WEBVTT

00:00:03.040 --> 00:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the 16th of January 2026.</v>

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I am Cory J.</v>

00:00:07.040 --> 00:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Mahler, and this is at any cost.</v>

00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is the third question and answer episode of 2026.</v>

00:00:15.040 --> 00:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I have uh quite a few questions at this point actually in</v>

00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the backlog.</v>

00:00:18.320 --> 00:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many I will get to this time, but</v>

00:00:21.360 --> 00:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I do promise that I still have your questions if If I</v>

00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do happen to have missed one in a past episode in the</v>

00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>chat or elsewhere, feel free to submit that on the forum, and</v>

00:00:30.880 --> 00:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that way I at least have a record of it and I</v>

00:00:32.720 --> 00:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>will get to it in the future.</v>

00:00:34.400 --> 00:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And of course right as I went to click over to start</v>

00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the stream both of my streaming lights decided to disconnect from my</v>

00:00:41.440 --> 00:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Wi-Fi. Curious timing that, but at any rate they came back, so</v>

00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I will go ahead and jump into the questions here.</v>

00:00:52.160 --> 00:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me pull up</v>

00:00:54.640 --> 00:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>my list of questions.</v>

00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I do see that we have a few questions in the chat</v>

00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>already. I've copied those down for the future.</v>

00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'll get to them necessarily in this particular</v>

00:01:11.040 --> 00:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>episode.</v>

00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So the first question for tonight is not necessarily a light question,</v>

00:01:27.600 --> 00:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>an important question, but a lighter topic.</v>

00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It is about Dungeons and Dragons, incidentally.</v>

00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about dungeons and dragons?</v>

00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it witchcra is it witchcraft or close to it?</v>

00:01:39.600 --> 00:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>What about players casting spells in the game?</v>

00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Should anyone play it, and if so, to what extent What extent?</v>

00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>The basic answer would be that there's no problem with playing those</v>

00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of games.</v>

00:01:52.160 --> 00:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You could certainly take them overboard, and I think that certainly some</v>

00:01:55.520 --> 00:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of the people who get really into cosplay, for instance, and like</v>

00:01:58.640 --> 00:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>dressing up like demons, that starts to be a little questionable.</v>

00:02:02.240 --> 00:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We could think of perhaps Elon Musk and his particular hobby.</v>

00:02:06.960 --> 00:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think there's anything wrong with those sorts of fantasy</v>

00:02:10.640 --> 00:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>games. And typically speaking, although yes, you do often have the rogue</v>

00:02:16.640 --> 00:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>player who's basically a murder hobo, but typically speaking, you are fighting</v>

00:02:21.200 --> 00:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>against evil in those games.</v>

00:02:22.720 --> 00:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You could think of it the same as sort of like the</v>

00:02:26.480 --> 00:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Doom franchise, incidentally made by Mormons, but someone asked him how he</v>

00:02:32.160 --> 00:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>felt about the fact that he made a game involving the Demonic</v>

00:02:35.120 --> 00:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and he said, the whole point of the game is to kill</v>

00:02:37.280 --> 00:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the demons.</v>

00:02:38.320 --> 00:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty clear anti demon message there.</v>

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's necessarily a problem with those kinds of</v>

00:02:44.880 --> 00:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>games. For instance, if you play I'll pick a game and perhaps</v>

00:02:48.480 --> 00:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>date myself, although everyone knows how old I am anyway, but if</v>

00:02:51.600 --> 00:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you play StarCraft or StarCraft II, right, because most of those in</v>

00:02:56.160 --> 00:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the chat probably aren't old enough to have played StarCraft I no</v>

00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one playing that thinks that he's a Zerg or a Protoss, right?</v>

00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It's fantasy.</v>

00:03:05.200 --> 00:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You're deliberately putting yourself into a fantasy universe.</v>

00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I would say it's the same sort of as reading</v>

00:03:11.040 --> 00:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy, which isn't inherently sinful either.</v>

00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Are there topics that about which you shouldn't read?</v>

00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Certainly, there's plenty of fiction these days, particularly women's fiction, that is</v>

00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a moral hazard.</v>

00:03:22.960 --> 00:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But Dungeons and Dragons is fine.</v>

00:03:26.160 --> 00:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't make it your entire personality if only for social reasons, but</v>

00:03:31.040 --> 00:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's sinful to play that sort of game.</v>

00:03:35.600 --> 00:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's pull up the next question here.</v>

00:03:39.600 --> 00:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>my tab decided to disappear, which I have to say is not</v>

00:03:43.280 --> 00:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the most helpful thing that it could have done.</v>

00:03:47.600 --> 00:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I will just go to</v>

00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the next question here an easy question, sort of to answer, although</v>

00:03:57.280 --> 00:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>transitioning more to</v>

00:04:00.320 --> 00:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>practical theology we'll call it.</v>

00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Question about how I feel about the passing of the peace.</v>

00:04:07.760 --> 00:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And for those who aren't familiar with this, this is a practice</v>

00:04:12.320 --> 00:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that is common in really a lot of churches at this point,</v>

00:04:15.920 --> 00:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>where basically in the middle of the service you stand up and</v>

00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>greet people and shake hands and in some churches hug.</v>

00:04:25.200 --> 00:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Less so in the German and Scandinavian Lutheran churches certainly, not so</v>

00:04:29.040 --> 00:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>much hugging there.</v>

00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But But to read the fullness of his question, what do you</v>

00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think of the sharing of the peace in the divine service?</v>

00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it appropriate?</v>

00:04:36.000 --> 00:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems out of place and just modern.</v>

00:04:38.080 --> 00:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand it was used in the early church, fell</v>

00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>out of use, and then came back after Vatican two.</v>

00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an accurate historical subject.</v>

00:04:46.080 --> 00:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly see the equivalent of it and sort of an</v>

00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>injunction for it in the scriptures when you see the greeting of</v>

00:04:53.760 --> 00:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>others with a holy kiss.</v>

00:04:55.360 --> 00:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's part of that culture, of course, Mediterranean cultures are more physical</v>

00:04:59.840 --> 00:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in their greetings than, say, Northern European cultures.</v>

00:05:04.320 --> 00:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>If you run around kissing everyone in a German Lutheran church, they</v>

00:05:08.320 --> 00:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>may have you committed.</v>

00:05:09.200 --> 00:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not something that you necessarily do there.</v>

00:05:12.320 --> 00:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it really is appropriate where it is located</v>

00:05:17.120 --> 00:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the divine service.</v>

00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that for a number of reasons.</v>

00:05:21.440 --> 00:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>One, I think that it just breaks up the flow of the</v>

00:05:24.400 --> 00:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>service in a way that is seemingly designed to increase levity in</v>

00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a service that should be to some degree solemn.</v>

00:05:32.240 --> 00:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't think it's appropriate in that sense because it</v>

00:05:35.760 --> 00:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is</v>

00:05:37.040 --> 00:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a break in the service, and it's a break not</v>

00:05:40.320 --> 00:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>just in the structure of the service, but in the nature of</v>

00:05:42.800 --> 00:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the service and in the psychology of the thing.</v>

00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>There's something important about coming before God and worshipping God in a</v>

00:05:50.800 --> 00:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>serious and solemn manner.</v>

00:05:52.560 --> 00:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not that we're dour and unhappy and the other things of</v>

00:05:56.960 --> 00:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>which we're constantly accused.</v>

00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Rather, it's that you recognize when you're in the presence of your</v>

00:06:02.240 --> 00:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>king, and in this case it's your king and your God, and</v>

00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your savior, when you're in his presence you should behave in a</v>

00:06:08.880 --> 00:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>certain way.</v>

00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think during the service it's appropriate.</v>

00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>There's also the aspect of it where it really just kind of</v>

00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>turns into a chat club.</v>

00:06:19.280 --> 00:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That's inappropriate for a number of reasons.</v>

00:06:21.520 --> 00:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Again, it breaks up the seriousness of the service, you're sort of</v>

00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>behaving in an inappropriate social register.</v>

00:06:28.080 --> 00:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And there's also the fact women are commanded to be silent in</v>

00:06:31.840 --> 00:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the churches.</v>

00:06:33.520 --> 00:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>If you have the sharing of the peace in the middle of</v>

00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the service, are you just going to tell all the women to</v>

00:06:39.200 --> 00:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>sit down and not greet people?</v>

00:06:41.600 --> 00:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's appropriate.</v>

00:06:43.280 --> 00:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to stand tell them to stand up and talk</v>

00:06:45.280 --> 00:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to each other?</v>

00:06:45.920 --> 00:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>That's also not appropriate.</v>

00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Because they're commanded to be silent in the churches, which is the</v>

00:06:50.320 --> 00:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>gathered church while you have the service ongoing</v>

00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think the solution is pretty simple, just have that before</v>

00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the service or after the service, which is really what you would</v>

00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the early church because generally speaking, they shared an</v>

00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>actual meal.</v>

00:07:08.880 --> 00:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just the Eucharist, it wasn't just the Lord's Supper.</v>

00:07:12.640 --> 00:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't just bread and wine.</v>

00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, bread and wine were certainly involved, but you had an actual</v>

00:07:17.760 --> 00:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>meal. That's the natural place to stand up and greet people and</v>

00:07:21.840 --> 00:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>talk and have the social interaction.</v>

00:07:24.720 --> 00:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Not as part of the divine service, but yes, it should be</v>

00:07:27.200 --> 00:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>part of your church.</v>

00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>These days, you know, it's coffee and donuts or maybe have something</v>

00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>available it's a little healthier than donuts, I say as someone who</v>

00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe is a little hypocritical there because I always brought donuts to</v>

00:07:39.680 --> 00:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>my previous churches.</v>

00:07:40.880 --> 00:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, that's the appropriate place for it.</v>

00:07:44.400 --> 00:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it should be right in the middle of</v>

00:07:46.880 --> 00:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the divine service.</v>

00:07:47.840 --> 00:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just a very weird placement that seems almost deliberately designed to</v>

00:07:53.120 --> 00:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>make the service less serious, to introduce levity where it's not appropriate.</v>

00:08:04.480 --> 00:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess now that we've gotten a little bit into the stream</v>

00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube won't immediately notice, we can talk about the third reich,</v>

00:08:12.320 --> 00:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>since that's the next question.</v>

00:08:14.320 --> 00:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they will eventually recognize the Third Reich or its</v>

00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>leader, which is to say Adolf Hitler, as Christian to smear us?</v>

00:08:21.440 --> 00:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Once the Judeo Christian narrative starts to crack, they'll need something else</v>

00:08:24.720 --> 00:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep the would be Christians on the reservation.</v>

00:08:27.440 --> 00:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they might try something like Nazis bad, Nazis are</v>

00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Christian, therefore Christians are bad?</v>

00:08:33.840 --> 00:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>This has actually been done a number of times historically.</v>

00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>This is definitely something that has cropped up even not just, you</v>

00:08:42.800 --> 00:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know, decades ago.</v>

00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Although at this point I guess that would include my lifetime, but</v>

00:08:47.120 --> 00:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>even within the past ten years, say, this was something that every</v>

00:08:51.440 --> 00:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so often it would cycle in, particularly on social media.</v>

00:08:54.800 --> 00:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You would get it was sort of the new atheists and some</v>

00:08:58.640 --> 00:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>others like that who would try to use that argument against Christianity</v>

00:09:02.320 --> 00:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because they would say, well, the third Reich claimed to be Christian,</v>

00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they did all these evil things, and therefore Christians are evil.</v>

00:09:08.560 --> 00:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The argument, even if you formalize it a little better, is of</v>

00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>course not logically sound, but that hardly matters for rhetoric.</v>

00:09:15.200 --> 00:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, will they try it again and will it</v>

00:09:18.400 --> 00:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be effective?</v>

00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, because it's not a very good tactic for</v>

00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>them, particularly because all it does is drive those who would never</v>

00:09:30.160 --> 00:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the Third Reich and what they actually believed and would</v>

00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>simply mindlessly believe the propaganda.</v>

00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So whatever they were told in fifth grade basically, and whatever video</v>

00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they sh they saw, probably Schindler's List or you know, read the</v>

00:09:44.800 --> 00:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>diary Van Frank or whatever it happens to be, both admitted pieces</v>

00:09:48.400 --> 00:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of fiction, incidentally.</v>

00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>One more proved in a court of law, one admitted, because of</v>

00:09:53.920 --> 00:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>course Schindler's list is admittedly fiction.</v>

00:09:56.560 --> 00:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not even contended it's real, much like Knight is also a</v>

00:10:00.160 --> 00:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>work of fiction admitted by the author.</v>

00:10:02.800 --> 00:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So you would have people who would believe those things.</v>

00:10:06.560 --> 00:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you start pushing the Third Reich was Christian, some percentage</v>

