WEBVTT

00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:08.960
It

00:02:08.960 --> 00:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is the twenty fifth of September, twenty twenty.</v>

00:02:12.080 --> 00:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I am Cory J.</v>

00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Mahler, and this is at any cost.</v>

00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>This is episode 42, a Q<unk>A episode, and just a little bit</v>

00:02:20.960 --> 00:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of housekeeping before I get started here into the questions.</v>

00:02:26.880 --> 00:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to announce something, but I think I will save</v>

00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that for next week.</v>

00:02:31.120 --> 00:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a little more work to be done on that.</v>

00:02:32.720 --> 00:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>It won't apply to most of you, so don't be too excited</v>

00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for that.</v>

00:02:36.160 --> 00:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>However, applicable to this actual show, I now have a</v>

00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>question board, as it were, for the show for helping me with</v>

00:02:47.200 --> 00:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>streaming. I am ingesting the chat.</v>

00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I then have an AI agent looking at it, extracting questions, and</v>

00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>then presenting them to an iPad that I have here in front</v>

00:02:56.720 --> 00:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of me.</v>

00:02:57.280 --> 00:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So obviously I'm testing that.</v>

00:02:58.880 --> 00:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the first stream using it.</v>

00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So if it misses your question, let me know.</v>

00:03:04.640 --> 00:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't.</v>

00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty correctly configured as far as I've been able to test</v>

00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it, so I don't think it will miss anything.</v>

00:03:11.200 --> 00:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's always a chance that it will.</v>

00:03:13.200 --> 00:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So just to let you all know, if your question does not</v>

00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>get pulled out for</v>

00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>future answers or for answer in this stream, it might be related</v>

00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to that, so let me know so I can fix it for</v>

00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>next stream.</v>

00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, I think that's really the only housekeeping that</v>

00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I have this week, so I will go ahead and get into</v>

00:03:35.440 --> 00:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the questions here.</v>

00:03:39.440 --> 00:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The first couple of questions are a little longer and more involved.</v>

00:03:43.520 --> 00:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's why I put them off last week to this week because</v>

00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to consume a decent chunk of time here, I'm certain.</v>

00:03:50.160 --> 00:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So the first question is is about individualistic objections to national socialism</v>

00:03:57.040 --> 00:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually six different questions, so I will just take them</v>

00:04:01.040 --> 00:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in turn.</v>

00:04:02.320 --> 00:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll just label it as question one with some subparts.</v>

00:04:06.240 --> 00:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully the dogs barking outside my window are not coming through.</v>

00:04:11.280 --> 00:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>They probably aren't.</v>

00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'll read the question here.</v>

00:04:16.320 --> 00:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I and some of the other right wing guys at church have</v>

00:04:19.360 --> 00:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>been trying to talk to one of the guys who is reasonably</v>

00:04:22.400 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on side about government care for the poor under a future national</v>

00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>socialist government in America.</v>

00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>He has a highly individualistic outlook on politics Politics as has and</v>

00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he has various objections.</v>

00:04:36.720 --> 00:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>He his objections in brief are, so I'll just take these in</v>

00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>turn and answer them as I go.</v>

00:04:42.960 --> 00:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Someone said the dogs are coming through a little bit, so you</v>

00:04:45.760 --> 00:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>can go ahead and blame I think that was mostly Gizmo and</v>

00:04:49.280 --> 00:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Callie, my female golden retriever, so you know who to blame for</v>

00:04:52.800 --> 00:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that. But the first question, the first real question here.</v>

00:04:57.280 --> 00:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Socialism of any form isn't in the Bible.</v>

00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The sentiment expressed behind if a man will not work, neither let</v>

00:05:04.400 --> 00:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>him eat, and the very non egalitarian nature of God's created world</v>

00:05:08.960 --> 00:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>world are both arguments against it with natural law sealing the deal</v>

00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for this person who objects and as revealed in socialist experiments.</v>

00:05:20.480 --> 00:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure exactly which experiments he means.</v>

00:05:23.760 --> 00:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>He probably means the USSR, which obviously that's a very different thing,</v>

00:05:27.840 --> 00:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>right? We're not talking about left wing socialism, we're talking about right</v>

00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>wing socialism, which is a different thing.</v>

00:05:34.880 --> 00:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Always remember starting off before I get into the substanti the substantive</v>

00:05:39.360 --> 00:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>answers here, politics is in a spectrum, it's at least a quadrant,</v>

00:05:43.520 --> 00:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>right? You've got authoritarian versus libertarian and left and right.</v>

00:05:47.520 --> 00:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So you certainly have the more socialist aspects both on the right</v>

00:05:53.040 --> 00:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and the left wing, not the same thing, certainly.</v>

00:05:56.400 --> 00:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, National Socialist Germany and Soviet communist Russia are not on</v>

00:06:02.400 --> 00:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the same side.</v>

00:06:04.160 --> 00:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to close my window because the dogs are being quite</v>

00:06:06.640 --> 00:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>loud. That should be good enough.</v>

00:06:12.320 --> 00:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Most of the window is closed.</v>

00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to socialism not being in the Bible, sure,</v>

00:06:19.200 --> 00:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but neither is capitalism, right?</v>

00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a particular political theory system design laid out in</v>

00:06:26.880 --> 00:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>scripture for exactly what we're supposed to do.</v>

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But we do have some pointers, right?</v>

00:06:32.800 --> 00:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>We have some recommendations from God that can steer us in the</v>

00:06:36.560 --> 00:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>right direction.</v>

00:06:37.600 --> 00:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I'll go ahead and pull up one that should certainly</v>

00:06:41.520 --> 00:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>come to mind if someone makes this sort of objection.</v>

00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I will pull up logos here so we can all look</v>

00:06:47.840 --> 00:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at the text.</v>

00:06:52.080 --> 00:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Once I get logos logos to actually display the floating window here.</v>

00:07:01.360 --> 00:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>There we go.</v>

00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'll go to map Matthew for this twenty five starting with</v>

00:07:10.400 --> 00:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>verse thirty one.</v>

00:07:11.600 --> 00:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of you will of course know exactly where I'm going, right?</v>

00:07:14.640 --> 00:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The final judgment.</v>

00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the</v>

00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne.</v>

00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate</v>

00:07:24.800 --> 00:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>people one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the</v>

00:07:28.000 --> 00:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the</v>

00:07:31.280 --> 00:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>goats on the left.</v>

00:07:32.640 --> 00:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Then the king will say to those on his right, Come you</v>

00:07:35.520 --> 00:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you</v>

00:07:39.520 --> 00:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>from the foundation of the world.</v>

00:07:41.280 --> 00:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty,</v>

00:07:44.880 --> 00:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed</v>

00:07:48.320 --> 00:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>me. I was naked and you clothed me.</v>

00:07:50.880 --> 00:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I was sick and you visited me.</v>

00:07:52.720 --> 00:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I was in prison and you came to me.</v>

00:07:55.040 --> 00:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Then the righteous will answer him saying, Lord, when did we see</v>

00:07:58.960 --> 00:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?</v>

00:08:02.320 --> 00:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or</v>

00:08:05.200 --> 00:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>naked and clothe you?</v>

00:08:06.720 --> 00:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit</v>

00:08:09.520 --> 00:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you? And the king will answer them.</v>

00:08:11.440 --> 00:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Truly I say to you, as you did it to one of</v>

00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the least of these, my brothers, you did it to me.</v>

00:08:18.960 --> 00:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think pretty clearly we can see here that we do</v>

00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact have social obligations to those around us, right?</v>

00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And you all know the rest of this passage, so I won't</v>

00:08:28.960 --> 00:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>read that as well.</v>

00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I could also go to the good Samaritan, right?</v>

00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>He's praised very highly for taking care of someone to whom he</v>

00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise didn't have any sort of duty, he didn't have a relationship</v>

00:08:40.800 --> 00:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of, you know, consanguinity attenuated, right?</v>

00:08:44.160 --> 00:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They were distant cousins.</v>

00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>This was someone who was put in his path by God.</v>

00:08:49.600 --> 00:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>He had the opportunity to do good for this man.</v>

00:08:52.800 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is certainly true of our brothers and sisters, our</v>

00:08:57.120 --> 00:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>cousins, in our own nations.</v>

00:08:59.520 --> 00:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a duty to care for them.</v>

00:09:01.280 --> 00:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>We do not have a duty just to care for those in</v>

00:09:03.920 --> 00:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>our own household.</v>

00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>That'll be a later question in this series here.</v>

00:09:07.520 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It is important to care for those closest to us first and</v>

00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>foremost, and so you don't liquidate all of your assets and spend</v>

00:09:14.880 --> 00:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>them on foreigners, right?</v>

00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Or even unspend them on someone across the other side of this</v>

00:09:19.760 --> 00:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>country in which you live, in your own nation.</v>

00:09:22.640 --> 00:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But you do have a duty to care for them.</v>

00:09:25.120 --> 00:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So part of it, of course, is going to be the resources</v>

00:09:27.440 --> 00:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that God has given you, I'll get into that as well.</v>

00:09:29.280 --> 00:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>As well, but there's very clearly a duty in scripture to care</v>

00:09:34.880 --> 00:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for others.</v>

00:09:35.920 --> 00:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The question of course that this person is asking is whether or</v>

00:09:39.280 --> 00:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not that falls to the state.</v>

00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I will get to that as well in one of the later</v>

00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sub questions here because he asks about the church versus the state.</v>

00:09:47.200 --> 00:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But just here at the outset, laying out sort of the framework,</v>

00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we can very clearly see that whether you want to call it</v>

00:09:55.200 --> 00:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>socialism or not, and some people certainly object to the word, and</v>

00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand why, it's been poisoned by the left, but whether or</v>

00:10:01.520 --> 00:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not you call it socialism, there are affirmative social or communitarian if</v>

00:10:06.560 --> 00:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you prefer duties to those in your state, to those who are</v>

00:10:10.160 --> 00:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of your fellow nation of your blood.</v>

00:10:12.880 --> 00:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So it is in the Bible, quite frankly.</v>

00:10:16.320 --> 00:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't say that it isn't.</v>

00:10:17.680 --> 00:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You can say that the formal system that we call socialism, whether</v>

00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right or left, isn't in the scriptures, sure.</v>

00:10:25.280 --> 00:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But again, the only system that's really in scripture is monarchy, and</v>

00:10:29.760 --> 00:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not fully described, right?</v>

00:10:31.680 --> 00:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's partially described.</v>

00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>God does not give us an exact political plan.</v>

00:10:36.800 --> 00:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>This This is a matter of wisdom.</v>

00:10:38.560 --> 00:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It is a matter of looking back through history, seeing what worked,</v>

00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what didn't work, what's moral, what's not, what comports with God's law.</v>

00:10:46.400 --> 00:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But you can see very clearly in scripture, we do in fact</v>

00:10:49.760 --> 00:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have duties, that one might call socialistic or communitarian.</v>

00:10:54.880 --> 00:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And so subquestion two.</v>

00:10:57.280 --> 00:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Envy and discontentment drive us to want what others have.</v>

00:11:02.480 --> 00:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>That's true, but isn't that actually more a critique of capitalism than</v>

00:11:07.760 --> 00:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>socialism? Right?</v>

00:11:08.880 --> 00:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a critique that is certainly leveled against capitalism and In much</v>

00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the academic and other literature, right?</v>

00:11:15.680 --> 00:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>What ultimately drives economic activity under a capitalist system?</v>

00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It's greed.</v>

00:11:22.400 --> 00:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a desire to have more than you currently possess.</v>

00:11:25.520 --> 00:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>That is in fact the engine of capitalism.</v>

00:11:28.640 --> 00:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And so whether it is envy of what someone else has, or</v>

00:11:33.360 --> 00:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if it is looking at it and desiring to have something of</v>

00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>your own, because right it can be a good impulse or a</v>

00:11:38.800 --> 00:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bad one.</v>

00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It depends what you are doing, it depends on your intent.</v>

00:11:42.560 --> 00:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>If you see that your neighbor has a nice house, and you</v>

00:11:45.920 --> 00:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>want his house, right, that's coveting.</v>

00:11:48.560 --> 00:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a sin.</v>

00:11:49.680 --> 00:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>There are commandments on that.</v>

00:11:51.920 --> 00:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>If, however, you look at his nice house and say, I would</v>

00:11:55.040 --> 00:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like to also have a nice house, I want to build my</v>

00:11:57.520 --> 00:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>own house or buy my own nice house, not his, but another</v>

00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one, that's a different thing.</v>

00:12:02.400 --> 00:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You are permitted to do that.</v>

00:12:04.560 --> 00:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So it depends on what the intent there is, what specifically you</v>

00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>want. And discontentment, again, also depends, right?</v>

00:12:14.240 --> 00:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>If it's discontentment, because you're in a legitimately bad scenario, right?</v>

00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're living somewhere the bad winter out of your car, like</v>

00:12:21.920 --> 00:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you're living in your car, say Michigan in the winter, okay, discontentment</v>

00:12:26.560 --> 00:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably reasonable and not a bad thing.</v>

00:12:28.320 --> 00:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You desire to have a better set of circumstances, that can drive</v>

00:12:32.400 --> 00:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you forward.</v>

00:12:33.280 --> 00:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing.</v>

00:12:34.880 --> 00:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>If instead you have discontentment because you just want more to want</v>

00:12:38.800 --> 00:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>more, that again is more of a critique of capitalism.</v>

00:12:42.160 --> 00:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the raw consumerism and just the desire to increase your consumption</v>

00:12:47.440 --> 00:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and your capital is not really a thing in socialism on either</v>

00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the left or the right, but it is very much part of</v>

00:12:56.000 --> 00:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the heart, part of the core of capitalism.</v>

00:12:58.640 --> 00:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So this critique really lands against the system I presume he would</v>

00:13:02.880 --> 00:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>rather defend, not against the system he is attacking.</v>

00:13:07.280 --> 00:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to depend on what exactly you mean by envy</v>

00:13:11.680 --> 00:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and discontentment.</v>

00:13:12.960 --> 00:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're using envy in the proper sense, which envy means you</v>

00:13:16.080 --> 00:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>desire something that rightfully belongs to another, then it's a bad thing.</v>

00:13:20.320 --> 00:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>If instead you're using it in sort of the looser colloquial sense</v>

00:13:24.400 --> 00:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of I would like to also have nice things, that's not bad.</v>

00:13:28.320 --> 00:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It's perfectly reasonable to look at the happy family at church and</v>

00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>want to have your own wife.</v>

00:13:33.920 --> 00:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's sinful to want to have</v>

00:13:35.840 --> 00:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that woman as your wife, right?</v>

00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It depends on the circumstances and what precisely you want.</v>

00:13:44.640 --> 00:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And I would also bring out sort of a generic</v>

00:13:49.920 --> 00:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>response to this because with regard to national socialism, and I just</v>

00:13:55.200 --> 00:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mean right-wing socialism, but that's one we're using specifically here, the desire</v>

00:14:00.640 --> 00:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is not just to accumulate more or to have what someone else</v>

00:14:05.280 --> 00:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>has is what someone else has, right?</v>

00:14:08.400 --> 00:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The desire is to create more and better things for your people.</v>

00:14:14.560 --> 00:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Not just for yourself, not just for your family, but for your</v>

00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>nation. It is love of others, those entrusted to your care, act</v>

00:14:23.520 --> 00:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it out both economically and socially.</v>

00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That is an adequate way to describe, insofar as there is an</v>

00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>inherent economic system, the economic system of right wing socialism.</v>

00:14:34.560 --> 00:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not driven by this naked avarice, this desire to acquire more.</v>

00:14:39.440 --> 00:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Rather, it's driven by the desire to do what is good for</v>

00:14:42.560 --> 00:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>your people, and that is going to of course mean work and</v>

00:14:46.080 --> 00:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>economic activity, creating those better circumstances for your own.</v>

00:14:51.680 --> 00:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, sub question three.</v>

00:14:54.720 --> 00:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>This interlocutor says I will fight anything that involves forcibly taking money</v>

00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>away from my children or grandchildren to enrich someone else, which is</v>

00:15:04.400 --> 00:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what wealth redistribution already does to me.</v>

00:15:07.520 --> 00:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I understand part of this critique, right?</v>

00:15:09.520 --> 00:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we all do, because we all live under current governments</v>

00:15:13.520 --> 00:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that are wicked and quite frankly, the current level of taxation is</v>

00:15:17.360 --> 00:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>confiscatory, right?</v>

00:15:18.560 --> 00:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It is wicked.</v>

00:15:19.760 --> 00:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not a good thing.</v>

00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>That being said, the critique does not generalize.</v>

00:15:25.840 --> 00:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>The critique is against a wicked implementation of a given system.</v>

00:15:31.360 --> 00:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And you can say the current system does it, right?</v>

00:15:34.160 --> 00:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Well the current system is capitalism doing the same thing to you.</v>

00:15:37.520 --> 00:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So the critique is not against socialism per se as a system.</v>

00:15:42.320 --> 00:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It is against the particulars of the implementation, right?</v>

00:15:45.680 --> 00:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to defend a right-wing socialist system that taxes you</v>

00:15:49.840 --> 00:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at sixty percent.</v>

00:15:51.760 --> 00:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it should be a ten percent flat sales tax and</v>

00:15:54.800 --> 00:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>no other taxes, except maybe on large chunks of commercial property.</v>

00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>There should be a homestead exemption.</v>

00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into all the tax policies of a</v>

00:16:04.160 --> 00:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical future government right now, that's not the point.</v>

00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But whether it is a right wing socialist system, a left wing</v>

00:16:12.560 --> 00:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>socialist system, a capitalist system, whatever it happens to be, if the</v>

00:16:16.640 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>taxation rises to the level where it is confiscatory, it's sinful regardless</v>

00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of the system, right?</v>

00:16:24.160 --> 00:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what the political system is because we're discussing something</v>

00:16:28.080 --> 00:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that is related but in a tangential way.</v>

00:16:31.280 --> 00:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Because any of these systems can set taxes too high.</v>

00:16:34.880 --> 00:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That being said, it is important again to look at scripture, which</v>

00:16:38.880 --> 00:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I still have open, so I'll just pull it up.</v>

00:16:40.880 --> 00:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Right? Of course we're going to Romans this time.</v>

00:16:44.880 --> 00:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Pay to all what is owed to them, taxes to whom taxes</v>

00:16:49.040 --> 00:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect</v>

00:16:53.200 --> 00:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.</v>

00:16:56.080 --> 00:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And remember this is in the context of the Roman Empire, right?</v>

00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>They had taxes.</v>

00:17:00.880 --> 00:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You paid your taxes, you are supposed to do that.</v>

00:17:04.400 --> 00:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Saying that taxes are per se wicked, right?</v>

00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>The lovely phrase the libertarians just really enjoy shouting at people online,</v>

00:17:14.560 --> 00:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>taxation is theft.</v>

00:17:16.080 --> 00:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>That's anti Christian.</v>

00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You cannot be a Christian and firmly believe and follow that ideology</v>

00:17:22.480 --> 00:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because it is directly contrary to Scripture.</v>

00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Scripture says pay taxes to whom taxes are owed.</v>

00:17:28.320 --> 00:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You are to pay your taxes.</v>

00:17:30.240 --> 00:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, again, can you object to the type and level of taxation</v>

00:17:34.880 --> 00:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in your country?</v>

00:17:36.080 --> 00:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course you can.</v>

00:17:37.360 --> 00:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Particularly when it's like ours, that is wicked, right?</v>

00:17:40.640 --> 00:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We pay ridiculous taxes.</v>

00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I used to live in Southern California.</v>

00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm well aware of how ridiculous taxes can be.</v>

00:17:48.560 --> 00:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Not that I've found Tennessee is necessarily great when it comes to</v>

00:17:51.280 --> 00:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>certain things when with taxation, but as a general rule, we have</v>

00:17:56.160 --> 00:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>too much taxation in the United States and the tax rates are</v>

00:17:59.520 --> 00:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>too high.</v>

00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You still have to pay your taxes, but it is perfectly reasonable</v>

00:18:04.160 --> 00:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to agitate, to work together politically, to knock those tax rates down</v>

00:18:09.280 --> 00:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and to remove some of the unnecessary ones.</v>

00:18:11.120 --> 00:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with doing that.</v>

