WEBVTT

00:00:37.040 --> 00:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Stone Choir Podcast.</v>

00:00:39.520 --> 00:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I am Corey J.</v>

00:00:40.720 --> 00:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Mahler.</v>

00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm still Woe.</v>

00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>On today's Stone Choir, we are continuing our series on the Septuagint</v>

00:00:48.400 --> 00:00:53.200
<v Speaker 3>with a discussion of some alterations to content of a couple key</v>

00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:57.840
<v Speaker 3>books in the Old Testament, as well as alterations to the timelines</v>

00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of really the history of humanity, and particularly the history of the</v>

00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament chronology, which alters things, including the beginning of time itself.</v>

00:01:08.080 --> 00:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So we'll talk about that a little bit.</v>

00:01:10.720 --> 00:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Before we get into the content, I want to just give a</v>

00:01:13.600 --> 00:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>brief recap of where we have been, including where we've been for</v>

00:01:17.440 --> 00:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>last month.</v>

00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm very sorry that we haven't had an episode for a while.</v>

00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Something blows up every time we try to record the day that</v>

00:01:24.480 --> 00:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>we are gonna record whatever day that happens to be.</v>

00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty much the worst day of my life.</v>

00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not gonna wind up being a podcaster because it's the</v>

00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:35.040
<v Speaker 3>easiest job in the world, but it's embarrassing that I still can't</v>

00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>get it done.</v>

00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I lost my voice fifteen minutes into recording last week.</v>

00:01:39.360 --> 00:01:41.840
<v Speaker 3>My voice is still weak, which stinks 'cause I have no margin</v>

00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:42.400
<v Speaker 3>of error.</v>

00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Even my voice is strong, it's not strong, so I'm probably gonna</v>

00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of peter out towards the end of this, but we're gonna</v>

00:01:48.160 --> 00:01:50.800
<v Speaker 3>get this done no matter what.</v>

00:01:50.800 --> 00:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>The Septuagint framework that we eventually evolved as we were looking at</v>

00:01:55.440 --> 00:01:58.720
<v Speaker 3>this massive content we've been looking at for now the last 18</v>

00:01:58.720 --> 00:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>months. We began in episode 99 with introducing the concept of the</v>

00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:07.520
<v Speaker 3>context window, basically say there's gonna be so much here you can't</v>

00:02:07.520 --> 00:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>keep it all in your head.</v>

00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>That's nothing to be ashamed of or worried about, but there's a</v>

00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>lot going on here beyond just oh a couple verses changed and</v>

00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>so you know we can we can fix those in our Bibles</v>

00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and we don't have to worry about it.</v>

00:02:20.400 --> 00:02:22.800
<v Speaker 3>A septuagin thing is irrelevant.</v>

00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>In In episode 100 and 101, we went over the Near Eastern</v>

00:02:27.040 --> 00:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>chronology of the use and then disuse of the Septuagint.</v>

00:02:32.880 --> 00:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>And then in 101, we talked about what happened in the early</v>

00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>church in the West up through the Reformation.</v>

00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Why did we stop even talking about it?</v>

00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Because the whole reason that we're here talking about today is that</v>

00:02:44.960 --> 00:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>for eleven hundred years it just kind of vanished and no one</v>

00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>gave it any thought at all.</v>

00:02:50.320 --> 00:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>And we had to explain why it just went away because that</v>

00:02:53.440 --> 00:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>was never a conscious decision.</v>

00:02:55.040 --> 00:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Which is a big problem.</v>

00:02:56.160 --> 00:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>That'd be one thing, if the church had decided the Septuagint is</v>

00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>garbage, it's not authentic, we don't want anything to do with it.</v>

00:03:02.320 --> 00:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>That would have been wrong, but at least it would have been</v>

00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:05.920
<v Speaker 3>an act of decision.</v>

00:03:05.920 --> 00:03:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Instead, you have Jerome just sort of casually deciding unilaterally, I'm going</v>

00:03:10.240 --> 00:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>to use what the rabbinic text says.</v>

00:03:12.880 --> 00:03:17.600
<v Speaker 3>And because Greek had been lost mostly at that point and Latin</v>

00:03:17.600 --> 00:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>was necessary for the church in the West, everyone just went along</v>

00:03:21.120 --> 00:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>with it because they just needed a Latin Bible.</v>

00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And he produced one.</v>

00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:27.840
<v Speaker 3>He was generally respected as a scholar, so we'd explained how that</v>

00:03:27.840 --> 00:03:31.600
<v Speaker 3>happened. It was carelessness on the part of the church, and it</v>

00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>was nasty on the part of Jerome, if not outright evil.</v>

00:03:35.200 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 3>And then we're concluding our three part middle part series of the</v>

00:03:39.280 --> 00:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Septuagint this week in the Old Testament section where we began with</v>

00:03:44.640 --> 00:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the Christological passages in the Old Testament that were changed, some added,</v>

00:03:50.160 --> 00:03:54.320
<v Speaker 3>some removed, some altered, and talked about how important it is that</v>

00:03:54.320 --> 00:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>these things are being messed with.</v>

00:03:56.080 --> 00:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Whether the Septuagint is fake, whether it's wrong, or whether the rabbinic</v>

00:04:00.640 --> 00:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>text is fake and wrong, these things are different enough that we</v>

00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>have to really take seriously when you're messing with Christology.</v>

00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>You're going for the family jewels.</v>

00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>This is not peripheral stuff.</v>

00:04:12.320 --> 00:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>So we began there and we began explicitly with Isaiah seven fourteen.</v>

00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Because that verse about the virgin birth is the one that everyone</v>

00:04:19.440 --> 00:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>wants to get tunnel vision on, and pretend that's a big change.</v>

00:04:22.960 --> 00:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>And so if you clean that up and you can explain that,</v>

00:04:26.320 --> 00:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>you have to worry about the rest of the Septuagint stuff.</v>

00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>We've done the episode on a whole bunch of Christology.</v>

00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>We did the previous episode talking about wisdom literature.</v>

00:04:36.960 --> 00:04:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And because we covered a lot of psalms in the Christology episode,</v>

00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>we mostly focus on Proverbs and the Wisdom Literature episode the last</v>

00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:47.520
<v Speaker 3>time. And this week we're going to be concluding the Old Testament</v>

00:04:47.520 --> 00:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>changes focusing on Esther and Job, two books which have been changed</v>

00:04:53.840 --> 00:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>so radically either in their content or in their or in their</v>

00:04:57.840 --> 00:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>framing within the broader context of scripture, that they're not even the</v>

00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>same book in the Septuagint verses the rabbinic text that we're all</v>

00:05:06.880 --> 00:05:07.920
<v Speaker 3>familiar with.</v>

00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to spend a good amount of time today talking</v>

00:05:10.640 --> 00:05:12.480
<v Speaker 3>about the differences there.</v>

00:05:12.480 --> 00:05:15.520
<v Speaker 3>As I said, the last portion, which is where we're going to</v>

00:05:15.520 --> 00:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>begin this week, is on changes in the timelines, because the big</v>

00:05:20.400 --> 00:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>change in Job in terms of context is the timeline, which is</v>

00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:25.440
<v Speaker 3>completely stripped out of it.</v>

00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:29.360
<v Speaker 3>If you've read Job, he's just floating in space in the olden</v>

00:05:29.360 --> 00:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>times, this man who, you know, as Christians we believe wasn't mythical,</v>

00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>but we have no idea who he was, why did he have</v>

00:05:36.640 --> 00:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>all this money?</v>

00:05:37.920 --> 00:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>He must have been pretty important, but we don't know anything about</v>

00:05:40.640 --> 00:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>him. What was deleted by the rabbis explains quite clearly who Job</v>

00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>was. To begin talking about timelines, I want to point out something</v>

00:05:51.040 --> 00:05:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that will be the case as we're going throughout this episode.</v>

00:05:55.600 --> 00:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a difference between accuracy and precision.</v>

00:05:58.880 --> 00:06:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Accuracy means getting something right.</v>

00:06:01.520 --> 00:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>For example, the year of Jesus' birth.</v>

00:06:04.880 --> 00:06:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Some people believe it was AD one as it was calculated, and</v>

00:06:08.800 --> 00:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>we were using as a calendar, really for only about the last</v>

00:06:11.920 --> 00:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>eight hundred years, incidentally The early Christian Church had no notion of</v>

00:06:16.400 --> 00:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>this BCAD thing that was invented in the sixth century.</v>

00:06:20.960 --> 00:06:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And it was surprise, surprise.</v>

00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Alkin of York and Charlemagne then normalized in the West the use</v>

00:06:27.520 --> 00:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>of the year of Jesus' birth as year one for us counting</v>

00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>forward. It wasn't until the 1700s when Russia began to move away</v>

00:06:38.960 --> 00:06:43.920
<v Speaker 3>from the Byzantine calendar and adopt the calendar the rest of Europe</v>

00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:49.600
<v Speaker 3>uses, that the last vestiges of Christianity using a calendar based on</v>

00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the creation of the world was in general use.</v>

00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to talk too much about different calendaring systems this</v>

00:06:56.960 --> 00:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>week. That will be a significant portion of the bonus episode we're</v>

00:07:01.200 --> 00:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>going to do when we're talking about how to fix the Septuagint</v>

00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>translation problem that is ahead of the church.</v>

00:07:07.200 --> 00:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>We're also going to talk about the calendar problem because it's not</v>

00:07:10.080 --> 00:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>a trivial one.</v>

00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>But I bring it up now because it illustrates that as long</v>

00:07:16.080 --> 00:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>as everyone's on the same page, you're going to be able to</v>

00:07:18.880 --> 00:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>be precise.</v>

00:07:20.320 --> 00:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>So when we talk about the current calendar, we all know what</v>

00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>day we're talking about.</v>

00:07:25.280 --> 00:07:28.160
<v Speaker 3>When you go back in time, if you start looking at historical</v>

00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>records, you will very quickly run into all sorts of problems where</v>

00:07:31.760 --> 00:07:35.440
<v Speaker 3>if someone hasn't Along and reconciled the counter system we use today</v>

00:07:35.440 --> 00:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>with one they were using at the time, you can be off</v>

00:07:37.840 --> 00:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>by months or years, centuries in some cases, like just depending on</v>

00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>which countering system was being used by whoever is recording.</v>

00:07:45.840 --> 00:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Now, the important thing to understand about time, this isn't too philosophical,</v>

00:07:51.120 --> 00:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>is that it's a dimension.</v>

00:07:52.880 --> 00:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a part of creation, and it's always relative.</v>

00:07:56.320 --> 00:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>So, for example, I live in the Northeast, in North America.</v>

00:07:59.840 --> 00:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>If you live in Northeast, I am almost certainly to the northeast</v>

00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>of you.</v>

00:08:04.400 --> 00:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>But Northeast is only a relative comment.</v>

00:08:07.040 --> 00:08:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not northeast of any of you who are listening from Europe.</v>

00:08:09.840 --> 00:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm southwest because Europe is further north even than where I am.</v>

00:08:14.880 --> 00:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of weird.</v>

00:08:15.680 --> 00:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>If you ever look at the latitudes, Europe is a lot further</v>

00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:21.840
<v Speaker 3>north than North America relative to the weather that we have.</v>

00:08:21.840 --> 00:08:24.640
<v Speaker 3>It's remarkable how much the oceans change things.</v>

00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>So in space we understand perfectly well what relativity means when it</v>

00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:31.360
<v Speaker 3>comes to a fixed reference point.</v>

00:08:31.360 --> 00:08:33.600
<v Speaker 3>It's always relative to someone else.</v>

00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why something like the North Pole is valuable.</v>

00:08:35.760 --> 00:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>But even then, are you talking about magnetic north pole or are</v>

00:08:38.640 --> 00:08:40.560
<v Speaker 3>you talking about geographic north pole?</v>

00:08:40.560 --> 00:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Because they're two different things, and one of them's moving.</v>

00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>May flip actually.</v>

00:08:44.160 --> 00:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>That'll be pretty exciting if that happens in our lifetimes.</v>

00:08:47.280 --> 00:08:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Time works the same way.</v>

00:08:49.760 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Time is fixed.</v>

00:08:51.120 --> 00:08:53.120
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't vary.</v>

00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's that's a physics problem.</v>

00:08:55.760 --> 00:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll say for the sake of argument, it doesn't vary.</v>

00:08:58.000 --> 00:09:00.160
<v Speaker 3>In terms of, you know, a day is a day, year is</v>

00:09:00.160 --> 00:09:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a year, and for human purposes, that is not gonna be changing.</v>

00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So whether Jesus was born in one AD, as some say, maybe</v>

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>he was born in three BC, which others say, some you probably</v>

00:09:13.840 --> 00:09:14.960
<v Speaker 3>have strongly held opinions.</v>

00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I honestly don't know.</v>

00:09:16.160 --> 00:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I've looked at the arguments for both and they seem convincing.</v>

00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>I have yet to either spend or waste the time trying to</v>

00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>reconcile them and figure out which one I prefer or make up</v>

00:09:26.240 --> 00:09:27.040
<v Speaker 3>my own or whatever.</v>

00:09:27.040 --> 00:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't really care.</v>

00:09:27.920 --> 00:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Because as long as we're on the same page, we can be</v>

00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:35.200
<v Speaker 3>precise about our comparisons, even if the accuracy of the claim that</v>

00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Jesus was born in AD one may or may not be true.</v>

00:09:39.680 --> 00:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>What is important about the birth of Jesus in terms of timelines</v>

00:09:45.280 --> 00:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>is that we are two thousand years and change away from Jesus</v>

00:09:48.880 --> 00:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>birth, which means that around about twenty thirty, you know, five years</v>

00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>from now, we're gonna be at the two thousandth anniversary of either</v>

00:09:57.040 --> 00:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of Jesus' earthly ministry, or if he was born prior</v>

00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>to one AD, possibly his death, resurrection, and ascension.</v>

00:10:06.160 --> 00:10:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Both of which I think could potentially have significance.</v>

00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Not because man imbues significance to round numbers, but God does.</v>

00:10:13.520 --> 00:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>God likes round numbers a whole lot.</v>

00:10:15.920 --> 00:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>So not one iota of my faith hinges upon something happening in</v>

00:10:19.840 --> 00:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty or thirty three or thereabouts.</v>

00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Don't know.</v>

00:10:23.360 --> 00:10:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Don't care.</v>

00:10:24.160 --> 00:10:25.760
<v Speaker 3>But I'm paying attention.</v>

00:10:25.760 --> 00:10:29.360
<v Speaker 3>If things get a hundred times worse between now and twenty thirty,</v>

00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm really going to be paying attention.</v>

00:10:30.960 --> 00:10:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I would hope that you would too.</v>

00:10:32.960 --> 00:10:34.320
<v Speaker 3>But who knows?</v>

00:10:34.320 --> 00:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Like it doesn't matter about the accuracy of what God has not</v>

00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:42.720
<v Speaker 3>predicted specifically is going to happen, but we are told to watch.</v>

00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And time does matter.</v>

00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:47.360
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that we've said in the past, I'm really</v>

00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:48.880
<v Speaker 3>glad we did.</v>

00:10:48.880 --> 00:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>In the episode on evolution, we titled that six thousand years in</v>

00:10:53.040 --> 00:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>counting. And we mentioned in that episode that there are a couple</v>

00:10:57.600 --> 00:11:00.720
<v Speaker 3>different competing timelines, which we're going to talk about here today.</v>

00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>There's the rabbinic timeline, which we base the name of the episode</v>

00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:07.600
<v Speaker 3>on, where the creation of the earth was about six thousand years</v>

00:11:07.600 --> 00:11:12.240
<v Speaker 3>ago. If you use the Septuagint numbering instead, which the early church</v>

00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>did, everybody did.</v>

00:11:13.760 --> 00:11:15.440
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't just a Bible thing.</v>

00:11:15.440 --> 00:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>It was the general use of the calendar counting back to about</v>

00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>seventy five hundred years ago.</v>

00:11:22.400 --> 00:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>So about fifty five hundred would be the beginning of the universe.</v>

00:11:25.920 --> 00:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>We mentioned in the six thousand years accounting episode that those two</v>

00:11:29.520 --> 00:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>competing timelines existed.</v>

00:11:31.760 --> 00:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm really glad that we chose the wrong one to title</v>

00:11:35.440 --> 00:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>it because it's an example of one of the things that we</v>

00:11:38.160 --> 00:11:40.640
<v Speaker 3>as a church are gonna have to deal with in the future.</v>

00:11:40.640 --> 00:11:43.280
<v Speaker 3>We will have made mistakes about things.</v>

00:11:43.280 --> 00:11:46.960
<v Speaker 3>When we have relied on the rabbinic text, there are going to</v>

00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:49.200
<v Speaker 3>be cases where we've made mistakes.</v>

00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:52.800
<v Speaker 3>We cannot have any ego bound up and I was wrong.</v>

00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's important to know that there's sometimes the mistakes are incidental,</v>

00:11:57.040 --> 00:11:59.840
<v Speaker 3>as in the case of us naming it six thousand years and</v>

00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>counting instead of seventy five hundred.</v>

00:12:02.400 --> 00:12:03.680
<v Speaker 3>But in other cases the</v>

00:12:04.560 --> 00:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>mistakes can be material, which was not there.</v>

00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:10.240
<v Speaker 3>So we don't need to go back and we're not even going</v>

00:12:10.240 --> 00:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>to change the show notes for that episode because there's nothing to</v>

00:12:12.960 --> 00:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>retract. Because the argument that we made against evolution, we very specifically</v>

00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:21.440
<v Speaker 3>said it doesn't matter if it was six thousand years ago or</v>

00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>seventy five hundred years ago.</v>

00:12:23.040 --> 00:12:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Either way, Adam was the first man, there was zero evolution because</v>

00:12:27.440 --> 00:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>there was zero death.</v>

00:12:28.720 --> 00:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>So if nothing is dying, nothing is evolving.</v>

00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Adam was created from dust, and every man alive since then is</v>

00:12:35.920 --> 00:12:37.760
<v Speaker 3>descended from him, period.</v>

00:12:37.760 --> 00:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>No monkeys, no whales, no fish, no amoeba, no soup, nothing.</v>

00:12:42.800 --> 00:12:45.360
<v Speaker 3>So the entire argument that we made in the six thousand years</v>

00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and counting episode against evolution would have worked identically if we'd used</v>

00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Septuagint numbering.</v>

00:12:51.520 --> 00:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>And had we been making an argument at that time that hinged</v>

00:12:54.400 --> 00:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>on the 1500-year difference, we wouldn't have done the episode until we</v>

00:12:57.280 --> 00:12:58.880
<v Speaker 3>figured out which one was right.</v>

00:12:58.880 --> 00:13:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But because it wasn't material we didn't really look into it.</v>

00:13:01.520 --> 00:13:04.640
<v Speaker 3>There would have been a different timeline for everything about Stone Choir</v>

00:13:04.720 --> 00:13:08.080
<v Speaker 3>because if we dug into the Septuagint when we did, I think</v>

00:13:08.080 --> 00:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>we'd probably would have been doing this series a lot sooner because</v>

00:13:11.280 --> 00:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the changes, the errors, the mistakes are obvious and they're huge.</v>

00:13:15.760 --> 00:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>But sometimes your arguments are going to be made in good faith,</v>

00:13:19.760 --> 00:13:24.160
<v Speaker 3>but not predicated on something that you have to give up.</v>

00:13:24.160 --> 00:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>So evolution is still false regardless of which timeline we're using.</v>

00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>It's okay to have made mistakes.</v>

00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:35.360
<v Speaker 3>It's important to understand the nature and the character of your mistakes.</v>

00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:39.120
<v Speaker 3>We will, as a church, be getting into the future places where</v>

00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>we find that certain aspects of what we believe don't actually hold</v>

00:13:43.280 --> 00:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>up relative to the Septuagint.</v>

00:13:46.080 --> 00:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to be bound up in our egos to say,</v>

00:13:48.640 --> 00:13:51.280
<v Speaker 3>no, I'm a Christian, I would never make a mistake?</v>

00:13:51.280 --> 00:13:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Or are we going to accept the simple fact, the simple argument?</v>

00:13:54.800 --> 00:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>We weren't actually looking at scripture when we made those conclusions.</v>

00:13:58.640 --> 00:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>What is our duty to as Christians?</v>

00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:05.360
<v Speaker 3>It's to the Word of God, which then raises the question, which</v>

00:14:05.360 --> 00:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>is the Word of God?</v>

00:14:07.120 --> 00:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>And so it's not a circular argument, but you can beg the</v>

00:14:10.160 --> 00:14:13.200
<v Speaker 3>question if you assume that what you were previously using was the</v>

00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Was the pure word of God, and it turns out it wasn't,</v>

00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:18.320
<v Speaker 3>which is what we're demonstrating here.</v>

00:14:18.320 --> 00:14:23.920
<v Speaker 3>As Corey will get into later on, our Bibles are littered with</v>

00:14:23.920 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 3>places where despite claiming to have used the rabbinic text, they ignored</v>

00:14:28.400 --> 00:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>entirely and used the Septuagint all over the place.</v>

00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>We confess the Septuagint left and right today as Christians.</v>

00:14:35.200 --> 00:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>God's preserved our faith by the Septuagint even while post reformation, everyone</v>

00:14:40.560 --> 00:14:42.800
<v Speaker 3>was pretending to ignore it.</v>

00:14:42.800 --> 00:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>The importance of acknowledging that we made mistakes is necessary because otherwise</v>

00:14:47.520 --> 00:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>repentance isn't possible.</v>

00:14:49.360 --> 00:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>You go back and listen to the entire episode on repentance, that's</v>

00:14:51.760 --> 00:14:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the point.</v>

00:14:52.480 --> 00:14:54.080
<v Speaker 3>You have to realize you did something wrong.</v>

00:14:54.320 --> 00:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Repentance is not simply a question of sin.</v>

00:14:56.720 --> 00:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a question of error.</v>

00:14:57.680 --> 00:14:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a question of mistake.</v>

00:14:58.960 --> 00:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>If you've ever accidentally driven down a the wrong side of a</v>

00:15:02.880 --> 00:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>divided street, I did this once in Madison, it was kind of</v>

00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>scary, it was late at night, so it didn't matter.</v>

00:15:07.920 --> 00:15:10.640
<v Speaker 3>It was a very wide intersection, I was making a left turn.</v>

00:15:10.640 --> 00:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>It was confusing the way it was laid out.</v>

00:15:12.560 --> 00:15:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I accidentally went down the wrong way for like ten feet.</v>

00:15:16.720 --> 00:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I realized my error as I was turning in and I had</v>

00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to back up and then go through another no one else's around</v>

00:15:22.400 --> 00:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>so no one got hurt, but I repented of my wrong left</v>

00:15:26.480 --> 00:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>turn. That's repentance.</v>

00:15:28.160 --> 00:15:29.760
<v Speaker 3>You back up, you fix it.</v>

00:15:29.760 --> 00:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>It's embarrassing.</v>

00:15:30.800 --> 00:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>It's potentially dangerous, but you gotta do it.</v>

00:15:33.760 --> 00:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>The alternative, the egoistic approach to making a wrong left turn and</v>

00:15:38.240 --> 00:15:40.560
<v Speaker 3>ending up on the wrong side of a street, you just keep</v>

00:15:40.560 --> 00:15:43.680
<v Speaker 3>going. I'm an excellent driver, I don't make mistakes when I'm driving.</v>

00:15:43.680 --> 00:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And you drive down the wrong side and you hit somebody head</v>

00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>on. We're in that position as a church where we have relied</v>

00:15:51.280 --> 00:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in good conscience on things that we are going to realize are</v>

00:15:55.680 --> 00:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>not reliable.</v>

00:15:56.880 --> 00:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to be covering some of those today.</v>

00:15:59.520 --> 00:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>But just keep in mind that as you realize these things, don't</v>

00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>be embarrassed.</v>

00:16:04.000 --> 00:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not the important part.</v>

00:16:05.600 --> 00:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>The important part is not that you were wrong about anything or</v>

00:16:09.440 --> 00:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>whatever. The important part is not that you are embarrassed by a</v>

00:16:13.040 --> 00:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>mistake. The important part is to be in accord with God, whatever</v>

00:16:16.160 --> 00:16:17.280
<v Speaker 3>God's word is.</v>

00:16:17.280 --> 00:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Even if you totally reject everything that we say about the Septuagint,</v>

00:16:21.040 --> 00:16:24.560
<v Speaker 3>and you triple down on the rabbinic text, well, like I just</v>

00:16:24.560 --> 00:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>said, you're gonna have to burn your Bible that's based on the</v>

00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Rabbinic Text because it's not really.</v>

00:16:28.720 --> 00:16:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Your Old Testament is full of Septuagint.</v>

00:16:31.520 --> 00:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>If you actually reject the Septuagint, you have to get rid of</v>

00:16:34.640 --> 00:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>every Bible you have and fix the ones that rely on the</v>

00:16:37.920 --> 00:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Rabbinic text for frequently the Hebrew is unclear.</v>

00:16:41.120 --> 00:16:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Corey and I were joking earlier, the footnote is so frequently used</v>

00:16:44.240 --> 00:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>that the Hebrew is unclear, that we wish that we could title</v>

00:16:47.600 --> 00:16:49.600
<v Speaker 3>one of these episodes with that.</v>

00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>That footnote, the Hebrew is unclear, is basically</v>

00:16:52.640 --> 00:16:54.880
<v Speaker 3>where the church has been.</v>

00:16:54.880 --> 00:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>But those decisions have been left to these translators and translation committees.</v>

00:16:58.720 --> 00:17:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Usually they don't even footnote the stuff.</v>

00:17:00.720 --> 00:17:03.840
<v Speaker 3>So you as a reader just plowing through scripture have no idea.</v>

00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>You don't know when you're reading the Old Testament over and over</v>

00:17:06.560 --> 00:17:10.240
<v Speaker 3>again. You've been reading the Septuagint, just in bits and pieces, places</v>

00:17:10.240 --> 00:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>where the rabbis either corrupted or just lost or confused things to</v>

00:17:13.680 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 3>the point that or in some cases, Hebrew is just so worthless</v>

00:17:16.400 --> 00:17:19.920
<v Speaker 3>as a so-called language, you can't actually use it.</v>

00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>God has preserved the church through the Septuagint even while we've been</v>

00:17:23.680 --> 00:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>wandering through the wilderness here with this Hebrew crap.</v>

00:17:26.800 --> 00:17:30.080
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we're going to be a little bit embarrassed.</v>

00:17:30.080 --> 00:17:33.360
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna realize that we have to put some footnotes in some</v>

00:17:33.360 --> 00:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of our own comments in the past and realize the things that</v>

00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:39.120
<v Speaker 3>we said before we can't say again because they don't hold up.</v>

00:17:39.120 --> 00:17:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Repentance means accepting that and doing it humbly and willfully, and with</v>

00:17:44.640 --> 00:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>full knowledge that God forgives our errors, but He will not forgive</v>

00:17:48.320 --> 00:17:52.320
<v Speaker 3>those who cling to their error in the face of rebuke.</v>

00:17:52.320 --> 00:17:53.920
<v Speaker 3>The timelines that we're going to be talking about</v>

00:17:54.800 --> 00:17:59.520
<v Speaker 3>here are not new in the Septuagint either.</v>

00:17:59.520 --> 00:18:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Going back to about 220 BC, the timelines that we're going to</v>

00:18:05.360 --> 00:18:09.920
<v Speaker 3>be discussing were where the genealogies, this is principally where the alterations</v>

00:18:09.920 --> 00:18:11.680
<v Speaker 3>have occurred in the rabbinic text.</v>

00:18:11.680 --> 00:18:16.800
<v Speaker 3>In the genealogies in Genesis 5 and Genesis 11, the patriarchs have</v>

00:18:16.800 --> 00:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>had their generations altered radically and very ham fistedly.</v>

00:18:20.960 --> 00:18:25.680
<v Speaker 3>And In a fashion that is novel to the church.</v>

00:18:25.680 --> 00:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Going back to about 220 BC, Demetrius the chronographer, and in 150</v>

00:18:31.040 --> 00:18:35.440
<v Speaker 3>BC roughly, a man named Oipolemus, both of whom were cited by</v>

00:18:35.440 --> 00:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Eusebius in three hundred twenty five AD, attest to the Septuagint chronologies</v>

00:18:40.480 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to talk about.</v>

00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 3>And in the first century of both Philo of Alexandria, the Jewish</v>

00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:51.360
<v Speaker 3>convert into Judaism, we've talked about previously, and Josephus both use the</v>

00:18:51.360 --> 00:18:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Septuagint chronologies as factual.</v>

00:18:55.440 --> 00:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>So the first time in the church the the rabbinic timelines that</v>

00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>we're all used to today, the ones that I mentioned in the</v>

00:19:04.960 --> 00:19:09.600
<v Speaker 3>evolution episode, the one thing that I couldn't reconcile about the rabbinic</v>

00:19:09.600 --> 00:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>timeline of you know, the flood being about forty five hundred years</v>

00:19:13.040 --> 00:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>ago was that there are pyramids that are forty seven hundred years</v>

00:19:17.760 --> 00:19:19.600
<v Speaker 3>old. That's a fact.</v>

00:19:19.600 --> 00:19:20.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not ambiguous.</v>

00:19:20.800 --> 00:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>There are unambiguously pyramids that can be proven to be two hundred</v>

00:19:25.040 --> 00:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>years older</v>

00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:31.520
<v Speaker 3>than the date in the rabbinic text says the flood occurred.</v>

00:19:31.520 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure I acknowledge in that episode, I don't know what</v>

00:19:34.480 --> 00:19:35.200
<v Speaker 3>to think.</v>

00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>It's one of those cases where I believe my lying eyes and</v>

00:19:38.400 --> 00:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I believe the Word of God.</v>

00:19:39.840 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 3>And I couldn't reconcile the two, and so I just basically threw</v>

00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:45.680
<v Speaker 3>it on the altar of Lord I believe help my unbelief.</v>

00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Which is often where some of these things come down to.</v>

00:19:48.320 --> 00:19:51.440
<v Speaker 3>We have to be humble enough to say, I'm not smart enough,</v>

00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the reason.</v>

00:19:52.720 --> 00:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the facts to be able to figure this out,</v>

00:19:56.080 --> 00:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>and I believe scripture, and I'm going to trust God, even when</v>

00:19:59.520 --> 00:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand.</v>

00:20:00.640 --> 00:20:04.160
<v Speaker 3>There's no man in the universe who's so smart that he will</v>

00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:06.000
<v Speaker 3>not at some point run into that.</v>

00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Because some of God's mysteries, that's the only way to deal with</v>

00:20:09.840 --> 00:20:14.080
<v Speaker 3>it. We've talked about before, when you talk about communion, when you</v>

00:20:14.080 --> 00:20:19.200
<v Speaker 3>talk about the hypostatic union of Christ, There is no rational explanation</v>

00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:22.000
<v Speaker 3>for what's going on because those are supernatural.</v>

00:20:22.000 --> 00:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>The difference is that time is real.</v>

00:20:25.040 --> 00:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Time is part of creation.</v>

00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not supernaturally moving around.</v>

00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:34.400
<v Speaker 3>So So the rabbinic timeline that says the flood was 4,500 years</v>

00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:38.800
<v Speaker 3>ago does not jive with archaeological evidence.</v>

00:20:38.800 --> 00:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>A pyramid could not exist given the description of the flood.</v>

00:20:43.040 --> 00:20:46.240
<v Speaker 3>It just wouldn't be there, wouldn't have been buried under miles of</v>

00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>silt and mud.</v>

00:20:47.520 --> 00:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>It certainly would have been destroyed.</v>

00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:53.040
<v Speaker 3>And so when we did that episode, like I don't know, I</v>

00:20:53.040 --> 00:20:56.160
<v Speaker 3>believe forty five hundred years because it's what the Bible says, and</v>

00:20:56.160 --> 00:20:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I believe there's definitely a pyramid sitting here that's forty, seven hundred</v>

00:20:59.200 --> 00:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>years old.</v>

00:20:59.760 --> 00:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what to make of it.</v>

00:21:02.000 --> 00:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>But it made me uncomfortable because it didn't seem to add up.</v>

00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>And we're dealing with a pyramid and we're dealing with years.</v>

00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Those are not supernatural things.</v>

00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:12.720
<v Speaker 3>So trust God, but</v>

00:21:12.800 --> 00:21:13.040
you

00:21:13.040 --> 00:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>know, I</v>

00:21:13.520 --> 00:21:14.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know what do you do?</v>

00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>All you can do is believe God and not worry about it</v>

00:21:17.600 --> 00:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>too much.</v>

00:21:18.560 --> 00:21:23.040
<v Speaker 3>However, when you look at the Septuagint timeline, makes perfect sense.</v>

00:21:23.040 --> 00:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>The flood was much before the construction of those pyramids.</v>

00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:29.200
<v Speaker 3>They could absolutely exist with the timeline.</v>

00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:32.480
<v Speaker 3>They was in use in 220 BC and in you know the</v>

00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:34.720
<v Speaker 3>first century and the fourth century.</v>

00:21:34.720 --> 00:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>The problem was created by the rabbis to cover up some of</v>

00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the other things that they were up to.</v>

00:21:40.560 --> 00:21:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So just remember that as we're going through these timelines, no Christian</v>

00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>before Jerome ever engaged in the sort of nonsense that we've been</v>

00:21:48.960 --> 00:21:52.480
<v Speaker 3>subjected to, particularly since the Reformation.</v>

00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I do want to note that there's a single source in antiquity</v>

00:21:56.800 --> 00:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that does represent the rabbinic timelines, something that's older than</v>

00:22:02.240 --> 00:22:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the thousand year old Masoretic text that we're stuck with today.</v>

00:22:06.960 --> 00:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>There are examples from roughly one hundred sixty, one fifty BC from</v>

00:22:10.800 --> 00:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the Qumran Caves of the Book of Jubilees, and there are a</v>

00:22:14.240 --> 00:22:15.520
<v Speaker 3>number of copies of that.</v>

00:22:15.520 --> 00:22:18.480
<v Speaker 3>And the Book of Jubilees, which was an apocryphal book, it's not</v>

00:22:18.480 --> 00:22:22.160
<v Speaker 3>canonical, I think, in any one's estimation, but it was a written</v>

00:22:22.160 --> 00:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>record, does include at least some of these changes to the genealogies.</v>

00:22:27.360 --> 00:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So when Jerome imported the rabbinic changes in the fourth century, it</v>

00:22:33.760 --> 00:22:35.200
<v Speaker 3>wasn't brand new at the time.</v>

00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:38.800
<v Speaker 3>It was something that had been around at least as long as</v>

00:22:38.800 --> 00:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>about 150 BC.</v>

00:22:40.480 --> 00:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>But crucially, that's still newer than the evidence that we have of</v>

00:22:44.720 --> 00:22:47.120
<v Speaker 3>the Septuagint timeline.</v>

00:22:47.120 --> 00:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>So as we're going through the dates today, sometimes we're going to</v>

00:22:50.480 --> 00:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about 80 BC.</v>

00:22:52.080 --> 00:22:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to try to stick to the point of the</v>

00:22:54.320 --> 00:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>origin date of the earth because we don't know accurately, but we</v>

00:22:57.760 --> 00:23:00.480
<v Speaker 3>know it's in the ballpark of seventy five hundred years ago.</v>

00:23:00.480 --> 00:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Some of the counts say seventy five eleven, some say seventy five</v>

00:23:04.160 --> 00:23:05.360
<v Speaker 3>thirty three.</v>

00:23:05.360 --> 00:23:07.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the links will be in the show notes, says I</v>

00:23:07.440 --> 00:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>believe 7558.</v>

00:23:09.680 --> 00:23:11.120
<v Speaker 3>And we'll link that.</v>

00:23:11.120 --> 00:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>And I want to include that in the show notes, and it's</v>

00:23:15.120 --> 00:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>worth looking at.</v>

00:23:16.080 --> 00:23:19.680
<v Speaker 3>We're not vouching for his conclusions, all of them, but it's a</v>

00:23:19.680 --> 00:23:25.040
<v Speaker 3>very excellent summation of just how complicated timelines have always been.</v>

00:23:25.040 --> 00:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>So this guy who's trying to reconcile the Septuagint, trying to make</v>

00:23:28.080 --> 00:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the same kind of cleanup that we are, lays out some of</v>

00:23:31.840 --> 00:23:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the fights and some of the inconsistencies that occur so you can</v>

00:23:34.880 --> 00:23:37.120
<v Speaker 3>understand how complicated it is.</v>

00:23:37.120 --> 00:23:40.560
<v Speaker 3>When we're doing some of the dates in this episode, we're just</v>

00:23:40.560 --> 00:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>going to use relative dates.</v>

00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to begin later on and we're talking about Job's</v>

00:23:46.160 --> 00:23:50.000
<v Speaker 3>timeline. We're gonna talk about Abraham's birth as basically year one.</v>

00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Kind of instead of A D, it's gonna be you know the</v>

00:23:52.240 --> 00:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>birth of Abraham.</v>

00:23:53.600 --> 00:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>If that is year one, that is a fixed point in time,</v>

00:23:56.960 --> 00:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a real point.</v>

00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So within the text of scripture, we can make precise measurements from</v>

00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the date of Abraham's birth in terms of years, and we can</v>

00:24:06.560 --> 00:24:09.200
<v Speaker 3>be consistent from that point forward.</v>

00:24:09.200 --> 00:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That precision is going to hold in everything that we say today,</v>

00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>even if there's ambiguity about the accuracy of the year in which</v>

00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Abraham is born.</v>

00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>So I hope you can track with this.</v>

00:24:19.280 --> 00:24:23.120
<v Speaker 3>The accuracy of a particular date in the past is not going</v>

00:24:23.120 --> 00:24:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to be relevant to any of the arguments that we're making.</v>

00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>The relative precision within the text itself does matter, because you can</v>

00:24:31.200 --> 00:24:34.800
<v Speaker 3>move Abraham's birth around a couple hundred years, even with some of</v>

00:24:34.800 --> 00:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>these timeline things, as long as the text itself is internally consistent,</v>

00:24:40.080 --> 00:24:42.960
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to be falling into error with the conclusions that</v>

00:24:42.960 --> 00:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>you make.</v>

00:24:44.000 --> 00:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Because it doesn't matter to me personally or to you personally whether</v>

00:24:48.800 --> 00:24:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the flood was 4,500 years ago or fifty three hundred years ago.</v>

00:24:53.360 --> 00:24:54.960
<v Speaker 3>What difference does it make?</v>

00:24:54.960 --> 00:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It only makes difference relative to whatever other events would have occurred</v>

00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:01.840
<v Speaker 3>before or after that.</v>

00:25:01.840 --> 00:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>But being specific doesn't really matter.</v>

00:25:04.800 --> 00:25:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So I hope that you can come along with that and not</v>

00:25:07.920 --> 00:25:12.000
<v Speaker 3>get too hung up on, well, if I don't believe, you know,</v>

00:25:12.000 --> 00:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>if I don't believe 7511 versus 7533 thirty three, that doesn't mean</v>

00:25:17.760 --> 00:25:20.320
<v Speaker 3>that the ballpark figure isn't true.</v>

00:25:20.320 --> 00:25:22.640
<v Speaker 3>It's okay to be off by a little bit, but you can't</v>

00:25:22.640 --> 00:25:24.000
<v Speaker 3>be off by a lot.</v>

00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Just like with Jesus birth, whether it was eighty one or BC</v>

00:25:27.120 --> 00:25:29.920
<v Speaker 3>three or some other number, it's really close to that.</v>

00:25:29.920 --> 00:25:31.920
<v Speaker 3>We definitely know it's really close to that.</v>

00:25:31.920 --> 00:25:35.600
<v Speaker 3>It can only be a couple of those years because of historical</v>

00:25:35.600 --> 00:25:39.200
<v Speaker 3>records we have from Judea and Rome and from</v>

00:25:40.400 --> 00:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Celestial records that we have.</v>

00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:45.840
<v Speaker 3>We have a very good idea that's right close to the number</v>

00:25:45.840 --> 00:25:46.880
<v Speaker 3>we have.</v>

00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:47.840
<v Speaker 3>That's good enough.</v>

00:25:47.840 --> 00:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>It's good enough for government work.</v>

00:25:49.040 --> 00:25:50.640
<v Speaker 3>It's good enough for being a Christian.</v>

00:25:50.640 --> 00:25:53.280
<v Speaker 3>What I don't want is for anyone's faith to be undermined by</v>

00:25:53.600 --> 00:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, so I'm going to give up on the whole</v>

00:25:55.200 --> 00:25:57.520
<v Speaker 3>thing. That's not a Christian conclusion.</v>

00:25:57.520 --> 00:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>We try to get this stuff right, and if you can't figure</v>

00:25:59.600 --> 00:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it out, just leave it alone, just like I did with the</v>

00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:06.880
<v Speaker 3>pyramids before, before I knew that the Septuagint timeline was accurate.</v>

00:26:07.040 --> 00:26:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't have to do with the pyramids, don't worry about</v>

00:26:09.120 --> 00:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>it. I've never lost a lick of sleep over the fact that</v>

00:26:12.080 --> 00:26:15.840
<v Speaker 3>my lying eyes and the chronology and the rabbinic text didn't match.</v>

00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know, whatever.</v>

00:26:17.520 --> 00:26:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't hurt me either way.</v>

00:26:18.880 --> 00:26:21.840
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not going to lose faith in the text.</v>

00:26:21.840 --> 00:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The good news is that the more we use a Septuagint for</v>

00:26:24.800 --> 00:26:28.080
<v Speaker 3>these things, the more we find those problems just vanish.</v>

00:26:28.080 --> 00:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>There are far fewer questions of accuracy and precision of timelines with</v>

00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a Septuagint than there are with the rabbinic text.</v>

00:26:36.960 --> 00:26:38.000
<v Speaker 3>And there's a reason for</v>

00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:38.640
that.

