WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:00.640
Yeah.

00:00:37.040 --> 00:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast.</v>

00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I am Cory J.</v>

00:00:40.720 --> 00:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Mahler and I'm still woe.</v>

00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.</v>

00:00:48.480 --> 00:00:52.160
<v Speaker 2>The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the</v>

00:00:52.160 --> 00:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>face of the deep, and the spirit of God was hovering over</v>

00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the face of the waters.</v>

00:00:56.800 --> 00:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>And God said, Let there be light, and there was light, and</v>

00:01:00.880 --> 00:01:04.480
<v Speaker 2>God saw that the light was good, and God separated the light</v>

00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>from the darkness.</v>

00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>God called the light day, and the darkness he called night, and</v>

00:01:09.600 --> 00:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>there was evening and there was morning the first day.</v>

00:01:13.520 --> 00:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>And God said, Let there be an expanse in the midst of</v>

00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters, and</v>

00:01:20.560 --> 00:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the</v>

00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>expanse, from the waters that were above the expanse, and it was</v>

00:01:27.440 --> 00:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>so, and God called the expanse heaven, and there was evening and</v>

00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>there was morning, the second day.</v>

00:01:34.080 --> 00:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>And God said, Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together</v>

00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>into one place, and let the dry land appear, and it was</v>

00:01:41.600 --> 00:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>so. God called the dry land earth, and the waters that were</v>

00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>gathered together he called seas, and God saw that it was good.</v>

00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode of Stone Choir as you might have guessed is going</v>

00:01:53.520 --> 00:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to be about the six days of creation, as it intersects with</v>

00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>theology today and as it intersects with modern scientific understanding.</v>

00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:06.480
<v Speaker 3>This is a subject that we broached in episode six on the</v>

00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:11.120
<v Speaker 3>perspicuity of scripture, where we discussed in in some different detail than</v>

00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>we're going to go in today the fact that there are modern</v>

00:02:16.240 --> 00:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>debates among Christians about to what degree do we believe the Bible.</v>

00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Do we believe that it is allegorical in some areas?</v>

00:02:25.760 --> 00:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Are this is this some sort of fictional genre of literature that</v>

00:02:30.720 --> 00:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>isn't to be believed literally?</v>

00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>What do you do when God is saying things that don't line</v>

00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>up with our understanding of physics?</v>

00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for example, when you read through Genesis one and two, light</v>

00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>appears before stars appear.</v>

00:02:44.560 --> 00:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Obviously as as intelligent men, we know that's stupid because we know</v>

00:02:48.240 --> 00:02:49.840
<v Speaker 3>that light comes from stars.</v>

00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>God says the opposite.</v>

00:02:51.600 --> 00:02:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And so as Christians, we have one approach to these things and</v>

00:02:55.760 --> 00:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>then the world has another approach to these things.</v>

00:02:58.640 --> 00:03:01.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the reasons we want to tackle this subject today is</v>

00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that the question of how does scientific knowledge match up with or</v>

00:03:06.320 --> 00:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>conflict with what's in scripture is a stumbling block for some people</v>

00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>who are coming to the faith.</v>

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I know that lately we've picked up quite a few new listeners,</v>

00:03:14.320 --> 00:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>uh, particularly from the myth of twentieth century appearance.</v>

00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Uh thank you again to Adam for that.</v>

00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:20.800
<v Speaker 3>That was a a treat to be on there.</v>

00:03:20.800 --> 00:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>And I one of the things that I mentioned, and it surprised</v>

00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>him a little bit, was that I am a young earth creationist.</v>

00:03:26.560 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>The reason that I am, and the reason we're discussing this today,</v>

00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>is that it is the only possible Christian position.</v>

00:03:33.200 --> 00:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>So today's episode is going to be in two parts.</v>

00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>The first part's going to be the short part talking about the</v>

00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>theology, and then we're going to spend the rest of the time</v>

00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>talking about some of the science.</v>

00:03:41.920 --> 00:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Because I know that a lot of you, if you're looking at</v>

00:03:44.080 --> 00:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Christianity, that you maybe you want to believe it, you're trying to</v>

00:03:46.880 --> 00:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>figure out what this stuff is about, the things that you know,</v>

00:03:49.920 --> 00:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the things that are scientific knowledge that you think you can have</v>

00:03:52.800 --> 00:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>confidence in, if they're at odds with this Jesus stuff, you got</v>

00:03:57.760 --> 00:03:59.120
<v Speaker 3>to keep your bearings.</v>

00:03:59.120 --> 00:04:02.960
<v Speaker 3>And then and as Christians for the majority of the audience, those</v>

00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>who are fully engaged in the faith, what do we do with</v>

00:04:06.320 --> 00:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>a world that's saying, no, that's nonsense.</v>

00:04:09.440 --> 00:04:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Here's what we actually believe.</v>

00:04:11.200 --> 00:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>And today there are a lot of people in the church who</v>

00:04:13.120 --> 00:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>want to kind of split the difference and say, well, you know,</v>

00:04:15.440 --> 00:04:18.160
<v Speaker 3>it's just kind of it was it was flowery language.</v>

00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what God really meant?</v>

00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:24.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the tricks that's played within the church is that you'll</v>

00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>find guys today saying, Well, if you look at the early church</v>

00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:31.040
<v Speaker 3>fathers, they debated whether the six days of creation was literal or</v>

00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>not. It is true to an extent.</v>

00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:37.440
<v Speaker 3>There were some church fathers who disputed whether it was six natural</v>

00:04:37.440 --> 00:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hour days.</v>

00:04:39.840 --> 00:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>However, they were not doing that in defense of a universe that</v>

00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:45.840
<v Speaker 3>was millions or billions of years old.</v>

00:04:45.840 --> 00:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Their argument was whether it was 168 hours or whether it was</v>

00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:50.800
<v Speaker 3>less than that.</v>

00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Because the other side of that argument was specifically saying creation was</v>

00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:57.520
<v Speaker 3>instantaneous, effectively the big bang.</v>

00:04:57.520 --> 00:05:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And then after that, God, you know, put everything together.</v>

00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>And so they were debating within a very small amount of time,</v>

00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>was it you know a femtosecond or was it 168 hours?</v>

00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>That's not remotely the debate today.</v>

00:05:11.760 --> 00:05:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So if you hear someone claiming to be a Christian who says,</v>

00:05:14.960 --> 00:05:18.720
<v Speaker 3>oh, that's an open question because the early church fathers debated, know</v>

00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that they're lying to you, flat out lying.</v>

00:05:20.960 --> 00:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>None of the church fathers say what they were saying when they</v>

00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>want to say who could not possibly know.</v>

00:05:25.600 --> 00:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it might have been a thousand years, ten thousand years, a</v>

00:05:28.240 --> 00:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>million years.</v>

00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>They weren't saying that.</v>

00:05:30.400 --> 00:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>And if they had, they would have been wrong, because they were</v>

00:05:32.640 --> 00:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>flawed, sinful men, just like you and me and everyone who's ever</v>

00:05:37.040 --> 00:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>looked at these things.</v>

00:05:38.480 --> 00:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>We have scripture.</v>

00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>We have scripture to be confident in.</v>

00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:45.280
<v Speaker 3>And that was episode six on the clarity of scripture, discussing the</v>

00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:49.280
<v Speaker 3>fact that as Christians, that is our frame of reference.</v>

00:05:49.280 --> 00:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>When God spoke the universe into existence, as Corey just read, that's</v>

00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it. It appeared because he said it.</v>

00:05:57.680 --> 00:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>He declared it and it became.</v>

00:06:00.480 --> 00:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>That's That is power.</v>

00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:06.080
<v Speaker 3>That is the infinite power of the creator.</v>

00:06:06.080 --> 00:06:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Creation began at that point.</v>

00:06:07.920 --> 00:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>And so the six days of creation are when God was putting</v>

00:06:12.560 --> 00:06:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the universe together, when he was establishing the order that we see</v>

00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>observable today.</v>

00:06:18.400 --> 00:06:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we see rules, we see constants, we see patterns emerge over</v>

00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>and over, and they tend to be very consistent.</v>

00:06:24.720 --> 00:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>We don't see a lot of variation over time.</v>

00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Or if we do see variation, it's predictable based on rules inherent</v>

00:06:31.600 --> 00:06:33.040
<v Speaker 3>to the system.</v>

00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>And that is something that people want to sort of soft pedal</v>

00:06:37.200 --> 00:06:39.440
<v Speaker 3>and say, well, I'm not going to talk about the Bible, but</v>

00:06:39.440 --> 00:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>there's got to be an intelligent designer, don't you think?</v>

00:06:42.080 --> 00:06:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that's true, but why why be godless?</v>

00:06:45.280 --> 00:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>It's God.</v>

00:06:46.640 --> 00:06:49.760
<v Speaker 3>And so the second half of this episode, you know, the majority</v>

00:06:49.760 --> 00:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>of the episode we're talking about the science stuff, we're going to</v>

00:06:52.320 --> 00:06:55.680
<v Speaker 3>be making the case that if you If you reject scripture, or</v>

00:06:55.680 --> 00:06:59.120
<v Speaker 3>if you don't believe scripture yet, you say, well, that's faith-based.</v>

00:06:59.120 --> 00:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm fact-based.</v>

00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>We will demonstrate.</v>

00:07:01.680 --> 00:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Mostly Corney's going to be demonstrating by because he's he's actually well</v>

00:07:05.360 --> 00:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>versed in science.</v>

00:07:06.320 --> 00:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be your voice in this episode, just kind of</v>

00:07:08.880 --> 00:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>being the the dummy listening and asking questions because I'll tell you,</v>

00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>my science education was utter garbage.</v>

00:07:14.880 --> 00:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I the Lutheran high school I went to in Indianapolis had the</v>

00:07:17.920 --> 00:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>same science teacher in tenth and eleventh grade.</v>

00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I very distinctly remember the first day of eleventh grade.</v>

00:07:24.400 --> 00:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>She said, Hey guys, remember last year when I told you what</v>

00:07:28.320 --> 00:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>exothermic and endothermic reactions were about?</v>

00:07:31.040 --> 00:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I got those backwards.</v>

00:07:32.240 --> 00:07:35.280
<v Speaker 3>So So I knew she was wrong at the time, but like</v>

00:07:35.840 --> 00:07:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Lutheran schools are variable in quality.</v>

00:07:38.880 --> 00:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>So I love science.</v>

00:07:40.800 --> 00:07:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm that guy, except I'm also Christian.</v>

00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>But whenever I look at these things, it's always in view of</v>

00:07:46.320 --> 00:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>here's what I already believe based on scripture, what is it that</v>

00:07:50.080 --> 00:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>we're discovering in creation?</v>

00:07:52.640 --> 00:07:56.880
<v Speaker 3>If you've gone back through the catalog of Stone Choir episodes, you</v>

00:07:56.880 --> 00:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>will find that Corey and I will very often point back to</v>

00:08:01.200 --> 00:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Job chapters 38 and following, where God finally appears to Job to</v>

00:08:07.280 --> 00:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>answer him, to answer his complaints and his demands for explanation.</v>

00:08:11.200 --> 00:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>And And what you find, please go read it.</v>

00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>It's beautiful.</v>

00:08:13.600 --> 00:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>It's the as I've said is one of my favorite passages.</v>

00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>When God appears to Job and talks to him, he doesn't coddle</v>

00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>him. He doesn't say, oh, sorry, you're going through this, or he</v>

00:08:24.400 --> 00:08:27.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't, he doesn't try to make things better right away.</v>

00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>His immediate response when Job is demanding explanations from the Creator is</v>

00:08:32.720 --> 00:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>who are you?</v>

00:08:33.920 --> 00:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Where were you when I formed the world.</v>

00:08:38.000 --> 00:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>And he goes into great length for multiple chapters describing his creation</v>

00:08:43.200 --> 00:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>as testifying to his glory.</v>

00:08:45.280 --> 00:08:48.880
<v Speaker 3>So when I say I love science, it's not the the reddit</v>

00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>atheist soyjack face.</v>

00:08:50.880 --> 00:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I love the fact that when I look at creation, every time</v>

00:08:53.760 --> 00:08:57.600
<v Speaker 3>there's something that we finally figure out a little bit more, it's</v>

00:08:57.520 --> 00:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a greater revelation of God's natural revelation.</v>

00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I see God in those things because I believe God when He</v>

00:09:04.000 --> 00:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>said He made them.</v>

00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:08.080
<v Speaker 3>And so as we get into some of the details, what we</v>

00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:13.440
<v Speaker 3>will establish is that it is also faith-based to believe the science,</v>

00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>so-called, against Scripture.</v>

00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's in fact a much more absurd belief system.</v>

00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:19.840
It

00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>might be helpful to point out before we get into more of</v>

00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the scripture, the word that is underlying day there in Genesis, and</v>

00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the word is Hemera.</v>

00:09:32.960 --> 00:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>That word just means day in Greek.</v>

00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:38.320
<v Speaker 2>From B Dag.</v>

00:09:38.320 --> 00:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>The first definition is the period between sunrise and sunset.</v>

00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Exactly what we would call a day in English.</v>

00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The second definition is the civil or legal day, which includes the</v>

00:09:51.440 --> 00:09:55.680
<v Speaker 2>night. Again, one of the main definitions we would use in English.</v>

00:09:56.080 --> 00:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a term that means day.</v>

00:09:58.880 --> 00:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>It means 24-hour day.</v>

00:10:00.400 --> 00:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It means exactly what it says.</v>

00:10:02.800 --> 00:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>This is not a figurative day.</v>

00:10:04.400 --> 00:10:06.320
<v Speaker 2>This is not a metaphorical day.</v>

00:10:06.320 --> 00:10:10.560
<v Speaker 2>This is not an age, this is not an era.</v>

00:10:10.560 --> 00:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>That is an argument that has been raised many times, because just</v>

00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>like English, most other languages have a figurative use of the term</v>

00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>day. You know, every dog has his day.</v>

00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't necessarily mean a literal day.</v>

00:10:26.080 --> 00:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Could mean a period of time.</v>

00:10:27.760 --> 00:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>The same thing can be true in Greek or indeed in Hebrew.</v>

00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>But the core sense of the term, and if you read in</v>

00:10:37.040 --> 00:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the context, it is very clear the core sense is meant.</v>

00:10:39.920 --> 00:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>The core sense of the term is the 24-hour literal day.</v>

00:10:44.800 --> 00:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>So creation</v>

00:10:46.880 --> 00:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>24-hour twenty four our literal day six days, and then resting on</v>

00:10:52.720 --> 00:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the seventh day.</v>

00:10:54.400 --> 00:10:57.600
<v Speaker 2>That is why when you look at the Church Fathers, many of</v>

00:10:57.600 --> 00:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>them will have written something titled the Hexameron, which is just on</v>

00:11:01.040 --> 00:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the six days</v>

00:11:03.520 --> 00:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>because creation was a literal week.</v>

00:11:08.160 --> 00:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>The modern attempt to</v>

00:11:10.960 --> 00:11:14.720
<v Speaker 2>hand wave away on the basis of, well, there could be this</v>

00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:21.040
<v Speaker 2>figurative use of this particular term is simply embarrassment at what scripture</v>

00:11:21.040 --> 00:11:23.680
<v Speaker 2>says in light of what science supposedly claims.</v>

00:11:23.680 --> 00:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And it is generally embarrassment by men who do not understand either</v>

00:11:28.480 --> 00:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>scripture or the science.</v>

00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And we will get into those in that order in this episode.</v>

00:11:37.680 --> 00:11:41.680
<v Speaker 3>And God actually goes out of his way rhetorically in the first</v>

00:11:41.680 --> 00:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>five days of creation to say each time, and there was evening</v>

00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:47.840
<v Speaker 3>and there was morning the first day, and the second, and the</v>

00:11:47.840 --> 00:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>third, and the fourth, and the fifth.</v>

00:11:49.760 --> 00:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>God over and over again says this is a 24 hour day.</v>

00:11:54.080 --> 00:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So I thank you pr for bringing that up.</v>

00:11:55.920 --> 00:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>That is a it's a crucial point because as a Christian, if</v>

00:11:59.760 --> 00:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>you actually believe scripture, it's necessary to believe that.</v>

00:12:04.080 --> 00:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>And And</v>

00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it's a small detail, but it's consistent with the rest.</v>

00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>And as I said at the beginning, one of the one of</v>

00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the things to understand when we're looking at the six days of</v>

00:12:16.160 --> 00:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>creation before God finished, as he declared it to be finished and</v>

00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>said is very good, is that everything was up for grabs.</v>

00:12:24.160 --> 00:12:27.520
<v Speaker 3>As I said, you have light before you have stars, like the</v>

00:12:27.520 --> 00:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>order of operations doesn't make sense based on the way things exist</v>

00:12:31.520 --> 00:12:35.840
<v Speaker 3>today. And so if you're looking at a system evolving and building</v>

00:12:35.840 --> 00:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>on itself internally, yeah, it doesn't make sense.</v>

00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But we don't need a system to make sense internally because God</v>

00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>wasn't done making it.</v>

00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>It was on the last day when he said it was very</v>

00:12:46.240 --> 00:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>good and then he rested that it was complete.</v>

00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>At that point it was locked in.</v>

00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Before that, he was messing with things.</v>

00:12:53.680 --> 00:12:57.520
<v Speaker 3>He was changing things, he was moving parts around.</v>

00:12:57.520 --> 00:13:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's okay for the beginning not to add up.</v>

00:13:00.880 --> 00:13:04.720
<v Speaker 3>That's not illogical because God is doing stuff.</v>

00:13:04.720 --> 00:13:05.680
<v Speaker 3>He's working.</v>

00:13:05.680 --> 00:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, imagine you you come to someone who's building a watch</v>

00:13:09.600 --> 00:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>or a garden, you know, whatever he's doing, some creative, you know,</v>

00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>as we call creative process, and he's in the middle of it,</v>

00:13:16.640 --> 00:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>and you come in and say, Well, you're missing this and this</v>

00:13:18.640 --> 00:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>and this, and it doesn't make any sense.</v>

00:13:20.160 --> 00:13:20.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not gonna work.</v>

00:13:20.800 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>And you say, Well I'm not done yet.</v>

00:13:22.560 --> 00:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Come back on the seventh day and I'll be done with the</v>

00:13:25.840 --> 00:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>thing. The creative process involves a period of time where it's unfinished</v>

00:13:30.640 --> 00:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and then at the end it's finished.</v>

00:13:32.560 --> 00:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Personally, as a perfectionist, it's something that keeps me from doing a</v>

00:13:35.520 --> 00:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of things because I start and I am simultaneously my own</v>

00:13:39.760 --> 00:13:42.320
<v Speaker 3>critic and like that's crap, that's not good enough and so I</v>

00:13:42.320 --> 00:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>never get very far into anything because I destroy it before there</v>

00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:47.440
<v Speaker 3>can be enough there for me to build on it.</v>

00:13:47.760 --> 00:13:49.840
<v Speaker 3>God doesn't have that problem.</v>

00:13:49.840 --> 00:13:54.080
<v Speaker 3>When He built the thing, it was all internally consistent.</v>

00:13:54.080 --> 00:13:56.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's a small point, but it's it's a crucial point for</v>

00:13:56.560 --> 00:14:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Christians. It's not necessarily going to convince you if you think that</v>

00:14:00.560 --> 00:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>it's permissible to believe in</v>

00:14:02.800 --> 00:14:05.680
<v Speaker 3>old earth or something else.</v>

00:14:05.680 --> 00:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>The things that we say next in these parts about theology are</v>

00:14:09.280 --> 00:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>going to go directly at you.</v>

00:14:11.280 --> 00:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be dire very direct that if you believe in</v>

00:14:14.400 --> 00:14:19.600
<v Speaker 3>old earth, you are sinning, you're believing something contrary to scripture.</v>

00:14:19.840 --> 00:14:23.440
<v Speaker 3>the six-day thing, like it's it's true and it's correct, but you're</v>

00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>not going to believe it until you believe this next part.</v>

00:14:25.520 --> 00:14:30.080
<v Speaker 3>So the crucial argument, the old The only argument, the only argument</v>

00:14:30.080 --> 00:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that's necessary for any Christian to understand is that every theory,</v>

00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>every system of the universe, every system of life that is older</v>

00:14:42.160 --> 00:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>than six thousand years, that's you know millions of years or billions</v>

00:14:45.840 --> 00:14:52.400
<v Speaker 3>of years, any of those necessarily have death before death came into</v>

00:14:52.400 --> 00:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the world.</v>

00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.480
<v Speaker 3>So we're gonna go first over the passages that make very clear</v>

00:14:56.880 --> 00:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that there was no death before Adam sinned, and therefore nothing could</v>

00:15:01.040 --> 00:15:02.400
<v Speaker 3>die before Adam sinned.</v>

00:15:02.400 --> 00:15:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Nothing. Not only people, but nothing in the universe could have died.</v>

00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:08.560
<v Speaker 3>That was also a change.</v>

00:15:08.560 --> 00:15:10.160
<v Speaker 3>That was a change to the universe.</v>

00:15:10.160 --> 00:15:14.080
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't only a change to a man or to humanity.</v>

00:15:14.080 --> 00:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>All of creation fell with Adam.</v>

00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Because Adam was the head of the world.</v>

00:15:21.040 --> 00:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>God had put him in place.</v>

00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:26.240
<v Speaker 3>God created the animals and then brought them to Adam, and he</v>

00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>named each of them, including Eve.</v>

00:15:28.640 --> 00:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>That was an exercise of authority over all of creation.</v>

00:15:32.080 --> 00:15:34.320
<v Speaker 3>God put Adam in charge.</v>

00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:37.920
<v Speaker 3>So when Adam, the head, fell, all the stuff fell.</v>

00:15:37.920 --> 00:15:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Everything fell.</v>

00:15:38.800 --> 00:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>The animals fell.</v>

00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>There would not be death without Adam's sin.</v>

00:15:43.280 --> 00:15:44.960
<v Speaker 3>You and I die today.</v>

00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Our animals die, our pets die.</v>

00:15:47.280 --> 00:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Death that's today such a natural part of our lives and of</v>

00:15:51.360 --> 00:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the world</v>

00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:56.000
<v Speaker 3>was introduced by Adamson.</v>

00:15:56.000 --> 00:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>So to begin, just gonna read a a couple passages that use</v>

00:16:00.640 --> 00:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the word in Greek cosmos.</v>

00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Same word, it's where we get the word.</v>

00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And it means everything.</v>

00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>It means it's more than simply limited to humankind or mankind.</v>

00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>The first passage is from Romans five.</v>

00:16:16.560 --> 00:16:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man and</v>

00:16:20.160 --> 00:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all</v>

00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>sinned. This is very clear.</v>

00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Romans 5 is saying, death came into the world, into the cosmos</v>

00:16:31.120 --> 00:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>by Adam's sin.</v>

00:16:33.040 --> 00:16:34.400
<v Speaker 3>That's reiterated</v>

00:16:35.600 --> 00:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in John 1.</v>

00:16:37.520 --> 00:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>The next day, John the Baptist saw Jesus coming toward him and</v>

00:16:40.800 --> 00:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>said, Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of</v>

00:16:44.480 --> 00:16:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the world.</v>

00:16:45.920 --> 00:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Same word here.</v>

00:16:47.360 --> 00:16:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Sin of the world is the sin of the cosmos, Meaning all</v>

00:16:50.240 --> 00:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the sin everywhere.</v>

00:16:51.520 --> 00:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, this these this in particular is a passage that some of</v>

00:16:54.160 --> 00:16:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the reformed must necessarily dispute if they believe in limited atonement, because</v>

00:16:59.840 --> 00:17:04.160
<v Speaker 3>if you you you must necessarily limit world down to not only</v>

00:17:04.160 --> 00:17:08.720
<v Speaker 3>humanity but to the elect, otherwise you have to reject that verse.</v>

00:17:08.720 --> 00:17:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So these are some places where one of the reasons it's important</v>

00:17:12.080 --> 00:17:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to tackle this question is that when the six days of creation</v>

00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>are undermined.</v>

00:17:17.040 --> 00:17:19.200
<v Speaker 3>When you start messing with</v>

00:17:20.720 --> 00:17:24.560
<v Speaker 3>the question of how God created things, it goes directly to the</v>

00:17:24.560 --> 00:17:26.240
<v Speaker 3>question of original sin.</v>

00:17:26.240 --> 00:17:30.080
<v Speaker 3>And that is fundamentally what is attacked by a denial of the</v>

00:17:30.080 --> 00:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>sixth natural twenty-four-hour day creation.</v>

00:17:32.800 --> 00:17:37.040
<v Speaker 3>It is fundamentally an attack on these passages, on the fact that</v>

00:17:37.040 --> 00:17:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the whole universe fell when Adam sinned.</v>

00:17:40.560 --> 00:17:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And the last passage that make this abundantly clear using the word</v>

00:17:43.840 --> 00:17:46.800
<v Speaker 3>cosmos is Colossians one.</v>

00:17:46.800 --> 00:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all</v>

00:17:49.840 --> 00:17:53.440
<v Speaker 3>creation, for by him all things were created in heaven and on</v>

00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:58.640
<v Speaker 3>earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions, or rulers or authorities,</v>

00:17:58.640 --> 00:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>all things were created through him and for him, and he is</v>

00:18:02.320 --> 00:18:06.160
<v Speaker 3>before all things, and in him all things hold together, and he</v>

00:18:06.160 --> 00:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>is the head of the body, the church, he is the beginning,</v>

00:18:08.320 --> 00:18:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent.</v>

00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:16.240
<v Speaker 3>For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell,</v>

00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>and through him to reconcile himself to all things, whether on earth</v>

00:18:21.280 --> 00:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.</v>

00:18:25.520 --> 00:18:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So when Colossians one says that Jesus reconciles himself to all things,</v>