00:18:13.520 --> 00:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But this particular subquestion gets very close in my mind to the</v>

00:18:19.360 --> 00:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>libertarian argument, and the whole thing smells of libertarianism to me, which</v>

00:18:23.120 --> 00:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into that, my sort of closing remarks for this section,</v>

00:18:25.920 --> 00:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but this particular subquestion looks like a libertarian objection cloaked in different</v>

00:18:31.760 --> 00:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>language, right?</v>

00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Wealth redistribution it depends what you mean.</v>

00:18:37.760 --> 00:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you mean taxation that then drives some social programs?</v>

00:18:42.320 --> 00:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you call that wealth redistribution, I'm going to disagree with</v>

00:18:45.200 --> 00:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you, because that is one of the duties of the state, and</v>

00:18:48.800 --> 00:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I will get into that a little bit more.</v>

00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If instead you're talking about confiscatory taxation, say the government enacts an</v>

00:18:55.520 --> 00:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent tax rate, right?</v>

00:18:57.600 --> 00:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And just takes a ton of your money, right?</v>

00:19:00.080 --> 00:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And then just gives it to people who do nothing but sit</v>

00:19:02.880 --> 00:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>around all day.</v>

00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a fundamentally different thing.</v>

00:19:06.400 --> 00:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Taking care of those who have had misfortune, whether it's illness or</v>

00:19:11.120 --> 00:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>misadventure, whatever it happens to be To be is fundamentally different from</v>

00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing the lifestyle of those who refuse to work.</v>

00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>National socialism does not subsidize the lifestyle of those who refuse to</v>

00:19:24.240 --> 00:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>work. Right-wing socialism would say you can work or you can go</v>

00:19:28.560 --> 00:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in a work camp.</v>

00:19:30.080 --> 00:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We are not going to give you free money.</v>

00:19:32.560 --> 00:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to work because scripture is very clear, right?</v>

00:19:35.440 --> 00:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>He who does not work, let him not eat.</v>

00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Perfectly consonant with the system if it is structured correctly.</v>

00:19:43.760 --> 00:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Question 4.</v>

00:19:45.120 --> 00:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>If I have to steal a dollar from a richer man to</v>

00:19:47.520 --> 00:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>feed my wife and children, then perhaps I am not ready for</v>

00:19:50.720 --> 00:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a wife and children.</v>

00:19:55.040 --> 00:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>This one can really only be addressed in a particular set of</v>

00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>circumstances, and so I'll address it in the set of circumstances in</v>

00:20:02.080 --> 00:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which we find ourselves.</v>

00:20:03.600 --> 00:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe also in the hypothetical future one, right?</v>

00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Under Under the present government, the present system, if you do everything</v>

00:20:13.040 --> 00:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>right as a Christian, right, you marry your wife young because you</v>

00:20:17.440 --> 00:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>should to avoid temptation, scripture's abundantly clear on that.</v>

00:20:21.440 --> 00:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You do all the stuff you're supposed to do and not the</v>

00:20:23.920 --> 00:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff you're not supposed to do.</v>

00:20:25.520 --> 00:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You're going to wind up with some number of children north of</v>

00:20:29.120 --> 00:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>four. Most likely.</v>

00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It may be twelve.</v>

00:20:31.360 --> 00:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It may be a lot of children.</v>

00:20:33.520 --> 00:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Because of the way our current economic system is structured, most men</v>

00:20:37.760 --> 00:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can't support that.</v>

00:20:39.520 --> 00:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that a critique of the men who are doing the things</v>

00:20:42.240 --> 00:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>God told you to do?</v>

00:20:43.520 --> 00:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>The men who are being faithful to God's word and his design</v>

00:20:46.880 --> 00:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for humanity?</v>

00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Or is it a critique of the economic system that has made</v>

00:20:50.720 --> 00:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it impossible for men to be both righteous and</v>

00:20:55.120 --> 00:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>financially sound?</v>

00:20:56.720 --> 00:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I take it as a critique of the system, because of, for</v>

00:21:00.480 --> 00:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>instance, permitting women to work outside the house, which creates artificial competition,</v>

00:21:05.360 --> 00:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the wealth transfers to which this man rightly objects, because</v>

00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of confiscatory taxation and on and on and on.</v>

00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We all know the reasons it's very difficult to sustain an actual</v>

00:21:17.040 --> 00:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>family, a proper family, under present circumstances.</v>

00:21:21.120 --> 00:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't take that as a critique of a hypothetical national</v>

00:21:25.440 --> 00:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>socialist government.</v>

00:21:26.560 --> 00:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I take that as a critique of the system producing that outcome</v>

00:21:30.320 --> 00:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>today. Now, under a national socialist, under a right-wing socialist government, you</v>

00:21:37.040 --> 00:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>would change these rules.</v>

00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't have women working outside the house, and so you don't</v>

00:21:41.520 --> 00:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have this artificial competition between the sexes, which means men draw higher</v>

00:21:45.840 --> 00:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>salaries. You don't permit essentially what is slave labor for your own</v>

00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>people, right?</v>

00:21:52.960 --> 00:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying slavery is per se wicked, but I'm saying paying</v>

00:21:56.720 --> 00:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>slave wages to your own flesh and blood is a wicked thing</v>

00:22:01.120 --> 00:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to do.</v>

00:22:02.240 --> 00:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So we should not have jobs that pay below the poverty level,</v>

00:22:06.800 --> 00:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>which exists today.</v>

00:22:08.160 --> 00:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>We all know the numbers if you draw the comparisons between the</v>

00:22:11.840 --> 00:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>value of gold, say back in the 1950s versus today, and then</v>

00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>compare the minimum wage or even the median wage, right?</v>

00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>That should not be permissible.</v>

00:22:21.920 --> 00:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You should not be allowing these large employers to exploit their employees.</v>

00:22:27.760 --> 00:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And that of course has turned into a left wing talking point,</v>

00:22:30.720 --> 00:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>right? They're the ones who have sort of captured that.</v>

00:22:32.800 --> 00:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It should be one of our talking points.</v>

00:22:34.800 --> 00:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Care for the worker and care for the average man is 100%</v>

00:22:38.800 --> 00:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>something that is consonant with right wing politics and certainly with Christianity.</v>

00:22:43.280 --> 00:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You should not exploit your own people.</v>

00:22:45.840 --> 00:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you design the system correctly, this is not a problem.</v>

00:22:51.200 --> 00:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Right? If the man is working full time, he should be able</v>

00:22:55.120 --> 00:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to support a family.</v>

00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That should be a right wing talking point.</v>

00:22:58.960 --> 00:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>We should not let the left have that.</v>

00:23:01.120 --> 00:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>If there is a man who is working full time and unable</v>

00:23:04.480 --> 00:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to support a family, then that job should not exist at that</v>

00:23:08.080 --> 00:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>level, because it is a wicked thing to treat your fellow man,</v>

00:23:11.600 --> 00:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your fellow flesh and blood, your kinsmen, in that way.</v>

00:23:17.840 --> 00:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Sub Question five.</v>

00:23:20.160 --> 00:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>According to the New Testament, the church must also care for its</v>

00:23:23.120 --> 00:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>widows and orphans.</v>

00:23:24.400 --> 00:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think if you are outside the church you should have no</v>

00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>recourse. Beyond your physical family, the church should be the only social</v>

00:23:30.560 --> 00:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>safety net.</v>

00:23:31.600 --> 00:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>No church, you get a hard landing.</v>

00:23:33.600 --> 00:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Again, this just sounds like libertarianism to me, and I will put</v>

00:23:37.200 --> 00:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>up my article about libertarianism in the show notes for this one,</v>

00:23:41.440 --> 00:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>which against the cry of Cain, because this is Cain, right?</v>

00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Cain saying to God, Am I my brother's keeper?</v>

00:23:48.080 --> 00:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, the answer is yes.</v>

00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You are your brother's keeper.</v>

00:23:51.120 --> 00:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And so if you find yourself siding with Cain, I encourage you</v>

00:23:55.600 --> 00:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>very strongly to reconsider some things.</v>

00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Cain was not a Christian.</v>

00:24:00.000 --> 00:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Cain was the first anti-Christian.</v>

00:24:02.400 --> 00:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Cain was the first murderer.</v>

00:24:04.640 --> 00:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So you probably don't want to side with that man.</v>

00:24:09.440 --> 00:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is where I wanted to comment on the difference between</v>

00:24:13.760 --> 00:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the church and the state, right?</v>

00:24:15.120 --> 00:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Does the church have a duty to care for widows and orphans?</v>

00:24:19.040 --> 00:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Does the state also have a duty to do so?</v>

00:24:22.640 --> 00:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Again, absolutely yes.</v>

00:24:24.800 --> 00:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And we can see some of this even in Old Testament Israel,</v>

00:24:28.960 --> 00:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>right? Many of the sacrifices which were a form of welfare for</v>

00:24:34.000 --> 00:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the nation were provided by the king.</v>

00:24:36.800 --> 00:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Where'd the king get his money?</v>

00:24:38.720 --> 00:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Taxation. So you already see that sort of system in the very</v>

00:24:43.520 --> 00:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of government instituted by God in the Old Testament.</v>

00:24:47.920 --> 00:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So you can't object that it's not in scripture, even in even</v>

00:24:51.600 --> 00:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>if that is a solid objection, which is isn't always so, because</v>

00:24:55.520 --> 00:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it is there.</v>

00:24:56.560 --> 00:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>You see the state having a duty to care for the poor,</v>

00:25:00.400 --> 00:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>not just the church.</v>

00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a division there, which is a wisdom call, and it's</v>

00:25:05.520 --> 00:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>partly going to come down to essentially how competent the state is,</v>

00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>right? Because if the state is sufficiently competent to organize these things</v>

00:25:13.840 --> 00:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in an effective way that doesn't waste money, that does what is</v>

00:25:17.120 --> 00:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>good for the people, then the church is going to have less</v>

00:25:20.320 --> 00:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of a burden.</v>

00:25:21.280 --> 00:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing if the church has less of a burden,</v>

00:25:23.520 --> 00:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because then the church can focus more on the core things the</v>

00:25:27.120 --> 00:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>church is supposed to do.</v>

00:25:28.560 --> 00:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Think about what they did in scripture, right?</v>

00:25:31.360 --> 00:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>For distributing food and things like that.</v>

00:25:33.760 --> 00:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>They had to call additional men because it was actually distracting from</v>

00:25:37.520 --> 00:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and detracting from the core mission of the church.</v>

00:25:40.640 --> 00:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So having the state do it instead is actually a good thing</v>

00:25:44.080 --> 00:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>where the state is competent.</v>

00:25:46.080 --> 00:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>This again is an objection to the current form of the state</v>

00:25:49.200 --> 00:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have.</v>

00:25:49.760 --> 00:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>We live under wicked governments.</v>

00:25:51.200 --> 00:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>No one is going to contend no Christian is going to contend</v>

00:25:53.920 --> 00:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>otherwise. We all know that.</v>

00:25:55.760 --> 00:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that is not a critique against government, it is a critique against</v>

00:25:59.600 --> 00:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>wicked government, right?</v>

00:26:01.360 --> 00:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Just like saying if you have a wife, right, and she commits</v>

00:26:05.760 --> 00:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>adultery, is that a critique against your wife or all women?</v>

00:26:09.600 --> 00:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a critique against your wife, against the whip the wicked woman,</v>

00:26:13.280 --> 00:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the one who committed the sin.</v>

00:26:14.880 --> 00:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with regard to government.</v>

00:26:16.640 --> 00:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't critique all government because you find an example that does</v>

00:26:20.080 --> 00:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>something wicked.</v>

00:26:22.160 --> 00:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not inherent to government, right?</v>

00:26:24.000 --> 00:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously if we're talking about something that's inherent, that's a different thing.</v>

00:26:30.480 --> 00:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So sub question six, and then I guess I'll have some just</v>

00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of general concluding remarks on it.</v>

00:26:37.440 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I would never deny providing for members of my same household, but</v>

00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>yes, I do not lift a finger to help random members of</v>

00:26:44.800 --> 00:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>my race race that I do not know, and nor should I</v>

00:26:48.320 --> 00:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Ordo Amoris.</v>

00:26:50.080 --> 00:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is kind of correct but mostly wrong, right?</v>

00:26:54.320 --> 00:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Ordo Amoris, obviously, is the order of loves, rightly ordered loves.</v>

00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you have a a core that is your household and</v>

00:27:02.400 --> 00:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you have the greatest duty to them, right?</v>

00:27:04.160 --> 00:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Those under your own roof.</v>

00:27:06.400 --> 00:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But you also have duties going out from that, that's the whole</v>

00:27:09.680 --> 00:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>point of the Ordo Amoris.</v>

00:27:12.320 --> 00:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You have the duty to your immediate family, then you have the</v>

00:27:15.440 --> 00:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>duty to your extended family, then to your even more extended family,</v>

00:27:18.800 --> 00:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>your cousins, and well your nation is an even more extended family.</v>

00:27:22.560 --> 00:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So you have duties to them as well.</v>

00:27:24.480 --> 00:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I want to point out, the level of</v>

00:27:27.360 --> 00:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your duty is partly dependent upon what God has entrusted to your</v>

00:27:31.920 --> 00:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>care. So if you have only enough resources to care for your</v>

00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>own family, care for your own family.</v>

00:27:39.760 --> 00:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>If you have enough resources to help provide meals to those who</v>

00:27:44.320 --> 00:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have fallen on hard times, do that.</v>

00:27:46.960 --> 00:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>If you have the expertise and the free time to help your</v>

00:27:50.560 --> 00:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>neighbor repair his house.</v>

00:27:52.320 --> 00:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Do that.</v>

00:27:53.520 --> 00:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>We went over this extensively in Stone Choir.</v>

00:27:56.400 --> 00:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>The things entrusted to your care, which includes not just the monetary,</v>

00:28:00.720 --> 00:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's certainly part of it, but also your skills, your free</v>

00:28:03.840 --> 00:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>time, things like that.</v>

00:28:05.520 --> 00:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Your garden could overproduce one year, you can give away tomatoes, whatever</v>

00:28:09.040 --> 00:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be.</v>

00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>According to that level of resources, you should give to your fellow</v>

00:28:14.720 --> 00:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>man. Scripture's abundantly clear on that, right?</v>

00:28:17.840 --> 00:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Those who have been given great wealth are commanded in Scripture to</v>

00:28:22.160 --> 00:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>serve the church and to serve their neighbors with that great wealth,</v>

00:28:25.680 --> 00:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and they will be judged for that.</v>

00:28:27.440 --> 00:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The same with regard to anything that has been entrusted to your</v>

00:28:30.320 --> 00:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>care. This is the parable of the talents, right?</v>

00:28:32.560 --> 00:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>The talents are not just money.</v>

00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It is all of the abilities, the skills, everything God has given</v>

00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you, because everything you have is a gift from God, and it</v>

00:28:40.960 --> 00:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is a gift from God that is supposed to be used in</v>

00:28:43.840 --> 00:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>service of family and neighbor and nation.</v>

00:28:47.680 --> 00:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Because ultimately your nation is an extension of the family and an</v>

00:28:50.800 --> 00:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>extension of neighbor.</v>

00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So yes, orders applies, but it doesn't terminate at your front door.</v>

00:28:57.680 --> 00:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It depends on how much God is entrusted to your care.</v>

00:29:04.560 --> 00:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave the concluding remarks from the questioner.</v>

00:29:07.200 --> 00:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>If anyone wants to read those, you can go ahead and do</v>

00:29:09.200 --> 00:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that. But I wanted to generally comment on this, that two points</v>

00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that I pulled out that are worth emphasizing.</v>

00:29:16.800 --> 00:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Almost all of this critique is libertarian, which is anti-Christian.</v>

00:29:21.760 --> 00:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to bluntly state that.</v>

00:29:23.600 --> 00:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't be a libertarian or Christian.</v>

00:29:26.000 --> 00:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>They're incompatible.</v>

00:29:27.200 --> 00:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Period. You cannot defend that.</v>

00:29:29.280 --> 00:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>You cannot argue against that.</v>

00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to select which one you want to be.</v>

00:29:32.560 --> 00:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be a libertarian, that's your God.</v>

00:29:34.320 --> 00:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Ayn Rand is your God.</v>

00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish you the best luck at the judgment, but I think</v>

00:29:38.080 --> 00:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we both know how that will go.</v>

00:29:39.680 --> 00:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Or you can choose to have Jesus Christ as your Lord and</v>

00:29:42.800 --> 00:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Savior. Choose wisely.</v>

00:29:45.600 --> 00:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The other part of this, in addition to the the general sort</v>

00:29:49.440 --> 00:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of libertarian critique, is that this is ultimately a critique of the</v>

00:29:52.800 --> 00:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>current system that is being used as a critique of a hypothetical</v>

00:29:58.000 --> 00:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>right wing socialist system, right?</v>

00:30:00.800 --> 00:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>All of this lands as a critique against our current government.</v>

00:30:05.120 --> 00:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily land as a critique against the future hypothetical government.</v>

00:30:09.360 --> 00:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you have built up a straw man that is essentially</v>

00:30:13.760 --> 00:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the USSR, you've just sort of put a stick it uh sticky</v>

00:30:18.160 --> 00:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>note over it and said, No, this is right wing socialism.</v>

00:30:21.040 --> 00:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sure, you can level this sort of accusation, this sort of</v>

00:30:24.320 --> 00:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>critique against it, but you're not attacking the real thing.</v>

00:30:28.320 --> 00:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this is a man to sort of address the question</v>

00:30:31.520 --> 00:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>practically and directly.</v>

00:30:33.280 --> 00:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is a man who would benefit from actually looking at</v>

00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the economic writings of the National Socialists.</v>

00:30:39.120 --> 00:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of those.</v>

00:30:40.160 --> 00:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>You can in fact find the books from their actual economists laying</v>

00:30:43.760 --> 00:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>out what they believed, why they believed it, how they intended to</v>

00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>implement things in the future, how they were implementing things.</v>

00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You can look at their success rate over a relatively short period</v>

00:30:54.400 --> 00:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, miraculous success, you can look at what they actually did.</v>

00:30:58.640 --> 00:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So if he has critiques of what they actually did, what they</v>

00:31:02.640 --> 00:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>actually believed, then sure, address the actual critiques, but these critiques land</v>

00:31:07.440 --> 00:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>more against again our current economic system and government and really communism,</v>

00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>left wing socialism, not right wing.</v>

00:31:17.840 --> 00:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that addressed most of his objections thoroughly so you can get</v>

00:31:23.120 --> 00:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere with him in future discussions.</v>

00:31:26.080 --> 00:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Question two.</v>

00:31:28.160 --> 00:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to look at the chat real quickly here.</v>

00:31:30.960 --> 00:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it is pulling all the questions well, so I think</v>

00:31:34.000 --> 00:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we're good.</v>

00:31:34.720 --> 00:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Question two is again a series of questions about baptism this time.</v>

00:31:39.600 --> 00:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I will go ahead and go through those now.</v>

00:31:43.520 --> 00:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Sub question one.</v>

00:31:46.320 --> 00:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll read the intro first actually.</v>

00:31:48.240 --> 00:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>My wife and I are former Jehovah's Witnesses.</v>

00:31:50.480 --> 00:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We understand our Jehovah's Witness baptism was invalid and meaningless, non Trinitarian,</v>

00:31:55.680 --> 00:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>submitted to under false instruction and basically a pledge to the organization.</v>

00:31:59.200 --> 00:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>That is correct.</v>

00:32:00.160 --> 00:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the Lutheran stance, that's the traditional Christian stance.</v>

00:32:03.360 --> 00:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with Mormons.</v>

00:32:04.960 --> 00:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So just two big groups of the supplies.</v>

00:32:07.760 --> 00:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Not the only groups, but two examples.</v>

00:32:09.840 --> 00:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We are now facing questions about getting baptized properly.</v>

00:32:13.600 --> 00:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So sub question one.</v>

00:32:15.920 --> 00:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The non-denominational church we've been attending will only admit members baptized as</v>

00:32:21.120 --> 00:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>believers. This presents no issue for me.</v>

00:32:24.480 --> 00:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>However, my wife was baptized in the Catholic Church as an infant,</v>

00:32:28.160 --> 00:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and we are concerned that re baptizing her would offend God.</v>

