.080 --> 01:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>And even the trust in those promises is God giving me something.</v>

01:22:51.440 --> 01:22:55.840
<v Speaker 3>The doubt that's sown by men like Bonhoeffer undermining the tenets of</v>

01:22:55.840 --> 01:22:59.120
<v Speaker 3>the faith, and then saying, oh, but really, there's still there's some</v>

01:22:59.120 --> 01:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of Jesus and there's some sort of incarnation and there's some</v>

01:23:02.240 --> 01:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of last day, and it's going to be great.</v>

01:23:05.520 --> 01:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>If you're not scrupulously dissecting where this stuff is coming from, if</v>

01:23:10.480 --> 01:23:14.480
<v Speaker 3>you're not looking at the genealogy of the ideas, you're gonna potentially</v>

01:23:14.480 --> 01:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>give it a pass.</v>

01:23:15.680 --> 01:23:17.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why Barf is so deadly.</v>

01:23:17.760 --> 01:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Barf and Baltman and Tilich and there's this this string of men</v>

01:23:21.600 --> 01:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>throughout the 20th century that were destroying the Christian faith piece by</v>

01:23:26.080 --> 01:23:30.800
<v Speaker 3>piece and guys love them because it lets midwits sound intelligent as</v>

01:23:30.800 --> 01:23:34.000
<v Speaker 3>they're talking to you and giving you things that are a corruption</v>

01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of the faith and you're like, oh well that's interesting.</v>

01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard that before.</v>

01:23:38.640 --> 01:23:40.720
<v Speaker 3>We want to make sure that when we're talking about this stuff</v>

01:23:40.720 --> 01:23:43.520
<v Speaker 3>on So Inquire, if you've never heard it before, we can just</v>

01:23:43.520 --> 01:23:45.760
<v Speaker 3>point you to scripture like, here it is.</v>

01:23:46.320 --> 01:23:49.280
<v Speaker 3>You know Bon offers, I don't know, is there anything in there</v>

01:23:49.280 --> 01:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>about the individual be having his soul saved?</v>

01:23:52.080 --> 01:23:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Job says yes.</v>

01:23:53.440 --> 01:23:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Many places say yes.</v>

01:23:55.680 --> 01:23:58.720
<v Speaker 3>We don't need to doubt these things because if we trust in</v>

01:23:58.720 --> 01:24:01.760
<v Speaker 3>scripture, we have the answers.</v>

01:24:01.760 --> 01:24:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Again, I pointed at the beginning to the perspicuity of scripture, the</v>

01:24:04.640 --> 01:24:06.640
<v Speaker 3>clarity of scripture episode we did.</v>

01:24:06.640 --> 01:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Specifically, we front loaded that.</v>

01:24:08.720 --> 01:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the first, I think, like five or eight episodes</v>

01:24:10.800 --> 01:24:15.440
<v Speaker 3>we did, in large part, because the attacks that come on the</v>

01:24:15.440 --> 01:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>faith from all these other directions, whether it's making up new sins</v>

01:24:19.520 --> 01:24:24.320
<v Speaker 3>or it's casting doubt on old creeds, they're all predicated on you</v>

01:24:24.320 --> 01:24:27.440
<v Speaker 3>ceasing to believe what God has told us all.</v>

01:24:27.440 --> 01:24:30.800
<v Speaker 3>God hasn't told me anything different than he's telling you.</v>

01:24:30.800 --> 01:24:32.000
<v Speaker 3>It's in Scripture.</v>

01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>And if someone comes along and preaches you a word different than</v>

01:24:34.960 --> 01:24:38.720
<v Speaker 3>that which is given from Scripture, God promises that all the curses</v>

01:24:38.720 --> 01:24:40.880
<v Speaker 3>will be poured out on that man.</v>

01:24:40.880 --> 01:24:43.680
<v Speaker 3>And they're being poured out on Bonhoeffer today.</v>

01:24:43.680 --> 01:24:46.640
<v Speaker 3>And they're going to be poured out on his acolytes, because the</v>

01:24:46.640 --> 01:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>men who hate some of the most important things in the world</v>

01:24:50.240 --> 01:24:52.480
<v Speaker 3>today are men who love Bonhoeffer.</v>

01:24:52.480 --> 01:24:53.680
<v Speaker 3>They love MLK.</v>

01:24:53.680 --> 01:24:57.920
<v Speaker 3>These guys are saints in the New World Religion.</v>

01:24:57.920 --> 01:25:00.960
<v Speaker 3>We're doing this episode as a warning that when you see this</v>

01:25:00.960 --> 01:25:04.400
<v Speaker 3>man being held up, and whatever good things you read, you know,</v>

01:25:04.480 --> 01:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>like I said, there's stuff in here that some of it sounds</v>

01:25:06.800 --> 01:25:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit like us.</v>

01:25:08.560 --> 01:25:13.360
<v Speaker 3>And the reason for is that we're going on opposites directions on</v>