00:10:12.480 --> 00:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of those men are going to say, okay, why are they saying</v>

00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that? Of course they're going to think initially, oh, they're just attacking</v>

00:10:20.800 --> 00:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Christianity, I don't care.</v>

00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just crazy leftist atheists attacking Christianity, whatever.</v>

00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that that percentage of them will go hang on</v>

00:10:32.160 --> 00:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute, I want to look at this now.</v>

00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>If they say they were Christian, is there any evidence?</v>

00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>There's never that many people who will do it, but if you</v>

00:10:40.320 --> 00:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lose two percent, three, five percent, that's a big deal for them</v>

00:10:45.520 --> 00:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>when they're already losing</v>

00:10:47.440 --> 00:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>people day by day who are looking at the truth.</v>

00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know they're dumb enough to pursue that.</v>

00:10:54.080 --> 00:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean that they aren't, because quite frankly, they sometimes</v>

00:10:57.200 --> 00:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>do things that are particularly stupid.</v>

00:10:58.960 --> 00:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's also the fact that Satan just drives them to do</v>

00:11:02.400 --> 00:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>dumb things.</v>

00:11:03.680 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>They are compelled to be evil, and so sometimes they just do</v>

00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>things that don't benefit them, but they do them anyway.</v>

00:11:11.840 --> 00:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:11:13.520 --> 00:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It could happen.</v>

00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's likely.</v>

00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's more likely is that our side continues to</v>

00:11:21.040 --> 00:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>push the truth and continues to push back against the false narrative.</v>

00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And that is what starts to bring people over.</v>

00:11:27.200 --> 00:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're going to try to double down on the</v>

00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>post-war consensus, the new global religion, and try to conflate that with</v>

00:11:33.760 --> 00:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Christianity and say that you are not a Christian unless you believe</v>

00:11:37.520 --> 00:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>X, Y, and Z.</v>

00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Never mind the fact that no one pre 1965 believed any of</v>

00:11:43.840 --> 00:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, right?</v>

00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>In particular the one that's blowing up now, because of course it</v>

00:11:47.600 --> 00:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is interracial marriage.</v>

00:11:49.520 --> 00:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, until very recently in this country, Loving V, Virginia, it was</v>

00:11:54.480 --> 00:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a crime.</v>

00:11:55.600 --> 00:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>A punishable crime.</v>

00:11:57.680 --> 00:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a crime in many historical countries.</v>

00:12:00.480 --> 00:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a crime in most of the Western world until not</v>

00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that long ago In this country until very recently.</v>

00:12:06.640 --> 00:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And so you have people who are saying that you can't possibly</v>

00:12:09.680 --> 00:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be a Christian and believe that should be banned or think that</v>

00:12:12.320 --> 00:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's wrong in any way.</v>

00:12:13.680 --> 00:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, what are they actually saying?</v>

00:12:15.200 --> 00:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>They're saying that no one born before loving V.</v>

00:12:19.280 --> 00:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Virginia, or at least no one born and not changing his views,</v>

00:12:23.680 --> 00:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so no one who died before it could possibly be saved.</v>

00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Because well, you're not a Christian if you believe these things.</v>

00:12:29.440 --> 00:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's completely ludicrous.</v>

00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The same as the slavery issue and so many other things because</v>

00:12:34.800 --> 00:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we see all of these men down through the centuries of Christendom</v>

00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>who believed these things firmly and we're much better Christians than the</v>

00:12:44.640 --> 00:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>men we see arguing you can't believe these things and be Christian.</v>

00:12:48.240 --> 00:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll keep trying to double down on that because that's</v>

00:12:51.760 --> 00:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of they back themselves into a corner, it's all they can</v>

00:12:54.480 --> 00:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do. If they give up any of those positions, the entire edifice</v>

00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>crumbles, which is of course their great weakness.</v>

00:13:01.280 --> 00:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They can't lose anything in their little edifice because it is so</v>

00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>weak. It's a house of cards.</v>

00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And any link in that chain, if you can break it, you</v>

00:13:12.880 --> 00:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>can get people to question the next one.</v>

00:13:14.480 --> 00:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why they have to defend interracial marriage</v>

00:13:18.960 --> 00:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so vehemently, because they recognize that that's a link pretty far back</v>

00:13:24.480 --> 00:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in their chain because all of the civil rights stuff and the</v>

00:13:29.280 --> 00:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>tolerance so-called for homosexuality and the legalization of homosexual so-called marriage, all</v>

00:13:35.680 --> 00:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of that flows logically</v>

00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and legally, incidentally, the legal cases are also a chain, from Loving</v>

00:13:42.240 --> 00:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>V, Virginia, from the Civil Rights Act, from all of these arguments</v>

00:13:47.120 --> 00:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>about MLK and all that stuff.</v>

00:13:49.040 --> 00:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They can't lose any of that and not suffer significant downstream consequences.</v>

00:13:54.480 --> 00:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So they'll just keep doubling down.</v>

00:13:56.480 --> 00:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Which is of course an opportunity for us.</v>

00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>The next question, a fairly common sort of area for questions, is</v>

00:14:16.800 --> 00:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>marriage a command of God?</v>

00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think the short answer to that is of course yes,</v>

00:14:25.520 --> 00:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but not But not absolutely yes.</v>

00:14:28.560 --> 00:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And the reason it's not absolutely yes is be of course there</v>

00:14:33.600 --> 00:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is the issue of celibacy, which is something that is granted to</v>

00:14:37.840 --> 00:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>some men.</v>

00:14:39.360 --> 00:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's the key.</v>

00:14:40.960 --> 00:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It's granted to some men.</v>

00:14:43.520 --> 00:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not granted to many, in fact, you probably don't have it.</v>

00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And generally speaking, you should not try to exercise a gift that</v>

00:14:51.680 --> 00:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have because it could be sinful, depending on the gift</v>

00:14:56.080 --> 00:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and what it is you're trying to do.</v>

00:14:57.280 --> 00:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, obvious one would be if you don't have the</v>

00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gift of prophecy and you stand up and say I'm a prophet,</v>

00:15:02.880 --> 00:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>there are some problems here.</v>

00:15:04.960 --> 00:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you have if you do not, rather, have the gift</v>

00:15:08.080 --> 00:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of celibacy and you try to exercise it, you're going to set</v>

00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself up for failure and you're going to fall into sexual sin.</v>

00:15:15.040 --> 00:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality of how that is going to go.</v>

00:15:18.000 --> 00:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Because at some point, biology is going to make some demands and</v>

00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a very difficult time withstanding those demands.</v>

00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality of being a fallen creature.</v>

00:15:28.640 --> 00:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say that you can't live a chaste life even</v>

00:15:32.960 --> 00:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if you do not have the gift of celibacy, because of course</v>

00:15:35.600 --> 00:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you can live a chaste life.</v>

00:15:36.560 --> 00:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Being in marriage is chaste, but you could even live a chaste</v>

00:15:39.920 --> 00:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>life as a single individual, but it's going to come with challenges.</v>

00:15:43.920 --> 00:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's going to come with very real challenges.</v>

00:15:46.320 --> 00:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And you can spare yourself that by using the only cure for</v>

00:15:51.360 --> 00:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the temptation of which God speaks in Scripture.</v>

00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Other than, of course, self-control, which, yes, you can exercise self-control to</v>

00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree.</v>

00:16:00.800 --> 00:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But when scripture speaks about the solution for sexual sin, it gives</v>

00:16:06.960 --> 00:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>marriage as the cure.</v>

00:16:08.240 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And so there there are a number of verses, of course, we</v>

00:16:10.240 --> 00:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can look at for this, and I'll just go over a handful</v>

00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of them here.</v>

00:16:14.640 --> 00:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The first one, of course, is Matthew nineteen is going to be</v>

00:16:17.600 --> 00:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important ones, because this is where Christ speaks</v>

00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that not everyone is given this.</v>

00:16:23.280 --> 00:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Not every one can receive this saying, but only those to whom</v>

00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it is given, for there are eunuchs who have been so from</v>

00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men,</v>

00:16:32.080 --> 00:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake</v>

00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of the kingdom of he's not speaking exclusively about physically making yourself</v>

00:16:39.600 --> 00:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a eunuch here.</v>

00:16:40.400 --> 00:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>This has been dealt with to death in the ancient church.</v>

00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So when neopagans and others say that you're supposed to emasculate yourself</v>

00:16:47.440 --> 00:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to deal with the temptation to sexual sin that is</v>

00:16:51.040 --> 00:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>never commanded, that is self abuse, that is not something Scripture commands,</v>

00:16:54.560 --> 00:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>anywhere. That aside.</v>

00:16:56.960 --> 00:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.</v>

00:17:01.200 --> 00:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a limitation.</v>

00:17:04.160 --> 00:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone can receive this saying, let the one who is able</v>

00:17:07.680 --> 00:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to receive it receive it.</v>

00:17:09.600 --> 00:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have the gift, don't try to exercise it.</v>

00:17:14.320 --> 00:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You'll get married.</v>

00:17:15.360 --> 00:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the solution.</v>

00:17:16.800 --> 00:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Because if you don't have the gift of celibacy, the temptation will</v>

00:17:19.600 --> 00:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be there.</v>

00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So cure the temptation with the only medicine God provides.</v>

00:17:26.320 --> 00:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And so another passage that is related to this to the unmarried</v>

00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and the widows I say it is good for them to remain</v>

00:17:32.000 --> 00:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>single as I am.</v>

00:17:33.840 --> 00:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But if they cannot exercise self control, they should marry.</v>

00:17:38.000 --> 00:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of the key verses here, this part, for</v>

00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it is better to marry than to burn with passion.</v>

00:17:44.640 --> 00:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a question of do you have the gift of celibacy,</v>

00:17:50.320 --> 00:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that continence set that's self control.</v>

00:17:53.840 --> 00:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't use the medicine God has provided.</v>

00:17:58.400 --> 00:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And the way that I always explain this to people is very</v>

00:18:00.800 --> 00:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>simple. You can tell if you're celibate very simply.</v>

00:18:05.040 --> 00:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever had a sexual thought about a woman?</v>

00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>If the answer is yes, you're not celibate.</v>

00:18:11.360 --> 00:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Because celibacy in that sense is basically asexuality.</v>

00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You lack that temptation totally.</v>

00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>God gives that gift to some men because he wants them to</v>

00:18:21.920 --> 00:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>perform some task for the church.</v>

00:18:24.320 --> 00:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That is something that is given seemingly exceptionally.</v>

00:18:27.840 --> 00:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like very few men have had it.</v>

00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And we certainly know that men who have attempted to exercise it</v>

00:18:33.280 --> 00:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when they don't have it, have fallen into horrible temptations and horrible</v>

00:18:37.360 --> 00:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sexual sin.</v>

00:18:38.720 --> 00:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We all know what happens historically with monasteries.</v>

00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that all monks are bad.</v>

00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not condemning all monks.</v>

00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I would condemn monasteries.</v>

00:18:47.440 --> 00:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think monasticism in that form is good.</v>

00:18:50.960 --> 00:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, if it's just men who live in a retreat for a</v>

00:18:54.800 --> 00:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>certain period of time to study scripture and then go back into</v>

00:18:57.360 --> 00:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the world, totally different thing.</v>

00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>That happened at some points in history.</v>

00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.</v>

00:19:02.880 --> 00:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>If you simply unilaterally declare, I am going to attempt to be</v>

00:19:07.840 --> 00:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>celibate despite the fact God didn't give me the gift, you are</v>

00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>going to fall into the sorts of sins that plagued the monasteries</v>

00:19:16.080 --> 00:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for centuries.</v>

00:19:17.280 --> 00:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily the worst kind, but there were certainly problems between monks</v>

00:19:22.480 --> 00:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and nuns down through history.</v>

00:19:24.640 --> 00:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>That was often what happened.</v>

00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And that leads to additional sins in some cases, particularly egregious sins</v>

00:19:31.920 --> 00:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in some cases historically.</v>

00:19:34.080 --> 00:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't try to create your own medicine when God has provided a</v>

00:19:37.920 --> 00:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cure.</v>

00:19:40.640 --> 00:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course we can go to passages of scripture dealing with</v>

00:19:45.200 --> 00:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>marriage as being a blessing from God, marriage as being something that</v>

00:19:48.800 --> 00:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>God wants you to enjoy.</v>

00:19:50.800 --> 00:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'll I'll just go ahead and use the ESV instead of</v>

00:19:53.120 --> 00:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>switching over to the Septuagint for this.</v>

00:19:55.520 --> 00:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It is close enough in this case, so let your fountain be</v>

00:19:58.240 --> 00:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>blessed and rejoice in the wife of your youth, a lovely dear,</v>

00:20:01.520 --> 00:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a graceful doe.</v>

