WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It is the 15th of May 2026.</v>

00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I am Corey J.</v>

00:00:04.320 --> 00:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Mahler, and this is at any cost.</v>

00:00:06.880 --> 00:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>This is episode 28, a QA episode, and I do not believe</v>

00:00:12.080 --> 00:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that I have any housekeeping, so I will simply get into the</v>

00:00:17.200 --> 00:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>questions here.</v>

00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>As soon as I Open up my list here.</v>

00:00:26.400 --> 00:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Question one.</v>

00:00:27.840 --> 00:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>What is your opinion on the arrest of Chud the Builder?</v>

00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I pulled this one out because it is relevant.</v>

00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of an ongoing thing right now.</v>

00:00:37.280 --> 00:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I would start off by saying I don't always answer questions like</v>

00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this because a lot of times these things are sort of in</v>

00:00:44.720 --> 00:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>flux and I may not know a particularly great amount about them.</v>

00:00:48.560 --> 00:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>For instance, I was unaware of this man before Recent events and</v>

00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>people tagging me and asking me questions.</v>

00:00:55.440 --> 00:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Partly because he's in Tennessee and I'm in Tennessee and I'm an</v>

00:00:58.480 --> 00:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>attorney, and he obviously needs an attorney, an attorney.</v>

00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But as I've already said, on X, I do not have a</v>

00:01:06.320 --> 00:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee bar card.</v>

00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And yes, there is Pro Hoc Vice, which basically just means specifically</v>

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for this given matter.</v>

00:01:13.680 --> 00:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So a court can admit an attorney to practice before the court,</v>

00:01:18.080 --> 00:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even though the attorney does not have the bar card necessary, whatever</v>

00:01:22.320 --> 00:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be, to practice in that court.</v>

00:01:25.520 --> 00:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's usually exceptional and there's usually has to be a compelling reason</v>

00:01:29.760 --> 00:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for it.</v>

00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no compelling reason to the mind of a court to admit</v>

00:01:35.520 --> 00:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a California attorney in a Tennessee court for a criminal matter.</v>

00:01:40.960 --> 00:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Because there are many attorneys who practice criminal law.</v>

00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And so no court is going to admit me pro-Hoc Vice, particularly</v>

00:01:50.080 --> 00:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because I have not practiced criminal law.</v>

00:01:52.720 --> 00:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And so all of the things they would use, all the warrants</v>

00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be in favor of that admission are against me.</v>

00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So I c someone asked on X and also in the chat,</v>

00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>can I offer legal advice?</v>

00:02:07.360 --> 00:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I can offer legal advice.</v>

00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not officially legal advice because I'm not a Tennessee attorney, so</v>

00:02:13.600 --> 00:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it would just be generalized advice.</v>

00:02:16.640 --> 00:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, attorneys can consult.</v>

00:02:18.480 --> 00:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That's something that you can do as an attorney without without necessarily</v>

00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>being admitted in the state in which the action is taking place.</v>

00:02:26.720 --> 00:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But to get to the question proper, I've pointed out it's not</v>

00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of behavior in which I engage and I was already</v>

00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fairly clear about that on X what I meant by saying that.</v>

00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>As you may have noticed, I don't use expletives.</v>

00:02:41.120 --> 00:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't engage in that sort of shocking behavior.</v>

00:02:44.240 --> 00:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't do that sort of stuff.</v>

00:02:46.800 --> 00:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily condemn it in all situations.</v>

00:02:50.640 --> 00:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't.</v>

00:02:51.120 --> 00:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll be explicit, I do not condemn it in all situations.</v>

00:02:54.160 --> 00:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And I have to give the caveat of all situations because if</v>

00:02:59.200 --> 00:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it in church That's inappropriate, right?</v>

00:03:03.600 --> 00:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The behavior in which he is engaging, if you ran into a</v>

00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>black church and did that, I would object to that.</v>

00:03:09.920 --> 00:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Because that's a totally different thing.</v>

00:03:12.160 --> 00:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That's inappropriate.</v>

00:03:13.200 --> 00:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that.</v>

00:03:14.640 --> 00:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Even though, yes, there are plenty of problems with black churches, many</v>

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of them teach horrible theology.</v>

00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Still, time and place, matter of wisdom, don't do that.</v>

00:03:24.320 --> 00:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Now is one Is what he's doing necessarily wise?</v>

00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>No, from what I've seen it may not be wise.</v>

00:03:30.960 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that it's not something that needs to be</v>

00:03:33.520 --> 00:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>done, right?</v>

00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a certain change in mindset and sort of the contours of</v>

00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>how freedom of speech and related matters are enforced or not enforced</v>

00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US context.</v>

00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And he's pushing the envelope in what appears to be a useful</v>

00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>way. Preliminary comment, like I said, I know not that much about</v>

00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>him. I just did a little bit of research before I hit</v>

00:03:56.880 --> 00:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>start streaming.</v>

00:03:58.320 --> 00:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that he should have been arrested necessarily because from</v>

00:04:06.320 --> 00:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what I can see of the information that is already public from</v>

00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what I can actually access, it looks like it was indeed self-defense.</v>

00:04:17.520 --> 00:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Did he engage in provocative behavior?</v>

00:04:20.480 --> 00:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes. But are you allowed to do that legally?</v>

00:04:23.040 --> 00:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes you are.</v>

00:04:25.200 --> 00:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>There are certain lines you cannot cross, right?</v>

00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't stalk someone.</v>

00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a crime.</v>

00:04:30.960 --> 00:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed to stalk people people.</v>

00:04:32.880 --> 00:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't, you know, follow people for blocks is an inappropriate thing.</v>

00:04:36.880 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't go out and do that.</v>

00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But generally speaking, you do have a right to free speech, including</v>

00:04:43.440 --> 00:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in public, as long as you don't cross certain boundaries, basically as</v>

00:04:47.440 --> 00:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not making threats, right?</v>

00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And the threats have to be of a certain kind because there's</v>

00:04:52.640 --> 00:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole area of the law concerned with that, and I</v>

00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get into that right now, but there are there</v>

00:04:57.360 --> 00:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are elements you have to hit in order to actually have it</v>

00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be a credible threat that is actionable and not free speech, right?</v>

00:05:03.440 --> 00:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:05:04.640 --> 00:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>there are lines there, there's some gray area.</v>

00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Just be careful with that stuff.</v>

00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You can look up the test online.</v>

00:05:10.400 --> 00:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's fairly simple, fairly easy to understand, as a test like that</v>

00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>should be.</v>

00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't seem to me like his behavior crossed those lines.</v>

00:05:19.920 --> 00:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It does seem to me like the other gentleman will call him</v>

00:05:23.760 --> 00:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>engaged in threatening behavior, and then indeed assaulted him, in the criminal</v>

00:05:28.080 --> 00:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sense of the term, incidentally also I believe in the civil sense.</v>

00:05:32.560 --> 00:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a difference between salt assault and battery in civil courts.</v>

00:05:35.760 --> 00:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Assault is putting someone in imminent apprehension of undue or unwanted contact.</v>

00:05:41.040 --> 00:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I pretend I'm going to punch you, that could be</v>

00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>assault in a civil context.</v>

00:05:45.760 --> 00:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Battery is when I actually hit you.</v>

00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Incidentally, if I hit you in the back, it's battery and not</v>

00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>assault because you didn't see it coming.</v>

00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>In the criminal sense, we usually mean by assault actually physical contact,</v>

00:05:57.280 --> 00:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right? We mean actually hitting another person, doing something actually physical, not</v>

00:06:01.760 --> 00:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just words.</v>

00:06:02.800 --> 00:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And so it looks like the other gentleman engaged in that behavior,</v>

00:06:07.600 --> 00:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it would be warranted self-defense.</v>

00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>That is my initial assessment of it.</v>

00:06:12.080 --> 00:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's reasonable.</v>

00:06:13.680 --> 00:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And so does he pose the sort of imminent threat or ongoing</v>

00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>threat where he should be incarcerated in order to prevent him from</v>

00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>causing additional harm while this matter is being adjudicated?</v>

00:06:26.640 --> 00:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so.</v>

00:06:27.520 --> 00:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's being done because it's a white man and the other man</v>

00:06:30.640 --> 00:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was black.</v>

00:06:31.360 --> 00:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole reason.</v>

00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:06:34.960 --> 00:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as a practical matter that's related to this, in cases where you</v>

00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have given current conditions, right?</v>

00:06:42.640 --> 00:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>In cases where you have one of our guys, who's white, who's</v>

00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly being persecuted on account of his race, or is at least</v>

00:06:49.840 --> 00:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>being singled out for different treatment on account of his race, you</v>

00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>support that guy.</v>

00:06:55.200 --> 00:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Period. Because it is a strategic matter, not just a you know</v>

00:07:01.760 --> 00:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>moral objective matter.</v>

00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a different thing.</v>

00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And yes, as someone said in the chat, we have it's not</v>

00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even just a two tier system, it's a multi tier system.</v>

00:07:10.560 --> 00:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of it's not really the oppression Olympics as it has</v>

00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>been called sometimes, because there are very much privileged groups and the</v>

00:07:19.440 --> 00:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>term privilege gets abused a lot, but it has utility as well.</v>

00:07:22.640 --> 00:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a very real thing.</v>

00:07:24.320 --> 00:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There are privileged groups with regard to treatment by our legal system,</v>

00:07:28.640 --> 00:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and there are groups that are not privileged.</v>

00:07:31.120 --> 00:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you're a white male, particularly a white male Christian, and</v>

00:07:34.640 --> 00:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he does appear to be a Christian, then</v>

00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you are basically devoid of any privilege.</v>

00:07:40.800 --> 00:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You are going to get the book thrown at you, to use</v>

00:07:43.440 --> 00:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the old saying.</v>

00:07:44.960 --> 00:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So you support your guy, you support our guy because he is</v>

00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>one of us.</v>

00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And could he have done something?</v>

00:07:53.200 --> 00:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Not in this case, but you know, hypothetically, even if he did</v>

00:07:56.640 --> 00:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>something that was foolish, right, you still support the guy because the</v>

00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>system is persecuting him in a way because of who he is,</v>

00:08:06.080 --> 00:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because of what he is.</v>

00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And so, yes, again, you support our guy.</v>

00:08:12.480 --> 00:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to give a blanket recommendation of that sort of</v>

00:08:16.640 --> 00:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>behavior, but I'm not going to say that it's necessarily wrongful.</v>

00:08:20.080 --> 00:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I said in a post on X, I think it is</v>

00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>something that needs to be done.</v>

00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something that's important given the reality of where we</v>

00:08:27.200 --> 00:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are now.</v>

00:08:27.600 --> 00:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Again, it's that envelope pushing, it's trying to push things in our</v>

00:08:31.520 --> 00:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>direction. It is</v>

00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>beneficial in the long run.</v>

00:08:36.640 --> 00:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And there are guys who are going to do that, and guys</v>

00:08:38.880 --> 00:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like me who are not going to do that.</v>

00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So no.</v>

00:08:42.720 --> 00:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The short answer is I do not believe that he should be</v>

00:08:45.280 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>arrested, and I don't believe in an objective system that was morally</v>

00:08:50.720 --> 00:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>structured following the law and not just you know the letter of</v>

00:08:54.560 --> 00:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the law but also the intent of the law, the spirit of</v>

00:08:57.520 --> 00:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the law, I don't believe he would have been arrested.</v>

00:09:00.080 --> 00:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He would have been sent home and said, you know, don't leave</v>

00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the county.</v>

00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>That's just standard procedure for something like this if you're not incarcerated</v>

00:09:09.280 --> 00:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>pending trial.</v>

00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't leave the county.</v>

00:09:11.600 --> 00:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Stick around.</v>

00:09:12.720 --> 00:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have an investigation, and then we'll determine what happened</v>

00:09:16.800 --> 00:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and whether we charge you or not.</v>

00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how things should go.</v>

00:09:20.800 --> 00:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, optimally, under ideal conditions, this wouldn't happen, right?</v>

00:09:25.120 --> 00:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I've pointed that out on X as well.</v>

00:09:27.680 --> 00:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we shouldn't have Africans in our lands.</v>

00:09:30.880 --> 00:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And so this sort of confrontation shouldn't even be possible.</v>

00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, if we had segregation in terms of actual countries, so they</v>

00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>over in their lands, us in our lands, right?</v>

00:09:43.680 --> 00:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>If we had that, then no, you shouldn't fly over there and</v>

00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>harass them, right?</v>

00:09:48.640 --> 00:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>That would be dumb.</v>

00:09:49.520 --> 00:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We'd condemn that.</v>

00:09:50.880 --> 00:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But they shouldn't be here.</v>

00:09:52.320 --> 00:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the foundational problem.</v>

00:09:54.320 --> 00:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the foundational issue that needs to be resolved.</v>

00:09:57.680 --> 00:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Again, don't go and harass people in church or places like that,</v>

00:10:01.520 --> 00:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but free speech is something that we have.</v>

00:10:03.760 --> 00:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is important within certain bounds.</v>

00:10:06.560 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think free speech should should be unbounded.</v>

00:10:08.720 --> 00:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a libertarian, right?</v>

00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think blasphemy should be illegal and punished.</v>

00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>For instance, that's one one example.</v>

00:10:15.680 --> 00:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But we do have free speech with regard to issues like this,</v>

00:10:18.880 --> 00:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and certain political issues and social issues.</v>

00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That should apply most strongly to us, incidentally, because we're the ones</v>

00:10:26.800 --> 00:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for whom the Constitutional's protections were written, right?</v>

00:10:29.280 --> 00:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's for their progeny, not for these aliens living in our lands.</v>

00:10:34.720 --> 00:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:10:37.280 --> 00:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You do need men to actually challenge these things and fight it</v>

00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>out in the courts.</v>

00:10:42.480 --> 00:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So support him if you're able to, because he's going to need</v>

00:10:46.800 --> 00:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>support. What he's doing is important.</v>

00:10:49.920 --> 00:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, these things have to be challenged in the courts</v>

00:10:53.040 --> 00:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it will go our way and sometimes it will not.</v>

00:10:56.800 --> 00:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That is a matter of legal and political strategy</v>

00:11:00.880 --> 00:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he's not necessarily engaged in that.</v>

00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not picking the optimal place to have this confrontation and then</v>

00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>get it into an optimal venue and then have the appeals path</v>

00:11:11.600 --> 00:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the right panel.</v>

00:11:12.880 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not planning all that stuff.</v>

00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of thing that you need attorneys on your side</v>

00:11:16.800 --> 00:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to be doing.</v>

00:11:17.840 --> 00:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That is something that, for instance, the NRA does.</v>

00:11:20.480 --> 00:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that for a fact, I've talked to a number of</v>

00:11:22.720 --> 00:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>their attorneys, friends with some of them.</v>

00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>That is something they do, right?</v>

00:11:26.160 --> 00:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You pick the place where you want to challenge something because you</v>

00:11:29.040 --> 00:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have the optimal conditions to most likely obtain the outcome that you</v>

00:11:33.680 --> 00:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>desire. I think that this is probably a better venue than many</v>

00:11:38.560 --> 00:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>others because it's in Tennessee.</v>

00:11:40.800 --> 00:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately it is not in the we'll say more staunchly conservative parts</v>

00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of Tennessee, because he's in the Nashville area, which is it's not</v>

00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Memphis, it could be worse, but it's, you know, not Knoxville's a</v>

00:11:55.120 --> 00:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>little better where I am.</v>

00:11:57.440 --> 00:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So yes, the overall I don't think he should have been arrested.</v>

00:12:00.800 --> 00:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He has been.</v>

00:12:01.520 --> 00:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be probably a pretty long fight, and they're probably</v>

00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>going to throw the book at him.</v>

