WEBVTT

00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It is the 9th of January, 2026.</v>

00:00:03.280 --> 00:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I am Corey J.</v>

00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Mahler, and this is at any cost.</v>

00:00:06.720 --> 00:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the 11th episode, the second QA episode of 2026, and</v>

00:00:12.880 --> 00:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I will just jump into things right away.</v>

00:00:15.600 --> 00:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I will initially go for a question that I happen to notice</v>

00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the chat.</v>

00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about the tetragrammaton.</v>

00:00:21.680 --> 00:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I see that he's already had some people respond with the episode</v>

00:00:25.040 --> 00:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Judaizing heresy.</v>

00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a good place to start with that.</v>

00:00:28.720 --> 00:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>There is also a good thread from Woe on X that is</v>

00:00:32.240 --> 00:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>still up.</v>

00:00:33.360 --> 00:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I will go ahead and link to that in the show notes.</v>

00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll make a note of that</v>

00:00:40.240 --> 00:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And the short answer is that the word is Lord.</v>

00:00:43.920 --> 00:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It's kurios in the Greek, and we just translate it as Lord.</v>

00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So anytime you see that, and I know there are some English</v>

00:00:52.400 --> 00:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>versions that leave that untranslated just have the tetragrammaton there or have</v>

00:00:57.280 --> 00:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to say the word because it's it's Yahweh,</v>

00:01:00.080 --> 00:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>which is not what it is, which is the problem</v>

00:01:03.440 --> 00:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that is Judaizing, you should not use that one.</v>

00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And so if they leave it untranslated, that's not as bad.</v>

00:01:10.320 --> 00:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of silly because when you translate something, you should probably</v>

00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>translate the entire document, not leave random words untranslated.</v>

00:01:19.200 --> 00:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Unless there's some particularly important reason for doing it.</v>

00:01:23.760 --> 00:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>given that we have it translated in the Septuagint into curios into</v>

00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Lord, there's no reason to leave it untranslated in English.</v>

00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you see that, just mentally translate it as the Lord.</v>

00:01:35.600 --> 00:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'll do if I happen to be reading the ALV,</v>

00:01:39.520 --> 00:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the American Literary Version, because it does that.</v>

00:01:42.080 --> 00:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So So which is unfortunate because I actually kind of like the</v>

00:01:45.600 --> 00:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>English of it.</v>

00:01:46.320 --> 00:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish it were based on the Septuagint instead of being based</v>

00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Masoretic text, but it is still a nice translation to</v>

00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have. It reads very nicely.</v>

00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Even if it obviously has some des deficits.</v>

00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So I will pull up my list of questions here.</v>

00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'll be able to get to the questions</v>

00:02:06.720 --> 00:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I see popping up in the chat.</v>

00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I will note them down for next time.</v>

00:02:10.960 --> 00:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I already have a fairly long list here and I'm going to</v>

00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>try to get to all the ones that I have in the</v>

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>list, but we will see how that goes.</v>

00:02:19.920 --> 00:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course the first question is very much related to that</v>

00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of preliminary question, so I guess this is really the second</v>

00:02:27.920 --> 00:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>question, but which is the inspired version of Daniel is basically the</v>

00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>question. And we deliberately did not address that, because we believe that</v>

00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is a question that should be left to the men who eventually</v>

00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>do the real work of translating the Septuagint properly into a true</v>

00:02:47.600 --> 00:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>English translation.</v>

00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The English translation that will be basically the master translation for some</v>

00:02:53.920 --> 00:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>time going into the future.</v>

00:02:55.840 --> 00:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And personally I am strongly inclined toward just saying use the use</v>

00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the one and the Septuagint.</v>

00:03:02.480 --> 00:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And for those who aren't aware, there's the Edocian, there's the Septuagint,</v>

00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously there's the Masoretic.</v>

00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And there are some questions about which one is basically the original</v>

00:03:13.360 --> 00:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>version of Daniel and which one should be Should be controlling essentially.</v>

00:03:16.960 --> 00:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I am inclined towards saying just use the one in the Septuagint.</v>

00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying the people who do the translating have to do</v>

00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that. not saying it's a requirement that you believe that, that it's</v>

00:03:27.280 --> 00:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sin not to believe it That's just my personal inclination.</v>

00:03:31.040 --> 00:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I have not spent a particularly great amount of time looking into</v>

00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it, which is why I don't have a definitive answer.</v>

00:03:37.680 --> 00:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm simply going to say it's this one.</v>

00:03:40.160 --> 00:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not particularly worried about it.</v>

00:03:42.640 --> 00:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a question for the eventual translating well, the translation committee, right?</v>

00:03:47.440 --> 00:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It's for them.</v>

00:03:48.480 --> 00:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why we essentially avoided that in our series on the Septuagint.</v>

00:03:53.280 --> 00:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And partly just because it would sort of been getting off into</v>

00:03:56.240 --> 00:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the weeds, instead of the core focus of that series, which was</v>

00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pointing out the Septuagint is the Word of God.</v>

00:04:03.760 --> 00:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So the short answer is yep, that's for the translators to deal</v>

00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with that.</v>

00:04:13.200 --> 00:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The next question I have here</v>

00:04:16.240 --> 00:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is one where we can go ahead and just make the feminists</v>

00:04:20.080 --> 00:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even more angry at me.</v>

00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>In the episode on the nature of woman, you say a woman's</v>

00:04:25.520 --> 00:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>father. Actually, this is not the episode, the article, rather, this is</v>

00:04:28.080 --> 00:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on my website.</v>

00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll link to it in the show notes.</v>

00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You say a woman's father or husband has the duty to rebuke</v>

00:04:33.440 --> 00:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or punish her when she expresses a wicked desire.</v>

00:04:37.120 --> 00:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>True. I still hold that position.</v>

00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the punishment for essentially what sort of punishment is the</v>

00:04:44.480 --> 00:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>man supposed to use with regard to the women who have been</v>

00:04:47.760 --> 00:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>entrusted to his care?</v>

00:04:49.280 --> 00:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And of course that's a delicate question and has to be a</v>

00:04:51.760 --> 00:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>delicate answer, and it's going to make people angry regardless of what</v>

00:04:55.520 --> 00:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I say.</v>

00:04:56.480 --> 00:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Feminists are angry anyway, so it hardly matters.</v>

00:04:59.600 --> 00:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>corporal punishment is really the core of what is being asked here,</v>

00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>naturally. Corporal punishment is very much on the table.</v>

00:05:08.320 --> 00:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Spanking children is acceptable.</v>

00:05:10.320 --> 00:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Spanking your wife if necessary and a different context here from the</v>

00:05:13.840 --> 00:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>normal one perhaps is also something that may be necessary.</v>

00:05:17.840 --> 00:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It is sort of a last resort because you don't want to</v>

00:05:22.480 --> 00:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be the sort of man who immediately resorts to using your physical</v>

00:05:26.480 --> 00:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>strength, which you have an advantage as a man, over if you</v>

00:05:30.240 --> 00:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>are have young children anyway, over everyone else in your household.</v>

00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You are much stronger than all of them, probably stronger than all</v>

00:05:36.880 --> 00:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of them combined.</v>

00:05:38.560 --> 00:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And so you don't want that to be the last resort.</v>

00:05:41.440 --> 00:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>One, it sets a bad example.</v>

00:05:43.760 --> 00:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And two, it's really showing that you don't actually have control over</v>

00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>your household, that you have to resort to that.</v>

00:05:49.920 --> 00:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>There are other things you should be doing.</v>

00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>A big part of this is simply avoiding those issues in the</v>

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>first place by making sure that you are instructing your household well,</v>

00:05:59.920 --> 00:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that you are bringing up your children in the faith, that you</v>

00:06:02.160 --> 00:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are leading your wife, that you are engaging in the things that</v>

00:06:05.520 --> 00:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to do as the head of your household to not</v>

00:06:08.400 --> 00:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have those problems arise.</v>

00:06:10.080 --> 00:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Now of course the problems will still arise to some degree because</v>

00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we live in a fallen world and everyone has sinful impulses and</v>

00:06:16.080 --> 00:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they give into them.</v>

00:06:18.400 --> 00:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>When that happens, basically it is a matter of wisdom.</v>

00:06:23.440 --> 00:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You are trying to decide what is going to be the most</v>

00:06:26.960 --> 00:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>effective in that scenario to achieve the end you want to achieve</v>

00:06:31.840 --> 00:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>without inflicting undue harm?</v>

00:06:34.880 --> 00:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not because necessarily you're trying to manipulate people or you're trying</v>

00:06:39.760 --> 00:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to avoid To avoid exercising the sort of physical authority that God</v>

00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>has given you.</v>

00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Rather, it's because you're trying to do what is best for those</v>

00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>entrusted to your care, and that isn't going to be getting out</v>

00:06:52.320 --> 00:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the belt every single time.</v>

00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone really knows that.</v>

00:06:55.600 --> 00:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>That sort of goes without saying.</v>

00:06:56.720 --> 00:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We all know that you don't just get out the belt and</v>

00:06:58.960 --> 00:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>spank your child every time he does anything wrong.</v>

00:07:02.400 --> 00:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he takes a extra cookie off the counter, you</v>

00:07:05.840 --> 00:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>probably don't immediately resort to the belt or the switch.</v>

00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>There are other steps in between just a stern talking to sometimes</v>

00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's enough.</v>

00:07:15.200 --> 00:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And then corporal punishment is at the other end of things.</v>

00:07:18.480 --> 00:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So there is a grade of things.</v>

00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's going to depend on the nature of the transgression, the nature</v>

00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of sort of the relationship you've built up in your family and</v>

00:07:28.240 --> 00:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know why did this person do that?</v>

00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course that's going to be part of it.</v>

00:07:32.640 --> 00:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it a direct challenge to your authority?</v>

00:07:35.280 --> 00:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>That's different from just a child giving in to a sweet tooth.</v>

00:07:39.440 --> 00:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a different thing.</v>

00:07:40.880 --> 00:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>If he took the cookie because he likes cookies, that's one thing.</v>

00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>If he took it because you told him he cannot have it</v>

00:07:47.760 --> 00:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>until after dinner, whatever you happen to tell him, that's a different</v>

00:07:51.200 --> 00:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>thing. That's a more serious transgression because he is deliberately saying, I</v>

00:07:55.280 --> 00:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really believe you're in charge.</v>

00:07:57.040 --> 00:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He's testing your authority, and that's a different thing.</v>

00:08:00.240 --> 00:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Then it is required of you to more firmly establish that no,</v>

00:08:04.880 --> 00:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I am in charge because God has placed me in charge and</v>

00:08:07.840 --> 00:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to obey.</v>

00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true with regard to your wife, because of</v>

00:08:12.080 --> 00:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>course she is also placed under you in your household.</v>

00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You are her head, you make the decisions, and you'll answer to</v>

00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>God for those decisions.</v>

00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So some people when they hear about headship think that it's just</v>

00:08:23.280 --> 00:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>men getting it to lord it over women and be tyrants in</v>

00:08:26.080 --> 00:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>their home, and it's not that, because it is primarily a matter</v>

00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of duty and responsibility, because you are going to answer to God</v>

00:08:33.280 --> 00:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for every single decision you make.</v>

00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>This is one thing that I</v>

00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Tend to say to women when they bring up sort of objections</v>

00:08:41.040 --> 00:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to headship and things like that, I point out you should want</v>

00:08:44.080 --> 00:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to help your husband with these things because he is going to</v>

00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>answer to God for every single decision he made with regard to</v>

00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the marriage and leading you and all these other things.</v>

00:08:54.560 --> 00:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't make it more difficult for him.</v>

00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's similar to the passage that says that you are to give</v>

00:08:59.920 --> 00:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>honor and respect to those who are your leaders and you are</v>

00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it so that they don't have to do it with</v>

00:09:05.040 --> 00:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>grumbling and basically don't be a terrible follower.</v>

00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true, don't be a terrible member of the</v>

00:09:12.080 --> 00:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>household, making the head of the household's job that much more difficult.</v>

00:09:17.120 --> 00:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So So the short answer, calibrate the punishment to the person, the</v>

00:09:22.880 --> 00:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>transgression, the relationship.</v>

00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of wisdom.</v>

00:09:27.040 --> 00:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>As a man, that is your place in the household, and there's</v>

00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>no way around that.</v>

00:09:31.840 --> 00:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>No one is going to be able to just give you a</v>

00:09:33.760 --> 00:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet where you go, here's the transgression, and then here's the number</v>

00:09:38.320 --> 00:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of times, and all these other steps, and then oh, I have</v>

00:09:40.960 --> 00:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to hit him with the belt three times at half strength.</v>

00:09:44.240 --> 00:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not possible.</v>

00:09:45.920 --> 00:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>These are matters for wisdom.</v>

00:09:47.760 --> 00:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to exercise the amount of wisdom that God gave you,</v>

00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the degree of wisdom he gave you to make these decisions.</v>

00:09:55.520 --> 00:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Part of it, of course, is spending time in God's Word so</v>

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know his requirements, and if you spend time in God's Word</v>

00:10:01.280 --> 00:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with your children and with your wife, it will help them to</v>

00:10:04.320 --> 00:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>know the requirements as well.</v>

00:10:05.920 --> 00:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>These things shouldn't just fall out of the sky, come out of</v>

00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the blue.</v>

00:10:09.120 --> 00:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>They should know the expectations in the household because you should be</v>

00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>transparent with those.</v>

00:10:14.960 --> 00:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>They should know what is required of them, and they should know</v>

00:10:17.440 --> 00:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of not obeying.</v>

00:10:19.840 --> 00:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Because this is very much a matter of obeying, and I know</v>

00:10:22.480 --> 00:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>many people hate to hear that word these days.</v>

00:10:24.800 --> 00:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But that is the reality.</v>

00:10:26.560 --> 00:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Because Scripture is abundantly clear wives are to submit to their husbands</v>

00:10:31.120 --> 00:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as unto the Lord, and they are to obey him in all</v>

00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>things. The only exception is if a husband tells a wife to</v>