00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Let her breast fill you at all times with delight, be intoxicated</v>

00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>always in her love.</v>

00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to say that God doesn't praise marriage highly, to say</v>

00:20:12.000 --> 00:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing of the fact that the Song of Solomon exists in scripture.</v>

00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Incidentally, one of the books that I do skip during the only</v>

00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>book actually that I skip during the Through the Bible in a</v>

00:20:22.640 --> 00:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>year podcast.</v>

00:20:23.840 --> 00:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>If you want to read that, you can read it for yourself.</v>

00:20:25.600 --> 00:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to read it to you.</v>

00:20:27.760 --> 00:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Later on in Proverbs, he who finds a wife finds a good</v>

00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thing and obtains favor from the Lord.</v>

00:20:33.600 --> 00:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Marriage is praised very highly in Scripture.</v>

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Marriage is never something Christians should denigrate, it is not something that</v>

00:20:39.120 --> 00:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>should be uncommon, it is something that should be held in high</v>

00:20:42.400 --> 00:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>regard. It is something that should be recommended.</v>

00:20:45.840 --> 00:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Book of Concord goes so far, and this is</v>

00:20:48.320 --> 00:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>something by which Lutherans are of course bound, it goes so far</v>

00:20:51.360 --> 00:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>as to say one of the duties of the sovereign, of the</v>

00:20:54.560 --> 00:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>state, of the government, is to ensure that marriages are contracted among</v>

00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the populace, and that those who are not given the gift of</v>

00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>celibacy marry.</v>

00:21:05.040 --> 00:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>That's assigned as a duty of the state, according to Lutheran doctrine.</v>

00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And I would say also according to the scriptures.</v>

00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And one of the marks of false teachers here in First Timothy,</v>

00:21:15.760 --> 00:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>those who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods.</v>

00:21:19.680 --> 00:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, and we can think of churches that have done that historically,</v>

00:21:23.040 --> 00:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>some who do it today.</v>

00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>If you forbid marriage, that is one of the signs of a</v>

00:21:28.240 --> 00:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>false teacher.</v>

00:21:29.600 --> 00:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You cannot condemn marriage.</v>

00:21:34.320 --> 00:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think I'll end the commentary on marriage with probably one</v>

00:21:37.920 --> 00:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most important ones that people often don't think of.</v>

00:21:41.520 --> 00:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>When they really should.</v>

00:21:43.840 --> 00:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the penultimate one.</v>

00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to that one next.</v>

00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But and God blessed them, and God said to them, be fruitful</v>

00:21:48.480 --> 00:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it.</v>

00:21:53.200 --> 00:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You cannot, in God's scheme, so to say without sinning, fill the</v>

00:21:58.480 --> 00:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>earth without marriage.</v>

00:22:01.680 --> 00:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And the last comment I would make is that Adam walked with</v>

00:22:05.120 --> 00:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>God in the garden.</v>

00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Adam spoke with God face to face.</v>

00:22:09.840 --> 00:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's of course Christ, the pre incarnate Christ, if You want to</v>

00:22:13.360 --> 00:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with the timeline issues.</v>

00:22:16.000 --> 00:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet God said it is not good for man to be</v>

00:22:19.120 --> 00:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>alone. Man who saw God face to face, walked with him in</v>

00:22:25.600 --> 00:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the garden, God called alone, and said, Of all the things in</v>

00:22:30.960 --> 00:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>creation, that was not good.</v>

00:22:33.840 --> 00:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>That is how highly God prizes marriage and wives.</v>

00:22:37.680 --> 00:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We should never speak of them in any other terms, because that</v>

00:22:40.960 --> 00:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is how highly God praises it, and the only, again, only medicine</v>

00:22:45.760 --> 00:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>God gives for the temptation to sexual sin.</v>

00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer is is marriage commanded?</v>

00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>In almost all cases, yes.</v>

00:22:54.320 --> 00:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Unless you have the gift of celibacy, which you probably don't</v>

00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I will just go with the next one that also</v>

00:23:19.200 --> 00:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is exegesis go over a few more passages of scripture here.</v>

00:23:24.160 --> 00:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>To what extent can a woman be a deaconess today?</v>

00:23:28.480 --> 00:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the purpose of one today?</v>

00:23:30.640 --> 00:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>To me it seems as a way to subvert authority.</v>

00:23:33.280 --> 00:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Short answer is yes, and slowly get women to be pastors and</v>

00:23:36.240 --> 00:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have authority.</v>

00:23:37.040 --> 00:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Again, short answer is yes.</v>

00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember Wo possibly saying that deaconesses in the early church would</v>

00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>help young women in the community, and not be your try to</v>

00:23:46.080 --> 00:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be a pastor in all but name.</v>

00:23:48.080 --> 00:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>That is certainly true.</v>

00:23:49.760 --> 00:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That is their role, because you can think of the only times</v>

00:23:54.000 --> 00:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>where it speaks of the role of women specifically in the church</v>

00:23:57.360 --> 00:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>church in scripture, and I will get into the scripture passages as</v>

00:24:01.360 --> 00:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>well, but when it speaks of that, it speaks of women in</v>

00:24:06.000 --> 00:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a service role, in a support role, which is the natural role</v>

00:24:10.320 --> 00:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for women.</v>

00:24:10.880 --> 00:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What is woman?</v>

00:24:12.000 --> 00:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>A helper fit for man?</v>

00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>That is what woman is to be in the church as well.</v>

00:24:16.000 --> 00:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>She is not to teach.</v>

00:24:17.280 --> 00:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We know that, of course, because what does Scripture say about women</v>

00:24:21.520 --> 00:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>teaching? Well it says I do not permit a woman to teach</v>

00:24:26.160 --> 00:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>or to exercise authority over a man.</v>

00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Rather she is to remain silent.</v>

00:24:31.040 --> 00:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That pretty much precludes her taking on a teaching role, and so</v>

00:24:34.560 --> 00:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a deaconess, so called, cannot be a teacher.</v>

00:24:39.760 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the first problems, of course, is deaconess here, and let</v>

00:24:43.440 --> 00:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can there it is.</v>

00:24:45.680 --> 00:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So actually I've already got it typed in, that's convenient The word</v>

00:24:49.040 --> 00:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>here is diaconos, which is a masculine term, incidentally, but it does</v>

00:24:54.800 --> 00:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>appear one time in scripture, only once, in</v>

00:24:59.840 --> 00:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the feminine.</v>

00:25:01.040 --> 00:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And I can say in the feminine because of the context, and</v>

00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain that for those who are less familiar with how grammar</v>

00:25:06.880 --> 00:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>works in languages that aren't English.</v>

00:25:09.520 --> 00:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Because English is a little loose.</v>

00:25:11.920 --> 00:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in this case, we're dealing with a second declension noun, diaconos here.</v>

00:25:18.480 --> 00:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It is masculine, but it can be feminine.</v>

00:25:22.160 --> 00:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do is change the article.</v>

00:25:24.400 --> 00:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>If you change the article, that's the little omicron here.</v>

00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>If you change the article and make it a feminine noun instead,</v>

00:25:32.240 --> 00:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>then you have the feminine version, deaconess as we would call it</v>

00:25:36.560 --> 00:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in English.</v>

00:25:37.840 --> 00:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It appears once.</v>

00:25:40.160 --> 00:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>However, the problem is</v>

00:25:43.200 --> 00:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have the article in Greek.</v>

00:25:45.680 --> 00:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And so in this case, all you have is diaconos, or diacon,</v>

00:25:49.680 --> 00:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>actually, because it's in the accusative.</v>

00:25:51.440 --> 00:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's in the accusative But the accusative in the second declension has</v>

00:25:56.320 --> 00:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the same ending in masculine and feminine, which is sort of a</v>

00:25:59.760 --> 00:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>long grammatical way of saying it's the same word, masculine or feminine.</v>

00:26:05.200 --> 00:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But you can tell by the context.</v>

00:26:07.120 --> 00:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Because of course I'm speaking of the book of Romans, the end</v>

00:26:10.400 --> 00:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of Romans.</v>

00:26:11.840 --> 00:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And so probably helps if I type the title not in Greek.</v>

00:26:16.640 --> 00:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to Romans 16.</v>

00:26:19.120 --> 00:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course we're talking about Phoebe.</v>

00:26:21.280 --> 00:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They love to bring up Phoebe because Phoebe is I see that</v>

00:26:25.600 --> 00:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>OBS has decided it would like to</v>

00:26:29.200 --> 00:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>make part of Logos disappear, so I'll fix that real quick here.</v>

00:26:33.520 --> 00:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There we go.</v>

00:26:35.360 --> 00:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church</v>

00:26:39.120 --> 00:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at Senkrea.</v>

00:26:40.560 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And then it goes on.</v>

00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Notably it doesn't say that she's teaching.</v>

00:26:46.080 --> 00:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't say that she's doing pastoral anything.</v>

00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, really all it says of her is that she is</v>

00:26:52.080 --> 00:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a servant of the church and that she is a patron of</v>

00:26:54.720 --> 00:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>many. That's later on in the same verse.</v>

00:26:57.520 --> 00:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Servant there is Diakonos.</v>

00:27:00.160 --> 00:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And we know it is feminine because of two things in Greek.</v>

00:27:03.520 --> 00:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>One it has to agree with Phoebe, of course, sister here is</v>

00:27:06.880 --> 00:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the feminine, because this isn't a positive.</v>

00:27:09.840 --> 00:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>This is describing this person.</v>

00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also the fact Greek participles, just a verb form,</v>

00:27:16.320 --> 00:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with the thing about which they the thing they're referencing.</v>

00:27:19.920 --> 00:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And so you have that here as well.</v>

00:27:22.800 --> 00:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So we know this is a feminine use of this word.</v>

00:27:25.920 --> 00:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>The only time it appears in the feminine doesn't say anything about</v>

00:27:31.040 --> 00:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>teaching or authority.</v>

00:27:32.880 --> 00:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It just means servant.</v>

00:27:34.480 --> 00:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Because if we go and look up the word here, I'll look</v>

00:27:37.200 --> 00:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it up in two just the two standard dictionaries, which is BDAG</v>

00:27:40.640 --> 00:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and LSJ.</v>

00:27:41.840 --> 00:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Diaconos, one who serves as an intermediary in a transaction, so that</v>

00:27:46.080 --> 00:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would be an agent.</v>

00:27:47.200 --> 00:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You have some uses in scripture.</v>

00:27:49.360 --> 00:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>One who gets something done at the behest of a superior, an</v>

00:27:53.200 --> 00:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>assistant. That's all a servant means.</v>

00:27:55.600 --> 00:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you can think of the men who were serving as</v>

00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>deacons. You have waiting tables and things like that as part of</v>

00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>their duties.</v>

00:28:02.640 --> 00:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They are servants of the church.</v>

00:28:04.560 --> 00:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>They are not in a position of leadership.</v>

00:28:07.360 --> 00:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not what you think of today when we think of deacon,</v>

00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because the way we've transformed it in English, the way we use</v>

00:28:14.000 --> 00:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it, is sort of an elder, a ruling elder in the church.</v>

00:28:17.360 --> 00:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It depends on your polity and how your church is organized, of</v>

00:28:20.480 --> 00:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>course, different churches are different.</v>

00:28:22.720 --> 00:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what we're dealing with in the case of the</v>

00:28:26.480 --> 00:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Greek. We're dealing with something completely different.</v>

00:28:29.920 --> 00:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And for some reason it decided not to pull that up for</v>

00:28:35.200 --> 00:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>all of you because it pulled it up in the wrong window.</v>

00:28:40.960 --> 00:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I love when Things cooperate.</v>

00:28:46.640 --> 00:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I want.</v>

00:28:48.880 --> 00:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Except for it disappeared again.</v>

00:28:57.920 --> 00:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Minor technical difficulties.</v>

00:29:03.600 --> 00:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, there's D Econ.</v>

00:29:08.240 --> 00:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I read the definition for you, so quite frankly, I don't need</v>

00:29:10.320 --> 00:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to have it on the screen.</v>

00:29:11.360 --> 00:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But the other one will just be LSJ.</v>

00:29:13.520 --> 00:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>See if I can get it to cooperate with this one.</v>

00:29:16.960 --> 00:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Logos seemingly opens in whatever window it feels like.</v>

00:29:20.400 --> 00:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>The same thing.</v>

00:29:21.840 --> 00:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Attendant, you can't have an official templar religious guild, that's an ancient</v>

00:29:25.120 --> 00:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Greek, we're dealing with Koina Greek here, so it's different.</v>

00:29:28.160 --> 00:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But servile, menial.</v>

00:29:30.560 --> 00:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Servant. You're dealing with a servant of the church.</v>

