WEBVTT

00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Recently I've started taking a break from Twitter on Sundays.</v>

00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Really starting sometime on Saturday, Saturday afternoon, Saturday evening.</v>

00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, this past week, Saturday, I posted a tweet before</v>

00:00:16.640 --> 00:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>taking my sabbatical, as it were.</v>

00:00:20.240 --> 00:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And that tweet blew up.</v>

00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It got a lot of views.</v>

00:00:24.160 --> 00:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I want to explain specifically what it is I mean by</v>

00:00:30.080 --> 00:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that tweet and why it is correct, why it is in line</v>

00:00:35.600 --> 00:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with right Christian doctrine</v>

00:00:38.240 --> 00:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and for reference the tweet verbatim interracial marriage is tantamount to murder.</v>

00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it is important to note several things, and so I'm going</v>

00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to go through</v>

00:00:52.960 --> 00:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>really four major points in this particular episode.</v>

00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>To start off, we need to distinguish per se and per quote.</v>

00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I've distinguished this before elsewhere in, for example, the there's a</v>

00:01:11.360 --> 00:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>stone choir episode in which I distinguished per se from per quote,</v>

00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but just to go over it again briefly, something that is per</v>

00:01:20.240 --> 00:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>se x is x intrinsically.</v>

00:01:24.160 --> 00:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Something that is per quote x is x due to Other circumstances</v>

00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>due to other facts.</v>

00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it is important, it is vitally important to note at the outset</v>

00:01:39.440 --> 00:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that interracial marriage is not per se sinful.</v>

00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And so of course that means that it is not per se</v>

00:01:48.080 --> 00:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>tantamount to murder.</v>

00:01:50.800 --> 00:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>The issue is per quote.</v>

00:01:53.760 --> 00:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The issue is that given external circumstances, given the surrounding facts, it</v>

00:02:00.080 --> 00:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is in fact sinful.</v>

00:02:01.520 --> 00:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It is, as I said in my tweet, tantamount to murder.</v>

00:02:08.880 --> 00:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>The children that are produced from an interracial union are in fact</v>

00:02:14.160 --> 00:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not related to their own parents.</v>

00:02:17.040 --> 00:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Now it is important to distinguish two senses in which we mean</v>

00:02:21.600 --> 00:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>related here, because obviously I am using one, and if I were</v>

00:02:25.760 --> 00:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>using the other, it would not be true.</v>

00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if two people of a dip of different races have a</v>

00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>child, that child</v>

00:02:35.200 --> 00:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is descended from them, and therefore is related to them in the</v>

00:02:39.200 --> 00:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of being descended from them, but biologically, genetically, according to the</v>

00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>DNA of that child, that child is so so far distant from</v>

00:02:50.560 --> 00:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>his parents, that in fact the parents are more closely related to</v>

00:02:56.320 --> 00:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>any random member of their own race, of their own nation, than</v>

00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to their own child</v>

00:03:03.360 --> 00:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'll get into near the end of this episode why that</v>

00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is important, some of the consequences of that, and what to do</v>

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about those consequences.</v>

00:03:13.600 --> 00:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But in addition</v>

00:03:15.760 --> 00:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that the child is effectively not related to his</v>

00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>own parents, which carries a lot of problems with it.</v>

00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>There are also health consequences.</v>

00:03:27.040 --> 00:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Many times those who are born of particularly distant genetic stock, so</v>

00:03:33.920 --> 00:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>parents who are less closely related, this is not going to be</v>

00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>something that applies to say say a German and a Dutchman or</v>

00:03:42.880 --> 00:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a Dutch woman and a German or a German and a Russian</v>

00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>even, which is to say people descended from J Fith, Europeans, whites,</v>

00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's within one of the overarching ethnic groups, being, of course, the</v>

00:03:57.920 --> 00:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Japhethites, the Hamites, and the Shemites.</v>

00:04:00.960 --> 00:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>No, this is something more distant, if you have a European and</v>

00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>an African, there are going to be health consequences of that union.</v>

00:04:08.800 --> 00:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The child is going to be less healthy.</v>

00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>The child is going to have more problems than if he did</v>

00:04:16.240 --> 00:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>not have such disparate lineage.</v>

00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course this creates problems for medical care, because the child</v>

00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to require more medical care for one, and it is</v>

00:04:29.280 --> 00:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be more difficult to render that medical care.</v>

00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Because we have</v>

00:04:35.200 --> 00:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>routines, we have various things set up for those of particular lineage.</v>

00:04:41.440 --> 00:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Because yes, you do actually have to tailor medicine to the genetics,</v>

00:04:45.200 --> 00:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to the lineage, to the DNA, really is what you're doing, the</v>

00:04:48.080 --> 00:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>biology, of the patient in some cases.</v>

00:04:50.960 --> 00:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It depends on the type of treatment.</v>