01:25:13.360 --> 01:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the same street, so we're covering some of the same ground, but</v>

01:25:16.560 --> 01:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>he's trying to undo the very things that we're trying to do.</v>

01:25:20.080 --> 01:25:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And so when we cross paths and we sound similar, it's not</v>

01:25:24.080 --> 01:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>shared givens, is that we're operating in the sphere of Christianity.</v>

01:25:28.720 --> 01:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>The difference is that we're trying to uphold it and be faithful</v>

01:25:32.400 --> 01:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>to it, and men like Bonhoeffer and his acolytes today are trying</v>

01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to tear it down.</v>

01:25:37.040 --> 01:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Now there are men who like Bonhoeffer who are Christian.</v>

01:25:39.840 --> 01:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>they're fools.</v>

01:25:40.960 --> 01:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I I use that in the scriptural sense.</v>

01:25:42.800 --> 01:25:45.360
<v Speaker 3>It is foolishness to like this man.</v>

01:25:45.360 --> 01:25:48.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're if you're lapping up the things that this guy is</v>

01:25:48.160 --> 01:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>teaching, you're endangering your soul and the souls of others.</v>

01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Cause as we've laid out just briefly here today, you know, in</v>

01:25:54.960 --> 01:25:58.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty-three, when he was saying stuff about denying the virgin birth and</v>

01:25:58.160 --> 01:26:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the resurrection of the dead, he had not yet despaired.</v>

01:26:01.280 --> 01:26:04.000
<v Speaker 3>He was actually he just had his some sort of conversion experience.</v>

01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:06.640
<v Speaker 3>He would never describe anyone in thirty-one.</v>

01:26:06.640 --> 01:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>And so in this period, he was really into reading the Bible.</v>

01:26:10.080 --> 01:26:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And then by the end in 43, 44, 45, he says in</v>

01:26:13.600 --> 01:26:16.400
<v Speaker 3>some of these other letters, he doesn't read the Bible anymore.</v>

01:26:16.400 --> 01:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>He, whatever faith he had, if if he ever did, by the</v>

01:26:20.800 --> 01:26:24.880
<v Speaker 3>time he started denying the tenets of the faith, the foundations, the</v>

01:26:24.880 --> 01:26:28.800
<v Speaker 3>creeds. Later on he had nothing left but despair.</v>

01:26:28.800 --> 01:26:32.480
<v Speaker 3>And so as he's talking about this religionless world and he's lamenting</v>

01:26:32.560 --> 01:26:34.560
<v Speaker 3>what else do we do, he doesn't realize it.</v>

01:26:34.560 --> 01:26:38.640
<v Speaker 3>It's his very teachings that created the world that he is now</v>

01:26:38.800 --> 01:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>despairing in.</v>

01:26:40.080 --> 01:26:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And his despair was in part of his own creation.</v>

01:26:43.520 --> 01:26:45.520
<v Speaker 3>We don't want that for anyone.</v>

01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:51.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a real thread that runs throughout all of his writings</v>

01:26:52.640 --> 01:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that really comes to a head in some of the later letters</v>

01:26:56.080 --> 01:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>while he was in prison, and that is there is an immense</v>

01:26:59.920 --> 01:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>hypocrisy</v>

01:27:01.760 --> 01:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>underlying so much of what Bonhoeff wrote.</v>

01:27:06.320 --> 01:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Now for some hypocrisy is not going to matter and for others</v>

01:27:09.520 --> 01:27:11.680
<v Speaker 2>it should matter a great deal.</v>

01:27:11.680 --> 01:27:16.640
<v Speaker 2>In politics hypocrisy is one thing.</v>

01:27:16.640 --> 01:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>In religion, in Christianity particularly, hypocrisy is something else entirely.</v>

01:27:21.520 --> 01:27:26.640
<v Speaker 2>You, as a Christian, must not be a hypocrite with regard to</v>

01:27:26.640 --> 01:27:27.520
<v Speaker 2>your faith</v>

01:27:28.720 --> 01:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean that you can't be a Christian and a hypocrite</v>

01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>in the fullest sense of cannot.</v>

01:27:36.480 --> 01:27:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Because of course you are going to say you should not do</v>

01:27:40.720 --> 01:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>X when speaking to someone else, and then later on you may</v>

01:27:43.840 --> 01:27:46.400
<v Speaker 2>very well do that very thing.</v>

01:27:46.400 --> 01:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Does that make you a hypocrite to some degree, of course?</v>

01:27:49.440 --> 01:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Does it make you wrong for saying you should not do X</v>

01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>no? So long as you are repeating a truth about the Christian</v>

01:27:55.520 --> 01:28:01.840
<v Speaker 2>faith. If any man says you should not lust after a woman</v>

01:28:01.840 --> 01:28:05.520
<v Speaker 2>who is not your wife, odds are pretty good that at some</v>