00:10:39.360 --> 00:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do something that would say be blasphemy, then it is we must</v>

00:10:42.800 --> 00:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>obey God rather than men.</v>

00:10:44.480 --> 00:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the only exception.</v>

00:10:46.720 --> 00:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So So that's the basic answer to that question.</v>

00:10:50.880 --> 00:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I'm sure that will make feminists much happier with me</v>

00:10:54.480 --> 00:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>than they already are.</v>

00:10:56.960 --> 00:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>The next question sort of shifting gears here to politics.</v>

00:11:02.160 --> 00:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Politics and economics, really, and they are very much related.</v>

00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I have my general view, just to start out before I give</v>

00:11:09.840 --> 00:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the question, is that I don't really think of economics as an</v>

00:11:13.600 --> 00:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>ideology or an ideological subject.</v>

00:11:16.640 --> 00:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think of economics as a tool because I think of it</v>

00:11:20.400 --> 00:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>as something that you use to achieve a given end.</v>

00:11:23.760 --> 00:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, can there be some ideology along the way?</v>

00:11:26.400 --> 00:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Certainly. I think more of that is politics and sociology in the</v>

00:11:31.280 --> 00:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>proper sense of the term, not the modern corruption.</v>

00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more that just applied to regulating the market and</v>

00:11:38.640 --> 00:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>commerce. Again, also tools.</v>

00:11:41.200 --> 00:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have really an ideology when it comes to economics.</v>

00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways that I've explained it is that I don't</v>

00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>have an ideology of hammers.</v>

00:11:50.800 --> 00:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>or any other tool.</v>

00:11:52.880 --> 00:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I use the tool when it is suitable for the task.</v>

00:11:56.480 --> 00:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with regard to economics, but the question here, let</v>

00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>me pull the actual wording of the question.</v>

00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping you could speak on the economic model or miracle</v>

00:12:09.680 --> 00:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen thirties Germany as well as resources regarding this.</v>

00:12:14.080 --> 00:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>A friend of mine asked me for resources on this and I</v>

00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>did not have anything to suggest He's a former libertarian, as are</v>

00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>many on the right, who gave up on capitalism after listening to</v>

00:12:23.680 --> 00:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the Stonequire episode on it and talking with me.</v>

00:12:26.880 --> 00:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your time.</v>

00:12:29.840 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those subjects that obviously could absorb more than</v>

00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the time for this evening.</v>

00:12:39.040 --> 00:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But the short version is that the goal of the third Reich</v>

00:12:45.040 --> 00:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was to break the control of international finance and debt slavery, basically,</v>

00:12:52.400 --> 00:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to build a currency that was part of it, of course, was</v>

00:12:55.920 --> 00:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>changing their currency, to build a currency that was based on the</v>

00:12:59.920 --> 00:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>productivity of the people instead of being based on debt, which is</v>

00:13:04.160 --> 00:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the case with our currency in the United States, for instance, and</v>

00:13:07.200 --> 00:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>any other currency that is backed by</v>

00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>well</v>

00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a central bank will say to try and not get a strike</v>

00:13:15.680 --> 00:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>here. But insofar as reading materials are concerned, I think that's really</v>

00:13:21.760 --> 00:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>probably the better recommendation for me to give here because that's what</v>

00:13:25.680 --> 00:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>your friend is going to want if he is interested in economics.</v>

00:13:28.880 --> 00:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He's going to want something to read.</v>

00:13:30.480 --> 00:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Just like the men who are very interested in theology are going</v>

00:13:33.280 --> 00:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to want book recommendations.</v>

00:13:35.120 --> 00:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So the recommendations, and I'll put these in the show notes to</v>

00:13:38.320 --> 00:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they're accessible.</v>

00:13:40.400 --> 00:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And for those who don't know, I publish this after the stream</v>

00:13:45.520 --> 00:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as a podcast, and so that is available with show notes and</v>

00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>other things like that.</v>

00:13:49.600 --> 00:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course I'll try to remember to put all those on</v>

00:13:52.160 --> 00:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the forum as well.</v>

00:13:53.520 --> 00:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And anyone who's a trusted member of the forum can edit the</v>

00:13:56.880 --> 00:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wiki for each episode and add resources or anything I mention if</v>

00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you are so inclined to help me keep that sort of neat</v>

00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and tidy.</v>

00:14:05.280 --> 00:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But the recommendations would basically be Gottfried Freeder would be the primary</v>

00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>recommendation there.</v>

00:14:13.600 --> 00:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>His manifesto for breaking the interest bondage of money is probably going</v>

00:14:18.080 --> 00:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the number one recommendation.</v>

00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And then he also has another work that is the program of</v>

00:14:24.080 --> 00:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the NSDAP and its ideological principles, which again deals with sort of</v>

00:14:29.680 --> 00:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the integration of politics and economics because he was an economist, so</v>

00:14:33.680 --> 00:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of his interest.</v>

00:14:35.280 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Another one would be actually an American writer who was writing on</v>

00:14:40.720 --> 00:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>related matters?</v>

00:14:42.000 --> 00:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Friedrich Liszt, L I S T, the last name.</v>

00:14:45.040 --> 00:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Again, I'll put it in the show notes.</v>

00:14:46.960 --> 00:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>The National System of Political Economy.</v>

00:14:50.160 --> 00:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be another good read for someone who is interested</v>

00:14:52.800 --> 00:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in this area.</v>

00:14:53.360 --> 00:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying everyone should read these materials because if you don't</v>

00:14:56.560 --> 00:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have an interest in economics or you don't have a background in</v>

00:14:59.600 --> 00:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>economics, it either will not be of interest or it will be</v>

00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>quite a slog.</v>

00:15:03.840 --> 00:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just going to depend on sort of your your background, your</v>

00:15:06.560 --> 00:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>interest level.</v>

00:15:07.680 --> 00:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And then on a more sort of practical level, you have Hermann</v>

00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Göring had the four year plan.</v>

00:15:14.880 --> 00:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And you can look up the actual plans of the Third Reich,</v>

00:15:18.800 --> 00:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted to accomplish, how they were accomplishing it, they basically</v>

00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had progress reports on these things.</v>

00:15:24.160 --> 00:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>These materials are all available and many of them are translated into</v>

00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>English and of course now with AI, you can get a workable</v>

00:15:31.360 --> 00:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>English translation of certainly any German document.</v>

00:15:34.240 --> 00:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And then of course, his book as well, Goering's book, Germany Reborn</v>

00:15:38.720 --> 00:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is the title in English.</v>

00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think those are probably the best recommendations for someone who is</v>

00:15:43.600 --> 00:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in the economics of the Third Reich and sort of how</v>

00:15:48.880 --> 00:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they achieved that economic miracle because of course they went from</v>

00:15:54.160 --> 00:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember the numbers now, but I think it was six</v>

00:15:56.240 --> 00:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>million, something like that, unemployed in the in the early nineteen thirties,</v>

00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty two, nineteen thirty three.</v>

00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You can look this up, of course, but that's to the best</v>

00:16:05.280 --> 00:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of my recol recollection.</v>

00:16:06.800 --> 00:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And after a period of five years, so basically basically one four</v>

00:16:10.560 --> 00:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>year program, they were able to bring that number down to under</v>

00:16:14.400 --> 00:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand, which is to say basically full employment.</v>

00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Something that very few nations have achieved historically, other than of course</v>

00:16:23.280 --> 00:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>nations that have slavery, which is a different matter.</v>

00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:16:28.880 --> 00:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that alone is an economic miracle.</v>

00:16:31.920 --> 00:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>There's also the aspect that they were able to massively increase GDP</v>

00:16:35.680 --> 00:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>because the GDP The GDP basically doubled in that time period as</v>

00:16:40.240 --> 00:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>well. Roughly that much.</v>

00:16:42.880 --> 00:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, it's important to note, and I</v>

00:16:46.240 --> 00:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know that many who come out of the libertarian school and others</v>

00:16:49.280 --> 00:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like that are going to perhaps object to what I say next,</v>

00:16:52.640 --> 00:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to think, oh, you're talking about Keynesianism.</v>

00:16:56.160 --> 00:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But the Third Reich did use deficit spending.</v>

00:17:00.640 --> 00:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And deficit spending should not be a dirty word.</v>

00:17:04.160 --> 00:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll give a brief, very simplistic example of why this is not</v>

00:17:08.640 --> 00:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem.</v>

00:17:10.000 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>If your deficit spending is calibrated correctly and it And it increases</v>

00:17:16.400 --> 00:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the growth of GDP.</v>

00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And I know some people are going, oh, don't you not care</v>

00:17:19.360 --> 00:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>about GDP?</v>

00:17:20.320 --> 00:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>GDP's not everything, but GDP's not nothing.</v>

00:17:23.360 --> 00:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's say tiny country, $10 million dollar GDP.</v>

00:17:28.880 --> 00:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to use easy numbers for the sake of the</v>

00:17:31.440 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>example. Ten million dollars GDP.</v>

00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>They spend a million dollars deficit spending in order to stimulate the</v>

00:17:40.320 --> 00:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>economy and grow the economy.</v>

00:17:42.080 --> 00:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they're wildly successful because it makes the numbers easy.</v>

00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They increase the economy to a hundred million dollars.</v>

00:17:49.840 --> 00:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>A hundred million dollars GDP.</v>

00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, now how much of GDP is that one million they spent</v>

00:17:56.960 --> 00:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to incentivize and increase basically the velocity of money through</v>

00:18:01.840 --> 00:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the system and things like that to increase the GDP?</v>

00:18:05.120 --> 00:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Well it was ten percent of GDP that they spent, now it's</v>

00:18:09.440 --> 00:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one percent.</v>

00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you can in fact grow your way out of deficit</v>

00:18:14.480 --> 00:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>spending. You have to make sure that you're investing in things that</v>

00:18:17.840 --> 00:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are actually worth the investment.</v>

00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It can't just be a hundred billion dollars of graft spent in</v>

00:18:24.320 --> 00:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>various places around the world, which is basically a description of the</v>

00:18:27.120 --> 00:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>US budget with bigger numbers.</v>

00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you spend it on infrastructure, if you spend it on</v>

00:18:34.560 --> 00:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>things your country actually needs, so for instance in the German case</v>

00:18:38.080 --> 00:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Autobahn, if you spend it on these things, you actually do</v>

00:18:42.320 --> 00:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>increase the productivity of the country, you increase the productivity of your</v>

00:18:45.360 --> 00:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>people, you incentivize economic development and you actually manage to effectively spend</v>

00:18:51.040 --> 00:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing because that deficit that you spent is paid for in the</v>

00:18:55.440 --> 00:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>increase in GDP.</v>

00:18:57.360 --> 00:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the basic outline of how deficit spending can be</v>

00:19:02.320 --> 00:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>used to incentivize an economy.</v>

00:19:03.840 --> 00:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And I have nothing wrong with that.</v>

00:19:05.040 --> 00:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I have no objection to that whatsoever.</v>

00:19:07.520 --> 00:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We did do that with Works programs and things like that in</v>

00:19:10.800 --> 00:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the US in order in order to help get out of the</v>

00:19:12.800 --> 00:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>depression. That was one of the things that we did.</v>

00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>If you go to particularly those of us who like hiking and</v>

00:19:19.120 --> 00:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>camping and things like that, go to the national parks.</v>

00:19:22.560 --> 00:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of the nicest parts of the infrastructure in the national parks</v>

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>were public works programs.</v>

00:19:28.240 --> 00:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They still are to some degree because of course the National Park</v>

00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Service is socialism, if you want to use that word.</v>

00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It is something that is paid for by the government that benefits</v>

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>society at large, but it was literally a public works program for</v>

00:19:43.760 --> 00:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>men who were out of work during that interwar period that built</v>

00:19:47.520 --> 00:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>many of those things.</v>

00:19:49.280 --> 00:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>One example would be the roadway that goes up to the Sequoia</v>

00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Park in California.</v>

00:19:56.080 --> 00:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>If you go up to that from the south side, the stonework</v>

00:20:01.040 --> 00:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>was done by that works program, and it's beautiful stonework done exceptionally</v>

00:20:05.600 --> 00:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>well, better than most of the stuff we do today.</v>

00:20:09.440 --> 00:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Tangential note, don't take that route if you're in a large vehicle.</v>

00:20:13.200 --> 00:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It has hairpin turns.</v>

00:20:14.880 --> 00:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Take the one from the north.</v>

00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>But it is something that was produced by what many would call</v>

00:20:19.520 --> 00:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>socialism. There's nothing wrong with that.</v>

00:20:21.760 --> 00:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It works, it can be done well, and it was certainly done</v>

00:20:25.920 --> 00:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>well, at least one time in a Western country, with exceptional, virtually</v>

00:20:31.120 --> 00:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>miraculous results.</v>

00:20:32.960 --> 00:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time we shouldn't really call it miraculous, because</v>

00:20:36.160 --> 00:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it can be repeated.</v>

00:20:37.600 --> 00:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>If you call it miraculous, you're sort of implying that it shouldn't</v>

00:20:42.080 --> 00:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have turned out that way.</v>

00:20:43.760 --> 00:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It was contrary to what you would expect to be the outcome,</v>

00:20:48.400 --> 00:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's simply not the case.</v>

00:20:50.560 --> 00:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Because I fully believe that if we replicated those programs here, we</v>

00:20:54.400 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>would have the same sort of success.</v>

00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, there's going to be some problems, we have to clean out</v>

00:20:59.600 --> 00:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>some corruption and things here, but I still think it could be</v>

00:21:02.640 --> 00:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>done. But I think those are those books are the place to</v>

00:21:07.040 --> 00:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>start for your friend.</v>

00:21:09.600 --> 00:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The next question is sort of a more lighthearted one.</v>

00:21:13.280 --> 00:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked me about my favorite tank.</v>

00:21:14.960 --> 00:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for the person who asked, the answers I don't really have</v>

00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>one. I never really got into tanks.</v>

00:21:20.880 --> 00:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That was never really my particular interest.</v>

00:21:24.240 --> 00:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So I mean obviously I like some of the German tanks from</v>

