WEBVTT

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It is the 27th of March 2026.</v>

00:00:02.880 --> 00:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I am Corey J.</v>

00:00:03.840 --> 00:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Mahler and this is at any cost.</v>

00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>This is episode 22, a Q<unk>A episode.</v>

00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And before I get into the questions for tonight, I'm just going</v>

00:00:13.440 --> 00:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to do a little bit of housekeeping, just three things really quick.</v>

00:00:17.360 --> 00:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Three questions that are pushed to next week.</v>

00:00:19.760 --> 00:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the housekeeping.</v>

00:00:21.120 --> 00:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The first is about Japan, China, and India and how religion has</v>

00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>played a role in that and either preserving or degenerating those people.</v>

00:00:28.320 --> 00:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So really a question about Shinto versus Confucianism versus Hinduism.</v>

00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And then the second is the connection between Jupiter and related things</v>

00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to that, various pantheons and how they tie into Christianity or corruptions</v>

00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of Christianity.</v>

00:00:43.040 --> 00:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the last one is national socialism and how it is</v>

00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>consonant with Christianity.</v>

00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Because I have of course posted before that national socialism was a</v>

00:00:51.840 --> 00:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>translation of Christianity into politics, and I do believe that, so I</v>

00:00:56.480 --> 00:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>want to treat that at greater length and greater depth, so I'm</v>

00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing that to next week when I have more time to prepare</v>

00:01:01.360 --> 00:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it. I didn't have time this week.</v>

00:01:03.360 --> 00:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But moving on to the questions for this week, and I have</v>

00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>noted the questions that have come in so far in the chat,</v>

00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>so I've added those either for this week or next week, depending</v>

00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not I'll get to them.</v>

00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>The first question, rather timely considering just a few days to go</v>

00:01:20.240 --> 00:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for this.</v>

00:01:21.440 --> 00:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Question one.</v>

00:01:22.720 --> 00:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So this year I noticed in my church's app that we are</v>

00:01:25.600 --> 00:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hosting a Passover Seder service on Palm Sunday.</v>

00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>However, this is not part of the main service.</v>

00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It is an optional event you can go to later in the</v>

00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>evening. It is alarming me because this seems like a very Judaizing</v>

00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>move. It is.</v>

00:01:40.080 --> 00:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>They will be hosting a speaker by the name of Murray Tillis</v>

00:01:43.040 --> 00:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>tiles, I don't know how he pronounces his name.</v>

00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>He is a Jewish Christian, in quotes, that's appropriate, man that runs</v>

00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>an organization called Light of Messiah Ministries, and links to the website.</v>

00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>His whole modus operandi, from what I've read on his site, seems</v>

00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be to bind the conscience of Christians to Jews in Israel.</v>

00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That's expected.</v>

00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>The nation state, of course, he's speaking of, and that he has</v>

00:02:05.680 --> 00:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that here as a parenthetical.</v>

00:02:07.440 --> 00:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps trying to make sure that the boomer glue is still adhesive</v>

00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and emphasizing the Jewishness of Jesus in quotes.</v>

00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Also fighting anti Semitism also in quotes is one of their missions.</v>

00:02:19.040 --> 00:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I am not sure what to do or say about this.</v>

00:02:21.520 --> 00:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>If it were just myself, I would be compelled to raise concerns</v>

00:02:24.640 --> 00:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to the pastors about this.</v>

00:02:26.320 --> 00:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>However, I am a member alongside my parents who are very entrenched</v>

00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>there. Many years I only became a member of the church a</v>

00:02:33.040 --> 00:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>year ago.</v>

00:02:34.080 --> 00:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>My dad has been part of the music ministry for many years,</v>

00:02:36.480 --> 00:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and my mom is very involved in small groups.</v>

00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I do not want to embarrass them or alienate them from their</v>

00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>peers or the pastors by being the person that sounds the alarm.</v>

00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to keep the fifth commandment.</v>

00:02:47.760 --> 00:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I assume he means the the reform numbering, so the fourth commandment</v>

00:02:52.240 --> 00:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who are Lutheran.</v>

00:02:53.920 --> 00:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Honor thy father and thy mother, of course.</v>

00:02:56.080 --> 00:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>My parents, especially my dad, are quite aware of my weariness of</v>

00:02:59.520 --> 00:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jews and my distrust of them as we talk about politics</v>

00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Jews frequently.</v>

00:03:03.440 --> 00:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I am thirty four years old and can look for another church</v>