01:28:05.520 --> 01:28:08.080
<v Speaker 2>point in his life he is going to have done that and</v>

01:28:08.080 --> 01:28:09.680
<v Speaker 2>will probably do it again.</v>

01:28:09.680 --> 01:28:14.400
<v Speaker 2>That is just one of the realities of the fallen flesh.</v>

01:28:14.400 --> 01:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>But we see in the writings of Bonhoeffer something Different with regard</v>

01:28:20.720 --> 01:28:23.360
<v Speaker 2>to hypocrisy.</v>

01:28:23.360 --> 01:28:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Because he writes about this deep sense of caring for others that</v>

01:28:28.880 --> 01:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you are supposed to have as a Christian.</v>

01:28:31.680 --> 01:28:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And then in so many of his interactions interactions</v>

01:28:35.040 --> 01:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>he does not show it, and then he becomes a traitor to</v>

01:28:39.040 --> 01:28:40.320
<v Speaker 2>his own people.</v>

01:28:40.320 --> 01:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>He abandons in the process his fiancee, notably, he was set to</v>

01:28:45.920 --> 01:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>be married</v>

01:28:47.280 --> 01:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>shortly after he was arrested.</v>

01:28:50.400 --> 01:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it was I think he was either three months after</v>

01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>he got engaged or three months until the wedding, I don't remember</v>

01:28:56.480 --> 01:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>which one it was.</v>

01:28:59.120 --> 01:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>But this is his fiancee who had just lost her military commander</v>

01:29:04.240 --> 01:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>father and her brother on the Eastern Front.</v>

01:29:06.400 --> 01:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>He mentions that in one of his letters.</v>

01:29:10.960 --> 01:29:16.000
<v Speaker 2>He's just an immense and unsettling hypocrite in so many ways, but</v>

01:29:16.800 --> 01:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>there's also another thread that runs throughout his writings where he is</v>

01:29:20.080 --> 01:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>very clearly seeking to justify himself.</v>

01:29:24.160 --> 01:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And there are places where he speaks explicitly of self justification.</v>

01:29:28.240 --> 01:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>We didn't get to those, and we won't deal with those in</v>

01:29:31.200 --> 01:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>this episode because we don't want to run for four hours dealing</v>

01:29:34.640 --> 01:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>with this man and his bad theology.</v>

01:29:37.600 --> 01:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>But there is one more quote that I want to read that's</v>

01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>related to this issue.</v>

01:29:43.920 --> 01:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>There is clearly no historically significant action that does not trespass ever</v>

01:29:49.040 --> 01:29:52.800
<v Speaker 2>again against the limits set by those laws, he's speaking here of</v>

01:29:52.800 --> 01:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the moral law.</v>

01:29:54.240 --> 01:29:59.360
<v Speaker 2>But it makes a decisive difference whether such trespasses against the established</v>

01:29:59.360 --> 01:30:03.440
<v Speaker 2>limit are viewed as their abolishment in principle and hence And hence</v>

01:30:03.440 --> 01:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>presented as a law of its own kind, or whether one is</v>

01:30:07.200 --> 01:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>conscious that such trespassing is perhaps an unavoidable, guilty, that has its</v>

01:30:13.600 --> 01:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>justification only in that law and limit being reinstated and honored as</v>

01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:19.280
<v Speaker 2>quickly as possible.</v>

01:30:19.280 --> 01:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously there's one word there that was translated a little awkwardly, but</v>

01:30:23.520 --> 01:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the point nevertheless comes through.</v>

01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:31.040
<v Speaker 2>And for those of us with the advantage of hindsight, we can</v>

01:30:31.040 --> 01:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>look at this and see</v>

01:30:33.200 --> 01:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>he's trying to justify what he did, what he was doing, his</v>

01:30:38.800 --> 01:30:44.880
<v Speaker 2>involvement in a plot to assassinate the rightfully elected leader of his</v>

01:30:44.880 --> 01:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>people. Now that is not something that a Christian can do, certainly,</v>

01:30:50.800 --> 01:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but it is</v>

01:30:52.640 --> 01:30:57.200
<v Speaker 2>very certainly, and much more so something in which clergy should not</v>

01:30:57.200 --> 01:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>be involved.</v>

01:30:59.200 --> 01:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>There are limits to what clergy can and cannot do.</v>

01:31:03.440 --> 01:31:06.720
<v Speaker 2>And there are some other quotes of his that are just rank</v>

01:31:07.200 --> 01:31:11.200
<v Speaker 2>clericalism we didn't get to those either, but at one point he</v>

01:31:11.200 --> 01:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>says that scriptures belong to the clergy and not to the congregation,</v>

01:31:15.200 --> 01:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>which is directly opposed to everything written in Reformation theology, particularly by</v>

01:31:21.680 --> 01:31:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Lutherans who focus the priestho focus on the priesthood of all believers</v>