00:04:53.840 --> 00:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But to some degree, we have those regimens in place tailored to</v>

00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>particular groups.</v>

00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>If someone is effectively sui generis because that person is a mishmash,</v>

00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a mixture of multiple different groups, we don't have those in place.</v>

00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be more difficult to treat that person.</v>

00:05:14.320 --> 00:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Additionally, there are going to be things where you cannot treat that</v>

00:05:17.680 --> 00:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>person. So, organ donation, tissue donation, if you try to get a</v>

00:05:21.120 --> 00:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>bone marrow donation and you are half black and half white, good</v>

00:05:25.840 --> 00:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>luck. You probably will not be able to find a compatible donor,</v>

00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and that is a serious consequence.</v>

00:05:31.120 --> 00:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That is something parents should take into account because they are putting</v>

00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that on the child.</v>

00:05:36.320 --> 00:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Parents are supposed to care for their children, not burden them unnecessarily,</v>

00:05:40.640 --> 00:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is most certainly an unnecessary burden.</v>

00:05:45.120 --> 00:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Additionally, for the child, outside of the biological issues, you have the</v>

00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>cultural issues Issues.</v>

00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>This child is not going to belong to any one particular culture,</v>

00:05:57.680 --> 00:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>because the child is going to be torn between at least two.</v>

00:06:01.760 --> 00:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be the father's culture versus the mother's culture, and</v>

00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something those parents have put on that child.</v>

00:06:07.840 --> 00:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a problem for the child.</v>

00:06:10.400 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>That is a consideration.</v>

00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Because again, parents are supposed to care for their children, and in</v>

00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the same vein, the divorce statistics for interracial marriage are significantly worse</v>

00:06:23.760 --> 00:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>than those for intracial marriage, which is to say if you marry</v>

00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>someone outside your own race, you are much more likely to get</v>

00:06:30.960 --> 00:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>divorced. Again, this is going to severely impact the child.</v>

00:06:35.840 --> 00:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We know the consequences for children, if they are the product of</v>

00:06:40.240 --> 00:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a failed marriage, if their parents divorce.</v>

00:06:43.520 --> 00:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Now add on top the other problems that biracial, multiracial children have,</v>

00:06:48.960 --> 00:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have given this child a significantly harder time in life.</v>

00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>For what reason?</v>

00:06:54.800 --> 00:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Why did you do this to the child?</v>

00:06:58.400 --> 00:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>But of course that is simply the beginning of this problem.</v>

00:07:02.720 --> 00:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at it in the modern context, and then we'll look</v>

00:07:06.480 --> 00:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at it in the biblical context second, because of course that is</v>

00:07:09.440 --> 00:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I am accused of doing is twisting scripture</v>

00:07:13.120 --> 00:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or ignoring scripture, and so we'll address those questions.</v>

00:07:17.520 --> 00:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But in the modern context, we'll deal with that first.</v>

00:07:21.600 --> 00:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>The goal of interracial marriages in the modern context is the destruction</v>

00:07:26.560 --> 00:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of nations.</v>

00:07:27.520 --> 00:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>This is very explicit.</v>

00:07:29.280 --> 00:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Those who are advocating for interracial relationships, multiracial, biracial, whatever it happens</v>

00:07:35.440 --> 00:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to be children, the explicit goal is the destruction of the distinct</v>

00:07:41.840 --> 00:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>nations. In particular the goal, of course, is the destruction of whites,</v>

00:07:46.960 --> 00:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the white race.</v>

00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for this is because historically Christendom has been synonymous</v>

00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with Europe.</v>

00:07:57.600 --> 00:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Whites have been the bulwark of Christendom in the world for millennia.</v>

00:08:02.640 --> 00:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And Satan knows this, and he hates us, and so he wants</v>

00:08:05.200 --> 00:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to erase us, and this is one way that he can do</v>

00:08:07.520 --> 00:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it, a very effective way.</v>

00:08:09.840 --> 00:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Because</v>

00:08:11.920 --> 00:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>an interracial marriage destroys the lineage of both parents.</v>

00:08:18.880 --> 00:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as that child is concerned.</v>

00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, if for instance you have a father from group</v>

00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>A and a mother from Group B, and the child marries into</v>

00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>group B, and then the child's children marry into group B, eventually</v>

00:08:34.240 --> 00:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you wind up genetically basically back in group B</v>

00:08:38.480 --> 00:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just because of the way that genetic recombination and such works.</v>

00:08:42.400 --> 00:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>However, that only works so long as you have a large enough</v>

00:08:46.800 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pool of group B where something like that can be absorbed and</v>

00:08:50.720 --> 00:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>effectively bred out over time.</v>

00:08:53.840 --> 00:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>If you have enough people who are crossing that racial boundary with</v>

00:08:59.280 --> 00:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>their marriages in a short span of time, you destroy one or</v>

00:09:03.840 --> 00:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>both groups involved.</v>