00:26:39.760 --> 00:26:39.920
So

00:26:39.920 --> 00:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>when Woe said that it is ham fisted the way they went</v>

00:26:43.520 --> 00:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>about making these changes and the changes changes themselves in these genealogies.</v>

00:26:49.040 --> 00:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>It is almost an understatement.</v>

00:26:51.760 --> 00:26:57.680
<v Speaker 2>They basically just deleted a century in terms of the begetting ages</v>

00:26:57.680 --> 00:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of the patriarchs.</v>

00:26:59.440 --> 00:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>But they were not entirely consistent in doing so, because it would</v>

00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>have created problems for them down the line had they simply deleted</v>

00:27:09.040 --> 00:27:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a century from each of the patriarchs.</v>

00:27:11.920 --> 00:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>And so for instance, if you look at this, you actually have</v>

00:27:16.080 --> 00:27:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a very clear trajectory in terms of the age of begetting children,</v>

00:27:22.160 --> 00:27:26.560
<v Speaker 2>from Adam straight through Noah, essentially, Noah being a rather extreme outlier.</v>

00:27:27.760 --> 00:27:30.720
<v Speaker 2>But for Adam you have his age of begetting is two hundred</v>

00:27:30.720 --> 00:27:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and thirty, and then Seth at two hundred and five, Enosh at</v>

00:27:33.360 --> 00:27:36.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred ninety, Kenan at one hundred seventy, Mahalel at one hundred</v>

00:27:36.560 --> 00:27:42.880
<v Speaker 2>sixty five, Jared 162, Enoch 165, Methuselah 187, bumps up a little</v>

00:27:42.880 --> 00:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>bit there, Lamac one eighty eight, Noah at five hundred, those are</v>

00:27:47.280 --> 00:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the ages from the Septuagint.</v>

00:27:49.600 --> 00:27:52.160
<v Speaker 2>You have a little more of a roller coaster going on over</v>

00:27:52.160 --> 00:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Masoretic Land.</v>

00:27:53.920 --> 00:28:00.960
<v Speaker 2>You have 130, 105, 90, 70, 65, 162, incidentally matches the Septuagint</v>

00:28:00.960 --> 00:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>for that one.</v>

00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:05.520
<v Speaker 2>65, 187, one eighty seven again, matches the Septuagint.</v>

00:28:05.600 --> 00:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>182, they just deleted six years, and then five hundred for Noah.</v>

00:28:11.600 --> 00:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Now one thing they did do when they were playing this little</v>

00:28:13.840 --> 00:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>game and perhaps it hints at the fact that they were in</v>

00:28:16.720 --> 00:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>fact fiddling with the timeline.</v>

00:28:18.800 --> 00:28:23.440
<v Speaker 2>If you use the Masoretic, then Methuselah dies the year of the</v>

00:28:23.440 --> 00:28:28.160
<v Speaker 2>flood. Rather convenient, that's how it happens, and they actually do comment</v>

00:28:28.160 --> 00:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>on that in the Talmud, saying that saying that God had Methuselah</v>

00:28:32.800 --> 00:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>die six days, or seven days, depending on how you read that,</v>

00:28:36.560 --> 00:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>before the flood in order to provide for a period of mourning,</v>

00:28:39.520 --> 00:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the flood came.</v>

00:28:40.800 --> 00:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>And so they wrote a commentary on their edits to scripture.</v>

00:28:44.000 --> 00:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps unsurprisingly.</v>

00:28:47.280 --> 00:28:52.640
<v Speaker 2>However, if you look at the actual timeline in the Septuagint, Methuselah</v>

00:28:52.640 --> 00:28:55.280
<v Speaker 2>dies six years before the flood.</v>

00:28:55.280 --> 00:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>There's no potential conflict there.</v>

00:28:57.520 --> 00:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Some people will attempt to point out that there is a typographical</v>

00:29:02.640 --> 00:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>or really a scribal error in this case in Alexandrinus in that</v>

00:29:07.200 --> 00:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>particular codex because it has 167, but clearly that is 187, which</v>

00:29:12.000 --> 00:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>is what we have in Vaticanus.</v>

00:29:14.320 --> 00:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>So that is the age, the begetting age for Methuselah.</v>

00:29:19.520 --> 00:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>But more important really than just these individual changes is the overall</v>

00:29:25.760 --> 00:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>change, what they did overall to this.</v>

00:29:28.560 --> 00:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get into this a little bit more later on as</v>

00:29:31.600 --> 00:29:33.680
<v Speaker 2>well. I will be commenting on this again in my In my</v>

00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>closing for this episode, but you have basically a thousand-year difference here.</v>

00:29:40.000 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a significant change.</v>

00:29:42.160 --> 00:29:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So if you're looking at the Septuagint and you calculate these years,</v>

00:29:46.640 --> 00:29:51.760
<v Speaker 2>what you wind up with is 1662 up to Noah.</v>

00:29:51.760 --> 00:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you are looking instead at the Masoretic, you have 1056.</v>

00:29:57.920 --> 00:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a rather significant gap, a rather significant edit.</v>

00:30:01.760 --> 00:30:04.880
<v Speaker 2>And as Woe pointed out, this starts to make things not align</v>

00:30:04.880 --> 00:30:08.800
<v Speaker 2>with what we actually know from archaeology of human history.</v>

00:30:08.800 --> 00:30:13.360
<v Speaker 2>You don't have this problem if you're dealing with the Septuagint timeline,</v>

00:30:13.360 --> 00:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you have this problem if you're dealing with the Masoretic.</v>

00:30:16.080 --> 00:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>They created this problem.</v>

00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Now for them, they didn't realize it was a problem because they</v>

00:30:21.040 --> 00:30:25.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the archaeological records we have today, they did not understand</v>

00:30:25.360 --> 00:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>they were creating this problem in the timeline.</v>

00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:32.400
<v Speaker 2>They thought they were just editing these dates and changing things around.</v>

00:30:32.400 --> 00:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Part of the reason for that, and I will get into this</v>

00:30:35.200 --> 00:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>more in the conclusion, but part of the reason for that is</v>

00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>because they wanted to downplay the fact that Christ appeared at a</v>

00:30:43.280 --> 00:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>point in time that more or less aligned with what the Jews</v>

00:30:47.200 --> 00:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>thought was going to happen.</v>

00:30:49.360 --> 00:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, Scripture doesn't actually tell us that the Christ is going to</v>

00:30:53.440 --> 00:30:56.400
<v Speaker 2>appear in the sixth age, which is what the Jews happen to</v>

00:30:56.400 --> 00:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>think. They thought six thousand years after the creation is when the</v>

00:31:01.280 --> 00:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Christ would appear.</v>

00:31:03.040 --> 00:31:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Turns out that if you actually</v>

00:31:04.880 --> 00:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>run the numbers and look at the Septuagint, it's about fifty five</v>

00:31:08.560 --> 00:31:09.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred years.</v>

00:31:09.520 --> 00:31:11.600
<v Speaker 2>It basically matches what they believe.</v>

00:31:11.600 --> 00:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Again, scripture doesn't tell us this, so Christians aren't bound to believe</v>

00:31:16.480 --> 00:31:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that Christ had to appear at some particular point in time in</v>

00:31:20.480 --> 00:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>history. But it was very inconvenient for the Jews at the time,</v>

00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly these things happening after the destruction of the temple.</v>

00:31:28.480 --> 00:31:33.040
<v Speaker 2>It's very inconvenient for them to have this long standing tradition of</v>

00:31:33.040 --> 00:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>saying the Christ is going to appear in the sixth age and</v>

00:31:35.840 --> 00:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>then lo and behold Jesus Christ appears in the sixth age.</v>

00:31:39.600 --> 00:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>That looks bad for the Jews.</v>

00:31:41.840 --> 00:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>And was undoubtedly used in order to convert some of the Jews</v>

00:31:45.920 --> 00:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>into Christians, because they would have looked at it.</v>

00:31:49.040 --> 00:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Our tradition has been saying, for however long they happen to be</v>

00:31:52.320 --> 00:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>passing this down orally, that the Christ is going to appear And</v>

00:31:56.560 --> 00:31:59.280
<v Speaker 2>then he appeared at the time we thought he would appear.</v>

00:31:59.280 --> 00:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a pretty strong argument in their context.</v>

00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Again, in our context, neither here nor there, because we're not bound</v>

00:32:05.360 --> 00:32:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to believe one way or the other on that.</v>

00:32:07.600 --> 00:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you add up those numbers, it is about the year</v>

00:32:10.160 --> 00:32:11.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty five hundred.</v>

00:32:11.280 --> 00:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Again, as Wo said, there's some leeway as it were there, you</v>

00:32:15.440 --> 00:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>know, plus or minus sixty years, give or take.</v>

00:32:18.800 --> 00:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter the exact date of creation.</v>

00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And so if you happen to be someone who's very attached to,</v>

00:32:25.440 --> 00:32:30.080
<v Speaker 2>say, Usher's chronology and you like that number four thousand four BC,</v>

00:32:30.080 --> 00:32:34.480
<v Speaker 2>too bad, the Septuagint very clearly gives us a different date for</v>

00:32:34.480 --> 00:32:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that I kind of liked 4004 BC.</v>

00:32:37.520 --> 00:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>But that's not the issue.</v>

00:32:39.120 --> 00:32:43.360
<v Speaker 2>The issue is not whether or not we know specifically the day,</v>

00:32:43.360 --> 00:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in some cases, some of these men tried to calculate the exact</v>

00:32:45.840 --> 00:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>day of creation.</v>

00:32:47.840 --> 00:32:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Rather the point is we have these genealogies, we have a chronology</v>

00:32:52.320 --> 00:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>that scripture gives us, and the one in the Masoretic text does</v>

00:32:56.720 --> 00:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>not match the Septuagint, and it also does not match what we</v>

00:33:00.320 --> 00:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>know from history to be true.</v>

00:33:02.240 --> 00:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Even If you have things in Scripture, supposed Scripture, that do not</v>

00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>match facts that you know, you only have two resolutions to that</v>

00:33:11.760 --> 00:33:16.480
<v Speaker 2>possible. One the fact you thought you knew is not in fact</v>

00:33:16.560 --> 00:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a fact, but we do know the age of the pyramids, for</v>

00:33:20.240 --> 00:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>instance, there are other things as well.</v>

00:33:22.320 --> 00:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Or the other option, what you have is not in fact true</v>

00:33:26.480 --> 00:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>to scripture, it is not in fact God's word.</v>

00:33:28.560 --> 00:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>It has been edited in some way, there's a scribal error, whatever</v>

00:33:31.440 --> 00:33:33.600
<v Speaker 2>it happens to be.</v>

00:33:33.600 --> 00:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>In our case, we don't have the problem of trying to explain</v>

00:33:36.800 --> 00:33:40.480
<v Speaker 2>away a scribal error, because there is no scribal error.</v>

00:33:40.480 --> 00:33:43.040
<v Speaker 2>There were edits made by the Jews.</v>

00:33:43.040 --> 00:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>And this is something that early Christians recognize.</v>

00:33:45.680 --> 00:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>This is not something that we are pulling out of thin air</v>

00:33:49.120 --> 00:33:52.560
<v Speaker 2>or we've created this or we're the first men to notice.</v>

00:33:52.560 --> 00:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>No, this was recognized early on in the churches, in the very</v>

00:33:57.120 --> 00:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>early Christian church, and for instance we have Eusebius saying, Therefore we</v>

00:34:01.600 --> 00:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>suspect that this was something which the Jews did, of the changes</v>

00:34:05.280 --> 00:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to the title of the timeline versus the Septuagint.</v>

00:34:09.120 --> 00:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>This is something that has been recognized by Christians, we just simply</v>

00:34:12.960 --> 00:34:17.360
<v Speaker 2>forgot it over the ensuing centuries, and we have accepted from the</v>

00:34:17.360 --> 00:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>hand of the Jews this timeline that does not match.</v>

00:34:21.040 --> 00:34:23.440
<v Speaker 2>And there are other wicked things that they do with this because</v>

00:34:23.440 --> 00:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>as soon as you start tweaking the timeline, there are other things</v>

00:34:27.120 --> 00:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that you can do downstream.</v>

00:34:29.120 --> 00:34:32.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not just a matter of minimizing Christ, which of course they</v>

00:34:32.240 --> 00:34:34.960
<v Speaker 2>did, and there were many of the church fathers who commented on</v>

00:34:34.960 --> 00:34:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that as well, saying that the Jews fiddled with verses about the</v>

00:34:39.120 --> 00:34:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Messiah, about the Christ, and we went over that in a previous</v>

00:34:42.240 --> 00:34:46.800
<v Speaker 2>episode. But when you start fiddling with the timeline, it opens up</v>

00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the possibility of doing other things downstream.</v>

00:34:50.480 --> 00:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>And even if you step back and ignore the wickedness of doing</v>

00:34:54.000 --> 00:34:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it itself, and you ignore what they can do downstream, you should</v>

00:34:59.280 --> 00:35:02.400
<v Speaker 2>want to have the actual word of God, not something that has</v>

00:35:02.400 --> 00:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>been edited by the rabbis.</v>

00:35:04.960 --> 00:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Even if there were no importance</v>

00:35:07.840 --> 00:35:12.320
<v Speaker 2>outside of simply being accurate numbers, you should want to have the</v>

00:35:12.320 --> 00:35:13.040
<v Speaker 2>accurate numbers.</v>

00:35:13.040 --> 00:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You should want to have</v>

00:35:14.480 --> 00:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>what God gave to Moses to record for his church.</v>

00:35:20.160 --> 00:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Instead of what the rabbis have decided, they would rather have</v>

00:35:26.800 --> 00:35:30.960
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the changes to Genesis 11's chronology, it becomes</v>

00:35:30.960 --> 00:35:32.560
<v Speaker 3>even more blatant.</v>

00:35:32.560 --> 00:35:37.280
<v Speaker 3>In Genesis 11, we have about 780 years that are deleted.</v>

00:35:37.280 --> 00:35:39.600
<v Speaker 3>And they're not deleted haphazardly.</v>

00:35:39.840 --> 00:35:44.560
<v Speaker 3>They're deleted on precise century marks.</v>

00:35:44.560 --> 00:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

00:35:45.760 --> 00:35:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Shem is about 100 when his son is born, and then his</v>

00:35:49.600 --> 00:35:54.400
<v Speaker 3>son when his begetting age, instead of being a hundred and thirty-five,</v>

00:35:54.400 --> 00:35:57.840
<v Speaker 3>as it is in the Septuagint, in the rabbinic text it's thirty</v>

00:35:57.920 --> 00:36:00.560
<v Speaker 3>five. So we go from a hundred to thirty-five.</v>

00:36:00.560 --> 00:36:05.680
<v Speaker 3>And then continuously from Shem through Tara, we we see I'm just</v>

00:36:05.680 --> 00:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna give you the dates from the Septuagint and you know these</v>

00:36:09.440 --> 00:36:11.200
<v Speaker 3>bunch of numbers, but they're all basically the same.</v>

00:36:11.280 --> 00:36:18.320
<v Speaker 3>100, 135, 130, another 130, 134, 130, 132, 130, 79,</v>

00:36:18.400 --> 00:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>130. So in the Septuagint they all had their son at about</v>

00:36:24.480 --> 00:36:27.200
<v Speaker 3>the same time, virtually the same age every time.</v>

00:36:27.200 --> 00:36:31.280
<v Speaker 3>There's complete consistency, with the one exception of Nahor.</v>

00:36:31.280 --> 00:36:35.360
<v Speaker 3>In the rabbinic text, you have a hundred for Shem, and then</v>

00:36:36.000 --> 00:36:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Tara has a hundred and thirty, and all of them in between</v>

00:36:40.560 --> 00:36:47.040
<v Speaker 3>have a century deleted, except for Shem's grandson Canaan, who is deleted</v>

00:36:47.040 --> 00:36:52.480
<v Speaker 3>entirely. So an entire man is deleted from scripture, and then Nahor,</v>

00:36:52.480 --> 00:36:55.840
<v Speaker 3>who was last before Tara, because he only lived to be seventy</v>

00:36:55.840 --> 00:36:56.720
<v Speaker 3>nine years.</v>

00:36:56.720 --> 00:37:00.240
<v Speaker 3>They didn't delete a hundred years, they deleted fifty.</v>

00:37:00.240 --> 00:37:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So he went from seventy nine to twenty nine.</v>

00:37:02.960 --> 00:37:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, some of you have probably heard of forensic accounting.</v>

00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:12.480
<v Speaker 3>There are certain tells when someone has been messing with numbers in</v>

00:37:12.480 --> 00:37:17.760
<v Speaker 3>a spreadsheet, in somebody's books for finances, that makes it very clear</v>

00:37:18.080 --> 00:37:21.120
<v Speaker 3>that human hands were involved.</v>

00:37:21.440 --> 00:37:26.000
<v Speaker 3>There's certain patterns that to us seem random and we think, well,</v>

00:37:26.000 --> 00:37:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing something very random when I change this value to that</v>

00:37:28.800 --> 00:37:31.600
<v Speaker 3>value that are not remotely random.</v>

00:37:31.600 --> 00:37:35.760
<v Speaker 3>And when a forensic accountant applies statistical analysis, they stick out like</v>

00:37:35.760 --> 00:37:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a sore thumb.</v>

00:37:37.040 --> 00:37:41.600
<v Speaker 3>You can prove in court that someone has manipulated a spreadsheet by</v>

00:37:41.600 --> 00:37:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the numbers that certain columns end in.</v>

00:37:44.240 --> 00:37:47.920
<v Speaker 3>That will hold up in court because it's provable science that when</v>

00:37:47.920 --> 00:37:52.000
<v Speaker 3>men go into something that's natural and alter it, they produce something</v>

00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:54.240
<v Speaker 3>that's detectably unnatural.</v>

00:37:54.240 --> 00:37:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, you don't need a forensic accountant at all here when you</v>

00:37:57.360 --> 00:38:00.400
<v Speaker 3>see going from a hundred to a bunch of guys in their</v>

00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>thirties to back to one thirty.</v>

00:38:03.120 --> 00:38:07.360
<v Speaker 3>And again, as Corey said the previous timeline, it drifted, it came</v>

00:38:07.360 --> 00:38:12.240
<v Speaker 3>down, but it shifted from the earliest begetting age of 130 for</v>

00:38:12.240 --> 00:38:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Adam or sorry, two hundred and thirty for Adam, one hundred and</v>

00:38:15.200 --> 00:38:18.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty, incidentally was the same one that we see in the rabbinic</v>

00:38:18.160 --> 00:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>text. Septuagint said Adam begat at two hundred thirty, and then they</v>

00:38:22.960 --> 00:38:26.720
<v Speaker 3>diminish slightly, but they never go below about one hundred and sixty</v>

00:38:26.720 --> 00:38:32.080
<v Speaker 3>two. Suddenly, after Shem, it falls off a cliff, and we lose</v>

00:38:32.080 --> 00:38:37.120
<v Speaker 3>an entire century for seven centuries, and we lose an entire man.</v>

00:38:37.120 --> 00:38:39.360
<v Speaker 3>This is so blatant in its manipulation</v>

00:38:40.640 --> 00:38:46.880
<v Speaker 3>that you can only possibly conclude that either the Septuagint was manipulated</v>

00:38:46.880 --> 00:38:51.360
<v Speaker 3>to come up with numbers that are entirely consistent, both with history</v>

00:38:51.440 --> 00:38:57.120
<v Speaker 3>and with the way numbers behave, or that the rabbinic text was</v>

00:38:57.440 --> 00:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>radically altered by people who were, as I said, ham fisted.</v>

00:39:01.040 --> 00:39:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Like, this is not subtle.</v>

00:39:03.280 --> 00:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Chopping off a one, literally removing a digit from every number, except</v>

00:39:07.840 --> 00:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for the man you delete entirely, or you know, because Nahor only</v>

00:39:11.680 --> 00:39:14.720
<v Speaker 3>begat at seventy nine, they had to switch that to twenty-nine.</v>

00:39:14.720 --> 00:39:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Because if they deleted a century from him, he would have been</v>

00:39:17.360 --> 00:39:19.760
<v Speaker 3>begetting before he was himself born.</v>

00:39:19.760 --> 00:39:21.520
<v Speaker 3>That's how blatant it is.</v>

00:39:21.520 --> 00:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not believable.</v>

00:39:23.920 --> 00:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And this is important because this is a timeline that goes directly</v>

00:39:27.120 --> 00:39:29.040
<v Speaker 3>to the flood chronology.</v>

00:39:29.040 --> 00:39:32.800
<v Speaker 3>The previous one doesn't matter so much, this one matters a great</v>

00:39:32.800 --> 00:39:38.880
<v Speaker 3>deal. We have lost almost eight hundred years here in Genesis eleven.</v>

00:39:38.880 --> 00:39:43.840
<v Speaker 3>It was deliberately removed, and as Corey said, like it doesn't even</v>

00:39:43.840 --> 00:39:45.920
<v Speaker 3>matter what their purpose was.</v>

00:39:45.920 --> 00:39:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And it also doesn't matter particularly which numbers you use.</v>

00:39:49.600 --> 00:39:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Like if we're just making up numbers, you know, one's as good</v>

00:39:52.160 --> 00:39:53.040
<v Speaker 3>as another.</v>

00:39:53.040 --> 00:39:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Except we're talking about scripture.</v>

00:39:55.680 --> 00:39:58.240
<v Speaker 3>If God said it, that means it's true.</v>

00:39:58.240 --> 00:40:01.760
<v Speaker 3>And as I've said, I think in the last episode, the way</v>

00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Revelation ends should terrorize anyone who would take lightly altering scripture.</v>

00:40:07.840 --> 00:40:12.960
<v Speaker 3>God promises that every curse, every plague in this book will be</v>

00:40:12.960 --> 00:40:16.560
<v Speaker 3>brought upon any man who changes a single thing about it.</v>

00:40:16.560 --> 00:40:21.040
<v Speaker 3>The changes here are not subtle, they're not small, and they're not</v>

00:40:21.040 --> 00:40:24.480
<v Speaker 3>insignificant. That's a big deal.</v>

00:40:24.480 --> 00:40:25.840
<v Speaker 3>All by itself, it's a big deal.</v>

00:40:25.840 --> 00:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Even if it didn't, as Corey said, it still matters.</v>

00:40:28.640 --> 00:40:30.960
<v Speaker 3>We should still care about getting it right.</v>

00:40:30.960 --> 00:40:34.640
<v Speaker 3>And when you actually look, we'll provide, I said both these tables</v>

00:40:34.640 --> 00:40:36.720
<v Speaker 3>will be in the length that I provide again.</v>

00:40:36.720 --> 00:40:39.680
<v Speaker 3>We're We're not vouching for the link to the I think it's</v>

00:40:39.680 --> 00:40:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Bible.ca has a very exhaustive examination.</v>

00:40:43.600 --> 00:40:47.200
<v Speaker 3>These numbers won't exactly align with the numbers that Corey mentioned.</v>

00:40:47.440 --> 00:40:49.920
<v Speaker 3>He said the hundred and eighty-eight for Lamek.</v>

00:40:49.920 --> 00:40:51.760
<v Speaker 3>This table says 162.</v>

00:40:51.760 --> 00:40:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't matter.</v>

00:40:52.480 --> 00:40:53.920
<v Speaker 3>And there's a footnote there on the table.</v>

00:40:53.920 --> 00:40:54.880
<v Speaker 3>So you can read.</v>

00:40:54.880 --> 00:40:57.600
<v Speaker 3>We're not vouching for those numbers and saying you have to believe</v>

00:40:57.600 --> 00:41:00.160
<v Speaker 3>this. So the reason I keep pointing this out is if you</v>

00:41:00.160 --> 00:41:02.720
<v Speaker 3>were to write down every single date and time that we're going</v>

00:41:02.720 --> 00:41:06.160
<v Speaker 3>to mention here and try to reconcile all of them, it's entirely</v>

00:41:06.160 --> 00:41:07.760
<v Speaker 3>possible they won't line up.</v>

00:41:07.760 --> 00:41:08.720
<v Speaker 3>That's okay.</v>

00:41:08.720 --> 00:41:13.120
<v Speaker 3>When we're looking at different points of reference, something's gonna move.</v>

00:41:13.280 --> 00:41:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I can tell me from experience, having spent a lot of time</v>

00:41:17.440 --> 00:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>doing my own investigation of some other timelines, whenever you pick a</v>

00:41:22.000 --> 00:41:26.160
<v Speaker 3>point as a reference point and start counting forward from it, you</v>

00:41:26.160 --> 00:41:29.680
<v Speaker 3>can You can have something that seems very consistent, makes perfect sense.</v>

00:41:29.680 --> 00:41:32.560
<v Speaker 3>But then you take a different point somewhere in the future in</v>

00:41:32.560 --> 00:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>scripture and try to count backwards from there.</v>

00:41:35.600 --> 00:41:39.600
<v Speaker 3>It's frequently the case that you've made some mistake that will cause</v>

00:41:39.600 --> 00:41:40.480
<v Speaker 3>them not to line up.</v>

00:41:40.720 --> 00:41:44.560
<v Speaker 3>So there's no precision alignment in the different dates.</v>

00:41:44.560 --> 00:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly been going to be the case with the numbers we're</v>

00:41:46.880 --> 00:41:47.520
<v Speaker 3>using here.</v>

00:41:47.520 --> 00:41:51.280
<v Speaker 3>So don't hold us to the specifics of claims of hundred and</v>

00:41:51.280 --> 00:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>eighty-eight versus hundred and eighty-two, It doesn't matter.</v>

00:41:54.000 --> 00:41:55.680
<v Speaker 3>One of 'em is right.</v>

00:41:55.680 --> 00:41:59.840
<v Speaker 3>But I only highlight it because if someone wants to play gotcha,</v>

00:41:59.840 --> 00:42:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I say, well, this is six years different, therefore it's all fake.</v>

00:42:04.160 --> 00:42:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Don't be like that.</v>

00:42:05.280 --> 00:42:07.680
<v Speaker 3>That's reddit tier theology.</v>

00:42:07.680 --> 00:42:11.680
<v Speaker 3>That's what Redditors do, atheists do, when they look at scripture, they</v>

00:42:11.680 --> 00:42:13.920
<v Speaker 3>play those games of gotcha.</v>

00:42:13.920 --> 00:42:17.200
<v Speaker 3>It's really important when we're looking at this stuff to try to</v>

00:42:17.200 --> 00:42:19.600
<v Speaker 3>understand it, to try to reconcile it is men have been doing</v>

00:42:19.600 --> 00:42:20.560
<v Speaker 3>for 2000 years.</v>

00:42:20.560 --> 00:42:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Like this work is nothing new.</v>

00:42:22.320 --> 00:42:25.360
<v Speaker 3>This the website is from 2017.</v>

00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>For 2,000 years, Christian men have been trying to figure this stuff</v>

00:42:29.120 --> 00:42:30.800
<v Speaker 3>out. It's a salutary endeavor.</v>

00:42:30.800 --> 00:42:33.360
<v Speaker 3>It's one I have no personal interest in, which is why I</v>

00:42:33.360 --> 00:42:37.120
<v Speaker 3>don't personally have strongly held beliefs one way or another about which</v>

00:42:37.120 --> 00:42:38.800
<v Speaker 3>is exactly accurate.</v>

00:42:38.800 --> 00:42:43.040
<v Speaker 3>What I do care about is that internally scripture adds up with</v>

00:42:43.040 --> 00:42:46.320
<v Speaker 3>itself. And so there are places where there's wiggle room.</v>

00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:49.120
<v Speaker 3>As Corey and I were talking about this last week before we</v>

00:42:49.120 --> 00:42:53.040
<v Speaker 3>began recording the our aborted attempt, we don't know how long it</v>

00:42:53.040 --> 00:42:55.920
<v Speaker 3>was between the creation of Adam and the fall.</v>

00:42:55.920 --> 00:42:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Personally, I think it's less than a year.</v>

00:42:57.360 --> 00:42:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's probably a lot less.</v>

00:42:58.560 --> 00:42:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Does scripture say that?</v>

00:42:59.680 --> 00:43:01.280
<v Speaker 3>No. Could it have been longer?</v>

00:43:01.280 --> 00:43:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. So we can't make we can make assumptions, but we can't</v>

00:43:06.240 --> 00:43:09.600
<v Speaker 3>hold them as religious beliefs.</v>

00:43:09.600 --> 00:43:11.280
<v Speaker 3>We can't go wild about it.</v>

00:43:11.280 --> 00:43:14.640
<v Speaker 3>We can't be absurd because you know, if Adam's first begetting date</v>

00:43:14.640 --> 00:43:18.800
<v Speaker 3>was two hundred and thirty years, Genesis is simply silent about how</v>

00:43:18.800 --> 00:43:21.760
<v Speaker 3>long they were in the garden, how long after they were out</v>

00:43:21.760 --> 00:43:22.640
<v Speaker 3>of the garden.</v>

00:43:23.120 --> 00:43:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Was the child born?</v>

00:43:24.880 --> 00:43:26.160
<v Speaker 3>We don't know.</v>

00:43:26.160 --> 00:43:29.920
<v Speaker 3>You can piously speculate, but what you can't do is draw firm</v>

00:43:29.920 --> 00:43:33.520
<v Speaker 3>conclusions from your speculation and then extrapolate from those.</v>

00:43:33.520 --> 00:43:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Because what you're gonna end up doing with any of these timelines</v>

00:43:36.240 --> 00:43:38.640
<v Speaker 3>is making a mess somewhere else.</v>

00:43:38.640 --> 00:43:42.240
<v Speaker 3>That's precisely what the rabbis did here when they messed with Genesis</v>

00:43:42.320 --> 00:43:43.840
<v Speaker 3>5 and with Genesis 11.</v>

00:43:43.840 --> 00:43:46.720
<v Speaker 3>They made these changes to solve a problem that they had, and</v>

00:43:46.720 --> 00:43:50.080
<v Speaker 3>they created a much bigger mess that is very easy for us</v>

00:43:50.080 --> 00:43:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to clean up.</v>

00:43:50.560 --> 00:43:53.040
<v Speaker 3>We just have to go back to what the early church confessed.</v>

00:43:53.040 --> 00:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>The early church used the Septuagint and frequently quoted the timeline that</v>

00:43:58.160 --> 00:44:00.240
<v Speaker 3>actually makes sense, that looks sane.</v>

00:44:00.240 --> 00:44:02.480
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the table, you'll laugh.</v>

00:44:02.480 --> 00:44:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Visually, it's absurd, especially the Genesis eleven table.</v>

00:44:06.800 --> 00:44:09.440
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd how blatant the changes are.</v>

00:44:09.440 --> 00:44:12.640
<v Speaker 3>You can decide for yourself which one you find to be credible,</v>

00:44:12.640 --> 00:44:16.240
<v Speaker 3>but just keep in mind, someone was messing with something here, and</v>

00:44:16.240 --> 00:44:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that's a big deal.</v>

00:44:17.360 --> 00:44:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Our contention, and as we've said repeatedly, the closing argument for all</v>

00:44:21.280 --> 00:44:25.200
<v Speaker 3>of this is gonna be last couple episodes, where we just go</v>

00:44:25.200 --> 00:44:29.200
<v Speaker 3>through and quote the places where the New Testament quotes the Septuagint</v>

00:44:29.760 --> 00:44:33.040
<v Speaker 3>opposed to the Rabbinic text, where it says things that are not</v>

00:44:33.040 --> 00:44:35.440
<v Speaker 3>found in the Rabbinic text at all, but are found in the</v>

00:44:35.440 --> 00:44:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Septuagint. The New Testament validates the Septuagint as scripture.</v>

00:44:40.240 --> 00:44:43.600
<v Speaker 3>So when we are treating it as scripture here, it is not</v>

00:44:43.600 --> 00:44:45.840
<v Speaker 3>personal hubris or ego.</v>

00:44:45.840 --> 00:44:49.520
<v Speaker 3>It is with full confidence that Christ and his apostles were not</v>

00:44:49.520 --> 00:44:52.160
<v Speaker 3>wrong when they called it scripture.</v>

00:44:52.160 --> 00:44:55.920
<v Speaker 3>One last minor point that doesn't tie directly to any of this,</v>

00:44:55.920 --> 00:44:58.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's a chronological point that's really important.</v>

00:44:58.400 --> 00:45:00.400
<v Speaker 3>And the reason I came to mind is that a couple of</v>

00:45:00.400 --> 00:45:05.280
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, in part in preparation for this episode, I rewatched the</v>

00:45:05.280 --> 00:45:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Darren Aronofsky movie called Noah, which is an abomination.</v>

00:45:09.760 --> 00:45:15.440
<v Speaker 3>He's a horrible Jewish director who made hideous blasphemous changes.</v>

00:45:15.440 --> 00:45:18.560
<v Speaker 3>The reason I watched it is that I wanted to know what</v>

00:45:18.560 --> 00:45:22.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of pop culture influences were kind of floating around.</v>

00:45:22.240 --> 00:45:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Because that's where we get most of our theology now.</v>

00:45:25.440 --> 00:45:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, people think that when you die you get a harp</v>

00:45:28.000 --> 00:45:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and wings and become an angel in heaven because of Hallmark greeting</v>

00:45:31.200 --> 00:45:34.720
<v Speaker 3>cards. That's pretty much a level of theology inside the church most</v>

00:45:34.720 --> 00:45:35.760
<v Speaker 3>of the time.</v>

00:45:35.760 --> 00:45:40.720
<v Speaker 3>So you may think it's silly that someone would derive their knowledge</v>

00:45:40.720 --> 00:45:44.800
<v Speaker 3>of scripture from a Hollywood movie called Noah.</v>

00:45:44.800 --> 00:45:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I promise you there are people who believe that stuff is real.</v>

00:45:47.840 --> 00:45:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Even if they don't do so consciously, they just internalize it.</v>

00:45:51.680 --> 00:45:56.240
<v Speaker 3>One of the crucial things that stood out in that movie, and</v>

00:45:56.240 --> 00:46:01.600
<v Speaker 3>as you frequently find it in discourse, was the claim that Shem</v>

00:46:01.600 --> 00:46:03.120
<v Speaker 3>was the oldest.</v>

00:46:03.120 --> 00:46:07.360
<v Speaker 3>We frequently see this made that Japus was younger and Shem was</v>

00:46:07.360 --> 00:46:13.360
<v Speaker 3>older. There's potentially some ambiguity in the rabbinic text in Genesis when</v>

00:46:13.360 --> 00:46:16.720
<v Speaker 3>it describes this, I think that you can make a clear argument</v>

00:46:16.720 --> 00:46:19.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's not ambiguous, but that's the problem with ambiguity.</v>

00:46:19.680 --> 00:46:22.320
<v Speaker 3>As soon as somebody's well, I don't think that's clear at all.</v>

00:46:22.320 --> 00:46:23.520
<v Speaker 3>What are you gonna do?</v>

00:46:23.520 --> 00:46:26.480
<v Speaker 3>If you think it's clear and they think it's not clear, even</v>

00:46:26.480 --> 00:46:30.880
<v Speaker 3>if they're being stupid and recalcitrant, to some degree it may not</v>

00:46:30.880 --> 00:46:33.680
<v Speaker 3>be clear, if they're not being completely irrational.</v>

00:46:33.680 --> 00:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>There's an important note to be made here that when we're looking</v>

00:46:36.960 --> 00:46:43.040
<v Speaker 3>at the Septuagint verses that discuss Noah and Shem and Japh.</v>

00:46:43.040 --> 00:46:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Septuagin Genesis eleven ten states clearly that Sem fathered Arphaxed two</v>

00:46:50.160 --> 00:46:52.000
<v Speaker 3>years after the flood.</v>

00:46:52.000 --> 00:46:56.000
<v Speaker 3>In Genesis five hundred thirty two notes that Noah began fathering at</v>

00:46:56.000 --> 00:47:01.680
<v Speaker 3>five hundred, and in Genesis ten twenty one it says very directly,</v>

00:47:01.680 --> 00:47:05.840
<v Speaker 3>and to Sam himself also were sons born, the father of all</v>

00:47:05.840 --> 00:47:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the sons Hebrew the brother of Japheth the elder.</v>

00:47:10.320 --> 00:47:14.720
<v Speaker 3>So the phrasing in the Greek is similar somewhat to the phrasing</v>

00:47:14.720 --> 00:47:18.880
<v Speaker 3>in the Hebrew referring to brother Japheth the Elder.</v>

00:47:18.880 --> 00:47:23.120
<v Speaker 3>The difference is the Hebrew is a sloppy, fake, messed up language,</v>

00:47:23.120 --> 00:47:24.080
<v Speaker 3>and Greek is not.</v>

00:47:24.080 --> 00:47:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Greek is very meticulous about this stuff.</v>

00:47:26.240 --> 00:47:28.880
<v Speaker 3>So in the Greek, when it says the brother of Japheth the</v>

00:47:28.880 --> 00:47:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Elder, there can be no ambiguity that the elder is modifying Japheth,</v>

00:47:34.240 --> 00:47:39.120
<v Speaker 3>which is in perfect accord with Genesis 532 and 1110.</v>

00:47:39.120 --> 00:47:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Genesis 1110 is very clear the Shem</v>

00:47:44.480 --> 00:47:48.400
<v Speaker 3>first gave birth when he was a hundred two years after the</v>

00:47:48.400 --> 00:47:51.920
<v Speaker 3>flood. So the only way that makes sense if is if Japheth</v>

00:47:51.920 --> 00:47:53.200
<v Speaker 3>is the oldest.</v>

00:47:53.200 --> 00:47:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Which makes perfect sense when you're looking at the blessing given to</v>

00:47:57.680 --> 00:48:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Sam above Japheth.</v>

00:48:00.640 --> 00:48:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that Shem is younger, and that he was given</v>

00:48:03.520 --> 00:48:07.280
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of blessing than Japheth, and that Japheth was older</v>

00:48:07.440 --> 00:48:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and was given a double blessing, but not all the blessings.</v>

00:48:10.960 --> 00:48:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Shem was given a very particular blessing that only applied to Japheth</v>

00:48:16.560 --> 00:48:20.640
<v Speaker 3>by him dwelling in his tents later on, referring to his progeny</v>

00:48:21.040 --> 00:48:22.640
<v Speaker 3>being the church.</v>

00:48:22.640 --> 00:48:27.120
<v Speaker 3>It makes perfect sense that Shem is younger and that Shem was</v>

00:48:27.440 --> 00:48:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the father of those who begat Jesus.</v>

00:48:30.400 --> 00:48:32.080
<v Speaker 3>That's how God does stuff.</v>

00:48:32.080 --> 00:48:33.600
<v Speaker 3>It happened with Jacob and Esau.</v>

00:48:33.760 --> 00:48:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Like it happens all the time.</v>

00:48:35.520 --> 00:48:39.200
<v Speaker 3>So it's not necessary also for Shem to be the oldest.</v>

00:48:39.200 --> 00:48:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Again, it's one of these places where it's absurd some of the</v>

00:48:42.320 --> 00:48:47.440
<v Speaker 3>changes that are made to try to seem as though the stories</v>

00:48:47.440 --> 00:48:51.840
<v Speaker 3>that the Jews tell have a greater degree of primacy than they</v>

00:48:51.840 --> 00:48:55.120
<v Speaker 3>need, because the truth is very favorable.</v>

00:48:55.120 --> 00:48:57.680
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna get at the end to some of the prayers and</v>

00:48:57.680 --> 00:49:00.400
<v Speaker 3>some of the things that are removed from Esther They make the</v>

00:49:00.400 --> 00:49:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Jews look great, and they still deleted them.</v>

00:49:03.040 --> 00:49:05.120
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd some of the changes that were made.</v>

00:49:05.280 --> 00:49:08.160
<v Speaker 3>They're not only deleting stuff that makes them look bad, they're deleting</v>

00:49:08.160 --> 00:49:09.840
<v Speaker 3>stuff that makes them look good.</v>

00:49:09.840 --> 00:49:13.760
<v Speaker 3>But they did it for related reasons that were worse.</v>

00:49:13.760 --> 00:49:18.480
<v Speaker 3>It was enough for them to manipulate the text to delete things</v>

00:49:18.480 --> 00:49:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that actually make the lineage of Jacob look good because they wanted</v>

00:49:23.360 --> 00:49:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to do other harm.</v>

00:49:24.480 --> 00:49:25.680
<v Speaker 3>It's unbelievable.</v>

00:49:25.680 --> 00:49:27.840
<v Speaker 3>But when you look internally at the text, you don't need to</v>

00:49:27.840 --> 00:49:31.760
<v Speaker 3>refer to early church fathers or heaven forbid podcasters to reach the</v>

00:49:31.760 --> 00:49:32.720
<v Speaker 3>same conclusions.</v>

00:49:32.720 --> 00:49:36.160
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the Septuagint text and you compare it, you</v>

00:49:36.160 --> 00:49:38.800
<v Speaker 3>can only reach these conclusions.</v>

00:49:38.800 --> 00:49:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And And I was thinking earlier today that we've highlighted a number</v>

00:49:41.920 --> 00:49:44.480
<v Speaker 3>of different things in the Septuagint.</v>

00:49:44.480 --> 00:49:46.960
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh, this is really important, this is really interesting.</v>

00:49:46.960 --> 00:49:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't want anyone to get the impression that anything that we</v>

00:49:49.760 --> 00:49:53.280
<v Speaker 3>highlight in this series is the most interesting or the most important</v>

00:49:53.680 --> 00:49:56.000
<v Speaker 3>thing that you're gonna find in the Septuagint.</v>

00:49:56.000 --> 00:49:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea what that's gonna be.</v>

00:49:58.000 --> 00:50:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Every time, Corey or I look, we find more.</v>

00:50:01.040 --> 00:50:04.480
<v Speaker 3>We find a greater depth of alteration, we find a greater depth</v>

00:50:04.480 --> 00:50:07.600
<v Speaker 3>of wisdom and consistency with the rest of Scripture.</v>

00:50:07.600 --> 00:50:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a delight to be reading the Septuagint.</v>

00:50:10.160 --> 00:50:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea what the juiciest thing in here is.</v>

00:50:12.960 --> 00:50:17.840
<v Speaker 3>As we've said repeatedly, there are centuries of Christian theology ahead of</v>

00:50:17.840 --> 00:50:22.320
<v Speaker 3>us. The scholarship that has yet to be done by the Christian</v>

00:50:22.320 --> 00:50:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Church, especially in English, it's never been done in English.</v>

00:50:25.680 --> 00:50:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Not once.</v>

00:50:26.560 --> 00:50:31.920
<v Speaker 3>There's not been any theology done in English about the Septuagint that</v>

00:50:31.920 --> 00:50:34.960
<v Speaker 3>was not in view of listening to the rabbis lies.</v>

00:50:34.960 --> 00:50:38.400
<v Speaker 3>This is the very most exciting time we've had in church history,</v>

00:50:38.400 --> 00:50:41.280
<v Speaker 3>to be in a place where we can actually fix these problems</v>

00:50:41.280 --> 00:50:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and be faithful in a way that our fathers failed to be,</v>

00:50:44.880 --> 00:50:48.560
<v Speaker 3>in a way that's consistent with the New Testament, consistent with Scripture</v>

00:50:48.560 --> 00:50:52.880
<v Speaker 3>itself, as I said earlier, even consistent with your rabbinic text Bible,</v>

00:50:52.880 --> 00:50:56.160
<v Speaker 3>which repeatedly throws out what the rabbis said, because it didn't make</v>

00:50:56.160 --> 00:50:56.560
<v Speaker 3>any sense.</v>

00:50:56.560 --> 00:50:58.560
<v Speaker 3>So why they do they resort to the Greek?</v>

00:50:58.560 --> 00:51:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's just resort to the Greek hundred percent.</v>

00:51:01.200 --> 00:51:02.640
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna clear everything</v>

00:51:02.640 --> 00:51:03.920
up.