01:31:26.160 --> 01:31:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and very strongly encourage the reading of Scripture.</v>

01:31:29.760 --> 01:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the major points of contention between Protestants and</v>

01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the pre Reformation sects, which is to say both Rome and the</v>

01:31:39.760 --> 01:31:47.360
<v Speaker 2>East. But in this quote and elsewhere he's justifying his wicked transgression</v>

01:31:47.360 --> 01:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of the law by saying, Well, it's fine, as long as it's</v>

01:31:50.960 --> 01:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>transitory. That's not Christian, that's sub Christian in thought.</v>

01:31:56.320 --> 01:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>You do not get to justify yourself, particularly when it comes to</v>

01:32:00.160 --> 01:32:03.680
<v Speaker 2>violating the fifth commandment because that is what he did.</v>

01:32:03.680 --> 01:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>He was engaged in attempted murder.</v>

01:32:07.120 --> 01:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>And people did die as a result, so actually murder, he's guilty</v>

01:32:11.040 --> 01:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of murder.</v>

01:32:12.320 --> 01:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course you're guilty of murder if you attempt murder, but that's</v>

01:32:16.240 --> 01:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>an issue for philosophy and theology for another time.</v>

01:32:22.160 --> 01:32:26.160
<v Speaker 2>The real takeaway from this episode, what we want you to get</v>

01:32:26.160 --> 01:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>out of this is not just that this particular man was a</v>

01:32:31.760 --> 01:32:34.720
<v Speaker 2>wicked man and he has been held up as a martyr in</v>

01:32:34.720 --> 01:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>a new religion.</v>

01:32:35.440 --> 01:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true.</v>

01:32:36.080 --> 01:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>That's an important takeaway.</v>

01:32:37.840 --> 01:32:42.400
<v Speaker 2>But more than that, we want you to understand that you need</v>

01:32:42.400 --> 01:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to be careful when engaging with materials, particularly materials for</v>

01:32:50.160 --> 01:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>men like this, or an unknown quantity.</v>

01:32:54.720 --> 01:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Because it may be that the materials will use terms that sound</v>

01:32:58.320 --> 01:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Christian to you, that sound good, that sound like something that a</v>

01:33:02.160 --> 01:33:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Christian can affirm</v>

01:33:05.200 --> 01:33:09.040
<v Speaker 2>but that may not be the case, because as we have said</v>

01:33:09.040 --> 01:33:13.360
<v Speaker 2>repeatedly, Satan too can quote Scripture.</v>

01:33:13.360 --> 01:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>There is a difference between the Christian knowledge, that is saving knowledge,</v>

01:33:19.680 --> 01:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that we call faith, which is fiducia, in the three levels of</v>

01:33:24.240 --> 01:33:28.240
<v Speaker 2>knowledge. Because the first is you take notice of the thing, you</v>

01:33:28.240 --> 01:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>recognize the thing as a thing, the second is you assent to</v>

01:33:30.720 --> 01:33:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the truth the truth of the thing, and the third is that</v>

01:33:33.600 --> 01:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>you trust in it.</v>

01:33:35.440 --> 01:33:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And it is that trust that we call faith.</v>

01:33:38.400 --> 01:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>That is what saves.</v>

01:33:40.400 --> 01:33:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Satan has notitia and ascensus.</v>

01:33:44.080 --> 01:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Satan knows that Scripture is true.</v>

01:33:47.520 --> 01:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Satan as sense to the fact that Scripture is true.</v>

01:33:50.560 --> 01:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Satan cannot trust in it.</v>

01:33:52.480 --> 01:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Satan has no faith.</v>

01:33:55.200 --> 01:33:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Neither do his acolytes.</v>

01:33:57.520 --> 01:34:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Men like this will sometimes</v>

01:34:01.600 --> 01:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>at least pay lip service to scripture.</v>

01:34:03.760 --> 01:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they'll even assent to the truth of scripture.</v>

01:34:09.040 --> 01:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But then they go off the rails.</v>

01:34:10.480 --> 01:34:12.800
<v Speaker 2>In the case of Bonhoeffer and some of the others, some of</v>

01:34:12.800 --> 01:34:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the more egregious examples, they simply outright deny scripture.</v>

01:34:17.440 --> 01:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>They reject the fundamentals of the Christian faith because he rejected time</v>

01:34:22.640 --> 01:34:25.920
<v Speaker 2>and again, the inspiration of Scripture.</v>

01:34:25.920 --> 01:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>He didn't even go as far as some of the others and</v>

01:34:29.440 --> 01:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>say, well, Scripture contains the Word of God, which you have to</v>

01:34:33.200 --> 01:34:33.920
<v Speaker 2>be careful for that.</v>

01:34:33.920 --> 01:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>If someone says contains the Word of God, that is that is</v>

01:34:37.200 --> 01:34:39.680
<v Speaker 2>meant to deny that it is the word of God.</v>

01:34:39.680 --> 01:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Very different things.</v>