00:21:27.920 --> 00:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>World War II.</v>

00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is surprised by that answer.</v>

00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't really have a favorite tank.</v>

00:21:35.200 --> 00:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:21:36.640 --> 00:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>A more serious question from the same person, not a follow up,</v>

00:21:39.760 --> 00:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but I guess it's sort of related.</v>

00:21:42.000 --> 00:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Having already listened to A Young Man's Life, the Stone Choir episode,</v>

00:21:46.160 --> 00:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>would there be any other words of encouragement to a younger guy</v>

00:21:49.280 --> 00:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to find love?</v>

00:21:52.640 --> 00:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those questions that comes up all the time</v>

00:21:55.680 --> 00:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not surprising if you look at the marriage statistics, and</v>

00:21:59.280 --> 00:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>don't look at the divorce statistics and think that it's as bad</v>

00:22:02.480 --> 00:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as they look.</v>

00:22:03.840 --> 00:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Because bear in mind when they give you that number, it's for</v>

00:22:07.840 --> 00:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all marriages.</v>

00:22:09.680 --> 00:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>The number you want is first marriages, because if you marry and</v>

00:22:14.720 --> 00:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>stay married, well the number of divorces you had is zero, right?</v>

00:22:20.240 --> 00:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But if there's another person who marries and divorces fifteen times, well</v>

00:22:26.560 --> 00:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>now the average divorce rate for this small system is seven plus.</v>

00:22:33.280 --> 00:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem.</v>

00:22:34.560 --> 00:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You have people who are included who marry and divorce like they're</v>

00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>changing shoes.</v>

00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>If you exclude those people, the numbers are nowhere near as bad.</v>

00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the big problem for younger generations, that's certainly millennials like</v>

00:22:47.440 --> 00:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>myself, zoomers and younger, although for the much younger generation it's not</v>

00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>an issue yet, will be in the coming years.</v>

00:22:55.760 --> 00:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It's that first marriage, right?</v>

00:22:58.560 --> 00:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Because many of the younger generation are not married.</v>

00:23:02.800 --> 00:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>They've never been married.</v>

00:23:04.320 --> 00:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And some of them are not dating and things like that.</v>

00:23:07.520 --> 00:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of reasons for that.</v>

00:23:10.000 --> 00:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:23:11.360 --> 00:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a related question that I know I have later on in</v>

00:23:14.160 --> 00:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>my list for tonight that I'll comment on more of this stuff</v>

00:23:16.960 --> 00:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there, but</v>

00:23:19.280 --> 00:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing is you just have to get out there and</v>

00:23:21.920 --> 00:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>try. And I know it's not the sort of advice that most</v>

00:23:24.560 --> 00:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>people want to hear, and I know it's hard advice to hear,</v>

00:23:27.520 --> 00:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and there are going to be those who think, oh, you're just</v>

00:23:29.360 --> 00:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>out of touch.</v>

00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>No, I know how hard it is out there.</v>

00:23:31.600 --> 00:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible.</v>

00:23:33.120 --> 00:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It is not good at all for the younger generations.</v>

00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:23:38.320 --> 00:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that you can't find a wife.</v>

00:23:41.840 --> 00:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that you don't have an opportunity to start a</v>

00:23:44.400 --> 00:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>family. It does mean that it's going to be much more challenging</v>

00:23:47.600 --> 00:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>than it was for previous generations.</v>

00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly going to be harder if you are a Zoomer, if</v>

00:23:52.720 --> 00:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you're Gen Z, than it was for your boomer grandparents, or whatever</v>

00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they happen to be for you, probably grandparents in your case.</v>

00:24:01.840 --> 00:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality of the situation, but we do the best</v>

00:24:05.520 --> 00:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>with what we have.</v>

00:24:06.880 --> 00:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And I've recommended to guys one of the best things you can</v>

00:24:09.600 --> 00:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do is go out there and just ask out a barista or</v>

00:24:14.480 --> 00:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>someone working at cat as a cashier, wherever it happens to be.</v>

00:24:19.760 --> 00:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Some guys get hung up on they are trying to find this</v>

00:24:23.520 --> 00:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>perfect woman, and I don't really necessarily hate to be the bearer</v>

00:24:27.200 --> 00:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of bad news, but I'm gonna tell you she doesn't exist.</v>

00:24:30.640 --> 00:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Perfect wives don't exist.</v>

00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, you can find women who will make better wives sort of</v>

00:24:38.800 --> 00:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate, as it were, because if they were raised</v>

00:24:43.040 --> 00:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>by a staunch Christian father, if they were told from the time</v>

00:24:47.040 --> 00:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they were little that you know, your duty in life is going</v>

00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a wife and a mother, you're going to be a</v>

00:24:51.920 --> 00:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>homemaker, you're going to do X, Y, and Z.</v>

00:24:54.320 --> 00:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a lot easier for you to step into</v>

00:24:57.520 --> 00:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the shoes that he's sort of already prepared.</v>

00:25:00.800 --> 00:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And many of the older generation drop the ball on that.</v>

00:25:05.280 --> 00:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you are going to find some women who don't have</v>

00:25:09.600 --> 00:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>any of that background.</v>

00:25:11.840 --> 00:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You can sort of train those women to be good wives.</v>

00:25:15.280 --> 00:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the point I'm getting at here.</v>

00:25:17.120 --> 00:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Good wives are made, not just found lying around.</v>

00:25:20.560 --> 00:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't just go to some random church and it's full of</v>

00:25:23.120 --> 00:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect wives waiting for a husband to appear.</v>

00:25:26.800 --> 00:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But the kind of women you do want to avoid are the</v>

00:25:29.040 --> 00:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>ones who have been so damaged by their path through life that</v>

00:25:35.040 --> 00:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they have decided they are going to do everything they possibly can</v>

00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to never be a wife, or to be a terrible one.</v>

00:25:41.680 --> 00:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to be a matter of discernment.</v>

00:25:44.320 --> 00:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not always going to be the easiest call, but to some</v>

00:25:47.440 --> 00:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>degree guys have sort of an instinct for that.</v>

00:25:50.160 --> 00:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You know when a woman is going to cause trouble in your</v>

00:25:52.640 --> 00:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>life. Every woman is going to cause trouble in your life, but</v>

00:25:55.600 --> 00:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know when she's going to cause the kind of trouble that</v>

00:25:57.760 --> 00:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to have.</v>

00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Because Paul's not wrong when he says if you marry you're going</v>

00:26:03.200 --> 00:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to have trouble in this life.</v>

00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>That's true in every marriage.</v>

00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Even if you have a very good marriage, there's still going to</v>

00:26:09.280 --> 00:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be days that are difficult.</v>

00:26:11.120 --> 00:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>There are going to be things you have to work through together.</v>

00:26:14.000 --> 00:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>There are going to be problems.</v>

00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality of living in a fallen world.</v>

00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You're fallen, she's fallen.</v>

00:26:21.040 --> 00:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Together you have to work through some things.</v>

00:26:23.680 --> 00:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Some women are going to be more work than others, and some</v>

00:26:26.160 --> 00:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be so much that you are just creating a</v>

00:26:29.600 --> 00:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>disaster for yourself in your life.</v>

00:26:32.320 --> 00:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:26:33.520 --> 00:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the aspect of wisdom having to find</v>

00:26:36.480 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the woman who has the potential to be a good wife, but</v>

00:26:39.920 --> 00:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>don't turn down a woman just because she doesn't seem like the</v>

00:26:43.760 --> 00:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>exact perfect image of a wife that you've built up in your</v>

00:26:46.400 --> 00:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>head. Because you're not going to find that perfect image in the</v>

00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>real world.</v>

00:26:50.960 --> 00:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to find a woman who is willing to put in</v>

00:26:54.080 --> 00:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the effort to be a good wife.</v>

00:26:56.640 --> 00:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the woman you want.</v>

00:26:58.320 --> 00:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And there are still a lot of those around.</v>

00:27:01.200 --> 00:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Even if there are, of course, the other kind that are a</v>

00:27:03.920 --> 00:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble, and that's going to depend partly on where you</v>

00:27:06.800 --> 00:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>live in the country.</v>

00:27:07.760 --> 00:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Some areas are better than others, some are certainly worse than others.</v>

00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:27:13.600 --> 00:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just go out there and put in the effort and take some</v>

00:27:16.800 --> 00:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>risks. You may not find her on the first try.</v>

00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It is partly a numbers game.</v>

00:27:22.720 --> 00:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you put in that effort, and do, of course put</v>

00:27:26.240 --> 00:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the effort into yourself as well, you know, make yourself presentable.</v>

00:27:29.680 --> 00:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the best things a guy can do is not I'm</v>

00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying go to the gym six hours a day and get</v>

00:27:35.120 --> 00:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely shredded, right?</v>

00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It would seem a little hypocritical if I said that perhaps, but</v>

00:27:39.920 --> 00:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not that.</v>

00:27:40.960 --> 00:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just stay in decent shape.</v>

00:27:43.120 --> 00:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't be a fat slob, basically.</v>

00:27:45.600 --> 00:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Dress decently, and you'll stand out quite a bit just doing that</v>

00:27:50.080 --> 00:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>since no one dresses well dresses well at all anymore.</v>

00:27:53.360 --> 00:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>If you just wear a button down shirt, you're already ahead of</v>

00:27:56.160 --> 00:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the crowd.</v>

00:27:57.200 --> 00:28:00.160
<v Speaker 1>The bar is pretty low for guys that these days.</v>

00:28:00.160 --> 00:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's extremely low for women, but it's pretty low for guys as</v>

00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>well. Stay in decent shape.</v>

00:28:06.560 --> 00:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Have some ability to talk to women without stumbling all over yourself.</v>

00:28:11.920 --> 00:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is practice.</v>

00:28:13.360 --> 00:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is just developing that confidence.</v>

00:28:16.400 --> 00:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:28:17.840 --> 00:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if you just put in some basic effort and then go out</v>

00:28:20.560 --> 00:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there and take the risk, there's reward to be found.</v>

00:28:25.280 --> 00:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the world is not hopeless.</v>

00:28:26.880 --> 00:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So the guys who think that, oh, there are no good women</v>

00:28:29.840 --> 00:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>left and everyone is terrible and that's not reality.</v>

00:28:34.080 --> 00:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>That's just them and sour grapes.</v>

00:28:36.880 --> 00:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>They are looking at the state of the world and perhaps some</v>

00:28:40.560 --> 00:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of their past experiences many times as that, and just deciding that</v>

00:28:44.320 --> 00:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>everything is hopeless and there's no point.</v>

00:28:47.120 --> 00:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>That's never true.</v>

00:28:48.560 --> 00:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Certainly it's not true today.</v>

00:28:50.320 --> 00:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So there are good women out there.</v>

00:28:52.640 --> 00:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Go find one.</v>

00:28:54.080 --> 00:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she's currently making coff hopefully not this time of night, but</v>

00:28:57.120 --> 00:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe she's currently making coffee.</v>

00:28:58.720 --> 00:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's not that late West Coast, but or she's a</v>

00:29:02.320 --> 00:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>cashier at Kroger.</v>

00:29:04.160 --> 00:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There are good women out there.</v>

00:29:05.760 --> 00:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're looking in the wrong place and maybe you have that</v>

00:29:08.400 --> 00:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>mental image of what you think is perfect that is preventing you</v>

00:29:12.240 --> 00:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>from finding something that will make you very happy for the rest</v>

00:29:15.440 --> 00:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of your life.</v>

00:29:16.320 --> 00:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And do bear in mind, perfect is what you get in the</v>

00:29:19.680 --> 00:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>next life.</v>

00:29:20.640 --> 00:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And someone in the chat said women are malleable.</v>

00:29:22.720 --> 00:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true.</v>

00:29:24.000 --> 00:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You are going to conform her to yourself.</v>

00:29:28.160 --> 00:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So don't start looking for her being exactly what you want because</v>

00:29:33.760 --> 00:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>she Because she's not going to be.</v>

00:29:36.000 --> 00:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You are going to make her into a good wife.</v>

00:29:38.320 --> 00:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is going to be that she is a wife,</v>

00:29:41.440 --> 00:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and so she's going to conform to the role over time.</v>

00:29:44.880 --> 00:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Men and women both change.</v>

00:29:47.600 --> 00:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Women change more than men.</v>

00:29:49.600 --> 00:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's a blessing and a curse.</v>

00:29:51.680 --> 00:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it's a blessing.</v>

00:29:53.360 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>She can become what you want.</v>

00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Just find one who doesn't have the sort of baggage that is</v>

00:29:59.280 --> 00:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>going to destroy the potential.</v>

00:30:02.400 --> 00:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what you can deal with.</v>

00:30:04.160 --> 00:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what you can't handle.</v>

00:30:06.240 --> 00:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Find a woman who has baggage that you can handle and go</v>

00:30:10.720 --> 00:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for it.</v>

00:30:12.080 --> 00:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Part of life is taking risks.</v>

00:30:14.160 --> 00:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes things don't go perfectly.</v>

00:30:16.640 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Generally things don't go perfectly.</v>

00:30:18.960 --> 00:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But perfect isn't the goal.</v>

00:30:21.040 --> 00:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The goal is sort of good enough.</v>

00:30:22.560 --> 00:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not that I'm telling you to settle, it's I'm telling you</v>

00:30:25.360 --> 00:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to look at life realistically.</v>

00:30:27.920 --> 00:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to find perfection, particularly not in human relationships, so</v>

00:30:34.160 --> 00:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go out and try.</v>

00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll be surprised at sort of the ease with which</v>

00:30:38.960 --> 00:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you can find sufficient success.</v>

00:30:42.000 --> 00:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And also bear in mind you only have to succeed once.</v>

00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you have to succeed a thousand times, you have</v>

00:30:48.960 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to find one woman you can tolerate for sixty years.</v>

00:30:53.680 --> 00:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>You can probably do that.</v>

00:31:00.400 --> 00:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone said her having a job can be a red flag.</v>

00:31:03.040 --> 00:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It depends.</v>