00:51:04.080 --> 00:51:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Before we move on to the next part of this episode, there</v>

00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:13.360
<v Speaker 2>is one minor chronological or timeline point that we need to address</v>

00:51:13.440 --> 00:51:17.200
<v Speaker 2>because undoubtedly it will come up in the future it is a</v>

00:51:17.200 --> 00:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>relevant difference between the Masoretic text and the Septuagint.</v>

00:51:23.040 --> 00:51:27.280
<v Speaker 2>And that is the timeline of the Exodus, which is to say,</v>

00:51:27.280 --> 00:51:31.360
<v Speaker 2>does it include the time in Canaan or does it exclude the</v>

00:51:31.360 --> 00:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>time in Canaan?</v>

00:51:32.480 --> 00:51:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And you'll see exactly why that is a question when I read</v>

00:51:36.240 --> 00:51:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a few passages from scripture here.</v>

00:51:38.640 --> 00:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I am going to read from Exodus twelve, Galatians three, Acts seven,</v>

00:51:44.160 --> 00:51:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and Acts thirteen.</v>

00:51:46.080 --> 00:51:49.360
<v Speaker 2>There are a handful of specific verses that are relevant, but I</v>

00:51:49.360 --> 00:51:52.880
<v Speaker 2>am also going to read some context, because it is generally important</v>

00:51:52.880 --> 00:51:55.360
<v Speaker 2>to have context in these things.</v>

00:51:55.360 --> 00:51:58.880
<v Speaker 2>And so starting with Exodus twelve, I will read first from the</v>

00:51:58.880 --> 00:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Masoretic text, the ESV of course, and then I will read from</v>

00:52:02.480 --> 00:52:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the Lexum.</v>

00:52:04.400 --> 00:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>The time that the people of Israel lived in Egypt was four</v>

00:52:07.680 --> 00:52:09.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty years.</v>

00:52:09.360 --> 00:52:12.320
<v Speaker 2>At the end of four hundred and thirty years on that very</v>

00:52:12.320 --> 00:52:15.440
<v Speaker 2>day all the hosts of the Lord went out from the land</v>

00:52:15.440 --> 00:52:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of Egypt.</v>

00:52:16.880 --> 00:52:19.440
<v Speaker 2>And now from the Septuagint.</v>

00:52:19.440 --> 00:52:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Now the sojourn of the sons of Israel, during which they lived</v>

00:52:22.720 --> 00:52:26.160
<v Speaker 2>in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, was</v>

00:52:26.160 --> 00:52:30.080
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty years, and it happened after the four hundred</v>

00:52:30.080 --> 00:52:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and thirty years, all the hosts of the Lord went forth from</v>

00:52:33.360 --> 00:52:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the land of Egypt by night.</v>

00:52:36.320 --> 00:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>You can see the salient difference between these two, of course, and</v>

00:52:40.080 --> 00:52:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that is, the phrase that is included in the Septuagint and in</v>

00:52:44.400 --> 00:52:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the land of Canaan that is absent from the rabbinic text.</v>

00:52:48.560 --> 00:52:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is, was there a short sojourn in Egypt</v>

00:52:53.120 --> 00:52:56.240
<v Speaker 2>or was there a long sojourn in Egypt?</v>

00:52:56.240 --> 00:53:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Was it four hundred and thirty years, in Egypt alone, or was</v>

00:53:00.720 --> 00:53:05.520
<v Speaker 2>it four hundred and thirty years, part of that being in Canaan?</v>

00:53:05.520 --> 00:53:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Traditionally, a number of Christian exegetes, particularly in the early church when</v>

00:53:10.640 --> 00:53:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they were indeed using the Septuagint as their Bible, basically divided it</v>

00:53:15.520 --> 00:53:18.800
<v Speaker 2>into a period of two hundred and fifteen years in Canaan and</v>

00:53:18.800 --> 00:53:23.120
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifteen years in Egypt, giving the short sojourn in</v>

00:53:23.120 --> 00:53:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Egypt. It is worth noting here in passing there are some manuscripts</v>

00:53:27.040 --> 00:53:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of the Septuagint that have what appears to be a scribal error</v>

00:53:31.040 --> 00:53:34.560
<v Speaker 2>adding a five at the end of four hundred and thirty, yielding</v>

00:53:34.560 --> 00:53:38.640
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty five, however the majority position as it were</v>

00:53:38.720 --> 00:53:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of all the manuscripts is four hundred and thirty, so that does</v>

00:53:42.240 --> 00:53:47.680
<v Speaker 2>happen to agree with the total given in the rabbinic text, the</v>

00:53:47.680 --> 00:53:53.360
<v Speaker 2>difference is where those years of sojourning took place, is Canaan included.</v>

00:53:53.360 --> 00:53:57.920
<v Speaker 2>And so I will also read from Galatians three and Acts seven</v>

00:53:58.000 --> 00:53:58.240
<v Speaker 2>now</v>

00:54:00.320 --> 00:54:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to give a human example, brothers, even with a man made covenant,</v>

00:54:04.240 --> 00:54:06.720
<v Speaker 2>no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been</v>

00:54:06.720 --> 00:54:11.040
<v Speaker 2>ratified. Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring.</v>

00:54:11.040 --> 00:54:15.280
<v Speaker 2>It does not say and to offsprings, referring to many, but referring</v>

00:54:15.280 --> 00:54:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to one, and to your offspring, who is Christ.</v>

00:54:18.720 --> 00:54:20.240
<v Speaker 2>This is what I mean.</v>

00:54:20.240 --> 00:54:23.680
<v Speaker 2>The law, which came four hundred and thirty years afterward, does not</v>

00:54:23.680 --> 00:54:27.840
<v Speaker 2>annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the</v>

00:54:27.840 --> 00:54:31.760
<v Speaker 2>promise void, for if the inheritance comes by the law, it no</v>

00:54:31.760 --> 00:54:35.840
<v Speaker 2>longer comes by promise, but God gave it to Abraham by a</v>

00:54:35.840 --> 00:54:36.480
<v Speaker 2>promise</v>

00:54:38.640 --> 00:54:41.840
<v Speaker 2>And the high priest said, Are these things so?</v>

00:54:41.840 --> 00:54:46.160
<v Speaker 2>And Stephen said, Brothers and fathers, hear me, the God of glory</v>

00:54:46.320 --> 00:54:50.160
<v Speaker 2>appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he</v>

00:54:50.160 --> 00:54:53.920
<v Speaker 2>lived in Haran, and said to him, Go out from your land</v>

00:54:54.080 --> 00:54:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and from your kindred, and go into the land that I will</v>

00:54:57.040 --> 00:54:57.920
<v Speaker 2>show you.</v>

00:54:57.920 --> 00:55:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and lived</v>

00:55:00.640 --> 00:55:04.480
<v Speaker 2>in Haran, and after his father died, God removed him from there</v>

00:55:04.960 --> 00:55:08.080
<v Speaker 2>into this land in which you are now living, yet he gave</v>

00:55:08.080 --> 00:55:11.920
<v Speaker 2>him no inheritance in it, not even a foot's length, but promised</v>

00:55:11.920 --> 00:55:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to give it to him as a possession and to his offspring</v>

00:55:14.480 --> 00:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>after him, though he had no child, and God spoke to this</v>

00:55:17.920 --> 00:55:21.840
<v Speaker 2>effect, that his offspring would be sojourners in a land belonging to</v>

00:55:21.840 --> 00:55:25.680
<v Speaker 2>others, who would enslave them and afflict them four hundred years.</v>

00:55:25.680 --> 00:55:29.040
<v Speaker 2>But I will judge the nation that they serve, said God, and</v>

00:55:29.040 --> 00:55:31.520
<v Speaker 2>after that they will come out and worship me in this place</v>

00:55:31.840 --> 00:55:34.080
<v Speaker 2>This place.</v>

00:55:34.080 --> 00:55:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Some will read these two passages and try to raise an additional</v>

00:55:38.080 --> 00:55:44.960
<v Speaker 2>question about the period in Canaan and Egypt, about the sojourning period.</v>

00:55:44.960 --> 00:55:48.240
<v Speaker 2>And they will try to say, well one says four hundred years,</v>

00:55:48.240 --> 00:55:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Stephen, and one says four hundred and thirty years, Paul.</v>

00:55:52.400 --> 00:55:55.920
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is, is it four hundred and thirty years</v>

00:55:56.080 --> 00:56:01.360
<v Speaker 2>as aligns, incidentally, with Exodus, or is it four hundred years?</v>

00:56:01.680 --> 00:56:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I personally do not take this particular contention very seriously.</v>

00:56:05.680 --> 00:56:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I simply agree with Augustine and other church fathers who said Who</v>

00:56:08.720 --> 00:56:10.640
<v Speaker 2>said, Stephen is rounding?</v>

00:56:10.640 --> 00:56:12.000
<v Speaker 2>We do this all the time.</v>

00:56:12.000 --> 00:56:15.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't often speak of the exact number of years of an</v>

00:56:15.360 --> 00:56:19.120
<v Speaker 2>event unless it's a relatively trivial number of years.</v>

00:56:19.120 --> 00:56:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Which basically means under twenty or so.</v>

00:56:21.760 --> 00:56:26.080
<v Speaker 2>If an event took three hundred and eighty seven years, we're probably</v>

00:56:26.080 --> 00:56:28.160
<v Speaker 2>just going to say it took four centuries.</v>

00:56:28.160 --> 00:56:31.200
<v Speaker 2>If it took four hundred and thirteen years, we're probably going to</v>

00:56:31.200 --> 00:56:32.880
<v Speaker 2>say it took four hundred years.</v>

00:56:32.880 --> 00:56:35.200
<v Speaker 2>This is simply how human beings speak.</v>

00:56:35.200 --> 00:56:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Stephen is giving a speech here, so he simply rounded.</v>

00:56:38.240 --> 00:56:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a fairly easy one to resolve.</v>

00:56:41.760 --> 00:56:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The final section I am going to read is from Acts thirteen.</v>

00:56:46.640 --> 00:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>So Paul stood up, and motioning with his hand said, Men of</v>

00:56:50.640 --> 00:56:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Israel and you who fear God listen.</v>

00:56:53.360 --> 00:56:56.880
<v Speaker 2>The God of this people Israel chose our fathers and made the</v>

00:56:56.880 --> 00:56:59.520
<v Speaker 2>people great during their stay in the land of Egypt.</v>

00:56:59.520 --> 00:57:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And with uplifted arm he led them out of it.</v>

00:57:02.640 --> 00:57:05.200
<v Speaker 2>And for about forty years he put up with them in the</v>

00:57:05.200 --> 00:57:09.360
<v Speaker 2>wilderness, and after destroying seven nations in the land of Canaan, he</v>

00:57:09.360 --> 00:57:11.520
<v Speaker 2>gave them their land as an inheritance.</v>

00:57:11.520 --> 00:57:15.280
<v Speaker 2>All this took about four hundred and fifty years, and after that</v>

00:57:15.280 --> 00:57:19.200
<v Speaker 2>he gave them judges until Samuel the prophet.</v>

00:57:19.200 --> 00:57:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Now there are those of course who will look at this and</v>

00:57:21.280 --> 00:57:23.920
<v Speaker 2>say well now we have a third number four hundred and fifty</v>

00:57:23.920 --> 00:57:28.960
<v Speaker 2>years. But they'll ignore what came directly before that, and after destroying</v>

00:57:28.960 --> 00:57:32.080
<v Speaker 2>seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land</v>

00:57:32.080 --> 00:57:33.760
<v Speaker 2>as an inheritance.</v>

00:57:33.760 --> 00:57:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Paul is talking about a period here that includes other things than</v>

00:57:38.080 --> 00:57:39.280
<v Speaker 2>just the sojourn.</v>

00:57:39.280 --> 00:57:43.200
<v Speaker 2>It includes the destruction of those seven nations, as it literally says</v>

00:57:43.200 --> 00:57:44.960
<v Speaker 2>there in the preceding verse.</v>

00:57:44.960 --> 00:57:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And so the four hundred and fifty year period does align with</v>

00:57:49.520 --> 00:57:51.360
<v Speaker 2>the four hundred and thirty year period.</v>

00:57:51.360 --> 00:57:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Paul is simply including something additional.</v>

00:57:54.720 --> 00:57:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And so what are we to make of this?</v>

00:57:57.040 --> 00:57:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the best way to look at this is we look</v>

00:57:59.520 --> 00:58:03.360
<v Speaker 2>at what Paul says in Galatians, and in Galatians he gives the</v>

00:58:03.360 --> 00:58:06.480
<v Speaker 2>number four hundred and thirty, he's giving a literal number.</v>

00:58:06.480 --> 00:58:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Because incidentally, when we look at how human beings speak about numbers</v>

00:58:10.800 --> 00:58:14.560
<v Speaker 2>like this, typically we round, but if we give a number that</v>

00:58:14.560 --> 00:58:19.040
<v Speaker 2>is not rounded, four hundred and thirty is not rounded, then we're</v>

00:58:19.040 --> 00:58:20.800
<v Speaker 2>probably speaking precisely.</v>

00:58:20.800 --> 00:58:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Paul here is speaking precisely, and the number that he gives aligns</v>

00:58:25.280 --> 00:58:28.560
<v Speaker 2>perfectly with the number given in Exodus.</v>

00:58:28.560 --> 00:58:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And so the only question that remains is whether or not the</v>

00:58:32.960 --> 00:58:36.560
<v Speaker 2>sojourn in Canaan is included, which is to say, is the sojourn</v>

00:58:36.560 --> 00:58:39.840
<v Speaker 2>in Egypt short or long?</v>

00:58:39.840 --> 00:58:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I am inclined to agree with the early church, and I think</v>

00:58:42.320 --> 00:58:45.840
<v Speaker 2>that is the correct The correct position on this, the early church,</v>

00:58:45.840 --> 00:58:50.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at the Septuagint, believed that the sojourn in Egypt was short,</v>

00:58:50.400 --> 00:58:53.440
<v Speaker 2>about two hundred and fifteen years, and then to get to that</v>

00:58:53.440 --> 00:58:56.640
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty year number, you have two hundred and fifteen</v>

00:58:56.720 --> 00:59:02.320
<v Speaker 2>years of Abram's or Abraham's sojourn in the land of Canaan.</v>

00:59:02.320 --> 00:59:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This is what many of the church fathers believed, this is what</v>

00:59:05.760 --> 00:59:09.520
<v Speaker 2>they argued over against the Jews who sometimes would argue for the</v>

00:59:10.000 --> 00:59:13.760
<v Speaker 2>longer period from whatever text they happen to be using at the</v>

00:59:13.760 --> 00:59:21.040
<v Speaker 2>time. The short Egyptian sojourn happens to harmonize with the genealogies</v>

00:59:21.040 --> 00:59:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and again with the words of Paul, and so I think that</v>

00:59:23.680 --> 00:59:25.280
<v Speaker 2>is the clear choice here.</v>

00:59:25.280 --> 00:59:27.760
<v Speaker 2>It is worth noting before we move on to the rest of</v>

00:59:27.760 --> 00:59:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the episode, simply because there are always going to be those who</v>

00:59:31.440 --> 00:59:37.520
<v Speaker 2>attempt to find supposed discrepancies, seeming inconsistencies in scripture, and try to</v>

00:59:37.920 --> 00:59:43.520
<v Speaker 2>discredit the word of God on the basis of those seeming inconsistencies.</v>

00:59:43.520 --> 00:59:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Typically what it comes down to is the inability of those who</v>

00:59:47.600 --> 00:59:52.640
<v Speaker 2>are advancing these supposed or seeming the seeming inconsistencies to actually read</v>

00:59:52.640 --> 00:59:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the text.</v>

00:59:53.760 --> 00:59:56.880
<v Speaker 2>In the case of Paul's speech in Acts, we'll have those who</v>

00:59:56.880 --> 00:59:59.040
<v Speaker 2>try to argue that he says four hundred and fifty so it</v>

00:59:59.040 --> 01:00:04.240
<v Speaker 2>must be inconsistent, but literally the previous verse explains the additional twenty</v>

01:00:04.240 --> 01:00:04.480
<v Speaker 2>years</v>

01:00:05.520 --> 01:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>This is simply a matter of reading the text carefully and believing</v>

01:00:09.200 --> 01:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>what it says.</v>

01:00:10.480 --> 01:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>There are things where we're going to have to map out exactly</v>

01:00:13.600 --> 01:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>what happened on the timeline, what happened when, which periods took place,</v>

01:00:18.800 --> 01:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>where, things like that.</v>

01:00:20.640 --> 01:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean the text is inconsistent or that the text</v>

01:00:24.560 --> 01:00:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is wrong.</v>

01:00:25.440 --> 01:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>What it means is that we have to read carefully, and some</v>

01:00:28.480 --> 01:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>of our preconceived notions or our previous beliefs, on the basis of</v>

01:00:33.680 --> 01:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the Masoretic, on the basis of the rabbinic text, they are simply</v>

01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be wrong in light of what we clearly see in</v>

01:00:40.560 --> 01:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the Septuagint.</v>

01:00:41.680 --> 01:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>And what the Septuagint says here is that they lived in the</v>

01:00:45.760 --> 01:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan during this sojourn,</v>

01:00:50.160 --> 01:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and so simply speaking, that is what we as Christians believe.</v>

01:00:56.640 --> 01:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>The bulk of this episode is undoubtedly going to be going over</v>

01:01:01.040 --> 01:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the differences in Esther, but before we get to Esther, we want</v>

01:01:05.600 --> 01:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>to spend some time in Job.</v>

01:01:07.760 --> 01:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Both of us like the book of Job.</v>

01:01:09.600 --> 01:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>We know that many of you also like the book.</v>

01:01:12.160 --> 01:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>There are significant difference, pervasive differences, between what the rabbis gave us,</v>

01:01:19.120 --> 01:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and the Book of Job.</v>

01:01:21.040 --> 01:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>We are not going to go over them exhaustively in this episode,</v>

01:01:24.240 --> 01:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>because that would take significantly longer than an entire episode.</v>

01:01:28.320 --> 01:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>It would have to be a series unto itself, and probably a</v>

01:01:31.360 --> 01:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>long one But sort of by way of introduction, I'm going to</v>

01:01:35.600 --> 01:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>read a quote for you from origin written to Africanus.</v>

01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Again, through the whole of Job, there are many passages in the</v>

01:01:44.720 --> 01:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew which are wanting in our copies, generally four or five verses,</v>

01:01:49.440 --> 01:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes, however, even fourteen and nineteen and sixteen.</v>

01:01:53.520 --> 01:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But why should I enumerate all the instances I collected with so</v>

01:01:56.960 --> 01:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>much labor?</v>

01:01:57.840 --> 01:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>To prove that the difference between our copies and those of the</v>

01:02:01.200 --> 01:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Jews did not escape me.</v>

01:02:02.880 --> 01:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>In Jeremiah I noticed many instances, and indeed in that book I</v>

01:02:07.120 --> 01:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>found much transposition and variation in the readings of the prophecies.</v>

01:02:11.600 --> 01:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Again in Genesis, the words God saw that it was good, when</v>

01:02:15.760 --> 01:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the firmament was made, are not found in the Hebrew, and there</v>

01:02:19.280 --> 01:02:22.080
<v Speaker 2>is no small dispute among them about this.</v>

01:02:22.080 --> 01:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And other instances are to be found in Genesis which I marked</v>

01:02:25.200 --> 01:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>for the sake of distinction, with the sign the Greeks call an</v>

01:02:28.320 --> 01:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>obelisk, as on the other hand I marked with an asterisk, those</v>

01:02:32.080 --> 01:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>passages in our copies which are not found in the Hebrew.</v>

01:02:35.200 --> 01:02:38.800
<v Speaker 2>What needs there to speak of Exodus, where there is such diversity</v>

01:02:38.800 --> 01:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in what is said about the tabernacle and its court, and the</v>

01:02:41.600 --> 01:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>ark, and the garments of the high priest and the priests, that</v>

01:02:44.880 --> 01:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>sometimes the meaning even does not seem to be akin.</v>

01:02:48.160 --> 01:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And forsooth, when we notice such things, we are immediately to reject</v>

01:02:52.240 --> 01:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>as spurious the copies in use in our churches, and enjoin the</v>

01:02:56.240 --> 01:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>brotherhood to put away the sacred books current among them, and to</v>

01:02:59.440 --> 01:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>coax the Jews, and persuade them to give us copies, which shall</v>

01:03:03.120 --> 01:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>be untampered with and free from forgery?</v>

01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Are we to suppose that that providence, which in the sacred scriptures</v>

01:03:10.160 --> 01:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>has ministered to the edification of all the churches of Christ, had</v>

01:03:13.840 --> 01:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>no thought for those bought with a price, for whom Christ died,</v>

01:03:17.840 --> 01:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>whom although his Son, God who is love spared not, but gave</v>

01:03:21.600 --> 01:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>him up for us all, that with him he might freely give</v>

01:03:24.720 --> 01:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>us all things.</v>

01:03:25.760 --> 01:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>In all these cases consider whether it would not be Would not</v>

01:03:28.480 --> 01:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>be well to remember the words you shall not remove the ancient</v>

01:03:31.840 --> 01:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>landmarks which your fathers have set.</v>

01:03:36.400 --> 01:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And you can go ahead and find that in your English copies</v>

01:03:39.840 --> 01:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of scripture that are based on the Masoretic text.</v>

01:03:42.080 --> 01:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>You can compare the things said in that quote in particular about</v>

01:03:45.280 --> 01:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the firmament and God saw that it was good, and you will</v>

01:03:48.800 --> 01:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>notice that they are absent, and if they're not absent they are</v>

01:03:51.920 --> 01:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>footnoted because they are included from indeed the Septuagint.</v>

01:03:57.680 --> 01:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>But to give some examples of the differences in Job, and again</v>

01:04:01.360 --> 01:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>we won't be going through exhaustive examples because there are so many</v>

01:04:04.320 --> 01:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of them, but starting with Job one, verse five, first from the</v>

01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Masoretic, then I'll read from the Septuagint.</v>

01:04:11.280 --> 01:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And when the days of the feast had run their course, Job</v>

01:04:14.080 --> 01:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>would send and consecrate them, and he would rise early in the</v>

01:04:17.040 --> 01:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>morning and offer burnt offerings, according to the number of them all.</v>

01:04:20.720 --> 01:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>For Job said, It may be that my children have sinned, and</v>

01:04:24.400 --> 01:04:26.160
<v Speaker 2>curse God in their hearts.</v>

01:04:26.160 --> 01:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Thus Job did continually.</v>

01:04:28.480 --> 01:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>And now from the Septuagint.</v>

01:04:30.480 --> 01:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And when the days of the banquet were finished, Job sent and</v>

01:04:33.760 --> 01:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>purified them, rising up each morning and offering for them a sacrifice</v>

01:04:37.680 --> 01:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>according to their number, one calf for a sin offering for their</v>

01:04:41.200 --> 01:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>lives. For Job said, In case my sons have thought evil things</v>

01:04:45.360 --> 01:04:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in their minds toward God.</v>

01:04:46.720 --> 01:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>So Job acted all the days.</v>

01:04:50.320 --> 01:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>It is a little different to think something evil or inappropriate toward</v>

01:04:54.560 --> 01:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>God in one's mind and to curse God in your heart.</v>

01:04:58.560 --> 01:05:03.840
<v Speaker 2>That is a significant change that the rabbis introduced into Job.</v>

01:05:03.840 --> 01:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And from the very next verse.</v>

01:05:05.920 --> 01:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Now there was a day when the sons of God came to</v>

01:05:08.400 --> 01:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.</v>

01:05:12.800 --> 01:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Now from the Septuagint, and it happened that one day and behold</v>

01:05:16.880 --> 01:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the angels of God came to stand before the Lord, and the</v>

01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>devil came among them.</v>

01:05:21.920 --> 01:05:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Now we could quibble over the difference between the devil and Satan.</v>

01:05:25.840 --> 01:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>That's neither here nor there, and in fact it is the same</v>

01:05:28.560 --> 01:05:31.920
<v Speaker 2>individual, of course, the same actor is present.</v>

01:05:31.920 --> 01:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>But there is a difference here between the sons of God and</v>

01:05:35.200 --> 01:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the angels of God.</v>

01:05:36.800 --> 01:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We could argue about what that difference means and how it aligns</v>

01:05:40.320 --> 01:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>with other verses in scripture and whether the same language is used,</v>

01:05:44.640 --> 01:05:46.720
<v Speaker 2>but the change is significant.</v>

01:05:46.720 --> 01:05:50.720
<v Speaker 2>They change the angels of God to the sons of God.</v>

01:05:50.720 --> 01:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>They are They are trying to teach something different.</v>

01:05:54.560 --> 01:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>As we said earlier about the genealogies, just because something may seem</v>

01:05:58.640 --> 01:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>innocuous on the surface doesn't necessarily mean that it is.</v>

01:06:02.880 --> 01:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>There is undoubtedly ulterior motives in play here.</v>

01:06:07.360 --> 01:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>They have something in mind they are trying to accomplish down the</v>

01:06:11.120 --> 01:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>line. And notably with the genealogies again, that is going to come</v>

01:06:14.800 --> 01:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>back in my conclusion for this episode, because it actually plays a</v>

01:06:18.320 --> 01:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>key part in things that are happening today.</v>

01:06:21.200 --> 01:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>These are not issues that we left in the past.</v>

01:06:24.320 --> 01:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>These are things that are ongoing.</v>

01:06:27.520 --> 01:06:30.160
<v Speaker 2>The next example from Job two.</v>

01:06:30.160 --> 01:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>And you will note that sort of not bearing the lead, but</v>

01:06:33.520 --> 01:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you will note the version in scripture in the Septuagint is actually</v>

01:06:37.360 --> 01:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>significantly longer.</v>

01:06:38.320 --> 01:06:41.200
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those cases where they simply deleted a bunch</v>

01:06:41.200 --> 01:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of verses because they felt like it.</v>

01:06:43.440 --> 01:06:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So first from the Masoretic text.</v>

01:06:46.160 --> 01:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Then his wife said to him, Do you still hold fast your</v>

01:06:49.680 --> 01:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>integrity? Curse God and die.</v>

01:06:52.400 --> 01:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>But he said to her, You speak as one of the foolish</v>

01:06:55.760 --> 01:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>women would speak, shall we receive good from God, and shall we</v>

01:06:59.600 --> 01:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>not receive evil?</v>

01:07:00.880 --> 01:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>In all this Job did not sin with his lips.</v>

01:07:04.480 --> 01:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>And now from the Septuagint.</v>

01:07:06.640 --> 01:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>And after much time had passed, his wife said to him, How</v>

01:07:10.960 --> 01:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>long will you wait, saying, Behold, I wait, for just a little</v>

01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>time to receive the hope of my deliverance?</v>

01:07:16.880 --> 01:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>For behold, your memory has been removed from the earth, sons and</v>

01:07:20.400 --> 01:07:24.560
<v Speaker 2>daughters of my belly, pangs and labours that I laboured with hardship</v>

01:07:24.560 --> 01:07:29.360
<v Speaker 2>pointlessly, and you, you seat yourself among the decay of worms, to</v>

01:07:29.360 --> 01:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>pass the night in the open air, and I am being led</v>

01:07:32.080 --> 01:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>astray and am a servant wandering from place to place, and from</v>

01:07:35.600 --> 01:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>house to house, welcoming the sun when it sets in order that</v>

01:07:38.960 --> 01:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I might stop my labours and pains, that now come to me.</v>

01:07:42.640 --> 01:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Now say some word to the Lord and die.</v>

01:07:45.680 --> 01:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But looking up he said to her, You speak like one of</v>

01:07:48.400 --> 01:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the foolish women, if we accept good things from the hand of</v>

01:07:51.840 --> 01:07:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the Lord, shall we not endure evil things?</v>

01:07:54.720 --> 01:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>In all these things that happened to him, in no way did</v>

01:07:57.840 --> 01:08:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Job sin by his speaking before God</v>

01:08:02.320 --> 01:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a fairly significant difference between saying say some word to</v>

01:08:07.600 --> 01:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the Lord and die, and curse God and die.</v>

01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Job's wife here is just lamenting what has happened to Job and</v>

01:08:16.240 --> 01:08:17.680
<v Speaker 2>what has happened to her.</v>

01:08:17.680 --> 01:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>She is not telling Job to curse God, and yet the rabbis</v>

01:08:22.080 --> 01:08:26.240
<v Speaker 2>have changed it, so that she instructs her husband to curse God</v>

01:08:26.240 --> 01:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and die.</v>

01:08:28.880 --> 01:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the other things to note in the text of Job,</v>

01:08:31.680 --> 01:08:36.320
<v Speaker 3>which is universal in the Septuagint, is that you'll find that Job</v>

01:08:36.320 --> 01:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>is one of the Bible books that uses the words Lord and</v>

01:08:40.880 --> 01:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>God more than probably almost any other.</v>

01:08:43.280 --> 01:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about or to God the entire time, where God is</v>

01:08:46.880 --> 01:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>speaking, God is acting.</v>

01:08:48.400 --> 01:08:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So Lord and God appear a whole bunch, which means in the</v>

01:08:52.960 --> 01:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>rabbinic text, you're going to have the tetragrammaton.</v>

01:08:56.240 --> 01:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have YHWH showing up over and over and over</v>

01:08:59.840 --> 01:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>again. We talked, I think, in the Judaizing heresy episode about the</v>

01:09:06.320 --> 01:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>blasphemy of so-called Yahweh.</v>

01:09:09.760 --> 01:09:14.240
<v Speaker 3>There is no Christian nexus to the use of the word Yahweh</v>

01:09:14.400 --> 01:09:18.480
<v Speaker 3>or even to the use of the Tatragrammasan itself.</v>

01:09:18.480 --> 01:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>This is fundamentally Babylonian black magic name magic.</v>

01:09:23.520 --> 01:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>This is a black magic practice that the Hebrews brought with them</v>

01:09:27.680 --> 01:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>from Babylonia.</v>

01:09:28.960 --> 01:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Practicing name magic is wicked and damnable.</v>

01:09:32.320 --> 01:09:36.240
<v Speaker 3>What they have done is taken Lord and God that are used</v>

01:09:36.240 --> 01:09:37.600
<v Speaker 3>throughout Scripture.</v>

01:09:37.600 --> 01:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>The same words are used in the Old Testament and New Testament</v>

01:09:40.800 --> 01:09:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Curios and Theos Lord and God, like Curi</v>

01:09:45.680 --> 01:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and theology.</v>

01:09:47.280 --> 01:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>These words are familiar to us from the liturgy and from just</v>

01:09:50.400 --> 01:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>being Christians.</v>

01:09:51.840 --> 01:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>They're based in the Greek.</v>

01:09:53.600 --> 01:09:59.600
<v Speaker 3>The Septuagint doesn't have any tetragrammatum, doesn't have any special magic words</v>

01:09:59.600 --> 01:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>or letters or anything.</v>

01:10:00.960 --> 01:10:02.720
<v Speaker 3>There's no special symbol.</v>

01:10:02.720 --> 01:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>It's literally God and Lord.</v>

01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>That's crucial.</v>

01:10:07.200 --> 01:10:11.760
<v Speaker 3>That's crucial today in a way that was never crucial before, because</v>

01:10:11.920 --> 01:10:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the Judaizing that has taken over the entire church is novel.</v>

01:10:16.800 --> 01:10:22.560
<v Speaker 3>The fact that we have theology published and pastors referencing Yahweh is</v>

01:10:22.560 --> 01:10:24.960
<v Speaker 3>though they're doing something sacred.</v>

01:10:24.960 --> 01:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>It's profane and it's blasphemous.</v>

01:10:27.920 --> 01:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>You will not find it in the Septuagint, you will not find</v>

01:10:30.800 --> 01:10:32.320
<v Speaker 3>it in the early church fathers.</v>

01:10:32.320 --> 01:10:35.040
<v Speaker 3>No one who used the Greek, it never would occur to him.</v>

01:10:35.040 --> 01:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>And to the extent that they commented on it, they disregarded it.</v>

01:10:38.880 --> 01:10:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Theos God curios Lord</v>

01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>It boggles the mind how much of the modern heresies, both politically</v>

01:10:49.280 --> 01:10:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and theologically that we are beset by, are originated with these sorts</v>

01:10:54.400 --> 01:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of small textual changes.</v>

01:10:56.640 --> 01:10:59.280
<v Speaker 3>It's the smallest reframe in the world.</v>

01:10:59.280 --> 01:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Because what does it do?</v>

01:11:00.880 --> 01:11:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly it makes the rabbinic text paramount.</v>

01:11:04.320 --> 01:11:08.640
<v Speaker 3>You can't have the authentic God if you don't have the rabbinic</v>

01:11:08.640 --> 01:11:12.080
<v Speaker 3>text. If you're not looking at Hebrew letters, you're not looking at</v>

01:11:12.080 --> 01:11:14.000
<v Speaker 3>anything that God breathed out.</v>

01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And what do we find when we look at God's name?</v>

01:11:16.560 --> 01:11:19.200
<v Speaker 3>We don't find Lord, we don't find God.</v>

01:11:19.200 --> 01:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>We find special magical symbols with a special magical secret word that</v>

01:11:24.400 --> 01:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>was so sacred that they wouldn't even write down the full thing</v>

01:11:28.240 --> 01:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>because it was too powerful.</v>

01:11:30.400 --> 01:11:32.160
<v Speaker 3>That's a magic incantation.</v>

01:11:32.160 --> 01:11:33.440
<v Speaker 3>That's demon summoning.</v>

01:11:33.440 --> 01:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>That has nothing to do with the Lord God.</v>

01:11:36.160 --> 01:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>There are archaeological examples going back nearly a thousand years before the</v>

01:11:41.760 --> 01:11:46.160
<v Speaker 3>birth of Christ, to a to a Yah and a Yahweh appearing</v>

01:11:46.160 --> 01:11:49.360
<v Speaker 3>in the Near East, and they're always demon gods.</v>

01:11:49.360 --> 01:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>There was a demon god by that name that was worshipped, and</v>

01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:56.480
<v Speaker 3>we do have archaeological evidence of it, and what we find is</v>

01:11:56.480 --> 01:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>as nothing whatsoever to do with the true Israelite religion.</v>

01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Those who actually practiced and preserved Christianity as God had instructed and</v>

01:12:07.760 --> 01:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>intended for them didn't engage in that.</v>

01:12:10.400 --> 01:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>You find it with their neighbors, and so there were others among</v>

01:12:13.280 --> 01:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the Hebrews who pulled that stuff in and adopted it.</v>

01:12:16.080 --> 01:12:19.440
<v Speaker 3>And the rabbis continued it for three thousand years.</v>

01:12:19.440 --> 01:12:22.960
<v Speaker 3>But when we see it and hear it today, we are not</v>

01:12:22.960 --> 01:12:24.560
<v Speaker 3>hearing anything Christian.</v>

01:12:24.560 --> 01:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>It dies with the Septuagint.</v>

01:12:27.360 --> 01:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>There are just a few other notes I want to make about</v>

01:12:30.160 --> 01:12:35.440
<v Speaker 3>changes to Job before we get into the chronological changes, because the</v>

01:12:35.440 --> 01:12:40.800
<v Speaker 3>timeline alterations through changes in facts in Job are really the most</v>

01:12:40.800 --> 01:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>important thing about what was done to it.</v>

01:12:42.960 --> 01:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>All in all the rabbinic text is about one sixth longer than</v>

01:12:46.800 --> 01:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>what is in the Septuagint.</v>

01:12:49.040 --> 01:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>It's mostly poetic repetitions.</v>

01:12:51.280 --> 01:12:55.120
<v Speaker 3>It includes a big chunk of Elihu's speech from chapters thirty two</v>

01:12:55.280 --> 01:12:56.720
<v Speaker 3>through thirty seven.</v>

01:12:56.720 --> 01:13:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Job's wife's speech is omitted entirely.</v>

01:13:00.160 --> 01:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>The next thing that happens after her diatribe is that Job's friends</v>

01:13:04.480 --> 01:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>show up.</v>

01:13:05.600 --> 01:13:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, Cory and I pointed out in the past, even before we</v>

01:13:08.480 --> 01:13:12.960
<v Speaker 3>understood the Septuagint, Corey had made the point that when you look</v>

01:13:12.960 --> 01:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>at Job and you look at the wealth that he lost and</v>

01:13:16.640 --> 01:13:19.840
<v Speaker 3>then what was regained, he had to be one of the richest</v>

01:13:19.840 --> 01:13:21.280
<v Speaker 3>men on the planet.</v>

01:13:21.280 --> 01:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>It was not just oh this guy's has a lot of money,</v>

01:13:24.320 --> 01:13:26.240
<v Speaker 3>this guy's a lot of wealth.</v>

01:13:26.240 --> 01:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>His riches were off the charts.</v>

01:13:29.920 --> 01:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>The only reasonable conclusion in this era was that the man with</v>

01:13:34.720 --> 01:13:36.880
<v Speaker 3>that much money has to be a king.</v>

01:13:36.880 --> 01:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Because in all of human history, the richest guy in the country</v>

01:13:40.240 --> 01:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>is the king.</v>

01:13:41.120 --> 01:13:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Whoever has the most money is in charge.</v>

01:13:43.440 --> 01:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>And you know what?</v>

01:13:44.160 --> 01:13:45.520
<v Speaker 3>That's still true today.</v>

01:13:45.520 --> 01:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>We paper it over with this fake democracy crap.</v>

01:13:49.200 --> 01:13:52.240
<v Speaker 3>The richest guy is the most powerful guy.</v>

01:13:52.240 --> 01:13:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, it only falls apart to the extent that a lot of</v>

01:13:55.680 --> 01:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>modern wealth is digital, it's notional in nature, such that these guys</v>

01:14:02.720 --> 01:14:06.480
<v Speaker 3>had wealth, they had camels, they had armies, they had land, they</v>

01:14:06.640 --> 01:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>had stuff, they had real goods.</v>

01:14:09.280 --> 01:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>That is somewhat different than having extra zeros in your bank account.</v>

01:14:13.440 --> 01:14:18.560
<v Speaker 3>If you get to eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve zeros zeros, you're</v>

01:14:18.560 --> 01:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>at a level that virtually none of us, probably nobody listening, can</v>

01:14:22.080 --> 01:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>understand. Nevertheless, until you deploy that capital, it really just impresses people.</v>

01:14:28.320 --> 01:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And people are very impressed by it.</v>

01:14:29.760 --> 01:14:30.720
<v Speaker 3>It opens doors.</v>

01:14:30.720 --> 01:14:33.200
<v Speaker 3>You have friends that others would not.</v>

01:14:33.200 --> 01:14:38.640
<v Speaker 3>But the power incumbent doesn't necessarily scale as it did at the</v>

01:14:38.640 --> 01:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>time. So for Job to have all this stuff, not merely gold,</v>

01:14:42.560 --> 01:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>not merely a spreadsheet with wealth.</v>

01:14:44.800 --> 01:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>He actually had the stuff, made him one of the richest men.</v>

01:14:48.800 --> 01:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>And what is clear in Job both the first and the last</v>

01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>chapters is that he was a king.</v>

01:14:54.880 --> 01:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>His friends, his three friends are described, when they showed up.</v>

01:14:59.040 --> 01:15:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll just I'll read what Brenton says here.</v>

01:15:01.440 --> 01:15:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Now his three friends, having heard all the evil that was come</v>

01:15:04.160 --> 01:15:06.960
<v Speaker 3>upon him, came to him each from his own country.</v>

01:15:07.840 --> 01:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the king of the Famens, Baldad, sovereign of the Saukians, so far</v>

01:15:12.080 --> 01:15:15.040
<v Speaker 3>king of the Menaeans, and they came to him with one accord</v>

01:15:15.120 --> 01:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>to comfort and to visit him.</v>

01:15:17.360 --> 01:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So Job makes very clear the text of Job makes clear that</v>

01:15:20.800 --> 01:15:23.280
<v Speaker 3>his three friends are also kings.</v>

01:15:23.280 --> 01:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Which makes sense, because rich people have rich, powerful friends, that's just</v>

01:15:27.200 --> 01:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>how it works.</v>

01:15:28.080 --> 01:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>You very rarely at any place in time in history see substantial</v>

01:15:32.080 --> 01:15:34.720
<v Speaker 3>crossing of boundaries of class lines.</v>

01:15:34.720 --> 01:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>That's normal, that's fine.</v>

01:15:36.240 --> 01:15:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Who better to commiserate with a king who's lost everything than another</v>

01:15:40.880 --> 01:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>king? I could try to commiserate with Job and uh try to</v>

01:15:45.040 --> 01:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>give him a good advice, but I wouldn't actually know what it's</v>

01:15:47.600 --> 01:15:51.440
<v Speaker 3>like to lose a king's ransom, to lose a king's kingdom, to</v>

01:15:51.440 --> 01:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>lose all of his goods, you know, children are children, and they're</v>

01:15:54.640 --> 01:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>the most precious thing.</v>

01:15:55.920 --> 01:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>But to lose a bunch of stuff, you have to have it</v>

01:15:58.640 --> 01:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>to know how much it would hurt to lose it.</v>

01:16:00.400 --> 01:16:05.200
<v Speaker 3>A poor person can't possibly identify in the same way.</v>

01:16:05.200 --> 01:16:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So it makes a lot more sense when you know that Job</v>

01:16:07.920 --> 01:16:10.960
<v Speaker 3>is a king to know that his three friends are kings too.</v>

01:16:10.960 --> 01:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>And that by itself is contextual, but it doesn't still really play</v>

01:16:15.360 --> 01:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>into the timeline of things.</v>

01:16:19.040 --> 01:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Before I give you Job's actual genealogy at the end of Job</v>

01:16:23.040 --> 01:16:26.880
<v Speaker 3>in chapter 42, this is a portion that's completely delivered from the</v>

01:16:26.880 --> 01:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>rabbinic text.</v>

01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And we'll talk about why.</v>

01:16:29.840 --> 01:16:32.640
<v Speaker 3>The very last line of the same Job that we've all read</v>

01:16:32.640 --> 01:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>together in the Rabbinic text said, And Job died an old man</v>