00:09:05.680 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Just depends on the relative size of the groups, basically.</v>

00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>In addition to this overtly evil goal, which many admit this is</v>

00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact their goal, this is what they want to accomplish with</v>

00:09:19.360 --> 00:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>interracial marriage.</v>

00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Many of those who are engaged in interracial marriages admit they are</v>

00:09:25.680 --> 00:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it for wicked reasons.</v>

00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It may be a fetish.</v>

00:09:29.440 --> 00:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It may be they hate their own people.</v>

00:09:31.760 --> 00:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that is sin, that is particularly egregious sin, just according</v>

00:09:37.600 --> 00:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to the plain words of scripture.</v>

00:09:39.520 --> 00:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's also something that is, of course, pushed by our culture and</v>

00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>our media, and as I have often said, as we've often said</v>

00:09:46.480 --> 00:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on Stone Choir as well, look at the origin of an idea</v>

00:09:52.560 --> 00:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or a thing.</v>

00:09:53.520 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Who is pushing it?</v>

00:09:55.200 --> 00:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Why is it being pushed?</v>

00:09:57.040 --> 00:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>If the person or group pushing it is evil, you can rest</v>

00:10:02.720 --> 00:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly assured that the thing itself is also evil.</v>

00:10:05.840 --> 00:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It is aimed at evil ends.</v>

00:10:08.000 --> 00:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Because ultimately, of course, it comes from Satan.</v>

00:10:10.480 --> 00:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, those pushing it are evil.</v>

00:10:15.280 --> 00:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Those who are pushing interracial marriage are by and large atheists, Marxists,</v>

00:10:21.520 --> 00:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>communists. This was a big push from the USSR, in order to</v>

00:10:26.320 --> 00:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>drive tension and destroy the nation.</v>

00:10:29.680 --> 00:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It is carried over into the modern context, of course, and it's</v>

00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>still Marxists who are pushing it.</v>

00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Just a different flavor of Marxist, less the Soviet variety more the</v>

00:10:39.040 --> 00:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankfurt. And as I mentioned, interracial marriage destroys one's race.</v>

00:10:46.080 --> 00:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It is, in fact, a repudiation of one's ancestors</v>

00:10:50.080 --> 00:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of one's parents.</v>

00:10:51.600 --> 00:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And so of course it is a violation of the fourth commandment.</v>

00:10:55.440 --> 00:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the fourth commandment does not extend just to the immediate generation</v>

00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>before you, it's not just your parents.</v>

00:11:02.320 --> 00:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Because of course this can be explained a number of ways.</v>

00:11:06.800 --> 00:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The simplest one for most people to grasp is going to be</v>

00:11:09.760 --> 00:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this. You have a duty to your parents, under the fourth commandment.</v>

00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That is explicit, that is obvious thou shalt honour thy father and</v>

00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>thy mother and of course there's the blessing with it, which plays</v>

00:11:20.560 --> 00:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>into this as well that it may go well with you, and</v>

00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you may live long in the land Or thou mayest live long</v>

00:11:26.800 --> 00:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the land if we want to use the the older English.</v>

00:11:31.600 --> 00:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But of course, you have to look at it generationally.</v>

00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Your parents have a duty to their parents.</v>

00:11:38.080 --> 00:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Their parents have a duty to their parents, and so part of</v>

00:11:41.520 --> 00:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>honoring your parents is recognizing their duty to honor their parents and</v>

00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>therefore honoring your grandparents, partly through your parents, but also directly.</v>

00:11:54.240 --> 00:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Particularly if they're still alive, but also all of those ancestors all</v>

00:11:58.560 --> 00:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the way back.</v>

00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And part of how you do that is continuing the line they</v>

00:12:02.560 --> 00:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have preserved over a course of millennia, not terminating it for some</v>

00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>selfish reason, which it virtually always is in these cases.</v>

00:12:14.080 --> 00:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We could also mention crime statistics, but I've mentioned that elsewhere, gone</v>

00:12:19.360 --> 00:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>over it fairly extensively, I'll link to it in the show notes</v>

00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of going over it here.</v>

00:12:24.880 --> 00:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And so of course mentioning the fourth commandment leads us right into</v>

00:12:28.160 --> 00:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the biblical context.</v>

00:12:31.120 --> 00:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is the one that many</v>

00:12:33.120 --> 00:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have attempted to say that I'm somehow violating with my arguments, that</v>

00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I am ignoring the biblical context or twisting it, what have you.</v>

00:12:42.720 --> 00:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And so let's look at some cases.</v>

00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>We will look at five cases.</v>

00:12:48.560 --> 00:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with Moses.</v>

00:12:50.640 --> 00:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>There are those who argue that Moses was in an interracial marriage,</v>

00:12:56.000 --> 00:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>because he married Zippara, the daughter of the priest of Midian.</v>