00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It looks like they've already essentially done that, but they will continue</v>

00:12:09.920 --> 00:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to pursue it, so support him if you can.</v>

00:12:12.560 --> 00:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Because he's being persecuted not because of any particular incident, but because</v>

00:12:17.920 --> 00:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the incident gave them the opportunity to charge a white Christian male</v>

00:12:21.920 --> 00:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with a crime and try to make an example of him.</v>

00:12:24.880 --> 00:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what's happening here because we have a legal system that is</v>

00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not a legal system It is not a matter of justice, it's</v>

00:12:32.480 --> 00:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a justice system.</v>

00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of injustice and persecution deliberately aimed at white Christian</v>

00:12:39.040 --> 00:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>males.</v>

00:12:46.560 --> 00:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Question two is sort of shifting gears, although I guess it's still</v>

00:12:50.560 --> 00:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit legal related here.</v>

00:12:55.360 --> 00:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>How should a young Christian man approach the pursuit of marriage when</v>

00:12:58.880 --> 00:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he has developed a strong interest in a godly young woman who</v>

00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is significantly younger?</v>

00:13:03.520 --> 00:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>In this particular case, a twenty-three-year-old man and a fifteen-year-old girl from</v>

00:13:07.520 --> 00:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a conservative Christian family.</v>

00:13:09.360 --> 00:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He's known her for years.</v>

00:13:11.040 --> 00:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>This was a friend passing the question to me to ask to</v>

00:13:15.600 --> 00:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>answer it.</v>

00:13:16.560 --> 00:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Scripture emphasizes the importance of sexual purity and the value of marriage</v>

00:13:20.720 --> 00:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as a safeguard against immorality, in fact scripture gives marriage as the</v>

00:13:24.800 --> 00:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>only cure for sexual temptation.</v>

00:13:28.160 --> 00:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It also shows examples and principles regarding betrothal, parental involvement, and readiness</v>

00:13:33.440 --> 00:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for marriage in patriarchal contexts, for example, the Old Testament narratives and</v>

00:13:38.160 --> 00:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis on the father's role.</v>

00:13:41.840 --> 00:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll comment on that in a second here.</v>

00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Key questions for my personal situation are what does the Bible teach</v>

00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about appropriate age differences for marriage?</v>

00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it advisable to wait for a specific young woman who is</v>

00:13:54.480 --> 00:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not yet of typical marrying age according to our day and age?</v>

00:13:58.000 --> 00:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>At what age do you think it is appropriate for a girl</v>

00:14:00.400 --> 00:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to marry?</v>

00:14:01.040 --> 00:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Or does the command to flee sexual temptation and the practical delay</v>

00:14:05.280 --> 00:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in forming a household council pursuing a similarly godly wife who is</v>

00:14:08.880 --> 00:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>closer in age?</v>

00:14:11.040 --> 00:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>What principles would guide a decision in such a situation, especially in</v>

00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a secular European context, the questioner is German, where biblically minded Christian</v>

00:14:20.720 --> 00:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>women are rare, and I doubt it'll be able to find anyone</v>

00:14:24.080 --> 00:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>else soon.</v>

00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So I would start out by noting something linguistically that many sort</v>

00:14:32.240 --> 00:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of gloss over when reading scripture and other old documents.</v>

00:14:37.520 --> 00:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>When scripture speaks of marriage, and incidentally, like I said, older documents</v>

00:14:42.800 --> 00:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, they speak of two distinct things actually.</v>

00:14:46.320 --> 00:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Because how does Scripture speak of marriage?</v>

00:14:49.120 --> 00:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It says, for instance, when talking about the flood, right?</v>

00:14:52.880 --> 00:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>They were marrying and being given in marriage.</v>

00:14:56.320 --> 00:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Two different things, right?</v>

00:14:58.000 --> 00:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The first is the man.</v>

00:14:59.840 --> 00:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The second is the woman.</v>

00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Well women are given in marriage.</v>

00:15:04.080 --> 00:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's doing the giving, right?</v>

00:15:05.520 --> 00:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone has to you can't have a gift without a giver, right?</v>

00:15:09.280 --> 00:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't have, in this case, a wife being given in marriage</v>

00:15:13.920 --> 00:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>without someone giving her away.</v>

00:15:16.640 --> 00:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason we have the ceremony still in a formal marriage</v>

00:15:20.560 --> 00:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ceremony of the father giving away the bride.</v>

00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Because the father is the one who has the veto.</v>

00:15:27.680 --> 00:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>At the very least, he's supposed to have a veto.</v>

00:15:30.320 --> 00:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He should be involved in determining who gets to marry his daughter.</v>

00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons that an unmarried woman should never be</v>

00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>outside her father's house.</v>

00:15:38.800 --> 00:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Unless of course, you know, her father is dead or a criminal</v>

00:15:41.840 --> 00:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or something heinous, right?</v>

00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Then she is the responsibility of the next closest male relative, who</v>

00:15:48.160 --> 00:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is of appropriate age, right?</v>

00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That's how it goes.</v>

00:15:52.640 --> 00:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So a woman being given in marriage means that yes, you should</v>

00:15:56.320 --> 00:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ask her father for permission to marry her, for him to</v>

00:16:00.960 --> 00:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>give her away to you as a wife.</v>

00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, you have an eight-year gap, right?</v>

00:16:08.080 --> 00:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't care.</v>

00:16:09.120 --> 00:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>An eight-year gap is not a big deal.</v>

00:16:11.760 --> 00:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The only way that an age gap starts to be a real</v>

00:16:15.200 --> 00:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>issue is when you get into like significant age, you know, 25-year</v>

00:16:20.320 --> 00:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>age gap.</v>

00:16:20.880 --> 00:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe don't do that.</v>

00:16:22.800 --> 00:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Partly because as the man, you're gonna die way before your wife</v>

00:16:27.360 --> 00:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're 20 years older than her.</v>

00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Because you're already probably going to die younger, then she will eventually</v>

00:16:32.960 --> 00:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>die. She's going to outlive you.</v>

00:16:35.520 --> 00:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't want your wife necessarily to be a widow.</v>

00:16:39.120 --> 00:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>At least you're not intending, because in this case you're basically intending</v>

00:16:42.640 --> 00:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for her to be a widow for decades.</v>

00:16:45.120 --> 00:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>In this specific hypothetical, that's not the case, right?</v>

00:16:47.920 --> 00:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Eight years is not really a big deal.</v>

00:16:50.720 --> 00:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not saying that you, your friend, in this case, as</v>

00:16:53.760 --> 00:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a twenty-three-year-old, should marry the 15-year-old now.</v>

00:16:57.040 --> 00:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Because as a Western European, and I think the Western Europeans have</v>

00:17:00.560 --> 00:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>been largely right on this, there's a little bit of a difference</v>

00:17:02.480 --> 00:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>with, you know, it's the Hajjnal line.</v>

00:17:04.240 --> 00:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a little difference with Eastern Europe and certainly other parts of</v>

00:17:06.960 --> 00:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the world.</v>

00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>By and large, the marriage age for women in Western Europe has</v>

00:17:12.400 --> 00:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>been around 21.</v>

00:17:13.760 --> 00:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>21, 22, 23.</v>

00:17:15.760 --> 00:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes a little younger, sometimes a little older.</v>

00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But usually that early, that first half of the twenties is about</v>

00:17:23.040 --> 00:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when women get married in Western European context.</v>

00:17:27.040 --> 00:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>In the East, it's been, you know, sixteen, seventeen, 18.</v>

00:17:30.960 --> 00:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that the age of consent's a little younger in some</v>

00:17:33.920 --> 00:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>parts of Germany, for instance, but there is, of course, the inaptly</v>

00:17:38.240 --> 00:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>named in the US context, Romeo and Juliet laws, which are probably</v>

00:17:41.280 --> 00:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Proximity and age laws, right?</v>

00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, that's usually for things that are immoral, not necessarily</v>

00:17:47.520 --> 00:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for marriage.</v>

00:17:48.240 --> 00:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Marriage has different rules, but they're related laws.</v>

00:17:52.480 --> 00:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think the best advice here is just wait three years</v>

00:17:55.600 --> 00:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and then marry her.</v>

00:17:57.360 --> 00:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>If her father says yes, if this is, you know, you have</v>

00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've known her for years, this is a family connection of</v>

00:18:04.800 --> 00:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind, right?</v>

00:18:06.320 --> 00:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Your families know each other and that is what I'm saying there.</v>

00:18:09.280 --> 00:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I s there's nothing wrong with that.</v>

00:18:11.120 --> 00:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>By all means, it's probably a good idea.</v>

00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It just means that yes, you're going to have to wait for</v>

00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>three years.</v>

00:18:15.840 --> 00:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And so you have to practice chastity for three years.</v>

00:18:19.520 --> 00:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what men are supposed to do.</v>

00:18:20.560 --> 00:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's what It's what women are supposed to do as well before</v>

00:18:23.280 --> 00:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>marriage. So</v>

00:18:26.320 --> 00:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the age of marriage isn't so much a scriptural command as something</v>

00:18:31.280 --> 00:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that God built into creation itself.</v>

00:18:34.320 --> 00:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We can see when these things are supposed to take place naturally,</v>

00:18:37.520 --> 00:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>right? We know that there's an age of sexual maturity for men</v>

00:18:42.320 --> 00:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and for women.</v>

00:18:43.360 --> 00:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We know that there's a certain sort of just general maturity, psychological</v>

00:18:47.840 --> 00:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>maturity. No, I'm not saying that your front your you know, your</v>

00:18:50.960 --> 00:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>frontal lobe or your prefrontal cortex or whatever argument they're using these</v>

00:18:54.080 --> 00:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>days has to be fully developed and you can't marry till you're</v>

00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, right?</v>

00:18:57.360 --> 00:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous.</v>

00:18:58.640 --> 00:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But we know that there are biological realities, including fertility, that factor</v>

00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>into this.</v>

00:19:05.200 --> 00:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And so yes, women should by and large be marrying in their</v>

00:19:08.240 --> 00:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>early twenties.</v>

00:19:09.520 --> 00:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Men mid to late 20s is ideal.</v>

00:19:12.560 --> 00:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>That is how society works when things are functioning well.</v>

00:19:17.520 --> 00:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And so if this friend has managed to find a godly woman,</v>

00:19:22.560 --> 00:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>by all means, he should speak to the father, arrange things so</v>

00:19:27.920 --> 00:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that, you know, I want to marry your daughter in three years</v>

00:19:31.920 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>when it is appropriate to do so.</v>

00:19:34.960 --> 00:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>He may very well respect you for being appropriate for doing the</v>

00:19:39.440 --> 00:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>right thing and speaking to him about it.</v>

00:19:41.840 --> 00:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>If that works out, great.</v>

00:19:43.440 --> 00:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You've found a godly wife and a great gift from God.</v>

00:19:46.880 --> 00:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the way to do that here.</v>

00:19:49.840 --> 00:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And like you say, finding godly women can be a little bit</v>

00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of a challenge in some parts of the world these days.</v>

00:19:55.520 --> 00:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So if your friend has found one, by all means he should</v>

00:19:58.560 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>pursue that.</v>

00:20:06.240 --> 00:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Question three</v>

00:20:09.440 --> 00:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Should we understand the devil's plan to erase or corrupt our understanding</v>

00:20:14.160 --> 00:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of nationhood not only as a means to desecrate creation, but also</v>

00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to delay the Great Commission and the end times, since there may</v>

00:20:21.920 --> 00:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>yet be nations not born.</v>

00:20:24.720 --> 00:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>At the time of the order to go and baptize all nations,</v>

00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>America was still approximately 1600 years from its birth, so the church</v>

00:20:31.840 --> 00:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time could not have known to baptize us specifically, and</v>

00:20:35.680 --> 00:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this would apply to other young nations as well.</v>

00:20:43.520 --> 00:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Then there's just some reasoning I was reading through quickly before answering</v>

00:20:46.720 --> 00:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the question.</v>

00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to baptizing all nations, I don't think that</v>

00:20:52.560 --> 00:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the command means to baptize all nations that will ever or could</v>

00:20:57.760 --> 00:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>ever be created in perpetuity.</v>

00:21:00.640 --> 00:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's a limit to that, right?</v>

00:21:03.200 --> 00:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Because you can't keep creating novel nations, you'll eventually run out of</v>

00:21:07.920 --> 00:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>stock, out of material</v>

00:21:09.760 --> 00:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and you wind up with a a massive generalized beige people really</v>

00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>probably darker than beige in reality just because of the numbers.</v>

00:21:18.240 --> 00:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:21:19.920 --> 00:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was you know you're baptizing all the existing nations.</v>

00:21:25.120 --> 00:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You are spreading the word of God to the whole world.</v>

00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I incidentally think that the Great Commission has been fulfilled.</v>

00:21:31.120 --> 00:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we already did that.</v>

00:21:32.720 --> 00:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>This was a common belief among Lutherans centuries ago it's somewhat fallen</v>

00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>out of favor.</v>

00:21:38.320 --> 00:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>There are some of the church fathers who believed in it.</v>

00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>There are some who've argued it was completed at the time of</v>

00:21:43.040 --> 00:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the apostles, because the apostles went to all of the great nations,</v>

00:21:48.000 --> 00:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>which is to say all of the main groups descended from the</v>

00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sons of Noah.</v>

00:21:53.040 --> 00:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So there were those who viewed that.</v>

00:21:54.720 --> 00:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is an ongoing requirement.</v>

00:21:58.320 --> 00:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still supposed to spread the gospel, we're still supposed</v>

00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring things into subjection under Christ.</v>

00:22:05.520 --> 00:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>All of that still applies.</v>

00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think the Great Commission, we've fulfilled that.</v>

00:22:09.600 --> 00:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we fulfilled that as Europeans during the period of colonialism</v>

00:22:14.160 --> 00:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and conquest.</v>

00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:22:18.080 --> 00:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the way you can look at this is that any new nation</v>

00:22:21.520 --> 00:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that comes to be, and yes, ethnogenesis is very much a thing,</v>

00:22:24.320 --> 00:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>which just means the creation of of a new ethne, a new</v>

00:22:27.920 --> 00:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>group, a new race.</v>

00:22:30.400 --> 00:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a very real thing, but they have to come from founding</v>

00:22:34.400 --> 00:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>nations, right?</v>

00:22:35.600 --> 00:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>One, more than one in this case, two or more founding nations.</v>

00:22:39.520 --> 00:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And so for instance, in the American context, I've routinely highlighted Americans</v>

00:22:44.000 --> 00:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>by and large are the product of three nations.</v>

00:22:47.360 --> 00:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Historically. There are some others now as well, and I think people</v>

00:22:51.440 --> 00:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who listen to me recognize maybe people on X don't.</v>

00:22:54.880 --> 00:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of that's probably malicious.</v>

00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>People who listen to me recognize that I'm not saying that no</v>

00:22:59.840 --> 00:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>one else could ever possibly come to America and become part of</v>

00:23:04.480 --> 00:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>America and his children or grandchildren or great grandchildren be American, right?</v>

00:23:09.440 --> 00:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not excluding the Norwegians, for instance.</v>

00:23:12.320 --> 00:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I had a handful of Norwegian friends actually growing up in Lutheran</v>

00:23:16.480 --> 00:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>school because there was a Norwegian Lutheran church where I grew up.</v>

00:23:20.880 --> 00:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, in the US context, you have German, English, Scottish</v>

00:23:27.120 --> 00:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in varying proportions in different parts of the country.</v>

00:23:30.320 --> 00:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Those are the major three founding stocks of the American nation.</v>

00:23:35.120 --> 00:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And so you have Ethnogenesis.</v>

00:23:37.200 --> 00:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Ongoing in our case, because it didn't hasn't really completed yet, but</v>