00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:35.360
<v Speaker 3>that's also talking about the cosmos, in earth or in heaven, the</v>

00:18:35.360 --> 00:18:36.240
<v Speaker 3>earth in heaven.</v>

00:18:36.480 --> 00:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>it's talking about all the stuff, all the universe, all of creation.</v>

00:18:41.200 --> 00:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Jesus reconciliation on the cross is not limited to man.</v>

00:18:46.160 --> 00:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Forget the elect, it's not simply limited to man, it's limited to</v>

00:18:49.760 --> 00:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>nothing. God reconciles and makes peace by his blood on the cross</v>

00:18:55.600 --> 00:18:57.360
<v Speaker 3>all things.</v>

00:18:57.360 --> 00:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

00:18:59.120 --> 00:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>this is the reason that this is such a crucial question for</v>

00:19:02.800 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the Christian faith.</v>

00:19:04.160 --> 00:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Because see, it's it's small fiddly point.</v>

00:19:06.080 --> 00:19:08.880
<v Speaker 3>If you want to just argue about six natural 20, four hour</v>

00:19:08.880 --> 00:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>days, okay, well, whatever.</v>

00:19:10.320 --> 00:19:12.720
<v Speaker 3>When you get to the fact that all the stuff we're going</v>

00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>to talk about in the latter part of the episode dealing with</v>

00:19:15.200 --> 00:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the so called scientific evidence, all of it necessarily involves death existing</v>

00:19:19.760 --> 00:19:23.120
<v Speaker 3>before Adam sinned, which has to deny all this.</v>

00:19:23.120 --> 00:19:26.400
<v Speaker 3>It has to say that Adam's sin did not cause the universe</v>

00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>to fall.</v>

00:19:27.200 --> 00:19:29.280
<v Speaker 3>There was no sin anywhere in the universe.</v>

00:19:29.280 --> 00:19:34.640
<v Speaker 3>And incidentally, these passages also preclude the existence of life anywhere else.</v>

00:19:34.640 --> 00:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>There can only be salvation where this promise has been given.</v>

00:19:39.600 --> 00:19:41.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the only place where there's life because it's the only</v>

00:19:41.760 --> 00:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>place where God delivered his salvation.</v>

00:19:44.960 --> 00:19:48.480
<v Speaker 3>The existence of Adam as the head of</v>

00:19:49.360 --> 00:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>this world necessitates that although the rest of the universe fell, there</v>

00:19:54.320 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 3>can't be life elsewhere that would not have access to this information.</v>

00:19:59.680 --> 00:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:04.160
<v Speaker 3>this is a it's a it's the root of the Christian faith.</v>

00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>If you get rid of of original sin, if you get rid</v>

00:20:07.760 --> 00:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that by whom all things were made through Christ</v>

00:20:11.840 --> 00:20:16.240
<v Speaker 3>is the same Christ through whom all things are reconciled, that's the</v>

00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:17.680
<v Speaker 3>whole shooting match.</v>

00:20:17.680 --> 00:20:20.320
<v Speaker 3>And see, it's this is one of those end runs that Satan</v>

00:20:20.320 --> 00:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>loves to do.</v>

00:20:21.280 --> 00:20:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Satan doesn't go directly at stuff and say, Well, Jesus didn't die</v>

00:20:24.160 --> 00:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>for the whole world.</v>

00:20:25.040 --> 00:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>He'll say, Oh, well, there's there was death before Adam.</v>

00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>And then it unwinds everything.</v>

00:20:29.520 --> 00:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Because if you believe there was death before Adam, well then what</v>

00:20:32.640 --> 00:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>what did Jesus die for?</v>

00:20:33.840 --> 00:20:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly Jesus propitiating death on blood on the cross get gets very</v>

00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>limited. It gets narrowed down to to a sliver of the very</v>

00:20:42.080 --> 00:20:46.400
<v Speaker 3>creation that God Himself said he was redeeming, because it was only</v>

00:20:46.400 --> 00:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>through the death of the one through whom it was created that</v>

00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that redemption would have been possible.</v>

00:20:52.160 --> 00:20:56.080
<v Speaker 3>The other passage in Romans 8 that is perhaps the most clear</v>

00:20:56.080 --> 00:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>on this point is one that doesn't use the word cosmos.</v>

00:21:00.240 --> 00:21:03.600
<v Speaker 3>It uses a different Greek word that also means creation.</v>

00:21:03.600 --> 00:21:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Effectively it's it's related to the next ex nihilo creation creation of</v>

00:21:08.880 --> 00:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>everything. So again, that is vastly superseding the elect or even mankind</v>

00:21:14.720 --> 00:21:15.920
<v Speaker 3>or even life.</v>

00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:17.440
<v Speaker 3>It's all the stuff.</v>

00:21:17.440 --> 00:21:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Everything that was created in the six days is what is being</v>

00:21:21.120 --> 00:21:26.000
<v Speaker 3>referred to here in this passage in Romans eight.</v>

00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not</v>

00:21:29.280 --> 00:21:32.640
<v Speaker 3>worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us,</v>

00:21:32.640 --> 00:21:36.000
<v Speaker 3>for the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the</v>

00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>sons of God, for the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly,</v>

00:21:41.040 --> 00:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation</v>

00:21:44.560 --> 00:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain</v>

00:21:48.960 --> 00:21:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the freedom of the glory of the children of God.</v>

00:21:51.600 --> 00:21:55.280
<v Speaker 3>For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in</v>

00:21:55.280 --> 00:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the pains of childbirth until now, and not only the creation, but</v>

00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:02.000
<v Speaker 3>we ourselves, who have who have the first fruits of the Spirits,</v>

00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>groan inwardly as we wait we eagerly for the adoption as sons,</v>

00:22:06.080 --> 00:22:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the redemption of our bodies.</v>

00:22:07.840 --> 00:22:09.680
<v Speaker 3>For in this hope we are saved.</v>

00:22:09.680 --> 00:22:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Now hope that is seen is not hope, for who hopes for</v>

00:22:12.720 --> 00:22:13.520
<v Speaker 3>what he sees?</v>

00:22:13.520 --> 00:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait</v>

00:22:16.080 --> 00:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>for it with patience.</v>

00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:22.320
<v Speaker 3>So here in this passage in Romans eight, Paul, in God's words,</v>

00:22:22.320 --> 00:22:27.600
<v Speaker 3>is explicitly contrasting the whole world with we the believers.</v>

00:22:27.600 --> 00:22:33.120
<v Speaker 3>So again, there's just to hammer this point home, there is no</v>

00:22:33.120 --> 00:22:39.360
<v Speaker 3>possibility that all of creation did not fall with Adam's personal sin.</v>

00:22:39.360 --> 00:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>The very same sin that you inherit, the very very same sin</v>

00:22:42.560 --> 00:22:47.280
<v Speaker 3>that causes you to yourself sin and to die.</v>

00:22:47.280 --> 00:22:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Adam's sin did that to everything.</v>

00:22:51.200 --> 00:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And so as we get into the things that will address the</v>

00:22:55.200 --> 00:22:58.720
<v Speaker 3>claims that, well, maybe the earth is millions of years old, and</v>

00:22:58.800 --> 00:23:02.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's it's okay to believe that because you know we're</v>

00:23:02.080 --> 00:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>we're not really sure because the you know the genre of Genesis</v>

00:23:04.880 --> 00:23:05.280
<v Speaker 3>1 and 2.</v>

00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:07.280
<v Speaker 3>It could be anything.</v>

00:23:07.280 --> 00:23:08.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to read that literally.</v>

00:23:08.960 --> 00:23:13.840
<v Speaker 3>If you do that, you necessarily deny the death entered the world</v>

00:23:13.840 --> 00:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>with Adam.</v>

00:23:14.800 --> 00:23:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And if you do that, you deny the faith.</v>

00:23:16.720 --> 00:23:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Because if you deny original sin and you deny how God redeems</v>

00:23:20.640 --> 00:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the universe, that's a denial of God.</v>

00:23:24.240 --> 00:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>So just by itself, the fact that original sin applies to the</v>

00:23:29.840 --> 00:23:35.280
<v Speaker 3>whole world as scripture attests, necessarily negates the possibility of any sort</v>

00:23:35.280 --> 00:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>of theistic evolution, any sort of theistic evolution.</v>

00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:44.240
<v Speaker 3>There's no possibility for any of the evolutionary macro scale processes that</v>

00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:46.800
<v Speaker 3>we're all familiar with from school.</v>

00:23:46.800 --> 00:23:48.960
<v Speaker 3>They cannot exist without death.</v>

00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's literally one or the other.</v>

00:23:51.040 --> 00:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Either death came into the world through Adam, as God says, or</v>

00:23:55.360 --> 00:23:57.120
<v Speaker 3>death has always just been a natural thing</v>

00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, eventually, you know, God made people or you know,</v>

00:24:02.800 --> 00:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>somehow people came to be.</v>

00:24:04.560 --> 00:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>And then we're off the races.</v>

00:24:06.320 --> 00:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Then we have the period of of human existence.</v>

00:24:09.920 --> 00:24:13.200
<v Speaker 3>To believe the latter is to deny God and to not be</v>

00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Christian. That there's a very clear dividing line there.</v>

00:24:17.280 --> 00:24:20.880
<v Speaker 3>And that's why that the lie that I mentioned earlier where guys</v>

00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:23.920
<v Speaker 3>will say, oh well, the early church fathers debated over the six</v>

00:24:23.920 --> 00:24:25.680
<v Speaker 3>days, the hexameron.</v>

00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:28.640
<v Speaker 3>they'll say, well that you know, they weren't sure, you know, sometimes</v>

00:24:28.640 --> 00:24:31.280
<v Speaker 3>said some said it was six twenty four hour days, somet said</v>

00:24:31.360 --> 00:24:32.560
<v Speaker 3>it was a different period of time.</v>

00:24:32.560 --> 00:24:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Yep. The ones who said it was a different period of time</v>

00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:35.840
<v Speaker 3>said it was instant.</v>

00:24:35.840 --> 00:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>They were they were debating inside of 168 hours how much shorter</v>

00:24:39.920 --> 00:24:40.720
<v Speaker 3>might it have been.</v>

00:24:40.720 --> 00:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, I believe they were wrong, but even if they got that</v>

00:24:45.840 --> 00:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>right, it it doesn't matter because the very fact that there was</v>

00:24:48.800 --> 00:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>a dispute in the historic church</v>

00:24:51.680 --> 00:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>never, ever, ever opened the door for someone to believe that the</v>

00:24:56.720 --> 00:25:01.440
<v Speaker 3>earth or the universe is older than several thousand years old.</v>

00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Now one thing that we mentioned in the episode six on the</v>

00:25:05.840 --> 00:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>perspecuity of scripture is that yeah, the most obvious thing is when</v>

00:25:10.240 --> 00:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>we take measurements of things, obviously, you know, if if a if</v>

00:25:15.360 --> 00:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>you believe what Christians have believed throughout history, the earth is about</v>

00:25:19.600 --> 00:25:22.400
<v Speaker 3>six thousand years, you know, maybe seven, it's somewhere in there.</v>

00:25:22.400 --> 00:25:24.880
<v Speaker 3>It's thousands of years old, certainly less than ten.</v>

00:25:24.880 --> 00:25:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Corey and I believe six, but if you want to be off</v>

00:25:27.760 --> 00:25:29.840
<v Speaker 3>by a thousand years, that's fine.</v>

00:25:29.840 --> 00:25:34.000
<v Speaker 3>That's fundamentally a question of some of the variations in the genealogies</v>

00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:37.200
<v Speaker 3>of scripture, which is how we calculate those dates.</v>

00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:42.160
<v Speaker 3>The difference is that if you go back further than that, you</v>

00:25:42.160 --> 00:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>can't believe anything that's in the Bible.</v>

00:25:45.440 --> 00:25:49.840
<v Speaker 3>And yet, if say say that say everything's inside 10,000 years, well,</v>

00:25:49.840 --> 00:25:53.520
<v Speaker 3>that would mean that if there's any light coming to Earth from</v>

00:25:53.520 --> 00:25:57.840
<v Speaker 3>any system more than ten thousand light years away, it can't exist.</v>

00:25:57.840 --> 00:26:00.400
<v Speaker 3>It would mean that the furthest away that we could see anything</v>

00:26:00.400 --> 00:26:03.360
<v Speaker 3>would be six thousand light years or seven thousand.</v>

00:26:03.360 --> 00:26:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Nothing could be, you know, billions of light years away.</v>

00:26:06.880 --> 00:26:08.640
<v Speaker 3>It that's impossible.</v>

00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.240
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely true.</v>

00:26:10.240 --> 00:26:15.280
<v Speaker 3>If when God created the universe in the six days, he booted</v>

00:26:15.280 --> 00:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>it up from scratch.</v>

00:26:17.040 --> 00:26:20.000
<v Speaker 3>And so the argument that we make in in episode six is</v>

00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that that's not at all the case.</v>

00:26:21.840 --> 00:26:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Just as Adam was created as a full grown sexually mature man</v>

00:26:26.400 --> 00:26:29.680
<v Speaker 3>with an age, Cory and I believe that he was seventy.</v>

00:26:29.680 --> 00:26:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Because if Adam was created as a seventy year old, that would</v>

00:26:31.760 --> 00:26:33.120
<v Speaker 3>make him an elder.</v>

00:26:33.120 --> 00:26:37.040
<v Speaker 3>It would mean that when he died at 930 years, he was</v>

00:26:37.040 --> 00:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>effectively a one thousand-year-old man.</v>

00:26:38.960 --> 00:26:40.880
<v Speaker 3>It would make him the oldest man ever.</v>

00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>It would make him living a thousand years, which is a perfectly</v>

00:26:43.920 --> 00:26:48.080
<v Speaker 3>round scriptural number, it would have made him an elder over creation,</v>

00:26:48.080 --> 00:26:51.920
<v Speaker 3>which would have incidentally been necessary for him to have the very</v>

00:26:51.920 --> 00:26:54.800
<v Speaker 3>headship over creation that God had ordained.</v>

00:26:54.800 --> 00:26:57.120
<v Speaker 3>So if we're wrong about that, no big deal.</v>

00:26:57.120 --> 00:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>But</v>

00:26:58.880 --> 00:27:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Adam was created with an age.</v>

00:27:00.800 --> 00:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>He was an he was an adult.</v>

00:27:02.080 --> 00:27:02.880
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't a child.</v>

00:27:02.880 --> 00:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't a baby.</v>

00:27:03.600 --> 00:27:05.840
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't an infant or a zygote.</v>

00:27:05.840 --> 00:27:07.280
<v Speaker 3>He had an age.</v>

00:27:07.280 --> 00:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>The universe also has an age.</v>

00:27:09.040 --> 00:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>And it didn't match because it didn't need to match, because God</v>

00:27:11.520 --> 00:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>had not yet established the order of everything.</v>

00:27:14.320 --> 00:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, the things that we observe today as constants, as scientific</v>

00:27:19.360 --> 00:27:23.040
<v Speaker 3>universal constants, those are God's variables.</v>

00:27:23.040 --> 00:27:25.440
<v Speaker 3>They're whatever He set them to be.</v>

00:27:26.800 --> 00:27:30.080
<v Speaker 3>The comparison that came to mind when I was thinking about preparing</v>

00:27:30.080 --> 00:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>for the show was</v>

00:27:32.080 --> 00:27:35.440
<v Speaker 3>when I was in school, there a game came out from, you</v>

00:27:35.440 --> 00:27:40.240
<v Speaker 3>know, everybody knows Sene Halo from Bungie before Microsoft acquired them.</v>

00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Bungie's first game was Marathon.</v>

00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:45.520
<v Speaker 3>And one of the amazing things about Marathon, it was around the</v>

00:27:45.520 --> 00:27:46.400
<v Speaker 3>same time as Doom.</v>

00:27:46.400 --> 00:27:48.000
<v Speaker 3>It was a little bit newer than Doom.</v>

00:27:48.000 --> 00:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>It was much more advanced in a lot of ways.</v>

00:27:50.080 --> 00:27:53.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the amazing things about playing Marathon, a first-person shooter, was</v>

00:27:53.680 --> 00:27:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that they m Bungie shipped the same map editors that they themselves</v>

00:27:58.880 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>used to make the game, which meant that anyone could make their</v>

00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:02.400
<v Speaker 3>own maps.</v>

00:28:02.400 --> 00:28:04.480
<v Speaker 3>And so people had a lot of fun playing with them.</v>

00:28:04.480 --> 00:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things that really kind of expanded my mind</v>

00:28:07.040 --> 00:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>just from messing with that was in the level editor, you could</v>

00:28:11.040 --> 00:28:12.480
<v Speaker 3>mess with constants.</v>

00:28:12.480 --> 00:28:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So every level had a constant for gravity.</v>

00:28:15.120 --> 00:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And one of the most entertaining levels was when was when guys</v>

00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:19.200
<v Speaker 3>would change gravity.</v>

00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>They would, you know, they would reduce it by 90%.</v>

00:28:21.840 --> 00:28:25.280
<v Speaker 3>So you could suddenly jump huge distances.</v>

00:28:25.280 --> 00:28:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Because gravity, the gravitational constant, there's just a variable in the table</v>

00:28:29.680 --> 00:28:31.040
<v Speaker 3>for the level editor.</v>

00:28:31.040 --> 00:28:33.280
<v Speaker 3>God did the same thing with the universe.</v>

00:28:33.280 --> 00:28:37.440
<v Speaker 3>He set these numbers seemingly in stone, but he ordained them.</v>

00:28:37.440 --> 00:28:38.160
<v Speaker 3>He set them.</v>

00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>And so we're stuck with them.</v>

00:28:39.440 --> 00:28:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Like we we don't have the level at her.</v>

00:28:41.360 --> 00:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>We can't mess with creation.</v>

00:28:43.360 --> 00:28:47.600
<v Speaker 3>But the point is that when God ordained those things that to</v>

00:28:47.600 --> 00:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>us seem like constants, they're only constants because he liked them.</v>

00:28:51.200 --> 00:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't know why.</v>

00:28:52.000 --> 00:28:53.600
<v Speaker 3>He just he picked them and they work.</v>

00:28:53.600 --> 00:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>And everything in the universe works because of them, because of how</v>

00:28:57.120 --> 00:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>precisely tuned they are to the world that God created.</v>

00:29:01.520 --> 00:29:04.400
<v Speaker 3>If the numbers were different, we can tell in simulations that everything</v>

00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:05.680
<v Speaker 3>would go flying apart.</v>

00:29:05.680 --> 00:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>So it's all a perfectly balanced system from our perspective.</v>

00:29:09.520 --> 00:29:13.120
<v Speaker 3>The important thing is that God set what he wanted.</v>

00:29:13.120 --> 00:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And so is the earth six thousand years old?</v>

00:29:16.720 --> 00:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Is the earth four and a half billion years old?</v>

00:29:19.280 --> 00:29:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes. God created a four and a half billion year old Earth</v>

00:29:23.440 --> 00:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>six thousand years ago.</v>

00:29:25.040 --> 00:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>He created a thirteen point eight billion year old universe six thousand</v>

00:29:29.040 --> 00:29:30.320
<v Speaker 3>years ago, give or take.</v>

00:29:30.320 --> 00:29:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Again, not sticking to the six thousand number, but the creation of</v>

00:29:34.560 --> 00:29:38.880
<v Speaker 3>an old universe and an old earth is entirely consistent with the</v>

00:29:38.880 --> 00:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>belief of a God who can create everything from nothing simply by</v>

00:29:42.400 --> 00:29:47.120
<v Speaker 3>speaking. So that is an article of faith, but it's no stretch.</v>

00:29:47.120 --> 00:29:50.640
<v Speaker 3>If you if if you can't believe that, then you certainly can't</v>

00:29:50.640 --> 00:29:53.280
<v Speaker 3>believe any of the miracles in the Bible.</v>

00:29:53.280 --> 00:29:56.560
<v Speaker 3>And so the the crucial point that I want the the Christians</v>

00:29:56.560 --> 00:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in the audience to take home from this is that when we</v>

00:30:00.000 --> 00:30:03.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the evidence, when we talk about the scientific stuff for</v>

00:30:03.040 --> 00:30:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the rest of this, it's not to bolster our faith.</v>

00:30:05.600 --> 00:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not to justify what we already believe.</v>

00:30:08.160 --> 00:30:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It is that we have confidence in our faith that when God,</v>

00:30:10.880 --> 00:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>who created the universe, says these things, we just believe them.</v>

00:30:14.080 --> 00:30:18.560
<v Speaker 3>And then, as we understand creation better, as Christians have always done</v>

00:30:18.640 --> 00:30:23.760
<v Speaker 3>for thousands of years, discovery of God's creation, as God testifies in</v>

00:30:23.760 --> 00:30:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Job, testifies to God.</v>

00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:31.520
<v Speaker 3>God uses creation to testify to us about his own glory.</v>

00:30:31.520 --> 00:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>So when we look at these things and we see how magnificently,</v>

00:30:34.800 --> 00:30:39.200
<v Speaker 3>incomprehensibly huge the world is, that testifies that God's glory.</v>

00:30:39.840 --> 00:30:42.000
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't make us small and insignificant.</v>

00:30:42.000 --> 00:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>It makes God huge.</v>

00:30:43.440 --> 00:30:47.280
<v Speaker 3>The fact that the scale makes us seem small doesn't diminish the</v>

00:30:47.280 --> 00:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>importance of humanity.</v>

00:30:48.800 --> 00:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>It shows that of all the things in creation that testify to</v>

00:30:52.720 --> 00:30:56.000
<v Speaker 3>God's glory, he came as a man.</v>

00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:59.440
<v Speaker 3>We were made in his image, and then he came as one</v>

00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>of us to redeem us and all things because of Adam's sin.</v>

00:31:03.440 --> 00:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's no it's either you believe the Bible or you believe</v>

00:31:07.040 --> 00:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Bill Mai.</v>

00:31:08.000 --> 00:31:10.480
<v Speaker 3>And unfortunately, we have a lot of people in the church today</v>

00:31:10.480 --> 00:31:12.960
<v Speaker 3>who want to believe Bill Nye and stay in the church.</v>

00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:13.920
<v Speaker 3>And it's like</v>

00:31:15.040 --> 00:31:16.000
<v Speaker 3>what do you say?</v>

00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Like there's there are two different approaches to this.</v>

00:31:18.880 --> 00:31:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And for peop people who are in the middle, I hope you</v>

00:31:21.120 --> 00:31:22.960
<v Speaker 3>take that contrast seriously.</v>

00:31:23.280 --> 00:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the I love science atheists, the Reddit atheists, they will believe any</v>

00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:28.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of absurdity.</v>

00:31:28.800 --> 00:31:32.160
<v Speaker 3>The same people who are adamant that we are stupid, that we're</v>

00:31:32.160 --> 00:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>rubs for thinking that the Earth is six thousand years old.</v>

00:31:35.040 --> 00:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Also today think we're rubes for thinking that a man is a</v>

00:31:38.320 --> 00:31:40.560
<v Speaker 3>man and a woman is a woman.</v>

00:31:40.560 --> 00:31:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Like this the the idol of science, the false god of science,</v>

00:31:45.840 --> 00:31:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that is in fact no science at all, because scantia means truth,</v>

00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>knowledge. The absence of truth and knowledge it means that there's nothing</v>

00:31:54.400 --> 00:31:58.800
<v Speaker 3>related to to science That's just it's a false religion.</v>

00:31:58.800 --> 00:32:02.800
<v Speaker 3>And so just as the church has been used as a cloak</v>

00:32:02.800 --> 00:32:07.280
<v Speaker 3>for a false religion that's Jesus flavored, the pursuit of knowledge of</v>

00:32:07.280 --> 00:32:11.120
<v Speaker 3>creation is a cloak that's being used by these atheists to to</v>

00:32:11.120 --> 00:32:16.000
<v Speaker 3>be a a a cloaking device for them to twist the creation</v>

00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that was intended by God to testify to his glory.</v>

00:32:18.720 --> 00:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>They try to use it to testify to</v>

00:32:20.960 --> 00:32:21.120
uh

00:32:21.520 --> 00:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I</v>

00:32:21.680 --> 00:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know what, to to the absence of God.</v>

00:32:24.320 --> 00:32:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Which if facially is absurd.</v>

00:32:26.800 --> 00:32:29.600
<v Speaker 3>And so that's gonna be the rest of this episode.</v>

00:32:29.600 --> 00:32:29.840
You

00:32:29.840 --> 00:32:34.960
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Bill Nye and I always find him particularly amusing because inevitably</v>

00:32:35.200 --> 00:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the I love science crowd are credentialist in their leanings, and Bill</v>

00:32:40.880 --> 00:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Nye is a mechanical engineer, and they take his word as a</v>

00:32:45.760 --> 00:32:49.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of gospel on things about which he has no formal training</v>

00:32:49.680 --> 00:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever, so it's just a little bit of hypocrisy from that crowd,</v>

00:32:54.160 --> 00:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>not surprising.</v>

00:32:56.640 --> 00:33:04.080
<v Speaker 2>But before we dive into the science property I'll take the opportunity</v>

00:33:04.400 --> 00:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>to critique the simulation theory because you mentioned that if we change</v>

00:33:08.400 --> 00:33:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the constants in a simulation of whatever body it happens to be,</v>

00:33:13.360 --> 00:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>things don't work so well.</v>

00:33:15.360 --> 00:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>The fundamental problem with simulation theory, and I've mentioned this elsewhere, is</v>

00:33:19.600 --> 00:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that any evidence for us existing in a simulation is simultaneously evidence</v>

00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>for a creator.</v>

00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And Ockham's razor or however you prefer to phrase it, it is</v>