00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>What these people fail to mention, and in some cases it may</v>

00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be simply because they're cherry picking or they're looking for something on</v>

00:13:10.160 --> 00:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the internet.</v>

00:13:10.640 --> 00:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>They probably Googled it and don't know anything about scripture.</v>

00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Well the Midianites are descended from Abraham via Ketera.</v>

00:13:19.520 --> 00:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And so the Midianites are cousins of the Israelites, of the Hebrews.</v>

00:13:27.120 --> 00:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>This was a cousin marriage.</v>

00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>This is this is not an interracial marriage.</v>

00:13:31.440 --> 00:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Now there is one other attempt to marry argument in the case</v>

00:13:36.000 --> 00:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of Moses.</v>

00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And they will say that when there was the rebellion with Miriam</v>

00:13:40.560 --> 00:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron, that they said that Moses had married a Cushite, and</v>

00:13:45.280 --> 00:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>therefore that was the reason, this is what the opponents attempt to</v>

00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>argue. Therefore that was the reason they were condemning Moses.</v>

00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you actually read that text, that's not the reason they're</v>

00:13:58.400 --> 00:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>condemning Moses.</v>

00:13:59.600 --> 00:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, they may have brought that up, but the real problem</v>

00:14:02.480 --> 00:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>there is that they were rejecting Moses, who was the chosen of</v>

00:14:06.560 --> 00:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>God, to lead the people of Israel, and therefore in rejecting Moses,</v>

00:14:10.560 --> 00:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they were in fact rejecting God.</v>

00:14:12.080 --> 00:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They were rebelling against God.</v>

00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Because the rebellion is always against God.</v>

00:14:15.920 --> 00:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Against you you only have I sinned.</v>

00:14:18.560 --> 00:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue.</v>

00:14:19.520 --> 00:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The issue was not Moses, and also Kushite in this context probably</v>

00:14:24.240 --> 00:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just means foreign woman from the region of Cush.</v>

00:14:28.400 --> 00:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Cush is to the south, so is Midian.</v>

00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably the same woman, even if it was not the same woman.</v>

00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>The issue was still the rebellion against God, the usurpation, which is</v>

00:14:42.560 --> 00:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>incidentally why you see Miriam is cursed more heavily than Aaron, because</v>

00:14:46.800 --> 00:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for a woman to attempt to usurp that sort of headship, that</v>

00:14:50.640 --> 00:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of leadership, is of course worse than for a man to</v>

00:14:53.520 --> 00:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do so.</v>

00:14:54.080 --> 00:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And Aaron was in fact a leader of the people as well,</v>

00:14:57.280 --> 00:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just not in the same position as Moses.</v>

00:15:00.800 --> 00:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And so scripture doesn't actually say anything about this marriage.</v>

00:15:06.640 --> 00:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't have an explicit approval or condemnation, and so it goes</v>

00:15:11.280 --> 00:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond the text, if either side really wants to draw anything out</v>

00:15:14.960 --> 00:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of this.</v>

00:15:17.440 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The next person we'll address is Rahab.</v>

00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a fundamental problem here, a foundational issue when we are</v>

00:15:26.480 --> 00:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>addressing Rahab, and that is that we don't know if we're dealing</v>

00:15:30.800 --> 00:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with one person or two.</v>

00:15:34.560 --> 00:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>When you translate or transliterate, as the case may be, a name</v>

00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>from one language to another, it is often the case that there</v>

00:15:44.160 --> 00:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>will be multiple spellings, particularly across different authors, and here we have</v>

00:15:50.160 --> 00:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>two different names we have Rab</v>

00:15:54.720 --> 00:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and Rahab and and that is R A B or R A</v>

00:16:01.280 --> 00:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>X A B, just to transliterate the Greek characters as it were.</v>

00:16:06.240 --> 00:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we have with the chi, with the X in Matthew, Rachab</v>

00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but in the Septuagint Old Testament and in Hebrew and James we</v>

00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>have Rab.</v>

00:16:19.680 --> 00:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Is this the same woman?</v>

00:16:21.920 --> 00:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Well we don't know.</v>

00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Scripture does not tell us there's nowhere else we are told if</v>

00:16:27.760 --> 00:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this Rahab, as the name is transliterated into English, is two different</v>

00:16:34.240 --> 00:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>women or one woman.</v>

00:16:36.080 --> 00:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and so Matthew, of course, is giving us the lineage of Christ.</v>

00:16:41.120 --> 00:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>If Raab is Rahab, then we have a Canaanite in the lineage</v>

00:16:47.760 --> 00:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of Christ.</v>

00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But we have no reason to conclude this.</v>

00:16:52.880 --> 00:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>If Scripture told us that, fine.</v>

00:16:55.680 --> 00:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>We can use this argument for whatever purpose as long as it's</v>

00:16:59.520 --> 00:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in line with the text says.</v>