00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have more Scots-Irish, for instance, here in Appalachia.</v>

00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You have more of the English up in the northeast.</v>

00:23:51.600 --> 00:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>In the Midwest, you have more German.</v>

00:23:54.240 --> 00:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But those are the founding stock.</v>

00:23:57.040 --> 00:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But that means that you had to have those founding stocks to</v>

00:24:01.520 --> 00:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>create the American nation.</v>

00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, all three of those groups, all three of those races, were</v>

00:24:07.680 --> 00:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>evangelized. You don't have to re-evangelize the American nation</v>

00:24:12.800 --> 00:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just because it's a new nation created from ones that had already</v>

00:24:17.040 --> 00:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>been evangelized.</v>

00:24:19.040 --> 00:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>That had been fulfilled.</v>

00:24:20.720 --> 00:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the Germans were evangelized, the English were evangelized, the Scots were</v>

00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>evangelized, right?</v>

00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So the American nation was evangelized with regard to our ancestors.</v>

00:24:32.080 --> 00:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>After Christ issued the command to baptize all nations, but before the</v>

00:24:38.560 --> 00:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>creation of the American nation.</v>

00:24:40.320 --> 00:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So like I said, I believe that that has already been fulfilled.</v>

00:24:43.360 --> 00:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we have to wait until every possible combination</v>

00:24:48.720 --> 00:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of of men has occurred on the earth and then take the</v>

00:24:52.400 --> 00:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>gospel to them.</v>

00:24:53.680 --> 00:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that it was fulfilled.</v>

00:24:55.920 --> 00:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>In large part during the lives of the apostles, but then certainly</v>

00:24:59.840 --> 00:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>during the period of colonialism and European conquest.</v>

00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't think that to answer the other part of</v>

00:25:08.960 --> 00:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that, I don't think that Satan is using it as a tactic</v>

00:25:11.520 --> 00:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to delay the second coming, I don't think he can delay it</v>

00:25:14.240 --> 00:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at all.</v>

00:25:15.120 --> 00:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he would love to delay the second coming, because that's</v>

00:25:19.120 --> 00:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end for Satan, in his case an eternal</v>

00:25:22.960 --> 00:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>end, which is very bad news, but he can't delay that at</v>

00:25:26.720 --> 00:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all. All he can do is uselessly and impotently gnash his teeth</v>

00:25:31.120 --> 00:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and be angry and he can cause problems, but he can't change</v>

00:25:34.560 --> 00:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>God's plans.</v>

00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Question four Mormon and Amish influence.</v>

00:25:46.240 --> 00:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Will predominantly white Mormon and Amish communities in America grow into significant</v>

00:25:51.520 --> 00:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>political or social forces due to their in-group preferences and resistance to</v>

00:25:56.400 --> 00:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>mainstream cultural influences, and if so, how should this be addressed?</v>

00:26:00.800 --> 00:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer is the Amish will not the Mormons already</v>

00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have. The Amish will not because they are the hard line Anabaptists.</v>

00:26:10.240 --> 00:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>All Baptists are Anabaptists, because Anabaptist just means re-baptizer.</v>

00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the reason that in German it's Vida Teufe, it's re-bat literally</v>

00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>re-baptizer, but because English likes to steal words from other languages, we</v>

00:26:25.120 --> 00:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>took the Greek, which makes some sense because baptize is a Greek</v>

00:26:28.800 --> 00:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>verb and we just took the Greek for re to do it</v>

00:26:31.680 --> 00:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>again. So it means rebaptizer.</v>

00:26:34.720 --> 00:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So all Baptists are technically anabaptists because they would all re baptize,</v>

00:26:40.320 --> 00:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which is not a thing, but they would all baptize someone who</v>

00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>had already been baptized as a child, which is to say they</v>

00:26:46.480 --> 00:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>would re-baptize.</v>

00:26:48.720 --> 00:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>They just dropped the anabit.</v>

00:26:51.040 --> 00:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>However, what most Baptists in the US context, which is why it</v>

00:26:55.920 --> 00:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is still useful to distinguish them, dropped, was the the</v>

00:27:00.880 --> 00:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>political views and the social views to lar to a large degree</v>

00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Anabaptists, at least the historical ones.</v>

00:27:08.160 --> 00:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the crazier groups, but even the Amish and the Mennonites and</v>

00:27:12.320 --> 00:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>others aren't like the crazier groups in history that literally had to</v>

00:27:16.560 --> 00:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have imperial troops called out to put down rebellions in entire towns</v>

00:27:20.080 --> 00:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because of how bad they were.</v>

00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully, the Amish and the Amish couldn't because they don't believe in</v>

00:27:26.080 --> 00:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>technology, many of them.</v>

00:27:27.520 --> 00:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully, the Amish and the Baptists generally are not doing that these</v>

00:27:30.800 --> 00:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>days. So the reason the Amish will not accomplish anything is they</v>

00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>still hold to those political views.</v>

00:27:37.520 --> 00:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't really involve themselves in politics.</v>

00:27:39.920 --> 00:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>They, depending on the group, more or less view holding political office</v>

00:27:44.000 --> 00:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as a sin.</v>

00:27:45.680 --> 00:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So they're never going to be a real force.</v>

00:27:49.440 --> 00:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>They are a force to some degree in their own limited area,</v>

00:27:53.920 --> 00:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>geographically speaking, culturally and economically.</v>

00:27:57.280 --> 00:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The Hudorites are particularly economically important, for instance, up in Canada, for</v>

00:28:02.960 --> 00:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>some certain reasons.</v>

00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>They are okay with technology to some degree more than the ones</v>

00:28:07.520 --> 00:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we have here, and so they're very good farmers.</v>

00:28:10.400 --> 00:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So economically they're important, culturally obviously to some degree, but they're insular,</v>

00:28:16.080 --> 00:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have that much influence on things.</v>

00:28:19.600 --> 00:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Now the Mormons, very different story.</v>

00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The Mormons have infiltrated the FBI and the CIA and many other</v>

00:28:29.120 --> 00:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>federal and state groups to a very large degree, they actually have</v>

00:28:33.840 --> 00:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of influence, more or less behind the scenes.</v>

00:28:38.080 --> 00:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't have enough influence yet in order to really have front</v>

00:28:45.280 --> 00:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>men a face, right?</v>

00:28:46.880 --> 00:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>In their own context, which is to say Utah, and increasingly Nevada,</v>

00:28:52.160 --> 00:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of California, parts of Idaho, they do have influence there, and</v>

00:28:56.720 --> 00:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so obviously they have their own politicians, they have their own groups.</v>

00:29:00.640 --> 00:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But on the national stage, you know, they tried, right?</v>

00:29:03.760 --> 00:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Romney. We all know how well Romney went.</v>

00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Not very.</v>

00:29:08.960 --> 00:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So they don't have the power to do that yet, but they</v>

00:29:13.040 --> 00:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have a great deal of control and influence behind the scenes.</v>

00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Nowhere near what the Jews have, of course, but they should not</v>

00:29:20.800 --> 00:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be discounted because Mormons have a lot of money and they have</v>

00:29:27.600 --> 00:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>almost a virulent in-group preference because they have it in the sense</v>

00:29:32.000 --> 00:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of if you don't adhere to everything the Mormon church tells you,</v>

00:29:36.960 --> 00:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you become an outcast and your own family disown you.</v>

00:29:41.120 --> 00:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We could argue whether or not that's what you're supposed to do</v>

00:29:43.760 --> 00:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>religiously. In some cases yes, in some cases no, but they are</v>

00:29:49.120 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly bad at it.</v>

00:29:50.240 --> 00:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons that a lot of times I've mentioned</v>

00:29:52.640 --> 00:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this before, if you manage to get someone out of the Mormon</v>

00:29:56.240 --> 00:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cult, a lot of times the most important part of that is</v>

00:29:59.520 --> 00:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to be is physically relocating that person and giving them another support</v>

00:30:03.920 --> 00:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>structure because they will be harassed if they stay put and all</v>

00:30:09.840 --> 00:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of their support structure will evaporate overnight.</v>

00:30:13.360 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So the Mormons definitely are a force in American politics and American</v>

00:30:18.960 --> 00:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>culture, certainly economically in their own sphere.</v>

00:30:23.120 --> 00:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>They are a very real problem going forward for the American right,</v>

00:30:27.520 --> 00:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Christian right, because they pretend to be Christian, they're very</v>

00:30:30.960 --> 00:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>much not Christian, and they will serve as almost a fifth column</v>

00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly an anchor.</v>

00:30:39.760 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Which is unfortunate, because by and large, the rank and file anyway,</v>

00:30:44.400 --> 00:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the higher ups, but the rank and file Mormons are</v>

00:30:47.440 --> 00:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>very nice men and women.</v>

00:30:49.280 --> 00:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They generally are hard workers.</v>

00:30:51.760 --> 00:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things that are great about them.</v>

00:30:55.360 --> 00:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But they're part of an evil organization that is openly blasphemous, that</v>

00:31:00.400 --> 00:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is anti-Christian, and that is very much our problem.</v>

00:31:04.320 --> 00:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Because we allowed it to fester.</v>

00:31:06.240 --> 00:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We allowed them to flee and set up shop and then expand.</v>

00:31:11.680 --> 00:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>We are to blame for that because it is our territory, it</v>

00:31:15.360 --> 00:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is the failure of our forefathers, that's the reason we have Mormons.</v>

00:31:19.040 --> 00:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>That is something that should have been solved long ago, and it</v>

00:31:22.640 --> 00:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was not.</v>

00:31:23.440 --> 00:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It was addressed incorrectly, inefficiently, and incompletely, which is why we have</v>

00:31:30.240 --> 00:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem today, and it's a much bigger problem than it would</v>

00:31:32.640 --> 00:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have been a hundred years ago, right?</v>

00:31:36.720 --> 00:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So Amish, no influence, you know, population wise,</v>

00:31:44.080 --> 00:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>good to some degree because obviously there are a lot of</v>

00:31:48.080 --> 00:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>genetically fit Amish and they're basically exclusively white.</v>

00:31:52.160 --> 00:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So in those terms good, if you can find an Amish wife,</v>

00:31:55.200 --> 00:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have some conflicts there and some problems, but maybe</v>

00:31:57.760 --> 00:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that'll work out.</v>

00:31:58.880 --> 00:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Mormons are difficult because Mormons are going to have influence, they already</v>

00:32:02.800 --> 00:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>do. And it is not to our benefit that they do.</v>

00:32:09.920 --> 00:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Question five.</v>

00:32:14.800 --> 00:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Was the great commission in Matthew twenty-eight issued to all Christians related</v>

00:32:19.840 --> 00:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of the priesthood of all believers, or was it</v>

00:32:23.200 --> 00:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a directive to those in the office of public ministry,</v>

00:32:27.200 --> 00:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>such as the apostles?</v>

00:32:29.040 --> 00:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I'll I'll read the reasoning here as well, because it's</v>

00:32:31.760 --> 00:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>relevant for this.</v>

00:32:32.720 --> 00:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I am trying to have a better understanding of the duties of</v>

00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a believer and of the pastoral office I am curious how different</v>

00:32:38.880 --> 00:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>readings of Ephesians four twelve play into this, as older translations include</v>

00:32:44.160 --> 00:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a comma dividing a phrase that seems to indicate that certain leaders</v>

00:32:48.000 --> 00:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are given to do works of ministry, not that all saints are</v>

00:32:51.440 --> 00:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>equipped for works of ministry.</v>

00:32:54.720 --> 00:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>This gets into a related question that I am not going to</v>

00:32:58.640 --> 00:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>get to this week.</v>

00:32:59.520 --> 00:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I have it on my list for an upcoming episode at some</v>

00:33:03.520 --> 00:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>point, the issue of the call and Lutheran understanding of what it</v>

00:33:07.760 --> 00:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is and you know what is the call, who has a call,</v>

00:33:10.240 --> 00:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't have a call, who should be included, what power, all</v>

00:33:13.120 --> 00:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff.</v>

00:33:14.000 --> 00:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm not getting into it this week because it's probably</v>

00:33:16.000 --> 00:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be</v>

00:33:17.360 --> 00:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>relatively involved.</v>

00:33:19.280 --> 00:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>However, as far as spreading the Word of God is concerned, generally</v>

00:33:25.840 --> 00:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking, all Christians do have some duty to spread the Word of</v>

00:33:31.600 --> 00:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>God, spread the gospel.</v>

00:33:33.680 --> 00:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It varies according to the talents God has given you and the</v>

00:33:37.760 --> 00:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities he gives you.</v>

00:33:39.520 --> 00:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So So it may be that you are the father of a</v>

00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>household, and that other than that, you have no rank, no control,</v>

00:33:49.760 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>no influence in society.</v>

00:33:51.440 --> 00:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, you work on your own land, let's say, let's give</v>

00:33:55.280 --> 00:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>an extreme example.</v>

00:33:56.080 --> 00:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You're out in the middle of nowhere, you work on your own</v>

00:33:58.320 --> 00:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>land, the only other people you see are the people at your</v>

00:34:01.200 --> 00:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>church. Once a week.</v>

00:34:03.440 --> 00:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Your duty is to instruct your wife, raise godly children, and</v>

00:34:09.200 --> 00:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>do what you can with regard to your church and your neighbors.</v>

00:34:13.200 --> 00:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>That's it.</v>

00:34:14.480 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the extent of your duty with regard to spreading the Word</v>

00:34:18.800 --> 00:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of God.</v>

00:34:20.080 --> 00:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I already went over the Great Commission to some degree,</v>

00:34:23.360 --> 00:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have a duty to fly over to Africa or</v>

00:34:27.920 --> 00:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>China or somewhere like that and spread the Word of God.</v>

00:34:30.800 --> 00:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>God has given you a time and a place and put people</v>

00:34:34.560 --> 00:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in your sphere of influence, entrusted them to your care, your duty</v>

00:34:39.520 --> 00:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is to do that.</v>

00:34:40.960 --> 00:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>To care for the things God has given to you.</v>

00:34:44.080 --> 00:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you are the leader of a nation, you have different</v>

00:34:48.320 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>duties. Because your biggest duty is to see that your entire nation</v>

00:34:53.520 --> 00:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>obeys God.</v>

00:34:55.280 --> 00:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I've said this before, and it's worth saying, and I'll</v>

00:34:58.480 --> 00:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>probably say it again.</v>

00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't necessarily envy the men who obtain an office like president or</v>

00:35:07.440 --> 00:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>king or prince or whatever it happens to be, they are going</v>

00:35:12.560 --> 00:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to get some very penetrating and perhaps awkward questions from God at</v>

00:35:17.040 --> 00:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the judgment.</v>

00:35:18.320 --> 00:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Scripture is explicit that teachers have a stricter judgment, but scripture also</v>

00:35:23.760 --> 00:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>says in many places, God is going to judge you according to</v>

00:35:27.440 --> 00:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what you have been given, and so, and of course what you</v>

00:35:30.560 --> 00:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>did with it or did not do with it.</v>

00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Leaders have been given a great deal.</v>

00:35:35.200 --> 00:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Particularly, say the leader of the United States, who is the most</v>

00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>powerful man in the world.</v>

00:35:40.640 --> 00:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>He is going to have to answer to God for what he</v>

00:35:43.280 --> 00:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>did or did not do with regard to the Christian religion, and</v>

00:35:46.640 --> 00:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing that it is practiced in the lands under his control and</v>

00:35:50.400 --> 00:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the lands in within his influence and what he did with regard</v>

00:35:54.640 --> 00:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to false religion.</v>

00:35:56.320 --> 00:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And that is on top of what he did with, you know,</v>

00:35:59.920 --> 00:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy and the culture and the social and all these other</v>

00:36:02.800 --> 00:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>things because the king is the head of the nation.</v>