00:33:34.160 --> 00:33:37.520
<v Speaker 2>more reasonable to conclude there is a creator than that there is</v>

00:33:37.520 --> 00:33:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a simulation.</v>

00:33:38.800 --> 00:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So it is actually impossible to prove simulation theory because any evidence</v>

00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>for it is simply proving a creator even more strongly.</v>

00:33:51.440 --> 00:33:55.920
<v Speaker 2>But at the outset of this segment, the balance of this podcast</v>

00:33:55.920 --> 00:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>episode, there are five questions I want to highlight that are relevant</v>

00:34:01.600 --> 00:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>here. These are questions that science simply cannot answer, and we're using</v>

00:34:05.600 --> 00:34:10.320
<v Speaker 2>science, of course, here in the lowercase sense, as it were, the</v>

00:34:10.320 --> 00:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>minor sense, the modern sense, not the proper Latin sense of the</v>

00:34:14.880 --> 00:34:17.520
<v Speaker 2>term, which as mentioned is just knowledge.</v>

00:34:17.520 --> 00:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>And it is fair also to say that is truth, because what</v>

00:34:20.480 --> 00:34:21.200
<v Speaker 2>is knowledge?</v>

00:34:21.200 --> 00:34:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It is true warranted belief, to use the philosophical definition.</v>

00:34:25.280 --> 00:34:26.800
<v Speaker 2>So the five questions</v>

00:34:27.840 --> 00:34:32.000
<v Speaker 2>First, why is there anything instead of nothing?</v>

00:34:33.120 --> 00:34:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Science has no answer for this.</v>

00:34:34.800 --> 00:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Science has no way of answering this.</v>

00:34:37.200 --> 00:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Second, why do immaterial things exist and not just material?</v>

00:34:45.440 --> 00:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Or phrased another way, why is there immaterial, not just material?</v>

00:34:51.200 --> 00:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that the distinction there, why that matters.</v>

00:34:55.680 --> 00:35:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Third, why is there life instead of just matter?</v>

00:35:01.360 --> 00:35:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Science has no answer to bridge the gap from non living matter</v>

00:35:06.000 --> 00:35:08.640
<v Speaker 2>to living matter to life.</v>

00:35:08.640 --> 00:35:13.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a biogenesis, life arising from non-life.</v>

00:35:13.120 --> 00:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the things for which the I Love Science</v>

00:35:17.200 --> 00:35:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Crowd and others will often ridicule our medieval ancestors, because they believed</v>

00:35:22.400 --> 00:35:24.720
<v Speaker 2>in abiogenesis of a certain kind.</v>

00:35:24.720 --> 00:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>They thought, for instance, if you left meat out, it spawned maggots.</v>

00:35:28.560 --> 00:35:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Which is more or less true from their perspective.</v>

00:35:30.640 --> 00:35:32.480
<v Speaker 2>They observed it, that's what happened.</v>

00:35:32.480 --> 00:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>They did not have a vacuum chamber, they couldn't isolate the meat</v>

00:35:35.360 --> 00:35:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to prove that no you actually need a fly to come and</v>

00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:40.880
<v Speaker 2>lay eggs on the thing, and then it produces maggots.</v>

00:35:40.880 --> 00:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>They didn't know that.</v>

00:35:41.520 --> 00:35:44.720
<v Speaker 2>They had no way to test that.</v>

00:35:44.720 --> 00:35:50.720
<v Speaker 2>But modern theories of evolution rely on abiogenesis.</v>

00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:52.320
<v Speaker 2>very thing they mock.</v>

00:35:52.320 --> 00:35:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And you can get them with this, incidentally.</v>

00:35:54.320 --> 00:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>You can start to describe a biogenesis and they'll laugh along with</v>

00:35:58.560 --> 00:36:00.880
<v Speaker 2>you, they'll think it's ridiculous, but then you point out that no,</v>

00:36:00.880 --> 00:36:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about the very basis of the Neo Darwinian evolution you</v>

00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:08.480
<v Speaker 2>believe. They turn bright red, it's good fun to watch.</v>

00:36:08.480 --> 00:36:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Fourth, why is there intelligent life?</v>

00:36:11.120 --> 00:36:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Because there is a fundamental distinction between something that is merely alive</v>

00:36:14.880 --> 00:36:19.360
<v Speaker 2>and something that is intelligent, something that has that inner life to</v>

00:36:19.360 --> 00:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a certain degree.</v>

00:36:21.120 --> 00:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>And I say a certain degree because I distinguish between them in</v>

00:36:24.640 --> 00:36:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the next question, but there is a difference between broccoli and a</v>

00:36:28.240 --> 00:36:33.920
<v Speaker 2>cat. A cat is intelligent life, broccoli is not.</v>

00:36:33.920 --> 00:36:39.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you explain that within the framework of science?</v>

00:36:39.520 --> 00:36:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And then fifth, why is there sapient, which is to say human,</v>

00:36:44.640 --> 00:36:47.120
<v Speaker 2>self aware, life?</v>

00:36:47.120 --> 00:36:49.760
<v Speaker 2>This is really two questions in one.</v>

00:36:49.760 --> 00:36:54.480
<v Speaker 2>There's the easy problem of consciousness and the hard problem of consciousness.</v>

00:36:54.480 --> 00:36:59.360
<v Speaker 2>The easy problem is the mechanics of cognition.</v>

00:36:59.360 --> 00:37:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Objective experience.</v>

00:37:00.800 --> 00:37:08.400
<v Speaker 2>How do you explain the mechanic of human cognition, of self-awareness.</v>

00:37:08.400 --> 00:37:10.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you explain these systems?</v>

00:37:10.480 --> 00:37:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the hard problem of consciousness, which is the metaphysics</v>

00:37:14.480 --> 00:37:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of cognition.</v>

00:37:15.360 --> 00:37:17.760
<v Speaker 2>How do you explain subjective experience?</v>

00:37:17.760 --> 00:37:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Qualia, which is the personal subjective experience of</v>

00:37:22.240 --> 00:37:27.040
<v Speaker 2>something. A quale is the singular is a quality or property as</v>

00:37:27.040 --> 00:37:30.640
<v Speaker 2>perceived or experienced by a person.</v>

00:37:30.640 --> 00:37:35.760
<v Speaker 2>And so these are the questions that it's important to contemplate when</v>

00:37:35.760 --> 00:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with science's supposed explanations for everything.</v>

00:37:42.080 --> 00:37:44.640
<v Speaker 2>We won't go into each one of these in detail in this</v>

00:37:44.640 --> 00:37:48.720
<v Speaker 2>episode, but we will investigate at least two of them in a</v>

00:37:48.720 --> 00:37:53.280
<v Speaker 2>fair degree of detail.</v>

00:37:53.280 --> 00:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And so to start off, I want to start with a major</v>

00:37:58.000 --> 00:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>problem for Neo-Darwinian evolution, I'm going to use NDE or Neo-Darwinian evolution,</v>

00:38:04.560 --> 00:38:07.360
<v Speaker 2>because that's really a description of the modern</v>

00:38:08.320 --> 00:38:12.720
<v Speaker 2>version of evolution that is believed in the academy and the sciences.</v>

00:38:12.720 --> 00:38:16.000
<v Speaker 2>You could also call it the modern synthesis, there's technically a small</v>

00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:21.520
<v Speaker 2>distinction there, but I'll probably use them interchangeably because they effectively are.</v>

00:38:21.520 --> 00:38:25.120
<v Speaker 2>But the issue is irreducible complexity.</v>

00:38:25.120 --> 00:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>And irreducible complexity is</v>

00:38:28.000 --> 00:38:30.560
<v Speaker 2>how we describe a system</v>

00:38:31.440 --> 00:38:36.320
<v Speaker 2>that is complex in a way where if you remove any particular</v>

00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:39.520
<v Speaker 2>part of the system, it no longer functions, or at least no</v>

00:38:39.520 --> 00:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>longer functions at a level that makes the system useful.</v>

00:38:44.560 --> 00:38:46.640
<v Speaker 2>And there are many systems like this.</v>

00:38:46.640 --> 00:38:49.600
<v Speaker 2>There are many of them in your body, there are many of</v>

00:38:49.600 --> 00:38:51.760
<v Speaker 2>them out in nature.</v>

00:38:51.760 --> 00:38:56.320
<v Speaker 2>In these systems, any particular part of the system can be removed</v>

00:38:56.320 --> 00:38:58.640
<v Speaker 2>to make the system no longer function.</v>

00:38:58.640 --> 00:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And the problem with that is that if you believe the evolutionary</v>

00:39:02.640 --> 00:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>explanation for these things, then all of these components have to evolve</v>

00:39:08.160 --> 00:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously and synchronously.</v>

00:39:11.440 --> 00:39:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Because if one appears before another, they don't interoperate, they don't work</v>

00:39:16.240 --> 00:39:19.200
<v Speaker 2>together. Yes, in some cases,</v>

00:39:20.320 --> 00:39:24.800
<v Speaker 2>there are subparts of a system that may be useful in and</v>

00:39:24.800 --> 00:39:28.880
<v Speaker 2>of themselves, separate from the system itself.</v>

00:39:28.880 --> 00:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And for those, you don't need to deal with this irreducible complexity</v>

00:39:33.760 --> 00:39:35.920
<v Speaker 2>for that part of the system.</v>

00:39:35.920 --> 00:39:39.440
<v Speaker 2>For the rest of the system, you still do, but there are</v>

00:39:39.440 --> 00:39:44.400
<v Speaker 2>also systems where the subparts are not useful at least not in</v>

00:39:44.400 --> 00:39:49.200
<v Speaker 2>isolation, and so they are only useful in the system itself, and</v>

00:39:49.200 --> 00:39:51.920
<v Speaker 2>there are many of these in the body.</v>

00:39:51.920 --> 00:39:58.240
<v Speaker 2>In those systems there is no evolutionary way to explain the evolution</v>

00:39:58.240 --> 00:40:00.080
<v Speaker 2>of any particular subpart</v>

00:40:01.360 --> 00:40:07.760
<v Speaker 2>without having to explain the entirety of the system evolving at once.</v>

00:40:07.760 --> 00:40:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Now</v>

00:40:10.080 --> 00:40:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I've said that there's such thing as an irreducibly complex system.</v>

00:40:14.160 --> 00:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>You'll see this all over a certain kind of literature, and you</v>

00:40:18.240 --> 00:40:20.720
<v Speaker 2>will see this also incidentally from evolutionists.</v>

00:40:20.720 --> 00:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>They admit that this is a problem, to some degree.</v>

00:40:23.200 --> 00:40:27.680
<v Speaker 2>They try to dismiss it, but if you read their actual journals,</v>

00:40:27.680 --> 00:40:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the academic ones, they will admit there are problems here.</v>

00:40:31.920 --> 00:40:34.320
<v Speaker 2>But a fundamental point I want to make is that there is</v>

00:40:34.320 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 2>no such thing as a simple system.</v>

00:40:37.200 --> 00:40:38.960
<v Speaker 2>No system is simple.</v>

00:40:38.960 --> 00:40:41.440
<v Speaker 2>All systems are irreducibly complex.</v>

00:40:41.440 --> 00:40:43.200
<v Speaker 2>This is tautological.</v>

00:40:43.200 --> 00:40:49.520
<v Speaker 2>A system is an irreducibly complex set of things that interact in</v>

00:40:49.520 --> 00:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a particular way.</v>

00:40:50.640 --> 00:40:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Now a given system may have ancillary or additional parts of the</v>

00:40:57.280 --> 00:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>system that you can remove and the system will still function, but</v>

00:41:00.560 --> 00:41:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it is that core that is irreducibly complex.</v>

00:41:03.840 --> 00:41:06.320
<v Speaker 2>That is the core of the system.</v>

00:41:06.320 --> 00:41:09.840
<v Speaker 2>The other parts may be helpful, but if you can remove them,</v>

00:41:09.840 --> 00:41:12.640
<v Speaker 2>they are not part of the irreducible complexity</v>

00:41:16.560 --> 00:41:22.640
<v Speaker 2>For example, some of the systems in your body that are irreducibly</v>

00:41:22.640 --> 00:41:26.080
<v Speaker 2>complex. We'll go over two of them t just sort of in</v>

00:41:26.080 --> 00:41:27.280
<v Speaker 2>a cursory fashion.</v>

00:41:27.280 --> 00:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to go into all of the chemistry for this.</v>

00:41:30.320 --> 00:41:31.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to do that here.</v>

00:41:31.760 --> 00:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>If you are interested, it's very easy to find papers or a</v>

00:41:35.600 --> 00:41:39.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTube video or what have you on these subjects.</v>

00:41:39.040 --> 00:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>But But vision, your visual system, is irreducibly complex.</v>

00:41:45.680 --> 00:41:49.200
<v Speaker 2>There are parts of your visual system that if you take them</v>

00:41:49.200 --> 00:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>in isolation, they have no value.</v>

00:41:52.560 --> 00:41:57.920
<v Speaker 2>If you remove really any particular part of the complex system that</v>

00:41:57.920 --> 00:42:01.760
<v Speaker 2>results in you being able to see, you are no longer able</v>

00:42:01.760 --> 00:42:03.040
<v Speaker 2>to see.</v>

00:42:03.040 --> 00:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there are certain parts that you can impair and still see.</v>

00:42:07.520 --> 00:42:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course, some of you listening may be wearing glasses.</v>

00:42:10.800 --> 00:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>You can still see, with or without the glasses.</v>

00:42:14.400 --> 00:42:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Without the glasses your vision is impaired in some way, otherwise you</v>

00:42:17.840 --> 00:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't need the glasses.</v>

00:42:19.680 --> 00:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>But that isn't a removal</v>

00:42:21.840 --> 00:42:25.200
<v Speaker 2>of part of this complex system, it is an impairment, and as</v>

00:42:25.200 --> 00:42:28.560
<v Speaker 2>you can see, it causes problems.</v>

00:42:28.560 --> 00:42:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But the visual system for human beings, for mammals more generally, but</v>

00:42:34.080 --> 00:42:38.640
<v Speaker 2>phototransduction, which is just a fancy way of saying taking the light</v>

00:42:38.640 --> 00:42:43.200
<v Speaker 2>that is outside, external to you, strikes your eye, and translating it</v>

00:42:43.200 --> 00:42:45.360
<v Speaker 2>into a signal in the brain so that you can see.</v>

00:42:45.600 --> 00:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Translating into a picture.</v>

00:42:47.440 --> 00:42:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Phototransduction has about twelve steps.</v>

00:42:51.040 --> 00:42:55.120
<v Speaker 2>These are complicated chemical processes.</v>

00:42:55.120 --> 00:42:56.240
<v Speaker 2>This is biochemistry.</v>

00:42:56.240 --> 00:42:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I said I won't go over the specifics, there's no need here.</v>

00:42:59.920 --> 00:43:02.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's just to transmit</v>

00:43:03.840 --> 00:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that a single photon hit one of the receptive cells</v>

00:43:08.080 --> 00:43:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in your eye into your brain via the optical nerve to paint</v>

00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>that tiny part of a picture of the outside world, and this</v>

00:43:16.640 --> 00:43:20.240
<v Speaker 2>happens on the order of single or double digit depending on the</v>

00:43:20.240 --> 00:43:23.600
<v Speaker 2>cells involved, millisecond resolution.</v>

00:43:23.600 --> 00:43:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And this happens millions of times every single day.</v>

00:43:27.760 --> 00:43:35.360
<v Speaker 2>This happens across the many receptive cells in your eye constantly.</v>

00:43:35.360 --> 00:43:42.560
<v Speaker 2>This system is incomprehensibly complex and delicate, and it has to have</v>

00:43:42.560 --> 00:43:47.840
<v Speaker 2>all evolved simultaneously and synchronously in order for it to make any</v>

00:43:47.840 --> 00:43:53.840
<v Speaker 2>sense. Now, some, particularly Richard Dawkins comes to mind, have attempted to</v>

00:43:53.840 --> 00:43:58.720
<v Speaker 2>raise the argument that there are precursor systems to the mammalian eye,</v>

00:43:58.720 --> 00:44:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and therefore we can explain that we went from this to this</v>

00:44:02.560 --> 00:44:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to this and eventually got to the human eye.</v>

00:44:05.200 --> 00:44:09.280
<v Speaker 2>The problem is, if you look at the biochemistry, and this is</v>

00:44:09.280 --> 00:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a little game they play, I'll go over this in more detail</v>

00:44:11.680 --> 00:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>in a minute.</v>

00:44:12.560 --> 00:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at the biochemistry These simpler systems, supposedly simpler</v>

00:44:18.160 --> 00:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>systems, they are in a sense simpler, but in a sense not,</v>

00:44:22.000 --> 00:44:27.360
<v Speaker 2>because the idea that single cells are simple is archaic and wrong.</v>

00:44:27.360 --> 00:44:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Single cells are not simple, they are highly complex.</v>

00:44:32.640 --> 00:44:39.360
<v Speaker 2>But this idea that these supposed precursors are simple breaks down biochemically,</v>

00:44:39.360 --> 00:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and it breaks down biochemically because they are not a biochemical precursor.</v>

00:44:44.160 --> 00:44:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And this is the issue.</v>

00:44:46.000 --> 00:44:52.800
<v Speaker 2>There are three systems for any given function that have to develop</v>

00:44:52.800 --> 00:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously and synchronously.</v>

00:44:56.000 --> 00:44:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Because it's not just one overarching system.</v>

00:44:58.560 --> 00:45:00.960
<v Speaker 2>So for instance, let's stay with the eye.</v>

00:45:00.960 --> 00:45:05.120
<v Speaker 2>There's the mechanical, which is of course the muscles that move the</v>

00:45:05.120 --> 00:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>eye, the cells that comprise the eye, the lens that shields the</v>

00:45:09.600 --> 00:45:13.200
<v Speaker 2>eye, etcetera, there are many systems here.</v>

00:45:13.200 --> 00:45:17.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's the mechanical part of the overall system.</v>

00:45:17.280 --> 00:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>There is the chemical.</v>

00:45:19.040 --> 00:45:20.000
<v Speaker 2>All of these</v>

00:45:20.960 --> 00:45:26.880
<v Speaker 2>various chemicals that are transmitting information from one step to the next,</v>

00:45:26.880 --> 00:45:33.600
<v Speaker 2>translating it from a photon eventually into voltage gated by calcium that</v>

00:45:33.520 --> 00:45:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that transmits along the optic nerve into the brain.</v>

00:45:38.080 --> 00:45:40.560
<v Speaker 2>And then there are neurotransmitters involved.</v>

00:45:40.560 --> 00:45:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Th that's the chemical system.</v>

00:45:42.480 --> 00:45:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And then there is the neural system.</v>

00:45:44.800 --> 00:45:48.240
<v Speaker 2>The brain has to be able to interpret these signals.</v>

00:45:48.240 --> 00:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And the same thing is true of any other part of your</v>

00:45:50.160 --> 00:45:51.040
<v Speaker 2>body, your hand.</v>

00:45:51.040 --> 00:45:53.760
<v Speaker 2>You have fingers and a thumb, you have the nerves and the</v>

00:45:53.760 --> 00:45:57.200
<v Speaker 2>tendons, you have the chemicals that actuate the muscles, and you have</v>

00:45:57.200 --> 00:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the part of your brain that controls these things that receives the</v>

00:45:59.840 --> 00:46:02.720
<v Speaker 2>signals and sends them back.</v>

00:46:02.720 --> 00:46:08.800
<v Speaker 2>These three systems have to develop together because no single system is</v>

00:46:08.800 --> 00:46:11.040
<v Speaker 2>of any use in isolation.</v>

00:46:11.040 --> 00:46:16.720
<v Speaker 2>If you have this sea of chemicals, but no surface with which</v>

00:46:16.720 --> 00:46:21.600
<v Speaker 2>they can interact, no mechanics, no machinery they can operate, they're useless.</v>

00:46:21.600 --> 00:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>If you have the machinery and the chemicals, but no receptors in</v>

00:46:26.160 --> 00:46:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the brain to actually deal with them.</v>

00:46:27.920 --> 00:46:31.680
<v Speaker 2>The systems are utterly useless, in fact they are detrimental, because they</v>

00:46:31.680 --> 00:46:35.040
<v Speaker 2>incur an immense energy cost.</v>

00:46:35.040 --> 00:46:38.880
<v Speaker 2>These must develop simultaneously.</v>

00:46:38.880 --> 00:46:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It is incomprehensibly unlikely to the point of being mathematically impossible that</v>

00:46:44.880 --> 00:46:45.520
<v Speaker 2>this could happen.</v>

00:46:45.520 --> 00:46:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into the numbers a little later.</v>

00:46:48.160 --> 00:46:50.960
<v Speaker 2>But this is just for the vision system or for the hand</v>

00:46:51.040 --> 00:46:53.600
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned, and this is true of so many different systems</v>

00:46:53.600 --> 00:46:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in your body.</v>

00:46:55.440 --> 00:46:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Blood clotting is another one.</v>

00:46:59.040 --> 00:47:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Blood clotting is an excellent example because blood clotting again</v>

00:47:04.720 --> 00:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>seems like something that could be simple, but then you start to</v>

00:47:09.040 --> 00:47:10.080
<v Speaker 2>read about it.</v>

00:47:10.080 --> 00:47:12.400
<v Speaker 2>It is extremely complex.</v>

00:47:14.800 --> 00:47:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Blood clotting is a cascade of chemical reactions that have to fire</v>

00:47:21.760 --> 00:47:26.320
<v Speaker 2>perfectly. And the reason they have to fire perfectly, now bear in</v>

00:47:26.320 --> 00:47:30.000
<v Speaker 2>mind when I say perfectly, I'm not saying absolutely perfectly.</v>

00:47:30.000 --> 00:47:31.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a different thing here.</v>

00:47:31.520 --> 00:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying they cannot misfire.</v>

00:47:34.000 --> 00:47:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Because if blood clotting misfires, there are a handful of options.</v>

00:47:39.360 --> 00:47:44.800
<v Speaker 2>If you cut yourself and your coagulation system doesn't fire properly, maybe</v>

00:47:44.800 --> 00:47:48.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't clot and you bleed out, and you die.</v>

00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Or it triggers randomly, somewhere in your body, forms a clot, causes</v>

00:47:54.160 --> 00:47:58.320
<v Speaker 2>you a stroke, heart attack, what have you, you die.</v>

00:47:58.320 --> 00:48:02.800
<v Speaker 2>And so this system not only has to be able to trigger</v>

00:48:03.280 --> 00:48:07.280
<v Speaker 2>at the right time, in the right place, for the right period</v>

00:48:07.280 --> 00:48:12.720
<v Speaker 2>of time, and then shut down, it has to not accidentally trigger</v>

00:48:12.720 --> 00:48:16.240
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else in the body at the wrong time.</v>

00:48:16.240 --> 00:48:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, instead of going through the cascade of how blood clotting actually</v>

00:48:22.000 --> 00:48:24.160
<v Speaker 2>occurs, and there are actually two paths that</v>

00:48:25.120 --> 00:48:26.800
<v Speaker 2>trigger in a different way.</v>

00:48:26.800 --> 00:48:29.360
<v Speaker 2>There's some important reasons for that.</v>

00:48:29.360 --> 00:48:32.160
<v Speaker 2>There's still some research as to why exactly that is the case.</v>

00:48:32.160 --> 00:48:35.680
<v Speaker 2>But I want to read through just some of the factors, some</v>

00:48:35.680 --> 00:48:41.360
<v Speaker 2>of the chemical substances that are involved in blood clotting.</v>

00:48:41.360 --> 00:48:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Just to give you a sort of idea of how complex the</v>

00:48:45.040 --> 00:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>system is.</v>

00:48:46.560 --> 00:48:53.680
<v Speaker 2>There's factor one, fibrinogen, factor two, prothrombin, factor three, tissue factor,</v>

00:48:53.680 --> 00:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>factor four, the calcium ion, factor five, proacelarin, factor six, factor seven,</v>

00:49:00.560 --> 00:49:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Proconvertin Factor eight Antihemophilic Factor A Factor nine Antihemophilic Factor</v>

00:49:07.600 --> 00:49:14.720
<v Speaker 2>B, Factor ten, Stuart Prower factor, eleven, plasma thromboplastin antecedent, factor</v>

00:49:14.880 --> 00:49:20.400
<v Speaker 2>twelve, the Hagaman factor, factor thirteen, fibrin stabilizing factor, then there's the</v>

00:49:20.400 --> 00:49:27.520
<v Speaker 2>von Willibrand factor, precalocrine, calicrine, high molecular weight kinogen, fibronectin, anti</v>

00:49:27.760 --> 00:49:34.080
<v Speaker 2>thrombin three, Heparin COFACTOI, Protein C, Protein S, Protein Z, Protein Z</v>

00:49:34.240 --> 00:49:41.360
<v Speaker 2>related Protease Inhibitor, Plasminogen, Alpha II antiplasmin, Alpha II macroglobulin, tissue</v>

00:49:41.360 --> 00:49:48.560
<v Speaker 2>plasminogen activator, urokinase, plasminogen activator inhibitor one, plasminogen activator inhibitor</v>

00:49:48.560 --> 00:49:51.600
<v Speaker 2>two. And these all interact</v>

00:49:52.800 --> 00:49:57.760
<v Speaker 2>in a delicate dance that if it goes wrong, you die.</v>

00:49:57.760 --> 00:50:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And somehow we are supposed to believe that this evolved by chance.</v>

00:50:03.520 --> 00:50:04.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is a good point</v>

00:50:05.840 --> 00:50:10.880
<v Speaker 2>to highlight exactly what the evolutionists claim.</v>

00:50:10.880 --> 00:50:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Because they will up one side and down the other, in many</v>

00:50:14.000 --> 00:50:18.000
<v Speaker 2>cases, say they do not believe in random chance, but they do</v>