00:17:01.120 --> 00:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The text does not say that that this is the same woman,</v>

00:17:05.600 --> 00:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and so neither side can draw any argument from this, because it</v>

00:17:10.560 --> 00:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond the text.</v>

00:17:12.960 --> 00:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, those who are on the other side are actually relying on</v>

00:17:16.880 --> 00:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Midrashim. They're relying on Jewish sources that supposedly exegete this text or</v>

00:17:22.800 --> 00:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>carry forward some oral tradition.</v>

00:17:25.280 --> 00:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not scripture, that's not binding, Christians should not resort to it.</v>

00:17:31.280 --> 00:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And so Rahab does not give an argument for either side.</v>

00:17:38.320 --> 00:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The next individual in scripture we will address is Ruth.</v>

00:17:42.880 --> 00:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a similar issue to earlier with Moses and Cippra.</v>

00:17:49.600 --> 00:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Ruth was a Moabite.</v>

00:17:52.240 --> 00:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Well the Moabites were descended from Lot.</v>

00:17:55.600 --> 00:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Lot was the nephew of Abraham.</v>

00:17:58.720 --> 00:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Again, cousins.</v>

00:18:01.440 --> 00:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is not an interracial marriage, this is a cousin marriage.</v>

00:18:05.280 --> 00:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And again, it just pays to actually know Scripture, to know the</v>

00:18:08.560 --> 00:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lineage of these people.</v>

00:18:10.240 --> 00:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You cannot make a s a sound argument, you cannot make a</v>

00:18:13.920 --> 00:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>proper argument, if you don't actually know what Scripture says about these</v>

00:18:18.800 --> 00:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>individuals. And so again, Ruth is a cousin.</v>

00:18:24.320 --> 00:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, Joseph.</v>

00:18:27.680 --> 00:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This is one where perhaps we have an interracial marriage.</v>

00:18:32.080 --> 00:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Joseph married Asinath, the daughter of the priest of On.</v>

00:18:40.480 --> 00:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>She may have been a Hamite.</v>

00:18:43.040 --> 00:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>If she was a if she was an Egyptian, then she was</v>

00:18:46.320 --> 00:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a Hamite, because</v>

00:18:49.120 --> 00:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Egypt is a son of Ham.</v>

00:18:51.760 --> 00:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>The Egyptians are sons of Ham.</v>

00:18:54.960 --> 00:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Egypt is called in Scripture the land of Ham.</v>

00:18:59.840 --> 00:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>However, we are not given a lineage of Asinath.</v>

00:19:05.360 --> 00:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>The Egyptians were conquered, at least a couple times in history, perhaps</v>

00:19:09.600 --> 00:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>more than that, by Shemitic peoples.</v>

00:19:14.240 --> 00:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>One in fact was the Hyksos, and that may have played into</v>

00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>why the Pharaoh, who was leader of Egypt at the time of</v>

00:19:22.560 --> 00:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Exodus, hated the Israelites, feared the Israelites, because he may have</v>

00:19:28.800 --> 00:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that if the Hyksos or some other group of Shemitic origin</v>

00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>came in, that the Hebrews, also being Shemitic, would have aligned with</v>

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>them, would have allied with them, and fought against the Egyptians.</v>

00:19:44.160 --> 00:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But of course, some of the leadership, some of the upper echelons</v>

00:19:48.400 --> 00:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of Egyptian society, would have been Shemite descended because of these invasions.</v>

00:19:55.040 --> 00:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The sim similar things happened in various parts of the world over</v>

00:19:59.360 --> 00:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>time. For instance, we know the Normans came in and conquered parts</v>

00:20:03.520 --> 00:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of Britain, and then you have the Anglo Saxons, and you have</v>

00:20:08.320 --> 00:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these various groups that conquer other groups and take over the upper</v>

00:20:11.280 --> 00:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>echelons of society and intermix over time.</v>

00:20:15.120 --> 00:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Now in the case, of course, the European case I gave these</v>

00:20:18.640 --> 00:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are very closely related cousins.</v>

00:20:21.520 --> 00:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>In this case they're a little more distance because you're dealing with</v>

00:20:24.240 --> 00:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Shemites versus Hemites.</v>

00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>However, again, we don't know the lineage of Asinath.</v>

00:20:33.520 --> 00:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And so if either side makes an argument from this, it is</v>

00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>an argument based on assumption, not based on what is explicitly in</v>

00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the text of Scripture.</v>

00:20:44.800 --> 00:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Even if, let's say, let's say that</v>

00:20:49.920 --> 00:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Asanath was indeed a Hamite.</v>

00:20:52.960 --> 00:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is Joseph a Shemite marrying Asinath a Hemite.</v>

00:20:57.360 --> 00:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is a proper interracial marriage, an actual one in Scripture,</v>

00:21:02.400 --> 00:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>if we make this assumption.</v>