01:16:36.320 --> 01:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and full of days.</v>

01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Like, okay, great, yeah.</v>

01:16:39.520 --> 01:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Happy ending.</v>

01:16:41.280 --> 01:16:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But it's not a Christian ending.</v>

01:16:43.200 --> 01:16:46.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a good ending, but it's not the Christian ending.</v>

01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Here's the Christian ending.</v>

01:16:47.280 --> 01:16:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Here's what the Septuagint says.</v>

01:16:49.360 --> 01:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>And Job died, an old man and full of days, and it</v>

01:16:52.240 --> 01:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>is written that he will rise again with those whom the Lord</v>

01:16:55.360 --> 01:16:57.760
<v Speaker 3>raises up.</v>

01:16:57.760 --> 01:17:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Boy howdy, that is a radical difference, isn't it?</v>

01:17:01.520 --> 01:17:05.280
<v Speaker 3>It harkens back to the comments of Joe Bain earlier, where he</v>

01:17:05.280 --> 01:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>said that he knew that he would rise bodily, and he would</v>

01:17:08.480 --> 01:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>see the Lord with his own eyes, even though he died.</v>

01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So there the confession that Job makes of the resurrection of the</v>

01:17:15.760 --> 01:17:19.360
<v Speaker 3>dead is left intact in the Rabbinic text, but at the end,</v>

01:17:19.360 --> 01:17:24.720
<v Speaker 3>chapter forty two, where he describes his death, it recapitulates that.</v>

01:17:24.720 --> 01:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>It is written that he will rise again with those whom the</v>

01:17:27.280 --> 01:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Lord raises up.</v>

01:17:28.160 --> 01:17:29.440
<v Speaker 3>That's the gospel.</v>

01:17:29.440 --> 01:17:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Job ends with the gospel of Jesus Christ.</v>

01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>And then the portion which is deleted entirely from the rabbinic text,</v>

01:17:39.600 --> 01:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to read all of it.</v>

01:17:40.560 --> 01:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>It's only about a paragraph, but it repeats that his friends who</v>

01:17:45.040 --> 01:17:48.640
<v Speaker 3>came to him were Dalphaz of the children of Esau, King of</v>

01:17:48.640 --> 01:17:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the Thamanites, Baldad, sovereign of the Saukians, so far king of the</v>

01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Menaeans. And it also says Job's own genealogy, which is crucial.</v>

01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Because the problem that we have with Job, the book, and the</v>

01:18:01.360 --> 01:18:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Rabbinic text, is it's just some guy floating in space, we don't</v>

01:18:05.040 --> 01:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>know. We don't know when.</v>

01:18:06.560 --> 01:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>He's in the Near East, we can tell that.</v>

01:18:09.520 --> 01:18:15.120
<v Speaker 3>He's somewhere around that time, but we don't know any specifics.</v>

01:18:15.120 --> 01:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>The specifics provided in Job forty two in the Septuagint well actually</v>

01:18:19.920 --> 01:18:21.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll read the rest of it.</v>

01:18:21.200 --> 01:18:23.680
<v Speaker 3>This man is described in the Syriac book as living in the</v>

01:18:23.680 --> 01:18:28.320
<v Speaker 3>land of Aesus, on the borders of Eudimea and Arabia, and his</v>

01:18:28.320 --> 01:18:32.640
<v Speaker 3>name before was Jobab, and having taken an Arabian wife, he begot</v>

01:18:32.640 --> 01:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>a son whose name was Enon, and he himself was a son</v>

01:18:36.320 --> 01:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of his father Zar, one of the sons of Esau, and of</v>

01:18:40.160 --> 01:18:42.480
<v Speaker 3>his mother Borsora.</v>

01:18:42.480 --> 01:18:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So that he was the fifth from Abram.</v>

01:18:45.200 --> 01:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>And then it goes on to list the kings who reigned in</v>

01:18:47.840 --> 01:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Edom and it includes Job.</v>

01:18:51.280 --> 01:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Job Ab was a king of Edom.</v>

01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:56.080
<v Speaker 3>So it makes clear the reason that his friends were kings was</v>

01:18:56.080 --> 01:18:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that he was a king.</v>

01:18:58.880 --> 01:19:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Once you know that Job has a genealogy, and in fact, is</v>

01:19:02.880 --> 01:19:06.960
<v Speaker 3>a descendant of Esau, descendant of Abram.</v>

01:19:06.960 --> 01:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Now we can plug it into the timeline, which is why we're</v>

01:19:10.080 --> 01:19:13.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna finish up the timeline stuff talking about Job himself.</v>

01:19:13.120 --> 01:19:14.720
<v Speaker 3>This is a really big deal.</v>

01:19:14.720 --> 01:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I this honestly blew me away.</v>

01:19:18.160 --> 01:19:22.640
<v Speaker 3>The chronology that's provided in Job forty two is mirrored in Genesis</v>

01:19:22.640 --> 01:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>thirty-six, which we all have.</v>

01:19:26.080 --> 01:19:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Genesis thirty six says Jobab son of Zara, Zare, son of Ragul,</v>

01:19:31.520 --> 01:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and Esau.</v>

01:19:33.040 --> 01:19:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And in speaking of the kings it says and Balak died and</v>

01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Jobab son of Zara from Borsoba reigned in his stead.</v>

01:19:39.600 --> 01:19:43.920
<v Speaker 3>So Genesis 36 confirms that there was a king Jobab, a king</v>

01:19:43.920 --> 01:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>of Edom, tells when he reigned, tells who his parents were, and</v>

01:19:48.080 --> 01:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>it matches up with Job 42.</v>

01:19:51.200 --> 01:19:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, it doesn't match up identically.</v>

01:19:53.840 --> 01:19:57.440
<v Speaker 3>This is one of those cases where when you're looking at genealogy,</v>

01:19:57.440 --> 01:19:59.200
<v Speaker 3>there are always issues.</v>

01:19:59.200 --> 01:20:03.040
<v Speaker 3>There are always seeming inconsistencies in all of these genealogies.</v>

01:20:03.040 --> 01:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to highlight the specific inconsistency in the Septuagint, because it's</v>

01:20:07.760 --> 01:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>important to acknowledge it, and it's important as the admonishment that I</v>

01:20:11.600 --> 01:20:16.480
<v Speaker 3>gave earlier about not being a rat-it-tier atheist, do not come up</v>

01:20:16.480 --> 01:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>with some rule that you're going to disqualify the Septuagint because of</v>

01:20:20.240 --> 01:20:23.920
<v Speaker 3>this sort of inconsistency, do not come up with a rule that</v>

01:20:23.920 --> 01:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>would also nullify the genealogies in Matthew and Luke of Jesus Christ,</v>

01:20:29.040 --> 01:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>because they also require reconciliation.</v>

01:20:32.560 --> 01:20:36.160
<v Speaker 3>They don't line up perfectly, and we've explained why that is as</v>

01:20:36.160 --> 01:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a church.</v>

01:20:36.800 --> 01:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Not stonequare, we don't need to do this work, there's nothing novel</v>

01:20:39.680 --> 01:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>there. The church has always contended with the fact that God tells</v>

01:20:43.040 --> 01:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the same story repeatedly in slightly different ways.</v>

01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>God loves to do that for some reason.</v>

01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't know why.</v>

01:20:48.960 --> 01:20:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we kind of do too, but when he does it in</v>

01:20:51.360 --> 01:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>scripture and gives us parallax, we don't get to just throw out</v>

01:20:54.880 --> 01:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the one that we don't like, even if we can't exactly reconcile</v>

01:20:58.080 --> 01:21:01.920
<v Speaker 3>them. And this is very much a case where unlike the pyramids</v>

01:21:02.160 --> 01:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>in the timeline of the flood, we have to simply say, Lord,</v>

01:21:06.480 --> 01:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I believe help my unbelief.</v>

01:21:08.080 --> 01:21:11.120
<v Speaker 3>If we can't reconcile them, we say it's all true and I</v>

01:21:11.120 --> 01:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know why.</v>

01:21:12.080 --> 01:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>That I think that's the most Christian response we can have.</v>

01:21:14.960 --> 01:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>There are times where that is going to apply.</v>

01:21:18.320 --> 01:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>And it applies to things in the New Testament.</v>

01:21:20.560 --> 01:21:24.640
<v Speaker 3>The Septuagint does not create any problem here that the church has</v>

01:21:24.640 --> 01:21:26.880
<v Speaker 3>not contended with for a long time.</v>

01:21:26.880 --> 01:21:31.440
<v Speaker 3>So when Job 42 says that Job himself was the fifth from</v>

01:21:31.440 --> 01:21:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Abram, that is not consistent with Genesis 36, which in effect says</v>

01:21:37.120 --> 01:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>that he was the great grandson of Esau rather than his grandson.</v>

01:21:40.480 --> 01:21:44.000
<v Speaker 3>So what we have here is what is commonly referred to as</v>

01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a telescoping generation, where one man in the case of Jobab's chronology</v>

01:21:49.040 --> 01:21:54.080
<v Speaker 3>in Genesis thirty six, Ragul is omitted in Job forty-two.</v>

01:21:54.080 --> 01:21:58.640
<v Speaker 3>There are cases where God omits men from genealogies.</v>

01:21:58.640 --> 01:22:00.480
<v Speaker 3>It's something we've always had to deal with.</v>

01:22:00.480 --> 01:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>We just have to take it.</v>

01:22:01.840 --> 01:22:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, having looked at this for quite some time, trying to reconcile</v>

01:22:05.520 --> 01:22:11.120
<v Speaker 3>it myself, my personal conclusion, and I think the safe Christian conclusion,</v>

01:22:11.120 --> 01:22:16.160
<v Speaker 3>is that we should view the inconsistency in Job forty two where</v>

01:22:16.160 --> 01:22:21.120
<v Speaker 3>it says fifth from Abram, where Ragul is omitted, as for some</v>

01:22:21.120 --> 01:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>reason Ragul was simply omitted by God.</v>

01:22:24.080 --> 01:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>We don't know why.</v>

01:22:25.280 --> 01:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>We know that he was not king.</v>

01:22:27.280 --> 01:22:30.960
<v Speaker 3>His sons were made powerful, but he himself was not.</v>

01:22:30.960 --> 01:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>That's something that's told in Genesis thirty-six.</v>

01:22:33.840 --> 01:22:35.680
<v Speaker 3>But we don't know what happened to him, but we do know</v>

01:22:35.680 --> 01:22:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that he was a real man.</v>

01:22:37.040 --> 01:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think that it's the far greater error to go into</v>

01:22:40.480 --> 01:22:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Genesis thirty-six and delete Ragul than to infer his existence in forty</v>

01:22:47.040 --> 01:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>two, in Job forty two.</v>

01:22:49.280 --> 01:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that's a small detail here, but if you want to</v>

01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>look at these texts yourself and you want to be really meticulous</v>

01:22:54.880 --> 01:22:59.520
<v Speaker 3>you will find that in Genesis it will say Zara and then</v>

01:22:59.520 --> 01:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>it will say Zar, Z-A-R-A versus Z-A-R-E.</v>

01:23:03.840 --> 01:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>And the name for the wife for the land in Genesis 36</v>

01:23:08.400 --> 01:23:14.640
<v Speaker 3>is Borsoba, whereas in Genesis 42 it's Borsoba, so a H A</v>

01:23:14.640 --> 01:23:16.160
<v Speaker 3>versus a B A.</v>

01:23:16.160 --> 01:23:18.640
<v Speaker 3>By itself, if just one of the names were different, you could</v>

01:23:18.640 --> 01:23:22.160
<v Speaker 3>say, well maybe that's slightly it's an inconsistency, I'm not sure if</v>

01:23:22.160 --> 01:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the same person.</v>

01:23:22.960 --> 01:23:26.160
<v Speaker 3>When both the father and the mother are off by only one</v>

01:23:26.160 --> 01:23:29.120
<v Speaker 3>character, it's absolutely the same person.</v>

01:23:29.120 --> 01:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And this is not just a Bible problem.</v>

01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>About ten years ago, I took a road trip around the country</v>

01:23:35.840 --> 01:23:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and I had the privilege to visit family graveyard on my mom's</v>

01:23:40.400 --> 01:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>side in western North Carolina in Ash County.</v>

01:23:44.080 --> 01:23:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Mentifour is one of the places flooded out it out.</v>

01:23:47.200 --> 01:23:51.280
<v Speaker 3>The family plot is up on Top of the Hillside, and I</v>

01:23:51.280 --> 01:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>found it online on Find Grave and made sure that was one</v>

01:23:54.320 --> 01:23:57.520
<v Speaker 3>of the waypoints that I visited because my grandfather who's buried there</v>

01:23:57.600 --> 01:23:59.600
<v Speaker 3>actually helped build the Blue Ridge Parkway.</v>

01:23:59.600 --> 01:24:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my grandfather helped build it.</v>

01:24:01.120 --> 01:24:04.080
<v Speaker 3>If you look that up, he was born in eighteen ninety seven.</v>

01:24:04.080 --> 01:24:06.480
<v Speaker 3>My grandpa was eighty two when I was born.</v>

01:24:06.480 --> 01:24:07.360
<v Speaker 3>He was really old.</v>

01:24:07.360 --> 01:24:10.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like there's you know, talking about generational compression and sliding.</v>

01:24:10.640 --> 01:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That still happens today too.</v>

01:24:12.480 --> 01:24:15.760
<v Speaker 3>My grandma's about twenty years younger than him, and my mom was</v>

01:24:15.760 --> 01:24:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the third youngest of nine brothers and sisters, so</v>

01:24:18.720 --> 01:24:18.880
you

01:24:18.880 --> 01:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>know,</v>

01:24:19.600 --> 01:24:23.760
<v Speaker 3>things can start to stretch even in modern days.</v>

01:24:23.760 --> 01:24:28.480
<v Speaker 3>The reason I mention the family plot is that in that graveyard</v>

01:24:28.560 --> 01:24:34.240
<v Speaker 3>with graves going back about 150 years, the surname of my mom</v>

01:24:34.880 --> 01:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>is spelled three different ways.</v>

01:24:37.280 --> 01:24:41.040
<v Speaker 3>So within living memory, the same people were spelling the same surname</v>

01:24:41.040 --> 01:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>in different ways.</v>

01:24:42.400 --> 01:24:45.760
<v Speaker 3>So if you've never done genealogy before, you probably haven't run into</v>

01:24:45.760 --> 01:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that. But when you look at the Old Testament, when you look</v>

01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:54.400
<v Speaker 3>at scripture and you find these minor inconsistencies in spelling, it's important</v>

01:24:54.400 --> 01:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>to verify is it the same person or is it somebody with</v>

01:24:56.720 --> 01:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>a similar name or you know a different person with you know</v>

01:24:59.360 --> 01:25:02.320
<v Speaker 3>an approximate name, or is it the same person with the same</v>

01:25:02.320 --> 01:25:04.480
<v Speaker 3>name just being recorded in a different way?</v>

01:25:04.480 --> 01:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Because if it could happen to people who were my ancestors 75</v>

01:25:08.160 --> 01:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>years ago, it can absolutely happen 4,000 years ago.</v>

01:25:11.760 --> 01:25:13.360
<v Speaker 3>It's nothing new.</v>

01:25:13.360 --> 01:25:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Prior to basically universal literacy, and even with universal literacy, people have</v>

01:25:18.400 --> 01:25:22.480
<v Speaker 3>not always been completely consistent about even spelling their own names.</v>

01:25:22.480 --> 01:25:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And you know, sometimes they'll diverge and then sort of get locked</v>

01:25:25.120 --> 01:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>in. So in that family plot, a couple generations back, people were</v>

01:25:30.160 --> 01:25:31.680
<v Speaker 3>spelling them inconsistently.</v>

01:25:31.920 --> 01:25:35.040
<v Speaker 3>At some point, one of those inconsistencies got locked in in a</v>

01:25:35.040 --> 01:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>couple different ways.</v>

01:25:36.480 --> 01:25:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Genealogy looks kind of weird sometimes.</v>

01:25:38.880 --> 01:25:41.920
<v Speaker 3>If you are gonna be autistic and you're gonna be meticulous about</v>

01:25:41.920 --> 01:25:44.240
<v Speaker 3>precision, it's really frustrating.</v>

01:25:44.240 --> 01:25:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Because you can't necessarily get exact perfect matchups of everything.</v>

01:25:49.760 --> 01:25:53.440
<v Speaker 3>But way you can rest assured is that regardless of whether or</v>

01:25:53.440 --> 01:25:56.080
<v Speaker 3>not you know your great grandparent's name, you know that you had</v>

01:25:56.080 --> 01:25:57.440
<v Speaker 3>to have a great grandparent.</v>

01:25:57.440 --> 01:26:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Even if you know you were adopted or was lost for whatever</v>

01:26:00.240 --> 01:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>reason, that person had to exist or you wouldn't be here.</v>

01:26:03.280 --> 01:26:06.880
<v Speaker 3>That is an absolute biological mathematical certainty.</v>

01:26:06.880 --> 01:26:10.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's absolutely a certainty that Job had parents and grandparents and</v>

01:26:10.880 --> 01:26:11.440
<v Speaker 3>so forth.</v>

01:26:11.440 --> 01:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>And when we look at Job forty two and reconcile with Genesis</v>

01:26:14.480 --> 01:26:18.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty six, the only thing we have to contend with is this</v>

01:26:18.400 --> 01:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>telescoping generation where Ragul is eliminated, and Job is in effect called</v>

01:26:24.320 --> 01:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>a grandson of Esau rather than a great grandson, which even today</v>

01:26:28.320 --> 01:26:29.680
<v Speaker 3>is not strange.</v>

01:26:29.680 --> 01:26:34.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're a northwestern European man, you would call Charlemagne</v>

01:26:34.560 --> 01:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>your grandfather, or you could, because virtue all of us are going</v>

01:26:37.520 --> 01:26:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to be have been descended from him.</v>

01:26:39.920 --> 01:26:44.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not abnormal to skip the forty generations between here and there</v>

01:26:44.080 --> 01:26:47.360
<v Speaker 3>to say Charlemagne's my grandfather.</v>

01:26:47.360 --> 01:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Scripture itself does this as well.</v>

01:26:49.760 --> 01:26:52.080
<v Speaker 3>God said to Jacob, I am the Lord the God of your</v>

01:26:52.080 --> 01:26:55.760
<v Speaker 3>father Abraham and the God of Isaac, even though that was skipping</v>

01:26:55.760 --> 01:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>a generation.</v>

01:26:56.960 --> 01:27:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Jacob also asked, Do you know Laban the son of Nahor?</v>

01:27:00.160 --> 01:27:03.360
<v Speaker 3>However, Genesis makes clear that Laban is the son of Bethel, the</v>

01:27:03.360 --> 01:27:05.040
<v Speaker 3>grandson of Nahor.</v>

01:27:05.040 --> 01:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So regardless whether you're using a Septuagint or the rabbinic text, there</v>

01:27:08.800 --> 01:27:11.600
<v Speaker 3>are cases where men are called sons or actually grandsons and so</v>

01:27:11.600 --> 01:27:15.680
<v Speaker 3>forth. That sort of lineal descent, we're all sons of Adam.</v>

01:27:15.680 --> 01:27:17.600
<v Speaker 3>It's normal to talk that way.</v>

01:27:17.600 --> 01:27:23.680
<v Speaker 3>When you're getting into the specificity of exactly which generation it is,</v>

01:27:23.680 --> 01:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>there's sometimes ambiguities.</v>

01:27:25.440 --> 01:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>That's particularly the case in these cultures in this day.</v>

01:27:28.480 --> 01:27:31.360
<v Speaker 3>So I pointed out because if you dig into it, all this</v>

01:27:31.360 --> 01:27:32.480
<v Speaker 3>is this doesn't match.</v>

01:27:32.480 --> 01:27:33.680
<v Speaker 3>This can't be the same.</v>

01:27:33.680 --> 01:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, what are you going to do?</v>

01:27:35.040 --> 01:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to throw it all out?</v>

01:27:36.960 --> 01:27:39.920
<v Speaker 3>If that's your conclusion, just know you're going to be throwing out</v>

01:27:39.920 --> 01:27:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Matthew and Luke and a whole bunch of other stuff.</v>

01:27:42.640 --> 01:27:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Because these problems are nothing new.</v>

01:27:44.480 --> 01:27:48.320
<v Speaker 3>And they're nothing that should concern anyone with strong and mature faith.</v>

01:27:48.320 --> 01:27:50.720
<v Speaker 3>And if you're new to the faith, don't worry about it at</v>

01:27:50.720 --> 01:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>all. Don't get tied up in genealogies and worny worrying about this</v>

01:27:54.080 --> 01:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>stuff. It's not the crucial part of the faith.</v>

01:27:57.440 --> 01:28:00.160
<v Speaker 3>But what is crucial is not lying about God.</v>

01:28:00.160 --> 01:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>If it turns out that there's been a mistake, an error, an</v>

01:28:02.320 --> 01:28:04.320
<v Speaker 3>omission, we try to do better.</v>

01:28:04.320 --> 01:28:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And in the case of the Septuagint, what we find is that</v>

01:28:07.840 --> 01:28:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the removal of this detail that Job was actually the king of</v>

01:28:12.400 --> 01:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Edom, and that he was descended from Esau by a couple generations,</v>

01:28:17.760 --> 01:28:22.480
<v Speaker 3>is profoundly important because what has just happened by that one fact</v>

01:28:22.800 --> 01:28:28.560
<v Speaker 3>in Job 42 is that Job the man is ripped out of</v>

01:28:28.560 --> 01:28:32.640
<v Speaker 3>mythology and placed directly in a timeline that's in the Bible.</v>

01:28:33.680 --> 01:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>This appears in two parallel paces in the first five books of</v>

01:28:38.240 --> 01:28:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the Bible.</v>

01:28:39.040 --> 01:28:42.240
<v Speaker 3>In Numbers 20 and in Deuteronomy 2, where the same story is</v>

01:28:42.240 --> 01:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>basically retold.</v>

01:28:43.680 --> 01:28:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, God likes to repeat Himself and tell the story</v>

01:28:46.240 --> 01:28:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in slightly different ways.</v>

01:28:47.760 --> 01:28:51.040
<v Speaker 3>And it's really important to look at both of them together because</v>

01:28:51.040 --> 01:28:55.200
<v Speaker 3>when you plug in the fact that Job was somewhere in the</v>

01:28:55.200 --> 01:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>neighborhood, somewhere around this time, and he was the king of Edom,</v>

01:28:59.920 --> 01:29:03.280
<v Speaker 3>it radically reframes the end of the Exodus.</v>

01:29:03.280 --> 01:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna briefly summarize the key events in Numbers twenty here.</v>

01:29:09.280 --> 01:29:12.480
<v Speaker 3>The Israelites revile Moses and God.</v>

01:29:12.720 --> 01:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>God tells Moses and Aaron to speak to the rock and to</v>

01:29:15.360 --> 01:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>provide water.</v>

01:29:16.800 --> 01:29:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Moses strikes the rock instead of speaking to it.</v>

01:29:20.080 --> 01:29:25.760
<v Speaker 3>God immediately pronounces death upon both Aaron and Moses for their disobedience.</v>

01:29:25.760 --> 01:29:28.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's one paragraph in numbers twenty.</v>

01:29:28.720 --> 01:29:31.200
<v Speaker 3>The next paragraph is numbers twenty is this.</v>

01:29:31.200 --> 01:29:35.120
<v Speaker 3>The king of Edom, who is unnamed, says he'll kill the Israelites</v>

01:29:35.120 --> 01:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>if they set one foot in his land.</v>

01:29:37.120 --> 01:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>He says he's going to send his army out, you're not crossing</v>

01:29:39.360 --> 01:29:41.120
<v Speaker 3>our border at all.</v>

01:29:41.120 --> 01:29:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And there's no moral commentary whatsoever in the text against the king</v>

01:29:45.760 --> 01:29:47.520
<v Speaker 3>of Edom for doing so.</v>

01:29:47.520 --> 01:29:51.680
<v Speaker 3>And then the next paragraph, concluding numbers twenty, God told Aaron to</v>

01:29:51.680 --> 01:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>give his son his priestly garments and go up on a mountain,</v>

01:29:54.880 --> 01:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and God killed him on the spot.</v>

01:29:56.400 --> 01:29:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Aaron didn't die of natural causes.</v>

01:29:58.400 --> 01:30:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Aaron didn't die of old age.</v>

01:30:00.480 --> 01:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Aaron died because God said now it's your time to die.</v>

01:30:04.320 --> 01:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>And while that is true for all of us, it is seldom</v>

01:30:08.160 --> 01:30:10.880
<v Speaker 3>true in such an immediate fashion.</v>

01:30:10.880 --> 01:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>And it's I think it's notable just looking at Numbers twenty as</v>

01:30:13.920 --> 01:30:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a story in general that you know Yeah.</v>

01:30:15.760 --> 01:30:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Aaron wasn't the one who struck the rock.</v>

01:30:17.760 --> 01:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Moses struck the rock.</v>

01:30:19.280 --> 01:30:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But they were brothers, they were there together as leaders.</v>

01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Aaron did nothing.</v>

01:30:25.440 --> 01:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it makes perfect sense when you read the story how</v>

01:30:29.200 --> 01:30:33.760
<v Speaker 3>much the Israelites had been haranguing Moses, it makes perfect sense that</v>

01:30:33.760 --> 01:30:34.960
<v Speaker 3>he got angry.</v>

01:30:34.960 --> 01:30:38.240
<v Speaker 3>And God said there's gonna be water coming out of this rock.</v>

01:30:38.240 --> 01:30:40.960
<v Speaker 3>He probably took his staff and struck it with both hands as</v>

01:30:40.960 --> 01:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>hard as he could.</v>

01:30:41.840 --> 01:30:43.040
<v Speaker 3>He was pissed.</v>

01:30:43.040 --> 01:30:46.880
<v Speaker 3>He was angry, and that was sin.</v>

01:30:46.880 --> 01:30:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Undoubtedly Aaron shared his frustration which boiled over into anger at the</v>

01:30:51.200 --> 01:30:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Israelites and their grumbling, the fact they were reviling him, and reviling</v>

01:30:55.680 --> 01:31:00.400
<v Speaker 3>God by extension, because God had placed them there as their leaders.</v>

01:31:00.400 --> 01:31:03.680
<v Speaker 3>That one act of disobedience, in a case of Aaron, God struck</v>

01:31:03.680 --> 01:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>him dead almost immediately.</v>

01:31:05.040 --> 01:31:07.280
<v Speaker 3>He's dead by the end of the chapter.</v>

01:31:07.280 --> 01:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>So this came up earlier today, it's unrelated, but there's a blow</v>

01:31:11.360 --> 01:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>up on X recently, once again, about the sinful past of girls</v>

01:31:17.440 --> 01:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and what obligations men have to take a girl as a wife</v>

01:31:22.160 --> 01:31:24.640
<v Speaker 3>who may have been acting up in horrible ways.</v>

01:31:24.640 --> 01:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Some I think it's protestia published an article saying that if an</v>

01:31:28.320 --> 01:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>OnlyFans model, in quotes, if an OnlyFans prostitute becomes a Christian and</v>

01:31:34.560 --> 01:31:38.240
<v Speaker 3>stops doing that, you have a Christian obligation to marry her.</v>

01:31:38.240 --> 01:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>And all those claims are always predicated on the notion that once</v>

01:31:43.440 --> 01:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>someone is forgiven by God, all the consequences are wiped away in</v>

01:31:47.680 --> 01:31:48.480
<v Speaker 3>this life.</v>

01:31:48.480 --> 01:31:52.480
<v Speaker 3>You can never have any consequences applied to you once Jesus forgives</v>

01:31:52.480 --> 01:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>you. If that were true, either Aaron is burning in hell, or</v>

01:31:58.480 --> 01:32:00.160
<v Speaker 3>has God sinned, because</v>

01:32:01.360 --> 01:32:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Aaron was a godly man.</v>

01:32:03.120 --> 01:32:07.120
<v Speaker 3>It was this one sin that condemned him to physical death.</v>

01:32:07.120 --> 01:32:09.520
<v Speaker 3>It did not condemn him to eternal death.</v>

01:32:09.520 --> 01:32:13.920
<v Speaker 3>He was properly mourned immediately by the Israelites For the appropriate period</v>

01:32:13.920 --> 01:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>of time, because he was a great patriarch.</v>

01:32:17.840 --> 01:32:20.560
<v Speaker 3>All of his sons became the priesthood.</v>

01:32:20.560 --> 01:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>He was a great man.</v>

01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:25.600
<v Speaker 3>He died in the Lord, and yet it was immediately the Lord</v>

01:32:25.600 --> 01:32:28.480
<v Speaker 3>who struck him dead for his sin.</v>

01:32:28.480 --> 01:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>The consequences of Moses and Aaron sinning, and you know, again, Aaron's</v>

01:32:34.720 --> 01:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>sin was lesser, certainly lesser than Moses's, and yet Aaron died first.</v>

01:32:39.040 --> 01:32:40.720
<v Speaker 3>God killed him almost immediately.</v>

01:32:40.720 --> 01:32:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Said, Go up on the hill, take off your clothes, give them</v>

01:32:42.400 --> 01:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to your son, and you die.</v>

01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly what happened.</v>

01:32:45.760 --> 01:32:48.240
<v Speaker 3>That was temporal consequences for sin.</v>

01:32:48.240 --> 01:32:49.840
<v Speaker 3>This is our God.</v>

01:32:49.840 --> 01:32:53.280
<v Speaker 3>And one of the overarching problems that we have, one of the</v>

01:32:53.280 --> 01:32:55.520
<v Speaker 3>reasons the stone choir exists, one of the reasons we're doing the</v>

01:32:55.520 --> 01:33:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Septuagint series at all, is that because post-Reformation certainly this reframing</v>

01:33:02.880 --> 01:33:07.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Jews as being central to everything, as being the key</v>

01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>that unlocks all of human history, certainly.</v>

01:33:10.640 --> 01:33:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Adam was a Jew, right?</v>

01:33:12.080 --> 01:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Had to be.</v>

01:33:12.720 --> 01:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Noah was a Jew, right?</v>

01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Because that was just, you know, they have the lineage and they</v>

01:33:16.800 --> 01:33:19.440
<v Speaker 3>can they can name them, so obviously they're all Jews.</v>

01:33:19.440 --> 01:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>We've demonstrated the absurdity of that in the Hebrews Israelite and Jews</v>

01:33:22.800 --> 01:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>episode. But these notions have become pervasive, particularly in American Protestantism today,</v>

01:33:29.280 --> 01:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>and they have suffused every aspect of how we view everything, such</v>

01:33:34.400 --> 01:33:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that when you see things like God striking Aaron dead for his</v>

01:33:38.160 --> 01:33:42.640
<v Speaker 3>sin, for Moses' sin and his participation in it, as a lesser</v>

01:33:42.640 --> 01:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>participant, we don't see anything at all.</v>

01:33:46.160 --> 01:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Because what's numbers 20 to us?</v>

01:33:48.400 --> 01:33:52.240
<v Speaker 3>If we have a Jew focused view of the Old Testament, well,</v>

01:33:52.240 --> 01:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's just it's a story about what the Hebrews are</v>

01:33:54.960 --> 01:33:57.280
<v Speaker 3>doing out in the desert and it's got nothing to do with</v>

01:33:57.280 --> 01:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>us. There's no moral conclusion to be drawn is there?</v>

01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Whereas if you look at Aaron being a Christian, being a believer</v>

01:34:03.840 --> 01:34:07.600
<v Speaker 3>who died in the Lord, and God killing him for his sin,</v>

01:34:07.600 --> 01:34:12.000
<v Speaker 3>it can be unambiguous that there are temporal consequences for sin even</v>

01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>when that sin is forgiven in eternity.</v>

01:34:14.960 --> 01:34:18.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not the subject of today's episode, but it's an ongoing battle</v>

01:34:18.880 --> 01:34:23.760
<v Speaker 3>in the church in what is lost by despising what's actually in</v>

01:34:23.760 --> 01:34:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the old testament, is the fact that God is not the God</v>

01:34:28.400 --> 01:34:30.480
<v Speaker 3>that we're often told he is.</v>

01:34:30.480 --> 01:34:32.960
<v Speaker 3>God killed Aaron on the spot for what he did.</v>

01:34:32.960 --> 01:34:35.600
<v Speaker 3>So that's an aside, but it's a crucial one because this is</v>

01:34:35.600 --> 01:34:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a live issue.</v>

01:34:36.800 --> 01:34:40.800
<v Speaker 3>The whole reason we're spending all this time talking about some translation</v>

01:34:41.120 --> 01:34:44.320
<v Speaker 3>is not because it's a fiddly detail of history.</v>

01:34:44.320 --> 01:34:46.320
<v Speaker 3>This is not textual criticism.</v>

01:34:46.320 --> 01:34:48.720
<v Speaker 3>This is about whether or not we believe God in everything that</v>

01:34:48.720 --> 01:34:51.200
<v Speaker 3>He says and take it seriously and act like it.</v>

01:34:51.200 --> 01:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>And right now we're not doing a very good job of that</v>

01:34:53.520 --> 01:34:54.800
<v Speaker 3>at all.</v>

01:34:54.800 --> 01:34:57.360
<v Speaker 3>In the middle paragraph where it says that the king of Edom</v>

01:34:57.600 --> 01:35:02.320
<v Speaker 3>refused entry, when you read Edom, you think, oh man, those Edomites,</v>

01:35:02.320 --> 01:35:03.120
<v Speaker 3>they were terrible.</v>

01:35:03.120 --> 01:35:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Later on, they absolutely were.</v>

01:35:04.880 --> 01:35:09.920
<v Speaker 3>They were malicious, they were despicable, they were truly wicked people.</v>

01:35:09.920 --> 01:35:13.840
<v Speaker 3>They were not those wicked Edomites in this day.</v>

01:35:14.160 --> 01:35:17.280
<v Speaker 3>They were, in fact, God fearers.</v>

01:35:17.280 --> 01:35:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, here's where the timeline comes in.</v>

01:35:20.800 --> 01:35:23.680
<v Speaker 3>And these are some numbers that I produced myself.</v>

01:35:23.680 --> 01:35:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to publish them certainly at this time, because I'm</v>

01:35:27.200 --> 01:35:30.720
<v Speaker 3>not the guy I'm not I'm not fiddly or patient enough to</v>

01:35:30.720 --> 01:35:33.360
<v Speaker 3>try to line up every single thing to make sure that it</v>

01:35:33.360 --> 01:35:35.280
<v Speaker 3>precisely works.</v>

01:35:35.280 --> 01:35:38.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna give you a timeline here that's going to be</v>

01:35:38.560 --> 01:35:42.560
<v Speaker 3>anchored with Abraham's birth basically at year one, just like we have</v>

01:35:42.560 --> 01:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>AD year of our Lord one with Jesus' birth ostensibly, AD, you</v>

01:35:47.600 --> 01:35:51.840
<v Speaker 3>know, birth of Abraham year one here for this timeline.</v>

01:35:51.840 --> 01:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>These numbers are absolutely internally consistent.</v>

01:35:55.360 --> 01:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Abraham is born 75 years later, he's given the promise, and he</v>

01:35:59.600 --> 01:36:01.280
<v Speaker 3>enters into Canaan.</v>

01:36:01.280 --> 01:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>At 100, Isaac is born.</v>

01:36:03.920 --> 01:36:09.840
<v Speaker 3>At 160 years at years after Abraham's birth, Esau and Jacob are</v>

01:36:09.840 --> 01:36:12.800
<v Speaker 3>born. And we often say Jacob and Esau, but Esau was the</v>

01:36:12.800 --> 01:36:16.400
<v Speaker 3>firstborn. So again, don't freak out when the second born has a</v>

01:36:16.400 --> 01:36:17.440
<v Speaker 3>greater blessing.</v>

01:36:17.440 --> 01:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>That's something God likes to do.</v>

01:36:19.520 --> 01:36:21.280
<v Speaker 3>But it's always in punishment.</v>

01:36:21.280 --> 01:36:24.160
<v Speaker 3>It's always because something has happened.</v>

01:36:24.160 --> 01:36:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And then fifteen years after the birth of Esau and Jacob, Abraham</v>

01:36:27.360 --> 01:36:29.680
<v Speaker 3>dies at age one hundred and seventy five.</v>

01:36:29.680 --> 01:36:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Seventy six years after Abraham dies, Joseph is born.</v>

01:36:33.120 --> 01:36:36.400
<v Speaker 3>So we're now a year two hundred fifty one on our timeline.</v>

01:36:36.400 --> 01:36:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Joseph is born at two hundred fifty one, Joseph is appointed overseer</v>

01:36:40.320 --> 01:36:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in Egypt about two hundred eighty one, and that's the beginning of</v>

01:36:43.360 --> 01:36:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the years of plenty.</v>

01:36:45.280 --> 01:36:48.320
<v Speaker 3>And then the famine begins in about two hundred and eighty-eight years</v>

01:36:48.320 --> 01:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>after Abraham's birth.</v>

01:36:50.560 --> 01:36:52.720
<v Speaker 3>We get to about three hundred years.</v>

01:36:52.720 --> 01:36:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna round a little bit here because it's it's not crucial</v>

01:36:55.680 --> 01:36:56.720
<v Speaker 3>to get fiddly.</v>

01:36:56.720 --> 01:37:01.680
<v Speaker 3>About three hundred years after Abraham's birth, Kohath is born.</v>

01:37:01.680 --> 01:37:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Kohath is the father of Amram.</v>

01:37:04.720 --> 01:37:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Amram is the father of Job.</v>

01:37:07.520 --> 01:37:09.840
<v Speaker 3>So the reason that I've included these additional</v>

01:37:10.720 --> 01:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>names after Jacob is that with the birth of Kohath, the birth</v>

01:37:16.080 --> 01:37:21.360
<v Speaker 3>of Amram, and then the birth of Moses, we've established typical generational</v>

01:37:21.360 --> 01:37:25.200
<v Speaker 3>intervals at that time in that place for those for those sons.</v>

01:37:25.200 --> 01:37:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Just like we were talking about the Genesis 5 and the Genesis</v>

01:37:27.920 --> 01:37:30.800
<v Speaker 3>11 intervals, they were all quite consistent.</v>

01:37:30.800 --> 01:37:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, we don't know to what degree that was typical at the</v>

01:37:33.920 --> 01:37:37.600
<v Speaker 3>time or to what degree God supernaturally intervened.</v>

01:37:37.600 --> 01:37:41.920
<v Speaker 3>There's no reason to believe it wasn't typical, but the particulars of</v>

01:37:41.920 --> 01:37:46.000
<v Speaker 3>any given man you can't extrapolate, but you can average.</v>

01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:48.320
<v Speaker 3>On average it was about one hundred and thirty years in the</v>

01:37:48.320 --> 01:37:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Genesis eleven chronologies.</v>

01:37:50.560 --> 01:37:52.800
<v Speaker 3>That's perfectly fine.</v>

01:37:52.800 --> 01:37:56.240
<v Speaker 3>So since we know for a fact from the genealogies, they give</v>

01:37:56.320 --> 01:38:02.880
<v Speaker 3>specific begetting dates, exactly how much time passed from Jacob through Moses,</v>

01:38:02.880 --> 01:38:08.880
<v Speaker 3>we can assume that other men would have had similar generational intervals.</v>

01:38:08.880 --> 01:38:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Not identical, but similar, certainly in the ballpark.</v>

01:38:12.400 --> 01:38:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So what I have done privately, and I'm not going to publish</v>

01:38:15.600 --> 01:38:18.400
<v Speaker 3>this, but I'm just making the case for why these numbers I</v>

01:38:18.400 --> 01:38:21.360
<v Speaker 3>think are absolutely plausible.</v>

01:38:21.360 --> 01:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, they're so plausible that concluding that this is not</v>

01:38:25.760 --> 01:38:27.200
<v Speaker 3>true becomes implausible.</v>

01:38:27.200 --> 01:38:30.720
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to shift the timelines radically to dismiss what I'm saying</v>

01:38:30.720 --> 01:38:35.200
<v Speaker 3>here. Assuming and this is the one big assumption in all of</v>

01:38:35.200 --> 01:38:38.240
<v Speaker 3>this, this is the one thing that is not established in scripture.</v>

01:38:38.240 --> 01:38:43.040
<v Speaker 3>We're not given the begetting dates of Esau's sons, certainly through Job.</v>

01:38:43.040 --> 01:38:46.560
<v Speaker 3>We're not told in Job forty-two or in Genesis thirty-six what the</v>

01:38:46.560 --> 01:38:47.920
<v Speaker 3>intervals were.</v>

01:38:47.920 --> 01:38:53.360
<v Speaker 3>But if we assume that they're comparable to the generations through Moses,</v>

01:38:53.360 --> 01:39:00.240
<v Speaker 3>then we would have Job being born in Edom 352 years after</v>

01:39:00.240 --> 01:39:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Abraham's death.</v>

01:39:01.920 --> 01:39:05.680
<v Speaker 3>That is the same year as Amaram is born, which is the</v>

01:39:05.680 --> 01:39:09.600
<v Speaker 3>assumption. So again, that's where the generational intervals are the same.</v>

01:39:09.600 --> 01:39:13.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a complete assumption, but it's gonna be within a few years.</v>

01:39:13.200 --> 01:39:15.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, even if it's off by ten years, it doesn't change</v>

01:39:15.600 --> 01:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the conclusion of the argument they'll be making here.</v>

01:39:18.560 --> 01:39:22.000
<v Speaker 3>But I'm acknowledging this is the one place where we don't know.</v>

01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>This is the one place where we cannot say this is accurate.</v>

01:39:26.160 --> 01:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>But everything predicated on the assumption is going to be precise because</v>

01:39:29.680 --> 01:39:32.080
<v Speaker 3>we have all the rest of the dates in scripture.</v>

01:39:32.160 --> 01:39:36.160
<v Speaker 3>So if we assume that the intervals were the same for Job,</v>

01:39:36.160 --> 01:39:40.800
<v Speaker 3>then and this is also using the sixth generation timeline for Job</v>

01:39:40.960 --> 01:39:41.840
<v Speaker 3>not the five.</v>

01:39:42.080 --> 01:39:46.640
<v Speaker 3>As I mentioned a minute ago, I think that the telescoping past</v>

01:39:46.960 --> 01:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Ragul we have to treat as something that's being alighted, but that</v>

01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:56.160
<v Speaker 3>man also existed, and therefore would have a similar generational interval.</v>

01:39:56.160 --> 01:39:58.800
<v Speaker 3>So I'm using the six generations and not the five that are</v>

01:39:58.800 --> 01:40:01.760
<v Speaker 3>five that are attested to in Job forty two.</v>