01:34:40.960 --> 01:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The Christian position is that the Scriptures are the Word of God.</v>

01:34:46.640 --> 01:34:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Bonhoeffer just denied that the Scriptures really contain anything.</v>

01:34:51.600 --> 01:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Religion is some other human constructed thing which he compares at one</v>

01:34:55.360 --> 01:35:00.320
<v Speaker 2>point to Buddhism as another potential path to God, another human constructed</v>

01:35:00.320 --> 01:35:01.920
<v Speaker 2>path to God.</v>

01:35:01.920 --> 01:35:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Different, but that But not so fundamentally different that it's not a</v>

01:35:05.360 --> 01:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>path to God.</v>

01:35:09.520 --> 01:35:14.320
<v Speaker 2>you engage with materials, Particularly those that the world is telling you</v>

01:35:14.320 --> 01:35:18.320
<v Speaker 2>are great or important or this person is a giant of the</v>

01:35:18.320 --> 01:35:24.320
<v Speaker 2>church. Engage your critical faculties.</v>

01:35:24.320 --> 01:35:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Compare them to scripture.</v>

01:35:27.040 --> 01:35:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Do these men say the things of God in the same words</v>

01:35:31.520 --> 01:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>as God used, because that's another important matter.</v>

01:35:35.360 --> 01:35:38.320
<v Speaker 2>One thing you will see in these men, just to throw in</v>

01:35:38.320 --> 01:35:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a point here right at the end.</v>

01:35:39.760 --> 01:35:42.640
<v Speaker 2>One thing you will see in these men is that they will</v>

01:35:42.640 --> 01:35:46.000
<v Speaker 2>speak of Christ as an example, the example of Christ.</v>

01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>We have to follow the example of Christ.</v>

01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:52.240
<v Speaker 2>What does Scripture actually say?</v>

01:35:52.400 --> 01:35:54.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a subtle difference, but it matters.</v>

01:35:54.560 --> 01:35:57.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not always a definitive</v>

01:35:59.040 --> 01:36:02.720
<v Speaker 2>conclusion that if the person says example of Christ he is a</v>

01:36:02.720 --> 01:36:06.720
<v Speaker 2>false teacher, but the false teachers tend to use example of Christ</v>

01:36:06.960 --> 01:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>or Christ as example or some wording like that, instead of what</v>

01:36:10.560 --> 01:36:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Paul says become imitators of Christ.</v>

01:36:16.160 --> 01:36:20.400
<v Speaker 2>So someone feels a need to to change the words of Scripture,</v>

01:36:20.400 --> 01:36:22.560
<v Speaker 2>there's probably a reason.</v>

01:36:22.560 --> 01:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So compare what these men say to what God says in his</v>

01:36:26.800 --> 01:36:30.080
<v Speaker 2>word, if they do not match up.</v>

01:36:30.080 --> 01:36:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Get rid of the former.</v>

01:36:33.120 --> 01:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>We spent a fair amount of time slogging through this material, reading</v>

01:36:37.680 --> 01:36:40.880
<v Speaker 2>these books, essays, letters, etc.</v>

01:36:42.400 --> 01:36:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Because we had a very specific purpose in mind, we had a</v>

01:36:45.360 --> 01:36:49.360
<v Speaker 2>reason to do it, we are not recommending that anyone read these</v>

01:36:49.360 --> 01:36:53.120
<v Speaker 2>materials. Life is short.</v>

01:36:53.120 --> 01:36:58.320
<v Speaker 2>If you are going to read theology, read good theology.</v>

01:36:58.320 --> 01:37:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't read these wicked men.</v>

01:37:01.280 --> 01:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>That's not because we're saying, oh well you can't read and understand</v>

01:37:04.880 --> 01:37:06.800
<v Speaker 2>this and no, it's not that.</v>

01:37:06.800 --> 01:37:09.120
<v Speaker 2>It's don't waste your time.</v>

01:37:09.120 --> 01:37:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Read scripture, read good theology.</v>

01:37:11.920 --> 01:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't spend your time reading men who are now in hell.</v>

01:37:18.080 --> 01:37:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Because if you read the materials by those who are now in</v>

01:37:20.640 --> 01:37:26.480
<v Speaker 2>hell, you're not decreasing the odds certainly of joining them.</v>

01:37:26.480 --> 01:37:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Most likely.</v>

01:37:27.680 --> 01:37:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Now again, if you're doing it for a critical reason, perhaps that's</v>

01:37:30.720 --> 01:37:37.440
<v Speaker 2>fine. But these materials are dangerous.</v>

01:37:37.440 --> 01:37:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Wicked writings, evil materials are themselves, in themselves, dangerous.</v>

01:37:43.840 --> 01:37:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Look at what happened in Scripture.</v>

01:37:46.240 --> 01:37:52.000
<v Speaker 2>When those who had previously practiced the dark arts had practiced magic,</v>