00:36:07.440 --> 00:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>He is in sense sort of the avatar of the nation.</v>

00:36:10.480 --> 00:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He is going to stand before God and be judged for what</v>

00:36:14.240 --> 00:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>his nation did or failed to do.</v>

00:36:16.800 --> 00:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So So maybe don't envy those men because you probably don't want</v>

00:36:20.880 --> 00:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of judgment.</v>

00:36:22.160 --> 00:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Teachers receive a stricter judgment because teachers are standing up and saying,</v>

00:36:26.320 --> 00:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I am speaking on behalf of God when I say X, Y,</v>

00:36:29.760 --> 00:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and Z.</v>

00:36:31.120 --> 00:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So teachers get a stricter judgment as well.</v>

00:36:34.640 --> 00:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a matter essentially a vocation, right?</v>

00:36:37.360 --> 00:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>The question is asking about vocation.</v>

00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Your vocation, first and foremost, is your job, right?</v>

00:36:46.720 --> 00:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And your family.</v>

00:36:48.880 --> 00:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to some degree the duty to spread the word of</v>

00:36:52.560 --> 00:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>God within the context, again, of the abilities, the influence, the power,</v>

00:36:58.400 --> 00:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the authority, all these things, these gifts, these attributes, the things God</v>

00:37:02.240 --> 00:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>has entrusted to you, the things He has given you to do</v>

00:37:05.360 --> 00:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that. You don't have a duty to try to do what God</v>

00:37:09.680 --> 00:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't empower you to do.</v>

00:37:12.400 --> 00:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, as I've said before, it is wicked to try to</v>

00:37:15.920 --> 00:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>exercise a gift you don't have.</v>

00:37:18.080 --> 00:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We can use the extreme example, which makes it very easy for</v>

00:37:21.120 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>people to understand.</v>

00:37:22.480 --> 00:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>If God did not give you the gift of prophecy, what do</v>

00:37:26.160 --> 00:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we call it when you stand up and said God told me?</v>

00:37:30.240 --> 00:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, at the best it's false teaching, it's probably blasphemy.</v>

00:37:33.440 --> 00:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So don't exercise gifts God didn't give you.</v>

00:37:37.840 --> 00:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But again, if you're ahead of a household, you at least have</v>

00:37:41.760 --> 00:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the duty to see that your wife stays in the faith and</v>

00:37:45.040 --> 00:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that you train her up in the faith, and the same for</v>

00:37:47.120 --> 00:37:50.240
<v Speaker 1>your children, and then do what you can with your neighbors in</v>

00:37:50.240 --> 00:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>your church.</v>

00:37:51.040 --> 00:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the the basic rules there.</v>

00:37:56.400 --> 00:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's probably worth mentioning, even pastors, right, who people view as</v>

00:38:01.680 --> 00:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>having this exceptional sort of duty, which they do to some degree.</v>

00:38:05.600 --> 00:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>The office gets a little more prestige than it warrants, but they</v>

00:38:10.480 --> 00:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a general duty to go to other parts of the</v>

00:38:13.680 --> 00:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>world and spread the gospel.</v>

00:38:16.480 --> 00:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Because God has given them a flock.</v>

00:38:18.560 --> 00:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Their duty is to take care of the flock.</v>

00:38:21.520 --> 00:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So the general rule: take care of the things God has entrusted</v>

00:38:25.280 --> 00:38:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to you.</v>

00:38:26.240 --> 00:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't Don't go looking for what the world tells you is really</v>

00:38:30.080 --> 00:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>super important and you should be really proud that you went and</v>

00:38:32.960 --> 00:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>spent a week in Africa digging wells or something.</v>

00:38:40.240 --> 00:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Sort of a tangentially related question here, question six, and then I</v>

00:38:46.480 --> 00:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>will try to pull some of the questions out of the chat</v>

00:38:48.640 --> 00:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't miss them.</v>

00:38:51.280 --> 00:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any thoughts on this summer's LCMS election of Archbishop?</v>

00:38:56.400 --> 00:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Could the right candidate change the course of the denomination for the</v>

00:38:59.680 --> 00:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>better? I imagine it would be counterproductive for someone with your notoriety</v>

00:39:03.520 --> 00:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to publicly endorse a candidate.</v>

00:39:05.440 --> 00:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>That's probably an understatement.</v>

00:39:07.200 --> 00:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But would you say there are any men on the ballot with</v>

00:39:10.080 --> 00:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the potential to bring real positive change at a synotical level?</v>

00:39:16.800 --> 00:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And then another question: do you foresee a hopeful future or are</v>

00:39:20.720 --> 00:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we realistically past the point of no return?</v>

00:39:23.600 --> 00:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So there are really two answers to this, or I guess one</v>

00:39:27.200 --> 00:39:30.240
<v Speaker 1>answer with two parts.</v>

00:39:30.240 --> 00:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not past the point of no return.</v>

00:39:33.440 --> 00:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:39:34.720 --> 00:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a good man could certainly stand up, God could stand up a</v>

00:39:39.120 --> 00:39:44.240
<v Speaker 1>good man, and he could change things fundamentally, return to truth.</v>

00:39:44.560 --> 00:39:50.720
<v Speaker 1>teaching, return to scripture and the confessions, and stop borrowing nonsense from</v>

00:39:50.720 --> 00:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the world and you know, condemning racism and stuff.</v>

00:39:55.680 --> 00:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:39:57.280 --> 00:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that man is probably never going to be a candidate in this</v>

00:40:03.200 --> 00:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>sense because the entirety of the leadership of synod is constituted such</v>

00:40:08.880 --> 00:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that those men are deliberately screened out at every possible</v>

00:40:12.800 --> 00:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of our guys are still sneaking through in the seminaries.</v>

00:40:16.880 --> 00:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say how many, of course, but some of</v>

00:40:19.360 --> 00:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>them certainly are, despite the witch hunts, and there are witch hunts.</v>

00:40:22.560 --> 00:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Despite men being called into the offices there and asked if they</v>

00:40:26.000 --> 00:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know Cory Mahler, that's happening.</v>

00:40:29.120 --> 00:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>If they listen to Stone Choir, that's happening.</v>

00:40:32.320 --> 00:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact that if you're caught with a Stone Choir challenge</v>

00:40:34.960 --> 00:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>coin on a seminary campus, you'll probably be immediately cast out.</v>

00:40:38.640 --> 00:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Right? These things are happening.</v>

00:40:40.960 --> 00:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:40:42.240 --> 00:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by and large, I don't think that the leadership is going to</v>

00:40:45.920 --> 00:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>change without something something significantly greater than a general synodical election.</v>

00:40:51.920 --> 00:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's going to require change at the congregational level across many congregations,</v>

00:40:59.600 --> 00:41:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and then forcing the issue up the hierarchy.</v>

00:41:03.760 --> 00:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to happen from the top down.</v>

00:41:06.160 --> 00:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It'll be bottom up if it happens at all.</v>

00:41:08.480 --> 00:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the best way at this point is to continue</v>

00:41:11.760 --> 00:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to take individual faithful parishes out of the LCMS.</v>

00:41:16.960 --> 00:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Join with other faithful parishes in your locality.</v>

00:41:21.120 --> 00:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Eventually build that up to you know regional and then national.</v>

00:41:24.880 --> 00:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there will be an opportunity in the future to take back</v>

00:41:27.840 --> 00:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the synod as well.</v>

00:41:29.680 --> 00:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, then those congregations can rejoin.</v>

00:41:32.960 --> 00:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing stopping them from doing that.</v>

00:41:35.360 --> 00:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think right now the best thing you can do is</v>

00:41:38.400 --> 00:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>remove a faithful parish from the LCMS so that you are not</v>

00:41:42.240 --> 00:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in any way subject to faithless leadership.</v>

00:41:45.520 --> 00:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I've said before, thankfully, with regard to the LCMS for current</v>

00:41:51.120 --> 00:41:56.800
<v Speaker 1>conditions and issues, the LCMS is congregational in terms of polity, and</v>

00:41:56.800 --> 00:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so you can just leave.</v>

00:41:58.880 --> 00:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The bishop doesn't really have authority over you.</v>

00:42:01.600 --> 00:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The bishop can't tell you you can't take your church because your</v>

00:42:04.640 --> 00:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>parish probably owns it.</v>

00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Check your bylaws, make sure they haven't played any games or shenanigans</v>

00:42:10.000 --> 00:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there. But</v>

00:42:13.200 --> 00:42:17.280
<v Speaker 1>right now leaving the LCMS as a parish is the best path</v>

00:42:17.280 --> 00:42:19.760
<v Speaker 1>forward, unfortunately.</v>

00:42:19.760 --> 00:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Because faithless men have taken over.</v>

00:42:23.360 --> 00:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And they absolutely refuse to yield to the God of the word</v>

00:42:28.080 --> 00:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of God or any rebuke whatsoever, and so their judgment is going</v>

00:42:32.560 --> 00:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a fearful thing one day</v>

00:42:39.040 --> 00:42:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And it really is unfortunate because the LCMS could be the fastest</v>

00:42:41.920 --> 00:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>growing church in the world if they would just listen.</v>

00:42:47.920 --> 00:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm going to take some pull some questions out of the</v>

00:42:51.120 --> 00:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>chat right now so that I don't miss them.</v>

00:42:52.480 --> 00:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll add them to my notes.</v>

00:43:25.280 --> 00:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'll necessarily get to this question about psychoanalysis</v>

00:43:29.520 --> 00:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but I will stick it on my list for the</v>

00:43:33.120 --> 00:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>future. I will resist the temptation to make an offend comment about</v>

00:43:38.960 --> 00:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it.</v>

00:43:59.200 --> 00:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I will, however, just answer briefly a question from the chat.</v>

00:44:02.320 --> 00:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This is not uh an official as it were numbered question for</v>

00:44:06.560 --> 00:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the episode, but someone asked about putting the questions somewhere to read</v>

00:44:10.560 --> 00:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>them. They are they are in the thread for on the forum</v>

00:44:15.120 --> 00:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for each episode.</v>

00:44:15.920 --> 00:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I try to keep that updated.</v>

00:44:17.920 --> 00:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a wiki, so anyone who is a trusted in the sense</v>

00:44:21.520 --> 00:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of how Discourse Software handles that, a trusted member of the community,</v>

00:44:25.840 --> 00:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>can edit the wiki if I missed something or pasted something in</v>

00:44:28.960 --> 00:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the wrong spot.</v>

00:44:29.920 --> 00:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do try to keep that updated for each episode.</v>

00:44:33.120 --> 00:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's what I'm doing right now.</v>

00:44:34.720 --> 00:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm copying them over into that so that they are available.</v>

00:44:38.480 --> 00:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But you can go and find that on the forum for any</v>

00:44:42.400 --> 00:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of the episodes.</v>

00:44:43.040 --> 00:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll go ahead and drop that into the chat here.</v>

00:44:46.960 --> 00:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>See if we can, you know crash my forum software.</v>

00:44:53.360 --> 00:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Or just really actually overload my server.</v>

00:44:55.600 --> 00:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The forum software shouldn't crash.</v>

00:44:57.120 --> 00:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's the link for this particular episode.</v>

00:45:00.320 --> 00:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you just scroll down to the second post, it gives</v>

00:45:02.640 --> 00:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the the questions there.</v>

00:45:04.400 --> 00:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Some are asked on the forum, and so there's a link to</v>

00:45:06.800 --> 00:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the topic.</v>

00:45:07.360 --> 00:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Some are from the chat or from X or Telegram or I</v>

00:45:11.280 --> 00:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have a letter sitting here that I probably won't get to this</v>

00:45:13.520 --> 00:45:16.320
<v Speaker 1>episode someone mailed me a letter to ask me questions.</v>

00:45:16.320 --> 00:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>A little aggressive with those questions, but I'll answer them nonetheless.</v>

00:45:20.560 --> 00:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That's probably be next week for those.</v>

00:45:23.760 --> 00:45:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Question seven.</v>

00:45:27.840 --> 00:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Is our hymnity a form of teaching within the church?</v>

00:45:30.880 --> 00:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And if so, should we refrain from refrain from utilizing hymn texts</v>

00:45:34.160 --> 00:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that were written by women.</v>

00:45:36.800 --> 00:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the reasoning for it, our modern Lutheran hymnals all include</v>

00:45:40.080 --> 00:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hymn texts written by women, but historically the corpus of Lutheran hymnity</v>

00:45:45.200 --> 00:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>all came from male writers sometimes with women contributing as translators.</v>

00:45:50.480 --> 00:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the general rule there is that yes, hymns should be</v>

00:45:54.400 --> 00:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>seen as a form of teaching.</v>

00:45:56.400 --> 00:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And the way that you can look at this is what is</v>

00:45:59.600 --> 00:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the Psalter?</v>

00:46:00.720 --> 00:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>This altar by and large is a hymnal.</v>

00:46:03.440 --> 00:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>All of the hymns in this altar were written by men, right?</v>

00:46:07.520 --> 00:46:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And I know that some are going to be thinking, well, aren't</v>

00:46:10.240 --> 00:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>there things in scripture that were in fact written by women and</v>

00:46:14.480 --> 00:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are essentially hymns, yes, of course.</v>

00:46:16.640 --> 00:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There's the song of Miriam, for instance.</v>

00:46:19.200 --> 00:46:22.240
<v Speaker 1>However, who wrote that down?</v>

00:46:22.240 --> 00:46:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Moses. And so Moses as a prophet, and also incidentally basically a</v>

00:46:28.240 --> 00:46:32.800
<v Speaker 1>priest and king at the time, he was giving sort of the</v>

00:46:32.800 --> 00:46:34.320
<v Speaker 1>stamp of approval, right?</v>

00:46:34.320 --> 00:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He is the one who ran the assessment of this is acceptable</v>

00:46:37.520 --> 00:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to be To be included, and so, and obviously, yes, it's scripture,</v>

00:46:41.920 --> 00:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so the Holy Spirit is very clearly involved, we'll say, to understate</v>

00:46:46.000 --> 00:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>matters. And so I think that would be not the exception, but</v>

00:46:50.560 --> 00:46:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a way to look at</v>

00:46:52.640 --> 00:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not a blanket or a categorical prohibition on the involvement of women</v>

00:46:56.480 --> 00:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever. So can women write poetry and songs?</v>

00:47:01.040 --> 00:47:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course they can.</v>

00:47:02.240 --> 00:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say they can't do so.</v>

00:47:05.040 --> 00:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Most of the best poets and writers have been men, but women</v>

00:47:08.160 --> 00:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can do it as well, and there are some good female poets,</v>

00:47:10.880 --> 00:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for instance.</v>

00:47:11.360 --> 00:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to list them here and now, but there are</v>

00:47:14.080 --> 00:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>some. So could a woman help contribute to writing a hymn?</v>

00:47:20.560 --> 00:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think yes, as long as it is under the supervision of</v>

00:47:23.600 --> 00:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>her husband.</v>

00:47:24.960 --> 00:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So he would be the one who would have the ultimate authority</v>

00:47:28.640 --> 00:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>there because as her as her head, he has certainly a veto,</v>

00:47:31.520 --> 00:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he also has a duty to see that she believes rightly and</v>

00:47:35.520 --> 00:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that the faith is taught rightly in his home.</v>

00:47:37.920 --> 00:47:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the issue, right?</v>

00:47:39.280 --> 00:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The head has certain duties, and so it'd be usurping the position</v>

00:47:42.880 --> 00:47:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of the head if the woman just did this on her own.</v>

00:47:46.800 --> 00:47:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Incidentally, I do think the same thing is probably due with true</v>

00:47:49.920 --> 00:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with regard to translators, and every Lutheran knows of whom I'm thinking</v>