00:29:33.440 --> 00:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And so no, a deaconess is not a way for them to</v>

00:29:36.800 --> 00:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of bring women in via the back door to make them</v>

00:29:40.640 --> 00:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>into pastors and all but name, which is what is often done</v>

00:29:43.440 --> 00:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the churches.</v>

00:29:45.600 --> 00:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very clear what women are permitted to do in the churches</v>

00:29:48.800 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and what women are not permitted to do.</v>

00:29:50.240 --> 00:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>If it tells women they have to be silent in the churches,</v>

00:29:53.360 --> 00:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not teach, except children, other women, and not exercise authority over men.</v>

00:29:58.560 --> 00:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Well a deaconess can't be anything can't possibly be an office that</v>

00:30:02.880 --> 00:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can do those things.</v>

00:30:03.920 --> 00:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That would be a violation, and so that would be eisegesis instead</v>

00:30:07.280 --> 00:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of exegesis.</v>

00:30:09.040 --> 00:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We just say improper interpretation of scripture instead of proper interpretation.</v>

00:30:14.160 --> 00:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And it also speaks of typing in Greek again.</v>

00:30:17.520 --> 00:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It also speaks of what older women are supposed to do with</v>

00:30:20.480 --> 00:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>regard to younger women, right?</v>

00:30:21.760 --> 00:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>When it speaks of the older women, what are they supposed to</v>

00:30:24.560 --> 00:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>do? Older women, likewise, are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers</v>

00:30:30.880 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or slaves to much wine.</v>

00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>They are to teach what is good, and so train the young</v>

00:30:35.840 --> 00:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>women, here's the list for young women, to love their husbands and</v>

00:30:40.480 --> 00:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind and</v>

00:30:47.840 --> 00:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>submissive to their own husbands.</v>

00:30:50.880 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the list of what women are supposed to do.</v>

00:30:53.680 --> 00:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Anything incompatible with that list is not something women are supposed to</v>

00:30:57.280 --> 00:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing.</v>

00:30:58.400 --> 00:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's very clear what scripture teaches.</v>

00:31:00.800 --> 00:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Those who want to make deaconesses into a lesser office under pastor</v>

00:31:05.920 --> 00:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in the church and permit them to teach and exegete and even</v>

00:31:08.720 --> 00:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just read scripture in front of the congregation, things like that.</v>

00:31:12.720 --> 00:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are simply defying Scripture in order to shoehorn feminism into the church.</v>

00:31:18.960 --> 00:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>God is not a feminist.</v>

00:31:20.880 --> 00:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Scripture has feminism absolutely nowhere in it.</v>

00:31:24.640 --> 00:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You cannot possibly faithfully exegete scripture and turn it into a feminist</v>

00:31:30.640 --> 00:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>text. It tell again, it tells women to be silent in the</v>

00:31:33.920 --> 00:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>church. Not just not to teach, not just not to exercise authority,</v>

00:31:38.880 --> 00:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but not to speak.</v>

00:31:41.760 --> 00:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>If we just obeyed that command, a lot of these problems would</v>

00:31:45.120 --> 00:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>go away.</v>

00:31:46.000 --> 00:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Add to that the head coverings and you pretty much get the</v>

00:31:48.640 --> 00:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>right picture.</v>

00:31:50.400 --> 00:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So obviously yes, the answer to deaconesses is they should not be</v>

00:31:55.520 --> 00:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a thing A thing.</v>

00:31:57.200 --> 00:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>They're just not a thing.</v>

00:31:59.280 --> 00:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You can have women who are serving in certain roles in the</v>

00:32:03.040 --> 00:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>church, taking care of children, visiting the sick, the elderly, things like</v>

00:32:07.600 --> 00:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that. That's perfectly fine.</v>

00:32:09.200 --> 00:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a servant, which is the core sense of Diaconos, not a</v>

00:32:13.680 --> 00:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>leadership role, not exercising authority, because that's improper.</v>

00:32:17.200 --> 00:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>A woman is not her own head, she does not exercise authority.</v>

00:32:37.040 --> 00:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Go to I think this is the only other</v>

00:32:41.200 --> 00:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially exegetically heavy question.</v>

00:32:43.440 --> 00:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'll go into the exegesis as much on this</v>

00:32:46.160 --> 00:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>one. I've gone into it before and we've touched on it on</v>

00:32:48.720 --> 00:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Stone Choir, so I don't think I have to go into as</v>

00:32:52.240 --> 00:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>much of the exegesis here so much as just explaining the doctrine.</v>

00:32:56.320 --> 00:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>This is about atonement, basically limited atonement, the reformed conception versus the</v>

00:33:01.360 --> 00:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Lutheran conception of how these things work.</v>

00:33:04.160 --> 00:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>In the tenth chapter of John, Jesus says the good shepherd gives</v>

00:33:07.600 --> 00:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>his life for the sheep, and to the unbelievers Jesus says that</v>

00:33:11.520 --> 00:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they are not from his sheep.</v>

00:33:13.440 --> 00:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>True. How do Lutherans understand those passages where Christ mentions that he</v>

00:33:17.600 --> 00:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gives his life specifically for the sheep</v>

00:33:20.080 --> 00:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>or for the church, of which not all are part of?</v>

00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So basically the question is the difference between the Lutheran conception, which</v>

00:33:29.840 --> 00:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is the universal justification is the term we would typically use, unlimited</v>

00:33:35.600 --> 00:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>atonement is a fine way of describing it as well, versus the</v>

00:33:39.600 --> 00:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>reformed conception of limited atonement being the L in Tulip, right?</v>

00:33:45.760 --> 00:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:33:48.480 --> 00:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Lutheran breakdown, I'll go over the Lutheran view first.</v>

00:33:52.160 --> 00:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The Lutheran view is that there is the objective, also called the</v>

00:33:56.400 --> 00:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>universal justification, and the subjective, also called the personal, which subjective and</v>

00:34:02.000 --> 00:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>personal are basically the same word, but slight nuance there.</v>

00:34:05.840 --> 00:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>The subjective or personal justification.</v>

00:34:09.280 --> 00:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the objective justification is Christ's work in redeeming creation.</v>

00:34:16.800 --> 00:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Toncosman in the words of John three sixteen, because it says</v>

00:34:21.200 --> 00:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he redeemed all things, right?</v>

00:34:23.040 --> 00:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>For God so loved the world, Toncosman, and incidentally the same word</v>

00:34:27.120 --> 00:34:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for universe, which is all things that exist in the Greek mind</v>

00:34:32.000 --> 00:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>In the original Greek, that's what it means.</v>

00:34:34.480 --> 00:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So he redeemed the world because it is creation that is groaning</v>

00:34:38.720 --> 00:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>together for the coming Messiah, for the restoration, for the renewal of</v>

00:34:42.320 --> 00:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>all things.</v>

00:34:43.200 --> 00:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just mankind, it's literally everything.</v>

00:34:46.400 --> 00:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the mountains, it's rivers, its trees, it's all of creation is</v>

00:34:50.560 --> 00:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>awaiting the renewal of all things.</v>

00:34:52.960 --> 00:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that of course is what Christ redeemed in his perfect</v>

00:34:56.400 --> 00:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>work. He made satisfaction for all sins.</v>

00:35:00.080 --> 00:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>He redeemed all things.</v>

00:35:02.560 --> 00:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The issue for human beings, because of course we are made in</v>

00:35:05.840 --> 00:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the image of God, we're moral agents, we're the most relevant thing</v>

00:35:09.760 --> 00:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in this.</v>

00:35:10.640 --> 00:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We are, of course, descendants of Adam, Adam being the pinnacle of</v>

00:35:14.800 --> 00:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>creation, the head of creation, which is why all of creation fell</v>

00:35:18.400 --> 00:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in Adam, because it fell in its head.</v>

00:35:20.800 --> 00:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Not an Eve, but an Adam.</v>

00:35:23.840 --> 00:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The issue of how</v>

00:35:25.840 --> 00:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>justification is applied is the distinction here.</v>

00:35:30.160 --> 00:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>All things are redeemed in Christ, but only those who are in</v>

00:35:35.600 --> 00:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Christ by faith are themselves redeemed in the sense of going to</v>

00:35:40.800 --> 00:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>paradise instead of hell.</v>

00:35:42.640 --> 00:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That is the subjective justification which takes place by the means of</v>

00:35:46.960 --> 00:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>grace, which bestow faith, which is the means by which the instrumental</v>

00:35:51.040 --> 00:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>means, by which God applies salvation the atonement to you, by which</v>

00:35:56.800 --> 00:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you personally subjectively are justified.</v>

00:36:00.800 --> 00:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>That is the, I would say, the teaching of Scripture, and it</v>

00:36:03.680 --> 00:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is the Lutheran position on the justification.</v>

00:36:07.440 --> 00:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Someone brought up a hymn, of course, which is always good to</v>

00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>see. So</v>

00:36:12.880 --> 00:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>all things are redeemed in Christ, the scope of the atonement is</v>

00:36:17.600 --> 00:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>unlimited because it is universal in the fullest sense.</v>

00:36:21.360 --> 00:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>All sins are erased in Christ.</v>

00:36:23.520 --> 00:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Because of course, Christ's payment was of infinite value, so it atoned</v>

00:36:28.560 --> 00:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for all things, being infinite.</v>

00:36:31.760 --> 00:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But it has to be applied to you by faith for you</v>

00:36:36.560 --> 00:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to be saved by it.</v>

00:36:38.640 --> 00:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Which is to say, all of those in hell, their sins have</v>

00:36:43.120 --> 00:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>been forgiven.</v>

00:36:44.960 --> 00:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>They do not benefit from it because they are not in Christ.</v>

00:36:49.200 --> 00:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The reformed understanding, on the other hand, what they do, and I</v>

00:36:54.320 --> 00:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>won't necessarily get deep into Thingli and Aleosis and all that stuff</v>

00:36:58.480 --> 00:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's not really the point of the question.</v>

00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Kind of is, but at the same time.</v>

00:37:04.000 --> 00:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Their view is called limited atonement.</v>

00:37:07.120 --> 00:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So they believe that Christ died for the elect and for no</v>

00:37:12.080 --> 00:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one else.</v>

00:37:13.200 --> 00:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Not for those who are in hell.</v>

00:37:15.200 --> 00:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason they argue for this, and I'll sort of steel man</v>

00:37:17.840 --> 00:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>their position, and then tear it down, but</v>

00:37:22.320 --> 00:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The reason they argue for that is because they think, or at</v>

00:37:25.920 --> 00:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>least they advance, that it is an insult to Christ, in the</v>

00:37:30.480 --> 00:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sense that his work was not effective for some of those</v>

00:37:36.480 --> 00:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Who would it be included in it in the Lutheran and the</v>

00:37:39.520 --> 00:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>view of others as well?</v>

00:37:41.200 --> 00:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Because if they are not saved, then it seems like Christ failed,</v>

00:37:44.880 --> 00:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>right? We Lutherans don't view it as Christ having failed.</v>

00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>It's rather some reject the free gift of faith.</v>

00:37:53.440 --> 00:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a different thing.</v>

00:37:55.520 --> 00:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Christ achieved the atonement perfectly in his life, in his work, in</v>

00:38:00.880 --> 00:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>his death.</v>

00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Christ achieved the atonement, the redemption of all things.</v>

00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Just because some people elect not to benefit from it, because some</v>

00:38:11.440 --> 00:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>people reject the free gift of faith does not mean that Christ</v>

00:38:15.440 --> 00:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>failed. It means those people are wicked.</v>

00:38:18.080 --> 00:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what that actually means.</v>

00:38:20.720 --> 00:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We think the other problem with what the Reformed contend is that</v>

00:38:25.200 --> 00:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it does not address all of the verses that speak of Christ</v>

00:38:28.560 --> 00:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>having renewed and restored and redeemed all things.</v>

00:38:32.640 --> 00:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't say he redeemed the elect alone.</v>

00:38:36.560 --> 00:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, in John three sixteen, we're dealing with the ton</v>

00:38:39.840 --> 00:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>cosmon, we're dealing with the universe, which is again all things that</v>

00:38:44.880 --> 00:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>exist. I don't think they can deal with those verses.</v>

00:38:48.160 --> 00:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that Swingli talks about his aliosis, which basically means you</v>

00:38:52.000 --> 00:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>change the object when</v>

00:38:54.960 --> 00:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get too deep in the grammar here, but</v>

00:38:57.120 --> 00:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's basically you change the target of what the verse is saying</v>

00:39:02.240 --> 00:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to align with the fact that it can't possibly mean</v>

00:39:05.680 --> 00:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>all, it has to mean all in the sense of all the</v>

00:39:08.800 --> 00:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>elect. I find that to be an impermissible alteration of what scripture</v>

00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>says. I read all things and I believe it means all things.</v>