00:32:31.680 --> 00:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Would it be wrong for her to get baptized to formerly join</v>

00:32:35.040 --> 00:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the church we're attending could other circumstances make her Catholic baptism invalid?</v>

00:32:40.880 --> 00:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>For example, she recalls taking communion on some occasions to the child,</v>

00:32:44.800 --> 00:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but she recalls neither finishing catechism nor the ceremony that follows it.</v>

00:32:49.040 --> 00:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>That's confirmation, just so you know.</v>

00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>She was taken into the foster care system at age ten, and</v>

00:32:54.880 --> 00:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the godparents involved in her baptism did not remain in her life</v>

00:32:57.920 --> 00:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to spiritually shepherd her, as they ostensibly promised.</v>

00:33:02.640 --> 00:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That's unfortunate on the godparents' note, certainly, but perhaps not surprising given</v>

00:33:07.920 --> 00:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances.</v>

00:33:09.600 --> 00:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>To answer the core question, do not seek so called rebaptism.</v>

00:33:14.480 --> 00:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It is not a thing.</v>

00:33:15.680 --> 00:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Her baptism as an infant in the Roman Catholic Church is valid.</v>

00:33:19.600 --> 00:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic baptisms, as of today, at any rate, are valid.</v>

00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps in the future they go off the rails fully, right?</v>

00:33:26.480 --> 00:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, if they start baptizing people in the name of Mary, then</v>

00:33:29.520 --> 00:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>y no, it's not a valid baptism.</v>

00:33:31.600 --> 00:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But as long as they are following the scriptural formula, right?</v>

00:33:34.880 --> 00:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Trinitarian, you're baptizing in the name of the actual God, you follow</v>

00:33:39.680 --> 00:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the wording in scripture, there's water involved, right?</v>

00:33:43.440 --> 00:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a valid baptism.</v>

00:33:45.120 --> 00:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is that it is God's work, not</v>

00:33:48.720 --> 00:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>man's work, right?</v>

00:33:50.080 --> 00:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>If we start thinking that it is man's work, then that's just</v>

00:33:54.400 --> 00:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>an ancient heresy, right?</v>

00:33:55.760 --> 00:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That's Donatism.</v>

00:33:57.360 --> 00:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Donatism is essentially the belief that the holiness or the righteousness of</v>

00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the individual performing the sacrament is relevant to the power of the</v>

00:34:08.080 --> 00:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sacrament. And it's simply not.</v>

00:34:11.120 --> 00:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Because it is God who is doing the work.</v>

00:34:13.680 --> 00:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>He is using the hands of the minister, right, to baptize in</v>

00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the case of the infant or to distribute the elements in the</v>

00:34:19.360 --> 00:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>case of the sacrament of the table, also called communion.</v>

00:34:23.200 --> 00:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But God is the one doing the work.</v>

00:34:24.960 --> 00:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So it relies on God's power and God's promise, not on the</v>

00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:32.720
<v Speaker 1>minister, or in the case of baptism, any Christian can baptize, right?</v>

00:34:32.800 --> 00:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't have to be a minister.</v>

00:34:34.800 --> 00:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Ordinarily and properly, it is in fact in fact your pastor, or</v>

00:34:39.680 --> 00:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>your priest, depending on what you call him.</v>

00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But it could be your father.</v>

00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Even women are permitted to baptize, certainly in an emergency.</v>

00:34:46.960 --> 00:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just not the ordinary course of things, it's not sort of</v>

00:34:50.160 --> 00:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right decorum, it's not the proper way to do it, but it's</v>

00:34:53.040 --> 00:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>still valid, because it is God's work, not man's work.</v>

00:34:57.440 --> 00:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer, of course, is what I already said.</v>

00:35:00.480 --> 00:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>No. Do not submit to rebaptism.</v>

00:35:03.440 --> 00:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It is a wicked thing.</v>

00:35:04.960 --> 00:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>No one should do that.</v>

00:35:06.320 --> 00:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It should not be tolerated.</v>

00:35:08.880 --> 00:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, her baptism is valid.</v>

00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>She does not have to worry about that.</v>

00:35:12.880 --> 00:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, if they start baptizing in the name of</v>

00:35:16.000 --> 00:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Mary or something, okay, we can revisit the discussion and point out</v>

00:35:19.440 --> 00:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that yes, you now need to be baptized because that was invalid.</v>

00:35:22.400 --> 00:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But they're not doing that.</v>

00:35:23.760 --> 00:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>They are using the ancient formulas, they are doing it correctly, it's</v>

00:35:27.200 --> 00:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a valid baptism.</v>

00:35:29.200 --> 00:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Subquestion two.</v>

00:35:31.120 --> 00:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We have been attending a non-denominational church for about 1.5 years that</v>

00:35:35.280 --> 00:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is basically MacArthurite Thankfully they are not pushy about doctrine and have</v>

00:35:39.760 --> 00:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>yet to even discuss Israel.</v>

00:35:41.680 --> 00:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Theologically we are attracted to Lutheranism or Anglicanism, but have yet to</v>

00:35:47.280 --> 00:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>find one locally that isn't sorely lacking.</v>

00:35:50.160 --> 00:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We visited one Wells and one Nalk, NALC, which were extremely small</v>

00:35:55.680 --> 00:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and literally dying.</v>

00:35:58.080 --> 00:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not particularly surprising.</v>

00:36:00.480 --> 00:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Majority white, but elderly, few or no children, and the Nalk is</v>

00:36:06.080 --> 00:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>more feminized.</v>

00:36:07.120 --> 00:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They ordain women, despite having a male pastor, in this case.</v>

00:36:11.520 --> 00:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Our non denominational church is almost mega sized, very conservative, vast majority</v>

00:36:17.200 --> 00:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>white, which is extremely rare where we live, and absolutely teeming with</v>

00:36:21.760 --> 00:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>conservative young families and children of all ages.</v>

00:36:24.880 --> 00:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We are raising two boys under four and are incredibly lucky just</v>

00:36:28.080 --> 00:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to find a place in our state only ten minutes away with</v>

00:36:31.200 --> 00:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so many young white families, which feels essential for how we want</v>

00:36:34.960 --> 00:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to raise our children.</v>

00:36:36.160 --> 00:36:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Setting aside my wife's baptism, their baptism application basically expects me to</v>

00:36:41.760 --> 00:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>profess belief in writing in so called believers baptism.</v>

00:36:46.080 --> 00:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Would it be wrong for me to carefully word or equivocate in</v>

00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>my answer, so they don't just outright reject me or drag me</v>

00:36:52.880 --> 00:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>into a debate, then reject me?</v>

00:36:55.040 --> 00:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Would passing their quiz in this way harm my baptism, or would</v>

00:36:59.200 --> 00:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>baptism in this church by itself be less valid due to their</v>

00:37:02.320 --> 00:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>professed beliefs?</v>

00:37:04.240 --> 00:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:37:05.840 --> 00:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the MacArthurites typically describe themselves as what is called leaky dispensationalism, which</v>

00:37:11.760 --> 00:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't really a thing, but it's how he described himself, so that's</v>

00:37:14.480 --> 00:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>how they describe themselves.</v>

00:37:17.120 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes they're all in on the Israel stuff, Israel in quotes.</v>

00:37:22.480 --> 00:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes they're not.</v>

00:37:23.600 --> 00:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>This church appear appears to be one of the ones that's kinda</v>

00:37:26.240 --> 00:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>not. So</v>

00:37:28.320 --> 00:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell if they will go off the rails in the</v>

00:37:30.560 --> 00:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>future. Often megachurches that are non-denominational are kind of cults of personality</v>

00:37:36.480 --> 00:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the head pastor kind of decides everything.</v>

00:37:39.040 --> 00:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>He determines the direction, the doctrine, the emphasis, all of it.</v>

00:37:42.400 --> 00:37:43.760
<v Speaker 1>That's very often the case.</v>

00:37:43.760 --> 00:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's the elders instead.</v>

00:37:46.080 --> 00:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Puppeting the head pastor, but usually it's the head pastor.</v>

00:37:48.960 --> 00:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which one it is in your case, you probably</v>

00:37:51.120 --> 00:37:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good sense.</v>

00:37:52.720 --> 00:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the head pastor.</v>

00:37:55.440 --> 00:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So the question would your baptism be valid?</v>

00:37:58.160 --> 00:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes, your baptism would still be valid because again,</v>

00:38:01.360 --> 00:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>same as the first sub-question, it's God's work, not yours.</v>

00:38:04.880 --> 00:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So what the pastor believes would be relevant only if he were</v>

00:38:09.520 --> 00:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>something like non-trinitarian, because then he would be a Unitarian baptism, which</v>

00:38:13.520 --> 00:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is not a thing, lowercase B, but if it is a proper</v>

00:38:17.760 --> 00:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>baptism, Trinitarian, according to how Scripture says you have to do it,</v>

00:38:23.200 --> 00:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right? It's valid.</v>

00:38:25.280 --> 00:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Even if the church doesn't hold perfect doctrine, thankfully the standard is</v>

00:38:28.560 --> 00:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not perfect doctrine, or basically no baptism would be valid because no</v>

00:38:32.880 --> 00:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>church is perfect.</v>

00:38:34.640 --> 00:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So, except for of course the uppercase C church, which is all</v>

00:38:37.840 --> 00:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>believers, that one's perfect because God is the one who's in charge</v>

00:38:40.640 --> 00:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, right?</v>

00:38:41.280 --> 00:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ is the head.</v>

00:38:43.280 --> 00:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, should you carefully word or equivocate in your answer so that</v>

00:38:49.360 --> 00:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you can be baptized?</v>

00:38:51.040 --> 00:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give two answers.</v>

00:38:53.600 --> 00:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>One is I would be a little uncomfortable going that route, but</v>

00:38:57.600 --> 00:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the second one is if you can get away with it really</v>

00:39:00.960 --> 00:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>easily, then maybe just for the sake of peace and helping your</v>

00:39:06.160 --> 00:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>family, it might be worth it, right?</v>

00:39:08.960 --> 00:39:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't think that what you're doing is necessarily rising the</v>

00:39:12.800 --> 00:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>level of a false confession.</v>

00:39:14.720 --> 00:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Because if you say that I do believe and I would like</v>

00:39:17.840 --> 00:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to be baptized, and as a believer I want to be baptized,</v>

00:39:21.280 --> 00:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if they wish to interpret that as a believer's baptism, then they</v>

00:39:24.400 --> 00:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are in fact baptizing a believer, but you don't believe in what</v>

00:39:28.160 --> 00:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they're calling believers baptism If they're specifically calling you to profess belief</v>

00:39:32.800 --> 00:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in believers' baptism, then I would say no.</v>

00:39:36.000 --> 00:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>In that case, go to the Wells Church or the LCMS Church</v>

00:39:41.040 --> 00:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or something and get baptized there.</v>

00:39:44.640 --> 00:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:39:46.000 --> 00:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Nalk because they do ordain women.</v>

00:39:50.800 --> 00:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So that will probably eventually become an issue for you because they'll</v>

00:39:53.840 --> 00:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>rotate out your pastor and rotate on a woman or something like</v>

00:39:56.880 --> 00:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that. And then you'll have the chaos in your life of having</v>

00:40:00.560 --> 00:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to abandon that church and flee somewhere else because what they're doing</v>

00:40:04.560 --> 00:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is wicked.</v>

00:40:05.280 --> 00:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And just being associated with it is not great.</v>

00:40:07.360 --> 00:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>The same reason I wouldn't tell someone to go to Elka, right?</v>

00:40:10.320 --> 00:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ElkhA has more problems than Nalk, but it has that particular salient</v>

00:40:15.280 --> 00:40:18.720
<v Speaker 1>one, and as I've said many times before, there's no such thing</v>

00:40:18.720 --> 00:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>as a female pastor or a pastrix.</v>

00:40:21.120 --> 00:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a whore.</v>

00:40:22.000 --> 00:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what she is.</v>

00:40:23.200 --> 00:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>She is a false prophetess.</v>

00:40:25.600 --> 00:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So you don't want to be there.</v>

00:40:28.880 --> 00:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to depend sort of on the exact circumstances there</v>

00:40:32.640 --> 00:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and what exactly it is they are getting you to confess.</v>

00:40:35.360 --> 00:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>If they're really pushing hard on the believer's baptism thing, I would</v>

00:40:38.800 --> 00:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>say don't do that because what you're doing is you're giving a</v>

00:40:41.040 --> 00:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>false confession.</v>

00:40:41.680 --> 00:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're saying you believe something that you don't believe, and you're denying</v>

00:40:45.360 --> 00:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>belief in something you do believe.</v>

00:40:47.760 --> 00:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are a couple more questions here, and I won't get</v>

00:40:50.160 --> 00:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into necessarily the rest of what I could say here because they're</v>

00:40:53.520 --> 00:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more relevant in the next subquestions.</v>

00:40:56.080 --> 00:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Subquestion three.</v>

00:40:57.680 --> 00:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>This church obviously uses grape juice and holds the memorial view of</v>

00:41:01.360 --> 00:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>communion, which is Which is disheartening.</v>

00:41:03.680 --> 00:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That's all non denominational churches in the US.</v>

00:41:06.400 --> 00:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I am now tempted by the following prospect formally join the very</v>

00:41:10.480 --> 00:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>near Nalk Church and just endure the objectional the objectional stuff objectionable</v>

00:41:15.760 --> 00:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff. Or join the wells that is thirty minutes away, a burden</v>

00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday at eight AM with a toddler and a newborn.</v>

00:41:22.880 --> 00:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I can certainly understand that not having them myself, but I can</v>

00:41:26.160 --> 00:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>understand. So that my family can be part of church with real</v>

00:41:29.760 --> 00:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>baptism and communion, while continuing to regularly attend the non denominational church</v>

00:41:35.200 --> 00:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for these social aspects so my sons can actually have friends and</v>

00:41:38.240 --> 00:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one day find white wives.</v>

00:41:40.160 --> 00:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Would this be wrong?</v>

00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There is also an LCMS, also thirty minutes away, which we have</v>

00:41:44.640 --> 00:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>yet to visit.</v>

00:41:46.800 --> 00:41:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think here the course of action I would probably recommend,</v>

00:41:50.320 --> 00:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and it thinks I think it's the most likely given what you've</v>

00:41:52.960 --> 00:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>told me and what I just generally know about these sorts of</v>

00:41:56.080 --> 00:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>churches. Go talk to the pastor at the Wells Church or the</v>

00:42:00.320 --> 00:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>LCMS church.</v>

00:42:01.680 --> 00:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell him the situation in which you find yourself, your concerns, all</v>

00:42:05.600 --> 00:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>those things.</v>

00:42:06.560 --> 00:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He'll probably be sympathetic.</v>

00:42:08.400 --> 00:42:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He should be sympathetic.</v>

00:42:10.240 --> 00:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So if that is the case, then you know you can attend</v>

00:42:15.120 --> 00:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that church, say, one weekend out of the month, or you know,</v>

00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>once every six weeks, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:42:23.120 --> 00:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you want that relationship with the denomination, with the church that</v>

00:42:28.560 --> 00:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has the doctrine that you hold to be true, right?</v>

00:42:31.520 --> 00:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You want that, but he should recognize that there is a burden</v>

00:42:35.680 --> 00:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there. It is a difficult thing to attend a church that's so</v>

00:42:39.120 --> 00:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>far away.</v>

00:42:39.600 --> 00:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not something you should have to do.</v>

00:42:41.040 --> 00:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just the reality of the circumstances under which we live.</v>

00:42:45.200 --> 00:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And then get baptized there, get the sound doctrine, get the instruction</v>

00:42:49.920 --> 00:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there, right?</v>

00:42:50.560 --> 00:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You can instruct you should be instructing your children and your wife</v>

00:42:53.760 --> 00:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at home, regardless of whether you're attending a sound church or not,</v>

00:42:57.280 --> 00:43:00.320
<v Speaker 1>right? That's your duty as a husband and as a father.</v>

00:43:00.320 --> 00:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So go through the small catechism, go through the large catechism, do</v>

00:43:04.000 --> 00:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>all those things.</v>

00:43:05.920 --> 00:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And then also attend the other church, right?</v>

00:43:08.880 --> 00:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that's impermissible.</v>

00:43:11.280 --> 00:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You are going to have to be careful with how you instruct</v>

00:43:14.240 --> 00:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your children, and you're going to at some point, when they are</v>

00:43:16.880 --> 00:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>old enough to understand, have to explain to them why you're doing</v>

00:43:20.800 --> 00:43:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this, right?</v>

00:43:21.760 --> 00:43:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They'll understand.</v>

00:43:22.800 --> 00:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>They'll be happy, right?</v>

00:43:24.000 --> 00:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>They're have more friends.</v>

00:43:25.920 --> 00:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>When they're interested in girls, there will be girls around and available.</v>

00:43:29.360 --> 00:43:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And so they'll understand why you're doing it, but you will have</v>

00:43:32.240 --> 00:43:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to explain that to them, and it's going to put a little</v>

00:43:34.320 --> 00:43:37.760
<v Speaker 1>additional burden on you to make sure that they are taught right</v>

00:43:37.760 --> 00:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>doctrine when they may very well be hearing doctrine that is not</v>

00:43:40.960 --> 00:43:44.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly correct at one of their churches.</v>

00:43:44.240 --> 00:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But practically speaking, I think that's probably your best path forward because</v>

00:43:50.080 --> 00:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets you</v>

00:43:51.680 --> 00:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in a church that has the right doctrine, but also involved</v>

00:43:56.000 --> 00:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in a church that is a reasonable distance from your home and</v>

00:43:59.680 --> 00:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>actually has you know, membership.</v>

00:44:02.720 --> 00:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Which is unfortunate that there are a lack of solid churches like</v>

00:44:07.120 --> 00:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that, but it is where we are today.</v>

00:44:09.600 --> 00:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>There are some new Lutheran churches being started up in a number</v>

00:44:13.600 --> 00:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of places.</v>

00:44:14.080 --> 00:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I visited some of them.</v>

00:44:15.200 --> 00:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They're doing very good work, but they're not everywhere yet.</v>

00:44:18.640 --> 00:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So unless you live in a handful of specific places around the</v>

00:44:21.360 --> 00:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>country, there's no church I can just unequivocally recommend to you.</v>

00:44:25.520 --> 00:44:28.240
<v Speaker 1>If you happen to live closer to an LCMS church, I would</v>

00:44:28.240 --> 00:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>say join that with the usual caveats I've given before, right, it</v>

00:44:32.160 --> 00:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>depends on the pastor, check out the congregation, talk to the elders.</v>

00:44:35.680 --> 00:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But generally speaking, it's a pretty good option for most people in</v>

00:44:38.880 --> 00:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places.</v>

00:44:40.480 --> 00:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Here I think probably that split approach is best.</v>

00:44:43.840 --> 00:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So, sub question four.</v>

00:44:46.800 --> 00:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>While I would love to be a Lutheran in a Lutheran church</v>

00:44:49.280 --> 00:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>full of young white families, this may not exist near me, and</v>

00:44:53.120 --> 00:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it could even be difficult to find in some new place we</v>

00:44:56.320 --> 00:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or my children once adults move to in the future.</v>

00:44:59.360 --> 00:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That is true.</v>

00:45:00.480 --> 00:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Thus it is conceivable that whatever we choose to do now my</v>

00:45:03.920 --> 00:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sons could one day face the same dilemma my wife and I</v>

00:45:06.480 --> 00:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>now face, given the potential for future for limited options in the</v>

00:45:11.120 --> 00:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>future, would it be wrong for me to hold my sons back</v>

00:45:14.080 --> 00:45:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from baptism until they reach such an age that any future church</v>

00:45:17.760 --> 00:45:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they join would recognize their believers' baptism in quotes, not my quotes,</v>

00:45:22.320 --> 00:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>his quotes.</v>

00:45:23.040 --> 00:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I would do that too, though, and have no cause to demand</v>

00:45:26.160 --> 00:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>re baptism, thus sparing my sons this silly yet extremely weighty dilemma.</v>

00:45:32.400 --> 00:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>This one sounds difficult, but it's easy.</v>

00:45:34.480 --> 00:45:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Baptize your children.</v>

00:45:35.760 --> 00:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You believe that is a commandment from God, you believe baptism applies</v>