00:47:54.080 --> 00:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, because you've seen her name at the bottom of many</v>

00:47:56.480 --> 00:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>hymns, because she translated a lot of German hymns into English.</v>

00:48:00.400 --> 00:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Translation is not a mechanical thing.</v>

00:48:03.200 --> 00:48:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Translation involves a lot of judgment.</v>

00:48:06.880 --> 00:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that there should be male supervision there as</v>

00:48:11.120 --> 00:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>well, because again, this is a matter of teaching in the church,</v>

00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because the hymns are teaching.</v>

00:48:18.400 --> 00:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That was one of the biggest complaints about the the Lutherans from</v>

00:48:22.320 --> 00:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Rome during the Reformation is that we were singing people into the</v>

00:48:25.360 --> 00:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Lutheran Church because our hymns were teaching the faith.</v>

00:48:28.640 --> 00:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>That's still true.</v>

00:48:29.680 --> 00:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Hymns teach the faith.</v>

00:48:30.880 --> 00:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the best ways to teach the faith.</v>

00:48:33.440 --> 00:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We all know this Every single person listening probably knows some song</v>

00:48:40.080 --> 00:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that was used to memorize something at some point in the past,</v>

00:48:44.400 --> 00:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>right? Maybe it's the states, maybe it's the presidents, maybe it's the</v>

00:48:48.560 --> 00:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>capitals of the states.</v>

00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Whatever it is, you probably still know at least some of it</v>

00:48:54.080 --> 00:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because it was set to music.</v>

00:48:55.920 --> 00:49:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We learn a lot better through repetition, but also in something is</v>

00:49:00.240 --> 00:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>set to music.</v>

00:49:01.680 --> 00:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of the reasons that you know bards historically could</v>

00:49:05.840 --> 00:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>memorize these epic poems.</v>

00:49:07.920 --> 00:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It was partly it was set to music, it was partly that</v>

00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it had meter or rhyme.</v>

00:49:12.320 --> 00:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>All of these little tricks help with human memory.</v>

00:49:15.680 --> 00:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is teaching, and no women should not be doing it</v>

00:49:19.680 --> 00:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>unsupervised because that's inappropriate.</v>

00:49:21.840 --> 00:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It's usurping that position of head.</v>

00:49:24.160 --> 00:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It is going around the duties of the husband and always bear</v>

00:49:27.920 --> 00:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in mind that this is not just a matter of the husband</v>

00:49:30.480 --> 00:49:32.960
<v Speaker 1>being, I'm in charge and I do whatever I want.</v>

00:49:32.960 --> 00:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>No, it's God has given the husband a position, and he is</v>

00:49:37.040 --> 00:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>going to answer to God God for what he did or failed</v>

00:49:40.480 --> 00:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to do.</v>

00:49:41.360 --> 00:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you are a woman, if you're a wife, don't make</v>

00:49:45.040 --> 00:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that more difficult for your husband because he will have to answer</v>

00:49:48.480 --> 00:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to God for one day for what he did or did not</v>

00:49:51.440 --> 00:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>do in that role as your head.</v>

00:49:53.360 --> 00:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The same thing of course is true for all women with regard</v>

00:49:56.080 --> 00:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to your father, at least while you're in his household, which is</v>

00:49:59.120 --> 00:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to say before you're married.</v>

00:50:02.800 --> 00:50:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And a related question from the chat here conveniently.</v>

00:50:06.320 --> 00:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts about a twenty year old female pursuing a</v>

00:50:09.520 --> 00:50:10.800
<v Speaker 1>law degree?</v>

00:50:10.800 --> 00:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I assume this is the twenty year old female in question asking</v>

00:50:14.880 --> 00:50:19.680
<v Speaker 1>here. She says she has an undergraduate degree, taking the LSAT next,</v>

00:50:19.680 --> 00:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>however, concerning marriage and having a family and career.</v>

00:50:22.720 --> 00:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So, ideally speaking, women should focus on family.</v>

00:50:29.360 --> 00:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Finding a husband, having children, keeping a home, doing those things.</v>

00:50:34.320 --> 00:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what women are supposed to do first and foremost.</v>

00:50:37.600 --> 00:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the highest calling for a woman.</v>

00:50:41.360 --> 00:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the highest callings for a man, of course, is being</v>

00:50:44.000 --> 00:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a godly husband.</v>

00:50:45.040 --> 00:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not exclusively because men have that sort of dual life in</v>

00:50:49.360 --> 00:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the home and then in the public sphere.</v>

00:50:51.680 --> 00:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Women are not supposed to have the public sphere part of that</v>

00:50:54.320 --> 00:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as a man.</v>

00:50:55.600 --> 00:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not that women are supposed to be, you know, hidden away,</v>

00:50:59.440 --> 00:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>seen but not heard, or, you know, not seen even in some</v>

00:51:02.320 --> 00:51:04.560
<v Speaker 1>societies. It's not that.</v>

00:51:04.560 --> 00:51:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It's that God has entrusted the oversight and the maintenance of the</v>

00:51:09.840 --> 00:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>public sphere to men, and not to women.</v>

00:51:13.040 --> 00:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Women have been entrusted with the private sphere.</v>

00:51:16.640 --> 00:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And by and large women are going to have in some ways</v>

00:51:20.000 --> 00:51:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more influence even than their husbands just because of the sheer number</v>

00:51:23.760 --> 00:51:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of hours they are going to spend with their children.</v>

00:51:26.240 --> 00:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Men will not spend as many hours with their children while they're</v>

00:51:29.360 --> 00:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>growing up, as will the woman, as will the mother.</v>

00:51:32.640 --> 00:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>That's just the reality of it, that's how it works.</v>

00:51:35.440 --> 00:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly important.</v>

00:51:38.160 --> 00:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>If no one raises up the next generation in the faith, in</v>

00:51:42.400 --> 00:51:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the beliefs of the culture, in pride for your race and your</v>

00:51:46.800 --> 00:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>nation and things like that, your history, then you have no future.</v>

00:51:51.280 --> 00:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>The nation without mothers has no future.</v>

00:51:55.280 --> 00:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That is an incredibly important role.</v>

00:51:57.680 --> 00:51:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:51:59.280 --> 00:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when anyone says that women should do that first and foremost, and</v>

00:52:02.400 --> 00:52:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that is the highest duty, that's not in any way saying that</v>

00:52:05.920 --> 00:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>oh your place is here and you can't do these other things.</v>

00:52:08.880 --> 00:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's saying the thing that you can do and no one else</v>

00:52:11.600 --> 00:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>can do is one of the most important things in human society,</v>

00:52:15.440 --> 00:52:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it is more important than being an attorney.</v>

00:52:18.320 --> 00:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And so some of those are undoubtedly thinking of Hitler's speech on</v>

00:52:22.400 --> 00:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>women, right?</v>

00:52:23.040 --> 00:52:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And that comes to mind because it's related here.</v>

00:52:25.760 --> 00:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that he says in that is when he</v>

00:52:27.600 --> 00:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>says a female attorney or a female doctor</v>

00:52:32.640 --> 00:52:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that to him and I agree, I think it's how every Christian</v>

00:52:36.720 --> 00:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>should view this, that to him is not so much an accomplishment</v>

00:52:42.080 --> 00:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or something of which to be proud as the woman who has</v>

00:52:44.560 --> 00:52:46.800
<v Speaker 1>five, six, seven, eight children.</v>

00:52:46.800 --> 00:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Because the woman who has the children has ensured that her nation</v>

00:52:51.040 --> 00:52:52.800
<v Speaker 1>will have a future.</v>

00:52:53.200 --> 00:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>A woman who achieves the absolute heights of academic excellence or career</v>

00:53:00.320 --> 00:53:05.760
<v Speaker 1>excellence in whatever field, but has no children, has achieved less than</v>

00:53:05.760 --> 00:53:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the woman who has children.</v>

00:53:07.760 --> 00:53:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That is the simple reality of it.</v>

00:53:11.760 --> 00:53:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't necessarily, and I really don't think that law school</v>

00:53:16.080 --> 00:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is a great thing for women.</v>

00:53:17.440 --> 00:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen what happens to women who go to law school and</v>

00:53:20.560 --> 00:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily great.</v>

00:53:22.480 --> 00:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Not to insult my female friends who are attorneys or went to</v>

00:53:28.480 --> 00:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>law school.</v>

00:53:29.920 --> 00:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's good for women.</v>

00:53:31.920 --> 00:53:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is destructive in a certain way to women.</v>

00:53:36.400 --> 00:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And as far as I am aware, the women with whom I</v>

00:53:41.600 --> 00:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>went to law school, who are the happiest, were the ones who</v>

00:53:45.280 --> 00:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>never practiced law.</v>

00:53:47.440 --> 00:53:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They are the ones who got the degree and then for some</v>

00:53:51.440 --> 00:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reason treated that like many women treat a BA and used it</v>

00:53:55.040 --> 00:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to find a husband and then stopped practicing or even let their</v>

00:53:59.520 --> 00:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>bar card lapse.</v>

00:54:00.800 --> 00:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And now they are housewives and mothers.</v>

00:54:03.680 --> 00:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>They're a lot happier.</v>

00:54:05.360 --> 00:54:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Because God built women to do that.</v>

00:54:07.760 --> 00:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We are all happier when we are doing the things God made</v>

00:54:10.640 --> 00:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>us to do To do.</v>

00:54:11.680 --> 00:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>God did not make women to be politicians and attorneys and doctors.</v>

00:54:16.080 --> 00:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not because women are incapable.</v>

00:54:18.080 --> 00:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>This is something that many men, sometimes on the right, get wrong</v>

00:54:21.920 --> 00:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about these things.</v>

00:54:23.600 --> 00:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't say that women can't be pick something random cancer researchers</v>

00:54:29.760 --> 00:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're dumb, because they're incapable.</v>

00:54:33.040 --> 00:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not it.</v>

00:54:34.480 --> 00:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's because there are more important things women need to be doing,</v>

00:54:38.320 --> 00:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and there are duties that men have that women do not, and</v>

00:54:41.520 --> 00:54:44.240
<v Speaker 1>duties that women have that men do not.</v>

00:54:44.240 --> 00:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And so again, when we are doing the things God designed us</v>

00:54:47.760 --> 00:54:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to do, that is when we are going to be happiest.</v>

00:54:50.720 --> 00:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And as a twenty-year-old woman, if you go to law school, right,</v>

00:54:55.440 --> 00:54:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's three more years of your life spent in school, three years</v>

00:54:59.760 --> 00:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of your peak fertility spent in school.</v>

00:55:03.040 --> 00:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to practice law, particularly if it's big law,</v>

00:55:07.200 --> 00:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it varies a little bit depending on the sort of firm for</v>

00:55:09.600 --> 00:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which you want to work, they are going to work you to</v>

00:55:12.400 --> 00:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>death for probably at least three years.</v>

00:55:16.320 --> 00:55:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the load, the amount of work you're going to have,</v>

00:55:20.640 --> 00:55:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is not really going to change that much as you work your</v>

00:55:23.280 --> 00:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>way up that hierarchy.</v>

00:55:24.160 --> 00:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You're still going to have a ton of work.</v>

00:55:25.600 --> 00:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It is going to demand so much of your life during these</v>

00:55:28.640 --> 00:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>extremely important years of your life, that if marriage and a family</v>

00:55:33.520 --> 00:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>are of any importance to you whatsoever, you are trading that for</v>

00:55:37.120 --> 00:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that career.</v>

00:55:38.400 --> 00:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality.</v>

00:55:40.080 --> 00:55:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a foolish trade because</v>

00:55:44.240 --> 00:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can use whatever your undergraduate degree or something is later</v>

00:55:49.520 --> 00:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in life because when you're 40 or 50, you still have the</v>

00:55:53.920 --> 00:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>mental faculties, you still have the capacity, you still have the ability</v>

00:55:56.880 --> 00:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to do these things, and I don't think it's necessarily wrong for</v>

00:55:59.600 --> 00:56:03.360
<v Speaker 1>women to go and do some of those things later in life.</v>

00:56:03.360 --> 00:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But you no longer have the ability to have the children.</v>

00:56:07.040 --> 00:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>These years, because of the reality of biology, mean you have children</v>

00:56:12.080 --> 00:56:13.920
<v Speaker 1>now or you do not have them.</v>

00:56:13.920 --> 00:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure, maybe if you marry in your thirties you can get one</v>

00:56:16.640 --> 00:56:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or two.</v>

00:56:18.800 --> 00:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Aim higher.</v>

00:56:20.160 --> 00:56:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Want more out of life because</v>

00:56:23.280 --> 00:56:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the number of children that is considered normal these days is completely</v>

00:56:27.920 --> 00:56:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous. None of our ancestors would have thought that was reasonable.</v>

00:56:32.320 --> 00:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>A woman who has a full house is blessed by God.</v>

00:56:35.360 --> 00:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>God is extremely clear in Scripture that children are a blessing from</v>

00:56:39.360 --> 00:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>God. I don't know why anyone would not want God's blessings.</v>

00:56:44.000 --> 00:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems completely ridiculous.</v>

00:56:45.440 --> 00:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like opting to have a curse.</v>

00:56:47.360 --> 00:56:49.280
<v Speaker 1>People do that all the time as well.</v>

00:56:49.280 --> 00:56:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Why would you opt into something that is a curse from God?</v>

00:56:52.240 --> 00:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It seems completely insane to me.</v>

00:56:54.400 --> 00:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And yet people do it.</v>

00:56:56.720 --> 00:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And people also avoid blessing from God.</v>

00:56:59.520 --> 00:57:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's why, for instance, when the issue of contraception comes up, a</v>

00:57:03.760 --> 00:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of times I will just start with people by saying, God</v>

00:57:06.560 --> 00:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is extremely clear.</v>

00:57:08.160 --> 00:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Children are a blessing from God.</v>

00:57:11.200 --> 00:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What you are doing is preventing yourself from being blessed by God.</v>

00:57:17.840 --> 00:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Why would you do that?</v>

00:57:19.440 --> 00:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you can't engage in some sort of you know</v>

00:57:22.160 --> 00:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>spacing and reason and you know, planning things out according to wisdom,</v>

00:57:27.280 --> 00:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that is certainly something, but totally avoiding a blessing from God, that</v>

00:57:31.120 --> 00:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>carries its own curse.</v>

00:57:32.640 --> 00:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You have brought that upon yourself by getting rid of the blessing,</v>

00:57:36.400 --> 00:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by deliberately taking an action that prevents in this sense God from</v>

00:57:41.200 --> 00:57:42.080
<v Speaker 1>blessing you, right?</v>

00:57:42.080 --> 00:57:45.440
<v Speaker 1>God his power isn't curtailed by what you did, but he's going</v>

00:57:45.440 --> 00:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and say, if you don't want the blessing, fine,</v>

00:57:48.880 --> 00:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>don't receive it.</v>

00:57:50.560 --> 00:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't think that a woman attending law school is</v>

00:57:52.800 --> 00:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a wise decision.</v>

00:57:54.960 --> 00:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that to be entirely blunt, if your father were</v>

00:57:58.800 --> 00:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>doing his duty as a father, he would have already told you</v>

00:58:01.280 --> 00:58:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that. Because you are trading</v>

00:58:06.320 --> 00:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the most important years of your life for something that is far</v>

00:58:10.000 --> 00:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>less important than being a wife and a mother.</v>

00:58:13.760 --> 00:58:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You will be far happier as a wife and a mother, then</v>

00:58:17.360 --> 00:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you would be even as a high powered attorney.</v>

00:58:25.520 --> 00:58:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Question nine.</v>

00:58:31.440 --> 00:58:35.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of papist photos they post of the body</v>

00:58:35.280 --> 00:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of Christ and the body is all bloody?</v>