00:31:04.240 --> 00:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You know You know, the reality of the society and the economy</v>

00:31:07.760 --> 00:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in which we live, a lot of women are going to have</v>

00:31:10.240 --> 00:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a job.</v>

00:31:11.360 --> 00:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to depend in part on the kind of job.</v>

00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So if she's a barista or a cashier or anything like that,</v>

00:31:19.360 --> 00:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a red flag.</v>

00:31:21.680 --> 00:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>If she is a high ranking executive in a tech firm, then</v>

00:31:27.520 --> 00:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>well, first off, she's probably in her forties, but second, yeah, that's</v>

00:31:30.720 --> 00:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>probably a red flag.</v>

00:31:32.320 --> 00:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But matter of wisdom.</v>

00:31:34.320 --> 00:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Use the wisdom God has given you.</v>

00:31:36.480 --> 00:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>These days a woman having a job, I don't think it's a</v>

00:31:38.960 --> 00:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>red flag.</v>

00:31:39.920 --> 00:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to find a woman who doesn't.</v>

00:31:42.160 --> 00:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And quite frankly, all women do.</v>

00:31:43.760 --> 00:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Being a wife is a job.</v>

00:31:45.120 --> 00:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of work.</v>

00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Keeping a home, cooking, cleaning, all those things, that's a lot of</v>

00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>work. That's a lot of hours per day.</v>

00:31:52.080 --> 00:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of the things that's so terrible about feminism because</v>

00:31:54.720 --> 00:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it took the women out of the home, which means that all</v>

00:31:57.280 --> 00:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that work that should be done in the home, there was no</v>

00:32:00.080 --> 00:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one around to do it.</v>

00:32:01.520 --> 00:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all it did.</v>

00:32:02.720 --> 00:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It made everyone more miserable and made everything worse.</v>

00:32:05.920 --> 00:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of a an aside though, so I'll leave that perhaps</v>

00:32:09.680 --> 00:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for another time.</v>

00:32:12.800 --> 00:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The next question sort of shifting gears here a I guess a</v>

00:32:17.760 --> 00:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>theological question one could call it.</v>

00:32:19.840 --> 00:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It's about casting lots.</v>

00:32:21.840 --> 00:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have the specific wording that the gentleman used.</v>

00:32:28.560 --> 00:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Pull that up.</v>

00:32:36.480 --> 00:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>That may be the fullness of the wording that I have.</v>

00:32:42.480 --> 00:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So I will just comment on it generally then.</v>

00:32:44.800 --> 00:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, we have the example in the New Testament of casting lots</v>

00:32:48.560 --> 00:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to replace replace Judas, right?</v>

00:32:52.960 --> 00:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Now do note they narrow it down to two men first.</v>

00:32:58.640 --> 00:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't just break out the dice and throw them and go</v>

00:33:03.360 --> 00:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for broke, right?</v>

00:33:04.720 --> 00:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They narrow it down to two men, and basically they're in a</v>

00:33:08.160 --> 00:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>position where they're going, we can't decide between A and B.</v>

00:33:12.320 --> 00:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't know which of these two men, both of whom are</v>

00:33:15.120 --> 00:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>qualified, we don't know which one to choose.</v>

00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And so they cast lots.</v>

00:33:20.960 --> 00:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything wrong with that.</v>

00:33:23.440 --> 00:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know part of it of course is going to be</v>

00:33:26.800 --> 00:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>why, we do have the New Testament example, of course, but two,</v>

00:33:30.800 --> 00:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Western European, and we definitely have a very strong conception of</v>

00:33:36.240 --> 00:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fate in our cultures, and I don't think that that's a wrong</v>

00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>way to look at the world.</v>

00:33:41.760 --> 00:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that relying on lots for something like that</v>

00:33:46.640 --> 00:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is impermissible for Christians.</v>

00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we can certainly do that.</v>

00:33:50.160 --> 00:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest part of the reason we don't do it</v>

00:33:52.240 --> 00:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>today is Today is we just don't need it.</v>

00:33:55.120 --> 00:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>How often does it come down to A or B for an</v>

00:33:59.760 --> 00:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>important decision?</v>

00:34:00.800 --> 00:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about which restaurant you go to tonight, but when</v>

00:34:04.560 --> 00:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to picking which person is going to replace Judas</v>

00:34:07.520 --> 00:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have two equally qualified men, that almost never happens.</v>

00:34:11.600 --> 00:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So you almost never have to cast lots.</v>

00:34:14.080 --> 00:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you came down to A versus B and</v>

00:34:18.160 --> 00:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't really know what to do, I think it's totally fine</v>

00:34:20.560 --> 00:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to flip a coin.</v>

00:34:21.840 --> 00:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>If you are going to call a pastor for your church and</v>

00:34:25.680 --> 00:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>somehow miraculously, and I think in this case it actually is, you</v>

00:34:30.320 --> 00:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>manage to find two candidates who are equally qualified and you can't</v>

00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>possibly decide between them, go ahead and break out a coin.</v>

00:34:38.160 --> 00:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and do the sort of easy version of casting lots.</v>

00:34:41.680 --> 00:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's completely fine for Christians to do.</v>

00:34:44.080 --> 00:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's testing God.</v>

00:34:45.760 --> 00:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's mocking God.</v>

00:34:47.360 --> 00:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's impermissibly leaving things up to, you know, the</v>

00:34:50.880 --> 00:34:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fates uppercase F relying on the gods of chance.</v>

00:34:54.240 --> 00:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just recognizing that sometimes in life you wind up</v>

00:34:58.960 --> 00:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in a position where you have equally good or equally bad, hopefully</v>

00:35:03.280 --> 00:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the former not the latter, but you have equal choices and you</v>

00:35:07.600 --> 00:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to choose.</v>

00:35:09.280 --> 00:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Leaving it up to fate is fine.</v>

00:35:11.600 --> 00:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and flip the coin.</v>

00:35:13.680 --> 00:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Make it a challenge coin if you're so inclined.</v>

00:35:16.080 --> 00:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>A little harder to flip, but a little more interesting for those</v>

00:35:19.840 --> 00:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>observing what you're doing.</v>

00:35:24.560 --> 00:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, the next one is sort of a follow-up question.</v>

00:35:29.120 --> 00:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I commented very briefly on the stock market and said that I</v>

00:35:33.600 --> 00:35:36.720
<v Speaker 1>am not invested in the stock market, which is true.</v>

00:35:36.720 --> 00:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't hold any stock.</v>

00:35:38.800 --> 00:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I hold any stock whatsoever.</v>

00:35:41.120 --> 00:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Unless there is maybe a small exception somewhere, you know, companies occasionally,</v>

00:35:45.200 --> 00:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if you buy something, they'll give you like one stock as a</v>

00:35:48.480 --> 00:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a throwaway thing they put in the box.</v>

00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I have something like that somewhere.</v>

00:35:52.960 --> 00:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any deliberately purchased stock or investment in the stock</v>

00:35:56.880 --> 00:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>market, other than I do have</v>

00:36:00.400 --> 00:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a money market account.</v>

00:36:02.480 --> 00:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So I do have a savings account that is technically an investment</v>

00:36:05.760 --> 00:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market.</v>

00:36:06.640 --> 00:36:08.720
<v Speaker 1>That's as close as I get.</v>

00:36:08.720 --> 00:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So I did say my objection is not to all investment.</v>

00:36:13.520 --> 00:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's all wrong.</v>

00:36:14.880 --> 00:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say you can't do that.</v>

00:36:16.240 --> 00:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say it's anti Christian.</v>

00:36:18.400 --> 00:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I would abolish those things under an ideal system, but Christians do</v>

00:36:24.080 --> 00:36:25.280
<v Speaker 1>have to live in the world.</v>

00:36:25.280 --> 00:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>We can't just say the world isn't perfect, and so I refuse</v>

00:36:28.720 --> 00:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to live in the world.</v>

00:36:29.840 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't work.</v>

00:36:30.880 --> 00:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That would be like saying, Well, this food in front of me</v>

00:36:34.960 --> 00:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is not absolutely 100% pure and perfect, and so I'm going to</v>

00:36:39.120 --> 00:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>starve to death.</v>

00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>That would certainly not be exercising the wisdom and the judgment that</v>

00:36:44.400 --> 00:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>God has given you.</v>

00:36:45.680 --> 00:36:48.240
<v Speaker 1>That would be horrible foolishness.</v>

00:36:48.240 --> 00:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true with regard to how you manage your</v>

00:36:51.840 --> 00:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>money. That's one of the resources that God has given you.</v>

00:36:54.720 --> 00:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And so managing your money is something that you have to do</v>

00:36:58.640 --> 00:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>wisely as a Christian.</v>

00:37:01.680 --> 00:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So how do you do that?</v>

00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Again, I'm not going to say that you can't invest</v>

00:37:07.760 --> 00:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market.</v>

00:37:09.120 --> 00:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly do that.</v>

00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't become obsessed with it, right?</v>

00:37:13.920 --> 00:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Because some guys sort of use that as a proxy for gambling</v>

00:37:16.560 --> 00:37:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes a problem.</v>

00:37:17.760 --> 00:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a different sort of pro thing.</v>

00:37:19.440 --> 00:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that.</v>

00:37:21.280 --> 00:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But But these days, personally, my firm recommendation would just be invest</v>

00:37:26.880 --> 00:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in things that are a little more tangible because the state of</v>

00:37:31.120 --> 00:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the world is such that I think I would probably rather have</v>

00:37:36.080 --> 00:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a really well situated personal family compound, so animals, a garden,</v>

00:37:44.080 --> 00:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>all the sorts of things you need to be self-sustaining to some</v>

00:37:47.120 --> 00:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>degree. I'm not saying be</v>

00:37:48.800 --> 00:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know crazy prepper fifteen years worth of food in the basement</v>

00:37:52.720 --> 00:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing.</v>

00:37:53.840 --> 00:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Because there's a balancing of relying on God and exercising the wisdom</v>

00:37:58.560 --> 00:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and using the resources he gave you wisely.</v>

00:38:01.440 --> 00:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that most people would benefit from more concrete</v>

00:38:06.400 --> 00:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>investments. And so do bear do bear in mind when someone says</v>

00:38:10.320 --> 00:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>investment, it doesn't just mean stocks, bonds, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:38:15.200 --> 00:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't just mean the market.</v>

00:38:17.200 --> 00:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Building a greenhouse is an investment.</v>

00:38:20.400 --> 00:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can spend some number of hundreds or you can</v>

00:38:24.000 --> 00:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>spend twenty thousand dollars on a greenhouse.</v>

00:38:27.280 --> 00:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>At any level, that's an investment.</v>

00:38:30.560 --> 00:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you can manage to produce some of your family's food,</v>

00:38:33.680 --> 00:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's an investment in their future as well.</v>

00:38:35.680 --> 00:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Because even if things continue, even if things go really well, right?</v>

00:38:41.840 --> 00:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's say everything goes great.</v>

00:38:44.400 --> 00:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We manage to win politically, the problems are solved peacefully, we don't</v>

00:38:50.560 --> 00:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have any of the bad outcomes.</v>

00:38:53.200 --> 00:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go ahead and decline to list those, but let's say</v>

00:38:56.080 --> 00:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we have none of the bad outcomes.</v>

00:38:58.000 --> 00:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you worse off for having built the greenhouse?</v>

00:39:02.240 --> 00:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The answer is no.</v>

00:39:03.680 --> 00:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I know someone's going to say, well, the opportunity cost and you</v>

00:39:05.920 --> 00:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>could have done X, Y, and Z with the money.</v>

00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Sure. But your family's going to benefit from the greenhouse.</v>

00:39:13.200 --> 00:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>There's not just the better food.</v>

00:39:15.680 --> 00:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>There's not just the certainty of that food.</v>

00:39:18.960 --> 00:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also the fact that it's good for you to go out</v>

00:39:21.040 --> 00:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and get your hands dirty.</v>

00:39:22.640 --> 00:39:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think investing in sort of those concrete things is something</v>

00:39:26.720 --> 00:39:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that is often neglected, but something that would be far more</v>

00:39:31.120 --> 00:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>beneficial these days.</v>

00:39:33.440 --> 00:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It is something that I think is a good option, not necessarily</v>

00:39:37.360 --> 00:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>an alternative, but sort of something to add to your portfolio.</v>

00:39:41.360 --> 00:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't just think of your investment options as buying more stock or</v>

00:39:47.200 --> 00:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know cryptocurrency, and I have thoughts on that, but don't think</v>

00:39:52.560 --> 00:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of that as your only option, those as your only options Remember</v>

00:39:56.960 --> 00:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there are other things you can do with your money that are</v>

00:39:59.600 --> 00:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>also investing.</v>

00:40:01.200 --> 00:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You can invest in a local business, you can invest in your</v>

00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>land, you can acquire more land.</v>

00:40:08.400 --> 00:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>There are all sorts of things that you can do.</v>

00:40:10.080 --> 00:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It just depends</v>

00:40:11.440 --> 00:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on the amount of money that has been entrusted to your care</v>

00:40:15.280 --> 00:40:16.240
<v Speaker 1>by God.</v>

00:40:16.240 --> 00:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So basically, your liquid cash and also your abilities.</v>

00:40:22.080 --> 00:40:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're a truly terrible farmer.</v>

00:40:24.720 --> 00:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>If no one in your family has a green thumb, and no</v>

00:40:28.640 --> 00:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>matter how hard you've tried you can't manage to grow even tomatoes,</v>

00:40:32.480 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>then maybe the greenhouse isn't the best option in your case.</v>

00:40:36.960 --> 00:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>As an aside, basically everyone can grow some produce, no matter how</v>

00:40:41.440 --> 00:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bad you think you are at it.</v>

00:40:43.600 --> 00:40:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So just keep those concrete things in mind.</v>

00:40:46.240 --> 00:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>They're a very good option.</v>

00:40:47.360 --> 00:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>option and they're often neglected these days.</v>

00:40:50.640 --> 00:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take a sip of my tea.</v>

00:40:52.640 --> 00:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for those who liked it, I didn't go at the ambiance</v>