00:21:05.280 --> 00:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Does Scripture say that this was a wise union</v>

00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>No. Does Scripture say this was an unwise union?</v>

00:21:12.400 --> 00:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Again, no.</v>

00:21:13.600 --> 00:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Scripture does not pass any judgment on it.</v>

00:21:16.640 --> 00:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Scripture simply relays what happened in this case.</v>

00:21:21.920 --> 00:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:21:23.440 --> 00:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if we want to draw out and say that this was approved</v>

00:21:27.440 --> 00:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of by God, this was blessed in some way, we can say</v>

00:21:30.960 --> 00:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that he did indeed go on to found part of part of</v>

00:21:35.520 --> 00:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a nation, as it were, not a nation unto itself, but a</v>

00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tribe, two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim.</v>

00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we can say that God did bless him.</v>

00:21:46.160 --> 00:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>However, that God blessed him for this does not mean that this</v>

00:21:51.360 --> 00:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>particular union was in and of itself wise.</v>

00:21:55.840 --> 00:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We could look of course to David.</v>

00:21:58.240 --> 00:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Was what he did with Bathsheba wise?</v>

00:22:02.640 --> 00:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I think we can all agree that stealing another man's wife</v>

00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and murdering him is not something we should call wise.</v>

00:22:11.520 --> 00:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Did God still give him</v>

00:22:13.920 --> 00:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>children from Bathsheba?</v>

00:22:15.520 --> 00:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Solomon in particular, who would sit on his throne, who would</v>

00:22:19.600 --> 00:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be in the line of the Messiah.</v>

00:22:21.840 --> 00:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Not everything that is recorded in Scripture is necessarily</v>

00:22:26.800 --> 00:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is wise, something that is praiseworthy.</v>

00:22:30.160 --> 00:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Some things are left to human wisdom, and we have to be</v>

00:22:34.080 --> 00:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>able to make those calls based on the information available to us.</v>

00:22:41.600 --> 00:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This is of course obvious because</v>

00:22:44.960 --> 00:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the most</v>

00:22:46.480 --> 00:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>clear cut case, let's call it.</v>

00:22:49.840 --> 00:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>If a woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape.</v>

00:22:54.800 --> 00:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>We have to contend with the fact that children are a blessing</v>

00:22:57.920 --> 00:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>from God, but this child is very clearly the product of an</v>

00:23:02.240 --> 00:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>evil act.</v>

00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Can we conclude that because God's blessing of children, God's blessing of</v>

00:23:10.240 --> 00:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a child in this case resulted, that the act itself is approved</v>

00:23:14.320 --> 00:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of or blessed by God?</v>

00:23:15.760 --> 00:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The answer of course is no.</v>

00:23:18.080 --> 00:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we have to be careful</v>

00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what sort of conclusions we are drawing from the information, from the</v>

00:23:26.240 --> 00:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>facts relayed by Scripture.</v>

00:23:29.840 --> 00:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And so even if this is a case of an actual</v>

00:23:33.520 --> 00:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>interracial marriage, we are not told by scripture if this is something</v>

00:23:38.560 --> 00:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that is</v>

00:23:40.080 --> 00:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>blessed or cursed, if this is something that is praiseworthy or blameworthy.</v>

00:23:46.800 --> 00:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And even if we go ahead and assume that it is praiseworthy</v>

00:23:51.600 --> 00:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this was a good thing, it does not mean that it's a</v>

00:23:54.720 --> 00:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>general rule.</v>

00:23:56.080 --> 00:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Again, there are matters that are left to human wisdom.</v>

00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And so let's look at really basically the only very clear case</v>

00:24:07.520 --> 00:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of mixed lineage that we have explicitly mixed lineage clearly taught by</v>

00:24:13.520 --> 00:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>scripture, and that of course is Timothy.</v>

00:24:17.520 --> 00:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And per Acts sixteen, Timothy was born of a Jewish or Judean</v>

00:24:24.400 --> 00:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>woman and a Greek father.</v>

00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Now of course we could make the argument that technically it does</v>

00:24:31.120 --> 00:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just say Judean and Greek, and Greek can just mean foreign and</v>

00:24:34.960 --> 00:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Judean can mean living in Judea, but I think it is a</v>

00:24:38.800 --> 00:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fair assumption in this case to go with the interpretation in this</v>

00:24:43.360 --> 00:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>case that Timothy's mother was indeed an Israelite woman, and his father</v>

00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was indeed a Greek in the sense of ethnically racially Greek man.</v>

00:24:54.960 --> 00:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And so again, does Scripture praise this union?</v>

00:24:59.840 --> 00:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>No. Does Scripture curse this union?</v>

00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>No. We're back to my initial comments.</v>

00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Per se not sinful.</v>

00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The issue is per quote.</v>

00:25:11.680 --> 00:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The issue is the surrounding circumstances Circumstances.</v>