00:39:19.120 --> 00:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the difference, and so to go to the passage that he</v>

00:39:24.080 --> 00:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to specifically have addressed, of course we're dealing with John here.</v>

00:39:31.600 --> 00:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I will pull that up on screen.</v>

00:39:36.720 --> 00:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so John ten eleven.</v>

00:39:38.320 --> 00:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I am the good shepherd.</v>

00:39:39.440 --> 00:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.</v>

00:39:42.320 --> 00:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And then of course it goes on with he use a hired</v>

00:39:44.400 --> 00:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hand versus the shepherd, the hired hand runs away, the the good</v>

00:39:47.200 --> 00:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>shepherd will actually fight for the sheep.</v>

00:39:49.360 --> 00:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And then down to verse twenty-six I told you and you do</v>

00:39:53.600 --> 00:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not believe, the works that I do in my Father's name bear</v>

00:39:56.320 --> 00:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>witness about me, but you do not believe because you are not</v>

00:39:59.600 --> 00:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>among my sheep.</v>

00:40:01.840 --> 00:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And so the Lutheran interpretation of this is this is dealing with</v>

00:40:05.600 --> 00:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that subjective justification.</v>

00:40:07.520 --> 00:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>This is also pastoral in a sense, Christ is acting in a</v>

00:40:12.560 --> 00:40:14.720
<v Speaker 1>way as a pastor here.</v>

00:40:14.720 --> 00:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it is a distinction from dealing with Christ's work of</v>

00:40:19.840 --> 00:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the atonement itself versus the application of that atonement.</v>

00:40:24.400 --> 00:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We take this passage to mean the application of the atonement to</v>

00:40:27.920 --> 00:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>individuals, and they are called not his sheep, because they are not</v>

00:40:31.680 --> 00:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>among the elect, they do not believe, they do not have faith.</v>

00:40:35.680 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That would be the distinction there.</v>

00:40:36.960 --> 00:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He's dealing with the sheep versus the goats.</v>

00:40:38.720 --> 00:40:39.760
<v Speaker 1>These are goats.</v>

00:40:39.760 --> 00:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So they're not his sheep.</v>

00:40:41.600 --> 00:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Their sins are forgiven, but they do not believe, and so they</v>

00:40:45.520 --> 00:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>do not benefit.</v>

00:40:46.640 --> 00:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>An example that is sometimes used that isn't exactly identical, but it</v>

00:40:51.200 --> 00:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is good enough to get the point across.</v>

00:40:53.440 --> 00:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>If I put a million dollars in a bank account, and then</v>

00:40:56.640 --> 00:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I gave you a debit card and the PIN, and then you</v>

00:41:00.640 --> 00:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stick it in your desk and forget about it, or you say</v>

00:41:03.040 --> 00:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe you, or you shred it.</v>

00:41:05.840 --> 00:41:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, the million dollars is still there, but you don't benefit from</v>

00:41:10.240 --> 00:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it. Because of your actions, because of, in this case your foolishness,</v>

00:41:14.560 --> 00:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but with regard to sin because of your wickedness.</v>

00:41:17.600 --> 00:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the distinction there.</v>

00:41:18.960 --> 00:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And so we don't find that there's any conflict, it's just dealing</v>

00:41:22.640 --> 00:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with different aspects of the doctrine, the objective slash universal versus the</v>

00:41:27.920 --> 00:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>subjective slash personal</v>

00:41:43.280 --> 00:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll probably get to at least uh two or three</v>

00:41:46.320 --> 00:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>more questions here.</v>

00:41:47.120 --> 00:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I will get a drink of tea first.</v>

00:41:51.120 --> 00:41:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I know someone said the teapot was stealing the show, which it</v>

00:41:55.120 --> 00:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>does add to the ambiance, so it is.</v>

00:41:58.560 --> 00:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time it's nice to have tea.</v>

00:42:00.960 --> 00:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So and it does stay warm that way.</v>

00:42:05.520 --> 00:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Let that cool slightly.</v>

00:42:19.200 --> 00:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about in the chat about keeping the Sabbath.</v>

00:42:25.920 --> 00:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That one I would probably as a Lutheran obviously, I'm just going</v>

00:42:29.760 --> 00:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to the catechism, but</v>

00:42:32.560 --> 00:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you can also just go, of course, to the words of Christ,</v>

00:42:37.440 --> 00:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the</v>

00:42:40.720 --> 00:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Sabbath. You would start there, and then you could point out also</v>

00:42:44.400 --> 00:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that he brings up David.</v>

00:42:45.760 --> 00:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>David broke the Sabbath, in fact he broke several rules when he</v>

00:42:48.560 --> 00:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ate the bread of the presents and did things like that.</v>

00:42:50.960 --> 00:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fact that the priests who served in the</v>

00:42:53.280 --> 00:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>temple profaned the Sabbath, but they were not guilty because of that</v>

00:42:57.040 --> 00:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fact.</v>

00:42:58.240 --> 00:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The point of the Sabbath, the keeping of a day of rest,</v>

00:43:04.080 --> 00:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is not just to</v>

00:43:06.880 --> 00:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do nothing.</v>

00:43:08.000 --> 00:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Right? That's the Jewish interpretation.</v>

00:43:09.920 --> 00:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>They think, oh, I can't possibly do anything.</v>

00:43:12.080 --> 00:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I have to just sit and do nothing and I have to</v>

00:43:14.880 --> 00:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>set up my oven so that it turns on on its own</v>

00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and all the weird little things they do to try to Jew</v>

00:43:20.560 --> 00:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>God, which is what they're doing.</v>

00:43:22.480 --> 00:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Right. That's not what the Sabbath is.</v>

00:43:26.000 --> 00:43:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it keeps trying to change the resolution on</v>

00:43:28.720 --> 00:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>my browser here, but I will just go full screen on it</v>

00:43:32.640 --> 00:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>instead and absolve the problem there.</v>

00:43:34.880 --> 00:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So what is the third commandment?</v>

00:43:36.400 --> 00:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course, the Lutheran numbering, the Augustinian numbering, the traditional numbering,</v>

00:43:40.400 --> 00:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>those who are of reform persuasion or whatever can remember it in</v>

00:43:43.840 --> 00:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>their head.</v>

00:43:44.720 --> 00:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Thou shalt sanctify the holy day.</v>

00:43:46.960 --> 00:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean?</v>

00:43:48.320 --> 00:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We should fear and love God that we may not despise preaching</v>

00:43:51.520 --> 00:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in his word, but hold it sacred and gladly hear and learn</v>

00:43:55.840 --> 00:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it. That's part of the observation of the Sabbath, that is, the</v>

00:44:00.480 --> 00:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>small catechism, of course, is meant to be a summary, it's meant</v>

00:44:04.080 --> 00:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to be enough for people so that they can understand the core</v>

00:44:10.080 --> 00:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Christian faith and be a Christian.</v>

00:44:11.920 --> 00:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You can be saved if you know just what is in the</v>

00:44:13.920 --> 00:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>small catechism.</v>

00:44:15.920 --> 00:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But there is more to it, and of course that's why we</v>

00:44:18.160 --> 00:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have the large catechism.</v>

00:44:19.520 --> 00:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I won't read all of it because the large catechism is in</v>

00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fact longer.</v>

00:44:23.440 --> 00:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So I would recommend you go and look at that.</v>

00:44:25.600 --> 00:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I will put that in the show notes as well.</v>

00:44:27.520 --> 00:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But it goes over more of it because part of the point</v>

00:44:32.080 --> 00:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Sabbath is it's a day of rest.</v>

00:44:35.600 --> 00:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You can see that clearly in the fact that it's compared to</v>

00:44:38.080 --> 00:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that God rested.</v>

00:44:40.960 --> 00:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Man is supposed to rest as well.</v>

00:44:43.200 --> 00:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The biggest part of that, and Luther goes into this in the</v>

00:44:45.840 --> 00:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>large catechism and elsewhere, staunch Christians who have you know an unshakable</v>

00:44:52.640 --> 00:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>faith, and particularly those who are of upper class, as ri and</v>

00:44:57.760 --> 00:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll see why that's relevant, don't really need a Sabbath.</v>

00:45:01.920 --> 00:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't really need a day of rest.</v>

00:45:04.640 --> 00:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Servants, the working class today, those who</v>

00:45:08.640 --> 00:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have a day in, day out, perhaps a grueling job, need to</v>

00:45:13.600 --> 00:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have time off.</v>

00:45:14.960 --> 00:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Human beings were not meant to work twenty four seven no matter</v>

00:45:18.480 --> 00:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what capitalism may tell you.</v>

00:45:20.560 --> 00:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it is vitally important to give your workers a day</v>

00:45:24.400 --> 00:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>off. God is going to judge harshly those employers who drive their</v>

00:45:30.160 --> 00:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>employees too hard.</v>

00:45:32.480 --> 00:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You are supposed to treat them well, and just because they're called</v>

00:45:36.000 --> 00:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>employees today instead of slaves or servants or whatever term you want</v>

00:45:40.320 --> 00:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to use doesn't change the reality of the relationship, you still have</v>

00:45:44.960 --> 00:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that position of authority and duty to those people under you, even</v>

00:45:48.640 --> 00:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are simply paying them an hourly wage.</v>

00:45:51.520 --> 00:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't think that your duties end when you sign that check.</v>

00:45:55.120 --> 00:45:57.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not the end of it before God.</v>

00:45:57.440 --> 00:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So it is necessary</v>

00:45:59.440 --> 00:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to observe these things, but it is not a matter of some</v>

00:46:02.560 --> 00:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the examples given here, right?</v>

00:46:04.560 --> 00:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You can particularly think of the things the Jews will do.</v>

00:46:07.360 --> 00:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I can think of one particularly salient example that may make the</v>

00:46:11.360 --> 00:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>point for some of you.</v>

00:46:13.200 --> 00:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>There is a website that has been retailing and it's got a</v>

00:46:18.000 --> 00:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>physical location.</v>

00:46:18.720 --> 00:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's in New York.</v>

00:46:21.120 --> 00:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Mostly camera gear, but a lot of Mac stuff as well and</v>

00:46:24.800 --> 00:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of high end electronics and things like that for many</v>

00:46:27.440 --> 00:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>years. Very well known site, used by particularly people in the photography</v>

00:46:32.000 --> 00:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>industry, but also Apple users and others.</v>

00:46:34.160 --> 00:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's BH Photo, I don't mind naming them.</v>

00:46:36.880 --> 00:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Their website is offline for orders on Saturdays because they're Jewish.</v>

00:46:42.880 --> 00:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>They think that's obeying the Sabbath.</v>

00:46:44.800 --> 00:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They're giving their server servers don't need a rest.</v>

00:46:48.320 --> 00:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Servers don't get tired.</v>

00:46:50.560 --> 00:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Servers break down when their hardware fails, but the Sabbath is not</v>

00:46:55.920 --> 00:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for that.</v>

00:46:56.640 --> 00:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The rest aspect of it is for human beings and animals.</v>

00:47:01.040 --> 00:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Not for your server, not for your electricity, not for your gas</v>

00:47:05.120 --> 00:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or the physical road or anything like that.</v>

00:47:07.840 --> 00:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You give your animals a rest if you have farm animals or</v>

00:47:11.680 --> 00:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>other beasts of burden.</v>

00:47:13.440 --> 00:47:16.800
<v Speaker 1>There are things that you do that are an aspect of rest,</v>

00:47:16.800 --> 00:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the other part of it, as was pointed out in the small</v>

00:47:19.040 --> 00:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>catechism, is that it's a day set aside in order to have</v>

00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>some time to learn the word of the Lord, to listen to</v>

00:47:26.320 --> 00:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>preaching, to listen to teaching, and the reason that that ties into</v>

00:47:29.920 --> 00:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>other things here is because those who do not have the amount</v>

00:47:33.600 --> 00:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of free time that the upper class has because the upper class</v>

00:47:36.800 --> 00:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>has more leisure time.</v>

00:47:37.920 --> 00:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>That's just the reality of how the world works.</v>

00:47:40.560 --> 00:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The working class has less leisure time.</v>

00:47:43.120 --> 00:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Particularly historically, today it's a little different in some cases, but that</v>

00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>time needs to be set aside to come together and learn the</v>

00:47:51.040 --> 00:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>word of the Lord.</v>

00:47:52.160 --> 00:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also a matter of good order, because if you just showed</v>

00:47:55.920 --> 00:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up to church at whatever time and day you felt like, probably</v>

00:47:59.680 --> 00:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to work very well if everyone does that.</v>

00:48:02.000 --> 00:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You kind of need a time and a place.</v>

00:48:04.560 --> 00:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>There are different aspects of obeying the Sabbath, of sanctifying the holy</v>