00:40:56.320 --> 00:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the teapot, the candle in the background this time because I</v>

00:41:00.880 --> 00:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was out and about today so I made tea in a thermos.</v>

00:41:08.400 --> 00:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Which actually does just about as good of a chance a job,</v>

00:41:11.760 --> 00:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>rather, of keeping it warm.</v>

00:41:14.400 --> 00:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:41:16.720 --> 00:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Despite appearances I am not sponsored by Hydra Flask.</v>

00:41:20.560 --> 00:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So the next question here</v>

00:41:25.040 --> 00:41:27.760
<v Speaker 1>What are my thoughts on Satan's little season?</v>

00:41:27.760 --> 00:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that is referring to Revelation and the interpretation, the exegesis</v>

00:41:32.320 --> 00:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of Revelation.</v>

00:41:33.840 --> 00:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a tribulation.</v>

00:41:36.640 --> 00:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Satan is released for a short period of time</v>

00:41:40.480 --> 00:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the church age.</v>

00:41:42.720 --> 00:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And I don't necessarily want to get deeply into eschatology in the</v>

00:41:47.120 --> 00:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>timeline here.</v>

00:41:48.240 --> 00:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I've done that elsewhere.</v>

00:41:49.600 --> 00:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We did it on stone choir, so I think I would just</v>

00:41:52.160 --> 00:41:55.280
<v Speaker 1>recommend you look at those resources.</v>

00:41:55.280 --> 00:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And the Lutheran stance on this is also very accessible, very wide</v>

00:42:00.480 --> 00:42:01.280
<v Speaker 1>widely known.</v>

00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Many people have commented on it, so you can of course look</v>

00:42:03.200 --> 00:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at that and I don't deviate from the general Lutheran stance on</v>

00:42:06.320 --> 00:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this, so there's nothing specific for me to say.</v>

00:42:10.560 --> 00:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The basic outline is this.</v>

00:42:13.440 --> 00:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You have the church age, and I'm not going to deal with</v>

00:42:16.880 --> 00:42:20.720
<v Speaker 1>things before the church age because it's not relevant to the question.</v>

00:42:20.720 --> 00:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The church age begins either at the resurrection or at Pentecost.</v>

00:42:26.880 --> 00:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It really doesn't matter when you pick there because you know a</v>

00:42:29.280 --> 00:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>difference of a very short period of time.</v>

00:42:31.360 --> 00:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Hardly Hardly matters.</v>

00:42:32.400 --> 00:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It begins in the New Testament era, the beginning of the New</v>

00:42:37.200 --> 00:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Testament church.</v>

00:42:38.560 --> 00:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And then the church age runs until the second coming.</v>

00:42:43.680 --> 00:42:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Or if you want to say it ends at the tribulation, fine.</v>

00:42:46.720 --> 00:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really there's sort of an overlap there.</v>

00:42:49.920 --> 00:42:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the thousand years.</v>

00:42:52.320 --> 00:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>One thousand being a number of perfection, because what is one thousand?</v>

00:42:55.440 --> 00:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Ten's a number of completion, it's ten cubed cubed, three Trinity God.</v>

00:43:00.000 --> 00:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously the Cliff Notes version of this, but one thousand</v>

00:43:04.240 --> 00:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is a number of perfection.</v>

00:43:05.360 --> 00:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You can think of this also in terms of God saying that</v>

00:43:08.880 --> 00:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he owns the cattle on a thousand hills.</v>

00:43:11.360 --> 00:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't own the cattle on a literal thousand hills because he</v>

00:43:14.800 --> 00:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>owns all of the cattle.</v>

00:43:16.160 --> 00:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And so a thousand is a number of perfection, number of completion.</v>

00:43:19.360 --> 00:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The church age is the period during which you have the in-gathering</v>

00:43:23.040 --> 00:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the New Testament church.</v>

00:43:25.120 --> 00:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end of that, Satan is basically let off</v>

00:43:29.200 --> 00:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his chain for a little while to be terrible.</v>

00:43:31.840 --> 00:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the tribulation.</v>

00:43:33.600 --> 00:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Seven again is a symbolic number.</v>

00:43:35.440 --> 00:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily literally seven years.</v>

00:43:37.680 --> 00:43:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it is.</v>

00:43:38.720 --> 00:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Hardly matters.</v>

00:43:40.240 --> 00:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a period of tribulation, and then the second coming.</v>

00:43:43.920 --> 00:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>That's it.</v>

00:43:44.720 --> 00:43:49.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no rapture, there's no you know, earthly rain, all these other</v>

00:43:49.760 --> 00:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>things that are various forms of chiliastic theories, millenarianism, whichever term you</v>

00:43:56.480 --> 00:43:58.720
<v Speaker 1>want to use, Greek versus Latin.</v>

00:43:58.720 --> 00:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not really part of it.</v>

00:44:00.960 --> 00:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>That comes from reading parts of scripture that are are not literal,</v>

00:44:05.600 --> 00:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as if they were literal, and then turning parts of scripture that</v>

00:44:09.520 --> 00:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>are literal into symbolism.</v>

00:44:12.480 --> 00:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to know the kind of book you're reading.</v>

00:44:15.120 --> 00:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Genesis is history.</v>

00:44:17.280 --> 00:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You read history literally.</v>

00:44:19.920 --> 00:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>There's some symbolism in there, of course, obviously, but it is a</v>

00:44:24.400 --> 00:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>literal recounting of history with symbolic elements.</v>

00:44:28.560 --> 00:44:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Revelation is not.</v>

00:44:30.560 --> 00:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it even says it isn't, because Revelation is a symbolic book.</v>

00:44:35.120 --> 00:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It is an eschatological book.</v>

00:44:36.880 --> 00:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It is an apocalyptic book.</v>

00:44:38.640 --> 00:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to interpret it in a different way.</v>

00:44:41.520 --> 00:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>But so the basic version is that yes, there's a little season,</v>

00:44:44.800 --> 00:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just Satan is allowed to be particularly terrible for a period</v>

00:44:48.880 --> 00:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of time near the end of things, culminating in the second coming.</v>

00:44:53.120 --> 00:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of the reason, of course, that Lutherans and others</v>

00:44:56.080 --> 00:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>will say there's no rapture because that would be the second coming,</v>

00:44:59.600 --> 00:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the second coming would be the third.</v>

00:45:03.120 --> 00:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't work.</v>

00:45:04.560 --> 00:45:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's the short version of that.</v>

00:45:11.280 --> 00:45:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked me sort of basic question about Wells, which is the</v>

00:45:16.720 --> 00:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod.</v>

00:45:19.200 --> 00:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the other Lutheran Synod in the U.S, and I know there</v>

00:45:22.480 --> 00:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to be people who object to that because there's some</v>

00:45:24.400 --> 00:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny microsynods, but it's not the point.</v>

00:45:27.200 --> 00:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You have the LCMS and Wells.</v>

00:45:29.280 --> 00:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And they asked what are some problems with Wells or why would</v>

00:45:32.720 --> 00:45:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I object to Wells?</v>

00:45:33.920 --> 00:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't have any objections to Wells other than their doctrine</v>

00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the ministry is wrong, which is why you have the split</v>

00:45:41.360 --> 00:45:44.240
<v Speaker 1>between the LCMS and Wells, but that's inside baseball.</v>

00:45:44.240 --> 00:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Most people aren't going to care, and it's sort of hyper technical</v>

00:45:47.120 --> 00:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and Wells is just obviously wrong.</v>

00:45:51.280 --> 00:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:45:52.720 --> 00:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I would tell people you're not going to avoid</v>

00:45:55.920 --> 00:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the problems the LCMS has if you go Wells is because Is</v>

00:45:59.280 --> 00:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>because the way the structure works in Wells, they are going to</v>

00:46:03.200 --> 00:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>speedrun the problems in the LCMS, and they are going to probably</v>

00:46:07.360 --> 00:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wind up worse.</v>

00:46:09.360 --> 00:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And they're going to do it, like I said, more quickly.</v>

00:46:12.800 --> 00:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you can find a good wells congregation, go ahead and</v>

00:46:16.880 --> 00:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>attend. I think that their obviously their doctrine of the ministry is</v>

00:46:21.280 --> 00:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong, but I don't think that endangers your soul.</v>

00:46:24.800 --> 00:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something for the theologians and others to argue about</v>

00:46:28.960 --> 00:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully come to some resolution.</v>

00:46:30.720 --> 00:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Realistically they won't, because we're going to wind up forming a new</v>

00:46:33.360 --> 00:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>synod. But if you find a good congregation, you're fine.</v>

00:46:38.720 --> 00:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Because Wells, like the LCMS, is congregationalist in its polity.</v>

00:46:43.520 --> 00:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if synod, if the corporate structure tells the congregation to</v>

00:46:49.040 --> 00:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do something, they have They have the option of just saying no</v>

00:46:52.000 --> 00:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you and then leaving.</v>

00:46:53.520 --> 00:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to leave the synod, but that is something you can</v>

00:46:57.120 --> 00:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do because you probably own your building.</v>

00:46:59.920 --> 00:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Which is the advantage that you have if you have a congregationalist</v>

00:47:04.080 --> 00:47:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this is lowercase c polity, not theology, but polity, you probably own</v>

00:47:08.800 --> 00:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>your building, you probably own or you know at least rent your</v>

00:47:11.840 --> 00:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>land, rent your building, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:47:15.200 --> 00:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Your bishop equivalent doesn't own it.</v>

00:47:18.160 --> 00:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So they can't use that to force you to stay.</v>

00:47:22.160 --> 00:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you find a good Wells church, go ahead and attend</v>

00:47:24.960 --> 00:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it. If you find a good LCMS church, go ahead and attend</v>

00:47:27.600 --> 00:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it. If you have a problem</v>

00:47:30.640 --> 00:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know something</v>

00:47:33.920 --> 00:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>your local bishop equivalent or your synod starts to do, then you're</v>

00:47:38.880 --> 00:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have to work to have that congregation leave that corporate</v>

00:47:42.160 --> 00:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>body. And that's completely fine.</v>

00:47:44.720 --> 00:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And then once you have a faithful corporate body somewhere, you can</v>

00:47:48.080 --> 00:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and join that one.</v>

00:47:49.520 --> 00:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So short answer is go ahead, join Wells.</v>

00:47:52.400 --> 00:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They have the same problems as the LCMS, but they're congregationalist, so</v>

00:47:57.040 --> 00:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly find a congregation that is good if you happen</v>

00:48:01.200 --> 00:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be in an area where you have a good congregation.</v>

00:48:04.960 --> 00:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to depend.</v>

00:48:06.000 --> 00:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Some areas of the country have basically no Lutherans, right?</v>

00:48:10.080 --> 00:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And so there you are going to have to start a home</v>

00:48:13.120 --> 00:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>church. But if you live in parts of the country that have</v>

00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Lutheran churches, I'm not going to say you can't go to Wells.</v>

00:48:19.120 --> 00:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Wells is fine.</v>

00:48:20.000 --> 00:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>The LCM even the LCMS is fine.</v>

00:48:21.600 --> 00:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say the LCMS is if you join it</v>

00:48:25.280 --> 00:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you're damned, right?</v>

00:48:26.000 --> 00:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say that.</v>

00:48:27.120 --> 00:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Because they're good congregations.</v>

00:48:29.360 --> 00:48:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But you have to make that assessment.</v>

00:48:31.280 --> 00:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You're not just going to be able to go, oh, it says</v>

00:48:33.200 --> 00:48:35.280
<v Speaker 1>LCMS, they must be faithful Lutherans.</v>

00:48:35.280 --> 00:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That's no longer true.</v>

00:48:36.640 --> 00:48:39.360
<v Speaker 1>The same for Wells.</v>

00:48:39.360 --> 00:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I will get to super chats and things like that.</v>

00:48:44.320 --> 00:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And I do always note down the or at least attempt to</v>

00:48:48.000 --> 00:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make a blanket statement because perhaps I'll miss</v>

00:48:50.480 --> 00:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>them in the chat.</v>

00:48:52.080 --> 00:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But I do try to note down questions from the chat and</v>

00:48:54.960 --> 00:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>then answer them usually in future episodes because usually by the time</v>

00:48:58.400 --> 00:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I get around to those I can answer a couple at most</v>

00:49:00.960 --> 00:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at most before I run out of time for the particular episode.</v>

00:49:05.600 --> 00:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Not because I'm limited on time as it were, but because, again,</v>

00:49:08.640 --> 00:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I've explained, I don't want these to really run over an hour</v>

00:49:12.400 --> 00:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>each week, for various reasons.</v>

00:49:17.120 --> 00:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The next question is about</v>

00:49:20.560 --> 00:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how to improve American birth rates.</v>

00:49:24.320 --> 00:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that means for actual Americans, this is it someone asking</v>

00:49:28.400 --> 00:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about the American race, not about people who happen to be living</v>

00:49:31.840 --> 00:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the country that is called America, because America is the nation.</v>

00:49:35.600 --> 00:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The United States is the country.</v>

00:49:38.240 --> 00:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Distinction there.</v>

00:49:39.440 --> 00:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We've gone over that at length for Stone Choir, so people can</v>

00:49:42.640 --> 00:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>go and listen to that if they have questions about those, or</v>

00:49:45.440 --> 00:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps I'll address at some point in the future.</v>

00:49:47.520 --> 00:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's worth repeating.</v>

00:49:49.040 --> 00:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the This is the one that is related to the earlier question</v>

00:49:56.320 --> 00:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>about basically how do you go out and find a wife.</v>

00:50:00.480 --> 00:50:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The issue with regard to the birth rates</v>

00:50:04.240 --> 00:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is multifaceted.</v>

00:50:06.000 --> 00:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>A big part of it is that the economy has been destroyed</v>

00:50:11.680 --> 00:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for actual Americans.</v>

00:50:13.600 --> 00:50:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:50:15.200 --> 00:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have the economic ability, the wherewithal, the means to</v>

00:50:22.560 --> 00:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>raise a bunch of children, you are going to have people have</v>

00:50:25.920 --> 00:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>fewer children because people actually do respond to economic ins incentives to</v>