00:45:39.680 --> 00:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to even infants, that is correct.</v>

00:45:41.760 --> 00:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You should bap you should have them baptized.</v>

00:45:44.080 --> 00:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. And by the way, you can actually baptize your children at</v>

00:45:48.560 --> 00:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>home if you need to.</v>

00:45:49.840 --> 00:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in this case, the join the LCMS or the Wells</v>

00:45:53.120 --> 00:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Church and have them baptize there is probably the better route.</v>

00:45:56.240 --> 00:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But if it comes down to it, and for whatever reason that</v>

00:46:00.480 --> 00:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>route does not work out, you can baptize your children at home.</v>

00:46:03.760 --> 00:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You are permitted to baptize your own children.</v>

00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure you have the standard witnesses, godparents, things like that.</v>

00:46:10.480 --> 00:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are a good thing to have because a future church doing</v>

00:46:14.080 --> 00:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>its due dil diligence will ask them, When were you baptized?</v>

00:46:18.800 --> 00:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you have proof it actually happened?</v>

00:46:21.280 --> 00:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It used to be this was just the church records, right?</v>

00:46:24.080 --> 00:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Your local town church had records of every baptism, marriage, death, all</v>

00:46:28.960 --> 00:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>those things.</v>

00:46:30.400 --> 00:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Now we have to maintain some of our own records because it's</v>

00:46:34.160 --> 00:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just the system we live under.</v>

00:46:35.840 --> 00:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Partly because we have so many different denominations, churches come and go,</v>

00:46:38.800 --> 00:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>some close down, they don't keep the records.</v>

00:46:41.040 --> 00:46:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a mess.</v>

00:46:42.240 --> 00:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you keep that stuff for yourself.</v>

00:46:44.640 --> 00:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It is appropriate for a future church to ask when were you</v>

00:46:48.560 --> 00:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>baptized? Who baptized you?</v>

00:46:51.280 --> 00:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>What is their affiliation, right?</v>

00:46:52.960 --> 00:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Because it could be that you thought you were baptized, but it</v>

00:46:55.360 --> 00:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was the Mormons or something, which is invalid.</v>

00:46:58.880 --> 00:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But yes, baptize your children, and if they have to go through</v>

00:47:02.320 --> 00:47:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this same thing, then that is unfortunate, but it is the reality.</v>

00:47:05.760 --> 00:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully, we have better churches in place, including in your era your</v>

00:47:09.600 --> 00:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>area, by the time your children are old enough to run into</v>

00:47:13.040 --> 00:47:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this issue.</v>

00:47:14.240 --> 00:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Or if absolutely necessary, you find other like minded men in the</v>

00:47:20.000 --> 00:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>larger congregation and start your own church, even if it's a home</v>

00:47:24.080 --> 00:47:28.240
<v Speaker 1>church. That is certainly a permissible option, and it's something people should</v>

00:47:28.240 --> 00:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be considering going forward.</v>

00:47:33.440 --> 00:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Question three.</v>

00:47:36.400 --> 00:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Expecting nothing in return.</v>

00:47:38.480 --> 00:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>A question about Luke Six.</v>

00:47:40.320 --> 00:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>What are some ways I can be wise about loaning money or</v>

00:47:44.880 --> 00:47:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to those who ask for there's a missing noun there to those</v>

00:47:48.720 --> 00:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>who ask for it and not be taken for everything?</v>

00:47:52.160 --> 00:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I understanding Jesus correctly that I should not seek to seek</v>

00:47:55.440 --> 00:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to get back exactly what I gave out.</v>

00:47:58.960 --> 00:48:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a verse that is abused by the left and by</v>

00:48:03.760 --> 00:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>others, and they try to push we're back to socialism.</v>

00:48:07.200 --> 00:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They try to push their version of socialism with it, right?</v>

00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They try to say that, oh, Jesus commanded you to sell all</v>

00:48:13.440 --> 00:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>your property and give everything away.</v>

00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>That command was specifically for that man because Jesus looked into his</v>

00:48:18.560 --> 00:48:21.760
<v Speaker 1>heart and saw that his possessions were his idol Not all men</v>

00:48:21.760 --> 00:48:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have that command, obviously.</v>

00:48:24.240 --> 00:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Even the apostles did not sell everything and give it away, right?</v>

00:48:27.920 --> 00:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>They still had a fishing business.</v>

00:48:29.840 --> 00:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>They didn't liquidate that and give it all away.</v>

00:48:32.080 --> 00:48:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Christ didn't command them to do that.</v>

00:48:35.040 --> 00:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>An example people probably generally miss when they're reading through scripture, but</v>

00:48:38.320 --> 00:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's right there on the page.</v>

00:48:40.160 --> 00:48:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So do you have to give away everything?</v>

00:48:43.280 --> 00:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to loan money to absolutely everyone who asks you</v>

00:48:46.880 --> 00:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for a dollar?</v>

00:48:47.680 --> 00:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>No. The answer to that is obviously no.</v>

00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, we're back to the Order Amoris.</v>

00:48:51.920 --> 00:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You have a duty to your family, you have a duty to</v>

00:48:55.760 --> 00:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>those who are closest to you, and what happens if you just</v>

00:48:58.640 --> 00:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>give away everything?</v>

00:49:00.080 --> 00:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, you can't fulfil your duties now, right?</v>

00:49:03.120 --> 00:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>If you can't fulfil your duties, what you've done is obviously at</v>

00:49:06.240 --> 00:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the very least unwise, and probably wicked.</v>

00:49:09.520 --> 00:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So when you do lend, right, if you're lending money, that's a</v>

00:49:14.080 --> 00:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>wisdom call as to whether or not you have the ability to</v>

00:49:17.200 --> 00:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>do that.</v>

00:49:17.920 --> 00:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If it will cause undue hardship for your family, don't do that</v>

00:49:22.080 --> 00:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because you have a duty that is higher to your family because</v>

00:49:24.560 --> 00:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they're closer to you.</v>

00:49:25.920 --> 00:49:27.280
<v Speaker 1>God entrusted them to your care.</v>

00:49:28.400 --> 00:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you have the ability to lend that money, you have</v>

00:49:32.160 --> 00:49:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the ability to help others, then yes, lend to your family members</v>

00:49:36.320 --> 00:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and your friends and expect nothing in return.</v>

00:49:39.040 --> 00:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>If they are able to repay, great.</v>

00:49:40.960 --> 00:49:42.720
<v Speaker 1>If they're not, forgive the debt.</v>

00:49:42.720 --> 00:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>That is the Christian approach.</v>

00:49:45.680 --> 00:49:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to pretend that's an easy thing to do,</v>

00:49:48.320 --> 00:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>right? That's we're sort of hardwired by our economic system and just</v>

00:49:52.640 --> 00:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>general human jealousy, greed, things like jealousy in the negative sense in</v>

00:49:56.960 --> 00:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this case.</v>

00:49:57.680 --> 00:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We're sort of hardwired to not want to do that.</v>

00:50:00.480 --> 00:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But some of the sayings of Christ are difficult.</v>

00:50:02.960 --> 00:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality of it though.</v>

00:50:04.560 --> 00:50:07.760
<v Speaker 1>If you lend to a family member, you lend to a friend</v>

00:50:08.240 --> 00:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>If he cannot repay you, forgive the debt, right?</v>

00:50:11.120 --> 00:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You can think of the unworthy servant, right?</v>

00:50:14.160 --> 00:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Forgiven the great debt, refuse to forgive a small debt.</v>

00:50:17.120 --> 00:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to be that man.</v>

00:50:24.000 --> 00:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I should probably mention, because I would be somewhat</v>

00:50:27.840 --> 00:50:31.360
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I did not, but Christ was certainly speaking to a</v>

00:50:31.360 --> 00:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>crowd for whom it would have only been a possibility to lend</v>

00:50:35.760 --> 00:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to family and neighbors, right?</v>

00:50:38.320 --> 00:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There was no online micro lending to people 5,000 miles away, effectively</v>

00:50:44.720 --> 00:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in the unknown parts of the world, right?</v>

00:50:46.640 --> 00:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You did not have the option living in Judea or even living</v>

00:50:50.160 --> 00:50:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in Rome to lend to someone living in Uganda or Russia or</v>

00:50:55.520 --> 00:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, wherever it happens to be.</v>

00:50:57.680 --> 00:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So bear that in mind.</v>

00:50:59.440 --> 00:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't think that you have an obligation to lend to random people</v>

00:51:03.120 --> 00:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the third world.</v>

00:51:04.160 --> 00:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't.</v>

00:51:04.720 --> 00:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact it's wicked to do so because you're taking that money</v>

00:51:07.920 --> 00:51:11.280
<v Speaker 1>away from your children and giving it to strangers.</v>

00:51:11.280 --> 00:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>That is right, telescopic philanthropy, that is a wicked thing.</v>

00:51:15.840 --> 00:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You are neglecting your own to feel good about doing something that</v>

00:51:18.880 --> 00:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is in fact evil.</v>

00:51:20.000 --> 00:51:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So don't do that.</v>

00:51:27.120 --> 00:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Question four.</v>

00:51:30.400 --> 00:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Proper and improper actions for deaconesses in the church What can deaconesses</v>

00:51:36.800 --> 00:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do or not do in the church?</v>

00:51:38.400 --> 00:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>What are their duties and responsibilities?</v>

00:51:40.640 --> 00:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>By deaconess I mean a regular woman who serves the church, not</v>

00:51:44.080 --> 00:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the deaconesses who are just females pretending to be pastors.</v>

00:51:47.120 --> 00:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that's good, because as I mentioned earlier, those are not properly</v>

00:51:51.120 --> 00:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>called pastors or pastrixes or whatever you want to call them, they're</v>

00:51:54.640 --> 00:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>something else entirely.</v>

00:51:56.560 --> 00:52:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But the word deaconess just means servant, female servant.</v>

00:52:00.400 --> 00:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what she is.</v>

00:52:02.160 --> 00:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>She can clean the sanctuary.</v>

00:52:04.480 --> 00:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>She can help the pastor shelve books.</v>

00:52:07.520 --> 00:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>She can serve food at the brunch.</v>

00:52:09.920 --> 00:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>She can do any of those things.</v>

00:52:11.680 --> 00:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>She's not a teacher.</v>

00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>She's not a pretend pastor.</v>

00:52:15.040 --> 00:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>She's nothing else like that.</v>

00:52:16.720 --> 00:52:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So should we even have them?</v>

00:52:18.320 --> 00:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think no.</v>

00:52:19.120 --> 00:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it misleads women, it gives them the wrong impression.</v>

00:52:22.560 --> 00:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's making an office that shouldn't exist for women.</v>

00:52:26.000 --> 00:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Think what the deacons in scripture did.</v>

00:52:28.640 --> 00:52:30.880
<v Speaker 1>They were waiting tables.</v>

00:52:31.120 --> 00:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Much of the time.</v>

00:52:32.160 --> 00:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Not always.</v>

00:52:32.640 --> 00:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>They did some other stuff too, but that's one of the things</v>

00:52:34.560 --> 00:52:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they did.</v>

00:52:35.280 --> 00:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So the deaconess is certainly not a higher office than that.</v>

00:52:38.880 --> 00:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should have them.</v>

00:52:40.080 --> 00:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I think it is a negative thing.</v>

00:52:42.000 --> 00:52:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it leads to a lot of problems in the church.</v>

00:52:44.400 --> 00:52:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Women do not need to have offices in the church.</v>

00:52:46.640 --> 00:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have women working in the church in any shape whatsoever.</v>

00:52:50.160 --> 00:52:52.240
<v Speaker 1>No office manager, secretary, none of that.</v>

00:52:52.240 --> 00:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It should be men working in the church.</v>

00:52:54.560 --> 00:52:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And men need to step up and do those jobs.</v>

00:52:57.280 --> 00:52:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason that you wind up with a lot of</v>

00:52:58.800 --> 00:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>women is because men have neglected to do the things they should</v>

00:53:02.160 --> 00:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>be doing.</v>

00:53:03.120 --> 00:53:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say there aren't women trying to usurp power they</v>

00:53:06.320 --> 00:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>should not have.</v>

00:53:07.040 --> 00:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>That is certainly a massive problem all over the place.</v>

00:53:11.120 --> 00:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But part of it is invited by men not doing the things</v>

00:53:14.480 --> 00:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>men need to be doing.</v>

00:53:15.920 --> 00:53:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer is we should have no deaconesses whatsoever.</v>

00:53:19.760 --> 00:53:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But the slightly expanded answer is if they want to serve the</v>

00:53:24.240 --> 00:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>church, then that's them from doing that, but don't give him a</v>

00:53:29.040 --> 00:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>title. Question five.</v>

00:53:34.160 --> 00:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Related to an earlier question.</v>

00:53:37.440 --> 00:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain why libertarianism is wrong?</v>

00:53:40.240 --> 00:53:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Especially the slogan I don't care what you do as long as</v>

00:53:43.280 --> 00:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hurt slash bother me.</v>

00:53:46.560 --> 00:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And so definitely see my article that I will be linking to</v>

00:53:52.080 --> 00:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the show notes on that earlier question.</v>

00:53:53.920 --> 00:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll link it here as well, just to make it easier</v>

00:53:55.760 --> 00:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for people to find.</v>

00:53:57.120 --> 00:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:54:01.360 --> 00:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The beginning of the answer is that yes, I'm my brother's keeper,</v>

00:54:04.480 --> 00:54:08.240
<v Speaker 1>right? That's the answer to Kane's question, you know, am I my</v>

00:54:08.240 --> 00:54:09.840
<v Speaker 1>brother's keeper is yes.</v>

00:54:09.840 --> 00:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you are.</v>

00:54:10.640 --> 00:54:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You have duties to your brother.</v>

00:54:12.720 --> 00:54:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But to answer specifically what you bring up here, right?</v>

00:54:17.760 --> 00:54:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You are part of a society.</v>

00:54:19.840 --> 00:54:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You live with other people in society.</v>

00:54:22.720 --> 00:54:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The things you do affect others.</v>

00:54:25.760 --> 00:54:28.800
<v Speaker 1>The things others do affect you.</v>

00:54:28.800 --> 00:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We can take a sort of extreme example, right?</v>

00:54:31.920 --> 00:54:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:54:33.280 --> 00:54:38.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say someone opens up a meth house across the street from</v>

00:54:38.240 --> 00:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>your house.</v>

00:54:39.360 --> 00:54:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's his house, it's his life, it's his friends destroying their</v>

00:54:44.800 --> 00:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>lives. What business is it of yours what he does with his</v>

00:54:48.000 --> 00:54:51.120
<v Speaker 1>body, his time, and his property?</v>

00:54:51.040 --> 00:54:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we can all see that it's pretty clearly your</v>

00:54:54.080 --> 00:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>business as well, right?</v>

00:54:55.360 --> 00:54:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Because you probably don't want to live across from a meth house,</v>

00:54:58.320 --> 00:54:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a meth den.</v>

00:54:59.440 --> 00:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably don't want your children to do so.</v>

00:55:01.680 --> 00:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You probably don't want one of those to exist, period, anywhere in</v>

00:55:05.360 --> 00:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>society. And yes, there's also the concern of you should actually care</v>

00:55:10.080 --> 00:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens to your neighbor.</v>

00:55:12.080 --> 00:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Cause that man is your neighbor.</v>

00:55:13.360 --> 00:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You should care about his health and his welfare.</v>

00:55:15.920 --> 00:55:19.280
<v Speaker 1>You should want the state to intervene and not just shut down</v>

00:55:19.280 --> 00:55:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the evil thing he's doing, but to get him the help he</v>

00:55:22.240 --> 00:55:23.760
<v Speaker 1>probably needs, right?</v>

00:55:24.160 --> 00:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you know, drug addicts are innocent, but I am</v>

00:55:27.920 --> 00:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>saying we have a duty to help them, the ones that can</v>

00:55:30.480 --> 00:55:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be helped.</v>

00:55:31.360 --> 00:55:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Get them the treatment they need and also force them to work.</v>

00:55:34.640 --> 00:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's part of it, right?</v>

00:55:35.520 --> 00:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Round up the homeless, force them to work, get them treatment for</v>

00:55:38.080 --> 00:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>their various ailments which are probably both physical and mental.</v>

00:55:41.200 --> 00:55:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't let them just roam free and destroy themselves and everything else.</v>

00:55:45.120 --> 00:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You can t treat both sides at that same time.</v>

00:55:48.320 --> 00:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to pick one or the other, right?</v>

00:55:49.920 --> 00:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be anti homeless to the point of being</v>

00:55:52.560 --> 00:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>cruel, you don't have to be pro homeless to the point of</v>

00:55:55.040 --> 00:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>being cruel in a different way.</v>

00:55:58.640 --> 00:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But the sort of foundational point there is what I already said.</v>

00:56:02.160 --> 00:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You're part of society.</v>

00:56:03.520 --> 00:56:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And what you do affects others and what others do affects you.</v>

00:56:06.320 --> 00:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to disentangle that.</v>

00:56:08.560 --> 00:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>No man is an island, no man gets to say I am</v>

00:56:11.360 --> 00:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a dependent on no one else, I am totally wildly, absolutely independent,</v>

00:56:16.080 --> 00:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>no one else affects me, I affect no one else.</v>

00:56:19.040 --> 00:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Even if you are living out in the woods as a hermit,</v>

00:56:21.520 --> 00:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not totally true, right?</v>

00:56:22.640 --> 00:56:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can take the Amish example.</v>

00:56:25.200 --> 00:56:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The Amish are relatively isolated from society.</v>

00:56:28.960 --> 00:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Society still affects them, at the very least in a particular way.</v>

00:56:34.400 --> 00:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>What happens if we stop defending them, right?</v>

00:56:38.000 --> 00:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not the Amish who field soldiers to keep in theory,</v>

00:56:42.880 --> 00:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>anyway, the border secure and all those things.</v>

00:56:44.880 --> 00:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's say we live in a functioning state instead of this one.</v>

00:56:47.280 --> 00:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But in a functioning state, the Amish are protected by the state</v>

00:56:50.960 --> 00:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>despite not contributing to it.</v>

00:56:52.960 --> 00:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So they are still affected by what happens outside of their isolated</v>

00:56:56.880 --> 00:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>community. No one is isolated, everyone is interconnected, and so the claims</v>

00:57:01.120 --> 00:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of libertarianism are just ridiculous on their face, in particular this one.</v>

00:57:08.720 --> 00:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Question</v>

00:57:12.320 --> 00:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>five, which my tab has disappeared so let me open Question six</v>

00:57:16.800 --> 00:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>rather my tab disappeared.</v>

00:57:18.480 --> 00:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Question six Mother qualities in your personal experience as a son, what</v>

00:57:24.640 --> 00:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are the most important qualities a mother can possess can possess to</v>

00:57:28.000 --> 00:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>raise a boy into a man that will be well grounded in</v>

00:57:31.440 --> 00:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>his ability to navigate the world.</v>

00:57:34.240 --> 00:57:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And take a sip of my drink before I continue.</v>

00:57:42.720 --> 00:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I will fully answer this one, and I</v>

00:57:45.520 --> 00:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know that there was a comment in my chat about looking forward</v>

00:57:47.760 --> 00:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to my answer here, and so don't be too disappointed.</v>

00:57:50.400 --> 00:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But I am working on some essays and things about women and</v>

00:57:56.000 --> 00:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>marriage and things like that, and I'll leave some of it for</v>

00:57:58.560 --> 00:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that because some of it requires a little greater treatment in depth</v>

00:58:03.040 --> 00:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>than I'll necessarily go into here.</v>

00:58:05.120 --> 00:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But I can certainly touch on sort of the overarching truth, the</v>

00:58:08.880 --> 00:58:09.920
<v Speaker 1>core of it here.</v>

00:58:09.920 --> 00:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And the core of it is, as a wife, one of the</v>

00:58:14.800 --> 00:58:18.160
<v Speaker 1>things you're doing is modeling what it means to be a good</v>

00:58:18.160 --> 00:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>woman and a good wife for your sons and for your daughters,</v>

00:58:21.680 --> 00:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly. I don't know if God has blessed you with daughters as</v>

00:58:25.200 --> 00:58:27.600
<v Speaker 1>well, but at least in theory, if God blesses you with daughters</v>