00:58:38.160 --> 00:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Supposedly proof of transubstantiation.</v>

00:58:40.720 --> 00:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly what you are asking with this question.</v>

00:58:44.160 --> 00:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you would like to follow up in the chat, I</v>

00:58:48.000 --> 00:58:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can return to this I guess, but I guess I can just</v>

00:58:51.760 --> 00:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of comment on it generally.</v>

00:58:54.800 --> 00:58:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Transubstantiation is essentially</v>

00:58:58.640 --> 00:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>importing</v>

00:59:00.880 --> 00:59:06.720
<v Speaker 1>philosophy and a sort of metaphysics into Christian doctrine that is the</v>

00:59:06.720 --> 00:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>inverse of what the Reformed do with it.</v>

00:59:09.600 --> 00:59:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm obviously I'm Lutheran, I say both are wrong.</v>

00:59:12.720 --> 00:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The Reformed say it can't possibly be body and bread, and so</v>

00:59:18.240 --> 00:59:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it has to be just symbolic language and it has to be</v>

00:59:21.840 --> 00:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bread that merely represents Christ's body.</v>

00:59:26.400 --> 00:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The Roman Catholics, on the other hand, say it can't possibly be</v>

00:59:30.400 --> 00:59:34.160
<v Speaker 1>body and bread, and so it must be his body because he</v>

00:59:34.160 --> 00:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>said it's his body.</v>

00:59:35.760 --> 00:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Lutherans look at it and say, What does Christ say?</v>

00:59:41.920 --> 00:59:43.680
<v Speaker 1>What does Scripture say?</v>

00:59:43.680 --> 00:59:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Scripture is very clear.</v>

00:59:45.920 --> 00:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>This bread, okay, it's bread.</v>

00:59:48.800 --> 00:59:52.000
<v Speaker 1>God said it's bread, I believe it's bread.</v>

00:59:52.000 --> 00:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Is my body.</v>

00:59:53.600 --> 00:59:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay. The bread is his body.</v>

00:59:57.360 --> 00:59:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It's body and bread.</v>

00:59:59.040 --> 01:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to resolve that.</v>

01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I resolve that necessarily rationally in a way that's going to</v>

01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable, right, for all human beings, satisfying for human reason?</v>

01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily.</v>

01:00:10.960 --> 01:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't personally have any problems with it with regard to philosophy</v>

01:00:14.240 --> 01:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or reason.</v>

01:00:15.200 --> 01:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that according to modes of presence and all those things,</v>

01:00:18.560 --> 01:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense, but some people are uncomfortable with it.</v>

01:00:21.760 --> 01:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to resolve all mysteries.</v>

01:00:24.960 --> 01:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you shouldn't seek to resolve all mysteries.</v>

01:00:28.480 --> 01:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You can ponder them, you can think about them, you can read</v>

01:00:31.680 --> 01:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about them what God has given us, but ultimately you believe them</v>

01:00:36.160 --> 01:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because God has said they are true.</v>

01:00:38.400 --> 01:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when Christ says, This bread is my body, this wine</v>

01:00:44.080 --> 01:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is my blood, Lutherans simply say, Both are present.</v>

01:00:48.720 --> 01:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It's bread and body, it's wine and blood.</v>

01:00:51.520 --> 01:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to go farther than that, because God Himself has</v>

01:00:54.960 --> 01:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>told me it's true.</v>

01:00:56.240 --> 01:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That is sufficient for me.</v>

01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And so we don't fall off the left side of the horse</v>

01:01:01.520 --> 01:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like the reformed and say it has to be bread alone.</v>

01:01:04.800 --> 01:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't fall off the right side of the horse, like the</v>

01:01:07.840 --> 01:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Romanists and say it has to be body alone.</v>

01:01:11.360 --> 01:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And we don't delve into weird metaphysics by saying, you know, the</v>

01:01:15.840 --> 01:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>essence and the substance is changed, or the substance hasn't changed, and</v>

01:01:21.280 --> 01:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really only We don't need to get into that.</v>

01:01:24.080 --> 01:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Once you start importing that sort of philosophy to try to explain</v>

01:01:26.800 --> 01:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>away what God has said, you should probably realize what you're doing</v>

01:01:30.880 --> 01:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is not wise.</v>

01:01:32.720 --> 01:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So Lutherans simply affirm what God has said in his word.</v>

01:01:37.120 --> 01:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the real presence, it's the sacramental union, it is to</v>

01:01:40.800 --> 01:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>some degree beyond human reasoning, but so is Christ.</v>

01:01:44.640 --> 01:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a hundred percent God and a hundred percent man.</v>

01:01:47.600 --> 01:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and try and resolve that.</v>

01:01:49.360 --> 01:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously using that rhetorically, don't go ahead and try to resolve</v>

01:01:53.280 --> 01:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that because you can't.</v>

01:01:54.800 --> 01:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We affirm it because God said it.</v>

01:01:57.120 --> 01:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>There are mysteries in the Christian faith, and perhaps it'd be better</v>

01:01:59.920 --> 01:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>if we had translated sacrament as mystery, which is what it is</v>

01:02:03.360 --> 01:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Greek.</v>

01:02:04.160 --> 01:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a mystery.</v>

01:02:06.480 --> 01:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't need to be resolved.</v>

01:02:08.640 --> 01:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It would probably better if we had translated that as mystery or</v>

01:02:10.880 --> 01:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at least included the word in some way, so maybe people would</v>

01:02:14.480 --> 01:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have a better mindset with regard to these things.</v>

01:02:18.560 --> 01:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>There are parts of the Christian faith that you do not have</v>

01:02:20.880 --> 01:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to resolve.</v>

01:02:22.080 --> 01:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And that should be obvious philosophically.</v>

01:02:24.640 --> 01:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>As I pointed out many, many times before, you are a finite.</v>

01:02:28.880 --> 01:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>God is infinite.</v>

01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You are literally incapable of understanding everything about him.</v>

01:02:33.680 --> 01:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He is incomprehensible to a certain degree because he is above and</v>

01:02:37.440 --> 01:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond you in a way that itself is incomprehensible.</v>

01:02:42.320 --> 01:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But he's omnibenevolent.</v>

01:02:44.080 --> 01:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a great thing.</v>

01:02:45.120 --> 01:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>We should love that we have a protector God who is so</v>

01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>powerful he's incomprehensible but because he has guaranteed us that we will</v>

01:02:53.840 --> 01:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be preserved regardless of how bad things get, right?</v>

01:02:56.720 --> 01:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The times are cut short for the sake of the elect, for</v>

01:02:59.040 --> 01:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>instance. Which I guess gets to a question coming up here.</v>

01:03:03.040 --> 01:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about election.</v>

01:03:06.080 --> 01:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know what you're talking about with regard to the</v>

01:03:09.280 --> 01:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>photos. I have not personally seen that argument.</v>

01:03:12.400 --> 01:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems silly to me on the surface.</v>

01:03:14.080 --> 01:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that would connect, but</v>

01:03:18.720 --> 01:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I know they do try to say that there are strange miracles</v>

01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>related to the sacrament in Roman churches, but</v>

01:03:28.160 --> 01:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is almost always on the level of, you know, weeping statues</v>

01:03:31.440 --> 01:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that we later on find out were hooked up to a sewage</v>

01:03:34.320 --> 01:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>line or something.</v>

01:03:35.920 --> 01:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So your faith shouldn't be based on weird stuff like that.</v>

01:03:40.480 --> 01:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Your faith is based on the fact that we have God's Word,</v>

01:03:44.160 --> 01:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a continuity of God's Word, we know that Christ existed,</v>

01:03:48.480 --> 01:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we know what Christ did, we know that he rose from the</v>

01:03:50.960 --> 01:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>dead. That's the basis of your faith, and then the fact that</v>

01:03:54.720 --> 01:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>God has given you the free gift of faith via the means</v>

01:03:57.120 --> 01:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of grace, usually the word, but if you were baptized as an</v>

01:04:00.960 --> 01:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>infant as you should have been, then that is well.</v>

01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the basis of your faith.</v>

01:04:05.920 --> 01:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The basis of your faith is not a crying statue or whatever</v>

01:04:10.400 --> 01:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>odd claim you get from various corners of the internet.</v>

01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's see.</v>

01:04:16.880 --> 01:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Question ten.</v>

01:04:18.880 --> 01:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>What is your read on the use of sanctified or made holy</v>

01:04:22.960 --> 01:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in 1 Corinthians 7 14 in reference to the unbelieving spouse?</v>

01:04:29.120 --> 01:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>What are the effects of this sanctification on the unbelieving spouse?</v>

01:04:32.640 --> 01:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So So I'll open that up.</v>

01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll just go ahead and read it instead of putting</v>

01:04:41.440 --> 01:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it up on the screen since I think we all already know</v>

01:04:43.600 --> 01:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what it is and it's very short.</v>

01:04:45.280 --> 01:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and</v>

01:04:48.480 --> 01:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband.</v>

01:04:51.520 --> 01:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is they are</v>

01:04:55.120 --> 01:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>holy. But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so on</v>

01:04:59.520 --> 01:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and so forth.</v>

01:05:02.160 --> 01:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So the key here, which of course is contained in what I</v>

01:05:06.080 --> 01:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>just read, is that the children are considered clean, which is to</v>

01:05:09.840 --> 01:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>say holy, which is to say set apart, which is to say</v>

01:05:13.040 --> 01:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they're part of the church.</v>

01:05:14.880 --> 01:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to infant baptism and things like that, of course.</v>

01:05:18.160 --> 01:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Children are part of the church if they have a believing parent.</v>

01:05:21.840 --> 01:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Preferably two believing parents, but one believing parent, very clearly, according to</v>

01:05:27.200 --> 01:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>God, is is sufficient.</v>

01:05:28.880 --> 01:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they still have to be raised in the faith.</v>

01:05:31.040 --> 01:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, apostasy is possible, you can walk away from the faith.</v>

01:05:35.280 --> 01:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But they are, by default, as it were, part of the church.</v>

01:05:40.320 --> 01:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They are covered by that because they belong to a believer.</v>

01:05:45.280 --> 01:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, again, raise them in the faith, baptize them, do the things</v>

01:05:49.200 --> 01:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to do.</v>

01:05:52.160 --> 01:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The other part of this, are you saved by the faith of</v>

01:05:55.680 --> 01:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>another person?</v>

01:05:56.560 --> 01:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not.</v>

01:05:58.240 --> 01:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>The way that you can be sanctified by your spouse is your</v>

01:06:01.680 --> 01:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>spouse exemplifying and demonstrating for you that faith, that Christian belief and</v>

01:06:07.680 --> 01:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing you into the church by that, right?</v>

01:06:09.680 --> 01:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And this there are other passages in scripture that speak of this,</v>

01:06:12.640 --> 01:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>right? The good behavior and things like that, winning over your spouse</v>

01:06:16.800 --> 01:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Christian religion.</v>

01:06:18.320 --> 01:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Which is what you're supposed to do if you happen to be</v>

01:06:20.480 --> 01:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>married to an unbeliever.</v>

01:06:21.920 --> 01:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not supposed to marry an unbeliever, but if you came to</v>

01:06:25.280 --> 01:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the faith after your marriage, then yes, part of what you're supposed</v>

01:06:29.360 --> 01:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, one of your key duties as a spouse who is</v>

01:06:31.680 --> 01:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a believer, married to an unbeliever, is to bring the unbeliever to</v>

01:06:35.520 --> 01:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>faith. But unless the unbeliever is brought to faith, the unbeliever is</v>

01:06:41.120 --> 01:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>not saved by your faith.</v>

01:06:42.960 --> 01:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So the sanctification can happen in the sense of the other spouse</v>

01:06:47.680 --> 01:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>by bringing the spouse into the church, or in the sense of</v>

01:06:50.720 --> 01:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the children, by being the child of a believer.</v>

01:06:55.120 --> 01:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's two different senses there, but they're both right there in</v>

01:06:58.400 --> 01:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the verse, particularly the one about otherwise your children to be unclean,</v>

01:07:01.520 --> 01:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which clearly is, but as it is they are holy.</v>

01:07:04.960 --> 01:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So they're holy because they're born to a believer, and because this</v>

01:07:08.640 --> 01:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>promise is for you and for your children, right?</v>

01:07:11.680 --> 01:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how God works.</v>

01:07:12.800 --> 01:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>God works through generations, he works down through lines, he works through</v>

01:07:16.400 --> 01:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>nations, through races.</v>

01:07:17.840 --> 01:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much individuals.</v>

01:07:19.920 --> 01:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Individuals are important because only an individual can have faith, that personal</v>

01:07:24.640 --> 01:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>faith, but God works via these means, these relationships, particularly lines</v>

01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of human beings, down through history.</v>

01:07:34.720 --> 01:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>There aren't genealogies in history because God doesn't care.</v>

01:07:38.560 --> 01:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Right. Actually take a sip of my drink here.</v>

01:07:43.040 --> 01:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Which is not the prettiest color, but it tastes good.</v>

01:07:51.360 --> 01:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And despite the fact that I pointed out the sugar-free syrups in</v>

01:07:55.440 --> 01:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the chat the other day, these are the sugar variety.</v>

01:07:59.040 --> 01:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I just felt like having something a little sweet.</v>

01:08:04.720 --> 01:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>See, I have a spot for question eleven, but no question, so</v>

01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe I can pull one from the chat so I don't have</v>

01:08:09.840 --> 01:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to renumber things.</v>

01:08:21.040 --> 01:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a question in the chat that I'm going to</v>

01:08:25.120 --> 01:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>answer this episode.</v>

01:08:26.960 --> 01:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about Michael Heiser.</v>

01:08:29.680 --> 01:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh I'll just make that question eleven because then I don't have</v>

01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to renumber my list.</v>

01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do I think about Michael Heiser?</v>

01:08:36.160 --> 01:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Michael Heiser goes way overboard with</v>

01:08:41.440 --> 01:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what he does with scripture.</v>

01:08:44.640 --> 01:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>That being said, in saying that I think he goes overboard, it</v>

01:08:48.640 --> 01:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>does imply, and I am making explicit, I don't think he's entirely</v>

01:08:52.560 --> 01:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>unwarranted about all of it.</v>

01:08:54.720 --> 01:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I read some of his stuff.</v>

01:08:56.400 --> 01:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find that compelling.</v>

01:08:58.560 --> 01:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I would liken it to perhaps once saved, always saved, and the</v>

01:09:04.240 --> 01:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of universal atonement, you know, that all shall be saved is</v>

01:09:08.320 --> 01:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the name of the book.</v>

01:09:08.960 --> 01:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I would liken it kind of to that.</v>

01:09:10.240 --> 01:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>That's David Bentley Hartz, the author of that one.</v>

01:09:12.720 --> 01:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote an essay critiquing that one.</v>

01:09:16.400 --> 01:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, he's wrong.</v>

01:09:17.760 --> 01:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Scripture does not teach that all will be saved.</v>

01:09:21.040 --> 01:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But with regard to Heiser, I think what he really does is</v>

01:09:25.440 --> 01:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he takes some parts of Scripture that are often ignored, and then</v>

01:09:29.840 --> 01:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he goes too far with them because God doesn't tell us that</v>

01:09:33.680 --> 01:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>much about these subjects and so you get into speculation almost immediately.</v>

01:09:38.640 --> 01:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Which is why I don't really address them in any depth, because</v>

01:09:43.440 --> 01:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>God hasn't told me.</v>

01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't discern it from nature.</v>

01:09:49.440 --> 01:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So I can't just acquire the information, the knowledge myself, and God</v>

01:09:55.040 --> 01:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>has not revealed it in His Word.</v>

01:09:56.960 --> 01:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So So to give a specific example, the word archon appears in</v>

01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>many places in scripture, obviously in the Greek.</v>