00:50:30.640 --> 00:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree.</v>

00:50:32.000 --> 00:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So So someone who is having trouble making rent is probably not</v>

00:50:38.800 --> 00:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to try to have six or seven children.</v>

00:50:42.640 --> 00:50:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So you have to address those issues.</v>

00:50:44.720 --> 00:50:47.440
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the things that needs to be addressed.</v>

00:50:47.440 --> 00:50:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump actually just did something that I'm willing to say he did</v>

00:50:50.480 --> 00:50:52.720
<v Speaker 1>something good when he does something good.</v>

00:50:52.720 --> 00:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm certainly willing to say he does something bad when he</v>

00:50:54.800 --> 00:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>does that as well.</v>

00:50:55.920 --> 00:51:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But he's recently been talking about capping interest on credit cards and</v>

00:51:00.240 --> 00:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>prohibiting the ownership of single family homes by large corporations, investment firms,</v>

00:51:05.200 --> 00:51:06.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that.</v>

00:51:06.640 --> 00:51:08.720
<v Speaker 1>That is very good.</v>

00:51:08.720 --> 00:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That is exactly what we should be doing.</v>

00:51:11.920 --> 00:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I would, of course, say abolish interest, but that's sort of a</v>

00:51:14.640 --> 00:51:18.320
<v Speaker 1>more radical step, a little more difficult to take, certainly when you</v>

00:51:18.320 --> 00:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have certain backers.</v>

00:51:19.920 --> 00:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:51:22.160 --> 00:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if we make single-family homes, or even if they're they don't have</v>

00:51:27.040 --> 00:51:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily be single-family homes, I don't object to nice apartment buildings,</v>

00:51:31.280 --> 00:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance.</v>

00:51:32.000 --> 00:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I lived in an apartment in California, I lived in an apartment</v>

00:51:34.480 --> 00:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in Berlin.</v>

00:51:34.880 --> 00:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't object to apartments.</v>

00:51:36.560 --> 00:51:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they can be done very well, and they can be</v>

00:51:39.120 --> 00:51:42.480
<v Speaker 1>suitable even for families with, say, two or three children.</v>

00:51:42.480 --> 00:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Once you start to get more children than that, then you probably</v>

00:51:45.120 --> 00:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>want a single family home, or a multi generational family home, which</v>

00:51:49.360 --> 00:51:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is obviously even better.</v>

00:51:51.280 --> 00:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>If your parents or even grandparents live with you and help you</v>

00:51:54.480 --> 00:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise the children, do things like that, various tasks around the</v>

00:51:57.680 --> 00:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>home. And then you can care for your grandparents as they age.</v>

00:52:00.640 --> 00:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That is a more natural way for human beings to live.</v>

00:52:03.680 --> 00:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>The isolated, atomized, immediate nuclear family home and no one else is</v>

00:52:10.320 --> 00:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>very unusual historically.</v>

00:52:12.560 --> 00:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of anti-human.</v>

00:52:14.080 --> 00:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not what you want.</v>

00:52:15.040 --> 00:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But to sort of return to the question, if we make it</v>

00:52:19.040 --> 00:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so that these homes are more accessible, whatever form they happen to</v>

00:52:22.480 --> 00:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>take, but we make them more accessible for Americans, then you can</v>

00:52:27.520 --> 00:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>remove one of those hurdles.</v>

00:52:29.680 --> 00:52:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's particularly a mental hurdle, but it's not entirely a mental hurdle</v>

00:52:32.960 --> 00:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because it is a real hurdle.</v>

00:52:34.480 --> 00:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>If you can barely afford housing, then wisdom is going to tell</v>

00:52:38.880 --> 00:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you maybe you shouldn't have a bunch of children right now.</v>

00:52:42.000 --> 00:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem is you only have a certain number a year, particularly</v>

00:52:44.480 --> 00:52:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as a woman, obviously.</v>

00:52:45.760 --> 00:52:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You have a certain number of years.</v>

00:52:47.760 --> 00:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You probably got about fifteen, sixteen years during which you can have</v>

00:52:50.560 --> 00:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>children. Maybe a little more, maybe a little less.</v>

00:52:53.120 --> 00:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But right about there.</v>

00:52:54.480 --> 00:52:55.280
<v Speaker 1>That's limited.</v>

00:52:56.080 --> 00:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>If you are scrambling to try to make rent and student loan</v>

00:53:01.360 --> 00:53:04.720
<v Speaker 1>payments which are deeply accursed and the short answer there is they</v>

00:53:04.720 --> 00:53:05.840
<v Speaker 1>should just be abolished.</v>

00:53:05.840 --> 00:53:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Period. Wipe the slate clean, be done with it.</v>

00:53:08.480 --> 00:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That would be a huge step in the right direction.</v>

00:53:11.600 --> 00:53:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you can't make these payments, if you have these problems,</v>

00:53:16.240 --> 00:53:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you are going to have more trouble convincing yourself that you should</v>

00:53:20.320 --> 00:53:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have children.</v>

00:53:21.680 --> 00:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You're probably going to take steps to not have children, and then</v>

00:53:25.040 --> 00:53:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be scrambling for money and all these things for</v>

00:53:28.720 --> 00:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>these dwindling number of years during which you can have children.</v>

00:53:33.040 --> 00:53:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you're going to wind up with two or three instead</v>

00:53:37.280 --> 00:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of six.</v>

00:53:38.960 --> 00:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that we should necessarily be aiming at you</v>

00:53:42.160 --> 00:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know infinite growth and have forty billion people on the planet, that's</v>

00:53:45.040 --> 00:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not what I'm saying.</v>

00:53:46.560 --> 00:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think we should have more Americans.</v>

00:53:49.520 --> 00:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think we should have more Europeans, and I think we</v>

00:53:51.920 --> 00:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>need to increase our fertility rate to do that.</v>

00:53:54.400 --> 00:53:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is getting rid of the pernicious debts that are</v>

00:53:59.360 --> 00:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>student loans.</v>

00:54:00.560 --> 00:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know some people object to that, but when you look</v>

00:54:03.120 --> 00:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers, it's pretty obvious that we have to do it,</v>

00:54:07.200 --> 00:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>or we are shooting ourselves in the foot to vastly understate things.</v>

00:54:12.960 --> 00:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>A significant percentage</v>

00:54:16.240 --> 00:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of American women in their fertile years have student loans.</v>

00:54:23.360 --> 00:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>That is going to stall family formation.</v>

00:54:26.960 --> 00:54:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It is going to delay at the absolute least having children.</v>

00:54:31.760 --> 00:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It is going to delay at the absolute least purchasing a home.</v>

00:54:36.080 --> 00:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And all these other milestones</v>

00:54:38.480 --> 00:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that lead toward having that stable environment in which people are more</v>

00:54:42.560 --> 00:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>inclined to have children.</v>

00:54:43.680 --> 00:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about incentives, or perhaps as economists would say, nudges, although</v>

00:54:47.920 --> 00:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in this case the pretty big nudges, you have to take these</v>

00:54:51.360 --> 00:54:52.720
<v Speaker 1>things into account.</v>

00:54:52.720 --> 00:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>If we don't have proper policies in place, we're going to continue</v>

00:54:57.600 --> 00:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to see this abysmally low fertility rate.</v>

00:55:01.520 --> 00:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So part of it we could just basically borrow things from the</v>

00:55:05.360 --> 00:55:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Third Reich.</v>

00:55:06.800 --> 00:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you have X number of children, your home loan is</v>

00:55:11.200 --> 00:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>forgiven. So you forgive some percentage, whatever it is, twenty, twenty-five, some</v>

00:55:15.920 --> 00:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the loan for each child.</v>

00:55:19.040 --> 00:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense.</v>

00:55:20.160 --> 00:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing.</v>

00:55:21.520 --> 00:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also help young families with things like their first car.</v>

00:55:26.320 --> 00:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Or education if someone needs training in order to</v>

00:55:30.800 --> 00:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>get a better job, in order to support more children.</v>

00:55:34.000 --> 00:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>These are things that a functioning society should have.</v>

00:55:38.080 --> 00:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me.</v>

00:55:38.880 --> 00:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And I know that some people object and say, oh, it's socialism</v>

00:55:41.520 --> 00:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course it is.</v>

00:55:43.920 --> 00:55:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a bad thing.</v>

00:55:45.760 --> 00:55:49.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason it's not a bad thing is because you've just been</v>

00:55:49.840 --> 00:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>taught that word is bad.</v>

00:55:51.680 --> 00:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Call it communitarianism if you don't like the word socialism.</v>

00:55:55.040 --> 00:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It is caring for your own people, desiring what is good for</v>

00:55:58.880 --> 00:56:03.280
<v Speaker 1>them, and taking concrete steps toward helping them.</v>

00:56:03.280 --> 00:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>That's just loving your neighbor as yourself.</v>

00:56:06.480 --> 00:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>That's Christianity translated into politics.</v>

00:56:09.920 --> 00:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And no Christian should ever object to any of that.</v>

00:56:13.520 --> 00:56:17.280
<v Speaker 1>You can object to the individual wisdom of individual programs, that's a</v>

00:56:17.280 --> 00:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>different thing.</v>

00:56:18.560 --> 00:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But you can't object to the socialization of</v>

00:56:22.160 --> 00:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all costs, of all programs and things like that.</v>

00:56:26.560 --> 00:56:29.920
<v Speaker 1>We have plenty of them already, to which no one really objects.</v>

00:56:29.920 --> 00:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure there are people out there who think we</v>

00:56:32.000 --> 00:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>should just completely get rid of the Postal Service, but that's often</v>

00:56:35.520 --> 00:56:36.880
<v Speaker 1>libertarian land.</v>

00:56:36.880 --> 00:56:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are the same people who think you can have a market</v>

00:56:38.960 --> 00:56:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for roads, which is insane for many reasons.</v>

00:56:42.960 --> 00:56:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:56:44.560 --> 00:56:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong with having social programs.</v>

00:56:47.120 --> 00:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>As long as they are managed well and achieve the ends toward</v>

00:56:51.200 --> 00:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>which they were aimed, for which they were created.</v>

00:56:53.680 --> 00:56:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So, yes, there should be audits, you should have oversight, these things</v>

00:56:56.960 --> 00:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>should not just be a black hole in which you throw money.</v>

00:57:00.160 --> 00:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are concrete programs we can enact in order to improve</v>

00:57:04.560 --> 00:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly the fertility rate.</v>

00:57:09.040 --> 00:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>On</v>

00:57:10.800 --> 00:57:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a practical and I guess a not so much policy-driven</v>

00:57:14.880 --> 00:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>note, but more of a social note.</v>

00:57:16.880 --> 00:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that needs to be done is older generations</v>

00:57:19.440 --> 00:57:23.440
<v Speaker 1>need to step up and start trying to pair people off.</v>

00:57:23.440 --> 00:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's been part of human culture, human society from the very beginning.</v>

00:57:28.560 --> 00:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>This modern idea that you just have to go out and aimlessly</v>

00:57:32.720 --> 00:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>search for a wife is insane.</v>

00:57:36.240 --> 00:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>No one did that historically.</v>

00:57:38.240 --> 00:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Your parents helped you because historically your parents happen to know the</v>

00:57:41.600 --> 00:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>parents, who had a young woman who was, you know, five years</v>

00:57:44.880 --> 00:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>younger than you.</v>

00:57:46.480 --> 00:57:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Seemed like she'd probably be a good match for you, and then</v>

00:57:48.960 --> 00:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow they magically made it so that you two spent time together.</v>

00:57:52.640 --> 00:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That works really well.</v>

00:57:54.240 --> 00:57:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how things should be done.</v>

00:57:55.600 --> 00:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And so the old ladies at church should be trying to find</v>

00:57:58.880 --> 00:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>wives for the young men at church and trying to find husbands</v>

00:58:01.360 --> 00:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for the young ladies at church.</v>

00:58:02.480 --> 00:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how things are supposed to go.</v>

00:58:04.240 --> 00:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>The older generations have long ago given up on doing that.</v>

00:58:09.680 --> 00:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>They have been negligent in their duty.</v>

00:58:12.240 --> 00:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>They need to be reminded that is one of the things they</v>

00:58:15.040 --> 00:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do as an older generation.</v>

00:58:17.120 --> 00:58:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the things you're supposed to do as an elder.</v>

00:58:19.040 --> 00:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to make sure the next generation starts off on the</v>

00:58:22.000 --> 00:58:22.400
<v Speaker 1>right foot.</v>

00:58:22.400 --> 00:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is certainly getting married.</v>

00:58:24.800 --> 00:58:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the overwhelming majority, the absolutely overwhelming majority of people should be</v>

00:58:31.440 --> 00:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>married. That is the default state.</v>

00:58:34.880 --> 00:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>God says to Adam, It is not good that man should be</v>

00:58:38.000 --> 00:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>alone. And that's Adam walking with God in the garden.</v>

00:58:42.560 --> 00:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you can possibly interpret that except thinking that</v>

00:58:45.360 --> 00:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>marriage is one of the most important things in life and should</v>

00:58:47.920 --> 00:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>be a priority for society.</v>

00:58:51.280 --> 00:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Lutherans in particular can't object to it because we're confessionally</v>

00:58:55.200 --> 00:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>bound in our confession, it says that one of the duties of</v>

00:58:59.200 --> 00:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the state is to ensure that people get married and have children.</v>

00:59:04.160 --> 00:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Not just parents, not just grandparents, not just the church, the state.</v>

00:59:08.960 --> 00:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It goes so far as to say is the prince will be</v>

00:59:11.280 --> 00:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>judged for whether or not he does that.</v>

00:59:13.920 --> 00:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:59:16.400 --> 00:59:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly something that the older generation generations need to be doing.</v>

00:59:22.960 --> 00:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And then I guess</v>

00:59:24.560 --> 00:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one more brief comment would just be sort of the biological reality.</v>

00:59:29.200 --> 00:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of you listening undoubtedly are single and millennial, so perhaps like</v>

00:59:34.240 --> 00:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>me, right?</v>