00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at any time, but I love being there with my family as</v>

00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole.</v>

00:03:10.320 --> 00:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Side note something that also makes my ears perk up is that</v>

00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>my pastor has been increasingly using the pronoun Yahweh to refer to</v>

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>God, and this appears to be a fairly recent phenomenon.</v>

00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I've also never heard any dispensationalism or Zionist teaching coming out of</v>

00:03:25.040 --> 00:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the church are from this pastor, the head pastor.</v>

00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So this sort of Judaizing is kind of taking me by surprise.</v>

00:03:34.080 --> 00:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously going to be an issue that is going to</v>

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>face many and has faced many in the past say ten years</v>

00:03:41.920 --> 00:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>or so.</v>

00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>There is a very real push to try to keep Christians on</v>

00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the reservation as it were, to keep Christians believing that the Jews</v>

00:03:51.840 --> 00:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are chosen in some way they're special and that we have to</v>

00:03:54.400 --> 00:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>support them and blah blah blah.</v>

00:03:57.360 --> 00:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The first point I would make is that anyone who calls himself</v>

00:04:01.760 --> 00:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a Messianic Jew, that's a red flag.</v>

00:04:04.560 --> 00:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is he calling himself a Messianic Jew instead of a Christian?</v>

00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>The handful of Jews after the very early church period, when, you</v>

00:04:14.320 --> 00:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>know, the first century or two, many Jews converted.</v>

00:04:17.280 --> 00:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They did, and then mostly were slaughtered by their brothers for their</v>

00:04:21.440 --> 00:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>trouble. But after that point, any Jew who converted did not call</v>

00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>himself a Messianic Jew.</v>

00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He called himself a Christian, and so And so these Jews who</v>

00:04:32.480 --> 00:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are calling themselves Messianic Jews, all they're doing is hedging their bets.</v>

00:04:35.840 --> 00:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They're doing the same thing that Jews have done down through history.</v>

00:04:38.880 --> 00:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You control the opposition, you play both sides.</v>

00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I would never trust someone who calls himself a messianic Jew.</v>

00:04:44.960 --> 00:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>If he calls himself a Christian, I still have some reservations, and</v>

00:04:48.880 --> 00:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like him to be over in Israel being a Christian, over</v>

00:04:51.360 --> 00:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there instead of here.</v>

00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And that raises other problems as well, but if he's calling himself</v>

00:04:56.480 --> 00:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a messianic Jew instead of a Christian, that is such a major</v>

00:05:00.400 --> 00:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>red flag that absolutely no he should not be speaking at a</v>

00:05:03.760 --> 00:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>church. what gives him some sort of authority or</v>

00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>anything really.</v>

00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>What gives him the teaching ability is it just because he's a</v>

00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Jew? That's what's being implied here.</v>

00:05:17.840 --> 00:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>No, being a Jew does not give you the ability to say</v>

00:05:20.400 --> 00:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>anything about the Christian faith.</v>

00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>If anything it's a handicap and you should say nothing about the</v>

00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Christian faith.</v>

00:05:25.840 --> 00:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:05:27.200 --> 00:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in your case obviously there are some other considerations.</v>

00:05:30.960 --> 00:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>If this is a church where your family has been for some</v>

00:05:34.480 --> 00:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>period of time, in the American context, a lot of times you</v>

00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have someone who's been out of church for generations, so a</v>

00:05:40.960 --> 00:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>long time may just be five, six, ten years, whatever it happens</v>

00:05:44.480 --> 00:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to be.</v>

00:05:45.760 --> 00:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Which is not a trivial amount of time.</v>

00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It is in the grand scheme, but not, you know, for a</v>

00:05:51.280 --> 00:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>human life.</v>

00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>do you go to another church?</v>

00:05:56.160 --> 00:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think is really the core question here.</v>

00:05:58.640 --> 00:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer is if they continue down this path</v>

00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of Judaizing, which is what this is, you correctly recognize that, that's</v>

00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>open Judaizing.</v>

00:06:07.760 --> 00:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>If they continue down the path, you're going to, for the sake</v>

00:06:11.440 --> 00:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of your conscience, have to find a new church.</v>

00:06:14.480 --> 00:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Because this is probably not going to get better.</v>

00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's probably just going to get worse.</v>

00:06:19.520 --> 00:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And you're at the age where your parents are probably old Gen</v>

00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>X instead of boomers.</v>

00:06:27.200 --> 00:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Right around that age, it kind of depends on some various factors.</v>