01:10:07.280 --> 01:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So there are rulers, and there are other ranks as well of</v>

01:10:12.480 --> 01:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>angels and others listed in Scripture, but we aren't told anything about</v>

01:10:17.200 --> 01:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>them. So we know they exist, we know they do something, we</v>

01:10:22.400 --> 01:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>know from Job that God has a counsel, but that's about all</v>

01:10:27.360 --> 01:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we know.</v>

01:10:28.480 --> 01:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And so given that that is all we know, and also incidentally,</v>

01:10:31.600 --> 01:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he misinterprets that verse in the Psalms, given that's all</v>

01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we know, we can't really do anything with it.</v>

01:10:39.920 --> 01:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So, another aspect of it, something we do actually know, we know</v>

01:10:44.160 --> 01:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's such a thing as a national angel.</v>

01:10:46.240 --> 01:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>There's an angel responsible for any given nation.</v>

01:10:50.880 --> 01:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, with regard to ethnogenesis and the creation of new nations and</v>

01:10:54.400 --> 01:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>things like that and miscegenation, all that, we're not told how that</v>

01:10:58.720 --> 01:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>works. And so anything on that would just be speculation.</v>

01:11:02.240 --> 01:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think that, for instance, there is a national angel of</v>

01:11:05.280 --> 01:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>America, because America is a very distinct nation, an important nation, one</v>

01:11:09.760 --> 01:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>God is permitted to endure.</v>

01:11:11.840 --> 01:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there probably is a national angel for America</v>

01:11:17.200 --> 01:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that, you know, we see scripture speaking of the sons</v>

01:11:22.720 --> 01:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of God, right?</v>

01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Numbered according to the sons of God.</v>

01:11:26.720 --> 01:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Tying these things together, it seems clear there's a national angel, and</v>

01:11:29.840 --> 01:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>then you have, you know, Michael and the national angel of Persia</v>

01:11:33.600 --> 01:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are mentioned, and things like that.</v>

01:11:35.440 --> 01:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So we know that's real.</v>

01:11:37.440 --> 01:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, we're not told anything about it.</v>

01:11:41.200 --> 01:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So So</v>

01:11:42.960 --> 01:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are the nations that went well and truly off the rails into</v>

01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>demon worship, did their national angel follow Satan?</v>

01:11:50.320 --> 01:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that part of the equation there?</v>

01:11:52.720 --> 01:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Are those of us who are part of nations that were more</v>

01:11:54.960 --> 01:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>faithful, did our national angel remain faithful to God?</v>

01:11:58.880 --> 01:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you can reasonably argue that, but you can't conclude it</v>

01:12:03.120 --> 01:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily true because Scripture is silent on the issue.</v>

01:12:06.880 --> 01:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>We know there are faithful angels, we know there are fallen angels,</v>

01:12:10.400 --> 01:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and we know according Revelation that one third fell.</v>

01:12:13.920 --> 01:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that it's speculation, and so I think the big problem with</v>

01:12:17.440 --> 01:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Heiser is that so much of it is speculative.</v>

01:12:21.280 --> 01:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He goes off the rails into stuff God has not revealed to</v>

01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>us and that we simply have to go, this is what God</v>

01:12:28.880 --> 01:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>said, I believe what God said, and I'm not going to go</v>

01:12:32.640 --> 01:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond that because all of this territory is uncertain.</v>

01:12:38.560 --> 01:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't desire to investigate these mysteries that have not been revealed</v>

01:12:43.680 --> 01:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to us.</v>

01:12:44.080 --> 01:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You can ponder things that are a mystery.</v>

01:12:47.600 --> 01:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But when you're trying to develop something concrete about things that must</v>

01:12:52.800 --> 01:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>be revealed for you to know them but have not been revealed,</v>

01:12:55.520 --> 01:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that's dangerous territory.</v>

01:12:57.280 --> 01:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of thing Satan wants you to do.</v>

01:12:59.520 --> 01:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>He wants you to focus on something that is fundamentally unknowable to</v>

01:13:03.200 --> 01:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you, because that is a waste of your time and effort that</v>

01:13:06.320 --> 01:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>could be spent on something that is actually concrete and constructive with</v>

01:13:10.320 --> 01:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>regard to the Christian faith.</v>

01:13:12.240 --> 01:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Ponder the Psalms instead of reading Michael Heiser.</v>

01:13:15.840 --> 01:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Much better use of your time.</v>

01:13:21.200 --> 01:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Question</v>

01:13:22.880 --> 01:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve</v>

01:13:28.720 --> 01:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Must I capitulate to the capitalist system by subjecting myself to debt</v>

01:13:33.440 --> 01:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>slavery via mortgage in order to be a homeowner?</v>

01:13:36.320 --> 01:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I have nowhere near enough money for land and hate renting basement</v>

01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>suites. The answer the short answer these days is pretty much yes.</v>

01:13:45.760 --> 01:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You are unless you come from wealth, which you do not, as</v>

01:13:50.800 --> 01:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>your question reveals, or have a family member who can loan you</v>

01:13:55.200 --> 01:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the money or something like that and be a Christian and not</v>

01:13:58.080 --> 01:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>charge you interest.</v>

01:13:59.520 --> 01:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Unless those opportunities are open in your particular case, mortgage is the</v>

01:14:04.400 --> 01:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>only way to go these days because that's the way our system</v>

01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is constructed.</v>

01:14:08.480 --> 01:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It is unfortunate, it is wicked, but Christians are permitted to use</v>

01:14:13.600 --> 01:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the imperial laws, as the saying goes.</v>

01:14:17.280 --> 01:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So So</v>

01:14:19.120 --> 01:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the only way you can actually manage to</v>

01:14:23.120 --> 01:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Own property in this day and age.</v>

01:14:26.160 --> 01:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you probably would rather be paying on a mortgage than</v>

01:14:30.080 --> 01:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>just paying rent.</v>

01:14:31.280 --> 01:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't object necessarily to renting.</v>

01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear about that.</v>

01:14:35.360 --> 01:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that for many people that's probably a great way to</v>

01:14:38.560 --> 01:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>go because the reality is there are advantages to renting.</v>

01:14:43.760 --> 01:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I've rented before, I rented in undergrad, I rented in law school.</v>

01:14:48.160 --> 01:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't rent now, so that's why you know I can put</v>

01:14:50.800 --> 01:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a but I can put as many holes in the wall as</v>

01:14:52.800 --> 01:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I want, and no one can tell me no.</v>

01:14:54.960 --> 01:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, I have to fix all the holes in the</v>

01:14:58.480 --> 01:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wall. I had to fix at three or four in the morning,</v>

01:15:04.480 --> 01:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, a leak in the pipes, because I woke up</v>

01:15:08.320 --> 01:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to get some water and I heard hissing in the wall.</v>

01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>That's my responsibility.</v>

01:15:13.520 --> 01:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't just call a landlord and say, hey, by the way,</v>

01:15:17.200 --> 01:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there are advantages to renting, there are advantages to owning, there are</v>

01:15:21.360 --> 01:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks to each as well.</v>

01:15:23.440 --> 01:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>For some men it makes more sense to rent.</v>

01:15:26.160 --> 01:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>For some men it makes more sense to own your own home</v>

01:15:28.720 --> 01:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and property.</v>

01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You know better than I do which kind of man you are.</v>

01:15:34.640 --> 01:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That being said, rent prices should be much, much lower.</v>

01:15:40.240 --> 01:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And being a landlord should not be someone's full time occupation.</v>

01:15:46.480 --> 01:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Unless it's in the sense of you are the person who is</v>

01:15:50.240 --> 01:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>orchestrating upkeeping the property, making sure you comply with all the various</v>

01:15:55.920 --> 01:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>laws and safety measures and dealing with you know the surrounding property,</v>

01:15:59.840 --> 01:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the land, the landscape, all that stuff.</v>

01:16:01.440 --> 01:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing all that stuff, that's an actual job.</v>

01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a constructive job.</v>

01:16:05.680 --> 01:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>If you just own a bunch of land and you're sitting there</v>

01:16:08.400 --> 01:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>collecting passive income, that's all you do?</v>

01:16:12.400 --> 01:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You are not being a productive member of society, you are not</v>

01:16:15.120 --> 01:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>working to earn your bread, and that should not be allowed.</v>

01:16:17.760 --> 01:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>That's impermissible.</v>

01:16:19.600 --> 01:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So, rent prices should be lower, so should mortgage as well.</v>

01:16:24.960 --> 01:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Our system is, as you say, incredibly corrupt and wicked, but the</v>

01:16:29.360 --> 01:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>reality is yes, you're going to have to take out a mortgage</v>

01:16:32.400 --> 01:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to actually afford a home, unless you come from money,</v>

01:16:36.080 --> 01:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in which case you would not be asking me the question, because</v>

01:16:39.040 --> 01:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you would just have been gifted the home by your parents or</v>

01:16:41.920 --> 01:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>something. See, question thirteen.</v>

01:16:51.520 --> 01:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I will do two</v>

01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more questions.</v>

01:16:54.720 --> 01:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to run to two hours this time, but running</v>

01:16:58.080 --> 01:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over doesn't bother me, so.</v>

01:17:01.680 --> 01:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And if it bothers anyone, they can just stop watching, so that's</v>

01:17:04.800 --> 01:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>not a problem for anyone who's listening</v>

01:17:07.280 --> 01:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Question thirteen.</v>

01:17:08.880 --> 01:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>How do we go about predestination?</v>

01:17:10.880 --> 01:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the one I mentioned earlier, which is why I wanted</v>

01:17:12.800 --> 01:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to get to it.</v>

01:17:14.240 --> 01:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it as I believe God sees all possibilities and that is</v>

01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>some kind of form of predestination.</v>

01:17:20.400 --> 01:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise, how would predestination make any sense in a religion where we</v>

01:17:24.400 --> 01:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are called to repentance?</v>

01:17:26.080 --> 01:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And so what you're speaking of, at least for Lutherans, would be</v>

01:17:29.440 --> 01:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>intuitu fidei, which is to say, in view of future</v>

01:17:34.160 --> 01:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>faith. And I say future in parentheses there because future is not</v>

01:17:37.760 --> 01:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>actually in the Latin, but it's what's implied.</v>

01:17:40.560 --> 01:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the view that God looks forward in time, sees that you</v>

01:17:44.240 --> 01:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>will believe, and then elects you in eternity because you will believe</v>

01:17:47.040 --> 01:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in time.</v>

01:17:48.960 --> 01:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I know there are some people who defend that view, and there</v>

01:17:51.600 --> 01:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>are two different ways of looking at that view.</v>

01:17:55.200 --> 01:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>One is Orthodox Lutheranism, one is what we would not call Orthodox</v>

01:17:59.760 --> 01:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Lutheranism. One is that God, knowing all things, knows that in the</v>

01:18:06.640 --> 01:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>future He will give you the free gift of faith, and so</v>

01:18:09.200 --> 01:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in view In view of the free gift of faith that he</v>

01:18:11.280 --> 01:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>will give you in time, he elects you in eternity.</v>

01:18:14.240 --> 01:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Which is really just arguing about the order of operations, right?</v>

01:18:17.520 --> 01:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Does God logically because obviously time's not a matter here, but does</v>

01:18:21.280 --> 01:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>God logically elect you first and then give you faith in time,</v>

01:18:25.280 --> 01:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or does God decide to give you faith and that numbers you</v>

01:18:27.680 --> 01:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>among the elect?</v>

01:18:28.880 --> 01:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's simultaneous personally, so I don't think there's any Arguing</v>

01:18:33.440 --> 01:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>about it seems insane to me.</v>

01:18:34.800 --> 01:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I it's arguing about how many angels fit on the head of</v>

01:18:36.800 --> 01:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a pen, right?</v>

01:18:37.680 --> 01:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>This is what someone with too much time on his hand hands</v>

01:18:40.480 --> 01:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>tends to argue.</v>

01:18:42.480 --> 01:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that the key difference here, and this kind of ties</v>

01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>into question 14 as well, so maybe I'll save some of this</v>

01:18:50.320 --> 01:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for question 14.</v>

01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for question 14, it's how we view election, what election is.</v>

01:18:58.400 --> 01:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>That's my preliminary answer for question 14.</v>

01:19:01.440 --> 01:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But for this one, election is a mystery.</v>

01:19:05.600 --> 01:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It is another one of those mysteries in scripture.</v>

01:19:08.320 --> 01:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We do not know exactly how all of this operates.</v>

01:19:12.000 --> 01:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is enough for us to be secure in</v>

01:19:15.840 --> 01:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>our faith, in our future, in our eternity.</v>

01:19:18.800 --> 01:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Because God has said that the times of tribulation near the end</v>

01:19:22.480 --> 01:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>are cut short for the sake of the elect, none of the</v>

01:19:25.600 --> 01:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>elect will be lost.</v>

01:19:27.040 --> 01:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Christ will lose none of the sheep out of his hand.</v>

01:19:29.680 --> 01:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Those who are elect will certainly be saved if you're elect, your</v>

01:19:32.640 --> 01:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>name is in the Lamb's Book of Life.</v>

01:19:34.560 --> 01:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>All of this stuff is in there in Scripture.</v>

01:19:37.600 --> 01:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And we know that God does this in time because he elected</v>

01:19:42.160 --> 01:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>an eternity past and he accomplishes this in time via the means</v>

01:19:46.960 --> 01:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of grace by giving you faith via the word via baptism and</v>

01:19:51.760 --> 01:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>then strengthening your faith via the sacrament of the table, right?</v>

01:19:54.880 --> 01:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The Lord's Supper.</v>

01:19:56.160 --> 01:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>That's how it works.</v>

01:19:58.880 --> 01:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:20:00.560 --> 01:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>just because you are called to repent doesn't mean that predestination is</v>

01:20:05.680 --> 01:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>incoherent. It's part of God's system.</v>

01:20:10.080 --> 01:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You sin, you fall, you repent.</v>

01:20:13.040 --> 01:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But the reason you are able to do that is because God</v>

01:20:16.800 --> 01:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>gave you the free gift of faith via the means of grace</v>

01:20:20.480 --> 01:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>because because you are numbered among the elect.</v>

01:20:24.080 --> 01:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And now I want to get to question fourteen because that is</v>

01:20:27.120 --> 01:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a second question from the same person, but it's the most important</v>

01:20:30.160 --> 01:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>part of this.</v>

01:20:31.840 --> 01:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Because it's how you view election that matters and in order to</v>

01:20:36.560 --> 01:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have that right framing for this, you need to understand what election</v>

01:20:41.520 --> 01:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is, how you class it sort of into which bucket it goes.</v>

01:20:45.360 --> 01:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So question fourteen.</v>

01:20:47.440 --> 01:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And a slight add-on, is the predestination belief in Calvinism basically satanic</v>

01:20:52.720 --> 01:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because it makes God a monster, as he makes people just to</v>

01:20:56.320 --> 01:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>torture them in hell?</v>

01:20:59.360 --> 01:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And And I don't worry about you know offending any of the</v>

01:21:02.880 --> 01:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Reformed listeners here, because you Reformed know exactly what Lutherans believe about</v>

01:21:07.440 --> 01:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Calvinistic formulation of double predestination, as we call it, and some</v>

01:21:12.080 --> 01:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of you do as well.</v>

01:21:13.280 --> 01:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what I believe, because the Reformed tend to read a</v>

01:21:16.560 --> 01:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>little more than most other groups.</v>

01:21:18.480 --> 01:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you probably know the Lutheran view because you've probably seen</v>

01:21:21.840 --> 01:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it contrasted in your literature On predestination.</v>

01:21:26.560 --> 01:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I do think that the Reformed are wrong.</v>

01:21:29.200 --> 01:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that the</v>