00:48:09.120 --> 00:48:12.320
<v Speaker 1>day, as it says in the small catechism.</v>

00:48:12.320 --> 00:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a matter of just not doing a bunch of things.</v>

00:48:16.960 --> 00:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not just take a nap.</v>

00:48:19.680 --> 00:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not what the Jews think it is where like I said</v>

00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>before, your oven has to have a weird timer and Sabbath mode</v>

00:48:26.240 --> 00:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and all these things and maybe you can turn on lights or</v>

00:48:28.880 --> 00:48:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't turn on lights.</v>

00:48:29.760 --> 00:48:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That's completely ridiculous.</v>

00:48:31.280 --> 00:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Which is what Christ points out to them when he says who</v>

00:48:33.600 --> 00:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't pull his ox out of a well?</v>

00:48:36.560 --> 00:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Come on, it's ridiculous how they were doing it.</v>

00:48:39.440 --> 00:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>He mocks them for it because it's so dumb.</v>

00:48:42.480 --> 00:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not what the Sabbath is for.</v>

00:48:44.560 --> 00:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It is for something completely different, and Christ is Lord of the</v>

00:48:49.120 --> 00:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Sabbath, and again the Sabbath was made for man, not man for</v>

00:48:52.320 --> 00:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sabbath.</v>

00:48:53.040 --> 00:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So observing it is not a matter of just not doing certain</v>

00:48:57.360 --> 00:49:00.400
<v Speaker 1>things. It is a matter of resting, it's a matter of listening</v>

00:49:00.400 --> 00:49:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to the word of the Lord, it's a matter of treating those</v>

00:49:03.760 --> 00:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>entrusted to your care, whether men or animals, well, giving them rest</v>

00:49:08.000 --> 00:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it's all of these things in one, but not in a legalistic</v>

00:49:12.160 --> 00:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>way. Now, that being said, do I believe we should take that</v>

00:49:17.600 --> 00:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>commandment more seriously than we currently do as a society?</v>

00:49:20.560 --> 00:49:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The answer is absolutely yes.</v>

00:49:22.720 --> 00:49:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we should go back to having almost everything closed on</v>

00:49:26.320 --> 00:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Sundays. I think we should go back to having those sorts of</v>

00:49:30.480 --> 00:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>restrictions in place, not selling alcohol, things like that.</v>

00:49:34.560 --> 00:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You should plan ahead for your communion wine.</v>

00:49:36.640 --> 00:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't have to run out on Sunday morning.</v>

00:49:39.600 --> 00:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be good for our society to do that.</v>

00:49:42.560 --> 00:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's good not just socially, I think it would be good religiously,</v>

00:49:45.440 --> 00:49:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it would be truer to the commandment.</v>

00:49:48.720 --> 00:49:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And no, I don't think there's anything wrong with the fact that</v>

00:49:51.280 --> 00:49:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we observe it on Sunday.</v>

00:49:52.400 --> 00:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>The reason we do it is because that's what the ancient church</v>

00:49:55.440 --> 00:50:00.720
<v Speaker 1>did, and because Christ rose on Sunday, we're celebrating the fact that</v>

00:50:00.720 --> 00:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a Savior who rose from the dead, and that one</v>

00:50:03.440 --> 00:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>day we will do the same.</v>

00:50:04.400 --> 00:50:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's appropriate to do it on the day he rose from</v>

00:50:06.960 --> 00:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the dead.</v>

00:50:08.000 --> 00:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course, yes, I pointed out before that you can't really</v>

00:50:11.920 --> 00:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trace back and say that, oh, this day of our week is</v>

00:50:16.160 --> 00:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that day of the week in their calendar.</v>

00:50:18.880 --> 00:50:21.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't have that sort of resolution, a historical record, so you</v>

00:50:21.760 --> 00:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>literally can't trace back to the exact day of the week on</v>

00:50:26.640 --> 00:50:28.320
<v Speaker 1>which God rested.</v>

00:50:28.320 --> 00:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't do it.</v>

00:50:29.520 --> 00:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>To say nothing of the fact that you have the problems of</v>

00:50:32.400 --> 00:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the calendar and the problems of the Earth going round the sun,</v>

00:50:35.760 --> 00:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>which is not an exact number.</v>

00:50:37.440 --> 00:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Right? That's why we have leap years and the formula is not</v>

00:50:41.440 --> 00:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just every four years, it's much more complicated than that.</v>

00:50:44.560 --> 00:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So you literally can't figure out when Saturday was in Creation Week.</v>

00:50:51.200 --> 00:50:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So God is not going to give you a command that is</v>

00:50:54.080 --> 00:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>quite literally impossible.</v>

00:50:56.480 --> 00:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>He's going to give you one that you can aspire to and</v>

00:50:59.520 --> 00:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe not reach the standard because of course, for instance, all of</v>

00:51:02.880 --> 00:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the commandments are aspirational in a sense, because in a fallen world</v>

00:51:06.480 --> 00:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the way we live today we can't possibly reach them.</v>

00:51:09.520 --> 00:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those things where</v>

00:51:12.560 --> 00:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you just can or can't, and you literally cannot hear.</v>

00:51:15.760 --> 00:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't figure out when Saturday was in Creation Week, and so</v>

00:51:18.640 --> 00:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday is the day that we have picked as a civilization.</v>

00:51:21.840 --> 00:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We've picked it for very good reasons.</v>

00:51:23.520 --> 00:51:26.240
<v Speaker 1>We've adhered to it for centuries.</v>

00:51:26.240 --> 00:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We should continue to do so.</v>

00:51:27.920 --> 00:51:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It is appropriate to do so, so I'm answering sort of the</v>

00:51:30.320 --> 00:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>sabbatarian question at the same time.</v>

00:51:33.120 --> 00:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That is an important aspect of Christendom, having the Having this day,</v>

00:51:37.760 --> 00:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this universal day of rest and worship of the Lord.</v>

00:51:42.560 --> 00:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an important part of our culture we've sort</v>

00:51:45.120 --> 00:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of let slip away.</v>

00:51:46.480 --> 00:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We let capitalism erode it.</v>

00:51:48.480 --> 00:51:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We decided that being able to have the convenience of buying things</v>

00:51:52.080 --> 00:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>whenever we feel like it and going out and doing all these</v>

00:51:55.040 --> 00:52:00.400
<v Speaker 1>things on every day outweighed obedience to God.</v>

00:52:00.400 --> 00:52:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I think we should take it more seriously, but again,</v>

00:52:03.280 --> 00:52:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not a legalistic thing.</v>

00:52:05.760 --> 00:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just a desire to, as Christians, obey God.</v>

00:52:10.880 --> 00:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Having been renewed by the Spirit, we should participate, again, synergistically, in</v>

00:52:16.640 --> 00:52:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sanctification. Part of that is obeying the commandments as best we can.</v>

00:52:20.720 --> 00:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we could do a better job as a society, as</v>

00:52:23.520 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a civilization, with the third commandment.</v>

00:52:26.880 --> 00:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Or whatever number you want to use in your system.</v>

00:52:30.080 --> 00:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to actually finally drink my tea now.</v>

00:52:45.920 --> 00:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a Roman Catholic who thanks me for the work that</v>

00:52:49.200 --> 00:52:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I've done and offered to buy me a pint.</v>

00:52:50.720 --> 00:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>As a German I'm obligated to accept, so Trappist is always good,</v>

00:52:56.320 --> 00:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I do like those beers as well.</v>

00:52:58.080 --> 00:53:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I am, of course, partial to the German beers, but there are</v>

00:53:00.720 --> 00:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of other good ones from Europe and elsewhere.</v>

00:53:03.600 --> 00:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Certainly US has good beer now as well.</v>

00:53:07.120 --> 00:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Think I'll get a couple more questions here.</v>

00:53:09.680 --> 00:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's see.</v>

00:53:13.440 --> 00:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about answering this one next time, but I think</v>

00:53:16.960 --> 00:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I will answer it now a question from formerly Twitter now X</v>

00:53:22.160 --> 00:53:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Most black African Christians I have met or seen online seem to</v>

00:53:26.240 --> 00:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be far more strongly against witchcraft, the demonic Harry Potter, and such,</v>

00:53:30.640 --> 00:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>than other Europeans.</v>

00:53:32.560 --> 00:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Than Europeans, rather.</v>

00:53:34.400 --> 00:53:38.320
<v Speaker 1>How does this fit with the idea that syncretism is rife in</v>

00:53:38.320 --> 00:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Africa? I would start off by saying part of it is selection</v>

00:53:42.320 --> 00:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bias, because statistically, if you run the statistical analysis with the available</v>

00:53:47.120 --> 00:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>data, syncretism is much more of a problem in Africa.</v>

00:53:50.640 --> 00:53:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Just it simply is.</v>

00:53:52.640 --> 00:53:55.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of good books that go over that.</v>

00:53:55.920 --> 00:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me see if I can remember one.</v>

00:53:57.360 --> 00:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>There's. I think it's called I Am Not Afraid.</v>

00:54:02.880 --> 00:54:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a book specifically from a Lutheran perspective.</v>

00:54:07.840 --> 00:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is.</v>

00:54:08.640 --> 00:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It is I Am Not Afraid, Demon Possession and spiritual warfare.</v>

00:54:12.560 --> 00:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in the subject, probably worth grabbing to read it.</v>

00:54:16.640 --> 00:54:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You can probably get it cheaper on Amazon than directly from CPH,</v>

00:54:19.840 --> 00:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but find it used, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:54:22.560 --> 00:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Find a PDF.</v>

00:54:24.400 --> 00:54:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But it deals with the issue of how rife and rampant syncretism</v>

00:54:30.240 --> 00:54:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is, particularly in this case in the Malagasy Church, the Madagascar Lutheran</v>

00:54:34.720 --> 00:54:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Church. Since this is something that Lutherans have been combating over there,</v>

00:54:38.640 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And you have this syncretism with their traditional sort of ancestor worship</v>

00:54:44.480 --> 00:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>slash animist religion.</v>

00:54:47.760 --> 00:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>That is a problem that is basically universal in Africa.</v>

00:54:51.680 --> 00:54:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, some countries are worse than others.</v>

00:54:54.640 --> 00:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ethiopia is better in some ways, Ethiopia has been Christian</v>

00:54:58.400 --> 00:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>longer. Ethiopia had trade and a relationship with Old Testament Israel, so</v>

00:55:04.640 --> 00:55:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they've had access to some parts of Christianity much longer than others,</v>

00:55:09.360 --> 00:55:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that has benefited them.</v>

00:55:10.720 --> 00:55:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So they are better off in some ways.</v>

00:55:12.800 --> 00:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Still not great, if you look at the violent crime rates and</v>

00:55:15.520 --> 00:55:16.800
<v Speaker 1>things like that.</v>

00:55:16.800 --> 00:55:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But insofar as syncretism is concerned, it is much more of a</v>

00:55:22.320 --> 00:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>problem</v>

00:55:23.520 --> 00:55:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in the third world, and it's not just Africa, but Africa is</v>

00:55:26.880 --> 00:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the one that stands out, than it is in the Western world.</v>

00:55:31.040 --> 00:55:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's not to say the Western world doesn't have problems.</v>

00:55:33.760 --> 00:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We have plenty of apostasy and atheism and yes, witchcraft and things</v>

00:55:38.400 --> 00:55:39.280
<v Speaker 1>like that.</v>

00:55:39.280 --> 00:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>There are probably more witches in the Northeast of the United States</v>

00:55:44.160 --> 00:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and there are Lutherans, for instance.</v>

00:55:46.400 --> 00:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a very real problem.</v>

00:55:48.320 --> 00:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That's something we have to address.</v>

00:55:50.400 --> 00:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But syncretism specifically is not a big problem that we have.</v>

00:55:56.160 --> 00:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We have plenty of</v>

00:55:57.840 --> 00:55:58.720
<v Speaker 1>other problems.</v>

00:55:58.720 --> 00:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We have corruption of doctrines.</v>

00:56:00.880 --> 00:56:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We have liberalism.</v>

00:56:02.720 --> 00:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>We have all these things that creep into the churches, but it's</v>

00:56:06.160 --> 00:56:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not really syncretistic practice that is a problem.</v>

00:56:09.040 --> 00:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really rank apostasy in many cases instead.</v>

00:56:12.800 --> 00:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Which you can argue if that's better or worse.</v>

00:56:15.200 --> 00:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It's better in some ways, it's worse than others.</v>

00:56:17.440 --> 00:56:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of how difficult it is it is to</v>

00:56:19.760 --> 00:56:26.320
<v Speaker 1>surmount that in an individual case, but syncretism specifically is more of</v>

00:56:26.320 --> 00:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem in the third world.</v>

00:56:29.200 --> 00:56:34.480
<v Speaker 1>In these places that are much closer to their ancestral religions, so-called,</v>