00:58:27.680 --> 00:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or has blessed you with daughters, so your hypothetical daughters.</v>

00:58:31.200 --> 00:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You are modelling what it means to be a wife and a</v>

00:58:34.960 --> 00:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>mother. And so that is important for both boys and girls.</v>

00:58:39.680 --> 00:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Because in theory, your boys will marry women at some point in</v>

00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the future.</v>

00:58:44.320 --> 00:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the things they'll start looking for is some of the</v>

00:58:46.640 --> 00:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>attributes you have shown to be good in women in wives and</v>

00:58:50.880 --> 00:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>mothers. The same thing will be true for your daughters when they</v>

00:58:55.120 --> 00:58:57.600
<v Speaker 1>start taking on those roles for themselves.</v>

00:58:57.600 --> 00:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>That is sort of one of the fundamental things that you are</v>

00:59:01.760 --> 00:59:05.440
<v Speaker 1>doing in your role as a wife and a mother.</v>

00:59:05.440 --> 00:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:59:07.120 --> 00:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the best things you can do is just be a</v>

00:59:09.920 --> 00:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>good wife and mother, because they are looking to you as that</v>

00:59:12.800 --> 00:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>example. They will, of course, look to others as examples as well.</v>

00:59:16.240 --> 00:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that's bad because sometimes it is looking to Hollywood, which is</v>

00:59:20.720 --> 00:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously not great.</v>

00:59:22.400 --> 00:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But say if you have other couples and their children who are</v>

00:59:26.720 --> 00:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>around often, they'll look to that as well.</v>

00:59:29.040 --> 00:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Children absorb a lot from what is around them.</v>

00:59:32.160 --> 00:59:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the ways we learn, right?</v>

00:59:34.160 --> 00:59:37.360
<v Speaker 1>They're basically a passive sponge early on.</v>

00:59:37.360 --> 00:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So how you model things in your home and how you permit</v>

00:59:41.920 --> 00:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>things to be modeled around your children is going to influence them</v>

00:59:46.960 --> 00:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>massively going forward.</v>

00:59:49.680 --> 00:59:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So take that into account.</v>

00:59:52.080 --> 00:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Take into account the people with whom you associate.</v>

00:59:54.800 --> 00:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Take into account what your children see, how they see you interacting</v>

00:59:58.640 --> 01:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with your husband, how you interact with them, because that's their model</v>

01:00:02.240 --> 01:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of a mother.</v>

01:00:03.200 --> 01:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the mental model they're building up.</v>

01:00:05.760 --> 01:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So obviously mother is not an unserious or a light office.</v>

01:00:11.440 --> 01:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a fundamentally important thing.</v>

01:00:13.920 --> 01:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And And make sure that you're doing what you should according to</v>

01:00:17.360 --> 01:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>scripture and the reason, the wisdom that God has entrusted to you.</v>

01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And just as a sort of general comment, I won't necessarily get</v>

01:00:28.160 --> 01:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>into</v>

01:00:30.240 --> 01:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>right the depth of it that I want to treat with those</v>

01:00:33.200 --> 01:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>essays instead of here, but there's currently</v>

01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to call it animus.</v>

01:00:40.160 --> 01:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>There's rather a lot of animus between the sexes, particularly among the</v>

01:00:43.520 --> 01:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>younger generations, to be blunt.</v>

01:00:45.760 --> 01:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Particularly with the zoomers and younger, it's happening in Gen Alpha as</v>

01:00:49.680 --> 01:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>well. And it is a serious problem, right?</v>

01:00:52.720 --> 01:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no future if the sexes don't get along, at least well</v>

01:00:56.560 --> 01:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>enough. And God made woman to be a helper fit for man,</v>

01:01:02.560 --> 01:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not to be a competitor, not for woman to hate man or</v>

01:01:05.520 --> 01:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for man to hate woman.</v>

01:01:06.880 --> 01:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Men and women are not the same.</v>

01:01:08.320 --> 01:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't expect men and women to be the same.</v>

01:01:10.560 --> 01:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't expect women to act like men or men to act like</v>

01:01:13.600 --> 01:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>women. That's leftism, that's transsexualism, that's transgenderism, that's complete nonsense.</v>

01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Expect women to act like women and men to act like men.</v>

01:01:24.160 --> 01:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It's important to model both.</v>

01:01:26.160 --> 01:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Your husband models how a man should act, you model how a</v>

01:01:29.600 --> 01:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>woman should act.</v>

01:01:30.720 --> 01:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>That is things functioning as they should.</v>

01:01:33.520 --> 01:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

01:01:34.800 --> 01:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>if we don't do something about that animus between the sexes that</v>

01:01:40.560 --> 01:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is just growing unchecked and is certainly fueled by social media and</v>

01:01:46.400 --> 01:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is fueled algorithmically deliberately to make people crazy and behave in this</v>

01:01:51.760 --> 01:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>way. So maybe consider limiting social media access as well.</v>

01:01:55.920 --> 01:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>If we don't get a handle on that, then we are just</v>

01:01:59.840 --> 01:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have continually worse problems in the future, and we have</v>

01:02:03.760 --> 01:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>problems enough now.</v>

01:02:05.360 --> 01:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We do not need to add on top of all of the</v>

01:02:07.920 --> 01:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges we face in a biting hatred between the sexes, who are</v>

01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to love one another and make it possible to have future</v>

01:02:17.520 --> 01:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>generations. Because as a race, you have no future if men and</v>

01:02:22.160 --> 01:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>women don't get along.</v>

01:02:23.920 --> 01:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we all understand how biology and all those things work,</v>

01:02:27.200 --> 01:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>right? There is no next generation, there is no future without marriage.</v>

01:02:33.040 --> 01:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's important to model that role as a wife and a</v>

01:02:38.320 --> 01:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>mother</v>

01:02:39.520 --> 01:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't, then your sons are going to have to</v>

01:02:43.360 --> 01:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>absorb that from somewhere else.</v>

01:02:45.040 --> 01:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And it will probably be the culture at large and that will</v>

01:02:48.080 --> 01:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>probably not work out well for them.</v>

01:02:49.360 --> 01:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>They will then learn all the lessons the hard way, that it</v>

01:02:52.080 --> 01:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is much better to learn them the easy way and the correct</v>

01:02:55.120 --> 01:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>way than learning them the hard way, and doing it the wrong</v>

01:02:58.400 --> 01:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>way, and probably making a mess of your life at least for</v>

01:03:01.760 --> 01:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a period of years.</v>

01:03:04.160 --> 01:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, I will get more into this in some</v>

01:03:06.560 --> 01:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>essays that I've been planning, sort of mentally composing in my free</v>

01:03:10.880 --> 01:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time. I guess almost a tangentially related</v>

01:03:18.240 --> 01:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>question in a sense, but question seven.</v>

01:03:23.040 --> 01:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You have stated previously that men should only cry at specific times</v>

01:03:27.200 --> 01:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and events.</v>

01:03:28.160 --> 01:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Occasionally a hymn in church will really get me and cause tears</v>

01:03:31.520 --> 01:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to well up.</v>

01:03:32.560 --> 01:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you find this shameful?</v>

01:03:34.160 --> 01:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I weep for Christ's passion and I know there is no shame</v>

01:03:36.720 --> 01:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in that.</v>

01:03:37.280 --> 01:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Is this different?</v>

01:03:38.240 --> 01:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's permissible.</v>

01:03:40.240 --> 01:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess I can just answer that one very quickly.</v>

01:03:42.320 --> 01:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It is permissible to maybe don't openly weep as a man.</v>

01:03:45.680 --> 01:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>That's generally like something horrible has to have happened for that.</v>

01:03:49.680 --> 01:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean partly yes, I'm Germanic, so I'm going to have a</v>

01:03:52.400 --> 01:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>certain sensibility when it comes to these things, but Most Americans are</v>

01:03:56.800 --> 01:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>going to, right?</v>

01:03:57.520 --> 01:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Because Americans are mostly English and German, and there's the stiff upper</v>

01:04:00.960 --> 01:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>lip thing is not just the English, it's the Germans as well.</v>

01:04:03.600 --> 01:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>openly weeping in church is probably not going to be a great</v>

01:04:09.040 --> 01:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>plan, but if it you know tears well up, maybe you have</v>

01:04:11.920 --> 01:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to wipe away a tear.</v>

01:04:13.040 --> 01:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>That's I don't object to that.</v>

01:04:14.400 --> 01:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's perfectly fine.</v>

01:04:15.280 --> 01:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That's entirely reasonable.</v>

01:04:17.360 --> 01:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I would go so far as to say that's even fine if</v>

01:04:19.440 --> 01:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that occasionally happens in the theater.</v>

01:04:22.640 --> 01:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, I mean the actual theater, I don't mean</v>

01:04:25.280 --> 01:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood slop that nothing they produce warrants that level of emotion</v>

01:04:30.320 --> 01:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>these days.</v>

01:04:31.280 --> 01:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But certain plays, certain operas are w very well designed, and if</v>

01:04:35.840 --> 01:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they elicit that sort of emotion, I don't think it's entirely inappropriate.</v>

01:04:38.800 --> 01:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And certainly Christ's passion and certain hymns.</v>

01:04:41.760 --> 01:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you've lost someone near and dear to you, say</v>

01:04:45.760 --> 01:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in the past year and then we get to All Saints or</v>

01:04:49.120 --> 01:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>whichever one of the calendar celebrations you use and you know you're</v>

01:04:54.800 --> 01:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>singing for all the saints and you happen to have a couple</v>

01:04:56.960 --> 01:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>tears in your eyes, I think that's perfectly reasonable I don't think</v>

01:04:59.920 --> 01:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's shameful or impermissible.</v>

01:05:05.360 --> 01:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Question eight.</v>

01:05:06.640 --> 01:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to drink a little more coffee first.</v>

01:05:12.480 --> 01:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know to how many questions I will get.</v>

01:05:15.280 --> 01:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how far we are into this episode.</v>

01:05:19.040 --> 01:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I have not been paying attention.</v>

01:05:22.320 --> 01:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We are</v>

01:05:27.280 --> 01:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>More into the episode episode than I thought, but I'll keep going</v>

01:05:30.560 --> 01:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for a while.</v>

01:05:31.120 --> 01:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have anything else I necessarily have to do in the</v>

01:05:34.720 --> 01:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>next twenty-thirty minutes.</v>

01:05:37.520 --> 01:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Question eight.</v>

01:05:38.480 --> 01:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Could you will please elaborate on your tweet that the Great Commission</v>

01:05:42.240 --> 01:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>has been fulfilled, and that our mission now is to get our</v>

01:05:46.160 --> 01:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>people onto the ark, especially what the latter part means in practical</v>

01:05:51.440 --> 01:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>terms. So</v>

01:05:55.600 --> 01:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those where</v>

01:05:58.400 --> 01:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I could get pretty deep into it, and I don't always want</v>

01:06:01.600 --> 01:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to say this, but maybe I should write an article on this</v>

01:06:05.840 --> 01:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or this or maybe I'll shove this one off onto someone else.</v>

01:06:09.360 --> 01:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a person in mind to whom I may give this</v>

01:06:11.360 --> 01:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>particular task, if he is so willing.</v>

01:06:14.240 --> 01:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:06:15.600 --> 01:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I will give the answer from the Lutheran perspective because I am</v>

01:06:19.120 --> 01:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>most familiar with that, and quite frankly the Roman Catholics disagree, although</v>

01:06:23.920 --> 01:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they disagree for polemical reasons, not necessarily for theological reasons.</v>

01:06:29.520 --> 01:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know some Roman Catholics may object to that, but it</v>

01:06:32.800 --> 01:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is the reality of the historical interaction between the Roman Church and</v>

01:06:36.880 --> 01:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the Lutheran Church, right?</v>

01:06:39.680 --> 01:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:06:40.960 --> 01:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the polemical lines of attack against the</v>

01:06:45.680 --> 01:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Lutheran Church by the Roman Church, particularly in the post Reformation era,</v>

01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what would be called the Age of Lutheran Orthodoxy, so maybe the</v>

01:06:56.320 --> 01:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two ish centuries after the Reformation, a little later than that as</v>

01:07:00.400 --> 01:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>well, maybe all the way up through, say, the Saxon migration into</v>

01:07:04.880 --> 01:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>America, sort of an extension, but that sort of era.</v>

01:07:08.960 --> 01:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the attacks against the Lutherans by the Roman Catholics was</v>

01:07:14.240 --> 01:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>surely one of the signs of the true church must be that</v>

01:07:18.320 --> 01:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you have foreign missionaries because then you are pursuing the Great Commission.</v>

01:07:24.080 --> 01:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That was one of their arguments.</v>

01:07:26.320 --> 01:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>However, even earlier than that, there were many who had argued, so</v>

01:07:31.040 --> 01:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not specifically Lutheran, I'm going to go over the Lutherans</v>

01:07:33.520 --> 01:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in more detail, but earlier than that, there were those who argued</v>

01:07:37.120 --> 01:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that essentially the Great Commission had been fulfilled in one of two</v>

01:07:41.920 --> 01:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ways. Usually they argued that it was fulfilled during the apostolic era</v>

01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because the apostles had gone to all the great races of men,</v>

01:07:51.200 --> 01:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>right? And so not every single little subdivision of humanity had been</v>

01:07:56.400 --> 01:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>reached, but it had gone out to the sons of Shem, it</v>

01:08:00.960 --> 01:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>had gone out to the sons of Japheth, it had gone out</v>

01:08:03.440 --> 01:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to the sons of Ham.</v>

01:08:05.120 --> 01:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You even see that fulfillment in the New Testament, right?</v>

01:08:09.600 --> 01:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>The many of the early converts were formerly Jewish.</v>

01:08:13.360 --> 01:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Those are the sons of Shem.</v>

01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You have Arabs in the same area, sons of Shem, with Hemitic</v>

01:08:19.840 --> 01:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>admixture. You have the Ethiopian, right?</v>

01:08:22.560 --> 01:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>The Ethiopian eunuch.</v>

01:08:23.920 --> 01:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Well he goes back to the court of one of the countries</v>

01:08:27.440 --> 01:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in Africa, that's Ham.</v>

01:08:29.600 --> 01:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You have Rome and you have the Greeks, that's Japheth.</v>

01:08:33.040 --> 01:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So you see this sort of fulfillment in the apostolic era, and</v>

01:08:37.600 --> 01:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>then the additional argument on top of that was that the gospel</v>

01:08:41.360 --> 01:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>had already been heard by all men, because it was passed down</v>

01:08:45.040 --> 01:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>from Adam, through Noah, to his sons and the patriarchs of the</v>

01:08:50.240 --> 01:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>various great races, and had been retained or lost.</v>

01:08:53.600 --> 01:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So everyone had the opportunity to hear it already.</v>

01:08:56.160 --> 01:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the two arguments.</v>

01:08:58.000 --> 01:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

01:08:59.920 --> 01:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there are those who will point out, and I've highlighted this before</v>

01:09:02.960 --> 01:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>just to dismiss it, but there are nations that didn't even exist</v>

01:09:07.520 --> 01:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when the Great Commission was given by Christ to the apostles, America</v>

01:09:12.480 --> 01:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist.</v>

01:09:13.680 --> 01:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>America's a distinct nation.</v>

01:09:15.680 --> 01:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So is it something going forward in perpetuity every time a new</v>

01:09:20.320 --> 01:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>subgroup is generated pops up?</v>

01:09:23.200 --> 01:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe so.</v>

01:09:24.640 --> 01:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I hold to the traditional Lutheran belief on this, which is essentially</v>

01:09:29.600 --> 01:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the two things I explained, with on top of that, you can</v>

01:09:34.240 --> 01:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>add, if you are so inclined, I kind of have perhaps mixed</v>

01:09:38.480 --> 01:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>feelings on it.</v>

01:09:39.200 --> 01:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is a strong argument.</v>

01:09:41.440 --> 01:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's a necessary component of the argument But</v>

01:09:44.960 --> 01:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the colonial period was also a rapid expansion and spread of the</v>

01:09:51.040 --> 01:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>New Testament era, you know, regeneration, restoration of the gospel message.</v>

01:09:56.880 --> 01:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that even if you don't want to say</v>

01:09:58.960 --> 01:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it was fulfilled in the apostolic era, certainly it was fulfilled by</v>

01:10:02.640 --> 01:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>colonialism in which the sons of Japheth took the gospel to all</v>

01:10:06.800 --> 01:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the corners of the world, including little tiny tribes in the middle</v>

01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere.</v>

01:10:11.360 --> 01:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think every weird island people everywhere on Earth has to</v>

01:10:15.520 --> 01:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hear the gospel before it's fulfilled.</v>

01:10:18.240 --> 01:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a modern and sort of mercenary interpretation used to</v>

01:10:22.960 --> 01:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fund foreign missions and things like that.</v>

01:10:24.800 --> 01:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>In some cases it's ignorance, in many cases I think there's a</v>

01:10:27.440 --> 01:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of malice involved.</v>

01:10:30.080 --> 01:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Lutheran theologians from the age of orthodoxy, Gerhard is one</v>

01:10:35.120 --> 01:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>particular example, and there's another one I posted a quote from him</v>

01:10:38.720 --> 01:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>before I started the stream I posted it on X and also</v>

01:10:41.920 --> 01:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on Telegram, but I'll read that as well.</v>

01:10:44.880 --> 01:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Ursinus</v>

01:10:46.960 --> 01:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>These are two examples of men who basically just categorically said that</v>

01:10:50.640 --> 01:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the great Commission's been fulfilled.</v>

01:10:52.960 --> 01:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>This is no longer a thing.</v>

01:10:55.360 --> 01:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And Gerhard's argument was essentially that there were three things passed down</v>

01:11:00.720 --> 01:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>from the apostles to subsequent Christians, and particularly with regard to, say,</v>

01:11:06.960 --> 01:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the pastorate, right?</v>

01:11:07.920 --> 01:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You have the sacraments.</v>

01:11:09.200 --> 01:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But the important one here is whether or not there was that</v>

01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>generic and general</v>

01:11:16.800 --> 01:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>command to go to all the corners of the world and spread</v>

01:11:20.560 --> 01:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the gospel.</v>

01:11:21.840 --> 01:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Gerhard came down hard on the no side because his argument and</v>

01:11:26.960 --> 01:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Luther, you also have this in a certain form in Luther as</v>

01:11:30.480 --> 01:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>well. Their argument essentially is that the pastor has a mediate call,</v>

01:11:34.800 --> 01:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and the immediate call is to say that it is to his</v>

01:11:37.920 --> 01:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>specific congregation and his locality, not to the world generally.</v>

01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And so the argument is that that general or universal call to</v>

01:11:45.440 --> 01:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the world was passed to the apostles, but not down to future</v>

01:11:50.880 --> 01:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>clergy, future Christians.</v>

01:11:53.120 --> 01:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I happen to think that he is largely right in his argument.</v>

01:11:56.560 --> 01:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I might quibble with some things, but I think that is a</v>

01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>fair general assessment.</v>

01:12:01.120 --> 01:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Ursinus went further, right?</v>

01:12:03.040 --> 01:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll go ahead and read the the translation of his comment.</v>

01:12:07.280 --> 01:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>His original comment was in German.</v>

01:12:09.120 --> 01:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I may find a way to translate that whole document because it</v>

01:12:12.320 --> 01:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>probably would be useful to have it, but let me pull that</v>

01:12:15.840 --> 01:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>up.</v>

01:12:19.840 --> 01:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So So, one of his comments, and this is going to sound</v>

01:12:23.440 --> 01:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>harsh to certainly modern Christian years, but this is the sort of</v>

01:12:27.280 --> 01:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that you heard from theologians in the 1600s, the 1700s, even</v>

01:12:31.280 --> 01:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>into the 18th and early nineteen hundreds, many heathen peoples are savages</v>

01:12:36.400 --> 01:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>who have absolutely nothing human about them and are therefore impervious to</v>

01:12:41.600 --> 01:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the gospel.</v>

01:12:43.680 --> 01:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's from an Orthodox Lutheran theologian in the 1600s.</v>

01:12:47.760 --> 01:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That was the sort of things that they were writing, and then</v>

01:12:50.160 --> 01:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>today we get condemned for saying, you know, there are differences between</v>

01:12:53.200 --> 01:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>people groups, right?</v>