01:40:01.760 --> 01:40:05.600
<v Speaker 3>But I re-ran the numbers both ways and they work out pretty</v>

01:40:05.600 --> 01:40:06.720
<v Speaker 3>much either way.</v>

01:40:06.720 --> 01:40:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Assuming that there were six generations, which is from scripture with a</v>

01:40:11.440 --> 01:40:17.920
<v Speaker 3>minor caveat and assuming that the generations through Job from Esau were</v>

01:40:17.920 --> 01:40:21.520
<v Speaker 3>about the same, he's being born about the same time as Amram,</v>

01:40:21.520 --> 01:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>which means that Job was born just before Joseph dies.</v>

01:40:25.200 --> 01:40:27.040
<v Speaker 3>This would put Job's trials beginning</v>

01:40:28.160 --> 01:40:31.120
<v Speaker 3>almost the same year that Moses is born.</v>

01:40:31.120 --> 01:40:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Assuming identical durations for Job and Amram, Job's trials would begin four</v>

01:40:37.360 --> 01:40:41.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty-two years after Abraham, and Moses is born four hundred</v>

01:40:41.120 --> 01:40:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and twenty-five years after Abraham.</v>

01:40:42.640 --> 01:40:44.160
<v Speaker 3>So virtually the same time.</v>

01:40:44.160 --> 01:40:49.360
<v Speaker 3>So when Job's trials begin, he has been king for some time,</v>

01:40:49.360 --> 01:40:52.480
<v Speaker 3>like all this wealth, he's the king, his friends are kings.</v>

01:40:52.480 --> 01:40:54.320
<v Speaker 3>He's not a prince at this point.</v>

01:40:54.320 --> 01:40:56.240
<v Speaker 3>He's been in charge of Edom.</v>

01:40:56.240 --> 01:40:58.640
<v Speaker 3>He's been the king of Edom for some time.</v>

01:40:58.640 --> 01:41:02.720
<v Speaker 3>And remember the context from the beginning of Job, the discourse that</v>

01:41:03.120 --> 01:41:07.680
<v Speaker 3>occurs in the heavenly council, God holds Job forth as one of</v>

01:41:07.680 --> 01:41:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the most faithful men on the planet.</v>

01:41:09.600 --> 01:41:11.840
<v Speaker 3>He says there's none like him.</v>

01:41:11.840 --> 01:41:15.360
<v Speaker 3>And Job lived at the same time as Moses.</v>

01:41:15.360 --> 01:41:19.920
<v Speaker 3>While Moses was doing his thing in Egypt in slavery, along with</v>

01:41:19.920 --> 01:41:24.080
<v Speaker 3>all of the Hebrews, while they were all beleaguered and being beaten,</v>

01:41:24.080 --> 01:41:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and forced to do manual labor and killed unjustly and cruelly by</v>

01:41:28.400 --> 01:41:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the Egyptians?</v>

01:41:29.680 --> 01:41:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Job Job was blessed immeasurably by God, and Job was the subject</v>

01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:39.360
<v Speaker 3>of discussion, where the devil said, Well, of course he gives you</v>

01:41:39.360 --> 01:41:43.520
<v Speaker 3>glory. You've erected a hedge around him, nothing bad happens to him.</v>

01:41:43.840 --> 01:41:44.720
<v Speaker 3>This is the consequence.</v>

01:41:45.360 --> 01:41:46.800
<v Speaker 3>This is what matters.</v>

01:41:46.800 --> 01:41:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Even if we're off by a few years of Job's birth, because</v>

01:41:50.560 --> 01:41:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Job was a great grandson of Esau, he lived about the same</v>

01:41:54.240 --> 01:41:57.440
<v Speaker 3>time. He lived, you know, couple countries over.</v>

01:41:57.440 --> 01:42:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Edom wasn't far away from Egypt at that time.</v>

01:42:00.480 --> 01:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>They're not exactly neighbors, but it's not distant.</v>

01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Job was blessed, Joe is a powerful king.</v>

01:42:06.720 --> 01:42:08.880
<v Speaker 3>The Hebrews are in captivity.</v>

01:42:08.880 --> 01:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>They are being tormented, they're being abused, they're being killed unjustly.</v>

01:42:13.200 --> 01:42:17.280
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem if you have a Jewish centric view of the</v>

01:42:17.280 --> 01:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament.</v>

01:42:18.640 --> 01:42:23.120
<v Speaker 3>The deletion of Job existing at this time made it possible for</v>

01:42:23.120 --> 01:42:25.840
<v Speaker 3>us to forget that not only was Job a king, he was</v>

01:42:25.840 --> 01:42:29.040
<v Speaker 3>a specific king, he was a king of Edom, but when did</v>

01:42:29.040 --> 01:42:29.520
<v Speaker 3>he live?</v>

01:42:29.520 --> 01:42:34.000
<v Speaker 3>He lived at the same time as the Hebrews were being tormented.</v>

01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:38.240
<v Speaker 3>So moving ahead in this timeline that relates to Job, this is</v>

01:42:38.240 --> 01:42:41.920
<v Speaker 3>an absolute fact borne out from scripture to zero speculation here.</v>

01:42:41.920 --> 01:42:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Excess began 505 years after Abraham's birth.</v>

01:42:47.360 --> 01:42:47.840
<v Speaker 3>And then</v>

01:42:48.880 --> 01:42:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Israel attempts to pass through Edom, remember in Numbers twenty and Deuteronomy</v>

01:42:54.880 --> 01:42:58.400
<v Speaker 3>two, about thirty-nine to forty years later.</v>

01:42:58.400 --> 01:43:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Not sure precisely, I don't think, but it's at the very end</v>

01:43:01.360 --> 01:43:02.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Exodus.</v>

01:43:02.800 --> 01:43:05.760
<v Speaker 3>So this would be either be 544 or 545.</v>

01:43:05.760 --> 01:43:09.120
<v Speaker 3>We'll call 545 for the sake of roundness.</v>

01:43:09.120 --> 01:43:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So five hundred forty five years after Abraham is born, in the</v>

01:43:13.600 --> 01:43:19.280
<v Speaker 3>year of Abraham, we have Moses going to the king of Edom,</v>

01:43:19.280 --> 01:43:25.120
<v Speaker 3>unnamed in both the Septuagint and the Rabbinic text.</v>

01:43:25.120 --> 01:43:27.920
<v Speaker 3>We have the King of Edom saying, You're not coming in.</v>

01:43:27.920 --> 01:43:30.960
<v Speaker 3>If you try, we're gonna kill you.</v>

01:43:30.960 --> 01:43:33.280
<v Speaker 3>And it's described in a couple different ways.</v>

01:43:33.280 --> 01:43:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I gave the paraphrase the numbers 20 description of the event.</v>

01:43:37.760 --> 01:43:42.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm gonna read you the paragraph from Deuteronomy two.</v>

01:43:42.240 --> 01:43:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And we turned and departed into the wilderness by the way of</v>

01:43:45.120 --> 01:43:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the Red Sea as the Lord spoke to me, and we compassed</v>

01:43:47.760 --> 01:43:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Mount Seir many days.</v>

01:43:49.440 --> 01:43:51.840
<v Speaker 3>And the Lord said to me, You have compassed this mount long</v>

01:43:51.840 --> 01:43:56.320
<v Speaker 3>enough, turn therefore toward the north, and charge the people, saying, You</v>

01:43:56.320 --> 01:43:59.520
<v Speaker 3>are going through the borders of your brothers, the children of Esau,</v>

01:43:59.520 --> 01:44:03.440
<v Speaker 3>who dwell in Seir, and they shall fear you and dread you</v>

01:44:03.440 --> 01:44:07.680
<v Speaker 3>greatly. Do not engage in war against them, for I will not</v>

01:44:07.680 --> 01:44:11.600
<v Speaker 3>give you of their land even to set your foot upon, for</v>

01:44:11.600 --> 01:44:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I have given Mount Seir to the children of Esau as an</v>

01:44:14.960 --> 01:44:19.680
<v Speaker 3>inheritance. So this is a small bit of context that's missing from</v>

01:44:19.680 --> 01:44:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Numbers 20, but it's crucial.</v>

01:44:21.360 --> 01:44:24.160
<v Speaker 3>One, God said go over there.</v>

01:44:24.160 --> 01:44:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And God said chronologically go over there right after Moses struck the</v>

01:44:29.440 --> 01:44:33.120
<v Speaker 3>rock. So, you know, Moses leaves us out of the retelling in</v>

01:44:33.120 --> 01:44:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Deuteronomy 2.</v>

01:44:34.800 --> 01:44:38.640
<v Speaker 3>But he does say God says go through there, go over there,</v>

01:44:38.640 --> 01:44:43.440
<v Speaker 3>and he says something that needs to be treated carefully because the</v>

01:44:43.440 --> 01:44:47.040
<v Speaker 3>text is obvious, but only if you're not being nitpicky.</v>

01:44:47.040 --> 01:44:51.600
<v Speaker 3>God says you are going through the borders of your brothers, the</v>

01:44:51.600 --> 01:44:55.680
<v Speaker 3>children of Esau, which to us sounds like okay, going through the</v>

01:44:55.680 --> 01:44:59.680
<v Speaker 3>borders, I mean you're crossing the border, you're entering the country.</v>

01:44:59.680 --> 01:45:04.720
<v Speaker 3>In the original Greek text that's being translated by Brenton as through,</v>

01:45:04.720 --> 01:45:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that could just as easily say you are passing by, you are</v>

01:45:08.480 --> 01:45:13.040
<v Speaker 3>going alongside, or you are skirting the borders of your brothers.</v>

01:45:13.040 --> 01:45:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Any of those would be accurate, and true is also fine as</v>

01:45:17.120 --> 01:45:21.360
<v Speaker 3>long as you understand what's said just I think two verses later.</v>

01:45:21.360 --> 01:45:24.720
<v Speaker 3>I will not give you of their land even enough to set</v>

01:45:24.720 --> 01:45:26.480
<v Speaker 3>your foot upon.</v>

01:45:26.480 --> 01:45:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So</v>

01:45:27.680 --> 01:45:30.880
<v Speaker 3>again, the text itself makes clear that they didn't go into the</v>

01:45:30.880 --> 01:45:34.480
<v Speaker 3>land of Edom, but you just can't be lazy with the through</v>

01:45:34.480 --> 01:45:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the borders and think, well, they entered into it</v>

01:45:37.040 --> 01:45:40.240
<v Speaker 3>because Numbers twenty says the same thing it says they didn't go</v>

01:45:40.240 --> 01:45:44.320
<v Speaker 3>in because the army was amassed, and Deuteronomy two says 'cause they</v>

01:45:44.320 --> 01:45:45.280
<v Speaker 3>were terrified.</v>

01:45:45.280 --> 01:45:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Edom was terrified of this giant mass of, you know, probably a</v>

01:45:49.040 --> 01:45:52.960
<v Speaker 3>couple million people, 'cause remember six hundred thousand men had of households,</v>

01:45:52.960 --> 01:45:56.000
<v Speaker 3>that's women and children and slaves, whatever they brought with them.</v>

01:45:56.000 --> 01:45:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Probably a couple million people came out of Egypt.</v>

01:45:58.240 --> 01:46:01.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a lot of people in any place at any time.</v>

01:46:01.040 --> 01:46:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Certainly no small matter in this time, especially when these people are</v>

01:46:05.040 --> 01:46:10.960
<v Speaker 3>desperate. And particularly when Job undoubtedly was familiar with what was going</v>

01:46:10.960 --> 01:46:14.640
<v Speaker 3>on among the Hebrews when they were in Egypt.</v>

01:46:14.640 --> 01:46:18.960
<v Speaker 3>So, as I said, Scripture does not say that the king of</v>

01:46:18.960 --> 01:46:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Edom, who denies the Israelites' entry into Edom, doesn't say he's Job.</v>

01:46:24.320 --> 01:46:28.480
<v Speaker 3>But the Septuagint, which was deleted from the rabbinic text, says Job</v>

01:46:28.480 --> 01:46:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is a king of Edom</v>

01:46:30.160 --> 01:46:32.000
<v Speaker 3>at about this time.</v>

01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So the reason that I did all that timeline work that I'm</v>

01:46:34.640 --> 01:46:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm describing here is that assuming the generations of Job were similar</v>

01:46:40.160 --> 01:46:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to those of Moses, Job died nearly forty years after this.</v>

01:46:46.480 --> 01:46:51.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's basically impossible for the things to move around far enough,</v>

01:46:51.440 --> 01:46:55.840
<v Speaker 3>even assuming that my assumptions are not accurate, that I don't have</v>

01:46:55.840 --> 01:46:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the date pinpointed precisely.</v>

01:46:58.080 --> 01:47:00.800
<v Speaker 3>They would have to move so far in terms of generations by</v>

01:47:00.800 --> 01:47:05.360
<v Speaker 3>decades that it would cease to be plausible relative to the consistency</v>

01:47:05.360 --> 01:47:08.400
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen in the other places where we are given generational</v>

01:47:08.880 --> 01:47:14.080
<v Speaker 3>intervals. Remember the Genesis 11 intervals were very consistently 130 years.</v>

01:47:14.080 --> 01:47:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And that's not to say the interval I'm using here is not</v>

01:47:16.560 --> 01:47:17.840
<v Speaker 3>exactly 130 years.</v>

01:47:17.840 --> 01:47:21.440
<v Speaker 3>The interval I'm using is approximately the same that he was through</v>

01:47:21.520 --> 01:47:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of Moses.</v>

01:47:22.480 --> 01:47:25.360
<v Speaker 3>So why would they edit Job?</v>

01:47:25.360 --> 01:47:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Why would they remove these small details?</v>

01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:31.520
<v Speaker 3>On top of all the massive changes that Corey mentioned earlier, the</v>

01:47:31.520 --> 01:47:34.800
<v Speaker 3>small detail of all his friends being kings, of him being a</v>

01:47:34.800 --> 01:47:39.760
<v Speaker 3>king, because if he's a king of Edom and he is descended</v>

01:47:39.760 --> 01:47:42.640
<v Speaker 3>from Esau, which you'd expect as a king of Edom, like Edomites,</v>

01:47:42.640 --> 01:47:44.880
<v Speaker 3>those are the Esau's grandkids.</v>

01:47:44.880 --> 01:47:47.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's a foregone conclusion.</v>

01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:52.560
<v Speaker 3>But Job being a believer, being the most blessed man on the</v>

01:47:52.560 --> 01:47:58.480
<v Speaker 3>planet, above every living Hebrew, above Moses himself, above Moses and Aaron,</v>

01:47:58.480 --> 01:48:02.480
<v Speaker 3>whom God struck dead because of their disobedience, Job was not struck</v>

01:48:02.480 --> 01:48:06.080
<v Speaker 3>dead. He was given a double portion of what he had lost,</v>

01:48:06.080 --> 01:48:10.560
<v Speaker 3>including as many children again, because in the resurrection, he would have</v>

01:48:10.560 --> 01:48:12.080
<v Speaker 3>double the number of children.</v>

01:48:12.080 --> 01:48:15.520
<v Speaker 3>But livestock and all the things that aren't promised to be resurrected,</v>

01:48:15.520 --> 01:48:16.480
<v Speaker 3>it was doubled.</v>

01:48:16.480 --> 01:48:21.760
<v Speaker 3>He became twice as wealthy after his trials as before, because he</v>

01:48:21.760 --> 01:48:25.760
<v Speaker 3>was blessed by God because he was I don't think it's unreasonable</v>

01:48:25.760 --> 01:48:28.400
<v Speaker 3>to say uniquely faithful.</v>

01:48:28.400 --> 01:48:33.520
<v Speaker 3>This was occurring while the Hebrews were slaves to the Egyptians.</v>

01:48:33.520 --> 01:48:37.440
<v Speaker 3>If you were a god hating rabbi, is this something you might</v>

01:48:37.440 --> 01:48:43.360
<v Speaker 3>omit? To make a non Hebrew look better than you, more blessings,</v>

01:48:43.360 --> 01:48:48.560
<v Speaker 3>more wealth, greater accolades from God in the very moment of their</v>

01:48:48.560 --> 01:48:51.360
<v Speaker 3>destitution and their humiliation.</v>

01:48:51.360 --> 01:48:53.520
<v Speaker 3>This is not a small matter.</v>

01:48:53.520 --> 01:48:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And so as I said, I'm not publishing the chart that I</v>

01:48:56.000 --> 01:48:58.400
<v Speaker 3>came up with because I don't stand by it a hundred percent</v>

01:48:58.560 --> 01:49:00.480
<v Speaker 3>in terms of its accuracy.</v>

01:49:00.480 --> 01:49:02.480
<v Speaker 3>It could be off by a few years.</v>

01:49:02.480 --> 01:49:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely stand by the precision of the internal workings.</v>

01:49:06.480 --> 01:49:11.840
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to come up with a preposterous interval for Job's generations</v>

01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:15.360
<v Speaker 3>after Esau for him not to be this king.</v>

01:49:15.360 --> 01:49:17.120
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I actually ran the numbers twice.</v>

01:49:17.760 --> 01:49:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I also ran them with the five generation interval where you have</v>

01:49:22.240 --> 01:49:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Job forty two saying the was five from Abram.</v>

01:49:26.880 --> 01:49:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Even though I don't believe that that is precise 'cause I think</v>

01:49:30.160 --> 01:49:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that that's skipping Ragul, and I think that's a very Christian conclusion</v>

01:49:33.920 --> 01:49:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to reach.</v>

01:49:35.120 --> 01:49:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Even if we assume for the sake of argument that it's not</v>

01:49:37.520 --> 01:49:40.640
<v Speaker 3>six it's actually five, how do the numbers work out?</v>

01:49:40.640 --> 01:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Assuming identical generations, Job would be dying just three years before the</v>

01:49:46.640 --> 01:49:48.320
<v Speaker 3>end of the Exodus.</v>

01:49:48.320 --> 01:49:55.280
<v Speaker 3>So assuming exactly the same years between multiple generations of grandfathers, Job</v>

01:49:55.280 --> 01:49:58.880
<v Speaker 3>would have been just shortly dead, which I think makes it entirely</v>

01:49:58.880 --> 01:50:01.920
<v Speaker 3>believable that even in that scenario, which I don't agree with, I</v>

01:50:01.920 --> 01:50:04.720
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's realistic to delete Ragul.</v>

01:50:04.720 --> 01:50:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Even in that scenario, if you move the generations by just one</v>

01:50:08.640 --> 01:50:11.360
<v Speaker 3>year each, Job is the king again.</v>

01:50:11.360 --> 01:50:13.760
<v Speaker 3>That's how much of a margin of error there is for the</v>

01:50:13.760 --> 01:50:15.040
<v Speaker 3>assumptions I'm making.</v>

01:50:15.440 --> 01:50:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not publishing it 'cause I don't think it's accurate, but it's</v>

01:50:18.560 --> 01:50:20.400
<v Speaker 3>probably pretty close.</v>

01:50:20.400 --> 01:50:24.720
<v Speaker 3>And I do believe that there is no other reasonable conclusion.</v>

01:50:24.720 --> 01:50:28.800
<v Speaker 3>It's an inference, but I think it's a conclusion that any rational</v>

01:50:29.120 --> 01:50:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Christian who reads and can do math would reach the same conclusion.</v>

01:50:33.280 --> 01:50:37.520
<v Speaker 3>That Job was alive during the Exodus, he was alive during most</v>

01:50:37.520 --> 01:50:40.480
<v Speaker 3>of Moses' life, fact all of Moses' life.</v>

01:50:40.480 --> 01:50:43.920
<v Speaker 3>He lived longer, he was born before, and he died after.</v>

01:50:43.920 --> 01:50:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So his life entirely compassed Moses' life.</v>

01:50:46.960 --> 01:50:47.760
<v Speaker 3>He was more blessed.</v>

01:50:47.760 --> 01:50:51.200
<v Speaker 3>He was a more holy man, and he was not a descendant</v>

01:50:51.360 --> 01:50:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of Jacob, which means he wasn't an Israelite.</v>

01:50:54.400 --> 01:50:58.240
<v Speaker 3>This is a big problem if you have a Jewish supremacist view</v>

01:50:58.240 --> 01:51:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of the Old Testament, which is part of what dies when we</v>

01:51:01.760 --> 01:51:06.320
<v Speaker 3>readopt the Septuagint, as the early church held.</v>

01:51:06.320 --> 01:51:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Another small detail, but I think one that's potentially interesting.</v>

01:51:11.600 --> 01:51:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Because of Moses' position in Egypt being very high up, and because</v>

01:51:17.280 --> 01:51:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Job was a neighboring king, this is complete speculation.</v>

01:51:20.880 --> 01:51:22.480
<v Speaker 3>This may not be true at all.</v>

01:51:22.480 --> 01:51:26.720
<v Speaker 3>But it's entirely reasonable to speculate that Moses and Job may have</v>

01:51:26.720 --> 01:51:28.000
<v Speaker 3>met politically.</v>

01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:30.000
<v Speaker 3>It may well have been the case that they would have been</v>

01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:33.920
<v Speaker 3>in the same place at the same time, probably Moses being sent</v>

01:51:33.920 --> 01:51:36.480
<v Speaker 3>to Job being sent to Edom as an emissary.</v>

01:51:36.480 --> 01:51:41.280
<v Speaker 3>That's completely speculative, but given the overlap of their lives, it's entirely</v>

01:51:41.280 --> 01:51:43.520
<v Speaker 3>possible it happened for political reasons.</v>

01:51:43.520 --> 01:51:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Totally unrelated to anything in scripture, but just because of Moses' placement</v>

01:51:47.680 --> 01:51:51.120
<v Speaker 3>in Egyptian life, it could have been the case.</v>

01:51:51.360 --> 01:51:53.440
<v Speaker 3>That is how much overlap there is.</v>

01:51:53.440 --> 01:51:56.320
<v Speaker 3>So please don't quote me on that because that's it may or</v>

01:51:56.320 --> 01:51:56.960
<v Speaker 3>may not be true.</v>

01:51:56.960 --> 01:51:59.200
<v Speaker 3>We have no possible way to know.</v>

01:51:59.200 --> 01:52:04.080
<v Speaker 3>But they certainly lived at the same time and they absolutely lived</v>

01:52:04.080 --> 01:52:04.720
<v Speaker 3>at the same time.</v>

01:52:04.960 --> 01:52:06.960
<v Speaker 3>That's beyond any shadow of a doubt.</v>

01:52:06.960 --> 01:52:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's almost certain that Job had to be the king in</v>

01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Numbers twenty and in Deuteronomy two.</v>

01:52:14.880 --> 01:52:18.720
<v Speaker 3>That is a radical retelling of those stories of the omission that</v>

01:52:18.720 --> 01:52:21.120
<v Speaker 3>was made from the Greek.</v>

01:52:21.120 --> 01:52:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So this is the reason we're including this in the timeline episode</v>

01:52:25.120 --> 01:52:30.160
<v Speaker 3>here. Think about how wild that is to have this man suddenly</v>

01:52:30.160 --> 01:52:34.000
<v Speaker 3>have a place and a purpose, and have land given to him.</v>

01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:36.400
<v Speaker 3>This is last thing that I'll draw from this text I don't</v>

01:52:36.400 --> 01:52:39.600
<v Speaker 3>think we've really ever taken seriously before.</v>

01:52:39.600 --> 01:52:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Listen again to what God said of Job of the Edomites in</v>

01:52:44.560 --> 01:52:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Deuteronomy two.</v>

01:52:45.840 --> 01:52:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Do not engage in war against them, for I will not give</v>

01:52:48.560 --> 01:52:52.000
<v Speaker 3>you of their land, even to set your foot upon, for I</v>

01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:56.320
<v Speaker 3>have given Mount Seir to the children of Esau as an inheritance.</v>

01:52:56.320 --> 01:53:00.800
<v Speaker 3>And then in verse nine, shortly thereafter, God says again, do not</v>

01:53:00.800 --> 01:53:03.920
<v Speaker 3>quarrel with the Moabites, and do not engage with in war with</v>

01:53:03.920 --> 01:53:06.640
<v Speaker 3>them, for I will not give you of their land for an</v>

01:53:06.640 --> 01:53:10.480
<v Speaker 3>inheritance, for I have given Error to the children of Lot to</v>

01:53:10.480 --> 01:53:17.600
<v Speaker 3>inherit. The reason that these two throwaway verses matter so much is</v>

01:53:17.600 --> 01:53:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that this is exactly what Acts seventeen twenty six says.</v>

01:53:20.880 --> 01:53:25.520
<v Speaker 3>How often in Corrie and I have we mentioned where God says</v>

01:53:25.760 --> 01:53:29.200
<v Speaker 3>and he made from one man every nation of mankind to live</v>

01:53:29.200 --> 01:53:33.040
<v Speaker 3>on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and</v>

01:53:33.040 --> 01:53:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the boundaries of their dwelling place that they should seek God and</v>

01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:40.080
<v Speaker 3>perhaps feel their way towards him and find him.</v>

01:53:40.080 --> 01:53:42.560
<v Speaker 3>God gave the Moabites their land.</v>

01:53:42.560 --> 01:53:45.280
<v Speaker 3>God gave the Edomites their land.</v>

01:53:45.280 --> 01:53:47.520
<v Speaker 3>God spoke to Job.</v>

01:53:47.520 --> 01:53:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Job was a Christian.</v>

01:53:49.120 --> 01:53:52.880
<v Speaker 3>And given the conduct of Job's friends, the kings of the neighboring</v>

01:53:52.880 --> 01:53:56.640
<v Speaker 3>countries, we have every reason to believe that they were Christians too.</v>

01:53:56.640 --> 01:53:59.680
<v Speaker 3>They were poor, certainly theologically.</v>

01:53:59.680 --> 01:54:05.280
<v Speaker 3>The conclusion of Job is that God required a sacrifice and prayer</v>

01:54:05.280 --> 01:54:08.560
<v Speaker 3>from Job so that he would not kill his friends because of</v>

01:54:08.560 --> 01:54:10.400
<v Speaker 3>their sin against him.</v>

01:54:10.400 --> 01:54:15.040
<v Speaker 3>But while they were speaking, they were not speaking pagan blasphemies against</v>

01:54:15.040 --> 01:54:18.160
<v Speaker 3>God. They were spouting bad theology.</v>

01:54:18.160 --> 01:54:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Better theology than most of our pastors to day, less blasphemous things</v>

01:54:22.320 --> 01:54:26.800
<v Speaker 3>than you hear from most pulpits today, nevertheless warranting death from God.</v>

01:54:26.800 --> 01:54:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Yet for the sake of Job's prayer, God forgave them.</v>

01:54:30.560 --> 01:54:33.600
<v Speaker 3>That means that all those neighboring countries were Christian too for a</v>

01:54:33.600 --> 01:54:35.120
<v Speaker 3>time. It was all lost.</v>

01:54:35.120 --> 01:54:38.080
<v Speaker 3>All those countries eventually apostatized.</v>

01:54:38.080 --> 01:54:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Edom, certainly, if not chiefly, as bad as any, because what we</v>

01:54:42.320 --> 01:54:45.040
<v Speaker 3>see from Edom later by the time the first time they had</v>

01:54:45.040 --> 01:54:50.160
<v Speaker 3>malicious conflict is in the days of the kings of Israel.</v>

01:54:50.160 --> 01:54:53.840
<v Speaker 3>By then, the Edomites were truly wicked and depraved.</v>

01:54:53.840 --> 01:54:58.160
<v Speaker 3>They had lost the faith of their fathers, but crucially, their fathers</v>

01:54:58.160 --> 01:54:59.680
<v Speaker 3>had the faith of Abraham.</v>

01:54:59.680 --> 01:55:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Their fathers had the Christian faith.</v>

01:55:02.160 --> 01:55:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Job's in heaven 'cause he's a Christian.</v>

01:55:04.560 --> 01:55:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Job was never a Jew.</v>

01:55:09.360 --> 01:55:09.520
As

01:55:09.520 --> 01:55:14.240
<v Speaker 2>we've been going through these different sections of the Old Testament, you</v>

01:55:14.240 --> 01:55:18.080
<v Speaker 2>may have noticed that there is a theme to some of the</v>

01:55:18.080 --> 01:55:21.440
<v Speaker 2>edits that the rabbis made to the text, and I will get</v>

01:55:21.440 --> 01:55:26.320
<v Speaker 2>into this more with three main types of edits they made, changes</v>

01:55:26.320 --> 01:55:29.120
<v Speaker 2>they made to the text, and my conclusion.</v>

01:55:29.120 --> 01:55:32.480
<v Speaker 2>There's one salient one here in Job that I want to cover</v>

01:55:32.480 --> 01:55:34.960
<v Speaker 2>before we move on to Esther.</v>

01:55:34.960 --> 01:55:38.640
<v Speaker 2>And that is from back in Job chapter two, verse three.</v>

01:55:38.640 --> 01:55:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll read first from the Masoretic text and then from the Septuagint.</v>

01:55:43.840 --> 01:55:47.760
<v Speaker 2>And the Lord said to Satan, Have you considered my servant Job,</v>

01:55:47.760 --> 01:55:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and</v>

01:55:50.560 --> 01:55:54.240
<v Speaker 2>upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?</v>

01:55:54.240 --> 01:55:59.120
<v Speaker 2>He still holds fast his integrity, although you incited me against him</v>

01:55:59.280 --> 01:56:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to destroy him without reason.</v>

01:56:02.160 --> 01:56:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And then from the Septuagint.</v>

01:56:04.640 --> 01:56:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And the Lord said to the devil, Have you given heed then</v>

01:56:07.920 --> 01:56:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to my servant Job, that there is no one like him upon</v>

01:56:10.800 --> 01:56:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the earth, a man who is innocent, truthful, blameless, God fearing, keeping</v>

01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:20.240
<v Speaker 2>far from every evil, and still he has his integrity, though you</v>

01:56:20.240 --> 01:56:23.840
<v Speaker 2>sought to destroy his possessions to no purpose.</v>

01:56:25.280 --> 01:56:28.560
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the changes, one of the types of changes</v>

01:56:28.560 --> 01:56:33.040
<v Speaker 2>we see so often in the Masoretic text, in the rabbinic text.</v>

01:56:33.040 --> 01:56:36.480
<v Speaker 2>They diminish the role of God, and even go so far as</v>

01:56:36.480 --> 01:56:39.440
<v Speaker 2>to make God seem capricious.</v>

01:56:39.440 --> 01:56:42.880
<v Speaker 2>You may remember some instances of that from the episode we did</v>

01:56:42.880 --> 01:56:44.640
<v Speaker 2>on the wisdom literature.</v>

01:56:44.640 --> 01:56:46.240
<v Speaker 2>This is just another one of those.</v>

01:56:46.240 --> 01:56:51.520
<v Speaker 2>There is a difference between God saying that Satan sought to destroy</v>

01:56:51.520 --> 01:56:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Job, and of course God permitted it, we don't deny that, because</v>

01:56:54.960 --> 01:56:58.720
<v Speaker 2>everything is in God's hands, and any evil that occurs God has</v>

01:56:58.960 --> 01:57:01.200
<v Speaker 2>permitted it by not stopping it.</v>

01:57:01.200 --> 01:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>But there is a difference between that and saying, you incited me.</v>

01:57:07.040 --> 01:57:12.080
<v Speaker 2>The rabbinic text gives to Satan a power he does not have,</v>

01:57:12.080 --> 01:57:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and diminishes God in a way that is utterly impermissible.</v>

01:57:15.520 --> 01:57:19.200
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those verses that causes many Christians to struggle</v>

01:57:19.280 --> 01:57:25.680
<v Speaker 2>because it seems like Satan almost manipulated God into doing something.</v>

01:57:25.680 --> 01:57:30.720
<v Speaker 2>That problem simply evaporates when you read the actual text of Job,</v>

01:57:30.720 --> 01:57:31.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's not there.</v>

01:57:31.520 --> 01:57:38.800
<v Speaker 2>It's something that was added impermissibly, wickedly by the rabbis.</v>

01:57:38.800 --> 01:57:42.560
<v Speaker 2>And so for the final section of this episode, we will be</v>

01:57:42.560 --> 01:57:43.760
<v Speaker 2>going Be going over</v>

01:57:44.640 --> 01:57:47.920
<v Speaker 2>in fairly large part, actually, the Book of Esther.</v>

01:57:47.920 --> 01:57:50.720
<v Speaker 2>This episode, as you may have guessed, or if you actually looked</v>

01:57:50.720 --> 01:57:54.560
<v Speaker 2>at the runtime, is going to be a little bit long, perhaps</v>

01:57:54.560 --> 01:57:58.720
<v Speaker 2>making up for some past episodes we skipped, but this is just</v>

01:57:58.720 --> 01:58:01.760
<v Speaker 2>one of those episodes where there's a great deal to cover, and</v>

01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I can already say that what we're going to cover in Esther</v>

01:58:05.360 --> 01:58:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is not trivial, either in terms of the content or in terms</v>

01:58:09.920 --> 01:58:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of the volume of it.</v>

01:58:12.160 --> 01:58:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Because the Book of Esther, as it is in the Masoretic text,</v>

01:58:17.440 --> 01:58:21.760
<v Speaker 2>is simply a fundamentally different work from the Book of Esther in</v>

01:58:22.480 --> 01:58:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the actual Old Testament.</v>

01:58:25.120 --> 01:58:29.200
<v Speaker 2>The Book of Esther in the Masoretic Text is a book that</v>

01:58:29.200 --> 01:58:35.200
<v Speaker 2>has caused many Christians to wrestle, to struggle down through the centuries.</v>

01:58:35.200 --> 01:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Luther did not like the Book of Esther.</v>

01:58:38.800 --> 01:58:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Now it's worth noting that some of the quotes attributed to Luther</v>

01:58:43.280 --> 01:58:46.960
<v Speaker 2>come from his table talks, those are unreliable, and there are others</v>

01:58:47.520 --> 01:58:53.680
<v Speaker 2>where Latin translators confuse the book Esdras with the book Esther, which</v>

01:58:53.680 --> 01:58:55.520
<v Speaker 2>is scripture.</v>

01:58:55.520 --> 01:59:00.240
<v Speaker 2>But even setting those aside, Luther was not fond of Esther.</v>

01:59:00.240 --> 01:59:03.280
<v Speaker 2>The great The great irony is that Luther was right and wrong</v>

01:59:03.280 --> 01:59:09.600
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously. He was right because he was reading the rabbinic text, and</v>

01:59:09.600 --> 01:59:14.000
<v Speaker 2>he couldn't find God because the rabbis removed God</v>

01:59:15.120 --> 01:59:19.200
<v Speaker 2>and But he also could have just read the Greek.</v>

01:59:19.200 --> 01:59:22.320
<v Speaker 2>He could have read the Septuagint, and then all of those problems</v>

01:59:22.320 --> 01:59:23.920
<v Speaker 2>would have been resolved.</v>

01:59:23.920 --> 01:59:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Because in the Septuagint, the book of Esther is a thoroughly Christian</v>

01:59:28.880 --> 01:59:33.040
<v Speaker 2>book. And as we'll mention, one of the great ironies is that</v>

01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the Jews actually look pretty good in the book of Esther.</v>

01:59:36.400 --> 01:59:39.440
<v Speaker 2>They don't look so good in the Rabbinic text because the Rabbinic</v>

01:59:39.440 --> 01:59:42.720
<v Speaker 2>text is basically a revenge fantasy of the Jews.</v>

01:59:42.720 --> 01:59:43.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what they did.</v>

01:59:43.360 --> 01:59:48.160
<v Speaker 2>They took scripture and turned it into a revenge fantasy.</v>

01:59:48.160 --> 01:59:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Even the best construction of Esther in the Masoretic text.</v>

01:59:51.760 --> 01:59:53.600
<v Speaker 2>It is a secular book.</v>

01:59:53.600 --> 01:59:56.800
<v Speaker 2>It is a book about court intrigue, it is a book about</v>

01:59:56.800 --> 02:00:02.480
<v Speaker 2>international, incidentally politics, slightly less international than in the correct reading in</v>

02:00:02.480 --> 02:00:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the Septuagint.</v>

02:00:04.080 --> 02:00:05.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that.</v>

02:00:05.600 --> 02:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>But it is a different thing.</v>

02:00:06.960 --> 02:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>It is not a spiritual book.</v>

02:00:09.520 --> 02:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>It is not a Christian book.</v>

02:00:11.440 --> 02:00:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And so our ancestors, back through the ages in the church, were</v>

02:00:16.240 --> 02:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>right to question why is this in scripture?</v>

02:00:19.280 --> 02:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Should this be in Scripture?</v>

02:00:20.960 --> 02:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Is this Scripture?</v>

02:00:23.280 --> 02:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>The answer is assuredly yes, when you actually read the text of</v>

02:00:30.480 --> 02:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Scripture, when you pay attention to what God has actually preserved in</v>

02:00:34.480 --> 02:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>his Word, instead of what the rabbis edited and handed to us.</v>

02:00:39.120 --> 02:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Because God is all over the Septuagint version.</v>

02:00:42.720 --> 02:00:45.840
<v Speaker 2>There are prayers to God, the name of God is there, which</v>

02:00:45.840 --> 02:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>is something that is notably absent from the Masoretic text.</v>

02:00:49.440 --> 02:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>There are explanations of what's going on in this book, the letters</v>

02:00:54.240 --> 02:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that are referenced in certain places in the Masoretic text are actually</v>

02:00:57.920 --> 02:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>present, preserved for us, in the Greek text.</v>

02:01:02.720 --> 02:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a fundamentally different book.</v>

02:01:06.160 --> 02:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>They are not comparable between the two.</v>

02:01:08.320 --> 02:01:12.960
<v Speaker 2>There are places in the Old Testament and elsewhere where the differences</v>

02:01:12.960 --> 02:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>aren't that great.</v>

02:01:14.080 --> 02:01:15.680
<v Speaker 2>There are some places where</v>

02:01:16.560 --> 02:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the rabbinic text and the Greek text are identical.</v>

02:01:20.880 --> 02:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Just different languages, and you know you have to read the rabbinic</v>

02:01:24.320 --> 02:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>text in the right way, add in those vowels.</v>

02:01:28.080 --> 02:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>This is not one of those.</v>

02:01:30.320 --> 02:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>This is again a wholly different book in the Greek versus the</v>

02:01:36.160 --> 02:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>so-called Hebrew.</v>

02:01:38.000 --> 02:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>And we are poorer in the church for the fact that we</v>

02:01:42.800 --> 02:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>have been using the edited to be charitable rabbinic text for so</v>

02:01:47.920 --> 02:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>long.</v>

02:01:50.960 --> 02:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>There are a number of main differences, which is to say there</v>

02:01:55.120 --> 02:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>are sections which the rabbis just deleted.</v>

02:01:57.200 --> 02:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the cases in which they were certainly a</v>

02:02:00.640 --> 02:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit more blunt with their use of their instruments.</v>

02:02:05.280 --> 02:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Because there are six sections that are simply absent.</v>

02:02:09.680 --> 02:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>They deleted them wholesale from the Greek when they were creating the</v>

02:02:13.760 --> 02:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Rubinic text.</v>

02:02:15.360 --> 02:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>We will go over those in part.</v>

02:02:17.040 --> 02:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to read them in whole because we'd basically be</v>

02:02:19.840 --> 02:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>reading almost the entire book of Esther if we did that.</v>

02:02:24.560 --> 02:02:24.880
As

02:02:24.880 --> 02:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Cory mentioned about Luther and I mentioned in I think the last</v>

02:02:28.000 --> 02:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>episode, one of the recent episodes, I made a comment that I</v>

02:02:31.440 --> 02:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>want to withdraw.</v>

02:02:32.800 --> 02:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I said that Luther did not want to translate it at all</v>

02:02:35.760 --> 02:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>because he didn't believe that it should be in the Bible He</v>

02:02:39.680 --> 02:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>was not a fan, but the thing that I said is a</v>

02:02:43.600 --> 02:02:46.960
<v Speaker 3>story that I've heard my whole life, you know, well before the</v>

02:02:46.960 --> 02:02:50.640
<v Speaker 3>internet. But as I was doing some more research, I found a</v>

02:02:50.640 --> 02:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>page. There's a guy, his blog is called Beggars All Reformation.</v>

02:02:54.720 --> 02:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>He's some reformed guy that for whatever reason has been meticulously documenting</v>

02:02:59.520 --> 02:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>stuff said about Luther for decades now.</v>

02:03:02.400 --> 02:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>And he's very good at digging up original sources, finding the genealogies</v>

02:03:06.880 --> 02:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>of every single claim that have ever been made about Luther and</v>

02:03:09.520 --> 02:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a number of other guys.</v>

02:03:10.880 --> 02:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He goes into great detail in the origins of the story of</v>

02:03:15.040 --> 02:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the claim that Luther wanted to remove Esther from the Bible.</v>

02:03:18.160 --> 02:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember the specifics of how far back it went, but</v>

02:03:21.520 --> 02:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>what he wrote changed my mind to the point I can't say</v>

02:03:24.160 --> 02:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>confidently what I said previously.</v>

02:03:26.400 --> 02:03:29.920
<v Speaker 3>So consider this a retraction of my claim, I don't want someone</v>

02:03:30.000 --> 02:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>to go around repeating it because of what I said.</v>

02:03:32.080 --> 02:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I it could still be right, and maybe this blogger is wrong,</v>

02:03:35.440 --> 02:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>but he's very good at looking this stuff up.</v>

02:03:37.680 --> 02:03:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't cite it truthfully anymore, even if it is still accurate.</v>

02:03:42.800 --> 02:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to note that even if it's fake, even</v>

02:03:46.640 --> 02:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>if that's an apocryphal story, which it may or may not be,</v>

02:03:49.840 --> 02:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>it's entirely believable because Esther is so bad.</v>

02:03:54.400 --> 02:03:57.760
<v Speaker 3>There is not a single mention of God in the entire book.</v>

02:03:58.560 --> 02:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>It is literally a godless book in our Bibles.</v>

02:04:02.000 --> 02:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>So this has long been observed.</v>

02:04:04.000 --> 02:04:08.800
<v Speaker 3>And that was part of the perhaps, perhaps not apocryphal claims about</v>

02:04:08.800 --> 02:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Luther's view of it.</v>

02:04:11.120 --> 02:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>But But I think the fact that there is such a radical</v>

02:04:15.200 --> 02:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>difference between the Septuagint and what the rabbis did to Aster, that</v>

02:04:20.160 --> 02:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the fact that such a claim is believable is a big part</v>

02:04:24.080 --> 02:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of the story.</v>

02:04:25.040 --> 02:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>If Luther said and did that, he would have been entirely justified</v>