00:50:18.800 --> 00:50:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and here's why.</v>

00:50:20.800 --> 00:50:26.160
<v Speaker 2>They will highlight the natural selection part of their doctrine, of their</v>

00:50:26.160 --> 00:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>theory. What they will try to downplay for the common man when</v>

00:50:31.120 --> 00:50:35.280
<v Speaker 2>they are speaking to the laity as it were, is the random</v>

00:50:35.280 --> 00:50:42.240
<v Speaker 2>chance part because the issue is against what is natural selection acting?</v>

00:50:42.240 --> 00:50:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It's acting against mutations that arise randomly.</v>

00:50:48.800 --> 00:50:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And so all of this relies on random chance, and that's important</v>

00:50:52.960 --> 00:50:55.520
<v Speaker 2>when we get to the math in a little bit.</v>

00:50:55.520 --> 00:50:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I know we started with science and we'll get to math.</v>

00:50:58.560 --> 00:51:02.720
<v Speaker 2>It couldn't be more terrible, but it's important to have sort of</v>

00:51:02.720 --> 00:51:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a general understanding of some of this and why neo-Darwinian evolution is</v>

00:51:07.440 --> 00:51:09.440
<v Speaker 2>so utterly ridiculous.</v>

00:51:09.920 --> 00:51:16.640
<v Speaker 2>If you are relying entirely on random chance to produce the material</v>

00:51:16.640 --> 00:51:22.480
<v Speaker 2>against which natural selection can act, then the math becomes very important.</v>

00:51:23.760 --> 00:51:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Another example, not a human example, although I guess it is to</v>

00:51:28.640 --> 00:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>some degree because you have them living in you, creatures that have</v>

00:51:32.000 --> 00:51:37.600
<v Speaker 2>them, the cilia that bacteria, or flagella in that case, use to</v>

00:51:37.920 --> 00:51:40.800
<v Speaker 2>propel themselves around.</v>

00:51:40.800 --> 00:51:43.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll link to something on that, I won't go over it.</v>

00:51:43.600 --> 00:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>It's another case of an extremely complex system that interacts to the</v>

00:51:49.120 --> 00:51:53.040
<v Speaker 2>point where you cannot have any particular part of it arise by</v>

00:51:53.040 --> 00:51:55.520
<v Speaker 2>itself because it would actually be harmful.</v>

00:51:55.520 --> 00:51:59.680
<v Speaker 2>If parts of that particular system arose independently of the system they</v>

00:51:59.680 --> 00:52:01.600
<v Speaker 2>would actually tear the cell apart.</v>

00:52:01.600 --> 00:52:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Which could hardly be said to be reproductively beneficial.</v>

00:52:08.320 --> 00:52:08.560
I

00:52:08.560 --> 00:52:13.120
<v Speaker 3>think as folks are processing this episode, the the science stuff, keep</v>

00:52:13.120 --> 00:52:16.000
<v Speaker 3>in mind the recent episodes we did on the big lie and</v>

00:52:16.000 --> 00:52:20.640
<v Speaker 3>on conspiracy theories, because the principles that we demonstrated in the first</v>

00:52:20.640 --> 00:52:24.720
<v Speaker 3>one and then outlined in the second one are a play here.</v>

00:52:24.720 --> 00:52:27.520
<v Speaker 3>In the conspiracy theory episode we talked a lot about the moon</v>

00:52:27.520 --> 00:52:30.640
<v Speaker 3>landing. And so some of the examples that Corey's given and some</v>

00:52:30.800 --> 00:52:32.720
<v Speaker 3>more he's gonna give are</v>

00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:37.440
<v Speaker 3>similar in the sense that they're pot shots at</v>

00:52:38.400 --> 00:52:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the facts that are claimed by the other side, just as the</v>

00:52:42.560 --> 00:52:46.000
<v Speaker 3>ones that Owen Owen Benjamin uses for, well, how did they make</v>

00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a phone call from the moon?</v>

00:52:47.360 --> 00:52:50.240
<v Speaker 3>And what about the Van Allen belts?</v>

00:52:50.720 --> 00:52:52.960
<v Speaker 3>The distinction that we made there that I want you to keep</v>

00:52:52.960 --> 00:52:56.000
<v Speaker 3>You to keep in mind as you're listening to these things is</v>

00:52:56.000 --> 00:52:56.320
<v Speaker 3>that</v>

00:52:57.440 --> 00:53:00.400
<v Speaker 3>one, there was a very easy answer to both of those.</v>

00:53:00.400 --> 00:53:02.320
<v Speaker 3>It was a solvable problem.</v>

00:53:02.320 --> 00:53:03.920
<v Speaker 3>It was not a tricky problem.</v>

00:53:04.240 --> 00:53:08.640
<v Speaker 3>it's always easy to ask a question, but Those are questions that</v>

00:53:08.640 --> 00:53:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in the case of the moon landing, the NASA guys figured it</v>

00:53:11.760 --> 00:53:17.040
<v Speaker 3>out. They solve that problem as part of the system.</v>

00:53:17.040 --> 00:53:20.320
<v Speaker 3>So when Benjamin takes his pot shots at the moon landing, it's</v>

00:53:20.320 --> 00:53:21.760
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally disingenuous.</v>

00:53:22.000 --> 00:53:25.520
<v Speaker 3>These are also pot shots in the sense that they're easy.</v>

00:53:25.520 --> 00:53:29.440
<v Speaker 3>The difference is that just as in the episode on The Big</v>

00:53:29.440 --> 00:53:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Lie of the 20th century, if these If these things are not</v>

00:53:33.280 --> 00:53:36.320
<v Speaker 3>true, then the whole thing falls apart.</v>

00:53:36.320 --> 00:53:39.840
<v Speaker 3>So they're not pot shots in the sense that they're cheap shots,</v>

00:53:39.840 --> 00:53:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that they're they're fake.</v>

00:53:41.120 --> 00:53:45.600
<v Speaker 3>It's that they're easy because they're there's gimme.</v>

00:53:45.760 --> 00:53:46.400
<v Speaker 3>If</v>

00:53:47.680 --> 00:53:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the complexity of these systems is to be believed, they never could</v>

00:53:52.720 --> 00:53:55.840
<v Speaker 3>have evolved in place as we're told they evolved.</v>

00:53:55.840 --> 00:54:01.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's an internally inconsistent claim that falls apart when you</v>

00:54:01.120 --> 00:54:05.680
<v Speaker 3>actually examine it, you don't need to they're the ones who are</v>

00:54:05.680 --> 00:54:08.400
<v Speaker 3>effectively resorting to to faith.</v>

00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:10.880
<v Speaker 3>They're saying, well, then a miracle occurred.</v>

00:54:10.880 --> 00:54:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And they won't call it a miracle, obviously, because their whole reason</v>

00:54:13.600 --> 00:54:17.200
<v Speaker 3>for going down this path of not glorifying God by what they</v>

00:54:17.200 --> 00:54:22.800
<v Speaker 3>look at, their purpose in their scientific inquiry is denying God.</v>

00:54:22.800 --> 00:54:26.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll say given that there is no God, how then do we</v>

00:54:26.480 --> 00:54:28.080
<v Speaker 3>explain this system?</v>

00:54:28.080 --> 00:54:32.960
<v Speaker 3>As Corey's laying out, you can't you can't explain an eyeball or</v>

00:54:32.960 --> 00:54:39.200
<v Speaker 3>cilia if you cannot account for God creating it, in place as</v>

00:54:39.200 --> 00:54:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a whole functional thing.</v>

00:54:41.200 --> 00:54:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Just like Adam.</v>

00:54:42.400 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Adam was an entire man.</v>

00:54:44.320 --> 00:54:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Had all his parts in all the right places, had forty six</v>

00:54:47.360 --> 00:54:52.080
<v Speaker 3>chromosomes, all the stuff was there It wasn't finished until God said</v>

00:54:52.080 --> 00:54:52.960
<v Speaker 3>it was very good.</v>

00:54:52.960 --> 00:54:55.520
<v Speaker 3>But as God made the things, they were done.</v>

00:54:55.520 --> 00:54:58.960
<v Speaker 3>And they were conceived in God's mind.</v>

00:54:58.960 --> 00:55:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess that's how scripture says it.</v>

00:55:00.960 --> 00:55:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So we can say that.</v>

00:55:02.000 --> 00:55:02.960
<v Speaker 3>God doesn't have a mind.</v>

00:55:02.960 --> 00:55:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's another one of those irreducibility problems, except it's</v>

00:55:06.720 --> 00:55:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the infinite one.</v>

00:55:08.320 --> 00:55:10.560
<v Speaker 3>You really don't want people messing with that because when you try</v>

00:55:10.480 --> 00:55:14.880
<v Speaker 3>to introspect how God works as though he's an amoeba, you're gonna</v>

00:55:14.880 --> 00:55:17.920
<v Speaker 3>become a very splendid heretic.</v>

00:55:17.920 --> 00:55:21.520
<v Speaker 3>But even just looking at the smallest things, the arguments fall apart.</v>

00:55:21.520 --> 00:55:24.000
<v Speaker 3>So part of the reason we did this episode after the big</v>

00:55:24.000 --> 00:55:27.600
<v Speaker 3>lie and conspiracy theories is that here's an example of when you</v>

00:55:27.600 --> 00:55:33.680
<v Speaker 3>apply Proper scrutiny to the fundamentals of the claims, the claims fall</v>

00:55:33.680 --> 00:55:38.880
<v Speaker 3>apart. And that's the distinction between somebody like Benjamin saying, well, that</v>

00:55:38.880 --> 00:55:41.520
<v Speaker 3>can't have happened because of X, Y, and Z, and us saying,</v>

00:55:41.600 --> 00:55:44.240
<v Speaker 3>well, that can't have happened because of X, Y, and Z.</v>

00:55:44.240 --> 00:55:47.680
<v Speaker 3>The X, Y, and Z, if you're not thinking about it, will</v>

00:55:47.760 --> 00:55:49.760
<v Speaker 3>seem like it's, you know, just it's pot shots.</v>

00:55:49.760 --> 00:55:52.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just, well, you said this and they said that, and so</v>

00:55:52.160 --> 00:55:54.720
<v Speaker 3>what can be true?</v>

00:55:54.720 --> 00:55:59.760
<v Speaker 3>If you can clearly demonstrate that the claim itself is falsifiable, then</v>

00:55:59.760 --> 00:56:02.720
<v Speaker 3>you're left with the rest of it.</v>

00:56:02.720 --> 00:56:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And in a case of these things like these evolutionary processes so</v>

00:56:06.160 --> 00:56:09.120
<v Speaker 3>called, literally nothing is possible.</v>

00:56:09.120 --> 00:56:12.800
<v Speaker 3>If you believe what they are saying about how these things came</v>

00:56:12.800 --> 00:56:15.760
<v Speaker 3>about and you look at what we have, they couldn't have come</v>

00:56:15.760 --> 00:56:20.400
<v Speaker 3>about. So these questions are the important questions for I hate to</v>

00:56:20.400 --> 00:56:23.120
<v Speaker 3>use the word debunking, but that's really what it is.</v>

00:56:23.120 --> 00:56:28.560
<v Speaker 3>For debunking the claims of evolutionists and the claims of those who</v>

00:56:28.560 --> 00:56:33.440
<v Speaker 3>say that, well, you know, and particularly theistic evolutions, who say maybe</v>

00:56:33.440 --> 00:56:36.640
<v Speaker 3>that maybe they'll they'll put Adam on the sixth day where it</v>

00:56:36.640 --> 00:56:39.760
<v Speaker 3>ceases to be metaphorical, but then you have this long period of</v>

00:56:39.760 --> 00:56:43.200
<v Speaker 3>p time before that where other stuff was happening and then God</v>

00:56:43.200 --> 00:56:48.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of congealed mankind at the last minute and then landed it</v>

00:56:48.480 --> 00:56:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and then it became real.</v>

00:56:49.680 --> 00:56:52.160
<v Speaker 3>But before that we had amoeba and we had evolution and all</v>

00:56:52.160 --> 00:56:52.880
<v Speaker 3>this stuff.</v>

00:56:52.880 --> 00:56:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Even if you ignore the death part from the scripture intro, the</v>

00:56:57.040 --> 00:56:58.240
<v Speaker 3>math still doesn't work.</v>

00:56:58.240 --> 00:57:01.600
<v Speaker 3>The f the physics and the chemistry still doesn't work.</v>

00:57:01.600 --> 00:57:07.200
<v Speaker 3>The biology itself is literally impossible in their own system.</v>

00:57:07.200 --> 00:57:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So I just wanted to point out that those episodes previously dealing</v>

00:57:10.720 --> 00:57:14.640
<v Speaker 3>with weighing evidence are they're a crucial part of just being good</v>

00:57:14.640 --> 00:57:15.520
<v Speaker 3>at thinking.</v>

00:57:15.520 --> 00:57:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Like one of the overarching themes of Stone Choir, apart from the</v>

00:57:18.880 --> 00:57:22.560
<v Speaker 3>theology stuff, is we hope that anyone who's listening will get better</v>

00:57:22.560 --> 00:57:23.520
<v Speaker 3>at thinking.</v>

00:57:23.520 --> 00:57:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Because you don't have to be smart to be careful.</v>

00:57:26.240 --> 00:57:29.120
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to be smart to do a good job and</v>

00:57:29.120 --> 00:57:30.880
<v Speaker 3>not being hoodwinked.</v>

00:57:30.880 --> 00:57:33.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, Cory, like I said, Cory knows a whole lot more</v>

00:57:33.600 --> 00:57:34.960
<v Speaker 3>about the science than I do.</v>

00:57:34.960 --> 00:57:38.160
<v Speaker 3>He could probably trick me, but I at least know enough that</v>

00:57:38.480 --> 00:57:40.880
<v Speaker 3>he would have to be doing a really good job.</v>

00:57:40.880 --> 00:57:44.320
<v Speaker 3>And so whether it's him or it's someone else, you know, there</v>

00:57:44.320 --> 00:57:47.120
<v Speaker 3>was there was a post that came up a couple months ago</v>

00:57:47.120 --> 00:57:54.320
<v Speaker 3>on Reddit where someone was making an anonymous claim about biological aliens.</v>

00:57:54.320 --> 00:57:56.080
<v Speaker 3>And I read it and it checked out.</v>

00:57:56.080 --> 00:58:01.040
<v Speaker 3>It's consistent with my beliefs about so-called aliens, that they're demonic, that</v>

00:58:01.040 --> 00:58:08.400
<v Speaker 3>they're real physical manifestations using created material for for evil for demonic</v>

00:58:08.400 --> 00:58:11.120
<v Speaker 3>purposes. And so I I sent that to someone who has a</v>

00:58:11.120 --> 00:58:14.960
<v Speaker 3>PhD in this stuff and said, I my smell test passes with</v>

00:58:14.960 --> 00:58:18.080
<v Speaker 3>this. I can't see anything obviously wrong with it, but I know</v>

00:58:18.080 --> 00:58:20.320
<v Speaker 3>that I could be tricked because I'm I'm not that knowledgeable about</v>

00:58:20.320 --> 00:58:22.720
<v Speaker 3>it. And so I asked someone who knew whole knew a whole</v>

00:58:22.720 --> 00:58:25.600
<v Speaker 3>lot more about the specific claims in the article.</v>

00:58:25.600 --> 00:58:27.440
<v Speaker 3>And he said, yeah, it basically makes sense.</v>

00:58:27.440 --> 00:58:30.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's good to have someone you can refer to to help</v>

00:58:30.400 --> 00:58:34.240
<v Speaker 3>you with smell tests, but even if at a basic level, just</v>

00:58:34.240 --> 00:58:38.960
<v Speaker 3>being careful about thinking and analyzing things can give you the foundation</v>

00:58:38.960 --> 00:58:41.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's going to be a lot harder for you to fall</v>

00:58:41.680 --> 00:58:43.760
<v Speaker 3>for stuff that's plainly dumb.</v>

00:58:43.760 --> 00:58:46.240
<v Speaker 3>And so the things we're going to go over, although the the</v>

00:58:46.560 --> 00:58:50.560
<v Speaker 3>scientific inquiries are complex, we'll we'll link to some of the papers</v>

00:58:50.560 --> 00:58:53.360
<v Speaker 3>and some videos that go into a ton of detail on this</v>

00:58:53.360 --> 00:58:55.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff. And if you're excited about that, cool.</v>

00:58:55.680 --> 00:58:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Like it I don't find that interesting because I don't worry about</v>

00:58:58.320 --> 00:59:01.680
<v Speaker 3>it. But if it's something that worries you, I would say go</v>

00:59:01.680 --> 00:59:02.800
<v Speaker 3>look at the data.</v>

00:59:02.800 --> 00:59:07.040
<v Speaker 3>But I would also say if you're worried that the evidence is</v>

00:59:07.040 --> 00:59:11.200
<v Speaker 3>going to invalidate scripture, then it doesn't matter what evidence you find</v>

00:59:11.200 --> 00:59:13.280
<v Speaker 3>because you have a spiritual problem first.</v>

00:59:13.280 --> 00:59:16.880
<v Speaker 3>You have a spiritual problem of not believing believing scripture, even when</v>

00:59:16.880 --> 00:59:19.520
<v Speaker 3>it's in a ration irrational, because sometimes it is.</v>

00:59:19.520 --> 00:59:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, miracles are irrational to say that God did something that's</v>

00:59:23.120 --> 00:59:23.840
<v Speaker 3>outside the bounds of</v>

00:59:24.880 --> 00:59:27.360
<v Speaker 3>material creation is irrational.</v>

00:59:27.920 --> 00:59:31.680
<v Speaker 3>It's reason cannot explain the things why we call it a miracle.</v>

00:59:31.680 --> 00:59:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Something also is in episode six.</v>

00:59:33.840 --> 00:59:37.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's okay for there to be miracles, and that's another reason</v>

00:59:37.120 --> 00:59:41.120
<v Speaker 3>why this episode is important, because there are miracles.</v>

00:59:41.120 --> 00:59:46.640
<v Speaker 3>God does creative impossible things that are not impossible for him because</v>

00:59:46.640 --> 00:59:47.440
<v Speaker 3>he's God.</v>

00:59:47.440 --> 00:59:51.280
<v Speaker 3>They're impossible for us to explain in some cases, particularly when we</v>

00:59:51.280 --> 00:59:54.320
<v Speaker 3>try to make up fairy tales like some of this stuff.</v>

00:59:54.320 --> 00:59:59.280
<v Speaker 3>And so these attacks on the six days of creation, not only</v>

00:59:59.280 --> 01:00:04.800
<v Speaker 3>is it an attack on original sin and an attack on Christ's</v>

01:00:04.800 --> 01:00:07.680
<v Speaker 3>redeeming work in the world.</v>

01:00:07.680 --> 01:00:11.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's also just an attack on the supernatural, on whether or</v>

01:00:11.600 --> 01:00:13.440
<v Speaker 3>not God can do these things.</v>

01:00:13.440 --> 01:00:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Forget for a moment, did He the fundamental denial of someone who's</v>

01:00:18.240 --> 01:00:23.360
<v Speaker 3>concerned that unless I see the fact I can believe the Bible,</v>

01:00:23.360 --> 01:00:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that's not a question of did he.</v>

01:00:25.280 --> 01:00:27.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a question of can he?</v>

01:00:27.120 --> 01:00:30.480
<v Speaker 3>And if you believe that God can't do something, then we're not</v>

01:00:30.480 --> 01:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>talking about the same God because the God that we as Christians</v>

01:00:34.640 --> 01:00:36.800
<v Speaker 3>hold to is infinite.</v>

01:00:36.800 --> 01:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>He's omnipotent.</v>

01:00:38.640 --> 01:00:39.600
<v Speaker 3>he knows everything.</v>

01:00:39.600 --> 01:00:40.880
<v Speaker 3>He can do anything.</v>

01:00:40.880 --> 01:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Nothing is beyond his ability.</v>

01:00:43.360 --> 01:00:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that's literally the definition of God.</v>

01:00:45.120 --> 01:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Like it's it's another one of those systems where when you start</v>

01:00:47.840 --> 01:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>looking at the definitions, they describe the thing inextricably.</v>

01:00:50.960 --> 01:00:54.240
<v Speaker 3>There's no way to remove or subtract or or it's all ha</v>

01:00:54.320 --> 01:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it all has to fit together, just like these tiny examples.</v>

01:00:57.680 --> 01:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think frankly, that's to me, I see that also as</v>

01:01:01.120 --> 01:01:03.440
<v Speaker 3>evidence of the existence of God.</v>

01:01:03.440 --> 01:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>That from the smallest to the largest, you know, whether you're looking</v>

01:01:06.240 --> 01:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>at the structure of an atom or the structure of a galaxy,</v>

01:01:09.920 --> 01:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>they're shaped the same way.</v>

01:01:11.440 --> 01:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>You got something really heavy and big in the middle, and you</v>

01:01:14.240 --> 01:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>have a cloud of stuff circling around it.</v>

01:01:16.560 --> 01:01:19.680
<v Speaker 3>God loves these patterns and they play out over and over in</v>

01:01:19.680 --> 01:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>creation. Why?</v>

01:01:21.120 --> 01:01:23.120
<v Speaker 3>'Cause it's what he wanted to do.</v>

01:01:23.120 --> 01:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>We just we're along for the ride and it's how everything works</v>

01:01:25.760 --> 01:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and we should enjoy it.</v>

01:01:27.360 --> 01:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you're trying to figure stuff out, that's good.</v>

01:01:30.800 --> 01:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>It's important to try to figure stuff out.</v>

01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Just be clear that if you're looking at evidence and weighing it</v>

01:01:37.520 --> 01:01:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to judge scripture, you've got it backwards.</v>

01:01:40.560 --> 01:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>When we do these subjects about science and things like that, we</v>

01:01:43.760 --> 01:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>never want to give the impression that we are subjecting scripture to</v>

01:01:48.320 --> 01:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>our own reason or our own senses.</v>

01:01:50.640 --> 01:01:52.640
<v Speaker 3>That's never the point we want to make.</v>

01:01:52.640 --> 01:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>We want to make that having believed in what scripture says as</v>

01:01:56.400 --> 01:01:59.200
<v Speaker 3>best we possibly can, with absolute faith to the best of the</v>

01:01:59.200 --> 01:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>ability God's given us, then what?</v>

01:02:02.560 --> 01:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Then we look at these things and it turns out that as</v>

01:02:05.520 --> 01:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I said earlier, believing that God did this stuff is actually the</v>

01:02:08.880 --> 01:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>easiest sell of all.</v>

01:02:10.160 --> 01:02:14.320
<v Speaker 3>It's far easier than believing the theories that are presented to explain</v>

01:02:14.320 --> 01:02:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the world without God.</v>

01:02:16.960 --> 01:02:22.240
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned tricking people, and that's actually exactly the point that I</v>

01:02:22.240 --> 01:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>have here as my next item on this list as it were.</v>

01:02:27.200 --> 01:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Evolutionists play fast and loose when it comes to three distinct</v>

01:02:34.560 --> 01:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>concepts. These are all evolutionary concepts in the broader sense of the</v>

01:02:40.080 --> 01:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>term evolution, not just in the biological sense, because you have evolution</v>

01:02:46.080 --> 01:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of, say, the pencil over time as it is refined in terms</v>

01:02:50.160 --> 01:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of its design.</v>

01:02:52.640 --> 01:02:59.760
<v Speaker 2>But the three distinct concepts are morphological evolution, conceptual evolution, and biochemical</v>

01:02:59.760 --> 01:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>evolution, the last one being the most properly biological of all of</v>

01:03:04.480 --> 01:03:06.640
<v Speaker 2>them, although morphological is also</v>

01:03:07.760 --> 01:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>biological in this sense.</v>

01:03:09.680 --> 01:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But the issue here is that</v>

01:03:13.120 --> 01:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>scientists, evolutionists, particularly science apologists, so called, will either deliberately or carelessly</v>

01:03:20.480 --> 01:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>conflate these, and they are not identical, they are quite distinct.</v>

01:03:26.720 --> 01:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>To give some examples to make this easier to understand, a bicycle</v>

01:03:34.160 --> 01:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>is morphologically the predecessor of the motorcycle.</v>

01:03:39.840 --> 01:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It is also conceptually the predecessor.</v>

01:03:42.640 --> 01:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>It is not biochemically the predecessor.</v>

01:03:44.480 --> 01:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>We're dealing with mechanical systems here, non-biological mechanical systems, because of course</v>

01:03:50.080 --> 01:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>there are biological mechanical systems.</v>

01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>You are, to some degree, a series of biological machines.</v>

01:03:58.800 --> 01:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>But morphologically is just simply speaking in terms of form, using the</v>

01:04:04.160 --> 01:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Greek there.</v>

01:04:05.520 --> 01:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>And so you have something that is, with regard to its form,</v>

01:04:11.520 --> 01:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the antecedent of something else.</v>

01:04:14.400 --> 01:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>And so that would be the case with various kinds of transport.</v>

01:04:17.920 --> 01:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You can go from the bicycle to the motorcycle or from the</v>

01:04:22.560 --> 01:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>bicycle to the car, these are similar in form to some degree.</v>

01:04:29.040 --> 01:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>They are also similar to some degree in concept.</v>

01:04:32.480 --> 01:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>They are forms of transportation using wheels to get you from point</v>

01:04:36.880 --> 01:04:38.720
<v Speaker 2>A to point B.</v>

01:04:38.720 --> 01:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, conceptually, if we expand the concept, a bicycle can be the</v>

01:04:44.400 --> 01:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>conceptual antecedent of an airplane.</v>

01:04:46.960 --> 01:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>It is It is not the morphological antecedent of an airplane, most</v>