01:12:55.280 --> 01:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Completely ridiculous.</v>

01:12:57.440 --> 01:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But I I do happen to believe that the Great Commission was</v>

01:13:02.640 --> 01:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>indeed fulfilled.</v>

01:13:03.520 --> 01:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I do not think that we have a general duty to go</v>

01:13:06.240 --> 01:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to all the corners of the world at this point and find</v>

01:13:09.440 --> 01:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>every little subgroup of people who speak some pidgin form of a</v>

01:13:12.800 --> 01:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>language</v>

01:13:14.080 --> 01:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and try to get them to believe in the gospel.</v>

01:13:16.960 --> 01:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been fulfilled.</v>

01:13:19.200 --> 01:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But with that sort of background in place now, the actual question</v>

01:13:24.800 --> 01:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that was asked here is what do I mean by get our</v>

01:13:28.080 --> 01:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people into the ark?</v>

01:13:29.520 --> 01:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I gave the background is because it lays the</v>

01:13:32.320 --> 01:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>foundation of what I mean by that.</v>

01:13:34.400 --> 01:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean our duty is to our own people, to our own</v>

01:13:37.200 --> 01:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>blood, to our own race, to our own nation, to get them</v>

01:13:41.600 --> 01:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>back into the Christian church, which the Christian Church write is the</v>

01:13:45.280 --> 01:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>greater arc.</v>

01:13:46.560 --> 01:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the greater ark, it is the one that saves you</v>

01:13:49.120 --> 01:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not from temporal death, from from eternal death.</v>

01:13:52.560 --> 01:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And so that is our duty now, not to go to the</v>

01:13:56.720 --> 01:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>furthest reaches of the world.</v>

01:13:58.480 --> 01:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Luther, incidentally, in some of his arguments against this kind of stuff,</v>

01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>used India as the example to furthest India, farthest India, right?</v>

01:14:08.320 --> 01:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not our duty.</v>

01:14:10.080 --> 01:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Our duty is to our own.</v>

01:14:11.600 --> 01:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>God has put you in a time and a place.</v>

01:14:13.280 --> 01:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He has put people in your life.</v>

01:14:14.640 --> 01:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>He has made you a certain type of person, right?</v>

01:14:17.600 --> 01:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a race, you have an identity, you have all these</v>

01:14:21.040 --> 01:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are inherent to who and what you are.</v>

01:14:23.440 --> 01:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He has put you where you are, given you the things you</v>

01:14:26.160 --> 01:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have, and entrusted certain duties to your care.</v>

01:14:29.360 --> 01:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not to sail across the ocean and find random people in</v>

01:14:34.080 --> 01:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the jungle so you can feel good about yourself and say, look</v>

01:14:37.120 --> 01:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at how holy I am and what I've done.</v>

01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And the reason people do that is because you know what's very</v>

01:14:42.640 --> 01:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult and hard to do?</v>

01:14:44.240 --> 01:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's to approach your own people and care about them and try</v>

01:14:47.840 --> 01:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to do what is best for them and try to get them</v>

01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>back into the Christian church.</v>

01:14:51.920 --> 01:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's way easier to sail across the world, get paid to go</v>

01:14:56.240 --> 01:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on a vacation, even if it's not somewhere necessarily that pleasant, these</v>

01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>people still enjoy it, and try to get someone with an IQ</v>

01:15:02.240 --> 01:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of seventy to believe you about Jesus.</v>

01:15:06.160 --> 01:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That's easier.</v>

01:15:07.360 --> 01:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The harder work is here.</v>

01:15:09.040 --> 01:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And so people want the easy task instead of the hard work,</v>

01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because that one gets them praise, this one gets you hated.</v>

01:15:15.760 --> 01:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So pick the harder task because it's the right one, it's the</v>

01:15:18.800 --> 01:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>one God has entrusted to your care So that is what I</v>

01:15:22.320 --> 01:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mean by getting our people into the ark.</v>

01:15:24.080 --> 01:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not a matter of saving the rest of the wicked world.</v>

01:15:27.280 --> 01:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We've done enough.</v>

01:15:29.040 --> 01:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Right? Noah preached, prophesied for long enough about the flood that was</v>

01:15:35.760 --> 01:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>coming, and then he got his people into the Ark and saved</v>

01:15:38.560 --> 01:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>them. Our duty is to get our own people into the church,</v>

01:15:42.080 --> 01:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>into the actual Ark and save them, not to go hunting around</v>

01:15:45.920 --> 01:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of the corners of the world for people who</v>

01:15:48.240 --> 01:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>won't convert anyway.</v>

01:15:52.400 --> 01:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Question nine.</v>

01:15:53.920 --> 01:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I have been going to my church for almost two years now.</v>

01:15:58.240 --> 01:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't become a member or communed because on the altar where</v>

01:16:01.760 --> 01:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we kneel there is an assortment of crosses, but there are a</v>

01:16:05.280 --> 01:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>few stars of Remphan mixed in.</v>

01:16:08.160 --> 01:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The church is faithful, the pastor is faithful enough, seems to be</v>

01:16:12.400 --> 01:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the crosses seem to be the symbols rather seem to be left</v>

01:16:15.680 --> 01:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>over from the builders of the church.</v>

01:16:17.680 --> 01:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I commune on that?</v>

01:16:18.880 --> 01:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It feels wrong.</v>

01:16:20.800 --> 01:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer here is Yes, you can commune, and the</v>

01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>longer answer involves</v>

01:16:29.600 --> 01:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into the full answer because the full</v>

01:16:31.600 --> 01:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>answer is long, but the longer answer is</v>

01:16:36.640 --> 01:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the symbol is not always a Jewish symbol, right?</v>

01:16:40.240 --> 01:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not always Talmudic.</v>

01:16:42.560 --> 01:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And there are a few ways to explain that and defend that</v>

01:16:47.440 --> 01:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>conclusion. One of them is that we have historical use in places</v>

01:16:52.080 --> 01:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that were entirely faithful.</v>

01:16:53.920 --> 01:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>They just happen to have used the symbol for other reasons or</v>

01:16:57.520 --> 01:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>adopted it with misconceptions.</v>

01:16:59.280 --> 01:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's usually later on.</v>

01:17:00.800 --> 01:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>That's usually medieval versus early churches.</v>

01:17:03.520 --> 01:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But even in the early church, you see this in some places,</v>

01:17:05.840 --> 01:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there are Greek churches that we know had this symbol and some</v>

01:17:08.320 --> 01:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that still have the symbol.</v>

01:17:10.400 --> 01:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And it is not always a wicked thing.</v>

01:17:14.320 --> 01:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It has become a wicked thing, so we should no longer use</v>

01:17:18.080 --> 01:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it, but it has been used in ways that were not wicked</v>

01:17:21.360 --> 01:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past.</v>

01:17:22.800 --> 01:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Which leads into the second part of my answer, which is why.</v>

01:17:27.600 --> 01:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The why is very simple.</v>

01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a very easy to draw geometric figure.</v>

01:17:34.160 --> 01:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is just that simple, right?</v>

01:17:35.920 --> 01:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's two triangles, one flipped.</v>

01:17:38.320 --> 01:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:17:39.920 --> 01:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you do have the argument.</v>

01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of supported historically.</v>

01:17:45.840 --> 01:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not the strongest argument, but you do have the argument that</v>

01:17:48.720 --> 01:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's symbolic of, say, heaven and earth combined with the triangle being</v>

01:17:53.200 --> 01:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a symbol of the Trinity, right?</v>

01:17:55.120 --> 01:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You have that.</v>

01:17:56.480 --> 01:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But you also have it's a star.</v>

01:17:59.040 --> 01:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>There is symbolism of stars in Christianity.</v>

01:18:02.880 --> 01:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It is, again, very simple to draw.</v>

01:18:05.440 --> 01:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to draw with the tools they would have had, right?</v>

01:18:08.560 --> 01:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You can draw that with a piece of wood and a chisel.</v>

01:18:11.760 --> 01:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to be very good to draw that particular symbol.</v>

01:18:15.120 --> 01:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So part of it is just that it's easy to make, but</v>

01:18:19.360 --> 01:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it has become a wicked symbol because of how it has been</v>

01:18:23.120 --> 01:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>used in subsequent centuries.</v>

01:18:25.200 --> 01:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily so from the beginning.</v>

01:18:27.760 --> 01:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Was there some wicked stuff in the beginning that was, say, Gnostic</v>

01:18:31.600 --> 01:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or esoteric?</v>

01:18:32.560 --> 01:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you get it connected to the key of Solomon, the seal</v>

01:18:35.040 --> 01:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of Solomon, and stuff like that.</v>

01:18:36.800 --> 01:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But you also have Christian arguments for it saying it is representative</v>

01:18:39.840 --> 01:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the six days of creation, being a six pointed star, six</v>

01:18:43.280 --> 01:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>being the number of humanity, six being one of the numbers in</v>

01:18:46.240 --> 01:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Scripture that has meaning attached to it.</v>

01:18:50.160 --> 01:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So is it inherently, you know, 666?</v>

01:18:53.360 --> 01:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>The answer is no.</v>

01:18:54.880 --> 01:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>In this case it seems like it's probably innocent.</v>

01:18:57.600 --> 01:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Should they have done it?</v>

01:18:58.640 --> 01:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>No. Did they do it with wicked intent?</v>

01:19:01.200 --> 01:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think most likely not.</v>

01:19:03.040 --> 01:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you approaching the altar with wicked intent?</v>

01:19:06.240 --> 01:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Clearly no.</v>

01:19:07.200 --> 01:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Is your pastor doing wicked intent?</v>

01:19:09.200 --> 01:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like no.</v>

01:19:10.640 --> 01:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's just an innocent mistake in this case.</v>

01:19:13.840 --> 01:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It should not have been used, but it was used for reasons</v>

01:19:16.400 --> 01:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that were not wicked.</v>

01:19:18.000 --> 01:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:19:19.520 --> 01:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can you commune yes.</v>

01:19:21.360 --> 01:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Should the symbol be removed if it can be done without, you</v>

01:19:24.240 --> 01:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know, destroying the entire altar or something?</v>

01:19:26.800 --> 01:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer again is yes.</v>

01:19:28.720 --> 01:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been to churches that had the symbol in the stained glass,</v>

01:19:31.360 --> 01:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>some of which it's been there for centuries, right?</v>

01:19:34.400 --> 01:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to say you have to destroy the stained glass</v>

01:19:37.040 --> 01:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because the symbol in the interim has become used by wicked people</v>

01:19:40.800 --> 01:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to mean wicked things.</v>

01:19:42.240 --> 01:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's overboard.</v>

01:19:44.160 --> 01:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you explain why it's there so people understand?</v>

01:19:47.440 --> 01:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think that's your burden going forward.</v>

01:19:49.680 --> 01:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But the short answer is yes, I think you can commune there</v>

01:19:52.240 --> 01:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're not you're not endangering your soul doing that.</v>

01:19:59.920 --> 01:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Question ten.</v>

01:20:01.760 --> 01:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I can finally get to my board that I've been staring at</v>

01:20:04.640 --> 01:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>here and not using because I just got through the questions that</v>

01:20:07.040 --> 01:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>were on my Written pad next to me.</v>

01:20:11.440 --> 01:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:20:13.360 --> 01:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what is the application of James 2 3 and what is the</v>

01:20:17.440 --> 01:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>scope personal slash public?</v>

01:20:19.840 --> 01:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this verse about justice or just how harshly you scrutinize someone?</v>

01:20:25.040 --> 01:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's go ahead and pull up James 2.3</v>

01:20:43.120 --> 01:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's actually start with James 2 2.</v>

01:20:45.600 --> 01:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So we actually we'll start with 2 1 so we get the</v>

01:20:47.840 --> 01:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the full context here.</v>

01:20:50.240 --> 01:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>My brothers show no partiality as you hold the faith in our</v>

01:20:53.520 --> 01:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, for if a man wearing</v>

01:20:57.120 --> 01:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a gold ring in fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a</v>

01:21:00.720 --> 01:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, and if you pay</v>

01:21:04.320 --> 01:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, You</v>

01:21:07.600 --> 01:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sit here in a good place, while you say to the poor</v>

01:21:10.160 --> 01:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>man, you stand over there, or sit down at my feet.</v>

01:21:14.240 --> 01:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with</v>

01:21:18.080 --> 01:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>evil thoughts?</v>

01:21:20.480 --> 01:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And so first off I would say this is one of those</v>

01:21:22.480 --> 01:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>cases where, as you can clearly see Clearly see if you read</v>

01:21:24.800 --> 01:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the context, including the following verse than the previous verses, then it</v>

01:21:29.600 --> 01:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of brings the interpretation with it, right?</v>

01:21:32.240 --> 01:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You have become judges with evil thoughts.</v>

01:21:35.440 --> 01:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing this for wicked reasons, right, it's oh this man</v>

01:21:38.080 --> 01:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can help me pay my mortgage or whatever it happens to be,</v>

01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>less of an issue back then, but certainly today.</v>

01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Then yes, you're doing it for wicked reasons.</v>

01:21:46.320 --> 01:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're not supposed to show partiality in that way.</v>

01:21:49.040 --> 01:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Is partiality always a wicked thing?</v>

01:21:51.520 --> 01:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>No, you are supposed to be partial to the example I often</v>

01:21:54.320 --> 01:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>use is your wife, right?</v>

01:21:56.160 --> 01:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to treat her better than others.</v>

01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>If you get ice cream, you share it with your wife.</v>

01:22:00.960 --> 01:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't share it with every person you pass on the street.</v>

01:22:03.280 --> 01:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be very weird.</v>

01:22:04.560 --> 01:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that.</v>

01:22:06.160 --> 01:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So partiality when it is for a wicked reason is a wicked</v>

01:22:10.720 --> 01:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thing. Partiality when it's for a good reason or even a morally</v>

01:22:14.560 --> 01:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>commanded reason is a good thing.</v>

01:22:17.120 --> 01:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So here in the church, you're not supposed to show this kind</v>

01:22:20.080 --> 01:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of wicked partiality.</v>

01:22:21.760 --> 01:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You're not saying we'll treat the wealthy well because the wealthy can</v>

01:22:25.440 --> 01:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>help us.</v>

01:22:26.320 --> 01:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>No, because what you're doing in the church is you are welcoming</v>

01:22:29.600 --> 01:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>sinners to give them the gifts of God, and sinners receive the</v>

01:22:33.920 --> 01:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>gifts of God, whether they are wealthy or poor, whether they're intelligent</v>

01:22:37.680 --> 01:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or not, whatever it happens to be, because God's gifts are available</v>

01:22:41.440 --> 01:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to all men.</v>

01:22:42.800 --> 01:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:22:44.240 --> 01:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this is not a matter of you can't ever show partiality.</v>

01:22:48.720 --> 01:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a matter of how you are to behave in the</v>

01:22:51.280 --> 01:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>church with regard to these things.</v>

01:22:53.280 --> 01:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You do not get to say to someone, you are worthy of</v>

01:22:56.640 --> 01:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>salvation because you can pay for the sanctuary renovation.</v>

01:23:00.400 --> 01:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You are unworthy of salvation because you can't put anything in the</v>

01:23:04.480 --> 01:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>coffers, right?</v>

01:23:05.600 --> 01:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a fundamentally wicked thing to do.</v>

01:23:07.360 --> 01:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that.</v>

01:23:08.560 --> 01:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have to understand the context that is involved here.</v>

01:23:12.880 --> 01:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And obviously it goes on to critique the rich for certain things</v>

01:23:15.520 --> 01:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's behaviors that are particular to the rich, right?</v>

01:23:18.240 --> 01:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>The rich are usually the ones going around suing people, because the</v>

01:23:21.440 --> 01:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>poor can't afford can't afford attorneys.</v>

01:23:24.080 --> 01:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the examples given later in the chapter.</v>

01:23:26.960 --> 01:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:23:28.720 --> 01:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that critique is particularly for the rich.</v>

01:23:30.800 --> 01:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>They should hear that and respond accordingly.</v>

01:23:33.120 --> 01:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But you have to take the context here of what is being</v>

01:23:35.600 --> 01:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>said. Don't do this stuff in the church.</v>

01:23:38.160 --> 01:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't show wicked partiality the same as you should not show it</v>

01:23:41.440 --> 01:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in your life, right?</v>

01:23:42.720 --> 01:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're on a jury, you shouldn't convict someone because he's poor.</v>

01:23:48.160 --> 01:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't pardon someone because he's rich.</v>

01:23:50.880 --> 01:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And you shouldn't do the verse.</v>

01:23:52.560 --> 01:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The reverse of that.</v>

01:23:53.840 --> 01:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It should be on the basis of the guilt or innocence of</v>

01:23:56.560 --> 01:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the party.</v>

01:23:57.520 --> 01:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's good partiality, there's wicked partiality.</v>

01:24:01.200 --> 01:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Bear that in mind when you are reading these verses, right?</v>

01:24:03.760 --> 01:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And just think of the easy example, right?</v>

01:24:05.440 --> 01:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You're partial to your wife, you don't show partiality according to this</v>

01:24:10.240 --> 01:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>outward appearance or wealth or something like that.</v>

01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>When it is not relevant to the matter at hand.</v>

01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>For instance, salvation.</v>

01:24:18.160 --> 01:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Particular critique of the Jews, because the Jews believed that if you</v>

01:24:22.240 --> 01:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>had enough money to pay for sacrifices and renovations to the synagogue</v>

01:24:26.480 --> 01:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, you were holier and closer to God and</v>

01:24:29.280 --> 01:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you got brownie points for it or something.</v>

01:24:31.520 --> 01:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's also that critique inherent in what is being said here.</v>

01:24:38.080 --> 01:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Think I will try to get through a a handful more questions</v>

01:24:41.200 --> 01:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>here, probably not too many.</v>

01:24:42.720 --> 01:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I do believe I have all the questions from the chat though.</v>

01:24:45.680 --> 01:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>My integration seems to be working quite well, so they're all up</v>

01:24:49.840 --> 01:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>here waiting for me to accept them and catalog them.</v>

01:24:54.320 --> 01:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:24:59.280 --> 01:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>take a note for myself here.</v>

01:25:14.640 --> 01:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Just wanted to refresh and see if it is updating it as</v>

01:25:17.840 --> 01:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it should.</v>

01:25:18.400 --> 01:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it is, so I think we're good.</v>

01:25:21.120 --> 01:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Question</v>

01:25:22.800 --> 01:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven. When it comes to having a monarchy, how should a king</v>

01:25:27.280 --> 01:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be decided on in countries without a proper monarchical history?</v>

01:25:31.440 --> 01:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>For example, Iceland, where its only king has also been the king</v>

01:25:36.560 --> 01:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of Denmark.</v>

01:25:38.720 --> 01:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a second related question, but I will take them</v>

01:25:43.920 --> 01:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as two separate questions Questions.</v>

01:25:48.240 --> 01:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So how you decide on right your first king, as it were,</v>

01:25:52.400 --> 01:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or in this case your first local king, is a matter of</v>

01:25:57.600 --> 01:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>wisdom. It is not something that is dictated in Scripture.</v>

01:26:00.320 --> 01:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It is not said you must absolutely do this.</v>

01:26:02.880 --> 01:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We are not Old Testament Israel, right?</v>

01:26:05.840 --> 01:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a prophet running around who is going to appear</v>

01:26:08.880 --> 01:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>with a vial of oil and pour it on a man's head</v>

01:26:11.200 --> 01:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and say, Congratulations, these people are your problem now.</v>

01:26:14.880 --> 01:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's a blessing or a curse for the man anointed, you</v>

01:26:18.640 --> 01:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>know, interpret that yourself.</v>

01:26:20.480 --> 01:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:26:22.560 --> 01:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we have We have to use the intellectual and other gifts that</v>

01:26:25.920 --> 01:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>God has entrusted to our care to make this assessment for ourselves.</v>

01:26:29.200 --> 01:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what our ancestors did when they drew up the various ways</v>

01:26:32.720 --> 01:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that they had for selecting their monarchs or approving their monarchs, whatever</v>

01:26:38.400 --> 01:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it happened to be, right?</v>

01:26:39.600 --> 01:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And we get into this with the the second question, so I</v>

01:26:42.720 --> 01:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>won't touch on it too much.</v>

01:26:44.400 --> 01:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the way you do it again is that</v>