00:56:34.480 --> 00:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because of course the ancestral religion of everyone is Christianity.</v>

00:56:38.000 --> 00:56:41.760
<v Speaker 1>When Noah's three sons walked off the ark, they were Christians.</v>

00:56:41.760 --> 00:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>There were some problems with Ham, but at least he knew the</v>

00:56:44.560 --> 00:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>doctrine, at least he knew the gospel.</v>

00:56:46.960 --> 00:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That had been passed down.</v>

00:56:49.840 --> 00:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So that is the ancestral religion of all men, but these corruptions</v>

00:56:54.160 --> 00:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that crept in and became their quote unquote ancestral religions, they are</v>

00:56:59.920 --> 00:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>much closer to that practice in the third world than in the</v>

00:57:03.840 --> 00:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Western world, because we have that separation that was Christendom.</v>

00:57:08.000 --> 00:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It has since decayed, unfortunately, and collapsed, but it at least gives</v>

00:57:12.480 --> 00:57:14.240
<v Speaker 1>us a separation from those practices.</v>

00:57:14.240 --> 00:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And in many cases, the pagan practices of our ancestors have been</v>

00:57:18.160 --> 00:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>lost. We can't even restore them.</v>

00:57:20.720 --> 00:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Th those in the third world have a continuity because it's still</v>

00:57:23.680 --> 00:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>practiced in many places.</v>

00:57:25.520 --> 00:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So they can go right back to it because shamans are still</v>

00:57:28.880 --> 00:57:32.160
<v Speaker 1>around in Africa and elsewhere.</v>

00:57:32.160 --> 00:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So they have that problem and we have different problems.</v>

00:57:37.120 --> 00:57:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Another aspect of it is also that they</v>

00:57:41.200 --> 00:57:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have exposure to it in a way that we don't.</v>

00:57:45.040 --> 00:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>You have witches who call themselves witches in the West, but really</v>

00:57:49.120 --> 00:57:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it's usually just weird women who collect crystals</v>

00:57:52.800 --> 00:57:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not good.</v>

00:57:54.400 --> 00:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of times they do engage in things that are</v>

00:57:57.360 --> 00:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>at least verging on the demonic, but usually it's a LARP.</v>

00:58:01.360 --> 00:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Usually they believe in energies and collect crystals and burn sage.</v>

00:58:06.400 --> 00:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's not good.</v>

00:58:09.440 --> 00:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's not the same thing as open demon worship.</v>

00:58:13.280 --> 00:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of them engage in demon worship, absolutely.</v>

00:58:16.800 --> 00:58:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of them engage in rank, awful demon worship, things that would</v>

00:58:21.360 --> 00:58:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be criminal if they were caught doing them.</v>

00:58:23.920 --> 00:58:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely that happens even here in the United States.</v>

00:58:27.840 --> 00:58:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:58:29.440 --> 00:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they have sort of created</v>

00:58:32.320 --> 00:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>their own new religion because that stuff didn't survive the filter of</v>

00:58:38.080 --> 00:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Christendom. Whereas again, the older practices in the other parts of the</v>

00:58:43.280 --> 00:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>world, Africa in particular, but also in some parts of South America,</v>

00:58:47.520 --> 00:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you have this syncretism because the old religions from which they converted</v>

00:58:52.480 --> 00:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>never died.</v>

00:58:53.680 --> 00:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They never disappeared.</v>

00:58:55.040 --> 00:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The practice has never stopped.</v>

00:58:57.040 --> 00:59:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You've had voodoo going on in Haiti since you had people in</v>

00:59:00.880 --> 00:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Haiti, who brought voodoo with them from Africa, of course.</v>

00:59:04.800 --> 00:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The original inhabitants practiced other things that were also demonic.</v>

00:59:08.560 --> 00:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why you have that problem there.</v>

00:59:11.440 --> 00:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But that fact that they don't have the separation means that they</v>

00:59:15.840 --> 00:59:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have more of a reaction to it when they convert.</v>

00:59:19.440 --> 00:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Because they have converted away from that thing, then sometimes they recognize</v>

00:59:24.960 --> 00:59:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the evil of the thing that they gave up, the thing from</v>

00:59:28.400 --> 00:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>which they fled, the thing from which they were rescued.</v>

00:59:31.600 --> 00:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And for a lot of Europeans, a lot of those in the</v>

00:59:34.560 --> 00:59:37.920
<v Speaker 1>West, We don't have that anymore.</v>

00:59:37.920 --> 00:59:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Because we take for granted all of the good things that Christendom</v>

00:59:42.240 --> 00:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gave us, all the things we inherited from our faithful Christian ancestors,</v>

00:59:47.280 --> 00:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are those who don't recognize</v>

00:59:50.560 --> 00:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>what they have, what their patrimony is, and so they don't have</v>

00:59:54.800 --> 00:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the same reaction to seeing evil because they have not had to</v>

00:59:58.800 --> 01:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>deal with it in the same way as those who have lived</v>

01:00:01.280 --> 01:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in places that Cases where shamanism and human sacrifice and things like</v>

01:00:05.680 --> 01:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that are still practiced, even if in the shadows in some cases.</v>

01:00:10.320 --> 01:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That is a problem for us to overcome in the West.</v>

01:00:13.760 --> 01:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a problem for them in that they have the syncretistic tendency.</v>

01:00:17.600 --> 01:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a problem for us in that people think that water doesn't</v>

01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>exist when there are fish swimming in that water.</v>

01:00:23.840 --> 01:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's different challenges.</v>

01:00:25.680 --> 01:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say that one is better than the other to</v>

01:00:29.360 --> 01:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have, because they pose different challenges, not necessarily easier or more difficult.</v>

01:00:36.400 --> 01:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, it can be a little more difficult to overcome</v>

01:00:39.440 --> 01:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the challenges in the West, because at least when you go to</v>

01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>someone in Africa or wherever else it happens to be, you can</v>

01:00:46.960 --> 01:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>say, Look at these practices of your traditional religion, look at what</v>

01:00:52.720 --> 01:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>God says.</v>

01:00:53.680 --> 01:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely all incompatible.</v>

01:00:55.920 --> 01:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You're doing something that is rankly demonic, and they can look at</v>

01:00:58.960 --> 01:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it, and you can bring them out of that, and they recognize</v>

01:01:01.600 --> 01:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's been a significant change.</v>

01:01:04.160 --> 01:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It can be very difficult to do the same thing with those</v>

01:01:07.280 --> 01:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in the West, to say nothing of the difference in intelligence because</v>

01:01:09.760 --> 01:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those in the West are going to mount a stronger opposition.</v>

01:01:12.880 --> 01:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons that some people like to go do</v>

01:01:15.120 --> 01:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>missions in the third world.</v>

01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's easier.</v>

01:01:18.640 --> 01:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>They do it because there are a lot of reasons, I don't</v>

01:01:21.200 --> 01:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get into all that now, but sometimes it's because it's</v>

01:01:23.600 --> 01:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>easier. It's easier to go deal with those people than it is</v>

01:01:26.080 --> 01:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to deal with your own.</v>

01:01:27.680 --> 01:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean you shouldn't deal with your own.</v>

01:01:29.280 --> 01:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's sinful not to deal with your own.</v>

01:01:31.920 --> 01:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Because God gave them to you, you should care for them first.</v>

01:01:35.040 --> 01:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's sort of a</v>

01:01:37.920 --> 01:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>long-winded perhaps way of addressing that issue.</v>

01:01:40.400 --> 01:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's worth bringing up all of the different facets</v>

01:01:43.600 --> 01:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of that.</v>

01:01:44.720 --> 01:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they necessarily have less of a problem with that</v>

01:01:50.240 --> 01:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>particular kind of demonic activity as they've come out of it and</v>

01:01:54.960 --> 01:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>so they personally have a recognition of that problem whereas we don't</v>

01:02:01.200 --> 01:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have that anymore in the West.</v>

01:02:03.920 --> 01:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean that they don't have a problem with syncretism</v>

01:02:07.200 --> 01:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because statistically according to the data, if you go deal with people</v>

01:02:11.200 --> 01:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on the ground over there as it were, they really do have</v>

01:02:13.440 --> 01:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a problem with syncretism.</v>

01:02:14.960 --> 01:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And it is a challenge for missionaries.</v>

01:02:21.520 --> 01:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about the appropriate the appropriate rather marriageable age for a</v>

01:02:25.840 --> 01:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>woman. I'm just going to give the standard Western European answer.</v>

01:02:30.080 --> 01:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You can go and look at the Hajnal line if you're so</v>

01:02:32.080 --> 01:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>inclined on Wikipedia because there is a divide between Western and Eastern</v>

01:02:37.600 --> 01:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe, Eastern Europeans have historically married earlier.</v>

01:02:41.600 --> 01:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Western Europeans have historically married later, but it's still twenties.</v>

01:02:46.400 --> 01:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And for women it's usually early twenties.</v>

01:02:48.800 --> 01:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like twenty-two to twenty-five, something like that.</v>

01:02:52.240 --> 01:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>A little earlier is fine, a little later is fine.</v>

01:02:54.640 --> 01:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Earlier is probably better because obviously there's a fertility window for women.</v>

01:02:58.480 --> 01:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And then men are usually a little later, but still usually either</v>

01:03:02.240 --> 01:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>late twenties or early thirties.</v>

01:03:04.480 --> 01:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much been the historical standard.</v>

01:03:06.960 --> 01:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It varies a little over time with the centuries and warfare and</v>

01:03:09.920 --> 01:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but that's been the standard.</v>

01:03:12.560 --> 01:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And then Eastern Europe, I can't remember the exact numbers, but it's</v>

01:03:15.520 --> 01:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like three to four years earlier.</v>

01:03:18.720 --> 01:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So So, instead of having a 21-year-old and a 27-year-old marry in</v>

01:03:23.680 --> 01:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>West, it would be a 24-year-old and a 19-year-old.</v>

01:03:27.040 --> 01:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not inappropriate.</v>

01:03:28.480 --> 01:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>That's totally fine.</v>

01:03:30.080 --> 01:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, this is coming up because of various things that have happened</v>

01:03:33.760 --> 01:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the news in the last say year, and then other things</v>

01:03:37.440 --> 01:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that have happened with certain individuals in the last say few days.</v>

01:03:41.680 --> 01:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

01:03:43.120 --> 01:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>no, it is not appropriate to be defending the marriage, we'll be</v>

01:03:48.080 --> 01:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>charitable here, of forty and fifty-year-old men to fourteen and fifteen-year-old girls.</v>

01:03:54.240 --> 01:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That is Categorically unacceptable.</v>

01:03:57.600 --> 01:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That is not something that has ever been standard practice, certainly in</v>

01:04:01.040 --> 01:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe, and it is not something for which we should ever</v>

01:04:04.240 --> 01:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>advocate. The reality of it is that you are not an adult</v>

01:04:09.680 --> 01:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>until you are at least in your late teens, and probably later</v>

01:04:15.200 --> 01:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>than that.</v>

01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not that you have to be, you know, your brain fully</v>

01:04:18.800 --> 01:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>developed and everything.</v>

01:04:19.920 --> 01:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't get married before that.</v>

01:04:21.680 --> 01:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that, because quite frankly, the research seems to show</v>

01:04:24.560 --> 01:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's not until you're thirty that your brain's done fully</v>

01:04:27.280 --> 01:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>developing. No one's going to seriously well, okay, some people will, but</v>

01:04:30.880 --> 01:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not serious people.</v>

01:04:32.160 --> 01:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>No serious person is going to seriously say you have to wait</v>

01:04:34.480 --> 01:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>until that age.</v>

01:04:36.880 --> 01:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And God seems to have designed it so that you don't, because</v>

01:04:40.560 --> 01:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>probably the neuroplasticity helps build that relationship in the early years, which</v>

01:04:45.920 --> 01:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>then carries you through the rest of your life.</v>

01:04:48.080 --> 01:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's probably part of how God designed the system to work.</v>

01:04:52.160 --> 01:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think the ideal probably is something like twenty-one for women</v>

01:04:55.760 --> 01:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and, you know, twenty-five, twenty-six for men.</v>

01:04:58.080 --> 01:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think having a little bit of gap in terms of age</v>

01:05:01.280 --> 01:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is good.</v>

01:05:02.080 --> 01:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It helps to reinforce that headship and the authority of the man</v>

01:05:05.120 --> 01:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>over the woman, but it shouldn't be too big of an age</v>

01:05:08.960 --> 01:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>gap simply because of the biological reality.</v>

01:05:11.680 --> 01:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is, you know, you're not going to live as</v>

01:05:14.240 --> 01:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>long as a man as the average woman.</v>

01:05:16.320 --> 01:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You probably don't want to leave your wife as a widow for</v>