02:04:28.240 --> 02:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in doing so.</v>

02:04:29.440 --> 02:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>But I can't stand by the claim that that w occurred.</v>

02:04:32.640 --> 02:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>So maybe it did, maybe it doesn't.</v>

02:04:34.320 --> 02:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>We'll put a link in the show notes to that so you</v>

02:04:36.800 --> 02:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>can have that referred to as well.</v>

02:04:38.720 --> 02:04:41.600
<v Speaker 3>One other thing that I'll note before we get into the textual</v>

02:04:41.600 --> 02:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>differences themselves.</v>

02:04:43.200 --> 02:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>The three great once that we've talked about earlier, the Greek codices</v>

02:04:47.360 --> 02:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>of the entire Bible.</v>

02:04:49.440 --> 02:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>The so-called B-text.</v>

02:04:51.520 --> 02:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>They call it the B-text because they think it's probably a little</v>

02:04:54.080 --> 02:04:58.720
<v Speaker 3>bit newer in terms of when it was actually recorded physically.</v>

02:04:58.720 --> 02:05:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Those are Cyanaticus and Vaticanus.</v>

02:05:02.160 --> 02:05:07.680
<v Speaker 3>The B-text of Esther, which also includes Papyrus nine sixty seven, which</v>

02:05:07.680 --> 02:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>is dates from the late second century, so a couple of years</v>

02:05:11.120 --> 02:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>older than the Ansials.</v>

02:05:13.200 --> 02:05:15.600
<v Speaker 3>And then we have the so called A Text, which is now</v>

02:05:15.600 --> 02:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Xandrinus, that's slightly shorter, but not remotely to the same degree as</v>

02:05:20.560 --> 02:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the rabbinic changes.</v>

02:05:22.080 --> 02:05:26.560
<v Speaker 3>It has the same content that we're going to talk about here.</v>

02:05:26.560 --> 02:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>So in effect, all three, actually four versions of the Greek text</v>

02:05:31.200 --> 02:05:35.360
<v Speaker 3>that we can refer to have what we're talking about here.</v>

02:05:35.360 --> 02:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>They are attested to for 1800 years.</v>

02:05:38.960 --> 02:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Esther, interestingly, if you care about the Qumran Caves, which we said</v>

02:05:44.320 --> 02:05:48.720
<v Speaker 3>previously you shouldn't, but it's notable that Esther's not in there at</v>

02:05:48.720 --> 02:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>all, one way or another.</v>

02:05:49.760 --> 02:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>The book literally isn't present.</v>

02:05:51.920 --> 02:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Both Josephus and Jerome attest to the rabbinic form of Esther.</v>

02:05:59.120 --> 02:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>So what we find in the Masoretic text in 1000 AD was</v>

02:06:04.000 --> 02:06:06.080
<v Speaker 3>not brand new a thousand years ago.</v>

02:06:06.080 --> 02:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>It was in use at the time of Josephus soap two thousand</v>

02:06:09.760 --> 02:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>years ago.</v>

02:06:11.440 --> 02:06:16.080
<v Speaker 3>What is interesting about Jerome is that despite how much he despised</v>

02:06:16.080 --> 02:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the Septuagint, enough to go all this extra work to learn Hebrew</v>

02:06:19.760 --> 02:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and doctor Abbis 'cause I already knew Greek, to do all this</v>

02:06:23.440 --> 02:06:29.280
<v Speaker 3>extra work just to throw out the Greek, he still was basically</v>

02:06:29.280 --> 02:06:35.520
<v Speaker 3>forced to include these so called additions to Esther in the Vulgate.</v>

02:06:35.760 --> 02:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Now what Jerome did that's been repeated since Jerome by some but</v>

02:06:40.480 --> 02:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>not all Roman Catholic Bibles was what we're going to talk about</v>

02:06:44.640 --> 02:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>here, the so-called additions, appear at the end.</v>

02:06:48.720 --> 02:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking at one of the Roman Catholic Bibles in English</v>

02:06:52.800 --> 02:06:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that are based on the Vulgate and preserve Jerome's ordering, what you</v>

02:06:57.280 --> 02:07:01.920
<v Speaker 3>will find is the Protestant rabbinic version of Esther that we're familiar</v>

02:07:01.920 --> 02:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>with, it's totally godless.</v>

02:07:04.080 --> 02:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And then at the end of it, just tacked on to a</v>

02:07:08.000 --> 02:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>very short chapter, otherwise incidentally, the so called editions are just stuck</v>

02:07:13.280 --> 02:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>there at the end.</v>

02:07:14.480 --> 02:07:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Where they make no sense chronologically, like bits of the story appearing</v>

02:07:18.480 --> 02:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>at the end as an appendix in narrative wise is totally nonsensical.</v>

02:07:23.280 --> 02:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>But many Roman Catholic churches preserve what Jerome did, but even Jerome</v>

02:07:27.280 --> 02:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>included them.</v>

02:07:28.000 --> 02:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Jerome did not delete them, even though the rabbis deleted them.</v>

02:07:31.280 --> 02:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>He basically his hand was forced and he put him in there,</v>

02:07:33.840 --> 02:07:35.280
<v Speaker 3>but he stuck him at the end.</v>

02:07:35.280 --> 02:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>There are actually, thankfully, some Roman Catholic Bibles that not only include</v>

02:07:40.400 --> 02:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the full text of Esther, but they put it in the correct</v>

02:07:43.760 --> 02:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>places in the story.</v>

02:07:45.280 --> 02:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Because chapter one verse one is something that is only present in</v>

02:07:51.760 --> 02:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the Greek.</v>

02:07:52.640 --> 02:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Where Esther begins in our Bibles, if you're Protestants, is not where</v>

02:07:55.920 --> 02:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Esther begins.</v>

02:07:56.720 --> 02:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>There's a bunch of stuff before that.</v>

02:07:58.480 --> 02:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Just like in Job, there's a bunch of stuff at the end</v>

02:08:00.480 --> 02:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that got chopped off.</v>

02:08:02.320 --> 02:08:05.680
<v Speaker 3>So Esther, I think, is a particularly interesting case.</v>

02:08:05.680 --> 02:08:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll pop top all the changes we're going to get into for</v>

02:08:08.400 --> 02:08:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Protestantism is uniquely positioned as rejecting entirely what is</v>

02:08:14.240 --> 02:08:16.960
<v Speaker 3>scriptural. We screwed up badly.</v>

02:08:17.920 --> 02:08:20.960
<v Speaker 3>We listened to rabbis when we should have listened to God.</v>

02:08:20.960 --> 02:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>And as a result, we ended up with a totally godless book</v>

02:08:23.120 --> 02:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>in our Bibles.</v>

02:08:24.160 --> 02:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll put a link in a show notes to a yet another</v>

02:08:26.400 --> 02:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>blog post.</v>

02:08:26.880 --> 02:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>This is probably gonna have more show notes than a lot lately.</v>

02:08:29.840 --> 02:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>A page dedicated to Esther that also goes through this stuff kind</v>

02:08:32.880 --> 02:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>of line by line showing you where stuff was removed and added</v>

02:08:36.160 --> 02:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>with some commentaries.</v>

02:08:37.520 --> 02:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>That'll be very helpful as you're trying to get your bearings.</v>

02:08:39.760 --> 02:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a link I've shared on X a number of times.</v>

02:08:42.000 --> 02:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>And it's mind blowing.</v>

02:08:43.280 --> 02:08:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Like what we're gonna talk about here next is absolutely mind blowing</v>

02:08:47.200 --> 02:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>how it's not the same book.</v>

02:08:49.280 --> 02:08:51.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not the same book, it's not the same story.</v>

02:08:52.080 --> 02:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing about what we know about Esther that's true.</v>

02:08:55.600 --> 02:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Even some of the specific details were changed where the text is</v>

02:08:59.440 --> 02:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the same.</v>

02:09:00.240 --> 02:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>There are changes made to the details that render it worse, less</v>

02:09:04.400 --> 02:09:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Christian. The way you will hear these things referred to in scholarship,</v>

02:09:09.120 --> 02:09:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to mention it just so if you want to</v>

02:09:10.960 --> 02:09:14.880
<v Speaker 3>go Google this stuff, you can follow along with us, is a</v>

02:09:14.880 --> 02:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>problem of framing.</v>

02:09:16.720 --> 02:09:20.320
<v Speaker 3>There are six so-called additions to Esther.</v>

02:09:20.320 --> 02:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>There's additions A through F.</v>

02:09:22.560 --> 02:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>These additions are present in the Septuagint, they're not present in the</v>

02:09:26.000 --> 02:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>rabbinic text.</v>

02:09:27.120 --> 02:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, of course, it's begging the question to call them additions because</v>

02:09:30.400 --> 02:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that assumes that they were added in the Greek and not that</v>

02:09:33.840 --> 02:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>they were subtracted from the rabbinic text, which is blatantly the case.</v>

02:09:39.520 --> 02:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Like the story changes, it finally makes sense.</v>

02:09:42.400 --> 02:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>It's finally a godly Christian book.</v>

02:09:44.640 --> 02:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Once you see the intact Greek text translated in English.</v>

02:09:48.000 --> 02:09:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, this is a great book.</v>

02:09:49.840 --> 02:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>As we said, it actually makes the Jews look really good.</v>

02:09:53.040 --> 02:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>If all we were trying to do is make Jews look bad,</v>

02:09:55.840 --> 02:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>we would keep the version of Esther that they sold us.</v>

02:09:58.880 --> 02:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not a good book.</v>

02:10:00.480 --> 02:10:06.240
<v Speaker 3>And unfortunately for five centuries, because Protestants listen to the rabbis' lies,</v>

02:10:06.240 --> 02:10:10.720
<v Speaker 3>they have been coming up with excuses for how vile Esther is.</v>

02:10:10.720 --> 02:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>It's always rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, not everybody.</v>

02:10:13.360 --> 02:10:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Some people, oh, it's I love it.</v>

02:10:14.800 --> 02:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>it's it's so great.</v>

02:10:15.840 --> 02:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>It's totally godless and full of murder.</v>

02:10:17.440 --> 02:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>It's great.</v>

02:10:18.960 --> 02:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>That is</v>

02:10:20.480 --> 02:10:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Jews terraforming our souls.</v>

02:10:22.960 --> 02:10:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So contending with this is going to be contending with five centuries</v>

02:10:27.440 --> 02:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>of Protestant theologians not listening to the voice of God and making</v>

02:10:33.280 --> 02:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>profound errors downstream.</v>

02:10:34.880 --> 02:10:39.120
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna make arguments that say things that were convincing and Enough</v>

02:10:39.120 --> 02:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>for people that Esther was left in our Bibles to this day.</v>

02:10:42.640 --> 02:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Esther has a rifle and high place in the Old Testament.</v>

02:10:46.400 --> 02:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>And when it's intact, it's right where it should be.</v>

02:10:50.160 --> 02:10:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Just want you to remember, we'll probably call these additions throughout.</v>

02:10:52.720 --> 02:10:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I will try to call them subtractions because that's what they are.</v>

02:10:56.080 --> 02:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>These are deletions from God's Word.</v>

02:10:58.400 --> 02:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>These are deletions that will incur the wrath of Revelation twenty two.</v>

02:11:02.880 --> 02:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>But when we refer to addition A through F, just know that</v>

02:11:06.160 --> 02:11:07.280
<v Speaker 3>that's what's going on.</v>

02:11:07.280 --> 02:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>They're chunks.</v>

02:11:08.240 --> 02:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Entire chunks are just deleted.</v>

02:11:10.000 --> 02:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Pages gone.</v>

02:11:11.120 --> 02:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Not like a couple sentences.</v>

02:11:13.120 --> 02:11:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Entire chapters effectively have been deleted from Esther.</v>

02:11:17.200 --> 02:11:17.440
So

02:11:17.440 --> 02:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So the what are usually called additions, but and should in fact</v>

02:11:21.760 --> 02:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>be called subtractions, there are six of them A through F is</v>

02:11:25.200 --> 02:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>how they are typically labeled in the Bibles that include them.</v>

02:11:30.400 --> 02:11:34.960
<v Speaker 2>A is A is Mordecai's dream, which is a foretelling of things</v>

02:11:34.960 --> 02:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to come.</v>

02:11:35.600 --> 02:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't necessarily understand all of it at the time, but he</v>

02:11:38.640 --> 02:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>understands it later, which comes into a later subtraction.</v>

02:11:43.440 --> 02:11:47.600
<v Speaker 2>B is the full text of the King's decree pursuant to the</v>

02:11:47.600 --> 02:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>request of Haman, Haman, however you want to pronounce his name, it</v>

02:11:50.560 --> 02:11:53.520
<v Speaker 2>hardly matters.</v>

02:11:53.520 --> 02:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Section C contains prayers.</v>

02:11:56.960 --> 02:12:00.960
<v Speaker 2>And this is a very key difference, a rather important difference between</v>

02:12:00.960 --> 02:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the Masoretic text and the Septuagint, because of course, there's no real</v>

02:12:06.000 --> 02:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>prayer of any kind in the Masoretic text, in the Rabbinic text.</v>

02:12:10.720 --> 02:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just fasting and it's a focus on this scheming and the</v>

02:12:14.480 --> 02:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>court intrigue.</v>

02:12:15.760 --> 02:12:19.680
<v Speaker 2>But here you have Mordecai and Esther both calling on God.</v>

02:12:19.680 --> 02:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>A fundamentally different thing from the rabbinic text.</v>

02:12:24.160 --> 02:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Then you have a description in D of Esther's approach to the</v>

02:12:28.480 --> 02:12:31.680
<v Speaker 2>king, and you have the behavior of the king.</v>

02:12:31.680 --> 02:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>These things are different from how they are portrayed in the Masoretic</v>

02:12:35.200 --> 02:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>text, because of course the rabbis wanted to minimize the role of</v>

02:12:39.280 --> 02:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the king and also the piousness, the piety of the king.</v>

02:12:42.960 --> 02:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to make him seem like some foreign tyrant instead.</v>

02:12:47.760 --> 02:12:51.040
<v Speaker 2>And then in E, you have the full text of the second</v>

02:12:51.600 --> 02:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>decree, which is overturning the one from Haman, and that is the</v>

02:12:56.720 --> 02:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>one that goes out to all of the provinces, the leaders in</v>

02:12:59.200 --> 02:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the provinces.</v>

02:12:59.840 --> 02:13:02.000
<v Speaker 2>You have the full text of that in the Septuagint.</v>

02:13:02.160 --> 02:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>The Masoretic text just says that it exists, basically, summarizes it instead</v>

02:13:06.000 --> 02:13:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of getting the text of it.</v>

02:13:07.440 --> 02:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And then the final subtraction is Mordecai's interpretation.</v>

02:13:12.480 --> 02:13:16.320
<v Speaker 2>This is sort of the conclusion to the book labeled F, attributing</v>

02:13:16.880 --> 02:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>these things to God, praising God for what he has done, and</v>

02:13:19.920 --> 02:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>again interpreting that dream that we see in A, which is a</v>

02:13:23.760 --> 02:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>vision from God, Mordecai is essentially a very minor prophet in this</v>

02:13:28.560 --> 02:13:34.960
<v Speaker 2>sense. So those are the changes Changes between the actual Word of</v>

02:13:34.960 --> 02:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>God, the Septuagint, the Greek of Esther, and the Masoretic text.</v>

02:13:39.120 --> 02:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>These are the six things that they deleted.</v>

02:13:41.040 --> 02:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>There are other changes as well, of course, because they couldn't help</v>

02:13:44.320 --> 02:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>themselves, they made pervasive little changes to the text, but these are</v>

02:13:47.760 --> 02:13:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the big ones.</v>

02:13:50.560 --> 02:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Like I said before, we are not going to read all of</v>

02:13:54.000 --> 02:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>these in their fullness because it would basically be reading the entire</v>

02:13:56.800 --> 02:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>book of Esther to you.</v>

02:13:58.160 --> 02:14:00.960
<v Speaker 2>We will include links to these, and of course you can find</v>

02:14:00.960 --> 02:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>them in any Bible that includes the full book of Esther, which</v>

02:14:04.240 --> 02:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>would mean any translation of the Septuagint, a number of Roman Catholic</v>

02:14:07.840 --> 02:14:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Bibles, and some others as well, because there are some Protestant Bibles</v>

02:14:12.480 --> 02:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to there's no such thing really as a Roman Catholic versus the</v>

02:14:15.120 --> 02:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Protestant Bible, but there are some Protestant Bibles that do include these</v>

02:14:19.760 --> 02:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>subtractions, these things that should be there.</v>

02:14:23.600 --> 02:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>But as I said, A is basically just his dream, his vision</v>

02:14:27.280 --> 02:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of what is going to come, and it sets up what actually</v>

02:14:31.760 --> 02:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>happens in the book of Esther.</v>

02:14:34.000 --> 02:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>It helps to explain some of these things.</v>

02:14:36.000 --> 02:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>And it also helps to place this firmly within Scripture and under</v>

02:14:40.640 --> 02:14:41.680
<v Speaker 2>God's guidance.</v>

02:14:41.680 --> 02:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>God is the one who is organizing, guiding the action in this</v>

02:14:46.240 --> 02:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>book, just as He is down through the pages of history, and</v>

02:14:49.680 --> 02:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>in all the other books of Scripture.</v>

02:14:51.360 --> 02:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>We just don't have that in the Masoretic text because the rabbis</v>

02:14:55.280 --> 02:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>decided they wanted to make it into something else, and as Woe</v>

02:14:57.920 --> 02:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>said, with great irony, made themselves look worse in the process.</v>

02:15:02.640 --> 02:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>But beginning then with chapter one, I will read a couple of</v>

02:15:06.240 --> 02:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>verses. I'm just going to read them from the Septuagint.</v>

02:15:08.640 --> 02:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to bother with the Masoretic version.</v>

02:15:11.120 --> 02:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I will compare it in my commentary instead.</v>

02:15:14.080 --> 02:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And so starting with verse seventeen.</v>

02:15:16.480 --> 02:15:19.600
<v Speaker 2>In fact he detailed for them the words of the queen and</v>

02:15:19.600 --> 02:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>how she had opposed the king.</v>

02:15:21.520 --> 02:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Therefore as she had opposed King Asweris, so today the rest of</v>

02:15:25.120 --> 02:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the princesses are the rulers of the Persians and the Medes, having</v>

02:15:28.160 --> 02:15:31.440
<v Speaker 2>heard the things that were said by her before the king, will</v>

02:15:31.440 --> 02:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>dare likewise to dishonor their husbands.</v>

02:15:34.720 --> 02:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course this is subsequent to if you're familiar with the book</v>

02:15:37.760 --> 02:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of Esther you'll know immediately, but this is subsequent to the king</v>

02:15:41.760 --> 02:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>during his great feast, his great banquet, requesting that Queen Vashti come</v>

02:15:46.480 --> 02:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and basically present herself before the nobles, and she refuses him, and</v>

02:15:50.720 --> 02:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>she actually denigrates the king.</v>

02:15:52.560 --> 02:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So it goes above and beyond what is contained in the Masoretic.</v>

02:15:56.080 --> 02:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Because the Masoretic basically just says that she snubbed him.</v>

02:15:59.760 --> 02:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Here she actually does things that are completely impermissible.</v>

02:16:03.600 --> 02:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, in this cultural context and almost any cultural context with regard</v>

02:16:07.520 --> 02:16:09.040
<v Speaker 2>to a king.</v>

02:16:09.040 --> 02:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>But the reason for that removal from because she is, of course,</v>

02:16:12.240 --> 02:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>removed as the queen, that's how Esther winds up being the queen.</v>

02:16:15.200 --> 02:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>The reason for the removal isn't given in the Masoretic text.</v>

02:16:18.640 --> 02:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>You just sort of have this summary description of affairs, and then</v>

02:16:22.400 --> 02:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>suddenly the king is looking for a new queen.</v>

02:16:25.280 --> 02:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>In the Septuagint, it gives us the reason that Vashti is removed</v>

02:16:29.120 --> 02:16:31.520
<v Speaker 2>because she snubs and insults the king.</v>

02:16:31.520 --> 02:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>She's basically inviting this.</v>

02:16:33.280 --> 02:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>It's essentially treason, and in some ancient cultures it would in fact</v>

02:16:36.320 --> 02:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>be treason.</v>

02:16:38.560 --> 02:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>The concern here in the Septuagint, the way that this is worded,</v>

02:16:43.040 --> 02:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is it primarily about rulers and their wives, because the queen will</v>

02:16:47.040 --> 02:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>be seen as an example for other wives to rebel?</v>

02:16:50.240 --> 02:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>The Masoretic Text changes this and makes it so that it's with</v>

02:16:54.240 --> 02:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>regard to all women and their husbands.</v>

02:16:56.880 --> 02:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>For the queen's behavior will be made known to all women, causing</v>

02:17:00.320 --> 02:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>them to look at their husbands with contempt is how that's worded</v>

02:17:03.360 --> 02:17:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in the rabbinic text.</v>

02:17:05.200 --> 02:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Now notably this is of course expanded later in the same chapter</v>

02:17:08.720 --> 02:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in verse twenty, because in the Septuagint it says all the women</v>

02:17:11.920 --> 02:17:13.120
<v Speaker 2>will show honor to their men.</v>

02:17:13.120 --> 02:17:15.440
<v Speaker 2>So there is that concern there as well.</v>

02:17:15.440 --> 02:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>But this is just another case where the rabbis have made a</v>

02:17:18.880 --> 02:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>tweak to the text, in addition to all those subtractions we already</v>

02:17:21.840 --> 02:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>mentioned.</v>

02:17:24.800 --> 02:17:24.960
So

02:17:25.120 --> 02:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>for me, subtraction A is really a big deal because it completely</v>

02:17:29.040 --> 02:17:33.200
<v Speaker 3>frames in a Christian way what book we're dealing with here.</v>

02:17:33.440 --> 02:17:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh the book opens with a dream of Mardecaus or Mordecai in</v>

02:17:38.000 --> 02:17:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the second year of the king.</v>

02:17:39.680 --> 02:17:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say Artaxerxes.</v>

02:17:41.440 --> 02:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I'm gonna say Artaxerxes because I can't pronounce the other one,</v>

02:17:44.560 --> 02:17:47.440
<v Speaker 3>even though it's like it's important because there is actually a king</v>

02:17:47.440 --> 02:17:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Artaxerxes and we're not going to get into the historical context of</v>

02:17:53.040 --> 02:17:57.680
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Xerxes or Artaxerxes, because it sort of changes what else</v>

02:17:57.680 --> 02:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>is going on in the world when this specifically is happening.</v>

02:18:00.640 --> 02:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>But it is material.</v>

02:18:02.080 --> 02:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>That's like you said, this could be a six-hour episode by itself.</v>

02:18:05.760 --> 02:18:10.800
<v Speaker 3>The dream that Mardecaeus has includes two great dragons emerging and their</v>

02:18:10.800 --> 02:18:14.960
<v Speaker 3>cries summoning nations for battle against the nation of righteousness.</v>

02:18:15.360 --> 02:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>So this nation cries out to God and is saved by a</v>

02:18:18.800 --> 02:18:21.680
<v Speaker 3>small spring that becomes a great river.</v>

02:18:21.680 --> 02:18:25.200
<v Speaker 3>The subtraction here also places Mardecaus in the king's court from the</v>

02:18:25.200 --> 02:18:28.320
<v Speaker 3>beginning and has him uncover a plot against the king by the</v>

02:18:28.320 --> 02:18:31.120
<v Speaker 3>two eunuchs before Esther becomes queen.</v>

02:18:31.120 --> 02:18:35.200
<v Speaker 3>This is crucial because this is part of Amon's motive against the</v>

02:18:35.200 --> 02:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Jews. When you look at the rabbinic text later on, when Amon</v>

02:18:38.880 --> 02:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>comes after them, he seems to just be really mean and spiteful</v>

02:18:41.840 --> 02:18:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and he wants to kill them, but there's not a clear motive,</v>

02:18:45.360 --> 02:18:47.680
<v Speaker 3>apart from him just being terrible.</v>

02:18:47.680 --> 02:18:53.760
<v Speaker 3>What is made clear by the subtraction A is the Mordecaius interrupted</v>

02:18:53.760 --> 02:18:58.400
<v Speaker 3>by God's vision, a plot that Amon had against Arta Xerxes.</v>

02:18:58.400 --> 02:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>So Corey said, like there's a lot of political intrigue here, but</v>

02:19:01.600 --> 02:19:03.280
<v Speaker 3>it's not the main story.</v>

02:19:03.280 --> 02:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>It's the framework.</v>

02:19:04.800 --> 02:19:09.440
<v Speaker 3>And the crucial thing about subtraction A is that with this vision</v>

02:19:09.680 --> 02:19:13.360
<v Speaker 3>in these events, it reframes the entire story as being part of</v>

02:19:13.360 --> 02:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>a fulfillment of divine prophecy, which is incidentally where it ends up.</v>

02:19:17.520 --> 02:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>The book The book ends with a subtraction of Mardecaus' prayer describing</v>

02:19:23.840 --> 02:19:24.880
<v Speaker 3>what happened.</v>

02:19:24.880 --> 02:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Once we know what has happened, it bookends perfectly that God was</v>

02:19:28.800 --> 02:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>in control the whole time.</v>

02:19:30.160 --> 02:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>So we go from a book where God is not mentioned once,</v>

02:19:33.040 --> 02:19:38.880
<v Speaker 3>where there's not a single prayer, to God's direct intervention, incidentally in</v>

02:19:39.040 --> 02:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>what we're told as a pagan kingdom.</v>

02:19:41.040 --> 02:19:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Arta Xerxes undoubtedly had idolatry and all sorts of things going on,</v>

02:19:45.280 --> 02:19:49.840
<v Speaker 3>just as incidentally King Josiah did when he was a godly king.</v>

02:19:49.840 --> 02:19:54.720
<v Speaker 3>That sort of syncretism and polytheism is not uncommon.</v>

02:19:54.720 --> 02:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>This doesn't justify me.</v>

02:19:56.000 --> 02:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not by any stretch saying it's okay to be a polytheist.</v>

02:19:59.760 --> 02:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Anyone who doesn't hate me knows that.</v>

02:20:02.000 --> 02:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>But when we look at the actual text of Esther, what we</v>

02:20:06.080 --> 02:20:08.960
<v Speaker 3>find is that our deserts he says a whole bunch of stuff</v>

02:20:08.960 --> 02:20:09.680
<v Speaker 3>that's Christian.</v>

02:20:10.400 --> 02:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Now I don't know if that means he's in heaven, but in</v>

02:20:14.320 --> 02:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>this moment in this story in contact with God's people, and these</v>

02:20:18.480 --> 02:20:21.520
<v Speaker 3>were a called Jews at this time, the word that's used in</v>

02:20:21.520 --> 02:20:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the Greek text calls them Jews.</v>

02:20:23.600 --> 02:20:25.520
<v Speaker 3>They were godly people.</v>

02:20:25.520 --> 02:20:26.640
<v Speaker 3>They look good.</v>

02:20:26.640 --> 02:20:28.080
<v Speaker 3>They were blameless.</v>

02:20:28.080 --> 02:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>We as Christians have to love and embrace that.</v>

02:20:30.800 --> 02:20:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that it's totally gutted is I mean it's darkly</v>

02:20:33.760 --> 02:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>ironic, and it's evil because they're messing with scripture.</v>

02:20:36.800 --> 02:20:41.360
<v Speaker 3>But when you're dealing with these subjects where they're accusations of racism</v>

02:20:41.360 --> 02:20:44.320
<v Speaker 3>and all this stuff, well, let's just let God talk.</v>

02:20:44.320 --> 02:20:46.880
<v Speaker 3>If God says something good about some people, it's true.</v>

02:20:46.880 --> 02:20:48.800
<v Speaker 3>If he says something bad, it's true.</v>

02:20:48.800 --> 02:20:53.200
<v Speaker 3>In this case, from the very beginning, God is in control, protecting</v>

02:20:53.200 --> 02:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>his people while also working with whom we're told are pagans, as</v>

02:20:58.080 --> 02:21:01.120
<v Speaker 3>we're you know told Job should have been a pagan, his friends</v>

02:21:01.040 --> 02:21:03.440
<v Speaker 3>should have been pagans, except somehow they knew God.</v>

02:21:03.440 --> 02:21:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, turns out that they knew God because they spoke to</v>

02:21:06.160 --> 02:21:07.120
him.

02:21:07.680 --> 02:21:11.360
<v Speaker 2>It's worth making a minor note here.</v>

02:21:11.360 --> 02:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>The word that is used in the Greek is the one that</v>

02:21:14.000 --> 02:21:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we've of course been using all along for Judean, it can rightly</v>

02:21:18.320 --> 02:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>be translated Jew as well, as we went over in the episode</v>

02:21:20.880 --> 02:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>on that specific issue.</v>

02:21:22.800 --> 02:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>But of course, part of the reason for this is because of</v>

02:21:25.840 --> 02:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the timeline and where we're dealing with expulsions and dispersions of the</v>

02:21:30.320 --> 02:21:32.320
<v Speaker 2>northern kingdom and the southern kingdom.</v>

02:21:32.320 --> 02:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>And so of course here we're dealing with those who were taken</v>

02:21:35.680 --> 02:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>from the southern kingdom of Judah.</v>

02:21:38.080 --> 02:21:40.800
<v Speaker 2>That's why they're present in this court.</v>

02:21:40.800 --> 02:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Because they've been expelled from the land because of the wickedness of</v>

02:21:43.920 --> 02:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>their forefathers.</v>

02:21:45.600 --> 02:21:50.640
<v Speaker 2>The next example, then, of some changes here, I'll skip over two</v>

02:21:50.880 --> 02:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>five because that's the one that essentially highlights the difference here between</v>

02:21:54.560 --> 02:21:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the ESV and others which always translate this as Jew and the</v>

02:21:58.400 --> 02:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>literal word in the Greek which perhaps could more properly be Judean.</v>

02:22:03.600 --> 02:22:07.920
<v Speaker 2>But moving on to verse seven of still chapter two.</v>

02:22:07.920 --> 02:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>And he had a foster child, the daughter of Abbail, the brother</v>

02:22:11.280 --> 02:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of his father, and her name was Esther.</v>

02:22:13.600 --> 02:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Now when her parents died he raised her for himself as a</v>

02:22:16.720 --> 02:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>wife, and the maiden was beautiful.</v>

02:22:19.680 --> 02:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>This one's perhaps somewhat of an odd change the rabbis decided to</v>

02:22:23.840 --> 02:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>make, but the fact that Esther is being raised by Mordecai to</v>

02:22:27.920 --> 02:22:33.760
<v Speaker 2>be his wife is simply dropped from the rabbinic text Which isn't</v>

02:22:33.680 --> 02:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>necessarily a major change, but it certainly is a change in the</v>

02:22:36.960 --> 02:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>nuance and the nature of the story.</v>

02:22:39.600 --> 02:22:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Because Mordecai, who is raising Esther to be his future wife, gives</v>

02:22:45.360 --> 02:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>her up to the king to be his wife.</v>

02:22:48.320 --> 02:22:50.160
<v Speaker 2>That changes the story to some degree.</v>

02:22:50.160 --> 02:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Again, not a major change, but it is a change the rabbis</v>

02:22:54.000 --> 02:22:54.640
<v Speaker 2>decided to make.</v>

02:22:54.640 --> 02:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And as we said earlier in the episode, just because something is</v>

02:22:58.320 --> 02:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>not a major change, or doesn't seem like a major change, doesn't</v>

02:23:02.480 --> 02:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>mean that it is something we can just accept.</v>

02:23:05.520 --> 02:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>The next example is verse 20 from still in chapter 2.</v>

02:23:09.680 --> 02:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>This is a great example, another great example of the Jews, the</v>

02:23:13.840 --> 02:23:17.440
<v Speaker 2>rabbis simply removing God from the book of Esther.</v>

02:23:17.440 --> 02:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>And so I will read first from the rabbinic text in this</v>

02:23:21.440 --> 02:23:23.760
<v Speaker 2>case, and then second from the Septuagint.</v>

02:23:23.760 --> 02:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Esther had not made known her kindred or her people as Mordecai</v>

02:23:27.520 --> 02:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>had commanded her, for Esther obeyed Mordecai just as when she was</v>

02:23:31.280 --> 02:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>brought up by him.</v>

02:23:32.560 --> 02:23:36.640
<v Speaker 2>And now from the Septuagint, and Esther had not revealed her country,</v>

02:23:36.640 --> 02:23:39.840
<v Speaker 2>for Mordecai had commanded her to fear God and to keep his</v>

02:23:39.920 --> 02:23:43.840
<v Speaker 2>commandments, as when she was with him, and Esther did not change</v>

02:23:43.840 --> 02:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>her way of life.</v>

02:23:46.800 --> 02:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Esther and Mordecai are both shown here to be righteous, to be</v>

02:23:51.600 --> 02:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>pious. They fear God and keep his commandments.</v>

02:23:55.280 --> 02:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Mordecai teaches her to do that, she continues to do that despite</v>

02:23:59.120 --> 02:24:01.840
<v Speaker 2>now being in the king's harem.</v>

02:24:01.840 --> 02:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>That's simply removed.</v>

02:24:03.280 --> 02:24:07.920
<v Speaker 2>The rabbis just removed the fact that both of these key players</v>

02:24:07.920 --> 02:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>in this story are faithful.</v>

02:24:10.000 --> 02:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>They're both Christians.</v>

02:24:11.760 --> 02:24:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those cases where the rabbis made themselves look</v>

02:24:15.440 --> 02:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>worse, made the Jews look worse</v>

02:24:17.680 --> 02:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>by removing this, because ultimately their goal wasn't necessarily to make the</v>

02:24:22.560 --> 02:24:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Jews look good.</v>

02:24:24.560 --> 02:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>They were doing something fundamentally different with this book.</v>

02:24:27.680 --> 02:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Again, part of it is they just wanted to make this into</v>

02:24:30.480 --> 02:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a revenge fantasy.</v>

02:24:32.320 --> 02:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>The Jews get to destroy those who don't like them.</v>

02:24:35.280 --> 02:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Which you may have noticed.</v>

02:24:36.960 --> 02:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that they removed is there's some irony here,</v>

02:24:40.800 --> 02:24:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of course, because of the way that the characters work in this</v>

02:24:43.200 --> 02:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>particular story, but they remove the reason that Haman hates them.</v>

02:24:49.040 --> 02:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>You may be thinking of a Russian proverb right now.</v>

02:24:53.040 --> 02:24:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't even Don't even need to say it, and if you</v>

02:24:55.120 --> 02:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it is, you can go and look it up</v>

02:24:56.720 --> 02:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>a little Easter egg hunt for some of you, but that's exactly</v>

02:25:00.240 --> 02:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>what's happening here.</v>

02:25:01.520 --> 02:25:04.640
<v Speaker 2>The Jews have removed the reason this man does not like them.</v>

02:25:04.640 --> 02:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Now it happens to be in this case, he hates them for</v>

02:25:07.440 --> 02:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a reason that is a bad reason.</v>

02:25:10.560 --> 02:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>But they did the same thing that they do in so many</v>

02:25:12.960 --> 02:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>other cases.</v>

02:25:13.600 --> 02:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's almost as if they can't help themselves.</v>

02:25:15.840 --> 02:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>They are compelled to do it.</v>

02:25:18.080 --> 02:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that in this case, it makes them look worse.</v>

02:25:22.000 --> 02:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Because the reason that he hated them was because Mordecai had done</v>

02:25:26.320 --> 02:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>something good.</v>

02:25:28.240 --> 02:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Mordecai had been faithful to his king.</v>

02:25:31.040 --> 02:25:35.360
<v Speaker 2>He had actually been a faithful advisor, a faithful member of the</v>

02:25:35.360 --> 02:25:36.560
<v Speaker 2>king's court.</v>

02:25:36.560 --> 02:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>They still removed that in order to make it seem like Haman</v>

02:25:40.800 --> 02:25:44.960
<v Speaker 2>just hated them because they were Judeans, because they were Israelites, and</v>

02:25:44.960 --> 02:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>so he wanted to destroy them because of that.</v>

02:25:47.520 --> 02:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And of course we all recognize the reason they would want to</v>

02:25:50.160 --> 02:25:51.440
<v Speaker 2>make that edit.</v>

02:25:51.440 --> 02:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Because then they can say look at this, all these non Jews</v>

02:25:54.320 --> 02:25:57.680
<v Speaker 2>have always hated us and wanted to destroy us simply because we're</v>

02:25:57.680 --> 02:26:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Jews. In this case, if they just left in the reason, everyone</v>

02:26:02.160 --> 02:26:04.400
<v Speaker 2>would say, yeah, of course, that's that's a bad thing they want</v>

02:26:04.400 --> 02:26:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to destroy you.</v>

02:26:05.440 --> 02:26:10.160
<v Speaker 2>But it would be because they were Christian, because they were faithful,</v>

02:26:10.160 --> 02:26:13.360
<v Speaker 2>not because they were Jews.</v>

02:26:13.360 --> 02:26:17.440
<v Speaker 3>And crucially, because God gave a vision to Mardecaeus in order to</v>

02:26:17.440 --> 02:26:19.040
<v Speaker 3>protect Artaxerxes.</v>

02:26:19.040 --> 02:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Remember, this was a coup against Artaxerxes that was deleted from the</v>

02:26:22.800 --> 02:26:28.880
<v Speaker 3>beginning. God protected this pagan king through Mardecaus.</v>

02:26:28.880 --> 02:26:30.960
<v Speaker 3>That's, I think, the real reason.</v>

02:26:30.960 --> 02:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't simply that he was doing something good and godly, is</v>

02:26:34.320 --> 02:26:36.880
<v Speaker 3>that God was intervening in this other kingdom.</v>

02:26:36.880 --> 02:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>God intervenes in the kingdoms of the world.</v>

02:26:40.480 --> 02:26:43.120
<v Speaker 3>They're not always going to be the ones that we think of</v>

02:26:43.120 --> 02:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>as being believers.</v>

02:26:44.480 --> 02:26:48.960
<v Speaker 3>And for whatever reason, we don't have to introspect God's reasons to</v>

02:26:48.960 --> 02:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>believe the fact that heath said to Mardecaius, here's a vision, you're</v>

02:26:53.760 --> 02:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>going to protect this king for his purposes, for God's purposes.</v>

02:26:57.520 --> 02:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That was too much for them to bear.</v>

02:27:00.000 --> 02:27:06.160
<v Speaker 3>In subtraction B, which is after the rabbinic chapter three, verse thirteen.</v>

02:27:06.160 --> 02:27:09.360
<v Speaker 3>This section provides the full text of the royal edict that Arta</v>

02:27:09.520 --> 02:27:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Xerxes sent out commanding the destruction of the Jews.</v>

02:27:13.120 --> 02:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Now in the Rabbinic text, this letter which was drafted by Amon</v>

02:27:17.280 --> 02:27:22.720
<v Speaker 3>is described, and yet in the Septuagint, the letter is quoted in</v>

02:27:22.720 --> 02:27:25.920
<v Speaker 3>full. We're not going to read the whole thing for time, but</v>

02:27:25.920 --> 02:27:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to read an excerpt from the middle of it because</v>

02:27:28.880 --> 02:27:31.520
<v Speaker 3>it slapped me in the face when I read it, particularly for</v>

02:27:31.520 --> 02:27:33.600
<v Speaker 3>its deletion.</v>

02:27:33.600 --> 02:27:37.120
<v Speaker 3>This was a letter written by Artaxerxes the King, sent out to</v>

02:27:37.120 --> 02:27:40.080
<v Speaker 3>all hundred twenty seven satraps and whatever.</v>

02:27:40.080 --> 02:27:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Amon who excels in soundness of judgment among us and has been</v>

02:27:43.360 --> 02:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>manifestly fully well inclined without wavering and with unshaken fidelity, and has</v>

02:27:47.760 --> 02:27:51.280
<v Speaker 3>obtained a second post in the kingdom, informed us that a certain</v>

02:27:51.280 --> 02:27:55.840
<v Speaker 3>ill-disposed people is mixed up with all the tribes throughout the world,</v>

02:27:55.840 --> 02:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>opposed in their law to every other nation, and continually neglecting the</v>

02:28:00.000 --> 02:28:04.320
<v Speaker 3>commands of the king, so that the united government blamelessly administered by</v>

02:28:04.320 --> 02:28:06.800
<v Speaker 3>us is not quietly established.</v>

02:28:06.800 --> 02:28:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Having then conceived that this nation alone of all others is continually</v>

02:28:11.280 --> 02:28:15.200
<v Speaker 3>set in opposition to every man, introducing as a change a foreign</v>

02:28:15.200 --> 02:28:19.040
<v Speaker 3>code of laws in injuriously plotting to accomplish the worst of evils</v>

02:28:19.040 --> 02:28:23.200
<v Speaker 3>against our interests, and against the happy establishment of the monarchy.</v>

02:28:23.360 --> 02:28:26.400
<v Speaker 3>That's right in the middle, but it's a portion that's specifically describing</v>

02:28:26.400 --> 02:28:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the nature and the conduct of the Jews.</v>

02:28:28.880 --> 02:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Now I highlight this for a couple reasons.</v>

02:28:31.760 --> 02:28:34.800
<v Speaker 3>One, at the end of the section that was deleted by the</v>

02:28:35.200 --> 02:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>rabbis, Mardecaus cries out with a loud voice A nation that has</v>

02:28:39.200 --> 02:28:41.840
<v Speaker 3>done no wrong is going to be destroyed.</v>

02:28:41.840 --> 02:28:46.480
<v Speaker 3>So it is scriptural that the accusations of Amon or Haman against</v>

02:28:46.480 --> 02:28:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the Jews were categorically false in this place and time.</v>

02:28:52.080 --> 02:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So isn't it weird that that would be deleted?</v>

02:28:54.240 --> 02:28:57.360
<v Speaker 3>If Marde Caius is telling the truth that a nation that has</v>

02:28:57.360 --> 02:29:00.240
<v Speaker 3>done no wrong is going to be destroyed, well, I mean that's</v>

02:29:00.240 --> 02:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>consistent with the text we were left with.</v>

02:29:03.040 --> 02:29:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So why not leave in all these terrible things that Amon said</v>

02:29:06.240 --> 02:29:10.400
<v Speaker 3>about them that Artaxerxes sent out because he believed what his advisor</v>

02:29:10.400 --> 02:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>said? Well, remember what's said in first Thessalonians two?</v>

02:29:14.880 --> 02:29:18.320
<v Speaker 3>For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen, as they</v>

02:29:18.320 --> 02:29:21.360
<v Speaker 3>did from the Jews who killed both the Lord Jesus Christ and</v>