01:26:47.360 --> 01:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>matter of wisdom.</v>

01:26:48.880 --> 01:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think I want to get into this second question to</v>

01:26:51.040 --> 01:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>give the specifics because I know what it asks already.</v>

01:26:53.760 --> 01:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So I will read that next question to get into the specifics</v>

01:26:58.320 --> 01:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully I didn't miss a number here.</v>

01:26:59.920 --> 01:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>This is question twelve if I numbered my pad correctly and did</v>

01:27:03.520 --> 01:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not miss one.</v>

01:27:04.800 --> 01:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>My little AI agent is thinking about something.</v>

01:27:08.480 --> 01:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>At any rate the question.</v>

01:27:09.920 --> 01:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And since we're on that topic, I'll quickly ask if you consider</v>

01:27:13.120 --> 01:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>absolute monarchy the ideal form of a monarchical government, or if you</v>

01:27:17.920 --> 01:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>prefer a more holy Roman Empire like system or Prussian constitutionalism.</v>

01:27:25.360 --> 01:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So I am not fond of so-called Constitutionalism, limited</v>

01:27:32.880 --> 01:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>monarchy, things like that.</v>

01:27:35.040 --> 01:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that I am not fond of that is that</v>

01:27:38.640 --> 01:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is</v>

01:27:41.120 --> 01:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really people lying to themselves.</v>

01:27:43.520 --> 01:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Because if you believe that a monarch is limited by a piece</v>

01:27:47.040 --> 01:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of paper, you are delusional.</v>

01:27:50.080 --> 01:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Right? Paper does not limit what a man can do.</v>

01:27:54.560 --> 01:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Paper can encourage a man to behave in certain ways, but power</v>

01:27:59.920 --> 01:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is what determines what a man can or cannot do.</v>

01:28:03.440 --> 01:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, power moderated by</v>

01:28:06.480 --> 01:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>morality, honor, cultural systems, all those sorts of things, but it is</v>

01:28:10.560 --> 01:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not a matter of what the piece of paper says.</v>

01:28:13.760 --> 01:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>If the king wants to burn the Constitution and do whatever he</v>

01:28:16.880 --> 01:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>pleases, then it's a matter of whether he has Whether he has</v>

01:28:18.800 --> 01:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the power to do that or not, not a matter of whether</v>

01:28:21.840 --> 01:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or not the Constitution says, please don't burn me at the top.</v>

01:28:25.200 --> 01:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not how it works.</v>

01:28:26.560 --> 01:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So I do not believe in constitutional monarchy or limited monarchy.</v>

01:28:31.440 --> 01:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the only rational approach approach is absolute monarchy.</v>

01:28:35.760 --> 01:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, does that mean you can't have a system that has sort</v>

01:28:39.680 --> 01:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of safeguards in place, right?</v>

01:28:41.200 --> 01:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the Holy Roman Empire, the electoral system, in that case, in</v>

01:28:44.800 --> 01:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense of electors, not in the sense of electoral politics like</v>

01:28:48.320 --> 01:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we have today.</v>

01:28:49.200 --> 01:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that that's perfectly permissible.</v>

01:28:51.040 --> 01:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's even a wise way to do it.</v>

01:28:53.840 --> 01:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>In an empire where you do have to devolve certain things be</v>

01:28:57.440 --> 01:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you have these different unique peoples all under one monarch, right?</v>

01:29:02.080 --> 01:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Because in the Holy Roman Empire you had different nations, different races.</v>

01:29:06.160 --> 01:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>They were not all the same people.</v>

01:29:07.920 --> 01:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You should probably have a unitary king over one single nation, but</v>

01:29:12.640 --> 01:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have what is effectively an empire instead, and I'm not</v>

01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>anti-empire, I'm definitely an imperialist when it comes to these things, I</v>

01:29:20.400 --> 01:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think that that Holy Roman Empire system is the better way to</v>

01:29:23.760 --> 01:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>go. But what I mean by an absolute monarch is that ultimately</v>

01:29:28.400 --> 01:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if you draw out the logic, the philosophy of it, the morality</v>

01:29:31.680 --> 01:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of it, the positive law depends upon the monarch.</v>

01:29:36.400 --> 01:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The law flows from the monarch, from his office, not necessarily from</v>

01:29:40.080 --> 01:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>his person.</v>

01:29:41.040 --> 01:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He is the avatar of the office.</v>

01:29:42.880 --> 01:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It flows from the office.</v>

01:29:44.720 --> 01:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>The positive law doesn't just appear from the ether and enforce itself</v>

01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on the people, on the nation.</v>

01:29:51.200 --> 01:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It flows through the monarch.</v>

01:29:53.600 --> 01:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The monarch is supposed to align himself and that law with the</v>

01:29:57.200 --> 01:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>natural law, but he ultimately is the foundation of that positive law.</v>

01:30:02.960 --> 01:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And for those who don't know, I've mentioned it before, but the</v>

01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>positive law is the written law that governs a country, right?</v>

01:30:08.160 --> 01:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Or it can be oral tradition as well, but it is the</v>

01:30:11.280 --> 01:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>man made law that governs the country.</v>

01:30:13.840 --> 01:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It may be consonant with, or identical to the moral law, right?</v>

01:30:18.160 --> 01:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Thou shalt not murder.</v>

01:30:20.320 --> 01:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't have to be identical.</v>

01:30:22.640 --> 01:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It is just you are morally obligated to be consonant in agreement</v>

01:30:26.320 --> 01:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with the moral law.</v>

01:30:27.440 --> 01:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So that positive law flows from is founded on the office of</v>

01:30:32.160 --> 01:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the monarch.</v>

01:30:33.440 --> 01:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't think you can reasonably say his power is</v>

01:30:37.200 --> 01:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>limited because he is the very source of the government in that</v>

01:30:41.120 --> 01:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>system. And I think that's the rightful way it's designed.</v>

01:30:43.920 --> 01:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And also as a Lutheran, in the confessions it does say the</v>

01:30:47.680 --> 01:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>king is above the law.</v>

01:30:49.600 --> 01:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>That's literally in our confession.</v>

01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to consider yourself as a Lutheran confessionally bound</v>

01:30:55.760 --> 01:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to believe that, I think that we are, go ahead and use</v>

01:30:59.200 --> 01:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that as well in your argument.</v>

01:31:00.560 --> 01:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Obviously not going to work with someone who's not Lutheran, but for</v>

01:31:02.880 --> 01:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>someone who's Lutheran, it is in there.</v>

01:31:05.040 --> 01:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Melanchthon wrote it, it's in our confession.</v>

01:31:12.560 --> 01:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Just looking at the chat for a second here.</v>

01:31:17.520 --> 01:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Looks like everything is still good.</v>

01:31:23.280 --> 01:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Question 13.</v>

01:31:26.240 --> 01:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you cope with being smarter than the people around you?</v>

01:31:29.520 --> 01:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I really struggle with this despite being only one standard deviation above</v>

01:31:32.880 --> 01:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>my family.</v>

01:31:33.680 --> 01:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Makes me feel like they don't even speak English.</v>

01:31:37.520 --> 01:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:31:39.280 --> 01:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the good news is if you are</v>

01:31:43.600 --> 01:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>one standard deviation different from those around you, that's not too big</v>

01:31:49.120 --> 01:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of a difference.</v>

01:31:50.160 --> 01:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>It's really sort of at the three SD mark that you start</v>

01:31:54.640 --> 01:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to have real issues conversing across that boundary.</v>

01:31:59.040 --> 01:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a a thread on this that I did recently.</v>

01:32:02.480 --> 01:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I was building up to an argument for the existence of God,</v>

01:32:05.440 --> 01:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but it also touches on the issue of genius AI related issues.</v>

01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So for one standard deviation, that's not much of a barrier.</v>

01:32:14.160 --> 01:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You can very readily talk to someone who is that close.</v>

01:32:17.600 --> 01:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Once you start getting into, like I said, three plus, you start</v>

01:32:22.400 --> 01:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>losing some of that shared vocabulary, there's really kind of a loss</v>

01:32:27.680 --> 01:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of a shared language, and it's appropriate the analogy you use there</v>

01:32:31.280 --> 01:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of speaking a different language.</v>

01:32:33.040 --> 01:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is compression, how much information you're fitting into the</v>

01:32:37.360 --> 01:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>same number of words, how much how much each word is carrying</v>

01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>along with it, right?</v>

01:32:42.960 --> 01:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Things like that.</v>

01:32:44.480 --> 01:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, it's it's not as big of a burden</v>

01:32:48.640 --> 01:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's just the one standard deviation difference.</v>

01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You can really communicate with someone who's that far away with relative</v>

01:32:54.480 --> 01:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ease. Yes, you're more intelligent than that person, but it's not so</v>

01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>much more intelligent that it's different in kind, right?</v>

01:33:02.560 --> 01:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really a matter of degree and not even a huge degree</v>

01:33:06.160 --> 01:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So don't focus on that.</v>

01:33:09.280 --> 01:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Never focus on how much more intelligent you are than the people</v>

01:33:12.160 --> 01:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>around you if you happen to be more intelligent than they are.</v>

01:33:15.120 --> 01:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a gift that God has entrusted to your care.</v>

01:33:18.560 --> 01:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's also a burden, right?</v>

01:33:20.640 --> 01:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Because many gifts are a duty, and there is a certain burden</v>

01:33:24.880 --> 01:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that is associated with duty.</v>

01:33:26.320 --> 01:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>There are things that you will have to do that others cannot</v>

01:33:29.840 --> 01:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do. You have to do them because God has given you the</v>

01:33:32.640 --> 01:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ability to do them.</v>

01:33:34.160 --> 01:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Particularly the case when you start talking about you know three, four,</v>

01:33:37.600 --> 01:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>five standard deviations or something, because then you have a shrinking pool</v>

01:33:41.920 --> 01:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the men who can do the things you can do.</v>

01:33:44.800 --> 01:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:33:46.400 --> 01:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>take it in the right light.</v>

01:33:48.400 --> 01:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Understand that it is a gift from God that comes with those</v>

01:33:50.880 --> 01:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>attendant duties.</v>

01:33:52.320 --> 01:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And by and large, don't think of yourself as being, you know,</v>

01:33:55.440 --> 01:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>something fundamentally different from other human beings, right?</v>

01:33:57.920 --> 01:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter how intelligent you are.</v>

01:34:01.120 --> 01:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you still enjoy many of the same things as other human beings,</v>

01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>right? There may be things you enjoy in a way that they</v>

01:34:06.880 --> 01:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>do not.</v>

01:34:08.400 --> 01:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's some aspects to some of the arts that you're</v>

01:34:11.360 --> 01:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>going to enjoy in say a fuller or a deeper way, but</v>

01:34:15.760 --> 01:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you're still going to like food and drink</v>

01:34:21.200 --> 01:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and and I I don't just mean alcohol there, but that's included.</v>

01:34:25.120 --> 01:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, going for a walk or a hike, playing with your</v>

01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>pets, like all of these things, you're still very much a human</v>

01:34:31.120 --> 01:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>being. You just happen to have a capacity that is higher in</v>

01:34:36.160 --> 01:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a particular way relative to most people.</v>

01:34:39.920 --> 01:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it is different to have the higher intelligence versus just</v>

01:34:43.520 --> 01:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to run fast or something, right?</v>

01:34:45.600 --> 01:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We all recognize that.</v>

01:34:46.720 --> 01:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>There's something fundamental about the way that intelligence interfaces with, interacts with,</v>

01:34:52.960 --> 01:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and modulates the expression of who and what you are fundamentally.</v>

01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So it is different in kind from certain other attributes.</v>

01:35:01.440 --> 01:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time you were still very much human, right?</v>

01:35:04.080 --> 01:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You have to eat, you have to drink, you have to sleep,</v>

01:35:06.400 --> 01:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you get headaches, you get tired, you know, you want a wife.</v>

01:35:10.480 --> 01:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter how intelligent you are, right?</v>

01:35:11.920 --> 01:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Unless God gave you the gift of celibacy, which he probably didn't,</v>

01:35:14.960 --> 01:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because almost no one has it.</v>

01:35:16.640 --> 01:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You're still a human being, act like a human being, get along</v>

01:35:19.840 --> 01:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with those around you as best you can.</v>

01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't expect everyone to understand things as quickly as you do or</v>

01:35:26.400 --> 01:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as thoroughly as you do.</v>

01:35:27.760 --> 01:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's wrong to demand that of them.</v>

01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We used to have some systems in place in society where you</v>

01:35:33.280 --> 01:35:37.760
<v Speaker 1>had some hierarchy and separation and deference and things like that that</v>

01:35:37.760 --> 01:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kept some of this stuff sort of it was there, but it</v>

01:35:41.920 --> 01:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was understood and society functioned on top of it instead of causing</v>

01:35:46.400 --> 01:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that abrasiveness, that friction in daily life.</v>

01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, one standard deviation is not going to fundamentally make you</v>

01:35:54.080 --> 01:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>alien or unincomprehensible to other people.</v>

01:35:57.920 --> 01:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:35:59.520 --> 01:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>live your life in the way that you're supposed to.</v>

01:36:01.840 --> 01:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Get along with the people around you.</v>

01:36:03.600 --> 01:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy some things they don't or understand some things they</v>

01:36:06.400 --> 01:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>don't, so be it.</v>

01:36:07.600 --> 01:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to separate you from them in any truly meaningful</v>

01:36:12.720 --> 01:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>way. And have some grace for your family members we all should.</v>

01:36:16.880 --> 01:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>They definitely have to have grace for you, right?</v>

01:36:19.120 --> 01:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be some things you do that probably annoy them,</v>

01:36:21.760 --> 01:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so return the favor and overlook some of their foibles as they</v>

01:36:25.840 --> 01:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>overlook yours.</v>

01:36:43.120 --> 01:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I will go ahead and answer this one.</v>

01:36:45.200 --> 01:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I've answered it previously, but it's worth addressing again.</v>

01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully no one has corrected me on the numbering in chat, so</v>

01:36:53.440 --> 01:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>either I have been numbering them correctly.</v>

01:36:56.160 --> 01:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought that I might have missed one, but I don't think</v>

01:36:58.080 --> 01:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that I did.</v>

01:36:58.880 --> 01:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Or no one has felt like telling me I missed one or</v>

01:37:02.080 --> 01:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>no one else is keeping track.</v>

01:37:03.200 --> 01:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.</v>

01:37:03.840 --> 01:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I will answer this one, like I said, because it comes up</v>

01:37:09.360 --> 01:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time and it's worth answering it a few times so</v>

01:37:11.680 --> 01:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>people can find it more easily.</v>

01:37:13.920 --> 01:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Was Moses' wife a Hamite?</v>

01:37:16.320 --> 01:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So was she a daughter of Noah's wicked son Ham?</v>

01:37:22.480 --> 01:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>The answer to this one is that right we have the narrative</v>

01:37:26.640 --> 01:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of Miriam and Aaron who are arguing against Moses in the desert</v>

01:37:31.600 --> 01:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and they bring up his wife and you know argue about that,</v>

01:37:36.080 --> 01:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right? Because he married a Cushite woman.</v>

01:37:38.720 --> 01:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Well the problem here is that Cush, or if you use Ethiopia,</v>

01:37:44.240 --> 01:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Ethiopian in the Greek, both of those terms aren't univocal.</v>

01:37:50.160 --> 01:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>They mean a number of different things at a number of different</v>

01:37:54.160 --> 01:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>times, and we can't say for absolute certainty what it means here.</v>

01:37:58.480 --> 01:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>It could mean a region, in which case, she was probably a</v>

01:38:02.640 --> 01:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Shemite, a cousin.</v>

01:38:04.560 --> 01:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's probably the wife he had before.</v>

01:38:07.920 --> 01:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Or could she have possibly been from the area that had the</v>

01:38:12.960 --> 01:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sons and daughters of Ham?</v>

01:38:14.560 --> 01:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure, there is a possibility of that, I won't deny that that</v>

01:38:17.760 --> 01:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is possible.</v>

01:38:19.040 --> 01:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>However, Scripture does not give us enough information to conclude that the</v>

01:38:24.240 --> 01:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>woman in that narrative, his wife, is another wife.</v>

01:38:28.480 --> 01:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't have an explicit statement that he took another wife, that</v>

01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he married a second wife, or that his first one died, and</v>

01:38:34.720 --> 01:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a new one.</v>

01:38:36.480 --> 01:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>All we have is this term that could be narrow or very</v>

01:38:41.120 --> 01:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>encompassing because it used to kind of mean like the people over</v>

01:38:44.240 --> 01:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that way.</v>

01:38:45.200 --> 01:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So if it means that, it covers his first wife.</v>

01:38:48.960 --> 01:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know from what scripture says if he took an</v>

01:38:51.680 --> 01:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>additional wife.</v>

01:38:52.880 --> 01:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Given that we don't know that, it would be wrong simply to</v>

01:38:56.320 --> 01:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>assume it.</v>

01:38:57.440 --> 01:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So I say that the most reasonable assumption is that it is</v>

01:39:00.960 --> 01:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that generic or broad geographic sense applying to his first wife.</v>

01:39:06.400 --> 01:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Now It's important here to mention, you know, the curse, the leprosy,</v>

01:39:11.360 --> 01:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and why it plays out in the way that</v>

01:39:13.440 --> 01:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it does, because people try to use this to argue for interracial</v>

01:39:17.440 --> 01:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>marriage, or at least to argue against laws against interracial marriage.</v>

01:39:22.240 --> 01:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not what's in view in the narrative.</v>

01:39:24.560 --> 01:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I encourage all of you to go read the narrative after this.</v>

01:39:26.960 --> 01:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I will skip doing it here, but I encourage you all to</v>

01:39:29.920 --> 01:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>read it.</v>

01:39:31.760 --> 01:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Why does God curse the woman who objects?</v>

01:39:36.320 --> 01:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Well what does God say?</v>

01:39:38.160 --> 01:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Moses is God's chosen.</v>

01:39:42.320 --> 01:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He speaks with Moses face to face.</v>

01:39:45.360 --> 01:39:49.280
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't contact him in dreams or visions or the usual things</v>

01:39:49.280 --> 01:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that he uses for prophets.</v>

01:39:50.960 --> 01:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>He speaks to him face to face.</v>

01:39:52.720 --> 01:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Moses is chosen in a particular way above and beyond basically any</v>

01:39:57.200 --> 01:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>other prophet.</v>

01:39:59.040 --> 01:40:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And then Miriam and Aaron are trying to usurp his office.</v>

01:40:03.760 --> 01:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They are insulting God by insulting his chosen prophet.</v>

01:40:08.160 --> 01:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Miriam is cursed because what she does is against God.</v>

01:40:13.520 --> 01:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not because she is speaking against Moses' wife or anything like</v>

01:40:17.600 --> 01:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that. It is because what she is attempting to do is usurp</v>

01:40:21.600 --> 01:40:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that office and question the authority that God has given to Moses,</v>

01:40:25.280 --> 01:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which again is an insult to God.</v>

01:40:28.080 --> 01:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They're punished for insulting God.</v>

01:40:30.400 --> 01:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It falls on her because he's the priest, and to curse the</v>

01:40:33.040 --> 01:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>priest is a whole different thing.</v>

01:40:35.520 --> 01:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>But it is that usurpation, it is that insult to God, that</v>

01:40:40.400 --> 01:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is what is in view in the narrative there.</v>

01:40:42.640 --> 01:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It is not a narrative from which you draw out rules about</v>

01:40:45.600 --> 01:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>marriage, right?</v>

01:40:46.640 --> 01:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Standard interpretive rule, you use passages that actually That actually address the</v>

01:40:51.280 --> 01:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>subject instead of passages that tangentially maybe involve the subject, which is</v>

01:40:57.040 --> 01:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>probably not even in view here.</v>

01:40:58.720 --> 01:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So did Moses marry a Hammite?</v>

01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:05.280
<v Speaker 1>The answer is almost certainly no, but scripture does not tell us</v>

01:41:05.280 --> 01:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>explicitly because it doesn't tell us if he had you know it</v>

01:41:10.640 --> 01:41:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if he was a widow.</v>

01:41:12.240 --> 01:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>If the first wife died, scripture doesn't tell us.</v>

01:41:14.720 --> 01:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>If he married a second, scripture doesn't tell us.</v>