01:05:19.760 --> 01:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>ten years.</v>

01:05:21.120 --> 01:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>If you can avoid it.</v>

01:05:22.880 --> 01:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, four or five years isn't as bad.</v>

01:05:25.920 --> 01:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>She She's probably going to outlive you by that much at least</v>

01:05:28.480 --> 01:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>anyway. So there's there's part of it is that.</v>

01:05:30.960 --> 01:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>There's also the aspect of it.</v>

01:05:33.120 --> 01:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the fertility window for women is significantly more important than the</v>

01:05:36.960 --> 01:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one for men, because the one for men basically doesn't exist.</v>

01:05:40.160 --> 01:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>But But</v>

01:05:41.280 --> 01:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you do run into more problems, birth defects, and things like that.</v>

01:05:45.680 --> 01:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>The risk increases with the age of the father.</v>

01:05:48.480 --> 01:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Not as severe as the age of the mother.</v>

01:05:51.360 --> 01:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't simply lose the ability to produce children when you hit</v>

01:05:54.480 --> 01:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain age as a man, but there are considerations for the</v>

01:05:58.640 --> 01:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>health of the children and just how many children you're going to</v>

01:06:00.800 --> 01:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have. And the simple fact of the matter is, if you have</v>

01:06:04.800 --> 01:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a child when you're 20 or 25, 26, whatever it happens to</v>

01:06:09.200 --> 01:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be, you are going to be at the peak of your energy</v>

01:06:12.240 --> 01:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and physical fitness most likely in order to raise that child appropriately.</v>

01:06:17.440 --> 01:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're 55 and you have your first child, you are going</v>

01:06:21.760 --> 01:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be unbelievably tired throughout the years of raising that child.</v>

01:06:26.560 --> 01:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be 65 when the child is 10.</v>

01:06:30.800 --> 01:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The by The biological reality is</v>

01:06:34.560 --> 01:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is.</v>

01:06:36.400 --> 01:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And you you may find it unpleasant, you may find it harsh,</v>

01:06:41.040 --> 01:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't change it.</v>

01:06:42.960 --> 01:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:06:44.160 --> 01:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we should be trying to minimize harm is what we're really trying</v>

01:06:47.680 --> 01:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, and to maximize the blessings from God.</v>

01:06:51.680 --> 01:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is getting married young.</v>

01:06:53.520 --> 01:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And also, obviously, I already spoke about sexual temptations and things like</v>

01:06:57.520 --> 01:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that, but if you're going to live through your twenties and your</v>

01:07:01.120 --> 01:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>thirties unmarried, it's going to be a lot harder for you to</v>

01:07:05.600 --> 01:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>stay celibate, to stay chaste, than chaste is more appropriate than celibate</v>

01:07:10.800 --> 01:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there, to stay chaste, than if you're married.</v>

01:07:14.080 --> 01:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality of it.</v>

01:07:15.360 --> 01:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's easier to do that as you get older.</v>

01:07:17.200 --> 01:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Again, biological reality.</v>

01:07:20.080 --> 01:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>But yes, the the marriageable age should be basically twenties.</v>

01:07:24.160 --> 01:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>That is sort of the ideal.</v>

01:07:26.400 --> 01:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>At least at this point in creation.</v>

01:07:28.800 --> 01:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, it was different back in the age of the patriarchs and</v>

01:07:31.520 --> 01:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but I don't personally plan to live to 600,</v>

01:07:35.760 --> 01:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and I doubt anyone in this chat is going to do that</v>

01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>either. Despite the promises of the tech oligarchs.</v>

01:08:02.320 --> 01:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if there are other questions in here.</v>

01:08:18.560 --> 01:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, certainly an aspect of the Sabbath that I I could have</v>

01:08:21.520 --> 01:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned, I have mentioned elsewhere, is that some services are necessary.</v>

01:08:25.120 --> 01:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I I did address that with the fact that the the</v>

01:08:27.760 --> 01:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>priests so-called profane the Sabbath by working on the Sabbath historically, obviously</v>

01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't priest today, in that sense.</v>

01:08:34.320 --> 01:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you can't call a pastor a priest, I don't</v>

01:08:36.640 --> 01:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>really care which term you used.</v>

01:08:38.480 --> 01:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I prefer pastor a little bit, but it it doesn't matter that</v>

01:08:41.360 --> 01:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>much. Necessary services should obviously continue.</v>

01:08:44.960 --> 01:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to shut down our hospitals on the Sabbath because</v>

01:08:48.240 --> 01:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>well that would kill people.</v>

01:08:50.400 --> 01:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably not good.</v>

01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You still need police on the Sabbath, you still need firefighters on</v>

01:08:55.520 --> 01:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the Sabbath.</v>

01:08:56.720 --> 01:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You need necessary workers, and there are such a thing, there is</v>

01:09:00.960 --> 01:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>such a thing as a necessary worker.</v>

01:09:04.160 --> 01:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Those people can go to a Saturday service or Friday or Wednesday,</v>

01:09:08.320 --> 01:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is that happens to fit their schedule.</v>

01:09:10.800 --> 01:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>God is not going to curse you because you are doing necessary</v>

01:09:14.720 --> 01:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>work on the Sabbath.</v>

01:09:16.560 --> 01:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You can think again of pulling the ox out of the well.</v>

01:09:29.920 --> 01:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I definitely have more questions, but most of them are getting into</v>

01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the sort of long answer.</v>

01:09:38.320 --> 01:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think I may wrap it up here for this week.</v>

01:09:42.160 --> 01:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I did want to mention some of the questions I've received are</v>

01:09:47.760 --> 01:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be longer answers and I don't necessarily want them to</v>

01:09:52.080 --> 01:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>take up the entire episode for a given week.</v>

01:09:55.280 --> 01:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I could do that, of course, but that's not really the goal</v>

01:09:57.840 --> 01:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get through a at least a fair number of</v>

01:10:00.400 --> 01:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>questions, you know, at least five or six instead of two.</v>

01:10:04.240 --> 01:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:10:05.440 --> 01:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what I will probably do in order to address those</v>

01:10:09.040 --> 01:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is I will release additional episodes on this same show, but not</v>

01:10:16.160 --> 01:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as a QA episode, more</v>

01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a stand-alone answer to a particular question.</v>

01:10:23.200 --> 01:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Those will be in the feed for the podcast version of this,</v>

01:10:27.920 --> 01:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>which is audio only.</v>

01:10:29.760 --> 01:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think I will also upload them to YouTube and elsewhere</v>

01:10:33.600 --> 01:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so people can find them more easily, whichever platform it is you</v>

01:10:36.160 --> 01:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>happen to use.</v>

01:10:36.960 --> 01:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Most people are on Are on either X or YouTube, so those</v>

01:10:39.840 --> 01:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are sort of the two key platforms, unsurprisingly.</v>

01:10:43.520 --> 01:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So for the questions that require a longer answer, I think that's</v>

01:10:47.680 --> 01:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what I will do.</v>

01:10:49.040 --> 01:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that fits in well with the overall goal because then</v>

01:10:53.040 --> 01:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I can give the detailed answers for the more complex, the more</v>

01:10:57.840 --> 01:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>involved questions, and continue to answer a good number of questions each</v>

01:11:03.200 --> 01:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>week in these shows as well.</v>

01:11:06.240 --> 01:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a question that is a little more involved,</v>

01:11:09.360 --> 01:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>expect to get an answer like that.</v>

01:11:11.360 --> 01:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't promise a particular time because it's really whenever I happen</v>

01:11:14.960 --> 01:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to have the time to get this done I do have a</v>

01:11:18.160 --> 01:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fair number of things to get done as well.</v>

01:11:22.320 --> 01:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone said is it unreasonable to want ten kids from a wife?</v>

01:11:25.280 --> 01:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I can answer that one in passing I don't think</v>

01:11:26.960 --> 01:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's unreasonable.</v>

01:11:27.680 --> 01:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>If you can manage that many, you know it's a matter of</v>

01:11:29.440 --> 01:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>wisdom. That's the short answer for children is it it's a matter</v>

01:11:32.480 --> 01:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of wisdom.</v>

01:11:33.040 --> 01:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Children are a blessing from the Lord.</v>

01:11:35.040 --> 01:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>They're always a blessing from the Lord.</v>

01:11:36.560 --> 01:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a question on that topic.</v>

01:11:37.760 --> 01:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I will get into that question either next week or the week</v>

01:11:41.040 --> 01:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>after, I believe.</v>

01:11:42.880 --> 01:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But children are a blessing from the Lord.</v>

01:11:47.840 --> 01:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the man who fills his quiver with them, the children</v>

01:11:50.720 --> 01:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of his youth.</v>

01:11:51.760 --> 01:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He will not be put to shame when he speaks with his</v>

01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>enemies in the gate.</v>

01:11:55.600 --> 01:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:11:57.200 --> 01:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>no, have as many children as God will bless you with, assuming</v>

01:12:01.280 --> 01:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have, you know, some biological issue that you're going</v>

01:12:04.320 --> 01:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to pass on to them that's going to kill them in early</v>

01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>childhood. Like there there are wisdom considerations.</v>

01:12:08.880 --> 01:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you have ten healthy children, your wife is able to</v>

01:12:11.920 --> 01:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bear that many, God gives you that many, by all means, go</v>

01:12:15.120 --> 01:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for it.</v>

01:12:15.680 --> 01:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>That's great to be blessed that much by God.</v>

01:12:18.720 --> 01:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean you have to have them one right after the</v>

01:12:21.120 --> 01:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>other. You are permitted to exercise discretion and have gaps between the</v>

01:12:25.840 --> 01:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>children. That's not a sin to do that.</v>

01:12:28.880 --> 01:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>There are sinful methods, but use the ones that aren't.</v>

01:12:32.560 --> 01:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The church has recognized that for centuries.</v>

01:12:37.200 --> 01:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But insofar as again, complicated questions, long answers, I think I will</v>

01:12:42.640 --> 01:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do that that way.</v>

01:12:44.560 --> 01:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's it for this week.</v>

01:12:48.320 --> 01:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I will add the other questions that I did not answer from</v>

01:12:52.320 --> 01:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the chat and elsewhere into my growing list of questions, which I</v>

01:12:57.040 --> 01:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>think is growing faster than I am answering them, but that's always</v>

01:12:59.840 --> 01:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how it's sort of going to be.</v>

01:13:01.760 --> 01:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I have on a related note to some things I touched on</v>

01:13:05.840 --> 01:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>tonight, I have an article I'm going to be posting hopefully tomorrow</v>

01:13:10.480 --> 01:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I will get it done and posted.</v>

01:13:13.040 --> 01:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of women, the relationship of men and women, because</v>

01:13:17.680 --> 01:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that issue just keeps coming up again and again and again.</v>

01:13:20.160 --> 01:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know why, and I've explained it before, and it's vitally</v>

01:13:22.880 --> 01:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>important to get it right.</v>

01:13:24.400 --> 01:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it will make feminists very angry, and that's probably part</v>

01:13:28.400 --> 01:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the point and it's a good thing.</v>

01:13:30.080 --> 01:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So I will be publishing that.</v>

01:13:32.320 --> 01:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find that on my website and of course Telegram and</v>

01:13:35.360 --> 01:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere there'll be notifications for that.</v>

01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to sign up for the audio only of</v>

01:13:42.160 --> 01:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this for whatever reason, that can be found at podcast.coreyjmoller.com.</v>

01:13:47.920 --> 01:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>You can submit your questions.</v>

01:13:49.760 --> 01:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a link in the description on whichever platform you're on</v>

01:13:52.640 --> 01:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's also in the show notes for each episode.</v>

01:13:56.320 --> 01:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Preferably submit the questions on the forum because it's just easiest for</v>

01:14:00.480 --> 01:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>me and it helps to organize and so other people can find</v>

01:14:03.440 --> 01:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>them in the future, which is kind of the point to make</v>

01:14:06.320 --> 01:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>these accessible in the future not just as a transitory sort of</v>

01:14:10.160 --> 01:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thing. I think that pretty much covers it for housekeeping though.</v>

01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And I hope you all have a great rest of your weekend</v>

01:14:17.840 --> 01:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or all of your weekend if it's just starting now.</v>

01:14:21.840 --> 01:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for your time.</v>

01:14:24.320 --> 01:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for those who submitted the questions.</v>

01:14:26.160 --> 01:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And even for those if I did not get to your question,</v>

01:14:28.480 --> 01:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I will again in the future try to do that.</v>

01:14:30.720 --> 01:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And again I hope you have a good weekend.</v>

01:14:32.800 --> 01:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>God bless you all.</v>

01:14:34.080 --> 01:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.</v>

01:14:35.200 --> 01:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully on Thursday.</v>