02:29:21.360 --> 02:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the prophets and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all</v>

02:29:25.200 --> 02:29:29.280
<v Speaker 3>mankind by hindering us from speaking to the nations so that they</v>

02:29:29.280 --> 02:29:30.720
<v Speaker 3>might be saved.</v>

02:29:30.720 --> 02:29:34.000
<v Speaker 3>That's not an exact parallel, but it immediately came to mind.</v>

02:29:34.000 --> 02:29:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Because what Amon describes is what the Jews do almost everywhere.</v>

02:29:38.080 --> 02:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly what they've been doing for the last two thousand years.</v>

02:29:40.800 --> 02:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>In every country they've gone to, Amon's description of them was absolutely</v>

02:29:45.440 --> 02:29:50.320
<v Speaker 3>true. So I think that's a probably the reason that the rabbis</v>

02:29:50.320 --> 02:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>deleted it, even though Mardecaus said we're not guilty of anything, and</v>

02:29:54.880 --> 02:29:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I believe that as a Christian completely, they were not guilty of</v>

02:29:58.080 --> 02:30:00.800
<v Speaker 3>undermining King Artaxerxes.</v>

02:30:00.800 --> 02:30:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Which tells us something also about the kingdom in which they lived.</v>

02:30:05.680 --> 02:30:10.160
<v Speaker 3>If If God was commending them for upholding that nation rather than</v>

02:30:10.160 --> 02:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>subverting it, that tells us something about their hosts.</v>

02:30:13.920 --> 02:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>They weren't quite as awful as we're told they were.</v>

02:30:16.880 --> 02:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>And not as awful.</v>

02:30:18.240 --> 02:30:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Again, I'm not blessing him and saying the entire country is Christian</v>

02:30:20.960 --> 02:30:21.840
<v Speaker 3>at this point.</v>

02:30:21.840 --> 02:30:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm simply saying that if you look at the rabbinic text of</v>

02:30:24.800 --> 02:30:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Esther, you think those were monsters.</v>

02:30:26.560 --> 02:30:29.280
<v Speaker 3>As Artaxerx is a complete jerk.</v>

02:30:29.280 --> 02:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Just murdering everyone.</v>

02:30:30.640 --> 02:30:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Jews had to were all on their own.</v>

02:30:33.120 --> 02:30:38.160
<v Speaker 3>When the reality is that I think what Amon said of them</v>

02:30:38.400 --> 02:30:42.080
<v Speaker 3>was well known, I don't think he was lying, except in this</v>

02:30:42.080 --> 02:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>moment. I think we have every reason to believe, based on the</v>

02:30:45.440 --> 02:30:49.920
<v Speaker 3>entirety of human history, that the description of Amon here that was</v>

02:30:49.920 --> 02:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>deleted is true, except for this one time.</v>

02:30:53.280 --> 02:30:56.320
<v Speaker 3>In this place, they were not doing these things.</v>

02:30:56.320 --> 02:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>And so their murder was in fact murder.</v>

02:30:58.800 --> 02:31:01.280
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't just killing of rebels.</v>

02:31:01.280 --> 02:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>It was unjust killing of God's people who were blameless.</v>

02:31:05.360 --> 02:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>This of all the deletions, I think, probably struck me the most</v>

02:31:08.720 --> 02:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>simply for that.</v>

02:31:10.240 --> 02:31:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the the one time that something terrible is said about them that</v>

02:31:13.840 --> 02:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>isn't true, they couldn't bear to leave it in.</v>

02:31:16.320 --> 02:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Because at any other point in human history, if you read that,</v>

02:31:19.120 --> 02:31:22.640
<v Speaker 3>if it had been read later on, when they deleted, 'cause remember,</v>

02:31:22.640 --> 02:31:25.280
<v Speaker 3>we only have this preserved because it's in the Septuagint.</v>

02:31:25.280 --> 02:31:28.000
<v Speaker 3>The rabbis had to come along later and delete it.</v>

02:31:28.000 --> 02:31:29.600
<v Speaker 3>When would they have deleted it?</v>

02:31:29.600 --> 02:31:32.560
<v Speaker 3>When their people were doing these very things in other nations?</v>

02:31:32.560 --> 02:31:35.760
<v Speaker 3>It would have been a double indictment of them to read Amon's</v>

02:31:35.760 --> 02:31:39.600
<v Speaker 3>words, and not only would it throw into question the god, the</v>

02:31:39.600 --> 02:31:43.600
<v Speaker 3>true god of Esther, but it would be a reminder that yeah,</v>

02:31:43.600 --> 02:31:46.240
<v Speaker 3>these people are up to no good in all times and all</v>

02:31:46.240 --> 02:31:48.160
<v Speaker 3>places. Except for this once.</v>

02:31:48.160 --> 02:31:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Esther's a beautiful book because the Jews were actually doing good things.</v>

02:31:51.760 --> 02:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I agree with Cory, like the word is fraught, but Jews, Judeans,</v>

02:31:55.680 --> 02:31:59.040
<v Speaker 3>these were God's people, they're Israelites, they're part of Israel at this</v>

02:31:59.040 --> 02:32:01.840
<v Speaker 3>point, they're part of the Hebrew lineage.</v>

02:32:01.840 --> 02:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fine to call 'em Jews, particularly in this case</v>

02:32:04.640 --> 02:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>where they were in captivity, which was their state for the rest</v>

02:32:09.360 --> 02:32:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of time.</v>

02:32:10.560 --> 02:32:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that if they did something good, we give them credit for</v>

02:32:14.080 --> 02:32:18.560
<v Speaker 3>it, and yet the rabbis deprived us of that opportunity because in</v>

02:32:18.560 --> 02:32:22.640
<v Speaker 3>every other place and time Amon's words were true.</v>

02:32:23.040 --> 02:32:23.840
<v Speaker 3>There is an</v>

02:32:23.840 --> 02:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting linguistic note in the Greek of verse three eight chapter</v>

02:32:30.960 --> 02:32:32.480
<v Speaker 2>three verse eight.</v>

02:32:32.480 --> 02:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>The word that is used there in the Greek that is generally</v>

02:32:35.760 --> 02:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>translated scattered abroad or dispersed something like that, could actually be translated</v>

02:32:41.680 --> 02:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>diasporod, because the word there is diaspiro, which is the source from</v>

02:32:48.160 --> 02:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>which we get diaspora.</v>

02:32:50.880 --> 02:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>It is a description of the punishment the Jews have received for</v>

02:32:55.440 --> 02:32:57.280
<v Speaker 2>their faithlessness.</v>

02:32:57.280 --> 02:33:00.720
<v Speaker 2>The rabbis changed that in their version, and the word that they</v>

02:33:00.720 --> 02:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>use is just scattered or dispersed.</v>

02:33:02.560 --> 02:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>It is not diasporate.</v>

02:33:04.560 --> 02:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>It does not have that full sense that we have retained in</v>

02:33:07.360 --> 02:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the Greek.</v>

02:33:08.560 --> 02:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>It makes some sense why they'd want to change that one.</v>

02:33:12.480 --> 02:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>The next example is just another one of those examples where the</v>

02:33:16.240 --> 02:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>rabbis simply deleted God.</v>

02:33:19.040 --> 02:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>This is chapter four, verse eight, read first from the Rabbinic text.</v>

02:33:24.400 --> 02:33:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Mordecai also gave him a copy of the written decree issued in</v>

02:33:27.680 --> 02:33:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Susa for their destruction, that he might show it to Esther and</v>

02:33:31.520 --> 02:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>explain it to her, and command her to go to the king</v>

02:33:34.320 --> 02:33:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to beg his favour, and plead with him on behalf of her</v>

02:33:37.680 --> 02:33:40.560
<v Speaker 2>people. And now from the Septuagint.</v>

02:33:40.560 --> 02:33:42.880
<v Speaker 2>He also gave him the copy of the letter that had been</v>

02:33:42.880 --> 02:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>published in Susa concerning their destruction to show to Esther, and he</v>

02:33:46.720 --> 02:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>told him to command her to go in and entreat the king.</v>

02:33:50.000 --> 02:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Beg him for our people, remember your days of low estate, how</v>

02:33:54.160 --> 02:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you were sustained by my hand because Haman, who is second to</v>

02:33:57.920 --> 02:34:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the king, has spoken against us for death.</v>

02:34:00.400 --> 02:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Call upon the Lord and speak to the king for us, to</v>

02:34:04.000 --> 02:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>deliver us from death.</v>

02:34:06.320 --> 02:34:11.280
<v Speaker 2>The rabbinic text simply deletes God and the Septuagint includes it, in</v>

02:34:11.280 --> 02:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>keeping with the fact that Mordecai is a righteous man, he instructs</v>

02:34:15.520 --> 02:34:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Esther to call upon the Lord, because he believes firmly that the</v>

02:34:19.440 --> 02:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>deliverance for his people if it should come will be from the</v>

02:34:23.200 --> 02:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Lord.</v>

02:34:25.040 --> 02:34:29.600
<v Speaker 3>This section, this subtraction C is one of the most religious sections</v>

02:34:30.160 --> 02:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of what they deleted.</v>

02:34:32.240 --> 02:34:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Marques' prayer, he explains his refusal to bow to Amon.</v>

02:34:36.320 --> 02:34:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It was not out of arrogance, it was because he wouldn't give</v>

02:34:38.960 --> 02:34:42.240
<v Speaker 3>glory to God due to God to any mortal.</v>

02:34:42.240 --> 02:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>So Mardecus prayed for God to remember God's covenant and to save</v>

02:34:46.960 --> 02:34:48.080
<v Speaker 3>his people.</v>

02:34:48.080 --> 02:34:50.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a Christian prayer.</v>

02:34:50.240 --> 02:34:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Remember they were carrying the promise of the Christ.</v>

02:34:53.840 --> 02:34:56.880
<v Speaker 3>That was the point of the bloodline, that was the point of</v>

02:34:56.880 --> 02:35:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the preservation of Scripture, was the promise made to Abraham was going</v>

02:35:00.880 --> 02:35:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to be fulfilled in the future.</v>

02:35:02.800 --> 02:35:06.080
<v Speaker 3>And so Marticas' prayers for the sake of the promise you made</v>

02:35:06.240 --> 02:35:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Abraham, preserve your people now.</v>

02:35:08.400 --> 02:35:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Because if you know, in effect if we're finished off, then it</v>

02:35:11.920 --> 02:35:13.760
<v Speaker 3>means you haven't kept your promise.</v>

02:35:13.760 --> 02:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Do it because you're God.</v>

02:35:16.080 --> 02:35:21.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think Esther's prayer here in Subtraction C dramatically alters her</v>

02:35:21.040 --> 02:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>character. She expresses deep distress at her situation.</v>

02:35:24.880 --> 02:35:29.200
<v Speaker 3>She says she detests the bed of the uncircumcised, and abores the</v>

02:35:29.200 --> 02:35:32.800
<v Speaker 3>sign of her high rank, that is her crown, which she wears</v>

02:35:32.800 --> 02:35:34.480
<v Speaker 3>only when necessary.</v>

02:35:34.480 --> 02:35:37.840
<v Speaker 3>She affirms her adherence to Jewish law, that is not eating at</v>

02:35:37.840 --> 02:35:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Aamon's table, and she pleads with God to give her courage to</v>

02:35:41.120 --> 02:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>save her people.</v>

02:35:42.480 --> 02:35:45.840
<v Speaker 3>And And part of this prayer I think is crucial and probably</v>

02:35:45.840 --> 02:35:48.880
<v Speaker 3>one of the most important reasons why this whole thing was deleted.</v>

02:35:48.880 --> 02:35:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Esther prays in part, and now we have sinned before you and</v>

02:35:53.360 --> 02:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>you have delivered us into the hands of our enemies, because we</v>

02:35:56.640 --> 02:35:58.240
<v Speaker 3>honored their gods.</v>

02:35:58.240 --> 02:36:00.400
<v Speaker 3>You are righteous, O Lord.</v>

02:36:00.400 --> 02:36:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And so what just happened?</v>

02:36:02.000 --> 02:36:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Esther's admitting that they were idolaters.</v>

02:36:04.560 --> 02:36:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Which is why I said earlier there's undoubtedly polytheism going on with</v>

02:36:08.800 --> 02:36:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Artaxerxes lands, then go figure, no surprise at all.</v>

02:36:12.960 --> 02:36:15.120
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that the Jews were participants.</v>

02:36:15.120 --> 02:36:19.920
<v Speaker 3>They were worshiping foreign gods here while they were ruled by Artaxerxes.</v>

02:36:19.920 --> 02:36:22.080
<v Speaker 3>They were adopting the customs of the people there.</v>

02:36:22.080 --> 02:36:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Does this surprise any Christian?</v>

02:36:23.920 --> 02:36:26.640
<v Speaker 3>No. They did this every time they went anywhere.</v>

02:36:26.640 --> 02:36:31.680
<v Speaker 3>They adopted the demon gods of the local lands, they infuriated God,</v>

02:36:31.680 --> 02:36:34.000
<v Speaker 3>which here is why they're in captivity in the first place.</v>

02:36:34.000 --> 02:36:37.120
<v Speaker 3>They wouldn't captivity if they'd still been obeying God.</v>

02:36:37.120 --> 02:36:38.640
<v Speaker 3>That never happened.</v>

02:36:38.640 --> 02:36:44.880
<v Speaker 3>The chastisement, the temporal punishment for the wickedness of apostasy shows up</v>

02:36:44.880 --> 02:36:48.640
<v Speaker 3>physically. They get carted off, they get sent to other lands, and</v>

02:36:48.640 --> 02:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>yet even here God is still looking after them.</v>

02:36:51.360 --> 02:36:54.160
<v Speaker 3>But Esther acknowledges their idolatry.</v>

02:36:54.160 --> 02:36:56.960
<v Speaker 3>She acknowledges they've been worshiping foreign gods.</v>

02:36:56.960 --> 02:36:58.320
<v Speaker 3>They've been worshiping demons.</v>

02:36:58.320 --> 02:37:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The Jews were worshiping demons.</v>

02:37:00.240 --> 02:37:03.040
<v Speaker 3>So I say they look good, I don't mean they look perfect,</v>

02:37:03.040 --> 02:37:04.880
<v Speaker 3>but what's the problem here?</v>

02:37:04.880 --> 02:37:07.200
<v Speaker 3>This makes our Xerxes look bad, doesn't it?</v>

02:37:07.200 --> 02:37:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Like this is what I'm trying to highlight, like who looks good</v>

02:37:09.200 --> 02:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and who looks bad.</v>

02:37:10.480 --> 02:37:13.840
<v Speaker 3>When you change the content, when you change the text of a</v>

02:37:13.840 --> 02:37:17.600
<v Speaker 3>story, what could What conclusions are altered?</v>

02:37:17.600 --> 02:37:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Artaxerxes is overseeing a land that has pagans and has God's people.</v>

02:37:23.760 --> 02:37:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And God's people are saying, yeah, we stopped worshiping you, or we</v>

02:37:27.360 --> 02:37:30.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't exclusively worship you, God, which is effectively the same thing.</v>

02:37:30.960 --> 02:37:37.520
<v Speaker 3>And for that confession to come from Esther shapes the whole thing.</v>

02:37:37.520 --> 02:37:37.760
And

02:37:37.760 --> 02:37:43.520
<v Speaker 2>then subtraction D even doubles down as it were on Esther's faithfulness</v>

02:37:43.520 --> 02:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>in this, because that one starts with Then it happened on the</v>

02:37:47.120 --> 02:37:50.240
<v Speaker 2>third day when she had ceased praying, she took off the garments</v>

02:37:50.240 --> 02:37:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of her service and put on her glorious clothes, and having become</v>

02:37:53.760 --> 02:37:58.560
<v Speaker 2>resplendent, after she had called upon God, the overseer and Saviour of</v>

02:37:58.560 --> 02:38:02.400
<v Speaker 2>all, she took her two devoted slaves, and she leaned upon one,</v>

02:38:02.400 --> 02:38:05.600
<v Speaker 2>as though she were delicate, and the other one followed bearing her</v>

02:38:05.600 --> 02:38:10.880
<v Speaker 2>train. We go from a book that in the rabbinic text doesn't</v>

02:38:10.800 --> 02:38:16.400
<v Speaker 2>even mention God, to a book where we have the words she</v>

02:38:16.640 --> 02:38:22.240
<v Speaker 2>called upon God the overseer and saviour of all.</v>

02:38:22.240 --> 02:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>This is a thoroughly Christian book in the Septuagint, whereas again it</v>

02:38:28.080 --> 02:38:34.000
<v Speaker 2>is just some sort of political revenge fantasy in the Masoretic text.</v>

02:38:34.000 --> 02:38:39.600
<v Speaker 2>You also have a change in sort of if not necessarily the</v>

02:38:39.600 --> 02:38:45.280
<v Speaker 2>nature, then the overall character of the king in this case.</v>

02:38:45.280 --> 02:38:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And I would just recommend that you actually read the entirety of</v>

02:38:49.440 --> 02:38:49.840
<v Speaker 2>this book.</v>

02:38:49.840 --> 02:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Again, it will be linked in the show notes.</v>

02:38:52.160 --> 02:38:55.520
<v Speaker 2>You should read this and notice the difference in how the king</v>

02:38:55.520 --> 02:39:01.120
<v Speaker 2>is portrayed in the actual book versus what the rabbis did to</v>

02:39:01.120 --> 02:39:05.040
<v Speaker 2>his character, and how he is portrayed and even slandered in the</v>

02:39:05.040 --> 02:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Masoretic text.</v>

02:39:08.720 --> 02:39:11.920
<v Speaker 3>There's one crucial detail that we do need to highlight.</v>

02:39:11.920 --> 02:39:15.440
<v Speaker 3>In the rabbinic text, Esther is just standing, she stands in the</v>

02:39:15.440 --> 02:39:18.320
<v Speaker 3>court, she finds favor, and the king extends a scepter.</v>

02:39:18.320 --> 02:39:19.840
<v Speaker 3>It's much shorter.</v>

02:39:19.840 --> 02:39:22.640
<v Speaker 3>What we find in the Septuagint is that when she's accompanied by</v>

02:39:22.640 --> 02:39:25.360
<v Speaker 3>her By her two maids, she's overcome with terror, she sees the</v>

02:39:25.360 --> 02:39:29.200
<v Speaker 3>king and is intimidating royal splendor, and she faints.</v>

02:39:29.200 --> 02:39:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Arta Xerxes is initially enraged, and then this is a quote But</v>

02:39:34.000 --> 02:39:38.160
<v Speaker 3>God changed the spirit of the king to gentleness, and an intense</v>

02:39:38.160 --> 02:39:41.680
<v Speaker 3>feeling he sprang from off his throne and took her into his</v>

02:39:41.680 --> 02:39:44.080
<v Speaker 3>arms until she recovered.</v>

02:39:44.080 --> 02:39:50.240
<v Speaker 3>God caused Artaxerxes' heart to soften in engendered love for his queen</v>

02:39:50.640 --> 02:39:55.280
<v Speaker 3>in the moment when he'd been infuriated at her behavior, fainting, whatever.</v>

02:39:55.280 --> 02:40:00.000
<v Speaker 3>He was angry, she was terrified, and when he saw her swoon,</v>

02:40:00.000 --> 02:40:04.480
<v Speaker 3>he rushed to her, embraced her and basically nursed her back to</v>

02:40:04.480 --> 02:40:07.360
<v Speaker 3>consciousness, to having her wits about her.</v>

02:40:07.360 --> 02:40:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And God moved him to do that.</v>

02:40:10.960 --> 02:40:14.080
<v Speaker 3>What does it say about our Xerxes if God is moving his</v>

02:40:14.080 --> 02:40:16.640
<v Speaker 3>heart to have love for Esther.</v>

02:40:16.640 --> 02:40:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you understand now why these things might be deleted by the</v>

02:40:19.360 --> 02:40:23.840
<v Speaker 3>rabbis? It fundamentally changes the nature of what's going on.</v>

02:40:23.840 --> 02:40:27.920
<v Speaker 3>If God is working to protect Artaxerxes in his kingdom, if God</v>

02:40:27.920 --> 02:40:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is working in his heart,</v>

02:40:30.080 --> 02:40:33.600
<v Speaker 3>that says something about the man and about his kingdom and about</v>

02:40:33.600 --> 02:40:35.520
<v Speaker 3>his nation.</v>

02:40:35.520 --> 02:40:39.520
<v Speaker 3>And just as we continue with the vision at the beginning that</v>

02:40:39.520 --> 02:40:46.640
<v Speaker 3>they deleted, God's divine intervention is direct and explicit throughout this entire</v>

02:40:46.640 --> 02:40:49.040
<v Speaker 3>book.</v>

02:40:49.040 --> 02:40:49.280
The

02:40:49.280 --> 02:40:53.600
<v Speaker 2>next example we have is from chapter seven, this is verse nine,</v>

02:40:53.600 --> 02:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and I will just read that from the Septuagint.</v>

02:40:58.960 --> 02:41:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Then Bugatha, one of the eunuchs of the king, said, Behold, Haman</v>

02:41:03.360 --> 02:41:07.040
<v Speaker 2>prepared a pole for Mordecai, who spoke on behalf of the king,</v>

02:41:07.040 --> 02:41:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and a pole fifty cubits high has been set up at the</v>

02:41:10.080 --> 02:41:14.960
<v Speaker 2>house of Haman, and the king said, Let Haman be crucified upon</v>

02:41:14.960 --> 02:41:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it. This is an interesting note because if you are familiar with</v>

02:41:20.400 --> 02:41:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Esther in the Rabbinic text, you will note there's a pretty significant</v>

02:41:24.080 --> 02:41:26.560
<v Speaker 2>change in verb here.</v>

02:41:26.560 --> 02:41:32.640
<v Speaker 2>The verb that is present in the rabbinic text is hanged.</v>

02:41:32.640 --> 02:41:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Let Haman be hanged on this gallows that he has constructed.</v>

02:41:37.680 --> 02:41:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Here in the Greek it says crucified, and this is in fact</v>

02:41:40.640 --> 02:41:44.320
<v Speaker 2>a punishment that was practiced by these people.</v>

02:41:44.320 --> 02:41:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It very clearly it is the verb crucify, it is literally the</v>

02:41:47.360 --> 02:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>verb for crucify.</v>

02:41:48.400 --> 02:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not an interpretation decision, it's not how we decide to exegete</v>

02:41:52.560 --> 02:41:55.600
<v Speaker 2>this. That is simply what it says.</v>

02:41:55.600 --> 02:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>It is curious that the rabbis would go ahead and remove a</v>

02:42:00.000 --> 02:42:01.760
<v Speaker 2>reference to that.</v>

02:42:01.760 --> 02:42:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, perhaps it's not anything that's explicitly Christological here because you're crucifying</v>

02:42:07.440 --> 02:42:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a wicked man, and the righteous man escapes in this case, which</v>

02:42:10.880 --> 02:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of course is the opposite of what happens in the case of</v>

02:42:13.600 --> 02:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Christ, because the murderer is let free and Christ is crucified, but</v>

02:42:18.880 --> 02:42:23.840
<v Speaker 2>the rabbis still felt compelled to remove this reference to a punishment</v>

02:42:24.400 --> 02:42:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that they knew had taken place, something that they had explicitly called</v>

02:42:30.800 --> 02:42:34.400
<v Speaker 2>for, and then called down the curse of that righteous man's blood</v>

02:42:34.400 --> 02:42:35.680
<v Speaker 2>on their heads.</v>

02:42:35.680 --> 02:42:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Just an interesting grammatical point that they changed this one verb.</v>

02:42:41.840 --> 02:42:48.000
<v Speaker 2>The next subtraction is subtraction E we mentioned is the second decree</v>

02:42:48.000 --> 02:42:50.240
<v Speaker 2>from the king dealing with Haman's wickedness</v>

02:42:51.200 --> 02:42:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and the actions that flowed from that, I'll read the first part</v>

02:42:54.880 --> 02:42:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of that because it contains a key point here.</v>

02:42:58.080 --> 02:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>For when Haman the son of Hamadatha, a Macedonian, who was in</v>

02:43:01.920 --> 02:43:05.920
<v Speaker 2>truth a foreigner to Persian blood, and standing far apart from our</v>

02:43:05.920 --> 02:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>kindness, though having been hospitable to us, obtained the benevolence that we</v>

02:43:10.560 --> 02:43:14.320
<v Speaker 2>hold for every nation to such degree, that he was publicly proclaimed</v>

02:43:14.320 --> 02:43:17.920
<v Speaker 2>as our father, and continuing as the second face from the royal</v>

02:43:17.920 --> 02:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>throne. He was worshipped by all.</v>

02:43:20.400 --> 02:43:23.840
<v Speaker 2>It goes on and so forth and explains his wickedness and his</v>

02:43:23.840 --> 02:43:26.880
<v Speaker 2>subversion and what he was attempting to do.</v>

02:43:26.880 --> 02:43:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And then that he asks with ingenious deceptions of stratagems he asks</v>

02:43:31.360 --> 02:43:35.600
<v Speaker 2>for the destruction of the Jews in order to transfer the dominion</v>

02:43:35.600 --> 02:43:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Persians to the Macedonians.</v>

02:43:39.760 --> 02:43:45.120
<v Speaker 2>This is fundamentally different from what we have in the rabbinic text,</v>

02:43:45.120 --> 02:43:50.800
<v Speaker 2>because in the rabbinic text they call Haman an agagite.</v>

02:43:50.800 --> 02:43:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And you may wonder what on earth is an agagite.</v>

02:43:55.360 --> 02:44:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Agag is one of the kings mentioned in the Old Testament,</v>

02:44:01.120 --> 02:44:04.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the kings that initially the people of Israel failed to</v>

02:44:04.720 --> 02:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>destroy. And then later on, they go ahead and destroy him under</v>

02:44:09.600 --> 02:44:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Saul. It's actually Samuel who kills him, but nonetheless, that's under King</v>

02:44:14.880 --> 02:44:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Saul. Part of the reason that this is relevant is because the</v>

02:44:20.640 --> 02:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Jews still view this today as their conflict.</v>

02:44:25.600 --> 02:44:32.640
<v Speaker 2>They view themselves as attempting to destroy certain Old Testament figures and</v>

02:44:32.640 --> 02:44:39.280
<v Speaker 2>they link those Old Testament figures figures usually to Christendom, usually explicitly</v>

02:44:39.280 --> 02:44:43.360
<v Speaker 2>to the Christian, the white Christian West.</v>

02:44:43.360 --> 02:44:46.720
<v Speaker 2>And this is one of those cases because this is a king</v>

02:44:46.720 --> 02:44:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of those people that they view still today as their enemies.</v>

02:44:50.400 --> 02:44:54.800
<v Speaker 2>And so they changed what is very clearly calling this man a</v>

02:44:54.800 --> 02:44:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Macedonian, which is to say he's a Greek, attempting to transfer the</v>

02:44:58.640 --> 02:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>kingdom of the Persians to the Greeks, which of course later happens</v>

02:45:02.080 --> 02:45:03.920
<v Speaker 2>under Alexander.</v>

02:45:03.920 --> 02:45:06.000
<v Speaker 2>This is before that.</v>

02:45:06.000 --> 02:45:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So it doesn't occur here.</v>

02:45:07.440 --> 02:45:10.240
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to take this kingdom by deception that they will later</v>

02:45:10.240 --> 02:45:11.760
<v Speaker 2>take by force.</v>

02:45:11.760 --> 02:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>They change the geopolitics of this in order to make it into</v>

02:45:16.400 --> 02:45:21.680
<v Speaker 2>their own sort of political diatribe against their enemies.</v>

02:45:21.680 --> 02:45:25.120
<v Speaker 2>And so they change him from a Macedonian to an Agagite.</v>

02:45:25.120 --> 02:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>In order to tie him into these people that they have sort</v>

02:45:29.600 --> 02:45:33.920
<v Speaker 2>of mythologized and turned into their enemies for all time.</v>

02:45:33.920 --> 02:45:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that again Agag and his people are destroyed under</v>

02:45:38.400 --> 02:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>King Saul, Samuel being the one who actually takes the sword and</v>

02:45:41.680 --> 02:45:45.280
<v Speaker 2>kills Agag because he was taken prisoner, instead of being devoted to</v>

02:45:45.280 --> 02:45:48.720
<v Speaker 2>destruction as Saul was commanded by God.</v>

02:45:48.720 --> 02:45:53.040
<v Speaker 2>They still view this as their battle to be waged.</v>

02:45:53.040 --> 02:45:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And in many of their writings, particularly Rabbinic writings, some things in</v>

02:45:56.960 --> 02:46:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the Talmud, they do not believe that their Messiah will appear, and</v>

02:46:02.800 --> 02:46:05.280
<v Speaker 2>they will take possession of the world, because of course that's what</v>

02:46:05.280 --> 02:46:09.600
<v Speaker 2>they view as being the role of the Messiah in their religion.</v>

02:46:09.600 --> 02:46:15.280
<v Speaker 2>They don't believe that will happen until Christendom is destroyed, until Europe</v>

02:46:15.520 --> 02:46:20.160
<v Speaker 2>is destroyed, until basically all of the sons of Japheth are destroyed.</v>

02:46:20.480 --> 02:46:21.920
<v Speaker 2>is why they made this edit.</v>

02:46:21.920 --> 02:46:26.000
<v Speaker 2>That is what they are pushing here, because that is their worldview.</v>

02:46:26.000 --> 02:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>That is their religion.</v>

02:46:29.760 --> 02:46:34.000
<v Speaker 3>And yet again we find that God has directly intervened to preserve</v>

02:46:34.000 --> 02:46:36.240
<v Speaker 3>the Persian kingdom and their rule.</v>

02:46:36.240 --> 02:46:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Artaxerxes rule was preserved first by Mardeus and then by Esther's actions.</v>

02:46:43.360 --> 02:46:48.560
<v Speaker 3>And Amon was executed, was crucified, as punishment for that plotting on</v>

02:46:48.560 --> 02:46:50.160
<v Speaker 3>behalf of Macedonia.</v>

02:46:50.160 --> 02:46:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to read just two more brief snippets from Artaxerxes letter.</v>

02:46:54.800 --> 02:46:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Again, this letter went out to uh all one hundred and twenty</v>

02:46:57.280 --> 02:47:03.760
<v Speaker 3>seven provinces, every corner of Persia received their king, whom they viewed</v>

02:47:03.760 --> 02:47:06.560
<v Speaker 3>as a god, saying this.</v>

02:47:06.560 --> 02:47:09.360
<v Speaker 3>But we find that the Jews who have been consigned to destruction</v>

02:47:09.920 --> 02:47:14.960
<v Speaker 3>by the most abominable of men are not malefactors, but living according</v>

02:47:14.960 --> 02:47:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to the justest laws, and being sons of the living God, the</v>

02:47:19.200 --> 02:47:22.960
<v Speaker 3>most high and mighty, who maintains the kingdom to us as well</v>

02:47:22.960 --> 02:47:27.920
<v Speaker 3>as to our forefathers, in the most excellent order?</v>

02:47:27.920 --> 02:47:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And then he concludes near the end, for in the place of</v>

02:47:31.120 --> 02:47:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the destruction of the chosen race almighty God has granted them this</v>

02:47:34.720 --> 02:47:37.120
<v Speaker 3>time of gladness.</v>

02:47:37.120 --> 02:47:41.360
<v Speaker 3>This is a profoundly Christian confession.</v>

02:47:41.360 --> 02:47:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if our deserts is in heaven, I have no</v>

02:47:43.760 --> 02:47:45.680
<v Speaker 3>idea, and I'm not making that claim.</v>

02:47:45.760 --> 02:47:50.720
<v Speaker 3>'Cause undoubtedly there was other idolatry and wickedness going on, But in</v>

02:47:50.720 --> 02:47:54.560
<v Speaker 3>this moment, his confession, the the Jews are the sons of the</v>

02:47:54.560 --> 02:47:58.080
<v Speaker 3>living God and the most high and mighty, who maintains his kingdom</v>

02:47:58.400 --> 02:48:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and all of his forefathers, he's saying that there is a king</v>

02:48:02.240 --> 02:48:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of kings, and it is not Arta Xerxes.</v>

02:48:04.880 --> 02:48:08.080
<v Speaker 3>He's saying that he has a head in heaven, and he's confessing</v>

02:48:08.080 --> 02:48:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the true God who came to Martius in a vision, and who</v>

02:48:12.800 --> 02:48:15.040
<v Speaker 3>worked through Astra to preserve his kingdom.</v>

02:48:15.040 --> 02:48:17.920
<v Speaker 3>He's giving God the glory, our God.</v>

02:48:17.920 --> 02:48:20.160
<v Speaker 3>You can see why they had to delete this.</v>

02:48:20.160 --> 02:48:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Like I said at the beginning, and I've been saying for a</v>

02:48:22.080 --> 02:48:25.360
<v Speaker 3>while elsewhere, Esther's not remotely the same book.</v>

02:48:25.360 --> 02:48:29.600
<v Speaker 3>You cannot possibly read what's in the Septuagint and have any of</v>

02:48:29.600 --> 02:48:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the same conclusions that you get from the version that you've read</v>

02:48:32.800 --> 02:48:34.240
<v Speaker 3>previously.</v>

02:48:35.440 --> 02:48:35.680
I

02:48:35.680 --> 02:48:40.000
<v Speaker 2>should add to my previous comments about Macedonian versus Agag and</v>

02:48:41.200 --> 02:48:45.520
<v Speaker 2>all of these various things, you've probably heard the Jews speak of</v>

02:48:45.520 --> 02:48:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Amalek. That is what they mean when these things are referenced, because</v>

02:48:51.120 --> 02:48:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Agag was of course a king of the Amalekites.</v>

02:48:53.840 --> 02:48:56.800
<v Speaker 2>So when they speak of Amalek, they're talking about Christendom.</v>

02:48:56.800 --> 02:48:58.160
<v Speaker 2>They're talking about you.</v>

02:48:58.160 --> 02:49:01.440
<v Speaker 2>They're talking about your people, they're talking about Europe.</v>

02:49:01.440 --> 02:49:04.880
<v Speaker 2>And they believe that they are supposed to have perpetual war with</v>

02:49:04.880 --> 02:49:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Amalek until they have destroyed every single person connected to him.</v>

02:49:10.160 --> 02:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Now of course they're entirely wrong about the genealogy because Amalek, of</v>

02:49:14.480 --> 02:49:17.760
<v Speaker 2>course, is not a son of Japheth, but it doesn't matter because</v>

02:49:17.760 --> 02:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>this is their religion, that's what they actually believe.</v>

02:49:21.920 --> 02:49:28.720
<v Speaker 2>The final section, then, the final subtraction, is section F.</v>

02:49:28.720 --> 02:49:33.680
<v Speaker 2>This is sort of the true conclusion to the Book of Esther.</v>

02:49:33.680 --> 02:49:39.440
<v Speaker 2>It is Mordecai explaining what happened and interpreting the dream that he</v>

02:49:39.440 --> 02:49:42.400
<v Speaker 2>had earlier in light of everything that followed from it, the dream,</v>

02:49:42.400 --> 02:49:44.320
<v Speaker 2>of course, being a prophetic vision.</v>

02:49:44.320 --> 02:49:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And so I will simply read the entirety of this particular subtraction.</v>

02:49:49.440 --> 02:49:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And Mordecai said, These things have come from God, for I remembered</v>

02:49:54.320 --> 02:49:58.000
<v Speaker 2>about the dream that I saw concerning these things, for no item</v>

02:49:58.000 --> 02:49:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of them failed.</v>

02:49:59.360 --> 02:50:02.800
<v Speaker 2>There was the small fountain that became a river, and there was</v>

02:50:02.800 --> 02:50:05.280
<v Speaker 2>light, and the sun and much water.</v>

02:50:05.280 --> 02:50:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Esther is the river whom the king married, and he made her</v>

02:50:08.720 --> 02:50:13.040
<v Speaker 2>queen. In the two dragons are I myself in Haman, and the</v>

02:50:13.040 --> 02:50:16.160
<v Speaker 2>nations are those that have been gathered together to destroy the name</v>

02:50:16.160 --> 02:50:17.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Judeans.</v>

02:50:17.600 --> 02:50:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But my nation, this is Israel, the people who cried to God,</v>

02:50:21.520 --> 02:50:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and we were saved, and the Lord saved his people, and the</v>

02:50:25.280 --> 02:50:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Lord rescued us out of all these afflictions, and God performed signs</v>

02:50:29.280 --> 02:50:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and wonders, great things that have not been done among the nations.</v>

02:50:33.040 --> 02:50:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Therefore he made two lots, one for the people of God, and</v>

02:50:36.640 --> 02:50:40.320
<v Speaker 2>one for all the nations, and these two lots came for a</v>

02:50:40.320 --> 02:50:44.160
<v Speaker 2>season and a time, and for a day of judgment before God,</v>

02:50:44.160 --> 02:50:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and for all the nations, and God remembered his people, and justified</v>

02:50:48.560 --> 02:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>his own inheritance, and these days in the month of Adar, the</v>

02:50:52.480 --> 02:50:55.920
<v Speaker 2>fourteenth and the fifteenth of the same month, shall be for them</v>

02:50:55.920 --> 02:51:00.240
<v Speaker 2>days with a gathering and joy and merriment before God, throughout the</v>

02:51:00.240 --> 02:51:04.800
<v Speaker 2>generations, for eternity among his people Israel.</v>

02:51:04.800 --> 02:51:09.520
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth year, when Ptolemaus and Cleopatra were reigning, Dosithius, who</v>

02:51:09.520 --> 02:51:12.960
<v Speaker 2>said he was a priest and a Levite, and Ptolemy his son,</v>

02:51:12.960 --> 02:51:16.880
<v Speaker 2>brought into Egypt the preceding letter concerning Pyrim Theorem, which they had</v>

02:51:16.880 --> 02:51:21.200
<v Speaker 2>affirmed had been translated by Lysimachus, the son of Ptolemaeus, one of</v>

02:51:21.200 --> 02:51:22.800
<v Speaker 2>those in Jerusalem.</v>

02:51:22.800 --> 02:51:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So we also happened to get in this particular book a sort</v>

02:51:25.840 --> 02:51:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of colophon telling us the translation history of this, and how we</v>

02:51:30.000 --> 02:51:33.600
<v Speaker 2>came into possession of the book of Esther.</v>

02:51:34.880 --> 02:51:35.120
So

02:51:35.200 --> 02:51:37.440
<v Speaker 3>just briefly, as I said earlier, we'll have a link.</v>

02:51:37.520 --> 02:51:39.840
<v Speaker 3>The there's a webpage that lays all this stuff out and you</v>

02:51:39.840 --> 02:51:41.440
<v Speaker 3>should just go read for yourself.</v>

02:51:41.360 --> 02:51:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Pick whatever Septuagint translation you want.</v>

02:51:44.400 --> 02:51:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I should actually warn you that this is one of the places</v>

02:51:46.800 --> 02:51:48.960
<v Speaker 3>where Bretton's falls down.</v>

02:51:48.960 --> 02:51:52.160
<v Speaker 3>It is not a faithful translation of the Septuagint.</v>

02:51:52.160 --> 02:51:54.720
<v Speaker 3>It just kind of mashes everything together.</v>

02:51:54.720 --> 02:51:57.920
<v Speaker 3>This is true, I think, more so in Job than in Aster,</v>

02:51:57.920 --> 02:52:00.720
<v Speaker 3>but you have to keep continuously checking it.</v>

02:52:00.880 --> 02:52:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Lexum may be better in some regard there, but as we said</v>

02:52:04.320 --> 02:52:08.240
<v Speaker 3>earlier, there's no full solution to I want to read this eptuagint</v>

02:52:08.240 --> 02:52:10.160
<v Speaker 3>in English because it doesn't exist yet.</v>

02:52:10.560 --> 02:52:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Every single option you can put forward has serious deficiencies.</v>

02:52:15.200 --> 02:52:16.640
<v Speaker 3>It's worth trying.</v>

02:52:16.640 --> 02:52:19.200
<v Speaker 3>But just be aware that you're still going to have to muddle</v>

02:52:19.360 --> 02:52:22.400
<v Speaker 3>through and There are going to be things that you're going to</v>

02:52:22.400 --> 02:52:24.480
<v Speaker 3>have to get cleaned up later.</v>

02:52:24.480 --> 02:52:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important just to summarize what has happened in Esther.</v>

02:52:28.800 --> 02:52:33.040
<v Speaker 3>In the rabbinic text, the deliverance comes through the courage of Esther,</v>

02:52:33.040 --> 02:52:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the political maneuvering of Mordecai, there's a series of convenient coincidences.</v>

02:52:38.320 --> 02:52:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Basically the king's insomnia, Haman's ill timed arrival, etc., are the only</v>

02:52:43.440 --> 02:52:45.120
<v Speaker 3>reason that everything worked out.</v>

02:52:45.120 --> 02:52:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Whereas in the Septuagint, God's a primary actor.</v>

02:52:48.320 --> 02:52:52.720
<v Speaker 3>God sends Mardius a prophetic dream, God changes the king's heart, in</v>

02:52:52.720 --> 02:52:54.080
<v Speaker 3>subtraction D.</v>

02:52:54.080 --> 02:52:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Esther and Marticus attribute all the success to God through prayer, in</v>

02:52:58.000 --> 02:52:59.520
<v Speaker 3>subtraction C.</v>

02:52:59.520 --> 02:53:03.520
<v Speaker 3>In the salvation of the Judeans is not a happy accident at</v>

02:53:03.520 --> 02:53:05.360
<v Speaker 3>all. It's a divine act.</v>

02:53:05.360 --> 02:53:11.200
<v Speaker 3>God acted through them to preserve both the Judeans, the Jewish bloodline,</v>

02:53:11.200 --> 02:53:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and it preserved Artaxerxes' kingdom.</v>

02:53:14.960 --> 02:53:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Artaxerxes remained king because God intervened.</v>

02:53:17.920 --> 02:53:22.160
<v Speaker 3>The Macedonians did not overthrow the Persians at this time, because God</v>

02:53:22.160 --> 02:53:23.600
<v Speaker 3>did not permit it.</v>

02:53:23.600 --> 02:53:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Later on he did permit it.</v>

02:53:25.360 --> 02:53:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Now Now, we don't know to what extent Arta Xerxes preserved his</v>

02:53:29.760 --> 02:53:30.800
<v Speaker 3>confession here.</v>

02:53:30.800 --> 02:53:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's any archaeological record for it, so probably not</v>

02:53:34.480 --> 02:53:36.640
<v Speaker 3>a great personal track record for him.</v>

02:53:36.640 --> 02:53:38.720
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, that would be the sort of thing that</v>