01:41:17.280 --> 01:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>All we know is this term that is equivocal is used of</v>

01:41:21.840 --> 01:41:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this wife in a mercenary way to attack Moses that is an</v>

01:41:25.760 --> 01:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>insult to God.</v>

01:41:27.120 --> 01:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's not an argument for the people who want to say</v>

01:41:30.160 --> 01:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>interracial marriage is fine.</v>

01:41:31.600 --> 01:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not an argument for those of us who want to say</v>

01:41:33.840 --> 01:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that it shouldn't be permitted.</v>

01:41:35.440 --> 01:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not an argument either way on that topic.</v>

01:41:43.360 --> 01:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of the questions that have come in are going to take</v>

01:41:46.080 --> 01:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>me longer to address, so I will definitely be saving those for</v>

01:41:49.120 --> 01:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>next week, or a future week at least.</v>

01:41:59.200 --> 01:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see.</v>

01:42:00.480 --> 01:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe answer one or two more questions this week, I think.</v>

01:42:03.440 --> 01:42:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to see what's</v>

01:42:07.600 --> 01:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>well I can certainly</v>

01:42:10.400 --> 01:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>This one spells my name my last name incorrectly, but I'll still</v>

01:42:13.440 --> 01:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>answer it, so</v>

01:42:20.320 --> 01:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Question 15.</v>

01:42:22.560 --> 01:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe angels still work on the earth today?</v>

01:42:26.720 --> 01:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes.</v>

01:42:28.160 --> 01:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that angels are still active.</v>

01:42:30.720 --> 01:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Demons are still active too, demons being fallen angels, of course.</v>

01:42:33.520 --> 01:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably mean the good ones in this question.</v>

01:42:36.320 --> 01:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, angels are God's agents on earth, they do his bidding, and</v>

01:42:41.440 --> 01:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>part of what they do is protect believers, right?</v>

01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael is the archangel of the church.</v>

01:42:46.880 --> 01:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Incidentally,</v>

01:42:49.200 --> 01:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that means that Satan is now the archangel of the nation of</v>

01:42:53.520 --> 01:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Israel. So maybe I'll get into that in the future.</v>

01:42:56.480 --> 01:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But yes, angels are still very much active.</v>

01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>They are, and there are more of them than of the demons,</v>

01:43:02.080 --> 01:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>thankfully. But it is worth mentioning God does not give us a</v>

01:43:08.160 --> 01:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>great deal of information about what exactly angels and demons are or</v>

01:43:13.040 --> 01:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are not permitted to do, right?</v>

01:43:14.560 --> 01:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a rule book for them.</v>

01:43:16.560 --> 01:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't go trying to investigate or create your own.</v>

01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>God has not given us that knowledge.</v>

01:43:22.080 --> 01:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to find it.</v>

01:43:24.480 --> 01:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Particularly not by talking to demons, right?</v>

01:43:27.120 --> 01:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes Roman Catholic exorcists think that they can talk to demons and</v>

01:43:30.880 --> 01:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>get the rules for how they interact.</v>

01:43:33.440 --> 01:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Not a wise thing to do.</v>

01:43:35.520 --> 01:43:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Right? The father of lies and his minions probably not going to</v>

01:43:38.720 --> 01:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth, at least not in a way that's going</v>

01:43:41.200 --> 01:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to be helpful.</v>

01:44:01.360 --> 01:44:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I see the question about interest in economics.</v>

01:44:04.320 --> 01:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make the last question for this particular stream</v>

01:44:07.200 --> 01:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a question on usury.</v>

01:44:09.120 --> 01:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempted to, but I think I will forego that</v>

01:44:36.880 --> 01:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think well I'll end on a related question to Yusuri, I</v>

01:44:40.480 --> 01:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>suppose. Are the Jews cursed from birth with a hardened heart?</v>

01:44:45.200 --> 01:44:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak on heart hardening or point me to some content</v>

01:44:49.280 --> 01:44:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you made on the subject?</v>

01:44:50.720 --> 01:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it like Pharaoh where he sins then his heart is hardened?</v>

01:44:56.160 --> 01:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And so And so</v>

01:44:58.560 --> 01:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this is question sixteen.</v>

01:45:02.240 --> 01:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Should I set that to start?</v>

01:45:08.160 --> 01:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And so a hardened heart and a seared conscience, right, are very</v>

01:45:12.080 --> 01:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>much related things in scripture.</v>

01:45:14.400 --> 01:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And it is worth pointing out, as he said here, and I've</v>

01:45:17.680 --> 01:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>pointed out elsewhere a number of times, right?</v>

01:45:19.840 --> 01:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Pharaoh hardens his heart first, God confirms him in his choice.</v>

01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So for those who try to use Pharaoh as an example of,</v>

01:45:27.360 --> 01:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>say, double predestination or something, if you read the actual narrative, it</v>

01:45:31.120 --> 01:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't support that conclusion.</v>

01:45:32.800 --> 01:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Because God didn't just predestine Pharaoh to have a hardened heart and</v>

01:45:36.400 --> 01:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be damned.</v>

01:45:38.080 --> 01:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>God does not desire that any should not be saved, right?</v>

01:45:41.120 --> 01:45:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Scripture is abundantly clear.</v>

01:45:42.240 --> 01:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It explicitly says God desires that all should come to repentance and</v>

01:45:45.520 --> 01:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be saved.</v>

01:45:46.320 --> 01:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>God's not lying when he says that.</v>

01:45:48.080 --> 01:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not making it up, he's not being facetious or whatever.</v>

01:45:53.040 --> 01:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>He legitimately means he wants all men to be saved, but you</v>

01:45:56.240 --> 01:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have the option to reject the free offer of salvation.</v>

01:45:59.840 --> 01:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You are well within your power, within your free will, to elect</v>

01:46:04.320 --> 01:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to be damned.</v>

01:46:05.600 --> 01:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:46:09.440 --> 01:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, are the Jews hardened from birth?</v>

01:46:14.400 --> 01:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There is an aspect of that where the answer is yes, because</v>

01:46:18.800 --> 01:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there are genetic components to this, right?</v>

01:46:21.520 --> 01:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Election in view of headship.</v>

01:46:23.200 --> 01:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>See the episode of Stone Choir.</v>

01:46:25.200 --> 01:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We went over this at some length.</v>

01:46:26.320 --> 01:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I will actually make a note to myself to</v>

01:46:30.160 --> 01:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and add that into these show notes.</v>

01:46:32.640 --> 01:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:46:33.840 --> 01:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sort of genetic proclivity to certain sins, that</v>

01:46:38.080 --> 01:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is very much a thing.</v>

01:46:39.200 --> 01:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And for some people it is going to be more difficult to</v>

01:46:41.520 --> 01:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>overcome that</v>

01:46:43.120 --> 01:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and to believe in Christ, to believe in the gospel, because they</v>

01:46:46.800 --> 01:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have that genetic proclivity to reject it.</v>

01:46:50.800 --> 01:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Now layered on top of that, and in this case, probably even</v>

01:46:54.880 --> 01:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>stronger than that just genetic proclivity to be you know quarrelsome and</v>

01:46:59.680 --> 01:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>all the other things, right?</v>

01:47:02.160 --> 01:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>The average Jew is taught from birth that everyone is not Jewish</v>

01:47:07.440 --> 01:47:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is out to get them.</v>

01:47:09.280 --> 01:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>They're taught to be paranoid.</v>

01:47:11.040 --> 01:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They are taught that they are special.</v>

01:47:13.200 --> 01:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>They are God's chosen people.</v>

01:47:14.960 --> 01:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else is not even fully human.</v>

01:47:17.520 --> 01:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They are allowed to exploit the Goyim however they want, and so</v>

01:47:21.840 --> 01:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth, and it just compounds their entire life.</v>

01:47:27.040 --> 01:47:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And so trying to convert a Jewish adult, you are You are</v>

01:47:32.800 --> 01:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>working against decades of the most pernicious and thorough indoctrination that probably</v>

01:47:39.200 --> 01:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>exists on the face of the planet, outside maybe some extremely efficient</v>

01:47:44.080 --> 01:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>cults, perhaps.</v>

01:47:45.440 --> 01:47:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:47:47.280 --> 01:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That has so seared and hardened their hearts, seared their consciences, hardened</v>

01:47:52.320 --> 01:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>their hearts, that you will probably find it impossible to overcome that.</v>

01:47:55.840 --> 01:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why basically no Jew ever converts.</v>

01:47:58.640 --> 01:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>There are those who will claim they converted, and then you will</v>

01:48:01.520 --> 01:48:05.760
<v Speaker 1>notice, given the opportunity, they will immediately stab you in the back.</v>

01:48:05.760 --> 01:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Because it wasn't a real conversion.</v>

01:48:07.360 --> 01:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They're conversos, it was mercenary.</v>

01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>That is a problem that Christendom has had for centuries, and people</v>

01:48:14.160 --> 01:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have to keep learning this lesson, because apparently we can't just learn</v>

01:48:17.360 --> 01:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the lessons of our forefathers the easy way, by reading about them,</v>

01:48:20.640 --> 01:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of making the same mistake, and learning it the hard way</v>

01:48:23.840 --> 01:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>again. Does that mean no Jew can ever be converted?</v>

01:48:27.920 --> 01:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>No, of course not.</v>

01:48:28.800 --> 01:48:30.240
<v Speaker 1>God can work miracles.</v>

01:48:30.240 --> 01:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything's a miracle.</v>

01:48:31.360 --> 01:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>God is able to do that.</v>

01:48:33.120 --> 01:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, God works through the natural means he has</v>

01:48:37.600 --> 01:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>instituted, in this sense I mean the sacraments, right?</v>

01:48:40.640 --> 01:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>They are also supernatural, but they are natural in an essence in</v>

01:48:44.320 --> 01:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a way, because God is working through his word and water, spoken</v>

01:48:48.480 --> 01:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>word, water.</v>

01:48:49.200 --> 01:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>water. He's working through wine and bread and the Word.</v>

01:48:53.200 --> 01:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>God works through means to bring people to saving faith.</v>

01:48:56.960 --> 01:49:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He does not zap you with lightning and give you belief.</v>

01:49:00.240 --> 01:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Right? That's not how it works.</v>

01:49:01.600 --> 01:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not enthusiasts, we're not crazy.</v>

01:49:04.560 --> 01:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, can a Jew read God's Word, read the New Testament, or</v>

01:49:09.120 --> 01:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>even the Old Testament, if God opens his heart, right, softens his</v>

01:49:13.120 --> 01:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>heart, unsears his conscience?</v>

01:49:15.600 --> 01:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But yes, it's going to take that miracle to do it.</v>

01:49:18.560 --> 01:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, if you look back through the pages, the</v>

01:49:22.880 --> 01:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>annals of Christendom and try to find Jews who have legitimately converted,</v>

01:49:26.640 --> 01:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you will find a handful, but you will be able to count</v>

01:49:29.600 --> 01:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>them on one or two hands, and you will have fingers left</v>

01:49:33.680 --> 01:49:40.080
<v Speaker 1>over. So is their conscience seared from birth due to genetics?</v>

01:49:40.080 --> 01:49:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Not seared in the sense of making them unable to believe, their</v>

01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>heart isn't hardened in the sense they can't come to faith, but</v>

01:49:46.640 --> 01:49:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to take into account that it's not just being born</v>

01:49:50.320 --> 01:49:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with genetic proclivities, it's being born into a system that will then</v>

01:49:54.320 --> 01:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>indoctrinate</v>

01:49:55.760 --> 01:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you for twenty years.</v>

01:49:57.920 --> 01:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Or more.</v>

01:49:58.640 --> 01:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Your entire life you're going to get that sort of indoctrination if</v>

01:50:01.680 --> 01:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you stay in the little Jewish bubble, right?</v>

01:50:04.480 --> 01:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reality of it.</v>

01:50:06.400 --> 01:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, purely hypothetical, right?</v>

01:50:08.720 --> 01:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You take a Jewish infant, raise him in a Christian family where</v>

01:50:13.360 --> 01:50:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there is zero Jewish influence whatsoever, would he still revert to default</v>

01:50:19.760 --> 01:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>settings as it were?</v>

01:50:21.040 --> 01:50:24.320
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that potentially you would have a Christian in that</v>

01:50:24.320 --> 01:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>case. We're not exactly going to run that social experiment, right?</v>

01:50:28.720 --> 01:50:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is suggesting that we do that.</v>

01:50:30.800 --> 01:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone's suggesting it would be wise.</v>

01:50:32.560 --> 01:50:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And also, you can't do it because because there's still the access</v>

01:50:36.800 --> 01:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Jewish influence.</v>

01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:42.240
<v Speaker 1>In the hypothetical, you would have to have such control over conditions</v>

01:50:42.400 --> 01:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that there would be no way for him ever to learn that</v>

01:50:44.880 --> 01:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he was genetically Jewish or what that even meant.</v>

01:50:48.400 --> 01:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So the reality is, is it purely genetic?</v>

01:50:53.040 --> 01:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>No. But is it such that their conscience is seared and their</v>

01:50:56.560 --> 01:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>heart is hardened?</v>

01:50:57.680 --> 01:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes. And that is why basically no Jew ever actually converts to</v>

01:51:01.360 --> 01:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Christianity. Which is a tragedy.</v>

01:51:04.720 --> 01:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an evil and it is a tragedy, but it is</v>

01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>one that they have brought on themselves through centuries of wickedness.</v>

01:51:18.720 --> 01:51:23.280
<v Speaker 1>On that happy note, I think that I will call the stream</v>

01:51:23.280 --> 01:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for this week because we have definitely run a little bit over</v>

01:51:27.280 --> 01:51:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on time.</v>

01:51:27.760 --> 01:51:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind doing that sometimes.</v>

01:51:28.800 --> 01:51:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It's perfectly reasonable.</v>

01:51:30.880 --> 01:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:51:32.160 --> 01:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be all.</v>

01:51:33.840 --> 01:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for those who contributed questions.</v>

01:51:36.320 --> 01:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And of course the questions in the chat, I have them up</v>

01:51:39.520 --> 01:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>here on my</v>

01:51:41.680 --> 01:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>iPad, so I will be triaging those as it were after the</v>

01:51:45.360 --> 01:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>stream. I'll be adding them to my future list going forward.</v>

01:51:49.840 --> 01:51:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That seems to have worked as intended, so if it did not,</v>

01:51:54.240 --> 01:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>which is to say if you do not see your question in</v>

01:51:57.120 --> 01:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the future questions</v>

01:52:00.240 --> 01:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>topic on the forum, or answered in this stream, of course, then</v>

01:52:04.880 --> 01:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>by all means please submit it again so that I can see</v>

01:52:07.840 --> 01:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it and please tell me it did not get picked up so</v>

01:52:10.320 --> 01:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I can figure out why that happened.</v>

01:52:12.240 --> 01:52:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it missed any, but there's always the possibility.</v>

01:52:15.760 --> 01:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Which raises the topic of how do you submit questions.</v>

01:52:19.600 --> 01:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Well one you can submit in the stream of course as I've</v>

01:52:22.400 --> 01:52:25.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned. I am looking at those and it's being pulled out by</v>

01:52:25.760 --> 01:52:29.280
<v Speaker 1>my AI agent in the background so hopefully it got all those.</v>

01:52:29.280 --> 01:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The preferred way of course is on the forum.</v>

01:52:32.160 --> 01:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The first questions I went through in this stream and the first</v>

01:52:34.640 --> 01:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>questions I will do in every stream will be those from the</v>

01:52:37.520 --> 01:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>forum. I give them priority because those questions are the best way</v>

01:52:42.400 --> 01:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for me to organize things because I can link to them in</v>

01:52:45.040 --> 01:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the episode and then people can read the question in the future.</v>

01:52:48.160 --> 01:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to pull out the text and make sure I</v>

01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't lose it and all that stuff.</v>

01:52:51.360 --> 01:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just the cleanest way to do it.</v>

01:52:52.960 --> 01:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the best way to do it.</v>

01:52:54.160 --> 01:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It helps me keep things organized.</v>

01:52:55.680 --> 01:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It keeps a database going forward for people to look at the</v>

01:52:58.560 --> 01:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>questions and see how I've answered them, which is part of the</v>

01:53:01.440 --> 01:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>point of doing the QA stream.</v>

01:53:03.760 --> 01:53:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That being said, submitting them in the stream is fine in the</v>

01:53:06.800 --> 01:53:10.240
<v Speaker 1>chat, submitting them on X, which shows up in the chat is</v>

01:53:10.240 --> 01:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>fine, telegram, whatever it happens to be.</v>

01:53:13.040 --> 01:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're a friend of a friend, by all means</v>

01:53:15.680 --> 01:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>send it that way.</v>

01:53:16.480 --> 01:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Write me a letter, whatever you want.</v>

01:53:18.480 --> 01:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I try to get to all of those questions.</v>

01:53:20.960 --> 01:53:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That being said, if I do not see your question, if it</v>

01:53:24.800 --> 01:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is disappeared from my view because whatever platform you're using decides I</v>

01:53:28.880 --> 01:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>don't need to see it, that does happen, particularly on X.</v>

01:53:32.080 --> 01:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>If that kind of stuff happens, by all means, please submit it</v>

01:53:35.040 --> 01:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>again. I didn't just ignore your question.</v>

01:53:37.200 --> 01:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I probably literally didn't see it.</v>

01:53:39.040 --> 01:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>As I've mentioned a number of times, my DMs on X are</v>

01:53:42.560 --> 01:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not a good way to do this anymore because my DMs on</v>

01:53:46.160 --> 01:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>X don't really work anymore.</v>

01:53:47.600 --> 01:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I open them, they scroll, the scrolling freezes, half the time they</v>

01:53:51.040 --> 01:53:53.840
<v Speaker 1>crash, it locks me out sometimes.</v>

01:53:54.080 --> 01:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>They're basically useless to me now.</v>

01:53:56.080 --> 01:53:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So please use one of the other methods.</v>

01:53:58.320 --> 01:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, again, thank you for those who submitted questions,</v>

01:54:00.960 --> 01:54:02.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you for participating in the chat.</v>

01:54:03.040 --> 01:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It is always good to get the chance to do this.</v>

01:54:05.520 --> 01:54:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And I try to do this on Thursdays, but really it usually</v>

01:54:08.800 --> 01:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>winds up being Friday.</v>

01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I pick Thursday because it depends how my week goes.</v>

01:54:12.720 --> 01:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>If it goes, I guess well and I have Thursday open, I</v>

01:54:15.920 --> 01:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>do it Thursday if not winds up being Friday.</v>

01:54:18.560 --> 01:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So it being Friday evening, I hope you all maybe those on</v>

01:54:22.400 --> 01:54:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast don't go out now, it depends.</v>

01:54:24.240 --> 01:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you're in your twenties it's nice to go out</v>

01:54:26.320 --> 01:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>now, but have a good weekend.</v>

01:54:28.640 --> 01:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Go out and do something in God's creation.</v>

01:54:30.400 --> 01:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's finally cooling off here.</v>

01:54:31.600 --> 01:54:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's why I have my window open for the first time since</v>

01:54:34.240 --> 01:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>summer began.</v>

01:54:35.520 --> 01:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So go out and enjoy God's creation.</v>

01:54:37.200 --> 01:54:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Always good out good to do a hike or something on the</v>

01:54:39.760 --> 01:54:44.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend. Just enjoy the cooler temperatures and the creation that God made</v>

01:54:44.720 --> 01:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for our enjoyment.</v>

01:54:45.680 --> 01:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not just for his glory, it is also for our enjoyment</v>

01:54:48.960 --> 01:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as his avatar, as his idol, as his symbol, his</v>

01:54:53.920 --> 01:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>spokespeople, basically, his head of creation.</v>

01:54:58.240 --> 01:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So go out, enjoy that.</v>

01:54:59.920 --> 01:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend.</v>

01:55:00.960 --> 01:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Go to church on Sunday and I will see you all next</v>

01:55:04.800 --> 01:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>week. Until then, God bless God bless</v>

01:55:16.800 --> 01:55:17.120
you

01:55:18.720 --> 01:55:19.680
you.

02:00:10.880 --> 02:00:11.280
no, no,

02:00:11.360 --> 02:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>dump.</v>

02:00:53.200 --> 02:00:54.720
Okay.