01:04:50.480 --> 01:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>certainly, and biochemical we've left aside because it's not even involved in</v>

01:04:55.120 --> 01:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>this realm at this point.</v>

01:04:57.680 --> 01:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>But when it comes to biology, this becomes a major problem for</v>

01:05:02.560 --> 01:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the evolutionist, because you can say that the eye spot on some</v>

01:05:08.320 --> 01:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>simple relatively speaking creature is perhaps the conceptual antecedent of the</v>

01:05:15.520 --> 01:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>mammalian eye, but it is most certainly not the biochemical antecedent, and</v>

01:05:20.960 --> 01:05:23.440
<v Speaker 2>so it is not an argument for evolution.</v>

01:05:23.440 --> 01:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>The evolutionist is looking at it as an intelligent being from the</v>

01:05:26.960 --> 01:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>outside and saying this is conceptually related to this, well that's actually</v>

01:05:31.440 --> 01:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>proof of a creator of an intelligence relating concepts.</v>

01:05:35.680 --> 01:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>They'll never admit that.</v>

01:05:37.600 --> 01:05:43.440
<v Speaker 2>But giving that there is not that biochemical relationship, you cannot say</v>

01:05:43.760 --> 01:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>that the one is evolutionarily the antecedent of the other.</v>

01:05:48.560 --> 01:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And so it's important to be careful when someone brings up these</v>

01:05:51.360 --> 01:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>arguments to identify</v>

01:05:53.440 --> 01:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>which one of these kinds of evolution is in play.</v>

01:05:57.520 --> 01:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Because evolutionists have to prove morphological and biochemical.</v>

01:06:02.240 --> 01:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>They don't have to prove conceptual, although conceptual is a problem for</v>

01:06:05.440 --> 01:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>them because if you prove conceptual, you're really proving there's intelligence involved</v>

01:06:09.440 --> 01:06:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in some way.</v>

01:06:11.600 --> 01:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>But they'll play fast and loose because they expect you not to</v>

01:06:14.960 --> 01:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>pay close enough attention and just say okay, well, an eye spot</v>

01:06:18.800 --> 01:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>detects photons and so it must be the antecedent of the eye.</v>

01:06:22.640 --> 01:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.</v>

01:06:24.480 --> 01:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>They are biochemically distinct and you cannot get from one to the</v>

01:06:27.920 --> 01:06:31.040
<v Speaker 2>other using the systems of the one, in this case, the eye</v>

01:06:31.200 --> 01:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>spot</v>

01:06:32.320 --> 01:06:33.920
<v Speaker 2>getting to the eye.</v>

01:06:33.920 --> 01:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>And so it is not proof for evolution.</v>

01:06:38.320 --> 01:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>But before we get into really the last part of this episode,</v>

01:06:42.560 --> 01:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>which would be the philosophical issues, and I don't know if we'll</v>

01:06:45.920 --> 01:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>go over all of them.</v>

01:06:46.720 --> 01:06:49.280
<v Speaker 2>The episode might run a little long if we do that.</v>

01:06:49.280 --> 01:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>There are a few major problems I want to highlight before we</v>

01:06:53.360 --> 01:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>move on.</v>

01:06:54.560 --> 01:06:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I've touched on a couple of them to some degree.</v>

01:06:57.520 --> 01:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I touched on the issue of abiogenesis, how do you explain that</v>

01:07:02.080 --> 01:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>we have life?</v>

01:07:03.360 --> 01:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>How did it arise from non life?</v>

01:07:05.520 --> 01:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>That's the issue of abiogenesis.</v>

01:07:07.440 --> 01:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>There's no answer.</v>

01:07:09.760 --> 01:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in the scientific literature.</v>

01:07:12.960 --> 01:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>You may have heard of an experiment back in the nineteen fifties,</v>

01:07:17.840 --> 01:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>in which some scientists set up a supposedly primordial soup that that</v>

01:07:23.840 --> 01:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>was theoretically the conditions of some primordial earth, and then passed a</v>

01:07:30.480 --> 01:07:35.040
<v Speaker 2>very high voltage through it, and wound up with some precursors to</v>

01:07:35.040 --> 01:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>certain chemicals that are necessary for life.</v>

01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's possible they did that.</v>

01:07:40.720 --> 01:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>There has been absolutely no progress in seventy years on that front.</v>

01:07:45.360 --> 01:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>They have not been able to make any progress toward creating more</v>

01:07:49.840 --> 01:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>complex materials, molecules, etc needed for life.</v>

01:07:55.040 --> 01:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's with the application of intelligence, which is of course a</v>

01:07:59.200 --> 01:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>fundamental problem with all of these experiments.</v>

01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>They all run afoul, necessarily, of the very sort of strictures that</v>

01:08:08.480 --> 01:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>should be in place for any experiment designed to prove evolution.</v>

01:08:13.440 --> 01:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Because all of them have intelligent input.</v>

01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>If you're saying that an intelligence can create conditions and then apply</v>

01:08:23.200 --> 01:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>energy or what have you, some outside factor to a system and</v>

01:08:27.040 --> 01:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>create life, you haven't proved evolution.</v>

01:08:30.080 --> 01:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>You've proved intelligent design.</v>

01:08:33.280 --> 01:08:36.720
<v Speaker 2>The only way you could prove evolution is if you were to</v>

01:08:36.720 --> 01:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>find some sort of primordial planet out there that approximates Earth, and</v>

01:08:42.080 --> 01:08:44.960
<v Speaker 2>then watch it for millions of years.</v>

01:08:44.960 --> 01:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>If life arises, okay fine.</v>

01:08:47.040 --> 01:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Evolution is true.</v>

01:08:48.560 --> 01:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>You have to make sure that you didn't have life arise on</v>

01:08:51.120 --> 01:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the planet because you contaminated the planet.</v>

01:08:54.080 --> 01:08:55.280
<v Speaker 2>But that's the only way to do it.</v>

01:08:55.280 --> 01:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>If you are setting up an experiment as an intelligent actor, you</v>

01:08:58.960 --> 01:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>have already violated what is necessary as preconditions to prove your conclusion.</v>

01:09:04.480 --> 01:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>You've defeated yourself before you started.</v>

01:09:10.560 --> 01:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>The other issue, one of the other issues of the four, is</v>

01:09:13.920 --> 01:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>chirality. This sort of adds a level of complexity to the biochemistry.</v>

01:09:20.400 --> 01:09:20.720
<v Speaker 2>And</v>

01:09:23.040 --> 01:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>two things, or a thing in two forms, is chiral if it</v>

01:09:27.280 --> 01:09:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is asymmetric in such a way that the structure and its mirror</v>

01:09:31.440 --> 01:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>image are not superimposable.</v>

01:09:34.720 --> 01:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>That sounds complicated, but stick your hands in front of your face</v>

01:09:38.400 --> 01:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and look at them.</v>

01:09:39.200 --> 01:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Your hands are chiral.</v>

01:09:41.120 --> 01:09:44.400
<v Speaker 2>And you know this because you've probably accidentally tried to put on</v>

01:09:44.400 --> 01:09:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the wrong glove at some point.</v>

01:09:46.720 --> 01:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>You cannot, no matter how you orient it, put on the left</v>

01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>glove on the right hand, or vice versa.</v>

01:09:53.840 --> 01:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Because your hands are chiral.</v>

01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>They're not superimposable.</v>

01:09:57.280 --> 01:09:59.840
<v Speaker 2>You can't just reorient the one to be the other.</v>

01:09:59.840 --> 01:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's why your gloves are handed.</v>

01:10:02.080 --> 01:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>They do not fit on the wrong hand.</v>

01:10:06.560 --> 01:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Many molecules, many of the building blocks of life, including amino acids,</v>

01:10:13.440 --> 01:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>are chiral.</v>

01:10:15.360 --> 01:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Now there are about five hundred some amino acids, but really the</v>

01:10:19.120 --> 01:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>relevant ones are the alpha amino acids, of which there are twenty</v>

01:10:22.320 --> 01:10:24.480
<v Speaker 2>two, twenty naturally occurring.</v>

01:10:24.480 --> 01:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>These are the ones that form proteins.</v>

01:10:26.240 --> 01:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>These are obviously very important for life.</v>

01:10:28.560 --> 01:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen out of twenty of them are L chiral, which is to</v>

01:10:31.920 --> 01:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>say left handed.</v>

01:10:33.360 --> 01:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>You cannot use the other.</v>

01:10:36.240 --> 01:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>You cannot make use of the right-handed version.</v>

01:10:38.880 --> 01:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it's going to cause problems in many cases.</v>

01:10:42.080 --> 01:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>This is also relevant in the pharmaceutical industry, because, believe it or</v>

01:10:48.320 --> 01:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>not, drugs, many of them, are handed.</v>

01:10:51.760 --> 01:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>The molecules in them are handed.</v>

01:10:53.520 --> 01:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>They are either left handed or right handed, and if you use</v>

01:10:57.920 --> 01:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the wrong version, it may very well kill you instead of help</v>

01:11:01.600 --> 01:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you. That is how important chirality can be.</v>

01:11:04.720 --> 01:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>The same is true of the naturally occurring compounds, the wrong one</v>

01:11:08.160 --> 01:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>may very well destroy the cell.</v>

01:11:11.040 --> 01:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>And so this is just an additional layer of complexity, and leading</v>

01:11:15.520 --> 01:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>into my next point, an additional problem with probability, because it significantly</v>

01:11:20.400 --> 01:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>decreases the probability of creating the molecule you want by chance anyway.</v>

01:11:25.920 --> 01:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>If you have an intelligently designed system, it does it by design.</v>

01:11:29.120 --> 01:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>If you have a randomly designed, as it were, system, well it</v>

01:11:33.360 --> 01:11:36.480
<v Speaker 2>has to do it according to probability, and the probabilities here simply</v>

01:11:36.480 --> 01:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>don't work.</v>

01:11:37.360 --> 01:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll get into more of the specifics in the philosophical section section</v>

01:11:40.880 --> 01:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of the episode.</v>

01:11:43.520 --> 01:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But even given the immense amount of time that fine, I am</v>

01:11:48.960 --> 01:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>willing to grant to the evolutionist that the universe is billions of</v>

01:11:52.480 --> 01:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>years old.</v>

01:11:53.200 --> 01:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I also believe it's six thousand years old.</v>

01:11:55.200 --> 01:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I have an article on that, I will put it in the</v>

01:11:57.200 --> 01:11:58.240
<v Speaker 2>show notes.</v>

01:11:58.240 --> 01:12:01.200
<v Speaker 2>But even if you take the billions of years old and give</v>

01:12:01.200 --> 01:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>them that time in order for life to evolve, well you can't</v>

01:12:05.760 --> 01:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>actually give them the eleven or twelve or thirteen or however many</v>

01:12:09.120 --> 01:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>billions of years they want.</v>

01:12:10.080 --> 01:12:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Give them fifty, I don't care.</v>

01:12:11.680 --> 01:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You can't give them that because you have the age of the</v>

01:12:13.840 --> 01:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Earth, which is four and a half billion supposedly, even if you</v>

01:12:17.840 --> 01:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>don't subtract the time from them for the Earth cooling from the</v>

01:12:21.840 --> 01:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>molten phase according to their cosmology.</v>

01:12:25.280 --> 01:12:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Even if you give them four and a half billion, it doesn't</v>

01:12:28.880 --> 01:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>work. The probability does not play out, there's not enough time.</v>

01:12:32.240 --> 01:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of reasons for that, some of them are</v>

01:12:34.320 --> 01:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>very complicated.</v>

01:12:35.040 --> 01:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll give a couple examples that are very easy to understand in</v>

01:12:39.280 --> 01:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the philosophical section.</v>

01:12:41.600 --> 01:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>But the final of the four major problems that I want to</v>

01:12:44.320 --> 01:12:47.440
<v Speaker 2>highlight before moving on is the information problem.</v>

01:12:47.760 --> 01:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the easy information problem.</v>

01:12:49.680 --> 01:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>There's also a hard one, which is in the next section.</v>

01:12:53.440 --> 01:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>The easy information problem, very simple to understand, but truly insurmountable, to</v>

01:12:59.680 --> 01:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>date, for the evolutionist.</v>

01:13:02.560 --> 01:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Within a biological system, no evidence has ever been presented of the</v>

01:13:07.360 --> 01:13:10.960
<v Speaker 2>creation of novel to that system information</v>

01:13:13.440 --> 01:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Now you may think, how can that possibly be true?</v>

01:13:16.480 --> 01:13:18.560
<v Speaker 2>We have Darwin's finches.</v>

01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>We won't get into some of the funnier bits of Darwin's finches,</v>

01:13:21.600 --> 01:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>he mislabeled things and lost specimens, but other than that.</v>

01:13:26.720 --> 01:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>That does not prove the creation of novel information, because that did</v>

01:13:31.760 --> 01:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>not happen according to the creation of novel information.</v>

01:13:35.120 --> 01:13:38.640
<v Speaker 2>You're probably more familiar with dog breeds than you are with the</v>

01:13:38.640 --> 01:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>various subspecies of finch or what have you.</v>

01:13:42.880 --> 01:13:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Dog breeds are created through selective breeding that results in the loss</v>

01:13:49.120 --> 01:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of information.</v>

01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>A Pomeranian has less genetic information than whatever the original ancestor, dog,</v>

01:13:58.960 --> 01:14:01.280
<v Speaker 2>or wolf was.</v>

01:14:01.280 --> 01:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>From the original ancestor, the one that came off Noah's Ark, you</v>

01:14:05.360 --> 01:14:09.680
<v Speaker 2>could arrive at all of the current species through the selective loss</v>

01:14:09.680 --> 01:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of information over successive generations.</v>

01:14:13.200 --> 01:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You cannot get back to that original dog, that original canid, from</v>

01:14:18.720 --> 01:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>what we have today, because the information has been lost.</v>

01:14:24.080 --> 01:14:27.920
<v Speaker 2>That is what we have been able to demonstrate, through experiments and</v>

01:14:27.920 --> 01:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>just through breeding animals.</v>

01:14:30.320 --> 01:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>If you lose information selectively, you can create subspecies.</v>

01:14:35.680 --> 01:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what happened with human beings.</v>

01:14:38.400 --> 01:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Through the selective loss of information, we went from what was present</v>

01:14:44.240 --> 01:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>in</v>

01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>depending how far back you want to go, Adam or the sons</v>

01:14:48.960 --> 01:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>of Noah, to the various nations we see today.</v>

01:14:52.240 --> 01:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>You cannot get back to them from us.</v>

01:14:54.480 --> 01:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>The information has been lost.</v>

01:14:57.760 --> 01:15:03.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a fundamental problem for the evolutionist because evolution necessitates it</v>

01:15:03.520 --> 01:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>relies upon the ability to create novel information that has not been</v>

01:15:08.400 --> 01:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>demonstrated, and if you cannot demonstrate that, then evolution is necessarily false.</v>

01:15:16.720 --> 01:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>This leads into the philosophical section and the hard information problem.</v>

01:15:22.880 --> 01:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>The hard information problem is simply this.</v>

01:15:26.240 --> 01:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Information can neither be created nor destroyed.</v>

01:15:30.480 --> 01:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Now I said information can be lost, that's a different thing.</v>

01:15:33.360 --> 01:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>You can lose information from a system.</v>

01:15:35.680 --> 01:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>The information's still</v>

01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>exists in sort of a grand sense.</v>

01:15:41.840 --> 01:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>The information itself is not destroyed.</v>

01:15:44.480 --> 01:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>This gets into the difference between instance and form and the mind</v>

01:15:48.080 --> 01:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of God.</v>

01:15:48.480 --> 01:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>We won't get into that.</v>

01:15:49.280 --> 01:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>It's constant, that's maybe for another episode.</v>

01:15:52.880 --> 01:15:56.800
<v Speaker 2>But the fundamental point is simply that information can neither be created</v>

01:15:56.800 --> 01:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>nor destroyed.</v>

01:15:57.760 --> 01:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>This is a hard information problem philosophically for the evolutionist.</v>

01:16:02.640 --> 01:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Because again, evolution relies on the creation of novel information at least</v>

01:16:07.520 --> 01:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>within a given biological system, and that has not been demonstrated to</v>

01:16:11.120 --> 01:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>happen as I mentioned before.</v>

01:16:13.520 --> 01:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, surely someone listening, at some point, or someone who has sent</v>

01:16:16.640 --> 01:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a clip of this episode, what have you, is going to say</v>

01:16:20.080 --> 01:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>aha black holes.</v>

01:16:22.720 --> 01:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>They destroy information, and so information can be destroyed.</v>

01:16:27.440 --> 01:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Two problems with that.</v>

01:16:30.240 --> 01:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>One, we don't know that black holes destroy information, there's the issue</v>

01:16:35.280 --> 01:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of Hawking radiation and various other things.</v>

01:16:37.920 --> 01:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>But two, and more saliently, the person raising this objection is undoubtedly</v>

01:16:42.640 --> 01:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be the I love science type.</v>

01:16:47.040 --> 01:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Beyond the event horizon, nothing is knowable, according to the best of</v>

01:16:51.760 --> 01:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>our current science and certainly the best of our current technology.</v>

01:16:55.520 --> 01:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>And so anything beyond the event horizon is purely conjecture.</v>

01:17:00.720 --> 01:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Therefore, it is not falsifiable, therefore, it is not per the terms</v>

01:17:04.800 --> 01:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>set by the scientific community itself science.</v>

01:17:08.160 --> 01:17:09.920
<v Speaker 2>It is conjecture.</v>

01:17:09.920 --> 01:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>It is no more compelling, in a hard sense, than fiction.</v>

01:17:16.720 --> 01:17:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And so</v>

01:17:18.560 --> 01:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>again, I would highlight that adaptation is driven by loss, and this</v>

01:17:22.720 --> 01:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>is another facet of this information problem, because the information drops out</v>

01:17:27.280 --> 01:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>of the system, it's not destroyed, it is simply no longer available</v>

01:17:30.880 --> 01:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to that biological</v>

01:17:32.400 --> 01:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>system.</v>

01:17:34.320 --> 01:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>The next philosophical issue that I would raise is this a relatively</v>

01:17:39.200 --> 01:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>simple one, very easy to understand this one, get a firm grasp</v>

01:17:42.800 --> 01:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of it, but it is absolutely fatal to the evolutionist.</v>

01:17:47.280 --> 01:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>And that is the difference between analog and digital information.</v>

01:17:52.480 --> 01:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Analog information is what it is because it is what it is.</v>

01:17:58.320 --> 01:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Digital information is what it is because some intelligence defined it to</v>

01:18:04.160 --> 01:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>be that.</v>

01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a fundamental distinction.</v>

01:18:09.040 --> 01:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>So if we use the most basic example, pick up any physical</v>

01:18:12.960 --> 01:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>object, it is what it is because it is what it is.</v>

01:18:16.400 --> 01:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>There's information there, in the broad sense of information.</v>

01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>That's analog information.</v>

01:18:23.040 --> 01:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Digital is something entirely different.</v>

01:18:24.720 --> 01:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>So the pen I'm holding is a pen, analog information, it's a</v>

01:18:28.400 --> 01:18:31.120
<v Speaker 2>pen because it's a pen.</v>

01:18:31.120 --> 01:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>The word pen</v>

01:18:33.040 --> 01:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>is digital.</v>

01:18:34.320 --> 01:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>The word pen means this thing that I am holding.</v>

01:18:38.560 --> 01:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>It references really the form, the concept of a pen, but it</v>

01:18:42.240 --> 01:18:45.440
<v Speaker 2>also references the specific instance that I do have in my hand</v>

01:18:45.440 --> 01:18:46.160
<v Speaker 2>right now.</v>

01:18:46.160 --> 01:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>That is digital information.</v>

01:18:48.240 --> 01:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>The letters PEN</v>

01:18:50.640 --> 01:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>reference pen because we as human beings have defined it to do</v>

01:18:55.600 --> 01:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>so. An intelligence is required for digital information to have meaning.</v>

01:19:02.560 --> 01:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Digital information does not mean what it means because it inherently means</v>

01:19:08.480 --> 01:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>that. DNA is digital, because DNA is a language.</v>

01:19:15.280 --> 01:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>It is a language based</v>

01:19:17.280 --> 01:19:19.920
<v Speaker 2>on AGTC.</v>

01:19:19.920 --> 01:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Or if you're talking about RNA instead, AGUC, Uracil instead of thymine.</v>

01:19:25.760 --> 01:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>It is based on these base pairs, which are used to construct</v>

01:19:31.200 --> 01:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the human and animal genomes, pretty much life on Earth.</v>

01:19:38.560 --> 01:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>If DNA is digital, which it in fact is, then you need</v>

01:19:42.240 --> 01:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>an intelligence to have defined what these mean, why they mean that.</v>

01:19:49.040 --> 01:19:53.360
<v Speaker 2>PEN means pen, because humans define that.</v>

01:19:53.360 --> 01:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>DNA means human being in the case of our genome because God</v>

01:19:58.320 --> 01:20:00.400
<v Speaker 2>defined that.</v>

01:20:00.400 --> 01:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a fundamental problem for the evolutionist.</v>

01:20:03.760 --> 01:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>You do not have analog information contained in the genome.</v>

01:20:08.240 --> 01:20:10.880
<v Speaker 2>You have digital information stored there.</v>

01:20:10.880 --> 01:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And that is why there is so much information stored in the</v>

01:20:14.080 --> 01:20:17.120
<v Speaker 2>human and other genomes.</v>

01:20:17.120 --> 01:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Because it's digital.</v>

01:20:20.080 --> 01:20:24.560
<v Speaker 2>And this leads into my next point.</v>

01:20:24.560 --> 01:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Many will say that there's a system or something in the world</v>

01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that has the appearance of design</v>

01:20:32.080 --> 01:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is a misnomer.</v>

01:20:34.560 --> 01:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Now we do use it in a way that is fair, I</v>

01:20:38.720 --> 01:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>will say.</v>

01:20:40.320 --> 01:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>If you were to throw a bunch of marbles on the floor,</v>

01:20:43.760 --> 01:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and they formed what appeared to be a pattern, that is, to</v>

01:20:47.040 --> 01:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>some degree, the appearance of design.</v>

01:20:51.840 --> 01:20:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But there is also design in play.</v>

01:20:54.400 --> 01:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>And there is design in play, because all of those systems that</v>

01:20:58.400 --> 01:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>contributed to that appearance of design, that appearance of a pattern, were</v>

01:21:03.280 --> 01:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>in fact themselves designed.</v>

01:21:06.560 --> 01:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Gravity is a constant set by God.</v>

01:21:09.280 --> 01:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>The density of the marbles is a thing set by God, the</v>

01:21:12.800 --> 01:21:16.640
<v Speaker 2>way these interact, the way that kinetic forces interplay, all of these</v>

01:21:16.640 --> 01:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>various things are design, and so the result is the result of</v>

01:21:21.280 --> 01:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>design. And so we do a disservice to ourselves when we say</v>

01:21:25.600 --> 01:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that something has the appearance of design and don't really think about</v>

01:21:28.560 --> 01:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>what it is we're saying.</v>

01:21:30.320 --> 01:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>It on a superficial level has the appearance of design, but on</v>

01:21:34.080 --> 01:21:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a fundamental level, it is still the result of design.</v>

01:21:39.120 --> 01:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a game that evolutionists play.</v>

01:21:41.040 --> 01:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>They'll try to say that something has the appearance of design, and</v>

01:21:43.760 --> 01:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>they'll use this to gloss over all sorts of things that very</v>

01:21:47.200 --> 01:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>clearly do not have the appearance of design, but have the reality</v>

01:21:51.040 --> 01:21:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of design.</v>

01:21:52.880 --> 01:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So we could go back to the vision system or blood clotting</v>

01:21:57.040 --> 01:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>or neurochemistry or any of a thousand different things.</v>

01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:06.880
<v Speaker 2>These are designed, very obviously designed, and they want you to disbelieve</v>

01:22:06.880 --> 01:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>your lying eyes, as it were.</v>

01:22:09.360 --> 01:22:12.640
<v Speaker 2>They want to tell you that well, obviously it looks like it</v>

01:22:12.640 --> 01:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>was designed, but you can't possibly believe that because it can't be</v>

01:22:15.520 --> 01:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>designed</v>

01:22:16.960 --> 01:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll get into that point in a little bit here.</v>

01:22:21.520 --> 01:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>But just be careful when someone is using this appearance of design</v>

01:22:25.760 --> 01:22:31.680
<v Speaker 2>argument. Most likely the person, if it's related to biochemistry, related to</v>

01:22:31.680 --> 01:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>biology evolution, is attempting to mislead you, is attempting to hand wave</v>

01:22:36.320 --> 01:22:41.120
<v Speaker 2>away something that very clearly has design, not just the appearance of</v>

01:22:41.120 --> 01:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>design.</v>

01:22:43.760 --> 01:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>And this leads into another argument that is often raised.</v>

01:22:48.880 --> 01:22:54.160
<v Speaker 2>This one is particularly popular amongst the Reddit set, and that is</v>

01:22:54.160 --> 01:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the argument that begins with given enough time</v>

01:22:57.680 --> 01:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and then add whatever you want after that.</v>

01:23:02.320 --> 01:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Fundamentally this works because most people are enumerate, and because most people</v>

01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:13.360
<v Speaker 2>are not going to analyze the problems that arise, regardless of how</v>

01:23:13.360 --> 01:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>much time there is.</v>

01:23:15.840 --> 01:23:19.200
<v Speaker 2>And so for instance, if you have</v>

01:23:21.520 --> 01:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>A complex system</v>

01:23:23.840 --> 01:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>composed of say five parts.</v>

01:23:26.480 --> 01:23:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Picked an arbitrary number, it doesn't matter for the example.</v>

01:23:29.360 --> 01:23:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Composed of a number of parts.</v>