01:37:52.320 --> 01:37:59.520
<v Speaker 2>converted to Christianity, they burned their evil materials, worth enormous</v>

01:37:59.520 --> 01:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>sums of money, to day, and certainly, of course, then.</v>

01:38:04.960 --> 01:38:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Because that is the Christian response.</v>

01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes the Christian response is a book burning.</v>

01:38:11.280 --> 01:38:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And I know that doesn't sound very winsome, as it were, to</v>

01:38:15.280 --> 01:38:19.360
<v Speaker 2>modern ears, because we're supposed to believe in some sort of absolute</v>

01:38:19.360 --> 01:38:22.240
<v Speaker 2>freedom of speech in the press, but that is not the Christian</v>

01:38:22.240 --> 01:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>position. Some things are evil in and of themselves, and it is</v>

01:38:26.560 --> 01:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>best for the Christian to avoid</v>

01:38:28.960 --> 01:38:33.920
<v Speaker 2>them. So the best advice we can give you is for men</v>

01:38:33.920 --> 01:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>like Bonhoeffer or Bart or any of a number of others, just</v>

01:38:38.480 --> 01:38:39.440
<v Speaker 2>avoid their writings.</v>

01:38:39.440 --> 01:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>There is no reason to read this material.</v>

01:38:43.920 --> 01:38:45.440
<v Speaker 2>It's good to have</v>

01:38:46.800 --> 01:38:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the sort of cursory information provided in this episode, because now you</v>

01:38:51.200 --> 01:38:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have a response when someone comes up to you, and unfortunately it</v>

01:38:54.560 --> 01:38:58.240
<v Speaker 2>may very well be your pastor, but when someone comes up to</v>

01:38:58.240 --> 01:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you and says, This man was a great Christian, a great theologian,</v>

01:39:03.760 --> 01:39:08.240
<v Speaker 2>he stood up for the church, he opposed those evil Nazis, whatever</v>

01:39:08.240 --> 01:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>it is he says, it'll most likely be something along those lines.</v>

01:39:11.680 --> 01:39:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Now you have some sort of response.</v>

01:39:13.680 --> 01:39:15.440
<v Speaker 2>You can ask some questions.</v>

01:39:15.440 --> 01:39:16.400
<v Speaker 2>You can say</v>

01:39:17.760 --> 01:39:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it good for a Christian to deny the virgin birth?</v>

01:39:21.440 --> 01:39:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Like your pastor or whomever will say no.</v>

01:39:24.160 --> 01:39:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Well Bonhoeffer did it.</v>

01:39:26.160 --> 01:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it good to deny the plenary verbal inspiration of Scripture?</v>

01:39:30.080 --> 01:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Well no.</v>

01:39:30.960 --> 01:39:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Bonhoeffer did.</v>

01:39:33.440 --> 01:39:36.080
<v Speaker 2>A dozen other things.</v>

01:39:36.080 --> 01:39:41.840
<v Speaker 2>The Christian response When other Christians, brothers in error, bring up evil</v>

01:39:41.840 --> 01:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>men like this and say they were greats, is to rebuke them.</v>

01:39:46.160 --> 01:39:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Because if you believe that this man was a great of the</v>

01:39:49.120 --> 01:39:53.680
<v Speaker 2>church, you are endangering your own soul, and you are endangering every</v>

01:39:53.680 --> 01:39:58.880
<v Speaker 2>soul entrusted to your care, and unfortunately today, many of those who</v>

01:39:58.880 --> 01:40:02.880
<v Speaker 2>believe this wicked man was a great man of the church, are</v>

01:40:02.880 --> 01:40:07.120
<v Speaker 2>in charge of many souls, because they are pastors, they are shepherds</v>

01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>of flocks.</v>

01:40:08.400 --> 01:40:10.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's why we did this episode.</v>

01:40:10.960 --> 01:40:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Because Bonhoeffer was an evil man and he is burning in hell.</v>

01:40:15.760 --> 01:40:16.000
I

01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:19.920
<v Speaker 3>want to conclude just briefly by reiterating the quote that I used</v>

01:40:19.920 --> 01:40:24.320
<v Speaker 3>from the very beginning from the LCMS Concordia Seminary in St.</v>

01:40:24.320 --> 01:40:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Louis in two thousand six, because it's probably the most true quote</v>

01:40:29.920 --> 01:40:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that we have read to you today.</v>

01:40:32.720 --> 01:40:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Dietrich Bonhoeffer may well be the most widely admired and respected Christian</v>

01:40:37.360 --> 01:40:41.440
<v Speaker 3>theologian among Christian pastors and theologians in the USA.</v>

01:40:41.440 --> 01:40:46.160
<v Speaker 3>The scope of his appeal is exceptionally broad, spanning across virtually all</v>

01:40:46.160 --> 01:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Christian denominations and across perspectives ranging from the traditional to the liberal.</v>