00:25:16.320 --> 00:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and in our modern context</v>

00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>interracial marriages are basically always sin.</v>

00:25:24.160 --> 00:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>They are a problem for the reasons mentioned, and I'll get into</v>

00:25:29.120 --> 00:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the consequences now for my last point.</v>

00:25:31.360 --> 00:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We've finished the section on the biblical context as it were.</v>

00:25:35.600 --> 00:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And so let's discuss the actual consequences of interracial marriages.</v>

00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I already discussed the issue, some of the issues regarding children, the</v>

00:25:45.520 --> 00:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>medical consequences, the lack of a real culture, the lack of belonging.</v>

00:25:51.760 --> 00:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But it really is worse than that, because one of the things</v>

00:25:55.680 --> 00:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have to do, according to Scripture, according to the fourth</v>

00:26:00.080 --> 00:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>commandment, is honor our father and mother.</v>

00:26:03.440 --> 00:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, that ex that extends beyond just one's immediate biological mother</v>

00:26:09.840 --> 00:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and father.</v>

00:26:11.600 --> 00:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You are part of a larger culture, you are part of a</v>

00:26:16.400 --> 00:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>nation, and part of honoring your father and mother is honoring that</v>

00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>nation of which you are part.</v>

00:26:24.800 --> 00:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that if you are not really part of</v>

00:26:28.800 --> 00:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>any one nation?</v>

00:26:30.320 --> 00:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>If your parents are from two separate nations, or worse, if your</v>

00:26:35.840 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>grandparents are from three or four separate nations, how do you honor</v>

00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>your nation properly?</v>

00:26:42.400 --> 00:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a nation in a very real sense.</v>

00:26:45.520 --> 00:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is the problem</v>

00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that individuals who enter into an interracial marriage create for their own</v>

00:26:53.040 --> 00:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>children. Because that child will have to choose to win To which</v>

00:26:58.480 --> 00:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>nation he truly belongs.</v>

00:27:00.640 --> 00:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, the ordinary course of things is that a woman</v>

00:27:04.320 --> 00:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>leaves her family and becomes part of the family of her husband,</v>

00:27:07.920 --> 00:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and so the child would choose his father's nation, but that is</v>

00:27:11.520 --> 00:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not how it always plays out in the modern context.</v>

00:27:16.880 --> 00:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And so this is a burden placed by selfish parents onto their</v>

00:27:22.160 --> 00:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>children. And the child has to choose.</v>

00:27:24.800 --> 00:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the reality of it.</v>

00:27:26.720 --> 00:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the recommendation.</v>

00:27:28.640 --> 00:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Because this is the best thing the child can do.</v>

00:27:30.880 --> 00:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>The child has to choose the nation to which he will belong.</v>

00:27:36.240 --> 00:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is a terrible burden to put on a child.</v>

00:27:39.360 --> 00:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Because for anyone who is born to parents of the same nation,</v>

00:27:45.040 --> 00:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to choose your nation because it's your nation.</v>

00:27:48.720 --> 00:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>If both of your parents are German, you're German.</v>

00:27:52.160 --> 00:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>If both of your parents are French, you're French.</v>

00:27:55.120 --> 00:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You aren't having to contend with this additional confusion and burden that</v>

00:28:00.320 --> 00:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>your parents in their selfishness and their short-sightedness have placed on you.</v>

00:28:07.120 --> 00:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But that of course is what society wants to do to these</v>

00:28:09.920 --> 00:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>children, because society wants to create individuals who are rootless, individuals who</v>

00:28:16.160 --> 00:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do not have any connection</v>

00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to their ancestors, to a greater nation, to anything beyond themselves, because</v>

00:28:23.680 --> 00:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>society wants these little atomized individuals who can be shuffled around aboard</v>

00:28:29.280 --> 00:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and used as interchangeable cogs in the great machine that we call</v>

00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalism, in the market.</v>

00:28:36.960 --> 00:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That is what modern society wants.</v>

00:28:39.520 --> 00:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It also wants it because individuals</v>

00:28:43.360 --> 00:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>who have no greater connection to a larger group</v>

00:28:48.160 --> 00:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>will forever be atomized.</v>

00:28:51.280 --> 00:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They will never be able to organize in pursuit of their own</v>

00:28:55.920 --> 00:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>good, of the good of their own group, because they don't have</v>

00:29:00.400 --> 00:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that group.</v>

00:29:01.680 --> 00:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And so those who are in power cannot be challenged by atomized</v>

00:29:07.120 --> 00:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>individuals. They can be challenged by groups who have a shared identity</v>

00:29:11.520 --> 00:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and are willing and able to work toward shared goals.</v>

00:29:16.560 --> 00:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>The best sort of individual</v>

00:29:20.400 --> 00:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that that our modern overlords, let us call them, can have, is</v>

00:29:26.080 --> 00:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>someone of mixed lineage who is also of alternative sexuality, because that</v>