01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:36.160
<v Speaker 2>If all of these parts must arise together, and any one part</v>

01:23:36.400 --> 01:23:38.160
<v Speaker 2>arising by itself</v>

01:23:39.120 --> 01:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>not only causes the likelihood of the other parts arising to decrease,</v>

01:23:44.480 --> 01:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>but makes it impossible in some cases, no matter how much time</v>

01:23:48.560 --> 01:23:52.880
<v Speaker 2>you have, you are never going to get to the complex system</v>

01:23:53.040 --> 01:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>arising in toto.</v>

01:23:55.520 --> 01:23:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And this happens in biology.</v>

01:23:57.360 --> 01:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>This is not just an example that I'm picking out of nowhere.</v>

01:24:00.480 --> 01:24:06.880
<v Speaker 2>If you use the primordial soup that biologists like to pretend existed,</v>

01:24:06.880 --> 01:24:07.840
<v Speaker 2>let's say it did.</v>

01:24:07.840 --> 01:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you have the primordial soup.</v>

01:24:10.320 --> 01:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you get a reaction that produces one of the precursors</v>

01:24:15.440 --> 01:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>needed for a certain biological system.</v>

01:24:18.720 --> 01:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>That reaction in a biological system is probably mediated by enzymes, it</v>

01:24:23.760 --> 01:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>almost certainly is.</v>

01:24:24.640 --> 01:24:25.120
<v Speaker 2>It will have</v>

01:24:26.160 --> 01:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>various processes that spin it up, processes that spin it down.</v>

01:24:31.360 --> 01:24:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Just like blood clotting.</v>

01:24:32.960 --> 01:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>If you didn't have something that stopped the clotting, you would just</v>

01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>become one giant clot and die.</v>

01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Which if you want to experience that, you can go get a</v>

01:24:40.640 --> 01:24:43.600
<v Speaker 2>booster shot.</v>

01:24:43.600 --> 01:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>But the problem with the primordial soup</v>

01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>is that there's nothing to mediate this reaction.</v>

01:24:50.800 --> 01:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>So even if you have the enzyme needed to start the reaction,</v>

01:24:53.840 --> 01:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>or let's say it's a reaction that doesn't need an enzyme, it</v>

01:24:55.840 --> 01:25:00.960
<v Speaker 2>just happens very slowly, all of your precursors are going to turn</v>

01:25:00.960 --> 01:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>into your product.</v>

01:25:02.800 --> 01:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>The problem is that many of those precursors are shared by other</v>

01:25:06.320 --> 01:25:08.160
<v Speaker 2>parts of the complex system.</v>

01:25:08.160 --> 01:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>If this particular part of the complex system arises first, it will</v>

01:25:13.040 --> 01:25:14.640
<v Speaker 2>use up all the precursors.</v>

01:25:14.640 --> 01:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>There will be no precursors for the other parts of the complex</v>

01:25:17.120 --> 01:25:17.200
<v Speaker 2>system</v>

01:25:18.080 --> 01:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to arise.</v>

01:25:19.200 --> 01:25:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Your system has just defeated itself, and it doesn't matter how much</v>

01:25:22.880 --> 01:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>time you have, because you have now made it impossible to get</v>

01:25:26.720 --> 01:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to the complex system.</v>

01:25:28.800 --> 01:25:30.320
<v Speaker 2>And this props up everywhere.</v>

01:25:30.320 --> 01:25:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I've given just one simple example of this.</v>

01:25:33.040 --> 01:25:37.360
<v Speaker 2>This happens time and time again, regardless of how much time there</v>

01:25:37.360 --> 01:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>is. And as we'll see, there's not enough time, even according to</v>

01:25:41.280 --> 01:25:48.080
<v Speaker 2>their arguments for billions of years.</v>

01:25:48.080 --> 01:25:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess briefly here I should respond to an objection that will</v>

01:25:53.680 --> 01:26:00.160
<v Speaker 2>come up inevitably regarding supposedly transitional species.</v>

01:26:00.160 --> 01:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>There are certain scientists, archaeologists, paleontologists who will argue that we have</v>

01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>discovered non-humid hominid species.</v>

01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>There are a number of responses to this.</v>

01:26:12.720 --> 01:26:15.440
<v Speaker 2>One response is that if you showed them the skull of the</v>

01:26:15.440 --> 01:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>elephant man, they would probably identify it as some non human creature,</v>

01:26:20.080 --> 01:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that he was just a malformed man.</v>

01:26:22.800 --> 01:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>And this is the case with many sorts of deformities we have.</v>

01:26:26.560 --> 01:26:29.440
<v Speaker 2>You could show them the skeleton of a dwarf, and they might</v>

01:26:29.440 --> 01:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>tell you that it's no it's an ancient hominid that was of</v>

01:26:32.480 --> 01:26:34.160
<v Speaker 2>short stature.</v>

01:26:34.160 --> 01:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>No, they're just deformities that happen to human beings.</v>

01:26:38.560 --> 01:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>If you find a deformed skeleton you haven't found another species, you've</v>

01:26:42.400 --> 01:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>found a deformed skeleton, we have those to day.</v>

01:26:46.320 --> 01:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But as we mentioned in a previous episode, Europeans have Neanderthal DNA.</v>

01:26:52.080 --> 01:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Asians have Denisovin, and Africans have the so called ghost DNA.</v>

01:26:56.960 --> 01:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Are these extinct nonhuman species.</v>

01:27:01.520 --> 01:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>No. They are no longer extant subspecies of the human species.</v>

01:27:10.560 --> 01:27:18.400
<v Speaker 2>The evidence of non-humid hominids is not only incredibly thin,</v>

01:27:18.400 --> 01:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't actually prove any of the supposed things they claim it</v>

01:27:21.840 --> 01:27:26.320
<v Speaker 2>proves. And the more you look into it, the less convincing it</v>

01:27:26.320 --> 01:27:33.440
<v Speaker 2>becomes. On a related note to that, there</v>

01:27:33.440 --> 01:27:37.280
<v Speaker 2>is the issue of radiometric dating.</v>

01:27:37.280 --> 01:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Radiometric dating, very simply, I'm sure many listening already know this.</v>

01:27:42.240 --> 01:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>But it is simply based on the fact that certain forms of</v>

01:27:47.600 --> 01:27:51.600
<v Speaker 2>atoms naturally decay over time.</v>

01:27:51.600 --> 01:27:53.280
<v Speaker 2>It may be a very long time, it may not be</v>

01:27:54.160 --> 01:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>relatively speaking that long of a time.</v>

01:27:56.480 --> 01:28:01.120
<v Speaker 2>There are different pairs that are used for different lengths of time.</v>

01:28:01.120 --> 01:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>And so carbon fourteen is probably the one you've heard the most.</v>

01:28:05.200 --> 01:28:06.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not the most important</v>

01:28:07.120 --> 01:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>one for science, but it's probably the one you've heard the most.</v>

01:28:10.240 --> 01:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>There are other compounds that decay at various rates.</v>

01:28:15.280 --> 01:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>There is a fundamental problem with radiometric dating.</v>

01:28:20.160 --> 01:28:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And that is that the starting conditions are unknown, necessarily unknown.</v>

01:28:26.400 --> 01:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>The starting conditions are conjecture.</v>

01:28:30.400 --> 01:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Which is not science.</v>

01:28:31.520 --> 01:28:32.400
<v Speaker 2>That's conjecture.</v>

01:28:32.400 --> 01:28:33.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a different thing.</v>

01:28:33.440 --> 01:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Science in the sense</v>

01:28:35.360 --> 01:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that those who advocate for evolution would use it.</v>

01:28:39.520 --> 01:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>In order to say that</v>

01:28:42.720 --> 01:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>we now have this proportion of this isotope.</v>

01:28:47.760 --> 01:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Therefore this item is X years old.</v>

01:28:51.200 --> 01:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>You must know the starting proportion of the isotope.</v>

01:28:56.320 --> 01:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>We will go ahead and say that yes, probabilistically you can say</v>

01:29:01.200 --> 01:29:04.400
<v Speaker 2>that if you know the starting proportion and you know the ending</v>

01:29:04.400 --> 01:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>proportion, you can calculate the time.</v>

01:29:06.400 --> 01:29:06.960
<v Speaker 2>That's fine.</v>

01:29:06.960 --> 01:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>That's simple statistics that that follows.</v>

01:29:09.600 --> 01:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>The problem is you can't know the starting proportion.</v>

01:29:12.560 --> 01:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>And you can't know the starting proportion because in many cases the</v>

01:29:15.200 --> 01:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>claim is that it was millions or billions of years ago.</v>

01:29:18.880 --> 01:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>No one was there to measure.</v>

01:29:21.760 --> 01:29:24.880
<v Speaker 2>And so it is based on conjecture.</v>

01:29:24.880 --> 01:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Being based on conjecture, it really isn't even persuasive.</v>

01:29:29.520 --> 01:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>And not only that, there have been many cases where objects of</v>

01:29:34.080 --> 01:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>known age have been taken and radio dated, and they have wound</v>

01:29:40.400 --> 01:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>up with wildly different results that were wildly wrong.</v>

01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>One particular example of this is they have taken fresh rock produced</v>

01:29:49.280 --> 01:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>by volcanoes to various labs to date it, and they've returned completely</v>

01:29:54.560 --> 01:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>inconsistent results.</v>

01:29:55.840 --> 01:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>A million years, eight million years, four million years.</v>

01:29:58.800 --> 01:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Turns out it's twelve years old.</v>

01:30:02.240 --> 01:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So So radiometric dating is not very convincing.</v>

01:30:07.120 --> 01:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Really it's not convincing at</v>

01:30:08.880 --> 01:30:10.960
all.

01:30:11.280 --> 01:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>It's the same sort of problem that we have with a lot</v>

01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of the climate data today, where they will say it's some amazing</v>

01:30:18.800 --> 01:30:25.360
<v Speaker 3>new record and it's it's many percent off norms when the satellite</v>

01:30:25.360 --> 01:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>data goes back 10, 15, 20 years.</v>

01:30:28.720 --> 01:30:32.320
<v Speaker 3>The instrument and data in some cases may go back a hundred</v>

01:30:32.400 --> 01:30:33.520
<v Speaker 3>years or so.</v>

01:30:33.520 --> 01:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you happen to be on the oceans, then you'll have</v>

01:30:36.240 --> 01:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>some records from the eighteen hundreds where ship captains were recording as</v>

01:30:40.320 --> 01:30:44.080
<v Speaker 3>best they could with you know, obviously non-calibrated instruments.</v>

01:30:44.080 --> 01:30:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And so you can have some vague sense, but for us to</v>

01:30:48.480 --> 01:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>claim today that what we are observing is normal and then to</v>

01:30:53.280 --> 01:30:55.120
<v Speaker 3>extrapolate back in time.</v>

01:30:55.120 --> 01:30:57.120
<v Speaker 3>As Corey just said, that that's not science.</v>

01:30:57.120 --> 01:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Like it's it's scientific inquiry.</v>

01:30:59.280 --> 01:31:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Like it's fine to try to model stuff.</v>

01:31:01.120 --> 01:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>That's intelligent.</v>

01:31:02.400 --> 01:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But you don't make absolute claims when you have cr when you</v>

01:31:08.080 --> 01:31:11.040
<v Speaker 3>put garbage in, you don't then swear by it.</v>

01:31:11.040 --> 01:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>And you certainly don't browbeat people who think something different when your</v>

01:31:16.400 --> 01:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>evidence is functionally no better than their evidence.</v>

01:31:20.320 --> 01:31:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's again that's why we began we began with scripture because</v>

01:31:23.440 --> 01:31:27.600
<v Speaker 3>as Christians, the Word of God is our evidence.</v>

01:31:27.600 --> 01:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>It is the standard by which we evaluate reality.</v>

01:31:31.440 --> 01:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>And so if Scripture says that the sun rises in the west</v>

01:31:35.360 --> 01:31:38.640
<v Speaker 3>and we see the sun rising in the east, I'm gonna believe</v>

01:31:38.640 --> 01:31:41.200
<v Speaker 3>the Bible as a matter of faith.</v>

01:31:41.200 --> 01:31:46.320
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, we don't have to believe things that are counterfactual</v>

01:31:46.640 --> 01:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>because what we're told in scripture never ends up being in opposition</v>

01:31:52.320 --> 01:31:54.560
<v Speaker 3>to what we find in creation.</v>

01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:58.080
<v Speaker 3>There are things where we can't maybe come up with a scientific</v>

01:31:58.080 --> 01:32:02.640
<v Speaker 3>explanation. You know, obviously if if the rocks on the earth appear</v>

01:32:02.640 --> 01:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to be millions of years old,</v>

01:32:06.640 --> 01:32:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that's a it's an inconsistency, but it's not an inconsistency that undermines</v>

01:32:12.080 --> 01:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>scripture. It's something that should be addressed.</v>

01:32:14.800 --> 01:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's part of the reason that we're doing this episode is</v>

01:32:17.200 --> 01:32:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that Christians should have sound answers to this.</v>

01:32:20.880 --> 01:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't want Christians to be shrieking about Darwin and just just</v>

01:32:26.800 --> 01:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>being completely incoherent.</v>

01:32:28.560 --> 01:32:30.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's what happens to Corey and I when we try</v>

01:32:30.720 --> 01:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>to talk about race.</v>

01:32:32.080 --> 01:32:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Race is genetic.</v>

01:32:33.920 --> 01:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>It's genetic in a way that's explainable in scripture, going back six</v>

01:32:38.480 --> 01:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>thousand years and going back to the flood, everything, all the variation</v>

01:32:42.800 --> 01:32:46.800
<v Speaker 3>that we see today is explainable both in scientific terms and in</v>

01:32:46.800 --> 01:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>scriptural terms.</v>

01:32:47.680 --> 01:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>The two are not at odds.</v>

01:32:49.280 --> 01:32:53.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, the mention of dog breeds, most of the the variations</v>

01:32:53.440 --> 01:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>of dog breeds today are less than two hundred years old.</v>

01:32:56.720 --> 01:33:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Some of the primary forms go back three and four thousand years,</v>

01:33:00.240 --> 01:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>but</v>

01:33:01.440 --> 01:33:05.040
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the incredible variety today, there I saw one</v>

01:33:05.040 --> 01:33:08.000
<v Speaker 3>list that showed like four hundred and fifty distinct dog breeds.</v>

01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Most of those are new.</v>

01:33:09.600 --> 01:33:15.280
<v Speaker 3>And they're new in very substantially obvious ways, as Cory is saying,</v>

01:33:15.280 --> 01:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>if you were an alien who landed on Earth and you dug</v>

01:33:18.960 --> 01:33:24.240
<v Speaker 3>up a Parsons Russell Terrier and you dug up a Great Dane,</v>

01:33:24.240 --> 01:33:27.440
<v Speaker 3>you might you know, if you're pretty good at it, you might</v>

01:33:27.440 --> 01:33:32.400
<v Speaker 3>be able to determine them morphologically they were similar at some point,</v>

01:33:32.400 --> 01:33:35.440
<v Speaker 3>you would never necessarily conclude that they were the same species from</v>

01:33:35.440 --> 01:33:36.400
<v Speaker 3>those two examples.</v>

01:33:36.400 --> 01:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Because he said, like, either one is a very tiny amateur version</v>

01:33:40.080 --> 01:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>of the other, or one is a mutant version or deformed or</v>

01:33:43.280 --> 01:33:45.360
<v Speaker 3>something. You would never think they were both dogs.</v>

01:33:45.520 --> 01:33:47.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, we because we know the time periods are like, well,</v>

01:33:47.760 --> 01:33:49.440
<v Speaker 3>yeah, that's they're both clearly dogs.</v>

01:33:49.440 --> 01:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>We can we can analyze their genes and we know the history</v>

01:33:52.160 --> 01:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>of the breeds.</v>

01:33:53.360 --> 01:33:53.680
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

01:33:54.880 --> 01:33:58.160
<v Speaker 3>when we look at data and then we look at scripture, as</v>

01:33:58.160 --> 01:34:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Christians, we have to believe scripture, and then you know, I hope</v>

01:34:01.360 --> 01:34:02.640
<v Speaker 3>that the data accords.</v>

01:34:02.640 --> 01:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Like it's it's easier for me as a Christian, as a young</v>

01:34:05.120 --> 01:34:10.320
<v Speaker 3>earth creationist, when I point to these things And it's consistent with</v>

01:34:10.320 --> 01:34:11.280
<v Speaker 3>what I already believe.</v>

01:34:11.280 --> 01:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Now it doesn't undermine my faith that it doesn't, but it's easier</v>

01:34:14.960 --> 01:34:18.560
<v Speaker 3>in this world, especially in this day, to be credible to someone</v>

01:34:18.560 --> 01:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>who's also intelligent and they believe you know they're well informed based</v>

01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:26.080
<v Speaker 3>on the cutting edge version of the knowledge that they're given.</v>

01:34:26.080 --> 01:34:28.560
<v Speaker 3>If you have an explanation that doesn't make you look like you</v>

01:34:28.560 --> 01:34:32.640
<v Speaker 3>just say you have to believe my crazy skydaddy religion and you</v>

01:34:32.640 --> 01:34:34.720
<v Speaker 3>have to take all these articles of faith.</v>

01:34:34.880 --> 01:34:36.960
<v Speaker 3>As I said at the beginning, it turns out that when you</v>

01:34:36.960 --> 01:34:40.720
<v Speaker 3>go down this path of theistic evolution and</v>

01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:45.280
<v Speaker 3>long periods of time, it turns out that you have to have</v>

01:34:45.280 --> 01:34:50.320
<v Speaker 3>a de greater degree of faith in the theories presented by modern</v>

01:34:50.320 --> 01:34:53.440
<v Speaker 3>scientists than you would if you simply believed in the six days</v>

01:34:53.440 --> 01:34:54.720
<v Speaker 3>of creation.</v>

01:34:54.720 --> 01:34:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in the case of some of the time periods necessary to</v>

01:34:58.560 --> 01:35:02.800
<v Speaker 3>achieve some of the results, even conceivably, even for some of the</v>

01:35:02.800 --> 01:35:07.840
<v Speaker 3>results that you know, where it's completely a random process and they</v>

01:35:07.840 --> 01:35:10.640
<v Speaker 3>say, well, given a long, you know, it's the the million monkeys</v>

01:35:10.640 --> 01:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that a typewriter a typewriter's m may eventually produce the works of</v>

01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Shakespeare, that level of absurd speculation requires a duration of the existence</v>

01:35:20.240 --> 01:35:24.400
<v Speaker 3>of the universe that's orders of magnitudes beyond orders of magnitude beyond</v>

01:35:24.880 --> 01:35:28.480
<v Speaker 3>what we know to be true based on all available data.</v>

01:35:28.480 --> 01:35:31.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I saw some of the latest speculation was maybe the</v>

01:35:31.040 --> 01:35:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Earth's or the universe is twenty six point seven billion years old</v>

01:35:34.800 --> 01:35:35.360
<v Speaker 3>or something.</v>

01:35:35.360 --> 01:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't care.</v>

01:35:35.920 --> 01:35:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Like it doesn't it doesn't concern me if the thirteen point eight</v>

01:35:38.800 --> 01:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>billion, which is a number I've used in the in episode six.</v>

01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:44.480
<v Speaker 3>If that turns out to be wrong, who cares?</v>

01:35:44.480 --> 01:35:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Like it's I'm always glad when we're learning more about how God</v>

01:35:48.080 --> 01:35:50.640
<v Speaker 3>put creation together because it's cool.</v>

01:35:50.640 --> 01:35:51.920
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting.</v>

01:35:51.920 --> 01:35:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I every week I tune in to look at the latest James</v>

01:35:54.640 --> 01:35:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Webb telescope pictures and data because they're looking back to the very</v>

01:35:59.200 --> 01:36:02.000
<v Speaker 3>beginnings of the creation of the universe.</v>

01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And what's funny is they're finding more and more impossible things.</v>

01:36:05.520 --> 01:36:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the further back they look, they're finding, for example, much more mature</v>

01:36:09.520 --> 01:36:13.520
<v Speaker 3>galaxies that according to their current models couldn't possibly exist.</v>

01:36:13.520 --> 01:36:17.120
<v Speaker 3>You couldn't have a a galaxy as fully flushed out as some</v>

01:36:17.120 --> 01:36:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of the galaxies they're finding, you know, just a couple hundred million</v>

01:36:20.400 --> 01:36:22.640
<v Speaker 3>years after the big bang.</v>

01:36:22.640 --> 01:36:25.360
<v Speaker 3>That's not possible based on any of their theories.</v>

01:36:25.360 --> 01:36:28.080
<v Speaker 3>It's possible based on my theory because I just believe that God</v>

01:36:28.080 --> 01:36:31.040
<v Speaker 3>put the stuff together and he set it in motion in six</v>

01:36:31.040 --> 01:36:34.720
<v Speaker 3>days. And so as we're looking, you know you know, through thirteen</v>

01:36:34.720 --> 01:36:39.280
<v Speaker 3>point six, you know, five or four billion light years of distance</v>

01:36:39.280 --> 01:36:41.040
<v Speaker 3>for that light to travel to us.</v>

01:36:41.120 --> 01:36:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's one of the questions that I think we we skipped</v>

01:36:44.480 --> 01:36:46.080
<v Speaker 3>over earlier.</v>

01:36:46.080 --> 01:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>If the universe is only six thousand years old, how do we</v>

01:36:49.040 --> 01:36:49.840
<v Speaker 3>see in the light?</v>

01:36:49.840 --> 01:36:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, as we said at the beginning, God created light before he</v>

01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>created stars.</v>

01:36:55.600 --> 01:36:56.640
<v Speaker 3>How does that work?</v>

01:36:56.640 --> 01:36:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.</v>

01:36:57.680 --> 01:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>But the system was complete when he said it was very good.</v>

01:37:01.440 --> 01:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>And so if there's light appearing, I think that's cool.</v>

01:37:04.640 --> 01:37:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I think like that's it.</v>

01:37:06.080 --> 01:37:08.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a st it's a stupid response, but I think</v>

01:37:08.880 --> 01:37:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that's cool.</v>

01:37:09.600 --> 01:37:14.800
<v Speaker 3>God put a star 14 billion years away, and then he put</v>

01:37:14.800 --> 01:37:18.880
<v Speaker 3>all of the photons from that star all the way along so</v>

01:37:18.880 --> 01:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>that any human being at any point of observ observation would be</v>

01:37:22.640 --> 01:37:23.920
<v Speaker 3>able to see the light.</v>

01:37:23.920 --> 01:37:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Why? So we know the star is there.</v>

01:37:25.760 --> 01:37:27.520
<v Speaker 3>And because it was a complete system.</v>

01:37:27.520 --> 01:37:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Like God didn't put the photons in transit just for our sake</v>

01:37:33.040 --> 01:37:34.320
<v Speaker 3>or for our sake at all.</v>

01:37:34.320 --> 01:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>He did it because he wanted a complete system.</v>

01:37:36.640 --> 01:37:41.360
<v Speaker 3>And And when it's set in motion and everything just works, the</v>

01:37:41.360 --> 01:37:46.560
<v Speaker 3>scientists who deny God have to try to find some explanation for</v>

01:37:46.560 --> 01:37:50.240
<v Speaker 3>patterns. And the explanation is in the system in the sense that</v>

01:37:50.240 --> 01:37:52.000
<v Speaker 3>all of it just works.</v>

01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's the the normalcy bias that has really completely</v>

01:37:55.840 --> 01:38:00.560
<v Speaker 3>overwhelmed modern scientific thought to think, well, you know, this exists so</v>

01:38:00.560 --> 01:38:02.560
<v Speaker 3>obviously this must exist exist.</v>

01:38:02.560 --> 01:38:05.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, and sometimes they'll talk about the the unlikeliness of the</v>

01:38:05.760 --> 01:38:09.280
<v Speaker 3>creation of life or whatever and in particular the fact that there's</v>

01:38:09.200 --> 01:38:11.760
<v Speaker 3>no evidence for life anywhere else in the universe.</v>

01:38:11.760 --> 01:38:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I I don't think that's a strong evidence against the scientific arguments</v>

01:38:16.320 --> 01:38:20.320
<v Speaker 3>against scripture for the simple reason that in my lifetime we didn't</v>

01:38:20.240 --> 01:38:23.520
<v Speaker 3>have any proof that other planets existed.</v>

01:38:23.520 --> 01:38:27.760
<v Speaker 3>It's only, you know, in in I think maybe Zoomer lifetimes, certainly</v>

01:38:27.760 --> 01:38:32.400
<v Speaker 3>millennial lifetimes, that we've actually found physical evidence for exoplanets.</v>

01:38:32.400 --> 01:38:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Before that was just theoretical.</v>

01:38:34.080 --> 01:38:37.360
<v Speaker 3>So we're always finding new things.</v>

01:38:37.360 --> 01:38:39.840
<v Speaker 3>But I can say as a Christian we're not going to find</v>

01:38:39.840 --> 01:38:41.840
<v Speaker 3>life because this is where God put life.</v>

01:38:41.840 --> 01:38:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Everything else is dead.</v>

01:38:43.040 --> 01:38:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Will that be the case in the new Earth?</v>

01:38:44.960 --> 01:38:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.</v>

01:38:45.520 --> 01:38:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Personally I think it probably won't be.</v>

01:38:47.200 --> 01:38:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I think there will probably be life elsewhere and I think we'll</v>

01:38:49.360 --> 01:38:50.640
<v Speaker 3>probably take it with us.</v>

01:38:50.640 --> 01:38:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that God put all that stuff out there, including the</v>

01:38:53.920 --> 01:38:56.560
<v Speaker 3>planets, for us to actually explore.</v>

01:38:56.640 --> 01:38:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's gonna happen in this earth, but I think</v>