01:40:53.120 --> 01:40:54.720
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely true.</v>

01:40:54.720 --> 01:40:57.600
<v Speaker 3>And as Corey just said, that is deadly.</v>

01:40:57.600 --> 01:41:00.080
<v Speaker 3>That is the state of our church today.</v>

01:41:00.080 --> 01:41:04.800
<v Speaker 3>A state of free fall apostasy where a man who literally denies</v>

01:41:04.800 --> 01:41:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the creeds as a predicate for all of his other teachings is</v>

01:41:09.760 --> 01:41:13.840
<v Speaker 3>upheld as a great theologian of the 20th century.</v>

01:41:13.840 --> 01:41:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Why? Because he didn't like Nazis.</v>

01:41:16.800 --> 01:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the religion.</v>

01:41:18.640 --> 01:41:23.760
<v Speaker 3>The religion of this age, the New World religion, is one where</v>

01:41:23.920 --> 01:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Nazis bad.</v>

01:41:25.520 --> 01:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry to have to keep bing bringing that crap up because</v>

01:41:28.560 --> 01:41:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it's boring and it's tedious, but it is the religion.</v>

01:41:33.040 --> 01:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Men are damned for being Nazis, not for being sinners.</v>

01:41:37.200 --> 01:41:38.800
<v Speaker 3>That is the sin.</v>

01:41:38.800 --> 01:41:42.800
<v Speaker 3>And so when Concordia Saint Louis says he is a most widely</v>

01:41:42.800 --> 01:41:47.760
<v Speaker 3>admired and respected Christian theologian among so called Christian pastors.</v>

01:41:47.760 --> 01:41:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's probably true.</v>

01:41:49.600 --> 01:41:53.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly the problem that we're hoping we can make some</v>

01:41:53.360 --> 01:41:58.240
<v Speaker 3>small contribution to solving, because Christianity will not survive in an environment</v>

01:41:58.560 --> 01:42:02.880
<v Speaker 3>where men like King and Bonhoeff are seen as Christian martyrs.</v>

01:42:02.880 --> 01:42:06.560
<v Speaker 3>These men were destroyers of souls and they are paying the eternal</v>

01:42:06.560 --> 01:42:07.520
<v Speaker 3>price for it.</v>

01:42:07.520 --> 01:42:10.880
<v Speaker 3>We don't want anyone to join them in the And the surest</v>

01:42:10.880 --> 01:42:13.920
<v Speaker 3>path to joining them is to agree with them, to uphold them,</v>

01:42:13.920 --> 01:42:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to believe what they say, and then to evangelize those beliefs to</v>

01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:20.480
<v Speaker 3>others. That is the world religion.</v>

01:42:20.480 --> 01:42:22.000
<v Speaker 3>It's the popular religion.</v>

01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:24.880
<v Speaker 3>You will fit in if you love Bonhoeffer.</v>

01:42:24.880 --> 01:42:28.000
<v Speaker 3>And the more you talk about him, the more friends you're gonna</v>

01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:33.200
<v Speaker 3>have. Scripture has a lot to say about the popularity of scripture.</v>

01:42:33.200 --> 01:42:38.720
<v Speaker 3>True doctrine is usually not popular, at least not for very long.</v>

01:42:38.720 --> 01:42:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Unpopularity doesn't mean it's right, but popularity certainly doesn't mean it's wrong.</v>

01:42:44.080 --> 01:42:50.480
<v Speaker 3>This man, like King, like Barf, these men were destroyers of the</v>

01:42:50.480 --> 01:42:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Christian faith.</v>

01:42:51.840 --> 01:42:55.920
<v Speaker 3>And today we have so many men in pulpits and in positions</v>

01:42:55.920 --> 01:43:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of authority and power that literally can't tell the difference.</v>

01:43:00.320 --> 01:43:02.880
<v Speaker 3>This is a crisis for the entire church.</v>

01:43:02.880 --> 01:43:05.200
<v Speaker 3>This is a crisis for every Christian.</v>

01:43:05.200 --> 01:43:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Because even if you don't have the aptitude to delve into these</v>

01:43:08.960 --> 01:43:11.920
<v Speaker 3>matters, most of you probably don't, and that's not meant as an</v>

01:43:11.920 --> 01:43:15.520
<v Speaker 3>insult. God God dispenses his gifts unequally.</v>

01:43:15.520 --> 01:43:19.760
<v Speaker 3>There are men who are capable of seeing through these lies.</v>

01:43:19.760 --> 01:43:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Those men should have your support and your protection because they're outnumbered.</v>

01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:29.520
<v Speaker 3>And the men who are seeking to leave the world where there's</v>

01:43:29.520 --> 01:43:34.880
<v Speaker 3>no gospel left, where there's no promise of Job nineteen, where he</v>

01:43:34.880 --> 01:43:37.520
<v Speaker 3>knows that he redeem his Redeemer lives.</v>