02:53:38.720 --> 02:53:40.240
<v Speaker 3>would get deleted.</v>

02:53:40.240 --> 02:53:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there are often cases I'm not making the claim that this</v>

02:53:43.280 --> 02:53:48.880
<v Speaker 3>happened here, but you will find cases where entire portions of a</v>

02:53:48.880 --> 02:53:53.520
<v Speaker 3>dynasty get deleted because they crossed Some future leader.</v>

02:53:53.520 --> 02:53:57.040
<v Speaker 3>So the absence of evidence isn't evidence either way.</v>

02:53:57.040 --> 02:54:00.640
<v Speaker 3>We don't know, and I certainly wouldn't either.</v>

02:54:00.640 --> 02:54:04.720
<v Speaker 3>But Arta Xerxes had a Christian confession at times.</v>

02:54:04.720 --> 02:54:07.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think that when you think back to that verse in</v>

02:54:07.920 --> 02:54:12.960
<v Speaker 3>First Thessalonians 2 that I quoted earlier, God desires all mankind to</v>

02:54:12.960 --> 02:54:18.320
<v Speaker 3>come to him, every nation, not individuals, nations, kings on down.</v>

02:54:18.320 --> 02:54:20.560
<v Speaker 3>There's no such thing as individuals.</v>

02:54:20.560 --> 02:54:23.680
<v Speaker 3>When a king is good, his people are good.</v>

02:54:23.680 --> 02:54:28.160
<v Speaker 3>When Job was king over Edom, Edom was a Christian land.</v>

02:54:28.160 --> 02:54:30.480
<v Speaker 3>They were a land of God fearers.</v>

02:54:30.480 --> 02:54:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that this king who is so blessed by God</v>

02:54:32.720 --> 02:54:34.880
<v Speaker 3>and who was held up as blameless?</v>

02:54:34.880 --> 02:54:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that he had people committing idolatry the way the</v>

02:54:38.160 --> 02:54:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Jews are committing idolatry left and right?</v>

02:54:40.640 --> 02:54:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not.</v>

02:54:42.000 --> 02:54:44.560
<v Speaker 3>God would not have called him blameless as a king because he</v>

02:54:44.560 --> 02:54:45.520
<v Speaker 3>would have been responsible.</v>

02:54:46.160 --> 02:54:49.200
<v Speaker 3>When you have a good ruler, you have good people.</v>

02:54:49.200 --> 02:54:51.360
<v Speaker 3>When you have a good husband, you have a good wife, you</v>

02:54:51.360 --> 02:54:52.800
<v Speaker 3>have good children.</v>

02:54:52.800 --> 02:54:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's imperfect when humans are doing this, but the influence of</v>

02:54:57.760 --> 02:55:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the man who's at the top shapes everything else.</v>

02:55:01.920 --> 02:55:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Every time Israel had a bad ruler, they fell away and God</v>

02:55:07.600 --> 02:55:09.200
<v Speaker 3>crushed them again.</v>

02:55:09.200 --> 02:55:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Repeatedly they were punished, thrown into chains as they have been again</v>

02:55:13.440 --> 02:55:16.160
<v Speaker 3>here in Esther, for punishment.</v>

02:55:16.160 --> 02:55:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Esther confessed that in her prayer, they deserved it 'cause they were</v>

02:55:18.960 --> 02:55:24.960
<v Speaker 3>idolatrous. And Mardecaus cried out to God, remember your covenant with your</v>

02:55:24.960 --> 02:55:30.240
<v Speaker 3>people. Remember the promise you made to Abraham, because we're a part</v>

02:55:30.240 --> 02:55:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of it.</v>

02:55:30.960 --> 02:55:34.480
<v Speaker 3>For his sake, for your sake, keep your promise, and it's gonna</v>

02:55:34.480 --> 02:55:36.560
<v Speaker 3>save us and the process.</v>

02:55:36.560 --> 02:55:40.720
<v Speaker 3>The Christian conduct here is falls to almost everybody except for Amon</v>

02:55:40.800 --> 02:55:44.640
<v Speaker 3>himself. It's a remarkable difference in books.</v>

02:55:44.640 --> 02:55:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And so it's well worth reading.</v>

02:55:46.000 --> 02:55:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Like Hester's a great book.</v>

02:55:47.680 --> 02:55:48.800
<v Speaker 3>I really like it now.</v>

02:55:48.960 --> 02:55:51.920
<v Speaker 3>I never I did not like it at all.</v>

02:55:51.920 --> 02:55:55.520
<v Speaker 3>For the historical reasons I've been told because it just it did</v>

02:55:55.520 --> 02:55:57.840
<v Speaker 3>not have the voice of God in it.</v>

02:55:57.840 --> 02:56:00.880
<v Speaker 3>As we've said before, a lot of guys, random people, I don't</v>

02:56:00.800 --> 02:56:05.120
<v Speaker 3>know them, have said when I started reading the Septuagint, it had</v>

02:56:05.120 --> 02:56:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the same voice as the New Testament, and that is absolutely true.</v>

02:56:08.800 --> 02:56:12.480
<v Speaker 3>God promises that his sheep will recognize his voice, and that's what</v>

02:56:12.480 --> 02:56:14.240
<v Speaker 3>we have here in the Septuagint.</v>

02:56:14.240 --> 02:56:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Certainly what we have here in Aster.</v>

02:56:17.680 --> 02:56:21.680
<v Speaker 2>And so this is the end of our Old Testament section of</v>

02:56:21.680 --> 02:56:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the ongoing Septuagint series.</v>

02:56:24.320 --> 02:56:26.640
<v Speaker 2>We will be doing two, we believe.</v>

02:56:26.960 --> 02:56:29.600
<v Speaker 2>There's always that possibility of a third, but we believe we can</v>

02:56:29.600 --> 02:56:30.640
<v Speaker 2>do it in two.</v>

02:56:30.640 --> 02:56:33.600
<v Speaker 2>We will be doing two episodes in the New Testament and then</v>

02:56:33.600 --> 02:56:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the final episode on where do we go from here?</v>

02:56:37.360 --> 02:56:42.640
<v Speaker 2>But by way of sort of a section conclusion, I want to</v>

02:56:42.640 --> 02:56:46.400
<v Speaker 2>go over a few miscellaneous things that I just happen to have</v>

02:56:46.400 --> 02:56:51.920
<v Speaker 2>noticed, as it were, in my own reading, and then sort of</v>

02:56:51.920 --> 02:56:56.080
<v Speaker 2>close out this section of the Septuagint series.</v>

02:56:56.080 --> 02:56:59.280
<v Speaker 2>But in the book of First Samuel, and it happens to be</v>

02:56:59.280 --> 02:57:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the example because it is the book through which I am reading</v>

02:57:02.160 --> 02:57:05.040
<v Speaker 2>right now for the daily devotions, and I've been looking at the</v>

02:57:05.040 --> 02:57:07.680
<v Speaker 2>footnotes as I've gone along.</v>

02:57:07.680 --> 02:57:11.760
<v Speaker 2>And in chapter 20, which I read recently, one of the footnotes</v>

02:57:11.760 --> 02:57:13.360
<v Speaker 2>stood out to me, footnote six.</v>

02:57:13.360 --> 02:57:17.520
<v Speaker 2>These are going to all be footnotes from the ESV, and I'm</v>

02:57:17.520 --> 02:57:22.320
<v Speaker 2>making a point that Woe made earlier on, but I want you</v>

02:57:22.320 --> 02:57:25.760
<v Speaker 2>to pay close attention to some of these footnotes and something that</v>

02:57:25.760 --> 02:57:27.520
<v Speaker 2>you will hear consistently.</v>

02:57:27.520 --> 02:57:33.120
<v Speaker 2>And so footnote six, which is in chapter twenty, verse starting with</v>

02:57:33.920 --> 02:57:36.080
<v Speaker 2>forty, I'll read forty and forty one.</v>

02:57:36.080 --> 02:57:39.280
<v Speaker 2>And Jonathan gave his weapons to his boy and said to him,</v>

02:57:39.280 --> 02:57:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Go and carry them to the city.</v>

02:57:41.040 --> 02:57:43.600
<v Speaker 2>And as soon as the boy had gone, David rose from beside</v>

02:57:43.600 --> 02:57:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the stone heap and fell on his face to the ground and</v>

02:57:46.080 --> 02:57:48.160
<v Speaker 2>bowed three times.</v>

02:57:48.160 --> 02:57:52.320
<v Speaker 2>When you read that verse, you think that you're reading the Rabbinic</v>

02:57:52.320 --> 02:57:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Text, because supposedly the ESV Old Testament is based on the Rabbinic</v>

02:57:56.320 --> 02:58:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Text. But if you look at Footnote 6, it says Septuagint, Hebrew,</v>

02:58:02.320 --> 02:58:04.640
<v Speaker 2>from beside the south.</v>

02:58:04.640 --> 02:58:08.080
<v Speaker 2>And so if we were to read this in the Hebrew instead</v>

02:58:08.080 --> 02:58:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of in the Greek, it would say, and as soon as the</v>

02:58:10.400 --> 02:58:14.640
<v Speaker 2>boy had gone, David rose from beside the south and fell on</v>

02:58:14.640 --> 02:58:16.320
<v Speaker 2>his face.</v>

02:58:16.320 --> 02:58:20.400
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those instances where they have used the Greek</v>

02:58:20.400 --> 02:58:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to correct the Hebrew, because the Hebrew is incoherent.</v>

02:58:25.280 --> 02:58:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm just going to read straight through just the footnotes, not</v>

02:58:29.280 --> 02:58:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the accompanying verses Footnotes one through six in Samuel chapter twelve.</v>

02:58:35.840 --> 02:58:38.080
<v Speaker 2>one Septuagint.</v>

02:58:38.080 --> 02:58:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew lax testify against me.</v>

02:58:40.640 --> 02:58:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Number two.</v>

02:58:41.520 --> 02:58:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Septuagint. Hebrew lax is witness.</v>

02:58:45.120 --> 02:58:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Number three.</v>

02:58:46.000 --> 02:58:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Septuagint. Hebrew lacks and the Egyptians oppress them.</v>

02:58:50.480 --> 02:58:54.320
<v Speaker 2>four. Septuagent the army of Jabin, King of Hazor.</v>

02:58:54.720 --> 02:58:57.440
<v Speaker 2>five. Septuagent, Syriac.</v>

02:58:57.440 --> 02:59:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew has instead Badan.</v>

02:59:00.400 --> 02:59:02.240
<v Speaker 2>six. Septuagint.</v>

02:59:02.240 --> 02:59:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Hebrew has Fathers.</v>

02:59:04.800 --> 02:59:08.880
<v Speaker 2>In this one chapter, there are five instances.</v>

02:59:08.880 --> 02:59:12.000
<v Speaker 2>In the sixth one they decided not this is not the sixth,</v>

02:59:12.000 --> 02:59:13.840
<v Speaker 2>but in Footnote 4.</v>

02:59:13.840 --> 02:59:17.760
<v Speaker 2>They decided not to include what is in the Septuagint, but in</v>

02:59:17.760 --> 02:59:22.400
<v Speaker 2>each of the other cases, they included the language from the Septuagint</v>

02:59:22.640 --> 02:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>in preference to the Hebrew.</v>

02:59:24.800 --> 02:59:27.840
<v Speaker 2>And so when Woe said earlier in the episode that when you</v>

02:59:27.840 --> 02:59:30.880
<v Speaker 2>read the Old Testament, in many places you are in fact reading</v>

02:59:30.880 --> 02:59:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the Septuagint.</v>

02:59:32.480 --> 02:59:34.000
<v Speaker 2>That's very true.</v>

02:59:34.000 --> 02:59:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Because there are many places where the translators have decided to clarify,</v>

02:59:38.640 --> 02:59:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to add to, to correct the Hebrew Using the Greek.</v>

02:59:44.320 --> 02:59:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I will get back to that in a moment, but I want</v>

02:59:47.280 --> 02:59:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to go over a few footnotes from chapter thirteen, just to sort</v>

02:59:50.560 --> 02:59:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of drive home this point.</v>

02:59:53.200 --> 02:59:58.240
<v Speaker 2>In verse one, chapter thirteen, you have Saul lived for one year</v>

02:59:58.400 --> 03:00:01.280
<v Speaker 2>and then became king, and when he had reigned for two years</v>

03:00:01.280 --> 03:00:04.800
<v Speaker 2>over Israel, Saul chose three thousand men of Israel, and then it</v>

03:00:04.800 --> 03:00:07.760
<v Speaker 2>keeps going on, but there's a footnote there on Israel.</v>

03:00:07.760 --> 03:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>That footnote one says Hebrew Saul was one year old when he</v>

03:00:13.040 --> 03:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>became king, and he reigned two years over Israel.</v>

03:00:17.840 --> 03:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>They use the Septuagint because the Hebrew is simply wrong.</v>

03:00:23.040 --> 03:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Because Saul is, of course, not one year old at this point,</v>

03:00:27.040 --> 03:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and Saul did not become king when he was one year old.</v>

03:00:30.480 --> 03:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Because he was anointed.</v>

03:00:32.720 --> 03:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>when he was already a full grown man.</v>

03:00:36.400 --> 03:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And so this is another case where the Greek has been used</v>

03:00:39.840 --> 03:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>not simply to add to the Hebrew, but to correct an error</v>

03:00:45.200 --> 03:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Hebrew.</v>

03:00:47.520 --> 03:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>And then we have later on in verse fifteen, and Samuel arose</v>

03:00:51.280 --> 03:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and went up from Gilgal.</v>

03:00:53.440 --> 03:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>rest of the people went up after Saul to meet the army.</v>

03:00:56.720 --> 03:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>They went up from Gilgal to Gibeah of Benjamin.</v>

03:00:59.840 --> 03:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Well the footnote says, Septuagint, Hebrew lacks, the rest of the people,</v>

03:01:05.200 --> 03:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>from Gilgal.</v>

03:01:07.040 --> 03:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>We're just missing a bunch of that verse in the Rabbinic text.</v>

03:01:11.120 --> 03:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and they used the Greek to correct it.</v>

03:01:15.040 --> 03:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Footnote four.</v>

03:01:16.400 --> 03:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>This one simply says Septuagint Hebrew ploughshare, because the Hebrew repeats a</v>

03:01:21.600 --> 03:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>word from earlier in the verse, they use the Septuagint to correct</v>

03:01:25.360 --> 03:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>that. And then the final example, Footnote seven.</v>

03:01:29.600 --> 03:01:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Footnote seven, which is to chapter twenty one, simply says The meaning</v>

03:01:34.320 --> 03:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Hebrew verse is uncertain.</v>

03:01:36.800 --> 03:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what it means.</v>

03:01:38.560 --> 03:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>We just use the septuagent to try to fix it.</v>

03:01:43.040 --> 03:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, if you're dealing with a human contract, there is going to</v>

03:01:46.720 --> 03:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>be an official version of that contract.</v>

03:01:50.320 --> 03:01:53.840
<v Speaker 2>The official version is the version that is theoretically read by all</v>

03:01:53.840 --> 03:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>parties. It is then signed by the relevant parties, usually certified in</v>

03:01:58.320 --> 03:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>some way, maybe stamped, maybe you have a notary there.</v>

03:02:02.560 --> 03:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>It is the official version of the document.</v>

03:02:06.000 --> 03:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It is, in fact, the only binding version of the document.</v>

03:02:09.680 --> 03:02:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Now you can make conformed or certified copies, which are simply copies,</v>

03:02:14.080 --> 03:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>exact copies, in the case of certified, of the of the original,</v>

03:02:17.760 --> 03:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>but the original is binding because it is the original.</v>

03:02:20.800 --> 03:02:23.920
<v Speaker 2>It is the agreement of the parties.</v>

03:02:23.920 --> 03:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>We have something similar when it comes to literature, and I will</v>

03:02:28.000 --> 03:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>get to scripture in a minute here, because scripture is a type</v>

03:02:30.240 --> 03:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of literature, but there's a key difference.</v>

03:02:33.600 --> 03:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>If you have fragments of some historical piece of literature, and say</v>

03:02:38.880 --> 03:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>you're missing part of it, you can go to foreign language translations</v>

03:02:43.440 --> 03:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of it in order to fix what is missing.</v>

03:02:46.480 --> 03:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Now is it going to be perfect?</v>

03:02:48.320 --> 03:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Probably not.</v>

03:02:50.400 --> 03:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>But is it going to be good enough for a secular work?</v>

03:02:53.680 --> 03:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The answer is of course it is.</v>

03:02:55.840 --> 03:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Because you are going to be able to restore what was lost,</v>

03:02:58.720 --> 03:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>corrupted, bugs ate it, the ink smeared, whatever it happens to be,</v>

03:03:03.280 --> 03:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>many things happened to documents down through the centuries.</v>

03:03:07.360 --> 03:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that acceptable</v>

03:03:09.520 --> 03:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the Word of God?</v>

03:03:12.560 --> 03:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>The answer is no, because God, of course, says, neither jot nor</v>

03:03:17.040 --> 03:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>tittle. And for those who don't know, a jot and a tittle,</v>

03:03:20.400 --> 03:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>look at the letter I, the line is a jot, the dot</v>

03:03:23.360 --> 03:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>is a tittle.</v>

03:03:24.480 --> 03:03:26.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the English example.</v>

03:03:26.080 --> 03:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Neither jot nor tittle will pass away.</v>

03:03:29.920 --> 03:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The way that we have treated</v>

03:03:32.960 --> 03:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>as the Christian Church, the Old Testament, God's Word, is utterly unacceptable.</v>

03:03:39.680 --> 03:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>We have made this hodgepodge by using the text that the rabbis</v>

03:03:44.720 --> 03:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>gave us and then fixing it with the Greek as best we</v>

03:03:48.320 --> 03:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>can in places where it's broken or incomprehensible or missing, whatever it</v>

03:03:53.440 --> 03:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>happens to be.</v>

03:03:55.040 --> 03:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>But to return to the example of the contract, you can't fix</v>

03:03:59.920 --> 03:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the lesser unless you have the greater.</v>

03:04:03.200 --> 03:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>And you can't fix the greater with the lesser.</v>

03:04:05.280 --> 03:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So for instance, if you have a corrupted copy of something, you</v>

03:04:09.280 --> 03:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>can't use that to fix that which is superior.</v>

03:04:12.880 --> 03:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying more plainly is that we already admit the Greek</v>

03:04:16.960 --> 03:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>is the Word of God.</v>

03:04:18.720 --> 03:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Because if you are using the Greek to correct the Hebrew, you</v>

03:04:23.680 --> 03:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>are saying the Greek is correct.</v>

03:04:26.560 --> 03:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>The Greek is the word of God, because otherwise you couldn't do</v>

03:04:30.400 --> 03:04:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that. If the Hebrew were the word of God, you could not</v>

03:04:34.080 --> 03:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>use the Greek to correct it.</v>

03:04:35.840 --> 03:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>You would have to be content with whatever the Hebrew has.</v>

03:04:39.200 --> 03:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Well we haven't done that.</v>

03:04:40.400 --> 03:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>We've already tacitly admitted that we believe the Greek is superior.</v>

03:04:45.200 --> 03:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>What we're simply saying is we should go ahead and go forward</v>

03:04:48.880 --> 03:04:49.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Greek.</v>

03:04:49.840 --> 03:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>There are other reasons for that, of course, and we'll make the</v>

03:04:52.160 --> 03:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>full conclusion to the argument after the New Testament episodes at the</v>

03:04:55.760 --> 03:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>end of the second one.</v>

03:04:57.200 --> 03:05:01.840
<v Speaker 2>But we can already see here very plainly, we should simply be</v>

03:05:01.840 --> 03:05:04.400
<v Speaker 2>using the Greek, and we're already doing it just in a hand</v>

03:05:04.400 --> 03:05:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Just in a haphazard fashion, instead of in a consistent fashion that</v>

03:05:09.040 --> 03:05:13.920
<v Speaker 2>honors God and properly pays attention to His word and gives it</v>

03:05:13.920 --> 03:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>its rightful place.</v>

03:05:16.080 --> 03:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Instead of simply turning to the Septuagint and using it to plug</v>

03:05:20.640 --> 03:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>holes in the Hebrew, we should just use the Septuagint.</v>

03:05:24.160 --> 03:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>It is the scripture of the ancient church.</v>

03:05:27.760 --> 03:05:33.360
<v Speaker 2>It is God's preserved word It is completely absurd that we have</v>

03:05:33.360 --> 03:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>just accepted this state of affairs.</v>

03:05:35.360 --> 03:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>We've just been fine with the way things have been done.</v>

03:05:37.840 --> 03:05:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Translation committees pick from here and there to plug holes and change</v>

03:05:41.120 --> 03:05:44.240
<v Speaker 2>things and interpret and deal with vague passages.</v>

03:05:44.480 --> 03:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't even accept that with a translation of Shakespeare into French.</v>

03:05:49.440 --> 03:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>And yet we accept it with the Word of God.</v>

03:05:51.440 --> 03:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>It's completely and utterly ridiculous.</v>

03:05:54.960 --> 03:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>It's worth repeating the quote from Eusebius that I quoted earlier.</v>

03:05:58.480 --> 03:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Therefore, we suspect that this was something which the Jews did.</v>

03:06:02.560 --> 03:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Or we could turn to Justin Martyr, who says that the Jews</v>

03:06:05.760 --> 03:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>expunged messianic passages from their text.</v>

03:06:09.200 --> 03:06:13.600
<v Speaker 2>We could heap up examples from the church fathers saying these things.</v>

03:06:13.600 --> 03:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>We have known all along what the Jews did to the text</v>

03:06:17.760 --> 03:06:22.960
<v Speaker 2>of Scripture, and yet we accepted the rabbinic text from their hands.</v>

03:06:22.960 --> 03:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And it's worth highlighting what the Jews actually believe.</v>

03:06:26.640 --> 03:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>We've done this in previous episodes, we've done it in episodes outside</v>

03:06:30.240 --> 03:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>this series, but it is worth repeating because it is vitally important</v>

03:06:34.320 --> 03:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to understanding what has happened and why.</v>

03:06:37.120 --> 03:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>The Jews do not believe in scripture.</v>

03:06:39.680 --> 03:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>That is the fundamental point.</v>

03:06:42.320 --> 03:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>That is why we brought up the saying, what Torah forbids, Talmud</v>

03:06:46.480 --> 03:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>permits. But even the Talmud they reinterpret.</v>

03:06:49.200 --> 03:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>They don't even hold their own interpretation to be binding, and that</v>

03:06:53.360 --> 03:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>is their own interpretation that reverses what scripture says.</v>

03:06:57.200 --> 03:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Because their real religion is their race.</v>

03:07:00.640 --> 03:07:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And when I say their real religion is their race, I mean</v>

03:07:03.920 --> 03:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>that in part as a condemnation of those who would try to</v>

03:07:06.880 --> 03:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>stand up neo-paganism as an alternative for Christians, as an alternative for</v>

03:07:13.200 --> 03:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the white Western world, for Europeans.</v>

03:07:16.720 --> 03:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Because that's a race religion.</v>

03:07:19.200 --> 03:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not quite the same of a race religion as what the</v>

03:07:22.560 --> 03:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Jews have built, but it's still turning into that.</v>

03:07:25.600 --> 03:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>It's completely absurd.</v>

03:07:26.960 --> 03:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>We don't want to be</v>

03:07:28.560 --> 03:07:32.960
<v Speaker 2>what they have become, what they have made themselves over many centuries</v>

03:07:32.960 --> 03:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of extreme wickedness.</v>

03:07:36.960 --> 03:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is</v>

03:07:40.000 --> 03:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>why? Why would the Jews make these edits?</v>

03:07:45.200 --> 03:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I went over one of the reasons earlier in the episode.</v>

03:07:49.520 --> 03:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>In addressing the prophecies about the Christ, their own personal interpretation of</v>

03:07:56.160 --> 03:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>them, they had for a long time held that the Christ would</v>

03:08:00.000 --> 03:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>appear at the end of or during the sixth age, and for</v>

03:08:04.000 --> 03:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>them an age was basically a thousand years.</v>

03:08:06.720 --> 03:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>The problem, of course, is as I highlighted earlier with the genealogies,</v>

03:08:11.280 --> 03:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>if you tabulate those genealogies, well oops, Christ was born in about</v>

03:08:17.040 --> 03:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the year 5500.</v>

03:08:19.040 --> 03:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Exactly when they thought he would be born.</v>

03:08:20.880 --> 03:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Now we could say maybe their interpretation of whatever they were reading</v>

03:08:24.560 --> 03:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>was right, or maybe it's incidentally right, or my personal preference, I</v>

03:08:29.360 --> 03:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>think God was playing a little joke on them.</v>

03:08:32.240 --> 03:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>But they couldn't have that.</v>

03:08:34.000 --> 03:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So they went back in and edited the genealogies, to remove somewhere</v>

03:08:38.880 --> 03:08:42.400
<v Speaker 2>between a thousand and fifteen hundred years, right around there.</v>

03:08:42.400 --> 03:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Because now, in their reckoning, Christ is born in the year four</v>

03:08:46.800 --> 03:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand. Well he can't possibly be the Messiah.</v>

03:08:50.640 --> 03:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>He's not born in the sixth age.</v>

03:08:54.320 --> 03:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, think about that for a minute.</v>

03:08:57.040 --> 03:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>According to the Jewish reckoning, in what age are we currently?</v>

03:09:01.920 --> 03:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>We're in the sixth age.</v>

03:09:04.560 --> 03:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>That is why they are getting so amped up about their plans</v>

03:09:08.880 --> 03:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to build the temple, about their Messiah appearing, which if anyone like</v>

03:09:14.240 --> 03:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>that appears, it is most certainly the Antichrist.</v>

03:09:18.480 --> 03:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But they have changed it so that their interpretations will match the</v>

03:09:23.680 --> 03:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>tabulation and their Messiah should appear pretty much any day now.</v>

03:09:28.480 --> 03:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what they believe.</v>

03:09:29.520 --> 03:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>That's why they made those changes.</v>

03:09:31.600 --> 03:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>It's similar to that reinterpretation of Amalek as Europe and Christendom.</v>

03:09:36.480 --> 03:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Because if you read scripture and simply believe what Scripture says, Amalek</v>

03:09:41.360 --> 03:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't descend from Japheth.</v>

03:09:43.280 --> 03:09:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Europeans descend from Japheth.</v>

03:09:45.680 --> 03:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>We can't be Amalek because we're not related to him.</v>

03:09:49.280 --> 03:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>They are more closely related to Amalek than we are.</v>

03:09:52.800 --> 03:09:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But of course, they've reinterpreted that, because it is only their interpretation</v>

03:09:57.840 --> 03:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of whatever document that serves their racial ends as the Jewish people</v>

03:10:02.560 --> 03:10:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that is their true religion.</v>

03:10:04.560 --> 03:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why they changed Haman from a Macedonian to an</v>

03:10:08.560 --> 03:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Agagite, to make him an Amalekite, to make the narrative in Esther</v>

03:10:13.280 --> 03:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>match their revenge fantasy.</v>

03:10:17.440 --> 03:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier that I would talk about three types of edits</v>

03:10:21.600 --> 03:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that the rabbis made to scripture.</v>

03:10:24.320 --> 03:10:26.480
<v Speaker 2>And so I want to go over those now.</v>

03:10:26.480 --> 03:10:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I think these are probably the three sorts of things you want</v>

03:10:30.080 --> 03:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>to look for if you're reading through and trying to compare.</v>

03:10:33.920 --> 03:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Now I would say, and Woe would also say just read the</v>

03:10:36.960 --> 03:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Septuagint. You don't need to spend a bunch of time going back</v>

03:10:40.000 --> 03:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and forth and comparing one to the other.</v>

03:10:41.680 --> 03:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>If you're so inclined though, here are the three types of changes</v>

03:10:44.800 --> 03:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see.</v>

03:10:45.920 --> 03:10:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And even if you're just familiar with scripture and you're reading the</v>

03:10:49.680 --> 03:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Septuagint, you will still notice these changes because you'll have that knowledge</v>

03:10:54.720 --> 03:10:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Of the rabbinic text, of course, modulo the changes they've made by</v>

03:10:59.200 --> 03:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>importing the Septuagint.</v>

03:11:01.600 --> 03:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>But the three main kinds of changes they've made are a reduction</v>

03:11:06.400 --> 03:11:11.520
<v Speaker 2>in God's role, the concealing or removing of Christ, and the elevation</v>

03:11:11.520 --> 03:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Jews.</v>

03:11:13.120 --> 03:11:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You see all of this in Esther, incidentally, you certainly see that</v>

03:11:17.200 --> 03:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>reduction in God's role in Esther, because God's just completely absent in</v>

03:11:23.120 --> 03:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the rabbi's version of Esther.</v>

03:11:25.200 --> 03:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>He's certainly not in the Septuagint, he's from the beginning to the</v>

03:11:28.000 --> 03:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>end, the alpha and the omega as it were.</v>

03:11:30.960 --> 03:11:33.680
<v Speaker 2>The elevation of the Jews, of course, is also there in Esther</v>

03:11:33.760 --> 03:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>because they turned it into this revenge fantasy that is purely a</v>

03:11:38.320 --> 03:11:42.560
<v Speaker 2>racial matter, God's not really involved, it's just the Jews getting revenge</v>

03:11:42.560 --> 03:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>on people who don't like them for no reason whatsoever.</v>

03:11:45.520 --> 03:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Ironically again, removing the bad reason they weren't liked at this particular</v>

03:11:49.920 --> 03:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>point in history, probably the only time.</v>

03:11:53.120 --> 03:11:55.840
<v Speaker 2>And then concealing or removing Christ.</v>

03:11:55.840 --> 03:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>There are many prophecies, we went over those in an earlier episode,</v>

03:11:59.520 --> 03:12:04.480
<v Speaker 2>but there's one that's perhaps worth going into a little bit more.</v>

03:12:04.480 --> 03:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>It's worth noting that a virgin birth isn't technically impossible.</v>

03:12:09.520 --> 03:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>And so if all you have is that, that's not an impossibility</v>

03:12:13.360 --> 03:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>because technically speaking, a human being being a mammal, mammals can do</v>

03:12:18.240 --> 03:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>this, a woman can give birth to her own clone.</v>

03:12:21.120 --> 03:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>The virgin birth is a miracle because Christ is male.</v>

03:12:26.080 --> 03:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And clone of a woman is in fact not a man, as</v>

03:12:29.120 --> 03:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you might have noticed.</v>

03:12:31.440 --> 03:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>The fundamental baseline takeaway is that they truly are of their father</v>

03:12:36.240 --> 03:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the devil.</v>

03:12:37.440 --> 03:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>He's a liar and a murderer from the beginning, in the words</v>

03:12:40.800 --> 03:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>of Christ.</v>

03:12:41.760 --> 03:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>They have done everything they can to subvert the church all along.</v>

03:12:47.520 --> 03:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Because they hate Christ, they hate his sheep, they hate his church,</v>

03:12:54.160 --> 03:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and they want to do everything they can to destroy it.</v>

03:12:57.200 --> 03:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>That's why they call us Amalek.</v>

03:12:59.200 --> 03:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>That's why they've made these changes.</v>

03:13:01.280 --> 03:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>That's why they're willing to go so far as to edit the</v>

03:13:04.320 --> 03:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Word of God.</v>

03:13:06.240 --> 03:13:09.200
<v Speaker 2>And Christians have known this for centuries.</v>

03:13:09.520 --> 03:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>The early church used the Septuagint.</v>

03:13:12.320 --> 03:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>That was their Bible.</v>

03:13:14.320 --> 03:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>When you read, many of the church fathers, when they quote scripture,</v>

03:13:18.400 --> 03:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>they quote the Septuagint, because the Septuagint is Scripture.</v>

03:13:22.720 --> 03:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what they were reading.</v>

03:13:23.840 --> 03:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>They were reading it in Greek.</v>

03:13:25.760 --> 03:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>We have had the Septuagint all along because God did exactly what</v>

03:13:30.240 --> 03:13:31.440
<v Speaker 2>he promised.</v>

03:13:31.440 --> 03:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Because God has promised he would preserve his word.</v>

03:13:34.640 --> 03:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>As we noted, the Hebrew was entirely lost.</v>

03:13:37.040 --> 03:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>God destroyed it, it's more than lost.</v>

03:13:39.520 --> 03:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>God destroyed Hebrew.</v>

03:13:42.000 --> 03:13:46.080
<v Speaker 2>And not just the Hebrew of Scripture, He destroyed the Hebrew language.</v>

03:13:46.640 --> 03:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>He erased it from the earth.</v>

03:13:48.960 --> 03:13:55.680
<v Speaker 2>They resurrected something, they basically practice necromancy, the linguistic equivalent, revived this</v>

03:13:55.680 --> 03:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>thing and called it Hebrew.</v>

03:13:59.120 --> 03:14:03.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's not scripture, because Scripture is what we've had all along,</v>

03:14:03.920 --> 03:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that God preserved for us as He promised He would, in the</v>

03:14:07.600 --> 03:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Greek, a language that has never been</v>

03:14:10.720 --> 03:14:15.440
<v Speaker 2>lost. Now some of us in the West certainly forgot how to</v>

03:14:15.440 --> 03:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>read and write and understand Greek, but the Greek language was never</v>

03:14:19.680 --> 03:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>lost. We have always had Greek speakers, we have always had the</v>

03:14:24.000 --> 03:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>resources to learn and use the Greek.</v>

03:14:27.840 --> 03:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>We basically just sort of lost them in a wall, like the</v>

03:14:30.800 --> 03:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Israelites did with scripture at one point.</v>

03:14:34.000 --> 03:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>In fact, one of the words in Esther, a word that basically</v>

03:14:37.600 --> 03:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>translates to braggart, traces all the way back to Homeric Greek, is</v>

03:14:42.880 --> 03:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a fundamentally different thing from the degenerate Hebrew language that never rose</v>

03:14:48.080 --> 03:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to the level of a true and full language, and then God</v>

03:14:51.360 --> 03:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>killed it and erased it.</v>

03:14:53.760 --> 03:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that we ever accepted anything from the hands of</v>

03:14:57.680 --> 03:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the rabbis is completely and utterly ridiculous.</v>

03:15:01.040 --> 03:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>All we had to do was be faithful to what God gave</v>

03:15:04.320 --> 03:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to his church, what God preserved for his church, what the early</v>

03:15:08.960 --> 03:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>church used as its foundation.</v>

03:15:11.760 --> 03:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>If we had simply stuck with that, we would have avoided so</v>

03:15:14.880 --> 03:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>very many problems down through the centuries.</v>

03:15:17.840 --> 03:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Now thankfully it has still been preserved, and so all we have</v>

03:15:20.880 --> 03:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to do is the relatively minor work of translating from one European</v>

03:15:24.960 --> 03:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>language to another.</v>

03:15:26.800 --> 03:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Very easy to do.</v>

03:15:28.240 --> 03:15:32.560
<v Speaker 2>There's some differences, of course, even translating from German to French or</v>

03:15:32.560 --> 03:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>French to English.</v>

03:15:33.760 --> 03:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Closely related languages, there's still some differences, some difficulties.</v>

03:15:38.560 --> 03:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's nothing like translating from Hebrew to a proper language.</v>

03:15:43.600 --> 03:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>It's still the same language family.</v>

03:15:46.160 --> 03:15:50.080
<v Speaker 2>It is not that hard for us to translate Greek into English,</v>

03:15:50.080 --> 03:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>or for those men who are so inclined to learn Greek and</v>

03:15:52.480 --> 03:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>read it in the Greek.</v>

03:15:54.000 --> 03:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not that hard to do.</v>

03:15:56.080 --> 03:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>And God preserved it for us, and actually He also preserved us</v>

03:15:59.760 --> 03:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>against ourselves and our own stupidity, which is something that God does</v>

03:16:04.160 --> 03:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>constantly. God has a sort of special care for fools, as has</v>

03:16:09.200 --> 03:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>been said many times in many ways down the millennia.</v>

03:16:12.800 --> 03:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Thankfully, in this case, we are the recipients of that blessing.</v>

03:16:16.720 --> 03:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not we bear the bulk of the blame or we</v>

03:16:19.440 --> 03:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>can assign it to our ancestors hardly matters, because of course children</v>

03:16:23.040 --> 03:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>do suffer for the sins of their fathers.</v>

03:16:26.880 --> 03:16:30.640
<v Speaker 2>In this case, though, we have the great fortune that we have</v>

03:16:30.640 --> 03:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>not actually lost Actually, lost anything except time.</v>

03:16:33.760 --> 03:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Because yes, we have centuries of scholarship unfortunately devoted to the rabbinic</v>

03:16:39.920 --> 03:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>text. That is time that was largely wasted.</v>

03:16:43.600 --> 03:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>If it had been devoted, to the Septuagint, to the study of</v>

03:16:47.600 --> 03:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>God's actual word, we can only imagine the sort of riches we</v>

03:16:50.720 --> 03:16:52.560
<v Speaker 2>would have on hand today.</v>

03:16:52.560 --> 03:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time we have to look at this as</v>

03:16:54.640 --> 03:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity.</v>

03:16:56.080 --> 03:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Because we have the Word of God, we know how to read</v>

03:16:59.200 --> 03:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the Word of God, it's very easy for us to translate the</v>

03:17:02.240 --> 03:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Word of God, and now we get to do centuries of scholarship</v>

03:17:06.480 --> 03:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>on the Word of God in an actually functional language.</v>

03:17:11.680 --> 03:17:14.800
<v Speaker 2>We don't have to make excuse for things that are missing or</v>

03:17:14.800 --> 03:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>for things that are incomprehensible.</v>

03:17:16.800 --> 03:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to have eight thousand footnotes in the text when</v>

03:17:20.080 --> 03:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>we're done saying the wording of this is uncertain, the Hebrew is</v>

03:17:23.680 --> 03:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>unclear.</v>

03:17:25.360 --> 03:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>The Hebrew is uncertain.</v>

03:17:27.760 --> 03:17:29.520
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to have that.</v>

03:17:29.520 --> 03:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Because that is not the case with Greek.</v>

03:17:31.600 --> 03:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Because men can learn and read Greek.</v>

03:17:33.520 --> 03:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>It's still a living language.</v>

03:17:35.040 --> 03:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>If you learn it, granted, learn modern pronunciation, not Erasmian, but if</v>

03:17:39.280 --> 03:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you learn Greek, you could travel and speak to native speakers, because</v>

03:17:44.560 --> 03:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a living language.</v>

03:17:46.000 --> 03:17:48.160
<v Speaker 2>The same is not true of Hebrew, and there are those who</v>

03:17:48.160 --> 03:17:49.200
<v Speaker 2>say, what about modern Hebrew?</v>

03:17:49.200 --> 03:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a fundamentally different language.</v>

03:17:51.040 --> 03:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>It is not the same thing.</v>

03:17:52.560 --> 03:17:55.680
<v Speaker 2>We went over that in a previous episode.</v>

03:17:55.680 --> 03:18:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And so we do not want you to look at this as</v>

03:18:00.640 --> 03:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>some sort of horrible disaster, some sort of incurable wrong.</v>

03:18:05.760 --> 03:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>We don't want you to look at all the Bibles in your</v>

03:18:07.680 --> 03:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>house and think I have to burn these things.</v>

03:18:10.960 --> 03:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Instead we want you to look at this as being proof of</v>

03:18:15.200 --> 03:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>God's care for his church, of being proof that God does follow</v>

03:18:20.080 --> 03:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>through with his promises, that not a single word of his ever</v>

03:18:23.200 --> 03:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>falls to the ground.</v>

03:18:24.560 --> 03:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>He said he would preserve his word and he did despite All</v>

03:18:28.560 --> 03:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of the attacks of the Jews, all of the attacks of Satan,</v>

03:18:32.080 --> 03:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and all of the stupidity of Christians down through the centuries.</v>

03:18:36.480 --> 03:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Despite all of that, despite the odds, we still have the Word</v>

03:18:41.040 --> 03:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of God.</v>

03:18:41.920 --> 03:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>We still have it in its entirety, in an accessible form.</v>

03:18:46.480 --> 03:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>All we have to do is read it, translate it, use it,</v>

03:18:51.840 --> 03:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and stop relying on the wickedness that is the rabbinic text, this</v>

03:18:57.040 --> 03:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>thing that was handed to us by the Christ killers, with the</v>

03:19:01.840 --> 03:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>very obviously explicit goal of subverting the church and destroying the faith.</v>

03:19:08.240 --> 03:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't mean that you can't read your current existing Bible profitably.</v>

03:19:13.520 --> 03:19:17.680
<v Speaker 2>God still preserved a great deal of his word in these texts,</v>

03:19:17.680 --> 03:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>in these versions edited by the rabbis.</v>

03:19:21.680 --> 03:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's sorta similar to what we as Lutherans would say about</v>

03:19:24.960 --> 03:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the sacraments and things like that.</v>

03:19:28.000 --> 03:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>There's the fullness of the feast to be had.</v>

03:19:31.600 --> 03:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>All you have to do is accept it.</v>

03:19:34.960 --> 03:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to settle for stale bread and tepid water.</v>

03:19:39.920 --> 03:19:42.160
<v Speaker 2>God has set out the banquet.</v>

03:19:42.160 --> 03:19:44.640
<v Speaker 2>You should come to the banqueting hall.</v>

03:19:44.640 --> 03:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>In this case, it is the Septuagint, it is the Greek, it</v>

03:19:48.320 --> 03:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>is the Word of God, contrary to and over against the thing</v>

03:19:53.760 --> 03:19:56.880
<v Speaker 2>handed to us by the rabbis.</v>

03:19:56.880 --> 03:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>The Christian Church was founded upon the Word of God.</v>

03:20:00.720 --> 03:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>The Christian Church will always have the Word of God because God</v>

03:20:03.840 --> 03:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>has promised to preserve it.</v>

03:20:05.760 --> 03:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>All we have to do is start using it, instead of leaving</v>

03:20:10.080 --> 03:20:12.880
<v Speaker 2>it in a wall, or in our case, somewhere in the dusty</v>

03:20:13.280 --> 03:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>archives of the Vatican or whatever museum.</v>

03:20:16.640 --> 03:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>We have the Septuagint.</v>

03:20:18.240 --> 03:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It is the Word of God.</v>

03:20:19.520 --> 03:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>It's the one used by Christ and the Apostles, it's the one</v>

03:20:22.480 --> 03:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>used by the Church Fathers, it is the one used by the</v>

03:20:25.040 --> 03:20:28.880
<v Speaker 2>early Church, it is the one we should be using, because it</v>

03:20:28.880 --> 03:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>is the Word of God.</v>