01:38:59.280 --> 01:39:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in the new earth, we're still gonna have the urge to explore.</v>

01:39:02.480 --> 01:39:05.440
<v Speaker 3>God made us to you know to fill the earth and subdue</v>

01:39:05.440 --> 01:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>it. All this space, I don't think we're just stuck in the</v>

01:39:09.200 --> 01:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>some corner of the Milky Way galaxy.</v>

01:39:11.680 --> 01:39:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that we will be able to travel.</v>

01:39:13.920 --> 01:39:15.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not a matter of faith.</v>

01:39:15.520 --> 01:39:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It's just my personal opinion.</v>

01:39:17.040 --> 01:39:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Because when I see the stuff, it's it's cool.</v>

01:39:19.280 --> 01:39:22.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think that people want to go see interesting stuff.</v>

01:39:22.320 --> 01:39:26.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's back to the the prior episode just dealing with</v>

01:39:26.080 --> 01:39:30.080
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theories, one of the worst things that's come out of the</v>

01:39:30.240 --> 01:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>skepticism about the moon landing is people saying space is fake and</v>

01:39:34.480 --> 01:39:35.920
<v Speaker 3>gay. It's not even real.</v>

01:39:35.920 --> 01:39:41.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, the flat earth stuff ends up reducing the immense beauty</v>

01:39:41.520 --> 01:39:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and splendor of creation, of God's creation, that testifies to his glory.</v>

01:39:47.280 --> 01:39:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I just don't want to rob God of the glory that he</v>

01:39:50.320 --> 01:39:51.920
<v Speaker 3>ascribes to himself.</v>

01:39:52.160 --> 01:39:55.120
<v Speaker 3>As he said in in the ending chapters of Job that the</v>

01:39:55.120 --> 01:39:57.920
<v Speaker 3>heavens testify to his glory, all of it.</v>

01:39:57.920 --> 01:40:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Everything we see in in this world, everything that we see in</v>

01:40:00.880 --> 01:40:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the heavens, it's all</v>

01:40:03.040 --> 01:40:05.920
<v Speaker 3>God revealing himself as himself.</v>

01:40:05.920 --> 01:40:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Not only to us, but just for its own sake.</v>

01:40:08.240 --> 01:40:09.520
<v Speaker 3>He put all this stuff together.</v>

01:40:09.520 --> 01:40:12.720
<v Speaker 3>There's stuff we'll never ever be able to understand.</v>

01:40:12.800 --> 01:40:14.880
<v Speaker 3>No matter how long we look or how hard we think about</v>

01:40:14.880 --> 01:40:17.200
<v Speaker 3>it, there's stuff that's too far away to see.</v>

01:40:17.200 --> 01:40:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Well it's not there for us.</v>

01:40:18.640 --> 01:40:20.880
<v Speaker 3>It's there because God wanted to do it.</v>

01:40:20.880 --> 01:40:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And as a Christian, I take comfort in that.</v>

01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:28.320
<v Speaker 3>It never, when there's new discoveries, it never yeah, every time as</v>

01:40:28.320 --> 01:40:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I said in the the episode on scripture, it never undermines my</v>

01:40:32.240 --> 01:40:34.720
<v Speaker 3>faith because it's always more of what I always knew.</v>

01:40:34.720 --> 01:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Genesis passage we opened with, it's the very first thing</v>

01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that I personally read as a child when my parents were teaching</v>

01:40:41.280 --> 01:40:43.520
<v Speaker 3>me to read the first novel thing that they sent in front</v>

01:40:43.520 --> 01:40:44.880
<v Speaker 3>of me and said, Go read this.</v>

01:40:44.880 --> 01:40:48.640
<v Speaker 3>It was Genesis one and following.</v>

01:40:48.640 --> 01:40:52.560
<v Speaker 3>I knew the things the scientists are only now discovering because I</v>

01:40:52.560 --> 01:40:54.480
<v Speaker 3>believed those simple words.</v>

01:40:54.480 --> 01:40:56.720
<v Speaker 3>They weren't scientific explanations.</v>

01:40:56.720 --> 01:41:00.560
<v Speaker 3>They were explanations that a four-year-old could understand, or that Moses could</v>

01:41:00.560 --> 01:41:04.320
<v Speaker 3>understand, in an age where you know, they had astronomy, but they</v>

01:41:04.320 --> 01:41:06.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't know the details we know.</v>

01:41:06.640 --> 01:41:07.760
<v Speaker 3>It didn't matter.</v>

01:41:07.760 --> 01:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>God gave us what we need in Scripture to believe in Him,</v>

01:41:11.520 --> 01:41:16.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's not at odds with the revelation of God in all</v>

01:41:16.400 --> 01:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>of creation.</v>

01:41:17.680 --> 01:41:20.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think these subjects are important for us to be conversant</v>

01:41:20.480 --> 01:41:23.280
<v Speaker 3>in because we're a part of the world.</v>

01:41:23.280 --> 01:41:25.840
<v Speaker 3>We're a part of being able to speak to others.</v>

01:41:25.840 --> 01:41:29.120
<v Speaker 3>And in particular today, when we have a lot of people who</v>

01:41:29.120 --> 01:41:33.360
<v Speaker 3>are looking at the church for the moral questions.</v>

01:41:33.360 --> 01:41:37.760
<v Speaker 3>If we attack those people on the basis of our being bad</v>

01:41:37.760 --> 01:41:41.840
<v Speaker 3>at scientific explanations, that's going to undermine their ability to come to</v>

01:41:41.840 --> 01:41:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the faith.</v>

01:41:42.560 --> 01:41:43.680
<v Speaker 3>It truly will.</v>

01:41:43.680 --> 01:41:46.720
<v Speaker 3>As I said before, if you sound retarded as a Christian when</v>

01:41:46.720 --> 01:41:49.840
<v Speaker 3>you talk about things that someone knows something about, they're not going</v>

01:41:49.840 --> 01:41:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to take you seriously.</v>

01:41:51.360 --> 01:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not that everyone has to be conversant and everything.</v>

01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:56.480
<v Speaker 3>As I said, like I'm Corey's going to do an infinitely better</v>

01:41:56.480 --> 01:41:59.360
<v Speaker 3>job at explaining some of the science than I could.</v>

01:41:59.360 --> 01:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I would give a much simpler version.</v>

01:42:01.200 --> 01:42:02.480
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.</v>

01:42:02.480 --> 01:42:05.200
<v Speaker 3>If you want to go in depth, the depth is there, but</v>

01:42:05.200 --> 01:42:10.960
<v Speaker 3>the anchor should not be perfect knowledge of scientific facts about creation,</v>

01:42:10.960 --> 01:42:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the anchor should be scripture and what God has revealed in the</v>

01:42:14.960 --> 01:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Word. Because when the revelation of the Word is consistent with the</v>

01:42:19.520 --> 01:42:24.480
<v Speaker 3>revelation of creation, which is always the case, that's something for us</v>

01:42:24.480 --> 01:42:27.360
<v Speaker 3>to give thanks for as Christians and for us to be excited</v>

01:42:27.360 --> 01:42:29.040
<v Speaker 3>about sharing with unbelievers.</v>

01:42:29.040 --> 01:42:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And for those who are curious, we should be able to say</v>

01:42:31.760 --> 01:42:36.480
<v Speaker 3>this book that's thousands of years old is consistent, it's consonant with</v>

01:42:36.480 --> 01:42:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the things that you know in the things where there's an apparent</v>

01:42:39.680 --> 01:42:44.960
<v Speaker 3>disagreement. Let's talk through it because it turns out that your faith-based</v>

01:42:44.960 --> 01:42:48.400
<v Speaker 3>belief system in what you've been taught is actually a much bigger</v>

01:42:48.400 --> 01:42:52.800
<v Speaker 3>stretch than our faith-based belief system that a God spoke the universe</v>

01:42:52.800 --> 01:42:56.480
<v Speaker 3>into existence six thousand years ago and everything just worked.</v>

01:42:56.480 --> 01:42:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I take comfort in that and I hope to share that comfort</v>

01:42:59.280 --> 01:43:00.240
<v Speaker 3>with others as</v>

01:43:00.240 --> 01:43:01.440
well.

01:43:01.440 --> 01:43:06.640
<v Speaker 2>That's an important point, and you raised it previously as well, but</v>

01:43:06.640 --> 01:43:10.160
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the remaining five points I'd like to make in</v>

01:43:10.160 --> 01:43:11.760
<v Speaker 2>this section.</v>

01:43:11.760 --> 01:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>It takes more faith to believe in science, so called, than it</v>

01:43:15.520 --> 01:43:19.360
<v Speaker 2>does to believe in God.</v>

01:43:19.360 --> 01:43:24.800
<v Speaker 2>But fundamentally, it is important first to realize that both are based</v>

01:43:24.800 --> 01:43:25.760
<v Speaker 2>on faith</v>

01:43:26.960 --> 01:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>You have to have faith in the science</v>

01:43:30.800 --> 01:43:32.320
<v Speaker 2>or you have to have faith in God.</v>

01:43:32.320 --> 01:43:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Now you can have faith in both to some degree, but you</v>

01:43:36.640 --> 01:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>cannot believe the science where it contradicts what God says, if you</v>

01:43:41.600 --> 01:43:43.360
<v Speaker 2>have faith in God.</v>

01:43:43.360 --> 01:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Alternatively, you can have faith in the science and say that God</v>

01:43:47.040 --> 01:43:47.920
<v Speaker 2>is wrong.</v>

01:43:47.920 --> 01:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't recommend that.</v>

01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:53.200
<v Speaker 2>But those are the two options.</v>

01:43:53.200 --> 01:43:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Science likes to claim, and this is one of the other remaining</v>

01:43:57.040 --> 01:44:02.720
<v Speaker 2>points, but science likes to claim that it is entirely objective, that</v>

01:44:02.720 --> 01:44:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it is truly empirical, it relies only on the senses and what</v>

01:44:06.960 --> 01:44:14.320
<v Speaker 2>can be measured and tested and falsified can be reduced to data</v>

01:44:14.320 --> 01:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>somewhere and then analyzed.</v>

01:44:17.360 --> 01:44:20.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's simply not true.</v>

01:44:20.160 --> 01:44:27.920
<v Speaker 2>For one, science largely focuses on induction, which is the</v>

01:44:27.920 --> 01:44:31.360
<v Speaker 2>inference of a rule from specific data points.</v>

01:44:31.360 --> 01:44:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So again it's just empiricism.</v>

01:44:33.520 --> 01:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to deduction which is the use of the rule to</v>

01:44:38.560 --> 01:44:40.800
<v Speaker 2>determine what will happen in individual cases.</v>

01:44:40.800 --> 01:44:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Now science does both.</v>

01:44:42.000 --> 01:44:44.080
<v Speaker 2>It tries to go up to the rule and then down from</v>

01:44:44.080 --> 01:44:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the rule.</v>

01:44:45.120 --> 01:44:49.680
<v Speaker 2>But science is largely an empirical enterprise.</v>

01:44:49.680 --> 01:44:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But fundamental to this empirical enterprise is really something taken perhaps</v>

01:44:56.960 --> 01:45:00.640
<v Speaker 2>somewhat ironically, from philosophy, from David Hume.</v>

01:45:00.640 --> 01:45:06.240
<v Speaker 2>And that is the exclusion of miracles of God, of anything that</v>

01:45:06.240 --> 01:45:12.080
<v Speaker 2>is not to the mind of the scientist, empirical.</v>

01:45:12.080 --> 01:45:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Now if you're ever at a trial, whether you're attorney, a party,</v>

01:45:16.800 --> 01:45:22.320
<v Speaker 2>or member of the jury, the beginning of the trial phase starts</v>

01:45:22.320 --> 01:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>with what is called void dire, which is just old French for</v>

01:45:26.160 --> 01:45:28.080
<v Speaker 2>speak truthfully.</v>

01:45:28.080 --> 01:45:33.280
<v Speaker 2>That is the interrogation, I guess you could say uncharitably, but is</v>

01:45:33.360 --> 01:45:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the interviewing of of the potential members of the jury panel, the</v>

01:45:38.640 --> 01:45:43.120
<v Speaker 2>members of the jury pool, to determine if they are suitable for</v>

01:45:43.120 --> 01:45:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the jury.</v>

01:45:44.560 --> 01:45:49.120
<v Speaker 2>During that phase, as the attorney, you have two kinds of ways</v>

01:45:50.160 --> 01:45:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to strike jurors from the pool and therefore not impanel them.</v>

01:45:55.360 --> 01:45:59.040
<v Speaker 2>They will not be part of the eventual jury that hears the</v>

01:45:59.040 --> 01:46:03.200
<v Speaker 2>case. The first is a challenge for cause.</v>

01:46:03.200 --> 01:46:04.960
<v Speaker 2>You have an infinite number of these.</v>

01:46:04.960 --> 01:46:07.440
<v Speaker 2>And the reason you have an infinite number of these is because</v>

01:46:07.440 --> 01:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>a challenge for cause is a challenge where you have a cause.</v>

01:46:11.200 --> 01:46:15.760
<v Speaker 2>So for instance, if you have someone in the jury pool who</v>

01:46:15.760 --> 01:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>hates your client</v>

01:46:18.240 --> 01:46:22.000
<v Speaker 2>or thinks that all people who have your client's hair color are</v>

01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:27.600
<v Speaker 2>guilty of crimes, or whatever it happens to be, some cause that</v>

01:46:27.600 --> 01:46:32.560
<v Speaker 2>is a legitimate reason to dismiss this person from the jury pool.</v>

01:46:32.560 --> 01:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>You can dismiss for cause, as long as you can state that</v>

01:46:36.080 --> 01:46:38.000
<v Speaker 2>cause and the judge accepts it.</v>

01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Which is to say that it's in the law.</v>

01:46:40.560 --> 01:46:43.920
<v Speaker 2>The other kind of judge that you have is what is called</v>

01:46:43.920 --> 01:46:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a peremptory challenge.</v>

01:46:45.840 --> 01:46:51.120
<v Speaker 2>A peremptory challenge is for use where you do not have a</v>

01:46:51.120 --> 01:46:52.800
<v Speaker 2>cause that you can state.</v>

01:46:52.800 --> 01:46:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Now you can read into that whatever you please, but where you</v>

01:46:56.160 --> 01:47:00.240
<v Speaker 2>cannot state a challenge for cause, you can use one of your</v>

01:47:00.240 --> 01:47:01.360
<v Speaker 2>peremptory challenges.</v>

01:47:01.360 --> 01:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Now I say one of because you have a limited number.</v>

01:47:04.160 --> 01:47:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Depends on the venue and the kind of case as to how</v>

01:47:06.720 --> 01:47:12.560
<v Speaker 2>many you have, but you have to use them strategically and carefully.</v>

01:47:12.560 --> 01:47:16.000
<v Speaker 2>That's fine in a court of law, it has a place in</v>

01:47:16.160 --> 01:47:17.920
<v Speaker 2>certain venues.</v>

01:47:17.920 --> 01:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>That should not be something that we use in scientific investigation.</v>

01:47:22.960 --> 01:47:29.600
<v Speaker 2>If you peremptorily exclude certain causes, certain explanations for phenomena, you have</v>

01:47:29.600 --> 01:47:34.320
<v Speaker 2>artificially limited yourself and crippled yourself, quite frankly, because you will not</v>

01:47:34.320 --> 01:47:39.200
<v Speaker 2>be able to arrive at a correct conclusion if the correct conclusion</v>

01:47:39.200 --> 01:47:43.600
<v Speaker 2>is contained with what you peremptorily excluded.</v>

01:47:43.600 --> 01:47:49.600
<v Speaker 2>If you peremptorily exclude something and it turns out that that thing</v>

01:47:49.600 --> 01:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>is the cause of what you are investigating, there is no way</v>

01:47:55.200 --> 01:47:57.840
<v Speaker 2>for you to arrive at the correct conclusion.</v>

01:47:58.800 --> 01:48:01.760
<v Speaker 2>And that is exactly what modern science does.</v>

01:48:02.080 --> 01:48:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Because modern science, as a peremptory exclusion, says that miracles do not</v>

01:48:07.280 --> 01:48:11.920
<v Speaker 2>take place, says that God does not exist, says that design is</v>

01:48:11.920 --> 01:48:14.640
<v Speaker 2>not the explanation for life.</v>

01:48:14.640 --> 01:48:19.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you do that, you necessarily have limited your field of</v>

01:48:19.440 --> 01:48:24.160
<v Speaker 2>investigation. And so modern science isn't really science because it's not attempting</v>

01:48:24.160 --> 01:48:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to find true knowledge, it is attempting to find an explanation for</v>

01:48:28.800 --> 01:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>everything that exists in the absence of God.</v>

01:48:32.560 --> 01:48:35.360
<v Speaker 2>That is what modern science actually is.</v>

01:48:35.360 --> 01:48:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Modern science is simply a long, convoluted, complicated attempt to explain away</v>

01:48:41.680 --> 01:48:46.000
<v Speaker 2>God. Because they don't want to believe in God.</v>

01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not because there isn't evidence for God.</v>

01:48:48.800 --> 01:48:52.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not because God doesn't have explanatory power, it's not because we</v>

01:48:52.800 --> 01:48:56.080
<v Speaker 2>can't look at creation and see that there was in fact a</v>

01:48:56.080 --> 01:48:58.960
<v Speaker 2>designer, that there is a designer.</v>

01:48:58.960 --> 01:49:03.040
<v Speaker 2>It's because they do not want God to be real, because they</v>

01:49:03.040 --> 01:49:06.320
<v Speaker 2>do not want to have to obey God.</v>

01:49:06.320 --> 01:49:09.920
<v Speaker 2>That is why science engages in the way that it does, and</v>

01:49:09.920 --> 01:49:14.560
<v Speaker 2>that is not properly science, that is an artificial construct that sh</v>

01:49:14.720 --> 01:49:17.200
<v Speaker 2>has no right to be called science.</v>

01:49:17.200 --> 01:49:21.760
<v Speaker 2>But that is what we have today.</v>

01:49:21.760 --> 01:49:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And one of the ways that science hand waves away very clear</v>

01:49:27.360 --> 01:49:34.800
<v Speaker 2>instances of something that is inexplicable according to their materialism or clearly</v>

01:49:34.800 --> 01:49:39.520
<v Speaker 2>shows design is they will call it an emergent property or an</v>

01:49:39.520 --> 01:49:42.480
<v Speaker 2>emergent phenomenon.</v>

01:49:42.480 --> 01:49:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Anytime you hear either of those phrases, you should be on maximum</v>

01:49:48.480 --> 01:49:54.480
<v Speaker 2>guard. This person is probably or almost certainly trying to mislead you.</v>

01:49:54.480 --> 01:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>One thing that some scientists have now started calling an emergent phenomenon</v>

01:50:01.120 --> 01:50:02.720
<v Speaker 2>is consciousness.</v>

01:50:03.840 --> 01:50:07.680
<v Speaker 2>They just hand wave away the problem of consciousness, which is one</v>

01:50:07.680 --> 01:50:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of the problems listed earlier, a serious problem that science, using its</v>

01:50:11.760 --> 01:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>methods cannot explain, they hand wave it away by saying If you</v>

01:50:16.480 --> 01:50:22.800
<v Speaker 2>create the brain, that material that just as an effect of existing</v>

01:50:23.120 --> 01:50:26.320
<v Speaker 2>produces the mind.</v>

01:50:26.320 --> 01:50:28.000
<v Speaker 2>What's the problem with that?</v>

01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Well they don't give you any mechanism by which that happens.</v>

01:50:31.680 --> 01:50:34.400
<v Speaker 2>They don't give you a means, and not only that, it can't</v>

01:50:34.400 --> 01:50:38.080
<v Speaker 2>be falsified, it can't be tested, and so it isn't science by</v>

01:50:38.080 --> 01:50:39.440
<v Speaker 2>their own definition.</v>

01:50:39.440 --> 01:50:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But they constantly do this.</v>

01:50:41.120 --> 01:50:45.040
<v Speaker 2>They encounter a hard problem they say all an emergent property, emergent</v>

01:50:45.200 --> 01:50:46.160
<v Speaker 2>phenomenon</v>

01:50:47.600 --> 01:50:51.680
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the ways they deliberately mislead you to make</v>

01:50:51.680 --> 01:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you believe that they have an answer for everything when they very</v>

01:50:54.160 --> 01:50:58.800
<v Speaker 2>clearly do not have an answer.</v>

01:50:58.800 --> 01:51:02.160
<v Speaker 2>And so the penultimate issue that I would like to address is</v>

01:51:02.240 --> 01:51:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I've said we would get into a little bit of math, and</v>

01:51:05.200 --> 01:51:07.120
<v Speaker 2>this is the little bit of math.</v>

01:51:07.120 --> 01:51:13.520
<v Speaker 2>We already mentioned DNA and RNA and the base pairs and those</v>

01:51:13.520 --> 01:51:20.320
<v Speaker 2>things. In a really very real, perhaps amusing sense human beings are</v>

01:51:20.960 --> 01:51:23.840
<v Speaker 2>fertilizer held together by sugar.</v>

01:51:23.840 --> 01:51:26.000
<v Speaker 2>If you don't get the joke, then you should look up the</v>

01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:28.240
<v Speaker 2>constituent parts of DNA.</v>

01:51:28.240 --> 01:51:28.400
<v Speaker 2>But</v>

01:51:29.680 --> 01:51:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the mathematics for this</v>

01:51:32.320 --> 01:51:33.760
<v Speaker 2>are very important.</v>

01:51:33.760 --> 01:51:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And here is why.</v>

01:51:35.600 --> 01:51:41.360
<v Speaker 2>In the human genome, there are three billion base pairs.</v>

01:51:41.360 --> 01:51:44.720
<v Speaker 2>If you give the diploid number, so not giving a gamete, giving</v>

01:51:44.720 --> 01:51:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a somatic cell instead, six billion base pairs total.</v>

01:51:49.040 --> 01:51:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Including because you have two copies of each chromosome.</v>

01:51:53.360 --> 01:51:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Except for the sex chromosome, if you are male, then you have</v>

01:51:56.480 --> 01:51:59.440
<v Speaker 2>one X and one Y, as opposed to females who still have</v>

01:51:59.440 --> 01:52:00.480
<v Speaker 2>two copies.</v>

01:52:00.480 --> 01:52:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Assuming nothing has gone wrong.</v>

01:52:02.880 --> 01:52:07.280
<v Speaker 2>But you have six billion base pairs in your diploid cells.</v>

01:52:07.280 --> 01:52:11.040
<v Speaker 2>The number is a little higher for females versus males because the</v>

01:52:11.040 --> 01:52:14.480
<v Speaker 2>X chromosome is larger than the Y, but it's close enough.</v>

01:52:14.480 --> 01:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a little higher than six billion.</v>

01:52:16.960 --> 01:52:22.240
<v Speaker 2>So let's say we have these six billion base pairs.</v>

01:52:22.240 --> 01:52:27.200
<v Speaker 2>The claim is that Earth is four point five billion years old,</v>

01:52:27.200 --> 01:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and again we'll give them even the amount of time necessary for</v>

01:52:30.480 --> 01:52:34.320
<v Speaker 2>it to cool from a molten state will give them those hundreds</v>

01:52:34.320 --> 01:52:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of millions of years whatever it happens to be.</v>

01:52:37.920 --> 01:52:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Some of you will undoubtedly already see a problem here.</v>

01:52:41.600 --> 01:52:44.800
<v Speaker 2>You need to have a correct, which is to say a human</v>

01:52:45.040 --> 01:52:51.760
<v Speaker 2>word, mutation, more than every single year, for the entire existence of</v>

01:52:51.760 --> 01:52:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the planet, in order to get from nothing to a human being.</v>

01:52:58.080 --> 01:53:02.320
<v Speaker 2>This becomes a very serious problem when you start taking into account,</v>

01:53:02.320 --> 01:53:07.680
<v Speaker 2>well, higher life forms have gestational periods.</v>

01:53:07.680 --> 01:53:10.800
<v Speaker 2>And not every mutation is in the right direction.</v>

01:53:10.800 --> 01:53:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Some mutations, in fact, most mutations, are deleterious.</v>

01:53:14.160 --> 01:53:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Some mutations result in death.</v>

01:53:16.240 --> 01:53:21.040
<v Speaker 2>There's war and famine and accident, misadventure.</v>

01:53:21.440 --> 01:53:25.600
<v Speaker 2>The mathematics simply does not work.</v>

01:53:25.600 --> 01:53:28.960
<v Speaker 2>But let's look at some concrete numbers here so we can get</v>

01:53:28.960 --> 01:53:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a better idea of what is going on here in probability.</v>

01:53:35.200 --> 01:53:41.760
<v Speaker 2>When you speak of probability for things like this, and I will</v>

01:53:42.400 --> 01:53:45.360
<v Speaker 2>link an article that deals with this.</v>

01:53:45.360 --> 01:53:49.680
<v Speaker 2>It actually deals with copying and pasting passwords of all things, but</v>

01:53:49.680 --> 01:53:51.120
<v Speaker 2>it gives the math for this.</v>

01:53:51.120 --> 01:53:55.360
<v Speaker 2>It's an article I wrote some years ago.</v>

01:53:55.360 --> 01:53:57.680
<v Speaker 2>But the relevant numbers are</v>

01:53:58.720 --> 01:54:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the number of characters</v>

01:54:02.240 --> 01:54:05.600
<v Speaker 2>in your pool, which is to say the distinct characters, and then</v>

01:54:05.600 --> 01:54:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the number of characters for we'll call it a word.</v>

01:54:09.920 --> 01:54:13.680
<v Speaker 2>For the word you need to create.</v>

01:54:13.680 --> 01:54:18.240
<v Speaker 2>You need to arise, in this case by random chance.</v>