00:59:35.440 --> 00:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If that is the case, if you're a male and you are</v>

00:59:38.400 --> 00:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>late thirties, early forties, you're going to have to date younger if</v>

00:59:43.200 --> 00:59:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to have children.</v>

00:59:44.800 --> 00:59:47.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to have any number of children, because that's just</v>

00:59:47.200 --> 00:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the biological reality.</v>

00:59:48.480 --> 00:59:49.600
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with that.</v>

00:59:49.600 --> 00:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and date a woman who's 10 years younger.</v>

00:59:51.680 --> 00:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.</v>

00:59:53.520 --> 00:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it ideal?</v>

00:59:54.800 --> 00:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not 10 years is ideal, but we're not dealing with ideal</v>

00:59:58.080 --> 01:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>circumstances. We're dealing with reality as it has been handed to us</v>

01:00:02.080 --> 01:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>by previous generations that were incredibly negligent to say the absolute least.</v>

01:00:07.040 --> 01:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you have to marry a woman who's ten, twelve years</v>

01:00:10.240 --> 01:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>younger than you, so that you can have four, five, six children,</v>

01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>however many God chooses to give you as blessing, then by all</v>

01:00:18.880 --> 01:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>means do that.</v>

01:00:19.920 --> 01:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the biological reality.</v>

01:00:21.840 --> 01:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're forty five and you marry a forty five year old,</v>

01:00:25.040 --> 01:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>chances are you're having no children.</v>

01:00:27.360 --> 01:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe one.</v>

01:00:28.880 --> 01:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And also bear in mind, there are more consequences when the mother</v>

01:00:34.400 --> 01:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is older than there are when the father is older.</v>

01:00:37.840 --> 01:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There aren't zero.</v>

01:00:39.120 --> 01:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>There are risks as well when the father is older, but they</v>

01:00:42.800 --> 01:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are nowhere near as bad, and they are nowhere near as prevalent</v>

01:00:46.640 --> 01:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as when the mother is older.</v>

01:00:48.240 --> 01:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So just the the biological reality of it.</v>

01:00:51.280 --> 01:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>There are people who object, will say it's terrible, someone will surely</v>

01:00:54.560 --> 01:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>try to take that out of context and say something awful about</v>

01:00:57.600 --> 01:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>me, but that's inevitable.</v>

01:00:59.440 --> 01:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But the biological reality is that if you don't marry someone who</v>

01:01:02.240 --> 01:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is in that window, and again, it's only about sixteen years, whatever</v>

01:01:05.520 --> 01:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be plus or minus a number of years.</v>

01:01:07.840 --> 01:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't marry a woman who's in that window, your odds</v>

01:01:11.040 --> 01:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of having children drop off precipitously.</v>

01:01:14.080 --> 01:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>That is simply the reality of being a flesh and bone creature,</v>

01:01:19.200 --> 01:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a biological creature.</v>

01:01:21.040 --> 01:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Women have a fertility window.</v>

01:01:24.400 --> 01:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Men really don't.</v>

01:01:25.920 --> 01:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:27.280 --> 01:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't get mad we mean you can.</v>

01:01:29.200 --> 01:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You can get mad at biology, but you can't ignore it because</v>

01:01:31.360 --> 01:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>if you ignore it, you're not going to obtain the desired outcome.</v>

01:01:36.880 --> 01:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>A question I've fielded before, moving on to the next question.</v>

01:01:40.480 --> 01:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>A question that I've fielded before, but I'll answer it again just</v>

01:01:43.760 --> 01:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>because why not?</v>

01:01:46.560 --> 01:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I will pull up a</v>

01:01:50.400 --> 01:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>web page here so that I can actually show people.</v>

01:01:53.280 --> 01:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked about the intro and outro music for Stone Choir.</v>

01:01:57.920 --> 01:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably spell it correct.</v>

01:01:59.600 --> 01:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you go to stonequire.com slash resources, it will give you</v>

01:02:03.840 --> 01:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the intro and outro music.</v>

01:02:05.200 --> 01:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Those are available there.</v>

01:02:06.480 --> 01:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It also gives a little bit of information about it.</v>

01:02:08.880 --> 01:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the intro music is the tune.</v>

01:02:11.360 --> 01:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course the tune's all that matters because there's no singing.</v>

01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>The tune is Ebenezer, and most Lutherans will recognize it as thy</v>

01:02:18.720 --> 01:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>strong word.</v>

01:02:19.360 --> 01:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the more famous, one of the more well</v>

01:02:21.760 --> 01:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>known hymns in Lutheranism at least, that uses that tune.</v>

01:02:26.560 --> 01:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Baptists will probably hear O The deep love of Jesus, because that</v>

01:02:30.240 --> 01:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is more common in their tradition, same tune.</v>

01:02:33.600 --> 01:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the outro music is Ach Gott von Himmel, which is</v>

01:02:38.720 --> 01:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>translated into English as O Lord, look down from heaven.</v>

01:02:42.640 --> 01:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You can go ahead and look up those lyrics on hymnery is</v>

01:02:46.320 --> 01:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>usually the best website, hymnery.org.</v>

01:02:48.720 --> 01:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I will again try to remember to put those in the show</v>

01:02:51.760 --> 01:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>notes. Make a note of that quickly so I remember that.</v>

01:02:57.520 --> 01:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Till I have a secretary doing this live I have to take</v>

01:03:00.320 --> 01:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the notes myself, but you can go and look at the lyrics</v>

01:03:03.200 --> 01:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for those, and basically I just edited those in garage band, because</v>

01:03:08.080 --> 01:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>yes, I'm a Mac user, as you might already know.</v>

01:03:10.880 --> 01:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So I edited those in garage band and that's the intro and</v>

01:03:13.920 --> 01:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the outro.</v>

01:03:14.720 --> 01:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And we just sort of ran with it.</v>

01:03:21.200 --> 01:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>The next question here, I think I will try to at least</v>

01:03:24.400 --> 01:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get through a couple more questions.</v>

01:03:26.160 --> 01:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I will go ahead and answer the the super chat here because</v>

01:03:29.040 --> 01:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that just seems like the right thing</v>

01:03:31.680 --> 01:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to do before I get to some questions that I just pulled</v>

01:03:36.240 --> 01:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>off X in various other places.</v>

01:03:38.400 --> 01:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I got through all the questions I wanted to get through from</v>

01:03:42.320 --> 01:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the forum for tonight.</v>

01:03:43.920 --> 01:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I did not get through all the questions on the forum, so</v>

01:03:46.480 --> 01:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think that I missed your question.</v>

01:03:48.800 --> 01:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>There are some questions that are going to take me a little</v>

01:03:51.200 --> 01:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>more time and are going to take me a little bit of</v>

01:03:53.680 --> 01:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>prep work because I got asked about a couple things that were</v>

01:03:57.120 --> 01:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>less familiar to me, sort of things in other countries, things like</v>

01:04:00.880 --> 01:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that. And so I want to spend a little more time and</v>

01:04:02.960 --> 01:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I just had a very busy week.</v>

01:04:04.240 --> 01:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't manage to get to it.</v>

01:04:05.520 --> 01:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>As you might have guessed from the fact that I'm doing the</v>

01:04:07.440 --> 01:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Q and A at at ten o'clock at night on Friday.</v>

01:04:11.680 --> 01:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But the question from the superchat here is what is your take</v>

01:04:15.760 --> 01:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on Stephen Anderson of Faithful Word Baptist?</v>

01:04:18.880 --> 01:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Particularly his opinion that sodomites cannot possibly ever be one to Christ.</v>

01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So I have mixed feelings about him for a number of reasons.</v>

01:04:29.040 --> 01:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>One, he's really bad on race.</v>

01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Two, he of course is a Baptist, and so I disagree with</v>

01:04:34.480 --> 01:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>him vehemently with regard to the sacraments, and he is particularly obnoxious</v>

01:04:39.200 --> 01:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to his treatment of the sacraments and things like</v>

01:04:42.320 --> 01:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that. But</v>

01:04:44.480 --> 01:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to comment more specifically on the question of sodomites, and sort of</v>

01:04:49.120 --> 01:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's my general sense of the man, but I've interacted with him</v>

01:04:53.200 --> 01:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on X.</v>

01:04:54.880 --> 01:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Just a little bit, but when it comes to Sodomites, can they</v>

01:04:59.440 --> 01:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be one over?</v>

01:05:00.800 --> 01:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes.</v>

01:05:02.640 --> 01:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And the New Testament actually says that explicitly, because there's a listing</v>

01:05:07.680 --> 01:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of sins and then it says such were some of you who</v>

01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>were past tense.</v>

01:05:13.760 --> 01:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>These are men who have converted and become believers.</v>

01:05:18.400 --> 01:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Now this interacts with something that is a question actually, someone brought</v>

01:05:25.120 --> 01:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>up</v>

01:05:26.400 --> 01:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, a question to which I do not think I will</v>

01:05:30.320 --> 01:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>get tonight, but I'll get to it next time.</v>

01:05:32.240 --> 01:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of the confluence here of the punishment for certain crimes.</v>

01:05:36.960 --> 01:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>In that case particularly adultery was one of the ones mentioned, blasphemy,</v>

01:05:40.800 --> 01:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sodomy is certainly another.</v>

01:05:43.040 --> 01:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>The</v>

01:05:44.240 --> 01:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>recommended punishment, and I would say required punishment because</v>

01:05:50.400 --> 01:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how deeply I want to get into this for this</v>

01:05:53.200 --> 01:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>particular episode, but I think it's worth addressing this facet of it.</v>

01:05:58.560 --> 01:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>In the old testament, there are two kinds of abomination that are</v>

01:06:03.520 --> 01:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>listed</v>

01:06:05.200 --> 01:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>as something that is prohibited or must be punished.</v>

01:06:09.120 --> 01:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Typically both.</v>

01:06:10.640 --> 01:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But there is the abomination for you, which is addressing Old Testament</v>

01:06:16.160 --> 01:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Israel. And so for instance, a lot of seafood is an abomination</v>

01:06:22.160 --> 01:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Old Testament Israelites.</v>

01:06:25.200 --> 01:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Pig's flesh is an abomination for the Old Testament Israelites.</v>

01:06:30.160 --> 01:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It is prohibited to them by God.</v>

01:06:33.040 --> 01:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>What God does not say is that it is an abomination, period.</v>

01:06:38.240 --> 01:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>It is an abomination to you, to them specifically.</v>

01:06:43.120 --> 01:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>There are other places where it says something</v>

01:06:45.680 --> 01:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is an abomination full stop or is an abomination to God.</v>

01:06:52.320 --> 01:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Sodomy homosexuality is listed as an abomination to God and the punishment</v>

01:06:58.720 --> 01:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is a capital punishment.</v>

01:07:02.320 --> 01:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>My belief, my firm belief, and I don't see how anyone can</v>

01:07:05.520 --> 01:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>get around this despite the fact that many modern exegetes so called</v>

01:07:09.360 --> 01:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have tried, is that when God says something is an abomination to</v>

01:07:13.920 --> 01:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>him and says that it must be punished with capital punishment, I</v>

01:07:17.760 --> 01:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think we get any say.</v>

01:07:19.760 --> 01:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think at the absolute most, perhaps we could suspend the capital</v>

01:07:23.280 --> 01:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>punishment for a period of time if you wanted to use the</v>

01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>person for hard labor or something.</v>

01:07:27.440 --> 01:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably permissible.</v>

01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you get to avoid the reality of what</v>

01:07:33.920 --> 01:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it says in the Old Testament.</v>

01:07:35.440 --> 01:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is, can the person repent?</v>

01:07:38.640 --> 01:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes, but that doesn't mean the state shouldn't punish</v>

01:07:43.120 --> 01:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>him for what he has done.</v>

01:07:45.040 --> 01:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true with regard to murderers.</v>

01:07:47.520 --> 01:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>A murderer can certainly repent of his sins of his crimes before</v>

01:07:52.560 --> 01:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he is executed.</v>

01:07:54.320 --> 01:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But the state must still execute him.</v>

01:07:56.880 --> 01:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Just because you have been forgiven your sins does not mean the</v>

01:08:00.720 --> 01:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>temporal consequences of that of those sins are washed away.</v>

01:08:04.880 --> 01:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The temporal consequences remain particularly for those sorts of crimes.</v>

01:08:09.840 --> 01:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So yes a sodomite can certainly repent, yes the state should still</v>

01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely punish them, and the Old Testament is the guide for that.</v>

01:08:23.920 --> 01:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So, yes, I I don't think that his conclusion that sodomites never</v>

01:08:27.200 --> 01:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>repent is true.</v>

01:08:29.040 --> 01:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say they rarely repent.</v>

01:08:31.200 --> 01:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think history bears that one out, and I think we all</v>

01:08:34.160 --> 01:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>know that from looking at our culture today.</v>

01:08:36.240 --> 01:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you're asking about the possibility of it, yes they can.</v>

01:08:39.440 --> 01:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Will they?</v>

01:08:40.480 --> 01:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Much less likely.</v>

01:08:46.240 --> 01:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>The next question and this may be the last one I will</v>

01:08:51.200 --> 01:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>do, maybe.</v>

01:08:56.400 --> 01:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this will be second to last.</v>

01:08:58.560 --> 01:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>This will be the penultimate one that I do tonight.</v>

01:09:01.360 --> 01:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But a question about do I support absolute monarchy basically is the</v>

01:09:07.120 --> 01:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the short form of the question here.</v>

01:09:09.040 --> 01:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And the answer to that is yes.</v>

01:09:10.880 --> 01:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm actually going to pull something up here because</v>

01:09:16.480 --> 01:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Lutherans, I don't want the Athanasian Creed.</v>

01:09:20.640 --> 01:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Lutherans are technically bound to believe that the monarch is absolute.</v>

01:09:26.640 --> 01:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Because it's actually in our confessions, one of those things that people</v>

01:09:29.760 --> 01:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to ignore and I don't know why.</v>

01:09:32.480 --> 01:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>OBS decided to zoom there, but it will hardly matter.</v>