01:43:37.520 --> 01:43:40.160
<v Speaker 3>And he knows that he will see him with his own eyes</v>

01:43:40.160 --> 01:43:41.440
<v Speaker 3>on the last day.</v>

01:43:41.440 --> 01:43:42.560
<v Speaker 3>We know that too.</v>

01:43:42.560 --> 01:43:44.320
<v Speaker 3>That is the Christian promise.</v>

01:43:44.320 --> 01:43:47.280
<v Speaker 3>It is not the promise of the faith of these men.</v>

01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Those who deny the resurrection, who deny the true Christ, will meet</v>

01:43:51.520 --> 01:43:55.680
<v Speaker 3>him and the worst possible way, we want for every listener and</v>

01:43:55.680 --> 01:43:58.800
<v Speaker 3>for all of your families and all of your communities to meet</v>

01:43:58.800 --> 01:44:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Christ on the last day, covered in the white robes, washed white</v>

01:44:03.840 --> 01:44:05.760
<v Speaker 3>in the blood of the Lamb.</v>

01:44:05.760 --> 01:44:06.720
<v Speaker 3>The forgiveness of sins</v>

01:44:07.600 --> 01:44:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is the purpose of Scripture.</v>

01:44:09.920 --> 01:44:12.320
<v Speaker 3>It's why it's given to us.</v>

01:44:12.320 --> 01:44:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Everything that we ever do wrong in our lives, everything that Bonhoeffer</v>

01:44:15.440 --> 01:44:18.320
<v Speaker 3>ever did wrong in his life, everything your pastor's ever done wrong</v>

01:44:18.320 --> 01:44:20.560
<v Speaker 3>in his life, getting some of this stuff wrong.</v>

01:44:20.720 --> 01:44:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Jesus paid the price for that.</v>

01:44:23.680 --> 01:44:26.640
<v Speaker 3>When we deny that that price was paid, when we deny that</v>

01:44:26.640 --> 01:44:30.800
<v Speaker 3>these things are sins, that these things are lies, we take it</v>

01:44:30.800 --> 01:44:31.840
<v Speaker 3>back on ourselves.</v>

01:44:31.840 --> 01:44:34.640
<v Speaker 3>And on the last day God will say, Okay, if you say</v>

01:44:34.640 --> 01:44:36.480
<v Speaker 3>that's your sin, I believe you.</v>

01:44:36.480 --> 01:44:40.880
<v Speaker 3>That is not what we wish for anyone, because the eternal punishment</v>

01:44:41.200 --> 01:44:42.880
<v Speaker 3>is infinite.</v>

01:44:42.880 --> 01:44:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Just as the eternal reward is infinite for all the wonderful things</v>

01:44:46.720 --> 01:44:52.320
<v Speaker 3>that God has prepared for us, it's it's literally either or and</v>

01:44:52.320 --> 01:44:54.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not our doing.</v>

01:44:54.080 --> 01:44:58.000
<v Speaker 3>But when we tolerate evil teaching, when we all tolerate evil teachers,</v>

01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:02.000
<v Speaker 3>we ensure that there's no room left in the world for Christian</v>

01:45:02.000 --> 01:45:05.440
<v Speaker 3>teaching. The last thing that we want is to see Christian teaching</v>

01:45:05.440 --> 01:45:06.960
<v Speaker 3>die out.</v>

01:45:06.960 --> 01:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I long for a day when stone Choir is no longer necessary.</v>

01:45:11.280 --> 01:45:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Doing these episodes is unpleasant.</v>

01:45:13.840 --> 01:45:17.040
<v Speaker 3>we put this off for a while because it stinks so much</v>

01:45:17.040 --> 01:45:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to read this crap.</v>

01:45:18.640 --> 01:45:19.840
<v Speaker 3>It's painful.</v>

01:45:19.840 --> 01:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that it's harming people is one of the reasons</v>

01:45:22.800 --> 01:45:23.280
<v Speaker 3>we did.</v>

01:45:23.280 --> 01:45:26.400
<v Speaker 3>We had a lot of requests for this episode.</v>

01:45:26.400 --> 01:45:29.600
<v Speaker 3>If in some small way anything that we do or you do</v>

01:45:29.600 --> 01:45:33.920
<v Speaker 3>can help to turn the tide against these evil teachings, we would</v>

01:45:33.920 --> 01:45:36.800
<v Speaker 3>like to see the entire church get that back to the point</v>

01:45:37.120 --> 01:45:41.680
<v Speaker 3>that our pulpits and our seminaries and wherever men are faithfully raised</v>

01:45:41.680 --> 01:45:45.360
<v Speaker 3>up to spread the word of God, they all see these things</v>

01:45:45.360 --> 01:45:48.720
<v Speaker 3>that are contrary to scripture and say, Yeah, I I'm of a</v>

01:45:48.720 --> 01:45:51.600
<v Speaker 3>different spirit.</v>