01:21:31.360 --> 01:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholics are wrong in this as well, because they sort of</v>

01:21:33.760 --> 01:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>minimize election.</v>

01:21:35.120 --> 01:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>They sort of goes under the rug for them.</v>

01:21:38.240 --> 01:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The Reformed pay a little too much attention to it, the Roman</v>

01:21:40.800 --> 01:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Catholics pay a little too little attention to it.</v>

01:21:44.400 --> 01:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>The right way to view predestination is this.</v>

01:21:47.600 --> 01:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Fundamentally, you have to start with predestination or election, the terms are</v>

01:21:52.080 --> 01:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>interchangeable. We tend to use election more pre more than predestination, the</v>

01:21:55.840 --> 01:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>reform tend to use predestination.</v>

01:21:58.720 --> 01:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It is gospel, not law.</v>

01:22:02.400 --> 01:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at election and you view it as cause</v>

01:22:07.360 --> 01:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for despair, you're viewing it wrongly.</v>

01:22:10.320 --> 01:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You are viewing it as law.</v>

01:22:12.080 --> 01:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not law.</v>

01:22:13.360 --> 01:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you view it as what does it matter what I</v>

01:22:15.760 --> 01:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do in life because if God did not elect me in eternity</v>

01:22:19.760 --> 01:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>past, then I cannot possibly be saved?</v>

01:22:22.960 --> 01:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not how you look at it.</v>

01:22:24.880 --> 01:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it's gospel, it's not law.</v>

01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>The reason it is gospel is because the right way to look</v>

01:22:31.520 --> 01:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at election and the way that Scripture teaches it, go read all</v>

01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the verses about election.</v>

01:22:35.680 --> 01:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and test what I am saying here.</v>

01:22:37.600 --> 01:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>See if what I am saying is consonant with the Word of</v>

01:22:39.760 --> 01:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>God. The way that Scripture speaks of election is in terms of</v>

01:22:44.080 --> 01:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>security. It's in terms of comfort because it is gospel.</v>

01:22:49.040 --> 01:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>How you should view election is this Yes I have fallen, yes,</v>

01:22:54.160 --> 01:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I have sinned.</v>

01:22:54.960 --> 01:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I have sinned again.</v>

01:22:56.800 --> 01:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a besetting sin.</v>

01:22:58.240 --> 01:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a particular sin that you've fallen for a thousand times before.</v>

01:23:02.240 --> 01:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You look at it by saying, Yes, I've sinned.</v>

01:23:04.960 --> 01:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I've fallen.</v>

01:23:06.480 --> 01:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>However, yes.</v>

01:23:08.320 --> 01:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>God has elected me unto salvation.</v>

01:23:12.400 --> 01:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>He gave me the free gift of faith via my baptism, via</v>

01:23:16.640 --> 01:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Word.</v>

01:23:17.760 --> 01:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>He has bestowed upon me this great gift, and He will certainly</v>

01:23:21.440 --> 01:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>see it to fruition, and he has assured me of that in</v>

01:23:24.720 --> 01:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>his word, and that doctrine is called election.</v>

01:23:28.640 --> 01:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Election is comfort to the saints.</v>

01:23:31.680 --> 01:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And for those who are outside the church who do not have</v>

01:23:34.720 --> 01:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>faith, it doesn't matter what it is, because they don't believe in</v>

01:23:38.160 --> 01:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it either way.</v>

01:23:39.280 --> 01:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>They are not going to believe that it's law, they are not</v>

01:23:41.600 --> 01:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to believe that it's gospel because they do not have faith.</v>

01:23:44.240 --> 01:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And so anyone who has faith and reads the doctrine of election,</v>

01:23:48.400 --> 01:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>reads the verses that treat the doctrine, recognizes this is gospel because</v>

01:23:53.200 --> 01:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it is God saying he will not lose me from his hands.</v>

01:23:56.640 --> 01:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>This is nothing but good news.</v>

01:23:58.800 --> 01:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not law, it's not a cause for despair.</v>

01:24:01.600 --> 01:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a cause for comfort in times of tribulation and testing and</v>

01:24:05.120 --> 01:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>trial. It is when you look at your life and you see,</v>

01:24:07.920 --> 01:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>my life's a mess.</v>

01:24:09.360 --> 01:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I have all these different sins that I commit.</v>

01:24:12.400 --> 01:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't read the scripture as much as I should, I don't</v>

01:24:15.280 --> 01:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>pray as often as I should, I keep doing this thing that</v>

01:24:18.400 --> 01:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be doing, I have wicked thoughts and all these other</v>

01:24:21.760 --> 01:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>things, right?</v>

01:24:22.320 --> 01:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>All the things that Satan is trying to whisper in the back</v>

01:24:24.400 --> 01:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of your head, saying you're a horrible person, you're going to hell.</v>

01:24:27.040 --> 01:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>He wants you to despair.</v>

01:24:28.720 --> 01:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>What God says in His Word is don't despair.</v>

01:24:32.240 --> 01:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>One, it is finished.</v>

01:24:34.160 --> 01:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Christ already did all the work.</v>

01:24:35.920 --> 01:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing left for you to do that is necessary for your</v>

01:24:39.600 --> 01:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>salvation. Good works are great, good works are rewarded, they will not</v>

01:24:44.320 --> 01:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>save you, because it is finished, it was finished on the cross,</v>

01:24:48.960 --> 01:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>already done for you.</v>

01:24:50.480 --> 01:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And then election.</v>

01:24:52.080 --> 01:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Even though you fall, even though you sin, because you are still</v>

01:24:55.360 --> 01:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in the fallen world, the sinful flesh, you are still tempted, the</v>

01:24:58.160 --> 01:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>devil is at your hand, all these problems that you have, right?</v>

01:25:02.560 --> 01:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Your flesh, the world, the devil, all of these sources of temptation</v>

01:25:07.440 --> 01:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and sin and trespass, they will not ultimately drag you down, because</v>

01:25:13.520 --> 01:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>God has promised that what He began He will see to completion.</v>

01:25:18.160 --> 01:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's election, that's a gospel promise, that is a source of comfort</v>

01:25:22.880 --> 01:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for Christians.</v>

01:25:24.080 --> 01:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And anyone who teaches about election in any other framing is fundamentally</v>

01:25:29.760 --> 01:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>abusing the Word of God by taking what God meant for comfort</v>

01:25:33.440 --> 01:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and turning it into a cudgel.</v>

01:25:35.120 --> 01:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>That should never be done.</v>

01:25:36.560 --> 01:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It is why that distinction between law and gospel is so fundamentally</v>

01:25:40.480 --> 01:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>important for Lutherans, because it is the entirety of how you divide</v>

01:25:43.840 --> 01:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>God's scripture.</v>

01:25:45.280 --> 01:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not a matter of trying to number covenants and parse things</v>

01:25:49.040 --> 01:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and put them into little buckets.</v>

01:25:50.800 --> 01:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of is this God telling you what you must</v>

01:25:54.320 --> 01:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do, or is this God telling you what he has already done?</v>

01:25:58.560 --> 01:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The law is what you must do, and what you cannot do,</v>

01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because you are imperfect, you are fallen, you are sinful.</v>

01:26:04.480 --> 01:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>You cannot fulfill God's law, you cannot be perfect as God is</v>

01:26:08.160 --> 01:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>perfect. The gospel is God saying, Yes, my law is real.</v>

01:26:14.320 --> 01:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you must repent because you have transgressed it, but I already</v>

01:26:18.960 --> 01:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>completed the work.</v>

01:26:20.560 --> 01:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I gave you the free gift of faith, you are covered by</v>

01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the blood of Christ, and you will be saved because your name</v>

01:26:26.480 --> 01:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is written in the Lamb's book of life, and it has been</v>

01:26:29.040 --> 01:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>there from eternity past.</v>

01:26:32.480 --> 01:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Those must not be confused.</v>

01:26:35.120 --> 01:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Because if you make the law into the gospel, that's a works-based</v>

01:26:39.840 --> 01:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>religion. That's an entirely different thing.</v>

01:26:41.840 --> 01:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>That's every religion of the world.</v>

01:26:43.280 --> 01:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the Jews.</v>

01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You want to go be in their camp go to a synagogue.</v>

01:26:46.320 --> 01:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And you can't turn the gospel into a law Because then you've</v>

01:26:50.400 --> 01:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>done the same thing.</v>

01:26:51.520 --> 01:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You have destroyed the comfort of the Christian religion.</v>

01:26:54.800 --> 01:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You have destroyed God's promise that you will be saved because He</v>

01:26:58.320 --> 01:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is the one who has done the work, and you have instead</v>

01:27:01.280 --> 01:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>made it into a new law to obey, and you won't, because</v>

01:27:05.280 --> 01:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't.</v>

01:27:06.960 --> 01:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It is important to keep those distinct.</v>

01:27:09.360 --> 01:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You must rebuke the sin and the sinner with the law, but</v>

01:27:13.760 --> 01:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>then you must comfort him with the gospel because the gospel is,</v>

01:27:17.280 --> 01:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as it says, the good news, it is finished, Christ did the</v>

01:27:21.840 --> 01:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>work. So yes, do good works, but you can do them because</v>

01:27:26.240 --> 01:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>God has already given you a new heart.</v>

01:27:29.360 --> 01:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>God has renewed you.</v>

01:27:30.960 --> 01:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, in time it is not complete, it is complete at the</v>

01:27:34.480 --> 01:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>resurrection, the general resurrection of the just.</v>

01:27:38.240 --> 01:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But you can do good works because you are covered by Christ's</v>

01:27:41.440 --> 01:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>blood. They will not save you, but they will be credited to</v>

01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you because of Christ's work.</v>

01:27:47.760 --> 01:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So election is gospel.</v>

01:27:50.720 --> 01:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That is the fundamentally important point.</v>

01:27:52.880 --> 01:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>That is the framing of it.</v>

01:27:54.880 --> 01:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you keep that in mind, you will not go off</v>

01:27:59.120 --> 01:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the rails.</v>

01:28:00.080 --> 01:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens with theologians who don't keep that in mind.</v>

01:28:03.520 --> 01:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>They develop some other system, some other edifice, some other doctrine, and</v>

01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>build it up, but they've started with a fundamentally false foundation, and</v>

01:28:12.400 --> 01:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so everything they build on it is ultimately wrong.</v>

01:28:15.760 --> 01:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if maybe some little piece of it they happen to accidentally</v>

01:28:18.880 --> 01:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>get right, the entirety of the thing is built on sand instead</v>

01:28:23.360 --> 01:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the rock.</v>

01:28:25.040 --> 01:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So go and read God's word.</v>

01:28:26.880 --> 01:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Go and read the verses that deal with the lection.</v>

01:28:29.040 --> 01:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>See if what I have said is consonant with God, what he</v>

01:28:32.240 --> 01:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>has said, what he teaches in his word.</v>

01:28:34.080 --> 01:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You'll find that it is, because election is not law, it's gospel,</v>

01:28:38.800 --> 01:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's meant for the comfort of the saints, in times of tribulation</v>

01:28:42.480 --> 01:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and testing, while in this world, that besets us with temptations to</v>

01:28:48.080 --> 01:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sin constantly.</v>

01:28:50.240 --> 01:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, even though you may fall, and you certainly will, God</v>

01:28:55.840 --> 01:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has already finished the work, and you will be preserved until the</v>

01:28:59.280 --> 01:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>end, because God is the one who guarantees it, God is the</v>

01:29:02.800 --> 01:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one who sees it through, and God cannot fail.</v>

01:29:16.080 --> 01:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I do see that there are some more questions in the chat.</v>

01:29:19.520 --> 01:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I am going to copy and paste those for a future episode.</v>

01:29:24.160 --> 01:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably going to have to do another long-ish episode just to try</v>

01:29:28.480 --> 01:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to catch up because the future topic slash question list is getting</v>

01:29:33.360 --> 01:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>longer faster than I am answering them.</v>

01:29:36.480 --> 01:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>However, for tonight, because I think about an hour and a half</v>

01:29:40.800 --> 01:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, maybe a little less than that, I think I'm going</v>

01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to call it here.</v>

01:29:45.440 --> 01:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So again, as always, thank you for those who submitted questions.</v>

01:29:48.800 --> 01:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.</v>

01:29:49.120 --> 01:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for participating in the chat.</v>

01:29:51.280 --> 01:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Always glad to answer these questions once a week.</v>

01:29:54.960 --> 01:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Generally once a week.</v>

01:29:56.160 --> 01:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Only skipped one week so far.</v>

01:29:58.640 --> 01:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully next week I will actually have mounted the blackout curtain that</v>

01:30:02.560 --> 01:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I purchased so that I will not have the sun trying to</v>

01:30:04.880 --> 01:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>blind me as I record as I'm sure some of you noticed</v>

01:30:07.440 --> 01:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>me trying to bob and weave to avoid the sun there.</v>

01:30:10.480 --> 01:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, if you have questions, the best way to submit</v>

01:30:13.600 --> 01:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>those is always via the forum.</v>

01:30:15.520 --> 01:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>There are links to that in the description of the video.</v>

01:30:19.120 --> 01:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There will be links in the show notes at links to the</v>

01:30:21.760 --> 01:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>show notes as well.</v>

01:30:23.600 --> 01:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I try to publish these afterward, within the week afterward, let's be</v>

01:30:29.120 --> 01:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>honest. I tried to do it a little earlier than that, the</v>

01:30:31.360 --> 01:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>day or two, but within a week afterward, I published the episode.</v>

01:30:34.960 --> 01:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It has a link to the show notes on the forum.</v>

01:30:37.360 --> 01:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And that is the audio only for those who don't need or</v>

01:30:40.960 --> 01:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>want to watch video, I know there are some who want something</v>

01:30:43.760 --> 01:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a little less bandwidth intense.</v>

01:30:46.400 --> 01:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, listen to it while you're out mowing or something.</v>

01:30:49.520 --> 01:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>As those who have a lot of acreage of grass know mowing</v>

01:30:52.960 --> 01:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>takes rather a long time.</v>

01:30:54.560 --> 01:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, that's how you can submit questions to me.</v>

01:30:56.800 --> 01:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I do also try to collect them from the chat, from X,</v>

01:30:59.280 --> 01:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from Telegram, other places, but the forum, as always, is the easiest</v>

01:31:03.440 --> 01:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for me and for others looking for the answers in the future.</v>

01:31:06.720 --> 01:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>There are transcripts and other things there.</v>

01:31:08.640 --> 01:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little behind on the transcripts because I had a slight</v>

01:31:12.720 --> 01:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>issue with a cellular carrier not sending me my two-factor authentication so</v>

01:31:17.520 --> 01:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't log into my account.</v>

01:31:19.040 --> 01:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's been resolved now, so I'll get those that backlog of</v>

01:31:22.480 --> 01:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>transcripts cleaned up.</v>

01:31:24.080 --> 01:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's it for this week.</v>

01:31:26.400 --> 01:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So I hope you all have a wonderful weekend.</v>

01:31:29.200 --> 01:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's of course Friday night, so I guess go out and have</v>

01:31:33.280 --> 01:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a good time of time tonight for those of you who are</v>

01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in a little earlier time zone, it's already nine o'clock here.</v>

01:31:37.840 --> 01:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Not that old, it's not that late, but have a great weekend.</v>

01:31:41.280 --> 01:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Go to church on Sunday and I will see you all next</v>

01:31:44.240 --> 01:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>week. Maybe we'll make it on Thursday for once, or maybe it'll</v>

01:31:47.520 --> 01:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be Friday again.</v>

01:31:48.800 --> 01:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>If we're honest, Friday's more likely.</v>

01:31:50.960 --> 01:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But have a great week and God bless you all.</v>

01:31:54.240 --> 01:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Till next time.</v>