01:54:18.240 --> 01:54:23.200
<v Speaker 2>And so for the alphabet, you have twenty-six characters.</v>

01:54:23.200 --> 01:54:28.960
<v Speaker 2>For a one character word, that means if you do random chance,</v>

01:54:28.960 --> 01:54:33.440
<v Speaker 2>roll a twenty six sided die, say you have a one in</v>

01:54:33.440 --> 01:54:35.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty six chance.</v>

01:54:35.280 --> 01:54:42.160
<v Speaker 2>If you do this every hour, you'll probably wind up getting the</v>

01:54:42.160 --> 01:54:46.240
<v Speaker 2>letter you want in just over a day.</v>

01:54:46.240 --> 01:54:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't take very much time.</v>

01:54:48.480 --> 01:54:51.920
<v Speaker 2>The same thing is true if you deal with the alphabet and</v>

01:54:51.920 --> 01:54:55.040
<v Speaker 2>basic punctuation, in this case, I'm just going to say space and</v>

01:54:55.040 --> 01:54:57.920
<v Speaker 2>period because that's what you need for just a basic sentence.</v>

01:54:57.920 --> 01:55:01.280
<v Speaker 2>But of course that's not complete yet, is it?</v>

01:55:01.280 --> 01:55:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I've only included lowercase.</v>

01:55:03.360 --> 01:55:05.680
<v Speaker 2>We have to include uppercase, so fifty-four characters.</v>

01:55:06.560 --> 01:55:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Now it takes about two days of rolling that die.</v>

01:55:10.960 --> 01:55:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Now a you know fifty four sided die, but rolling that die</v>

01:55:15.200 --> 01:55:19.600
<v Speaker 2>every hour to get that one character word that you need.</v>

01:55:21.040 --> 01:55:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's bump that up a little bit to five.</v>

01:55:25.440 --> 01:55:27.440
<v Speaker 2>A five character word.</v>

01:55:27.440 --> 01:55:34.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll stick with our upper and lowercase and basic punctuation character set.</v>

01:55:34.720 --> 01:55:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Well now the odds instead of being one in fifty four are</v>

01:55:40.560 --> 01:55:43.840
<v Speaker 2>one in four hundred and fifty nine million one hundred and sixty</v>

01:55:43.840 --> 01:55:46.960
<v Speaker 2>five thousand and twenty four.</v>

01:55:46.960 --> 01:55:49.920
<v Speaker 2>It's now going to take you fifty two thousand four hundred and</v>

01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:55.920
<v Speaker 2>sixteen years to get that string.</v>

01:55:55.920 --> 01:56:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's again bump things up just a little bit.</v>

01:56:00.160 --> 01:56:03.520
<v Speaker 2>In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.</v>

01:56:03.520 --> 01:56:07.920
<v Speaker 2>That's fifty six characters in our character set.</v>

01:56:07.920 --> 01:56:12.880
<v Speaker 2>How long would it take us rolling that die once every hour</v>

01:56:13.200 --> 01:56:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to arrive at that string?</v>

01:56:16.800 --> 01:56:20.640
<v Speaker 2>And the answer is one point one seven nine times ten to</v>

01:56:20.640 --> 01:56:23.840
<v Speaker 2>the ninety third years.</v>

01:56:23.840 --> 01:56:24.880
<v Speaker 2>That's an incomprehensible</v>

01:56:25.760 --> 01:56:29.920
<v Speaker 2>number. But in order to put it a little bit more in</v>

01:56:29.920 --> 01:56:33.680
<v Speaker 2>context, not entirely, because once you start getting into exponents that large,</v>

01:56:33.680 --> 01:56:36.480
<v Speaker 2>it's very difficult to grasp them.</v>

01:56:36.480 --> 01:56:40.080
<v Speaker 2>The number of atoms in the universe is estimated to be ten</v>

01:56:40.160 --> 01:56:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to the eighty second.</v>

01:56:43.040 --> 01:56:46.800
<v Speaker 2>It would take you more years to create that simple string by</v>

01:56:46.800 --> 01:56:52.640
<v Speaker 2>chance than there are atoms in the universe.</v>

01:56:52.640 --> 01:56:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Which is really just a long and complicated way of saying it</v>

01:56:55.920 --> 01:56:58.960
<v Speaker 2>is mathematically impossible.</v>

01:56:58.960 --> 01:57:03.840
<v Speaker 2>You will never get a human being by random chance, no matter</v>

01:57:03.840 --> 01:57:07.440
<v Speaker 2>how much time you give the evolutionist, and the problem for the</v>

01:57:07.440 --> 01:57:12.160
<v Speaker 2>evolutionist is that he only has about four billion years.</v>

01:57:12.160 --> 01:57:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Which sounds like a very long time.</v>

01:57:14.800 --> 01:57:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Until you actually run the numbers, and then suddenly it doesn't work</v>

01:57:19.440 --> 01:57:25.920
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever. And so I come to the last point that I want</v>

01:57:25.920 --> 01:57:29.280
<v Speaker 2>to make in this section.</v>

01:57:29.520 --> 01:57:32.000
<v Speaker 2>And this is a point that is a little different from the</v>

01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:35.360
<v Speaker 2>others. And the reason I want to make this point is that</v>

01:57:35.360 --> 01:57:37.760
<v Speaker 2>it is important for you to understand</v>

01:57:38.640 --> 01:57:41.520
<v Speaker 2>this specific point that I'm going to make, because in the years</v>

01:57:41.520 --> 01:57:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to come, it is going to become highly relevant to the Christian.</v>

01:57:46.240 --> 01:57:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, as mentioned earlier, there are irreducibly complex systems.</v>

01:57:50.880 --> 01:57:55.440
<v Speaker 2>There is no explanation for how you could go from something that</v>

01:57:55.440 --> 01:57:59.840
<v Speaker 2>does not have blood that clots, to a creature that has the</v>

01:57:59.840 --> 01:58:04.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of clotting capabilities that a mammal does, that a human being</v>

01:58:04.160 --> 01:58:10.240
<v Speaker 2>has. There is no way to explain that.</v>

01:58:10.240 --> 01:58:15.040
<v Speaker 2>We cannot get from the non existence of the system or some</v>

01:58:15.040 --> 01:58:20.800
<v Speaker 2>supposed simple version biochemically up to the complicated system that we have</v>

01:58:20.800 --> 01:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>today, the one that we see, the one that exists that must</v>

01:58:23.440 --> 01:58:26.960
<v Speaker 2>be explained by evolution if evolution is true.</v>

01:58:26.960 --> 01:58:30.800
<v Speaker 2>And here's the problem.</v>

01:58:30.800 --> 01:58:36.480
<v Speaker 2>In probably not too many years, we will see scientists devising so-called</v>

01:58:36.480 --> 01:58:41.040
<v Speaker 2>AI experiments to get from point A to point B, which is</v>

01:58:41.040 --> 01:58:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to say, to get from nothing to get to the complex system.</v>

01:58:45.200 --> 01:58:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And they will say, Well, look, the system found a path.</v>

01:58:49.600 --> 01:58:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The problem with this is that it will be impossible to replicate</v>

01:58:54.160 --> 01:59:00.080
<v Speaker 2>that properly, to analyze it whatsoever, and it will prove nothing, and</v>

01:59:00.080 --> 01:59:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the reason that it will prove nothing is that the scientist will</v>

01:59:04.240 --> 01:59:09.120
<v Speaker 2>have set the conditions for the experiment, and then the AI will</v>

01:59:09.120 --> 01:59:14.320
<v Speaker 2>have modified them undoubtedly, but the result will not be falsifiable.</v>

01:59:14.320 --> 01:59:15.840
<v Speaker 2>The result will not be science.</v>

01:59:15.840 --> 01:59:18.400
<v Speaker 2>The result will be pure speculation.</v>

01:59:18.400 --> 01:59:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But they will try to use this to say, look, we have</v>

01:59:21.280 --> 01:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>proved that evolution is true, and they will have proved no such</v>

01:59:24.800 --> 01:59:29.360
<v Speaker 2>thing. It is vitally important to understand the game that they are</v>

01:59:29.360 --> 01:59:32.960
<v Speaker 2>going to play, because this is going to happen, and it will</v>

01:59:32.960 --> 01:59:35.120
<v Speaker 2>not be that long before they start doing it.</v>

01:59:35.120 --> 01:59:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Some of them are probably already trying.</v>

01:59:39.120 --> 01:59:42.400
<v Speaker 2>But there will be papers published that will say we have explained</v>

01:59:42.400 --> 01:59:44.480
<v Speaker 2>how blood clotting occurs.</v>

01:59:44.480 --> 01:59:49.840
<v Speaker 2>This supposedly irreducibly complex system that we couldn't explain in the context</v>

01:59:49.840 --> 01:59:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of Neo Darwinian evolution, we have shown conclusively with AI that it's</v>

01:59:54.160 --> 01:59:58.400
<v Speaker 2>possible. But again they will have shown no such thing.</v>

01:59:58.400 --> 02:00:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Because all they will have done is shown that if a scientist</v>

02:00:02.400 --> 02:00:06.880
<v Speaker 2>tells an AI to get from A to B, the AI will</v>

02:00:06.880 --> 02:00:09.840
<v Speaker 2>spit out something that supposedly gets from A to B.</v>

02:00:09.840 --> 02:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>There will be no way to prove that that is true, there</v>

02:00:12.720 --> 02:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>will be no way to falsify it, there will be no way</v>

02:00:15.440 --> 02:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to analyze it, subject to the very terms that science sets for</v>

02:00:18.880 --> 02:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>itself, or any other terms, quite frankly.</v>

02:00:22.000 --> 02:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>But this is something that is coming down the pipeline, and it</v>

02:00:25.120 --> 02:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>will be used against Christians.</v>

02:00:27.440 --> 02:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It is a weapon from Satan, like much of the rest of</v>

02:00:30.480 --> 02:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>AI, even if AI has certain promise in some areas, I think</v>

02:00:34.080 --> 02:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>personally, it is dangerous to the point that we should ban it.</v>

02:00:39.280 --> 02:00:42.880
<v Speaker 2>This is something that Satan will use against the Christian faith, and</v>

02:00:42.880 --> 02:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Christians have to be on guard against this.</v>

02:00:47.120 --> 02:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>We live in an era where there are going to be novel</v>

02:00:49.680 --> 02:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>challenges to the Christian faith, but at the same time they aren't</v>

02:00:54.080 --> 02:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>novel. Because it's just Satan sewing doubt.</v>

02:00:57.600 --> 02:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>It's what he's been doing all along.</v>

02:00:59.520 --> 02:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>He just happens to have a new and shiny tool.</v>

02:01:04.240 --> 02:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to believe the evolutionists when they hand wave away</v>

02:01:08.800 --> 02:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>problems by ignoring them.</v>

02:01:10.640 --> 02:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to believe the evolutionists when they conflate the morphological,</v>

02:01:15.040 --> 02:01:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the conceptual and the biochemical.</v>

02:01:17.040 --> 02:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to believe the evolutionists when they hand wave away</v>

02:01:20.800 --> 02:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>irreducible complexity.</v>

02:01:22.480 --> 02:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>There's no reason to believe the evolutionist when they say that chirality,</v>

02:01:26.240 --> 02:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>oh that doesn't matter, life could have arisen in some other way.</v>

02:01:30.400 --> 02:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>And there is no reason to believe them when in the not</v>

02:01:33.280 --> 02:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>too distant future they come out and say, Well AI has proved.</v>

02:01:36.640 --> 02:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>No it hasn't.</v>

02:01:38.160 --> 02:01:39.680
<v Speaker 2>They're just lying.</v>

02:01:39.680 --> 02:01:43.760
<v Speaker 2>As they've been doing all along.</v>

02:01:43.760 --> 02:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>So we started this episode with five questions, and we didn't go</v>

02:01:49.680 --> 02:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>into all of them in depth because some of them are</v>

02:01:52.800 --> 02:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>really beyond the scope of this episode.</v>

02:01:55.600 --> 02:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we delved into the philosophy, but really only insofar as it</v>

02:02:00.880 --> 02:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>directly touches on the question of evolution, which is</v>

02:02:04.080 --> 02:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the topic proper of this episode.</v>

02:02:06.800 --> 02:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into the others in some future episode.</v>

02:02:10.560 --> 02:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>But the takeaway for the Christian, really.</v>

02:02:14.880 --> 02:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>It isn't all the scientific information presented.</v>

02:02:18.560 --> 02:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>It isn't the scientific information that will be in the show notes,</v>

02:02:23.280 --> 02:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>where you can get further detail on many of these subjects in</v>

02:02:28.960 --> 02:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>really as much depth as you'd like.</v>

02:02:30.800 --> 02:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>You could very well get a PhD in many of these, if</v>

02:02:33.600 --> 02:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you were so inclined.</v>

02:02:35.200 --> 02:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I personally am not.</v>

02:02:38.400 --> 02:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>That's not the point.</v>

02:02:40.000 --> 02:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>The takeaway of this episode Episode</v>

02:02:43.520 --> 02:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>is really that you can choose between what God says and what</v>

02:02:49.680 --> 02:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>godless scientists tell you to believe.</v>

02:02:55.280 --> 02:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>And many come to this from the exact wrong side.</v>

02:03:02.480 --> 02:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They come at the question as if we should look at it</v>

02:03:08.800 --> 02:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>from the way that really the evolutionists tell us we should.</v>

02:03:13.440 --> 02:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Look at all of these little shiny things we've collected and built</v>

02:03:18.000 --> 02:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>up this system by expanding</v>

02:03:20.400 --> 02:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>God. Because again, that's what they do.</v>

02:03:23.520 --> 02:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>They exclude God just as one of their preconditions, their presuppositions, they</v>

02:03:29.200 --> 02:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>say there is no God.</v>

02:03:31.600 --> 02:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>That is the exact wrong way to look at this.</v>

02:03:36.320 --> 02:03:40.080
<v Speaker 2>The way a Christian should look at these matters is if there</v>

02:03:40.080 --> 02:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is a God.</v>

02:03:41.600 --> 02:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the first question.</v>

02:03:43.200 --> 02:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Is there a God?</v>

02:03:44.320 --> 02:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>If there is a God, then you look to the nature of</v>

02:03:50.000 --> 02:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that god.</v>

02:03:50.960 --> 02:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>You look to what that god has said.</v>

02:03:53.600 --> 02:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Has he spoken to you?</v>

02:03:54.640 --> 02:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>What has he told you?</v>

02:03:57.360 --> 02:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And so as a Christian, first and foremost you trust God.</v>

02:04:02.640 --> 02:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>And so when you look to God's Word, you aren't looking to</v>

02:04:05.360 --> 02:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>God's Word to find ways that it disagrees with science or ways</v>

02:04:09.440 --> 02:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>science disagrees with God's Word.</v>

02:04:11.840 --> 02:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Because God is the fundamental foundation of truth.</v>

02:04:15.920 --> 02:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>And God is the fundamental foundation of truth will never lie.</v>

02:04:20.480 --> 02:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>God is always true.</v>

02:04:22.400 --> 02:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything he says is true.</v>

02:04:24.000 --> 02:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything he says is reliable.</v>

02:04:26.000 --> 02:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And so we know</v>

02:04:27.680 --> 02:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>as a matter of fact, as an absolute fact, that God's word</v>

02:04:32.400 --> 02:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is true.</v>

02:04:33.120 --> 02:04:36.720
<v Speaker 2>And so you look to God's word, and it is not God's</v>

02:04:36.720 --> 02:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>word that we subject to science, it is science that we subject</v>

02:04:40.240 --> 02:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to God's word.</v>

02:04:41.360 --> 02:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>If the scientists come to a conclusion that is contrary to Scripture,</v>

02:04:45.520 --> 02:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>there are two possibilities.</v>

02:04:48.160 --> 02:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>One, we have misinterpreted it, that is entirely possible.</v>

02:04:53.120 --> 02:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Not with regard to things that are clear.</v>

02:04:55.840 --> 02:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So the six days of creation literal days, very clear.</v>

02:05:00.400 --> 02:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Science, in so far as science supposedly disagrees, is wrong.</v>

02:05:06.000 --> 02:05:09.600
<v Speaker 2>But the other alternative is just that, that the scientists are in</v>

02:05:09.600 --> 02:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>fact wrong.</v>

02:05:11.440 --> 02:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>And so if the scientists say that scripture says X and the</v>

02:05:14.400 --> 02:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>scientists claim not X, we as Christians are bound to believe X,</v>

02:05:19.040 --> 02:05:20.400
<v Speaker 2>and the scientists are wrong.</v>

02:05:20.400 --> 02:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Now we can investigate with the tools that science uses to prove</v>

02:05:24.880 --> 02:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the scientists are wrong.</v>

02:05:26.000 --> 02:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>There are many great Christian scientists who have done this, particularly when</v>

02:05:29.760 --> 02:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to genetics, or when it comes to high level, say</v>

02:05:33.680 --> 02:05:35.920
<v Speaker 2>synthetic chemistry.</v>

02:05:35.920 --> 02:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Those sorts of fields tend to find men who don't believe in</v>

02:05:40.720 --> 02:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the dogma of Neo Darwinian evolution.</v>

02:05:44.080 --> 02:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Because it does not square with what they know about the world.</v>

02:05:48.640 --> 02:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Now you'll find some biologists who believe it, because they hand wave</v>

02:05:52.240 --> 02:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>away the chemistry problems, the math problems, these problems, about which the</v>

02:05:56.080 --> 02:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>biologist doesn't know that much.</v>

02:06:00.880 --> 02:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>But Christians can very well investigate these problems, can delve into them,</v>

02:06:05.920 --> 02:06:09.200
<v Speaker 2>can find ways in which they clearly agree with Scripture.</v>

02:06:09.200 --> 02:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>We've gone over those in this episode on a number of topics.</v>

02:06:14.320 --> 02:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>There are many more we could have addressed.</v>

02:06:16.320 --> 02:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>We did not address everything because we didn't want the episode to</v>

02:06:18.960 --> 02:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>run for sixty hours.</v>

02:06:24.240 --> 02:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>But that fundamental takeaway is what it is vitally important, what we</v>

02:06:28.960 --> 02:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>want you to hear in this episode, what we want you to</v>

02:06:32.000 --> 02:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>remember from this episode, you can remember or forget the science as</v>

02:06:36.720 --> 02:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>is useful to you in your life.</v>

02:06:39.200 --> 02:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's useful to have a basic understanding of some of this stuff.</v>

02:06:43.440 --> 02:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>You probably don't need to remember all of the various compounds that</v>

02:06:47.840 --> 02:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>are involved in the cascade that is blood clotting.</v>

02:06:50.640 --> 02:06:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember them all.</v>

02:06:51.680 --> 02:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I have them written down, that's why I could read them.</v>

02:06:56.080 --> 02:06:58.160
<v Speaker 2>But fundamentally, take away and remember</v>

02:06:59.120 --> 02:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that God is true and what he says is reliable, and so</v>

02:07:02.560 --> 02:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>we come at it from almost the exact opposite direction of the</v>

02:07:06.640 --> 02:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>scientists. The scientists assume there is no God, and then try to</v>

02:07:11.280 --> 02:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>explain his creation, which of course is an insane proposition.</v>

02:07:16.320 --> 02:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It is impossible.</v>

02:07:19.440 --> 02:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>We as Christians come at it from the exact opposite direction.</v>

02:07:24.240 --> 02:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>We know there is a God, and so we look at creation</v>

02:07:27.680 --> 02:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>through that lens, and we see his action in creation, we see</v>

02:07:31.520 --> 02:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>his design in creation.</v>

02:07:33.440 --> 02:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>We see creation as something that was built by an intelligent God</v>

02:07:39.760 --> 02:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Not as a clock from which he walked away after he spun</v>

02:07:43.440 --> 02:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>it up, not what the deist claim, but as a god who</v>

02:07:47.040 --> 02:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>is actively involved in creation, who is responsible for every cell division,</v>

02:07:51.920 --> 02:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>every coming together or separation of atoms or molecules or what have</v>

02:07:57.120 --> 02:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you, every last thing that happens in creation happens because God created</v>

02:08:04.000 --> 02:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>it that way and permits it to happen or causes it to</v>

02:08:07.440 --> 02:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>happen. Our God is an awesome God, who is in charge of</v>

02:08:14.080 --> 02:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>all things, who is king over creation, who is in charge of</v>

02:08:20.160 --> 02:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>all things, who mediates all things, as Scripture says, in whom we</v>

02:08:25.520 --> 02:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>live and move and have our being.</v>

02:08:30.560 --> 02:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And so contrary to what the scientists, the evolutionists would claim, belief</v>

02:08:36.240 --> 02:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>in God doesn't cripple the mind.</v>

02:08:38.640 --> 02:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Belief in God doesn't preclude you from answering these questions.</v>

02:08:42.480 --> 02:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Rather, belief in God is the only thing that enables giving an</v>

02:08:46.400 --> 02:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>accurate answer, that enables you to give a true answer.</v>

02:08:50.640 --> 02:08:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Because if you're the evolutionist, we went through a list of things</v>

02:08:54.560 --> 02:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>you simply cannot answer.</v>

02:08:57.440 --> 02:09:02.960
<v Speaker 2>All of the questions with which we started this episode have answers</v>

02:09:02.960 --> 02:09:04.800
<v Speaker 2>for the Christian.</v>

02:09:04.800 --> 02:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Not one of them is answerable for the evolutionist</v>

02:09:09.600 --> 02:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>This is one of their key arguments, one of their key dogmas,</v>

02:09:13.440 --> 02:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>particularly when you get into the philosophy of science.</v>

02:09:16.800 --> 02:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>The explanatory power of a theory, of a belief, what have you,</v>

02:09:22.640 --> 02:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>matters matters.</v>

02:09:24.960 --> 02:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>If something has no explanatory power, then it's false.</v>

02:09:29.680 --> 02:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>What use is it?</v>

02:09:31.520 --> 02:09:35.120
<v Speaker 2>If you came up with a theory that explained absolutely nothing.</v>

02:09:35.120 --> 02:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>At the absolute best that theory is irrelevant.</v>

02:09:38.720 --> 02:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>If on the other hand, you have a theory that explains everything,</v>

02:09:42.400 --> 02:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that theory is extremely powerful, that theory is very relevant, that theory</v>

02:09:46.320 --> 02:09:48.080
<v Speaker 2>is true.</v>

02:09:48.960 --> 02:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>God explains, God gives an answer to each one of these questions.</v>

02:09:54.000 --> 02:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Evolution answers not one of them.</v>

02:09:57.360 --> 02:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Evolution has no explanatory power.</v>

02:09:59.920 --> 02:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>God has infinite explanatory power.</v>

02:10:02.720 --> 02:10:07.360
<v Speaker 2>And no it's not the god of the gaps that certain neo</v>

02:10:07.360 --> 02:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>atheists, certain new atheists attempt to argue.</v>

02:10:11.360 --> 02:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Because each one of those questions is a key question, is a</v>

02:10:15.840 --> 02:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>vitally important question, is a question that has relevant to your life</v>

02:10:19.600 --> 02:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and the life of everyone else who ever has or ever will</v>

02:10:22.320 --> 02:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>live. Because of course it's important to know why is there anything</v>

02:10:27.040 --> 02:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>instead of nothing?</v>

02:10:28.640 --> 02:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>How is there immaterial and not just material?</v>

02:10:31.520 --> 02:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>How is there life and not just matter?</v>

02:10:33.920 --> 02:10:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Why is there intelligent life?</v>

02:10:35.200 --> 02:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Why is there sapient life?</v>

02:10:36.400 --> 02:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Why do humans exist?</v>

02:10:37.600 --> 02:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Why are we self aware?</v>

02:10:39.040 --> 02:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>How are we self aware?</v>

02:10:40.640 --> 02:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean to have qualia?</v>

02:10:42.800 --> 02:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>All of these things are answerable for the Christian, and these are</v>

02:10:46.480 --> 02:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>key matters of life.</v>

02:10:50.240 --> 02:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Why believe in a theory that cannot answer</v>

02:10:53.200 --> 02:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>any of these?</v>

02:10:54.880 --> 02:10:57.600
<v Speaker 2>These aren't little gaps in knowledge.</v>

02:10:57.600 --> 02:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>These are fundamental gaping chasms in human knowledge that science can never</v>

02:11:03.280 --> 02:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>fill</v>

02:11:05.120 --> 02:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>And yet, for the Christian, we know the answer to each and</v>

02:11:08.400 --> 02:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>every one.</v>

02:11:09.440 --> 02:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>The answer ultimately is God.</v>

02:11:12.000 --> 02:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>But there are, of course, answers leading up to that.</v>

02:11:15.280 --> 02:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I can give a concrete, firm answer to each one of those,</v>

02:11:18.160 --> 02:11:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and undoubtedly we will do that.</v>

02:11:21.440 --> 02:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>But the takeaway for the Christian, again, is that we come to</v>

02:11:26.160 --> 02:11:31.840
<v Speaker 2>these problems knowing that God exists, and therefore, there is an answer,</v>

02:11:31.840 --> 02:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>there is a true answer, there is a right answer, and that</v>

02:11:35.040 --> 02:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>answer is grounded in God as Creator.</v>

02:11:39.120 --> 02:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>As we confess in the first article of the Creed.</v>

02:11:42.880 --> 02:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I believe in God the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth.</v>

02:11:49.280 --> 02:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>God is the creator of all things, He is the foundation of</v>

02:11:53.280 --> 02:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>all things.</v>

02:11:55.440 --> 02:11:57.680
<v Speaker 2>He is the explanation.</v>

02:11:57.680 --> 02:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>And as Christians, that means we have the only true answer.</v>

02:12:02.960 --> 02:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>The scientists ultimately have nothing.</v>