01:09:36.080 --> 01:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully I I know where this is.</v>

01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in the article on the bishops, the ecclesiastical power here.</v>

01:09:42.720 --> 01:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So in this article, and we'll see if I can get</v>

01:09:49.680 --> 01:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>OBS to agree to show the fullness of the page instead of</v>

01:09:54.640 --> 01:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that. Maybe I'll just pull up the browser's the full thing.</v>

01:09:56.880 --> 01:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't need my face for this.</v>

01:09:59.040 --> 01:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:10:00.800 --> 01:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the bishops, because this of course is an article on</v>

01:10:04.480 --> 01:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>church authority, but in passing it mentions something about the power of</v>

01:10:10.560 --> 01:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>kings and tyrants.</v>

01:10:12.400 --> 01:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>But their power, speaking of the bishops, is not tyrannical, that is,</v>

01:10:16.640 --> 01:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>without a fixed law, nor regal, which is to say, of a</v>

01:10:20.560 --> 01:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>monarch, above the law.</v>

01:10:24.160 --> 01:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, monarchs are above the law.</v>

01:10:27.920 --> 01:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That's just stated as a simple fact in the confession.</v>

01:10:30.800 --> 01:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I know there are going to be those who will try to</v>

01:10:32.240 --> 01:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>say, oh well it's not a theological point.</v>

01:10:34.480 --> 01:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I strongly disagree.</v>

01:10:35.840 --> 01:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a core theological point.</v>

01:10:38.160 --> 01:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I would say that Lutherans are actually bound to believe</v>

01:10:41.200 --> 01:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that the monarch is above the law, because it very clearly says</v>

01:10:45.280 --> 01:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the apology that the regal power.</v>

01:10:50.560 --> 01:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Someone said muted.</v>

01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Am I muted?</v>

01:10:53.680 --> 01:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I did that.</v>

01:11:03.600 --> 01:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Am I muted?</v>

01:11:05.200 --> 01:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Is</v>

01:11:07.040 --> 01:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>someone in the chat say if you can hear me because nothing</v>

01:11:09.840 --> 01:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>shows is muted on my end during full screen.</v>

01:11:13.920 --> 01:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's okay, cool.</v>

01:11:16.320 --> 01:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So apparently OBS just decided to be very cooperative there when I</v>

01:11:20.800 --> 01:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was full screen.</v>

01:11:21.680 --> 01:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I will just re-say what I said.</v>

01:11:25.600 --> 01:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>In the Book of Concord, in the Apology, it says that of</v>

01:11:29.520 --> 01:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the of the bishops, but their power is not to be tyrannical,</v>

01:11:32.800 --> 01:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that is, without a fixed rule, nor regal above the law.</v>

01:11:38.320 --> 01:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And so what that says is that the monarch is above the</v>

01:11:41.920 --> 01:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>law. I would say Lutherans are confessionally bound to believe the monarch</v>

01:11:45.920 --> 01:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is above the law, and I think that that also flows logically,</v>

01:11:49.600 --> 01:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>both theologically and politically, because</v>

01:11:54.800 --> 01:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the question ultimately is what is the source of the power of</v>

01:11:58.160 --> 01:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the law?</v>

01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Well we've tried in modern democracies and republics to say it's this</v>

01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>document, it's the Constitution, right?</v>

01:12:10.160 --> 01:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution doesn't have any power.</v>

01:12:13.600 --> 01:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>The piece of paper doesn't have any power.</v>

01:12:15.600 --> 01:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The Magna Carta doesn't have any power.</v>

01:12:19.760 --> 01:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What backs those ultimately, of course, is the military, but then you're</v>

01:12:24.560 --> 01:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just down to raw naked use of force, which yes, of course,</v>

01:12:28.480 --> 01:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>might makes right to a certain degree.</v>

01:12:31.520 --> 01:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it is entirely proper to ground the law,</v>

01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the force behind the law, in the person of the monarch, or</v>

01:12:41.600 --> 01:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at least in the monarchy as an institution.</v>

01:12:44.560 --> 01:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And so necessarily, the institution from which the authority of the law</v>

01:12:49.760 --> 01:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>flows is itself above the law, not bound to it.</v>

01:12:53.760 --> 01:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That just follows naturally and logically.</v>

01:12:56.160 --> 01:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I agree, I affirm what the Book of Concord says</v>

01:12:59.920 --> 01:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that the monarch, the regal power, is above the law, and so</v>

01:13:04.480 --> 01:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I do support an absolute monarchy in that sense.</v>

01:13:08.240 --> 01:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But the law that the monarchy has, because of course, the comment</v>

01:13:12.240 --> 01:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>about tyrannical is also, I think, fairly applied to the monarch in</v>

01:13:16.960 --> 01:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the negative, which is to say the monarch cannot be a tyrant,</v>

01:13:20.720 --> 01:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>because he is not without law.</v>

01:13:23.280 --> 01:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>He is under the moral law, because he is bound by God's</v>

01:13:27.040 --> 01:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>law. One of the duties of the Christian prince is to transpose</v>

01:13:32.080 --> 01:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the moral law into the positive law.</v>

01:13:34.160 --> 01:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And for those who don't know, the moral law is the god</v>

01:13:36.880 --> 01:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is the law that flows from God's nature.</v>

01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So for instance, Genesis nine six He who sheds the blood of</v>

01:13:43.520 --> 01:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>man by man shall his blood be shed, for God was made</v>

01:13:46.720 --> 01:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the image for man was made in the image of God,</v>

01:13:49.440 --> 01:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>right?</v>

01:13:51.600 --> 01:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That is moral law that is unchanging that flows from God's nature.</v>

01:13:57.120 --> 01:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The positive law is the written law that men use in our</v>

01:14:01.520 --> 01:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>governments, our courts, our day to day life.</v>

01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And so for instance, you have thou shalt not kill in the</v>

01:14:08.640 --> 01:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>moral law, or thou shalt not murder to use the modern term.</v>

01:14:12.880 --> 01:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Kill is the old English term that means what murder means today,</v>

01:14:16.320 --> 01:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>basically. In the positive law, we have laws defining types of murder,</v>

01:14:22.480 --> 01:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and then charging that person and then punishing that person with various</v>

01:14:26.320 --> 01:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>punishments depending on the kind of murder he committed.</v>

01:14:29.840 --> 01:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>That is a transposition of the moral law into the positive law.</v>

01:14:33.840 --> 01:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the duties of the king, because the king</v>

01:14:37.120 --> 01:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is in fact bound by the moral law, and king and Christian</v>

01:14:41.200 --> 01:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>prince are interchangeable in this case.</v>

01:14:43.760 --> 01:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Christian prince is the generic term.</v>

01:14:45.600 --> 01:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that he's a prince, it just means that he</v>

01:14:47.600 --> 01:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Christian ruler of a particular area.</v>

01:14:50.560 --> 01:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Of a particular nation, particular land.</v>

01:14:53.600 --> 01:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of his duties.</v>

01:14:55.920 --> 01:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He's not above all law, he's above the positive law, because he</v>

01:15:00.320 --> 01:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is the one that is the source of the authority for that</v>

01:15:03.280 --> 01:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>positive law in his lands, being the one who has the duty</v>

01:15:06.720 --> 01:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to transpose the moral law into the positive law.</v>

01:15:10.320 --> 01:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I do believe in that sense in an absolute monarch.</v>

01:15:15.280 --> 01:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe the monarch can say adultery is now legal.</v>

01:15:18.960 --> 01:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think he can say murder is legal, Because that would be</v>

01:15:22.400 --> 01:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to put his throne above God's throne.</v>

01:15:25.200 --> 01:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That's to be antichrist, and that man does not deserve to remain</v>

01:15:29.920 --> 01:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>king. And so I think I will end with perhaps a more</v>

01:15:36.160 --> 01:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lighthearted, easier to answer question here.</v>

01:15:40.160 --> 01:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked if I have any knowledge about sort of the number</v>

01:15:46.160 --> 01:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and existence of female listeners to Stone Choir?</v>

01:15:49.840 --> 01:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And I guess this as well, because it was a more generic</v>

01:15:53.040 --> 01:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>question. The answer is yes.</v>

01:15:55.360 --> 01:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a fair number, a fair percentage of female listeners to</v>

01:15:59.120 --> 01:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Stone Choir and I haven't looked at the statistics specifically for this</v>

01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't keep any creepy statistics.</v>

01:16:06.960 --> 01:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube does.</v>

01:16:08.080 --> 01:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So I can look at YouTube and see the rough breakdown of</v>

01:16:11.200 --> 01:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>male and female and unfortunately, at lists other as well, but</v>

01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there are female listeners to this, and there are certainly female listeners</v>

01:16:19.760 --> 01:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to Stone Choir.</v>

01:16:21.280 --> 01:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The overwhelming majority of listeners to Stone Choir are male, at least</v>

01:16:26.560 --> 01:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>according to YouTube.</v>

01:16:28.480 --> 01:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Now</v>

01:16:30.400 --> 01:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not perfectly accurate because the YouTube audience for particularly this kind</v>

01:16:37.440 --> 01:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of content anyway, skews mail.</v>

01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And it skews younger in male.</v>

01:16:42.880 --> 01:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of z like zoomer to m Gen X, right?</v>

01:16:46.640 --> 01:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll pretend Gen X exists for the case of this.</v>

01:16:49.120 --> 01:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of the YouTube audience, the bulk of the audience for</v>

01:16:52.400 --> 01:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>at least this type of content.</v>

01:16:55.040 --> 01:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that's going to skew the percentage.</v>

01:16:58.240 --> 01:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also the fact that YouTube is the only platform</v>

01:17:01.760 --> 01:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>from which I have any real analytics.</v>

01:17:04.240 --> 01:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>There's some for Spotify.</v>

01:17:06.560 --> 01:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, and like I've said many times before, I</v>

01:17:09.920 --> 01:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>don't use creepy analytics, and we never used it for Stone Choir.</v>

01:17:14.240 --> 01:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Literally all that I have for Stone Choir, insofar as analytics are</v>

01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned, is in order to make the system robust to support changes</v>

01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to the URL structure so that downloads would continue to work, I</v>

01:17:28.240 --> 01:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can tell roughly how many times an episode was downloaded directly.</v>

01:17:34.320 --> 01:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>For anyone who understands this technology in this area, you know how</v>

01:17:39.600 --> 01:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>little that means.</v>

01:17:41.200 --> 01:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Because it means that anything that was cached on a third party</v>

01:17:44.080 --> 01:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>server, Spotify, YouTube, I don't think Apple caches, I think Apple does</v>

01:17:48.800 --> 01:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>direct downloads.</v>

01:17:50.480 --> 01:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea.</v>

01:17:51.920 --> 01:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So all I know is this rough number of people who download,</v>

01:17:54.960 --> 01:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I can look at YouTube and figure out like kinda</v>

01:17:58.160 --> 01:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>roughly male versus female.</v>

01:18:00.640 --> 01:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have good numbers, but I can certainly say that</v>

01:18:04.880 --> 01:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we do have female listeners.</v>

01:18:06.720 --> 01:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I've I've met some of them.</v>

01:18:08.400 --> 01:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I know some of them.</v>

01:18:09.200 --> 01:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to them.</v>

01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So I I know that we do actually have female listeners.</v>

01:18:12.640 --> 01:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>There are women who are interested in this material in these things.</v>

01:18:16.240 --> 01:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And so perhaps that's some</v>

01:18:19.360 --> 01:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>good news for the men who are looking for wives.</v>

01:18:21.600 --> 01:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>There are women out there who actually do have an interest in</v>

01:18:23.920 --> 01:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>these things.</v>

01:18:25.680 --> 01:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Again, that's not something you have to require in a wife, right?</v>

01:18:28.640 --> 01:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You can introduce her to these things, but you know, it's one</v>

01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>hurdle not to have to overcome.</v>

01:18:32.960 --> 01:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>They exist.</v>

01:18:33.680 --> 01:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Those women exist.</v>

01:18:34.640 --> 01:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not all married.</v>

01:18:35.600 --> 01:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are single.</v>

01:18:36.960 --> 01:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Go find them.</v>

01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the things you need to do as a man.</v>

01:18:40.880 --> 01:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that pretty much sums it up for this episode.</v>

01:18:45.280 --> 01:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where I'll close it out for tonight.</v>

01:18:47.600 --> 01:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take up all of your Friday evening.</v>

01:18:51.040 --> 01:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Although I suppose most people who are going to watch this will</v>

01:18:54.560 --> 01:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>probably watch it after instead of live since I did it on</v>

01:18:57.280 --> 01:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a Friday.</v>

01:18:57.680 --> 01:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's part of why I tried to do it on Thursday, but</v>

01:18:59.680 --> 01:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I had a very busy week.</v>

01:19:01.200 --> 01:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I did not manage to get around to it yesterday.</v>

01:19:04.160 --> 01:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But thank you for those who submitted questions and I will try</v>

01:19:07.920 --> 01:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to note down all of the questions in the chat that I</v>

01:19:11.760 --> 01:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>did not answer and the ones that were in responses to the</v>

01:19:16.080 --> 01:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ex post and things like that and get to them next time,</v>

01:19:19.440 --> 01:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hopefully. There are also the pending questions from the forum.</v>

01:19:23.600 --> 01:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that those are still outstanding, in particular's one about South</v>

01:19:26.880 --> 01:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Africa and a few other things.</v>

01:19:28.160 --> 01:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you ask those questions, I have noticed them.</v>

01:19:31.040 --> 01:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I know they're there.</v>

01:19:31.920 --> 01:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I will get to those when I have the time.</v>

01:19:34.800 --> 01:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And again, thank you for submitting the questions and thank you for</v>

01:19:37.920 --> 01:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>your time.</v>

01:19:38.800 --> 01:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And I hope that you all have a wonderful evening</v>

01:19:42.320 --> 01:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and a great rest of your weekend.</v>

01:19:44.240 --> 01:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course, go to church on Sunday.</v>

01:19:46.720 --> 01:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And God bless you all.</v>

01:19:48.640 --> 01:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.</v>