00:29:33.200 --> 00:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>person is totally atomized.</v>

00:29:36.640 --> 00:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>That person does not have the natural connections of family, the natural</v>

00:29:40.480 --> 00:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>connections of race, the natural connections of nationality, none of it.</v>

00:29:46.320 --> 00:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>That is not part of a greater whole, that is an individual,</v>

00:29:51.360 --> 00:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the most terrible sense of the term.</v>

00:29:55.840 --> 00:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And so those who produce children in an interracial marriage are putting</v>

00:30:01.680 --> 00:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this sort of burden onto their children.</v>

00:30:05.200 --> 00:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's sinful.</v>

00:30:06.720 --> 00:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That is not something that Christians should be doing.</v>

00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>That transgresses the wisdom that God has given us to act properly</v>

00:30:15.600 --> 00:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in this life.</v>

00:30:17.280 --> 00:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Just because we can do something does not mean that we should</v>

00:30:21.040 --> 00:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>do that thing.</v>

00:30:22.160 --> 00:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Just because something is not per se sinful does not mean that</v>

00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it is not sinful</v>

00:30:27.360 --> 00:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in context.</v>

00:30:30.160 --> 00:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And so parents who are doing this, individuals who are engaging in</v>

00:30:34.480 --> 00:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this, should not be praised for what they're doing.</v>

00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Because out of their own selfish sinful desires, they are placing zero</v>

00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>emphasis, zero care, zero weight on what will happen to their children</v>

00:30:50.560 --> 00:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future, what this will do to their children, what this</v>

00:30:53.440 --> 00:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>will do to their society.</v>

00:30:55.120 --> 00:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Because of course, this is one of the things that erodes the</v>

00:30:59.520 --> 00:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>bonds in society between and among people.</v>

00:31:03.360 --> 00:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Groups are bound together in part by their common genetics and by</v>

00:31:08.000 --> 00:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>their common history, the common culture, language, all these various things.</v>

00:31:12.880 --> 00:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>That breaks down when an individual no longer has a connection to</v>

00:31:17.280 --> 00:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>these things.</v>

00:31:21.360 --> 00:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And so again, just to emphasize, one of the biggest problems with</v>

00:31:26.800 --> 00:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not actually the sin of the parents.</v>

00:31:32.640 --> 00:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is the sin of the parents that leads to the</v>

00:31:35.520 --> 00:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>curse on the children, but it is that curse on the children</v>

00:31:38.640 --> 00:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that should be our greater interest.</v>

00:31:41.600 --> 00:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would we as a society permit children to be burdened with</v>

00:31:46.080 --> 00:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>this absolutely, totally unnecessary</v>

00:31:51.120 --> 00:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>additional confusion, this lack of belonging, this isolation, this alienation, this atomization,</v>

00:31:58.960 --> 00:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the disconnect from everyone and everything around them.</v>

00:32:04.080 --> 00:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason to pursue this.</v>

00:32:07.120 --> 00:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>There is every reason to avoid it.</v>

00:32:11.120 --> 00:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that is the reason that I made the tweet.</v>

00:32:14.880 --> 00:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Because it is indeed tantamount to murder.</v>

00:32:18.400 --> 00:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Because what you are doing is killing your own nation, and you</v>

00:32:23.600 --> 00:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to destroy your children.</v>

00:32:26.160 --> 00:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>They are going to struggle with this.</v>

00:32:28.320 --> 00:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>They may overcome it, but it will be a great deal of</v>

00:32:32.400 --> 00:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>effort on their part, and they will never fully overcome it.</v>

00:32:35.360 --> 00:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>They cannot fully overcome it because you have burdened them with something</v>

00:32:38.640 --> 00:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that is permanent in this life.</v>

00:32:42.400 --> 00:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that is the thing that those of us who point</v>

00:32:45.520 --> 00:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out these issues want to avoid.</v>

00:32:47.680 --> 00:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>We do not want</v>

00:32:49.520 --> 00:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>these children who are burdened in this way.</v>

00:32:54.880 --> 00:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Life is hard enough for many people and much of the time,</v>

00:32:59.920 --> 00:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>adding additional complication, additional burdens, additional weight is</v>

00:33:07.520 --> 00:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not what Christians should be seeking to do.</v>

00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It is not what any good person should be seeking to do.</v>

00:33:15.440 --> 00:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And so, yes, it is right teaching to tell people to avoid</v>

00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>these unwise unions, which do indeed rise to the level of sinful</v>

00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and Because of context.</v>

00:33:30.800 --> 00:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And so in summary, interracial marriages are not sinful per se.</v>

00:33:39.280 --> 00:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>However, in the modern context, they are virtually always sinful per quote,</v>

00:33:47.360 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it is right teaching for Christians to say that these</v>

00:33:51.440 --> 00:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>unwise unions should be avoided.</v>