00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>But so six years different for me, my parents are of course</v>

00:06:33.840 --> 00:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>baby boomers.</v>

00:06:35.840 --> 00:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be an issue for those of us kind</v>

00:06:38.080 --> 00:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of in that age range, because if you want to continue attending</v>

00:06:42.320 --> 00:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>church with your parents, which is a good thing, you should want</v>

00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to the same church as your parents, your siblings, your</v>

00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cousins, you should want to be with family.</v>

00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing.</v>

00:06:51.200 --> 00:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:06:52.400 --> 00:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing is that you're going to a church that</v>

00:06:55.200 --> 00:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually teaching correctly, that is teaching right doctrine, that is administering</v>

00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the sacraments, that is an actual church.</v>

00:07:01.920 --> 00:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is going off the rails.</v>

00:07:04.960 --> 00:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It will probably get worse.</v>

00:07:06.640 --> 00:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just the reality here.</v>

00:07:09.920 --> 00:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If you raise it with the pastor, right, in this case, multiple</v>

00:07:13.760 --> 00:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>pastors, you raise it with a head pastor, whatever it happens to</v>

00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be, he's probably just going to brush you off and then watch</v>

00:07:21.040 --> 00:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you like a hawk.</v>

00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they won't go after you right away or kick you out,</v>

00:07:24.720 --> 00:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to watch you closely, and they may try to</v>

00:07:28.560 --> 00:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>make life difficult for you.</v>

00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That's just the reality of it.</v>

00:07:31.760 --> 00:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you may realize that for better or worse, some men who call</v>

00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves pastors are not in fact Christian.</v>

00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>They really only care about the money, the Jews in Israel.</v>

00:07:45.520 --> 00:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And if this is a man who has before this not been</v>

00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Judaizing and now he's suddenly doing so, I would kinda wonder why?</v>

00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>What changed?</v>

00:07:56.800 --> 00:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Did something in his family change?</v>

00:07:58.880 --> 00:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Did money exchange hands?</v>

00:08:00.400 --> 00:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Why did this happen?</v>

00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can't find out what happened there, but if he's made</v>

00:08:06.800 --> 00:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that sort of change, the odds of him becoming your enemy, if</v>

00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you point this out are very high.</v>

00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So that doesn't mean that you don't bring this up, it doesn't</v>

00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that you don't leave and attend another church.</v>

00:08:18.400 --> 00:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you have to do that.</v>

00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It does mean that you need to keep that in mind there</v>

00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>may be those sorts of consequences.</v>

00:08:25.760 --> 00:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that you discuss these things with your parents.</v>

00:08:29.360 --> 00:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you can discuss this with your parents and get them</v>

00:08:33.520 --> 00:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to recognize that this is contrary to what Christianity actually teaches.</v>

00:08:38.800 --> 00:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's contrary to what all Christians have believed down through the centuries.</v>

00:08:43.280 --> 00:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Then maybe you can get them to leave the church with you</v>

00:08:45.920 --> 00:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can all together go to a new church.</v>

00:08:48.240 --> 00:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That would be a certain Certainly a better outcome than you simply</v>

00:08:51.040 --> 00:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving and going to a new church on your own.</v>

00:08:53.840 --> 00:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:08:55.200 --> 00:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the baseline here, I think, is that this is probably going to</v>

00:08:57.760 --> 00:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get worse, and you're probably going to have to find a new</v>

00:08:59.920 --> 00:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>church. So if you can take your parents with you, that's great.</v>

00:09:04.800 --> 00:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that you necessarily have to confront the pastor on</v>

00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this because the odds that's going to go anywhere beneficial to anyone</v>

00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>are just about zero.</v>

00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>If you feel that you are compelled to do so, if your</v>

00:09:20.160 --> 00:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>conscience is convicted, you feel that you need to go and tell</v>

00:09:22.800 --> 00:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the pastor what he's doing is wrong, this is not Christian, this</v>

00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is sinful, you need to stop, you need to desist Then by</v>

00:09:29.920 --> 00:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>all means obey your conscience.</v>

00:09:31.920 --> 00:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't feel that compulsion to do that, then just</v>

00:09:36.080 --> 00:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>out of an abundance of wisdom, it's probably better not to bother</v>

00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in this case, because the odds of anything, again, anything positive happening.</v>

00:09:43.680 --> 00:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Are basically zero.</v>

00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a pattern that I have seen many times.</v>

00:09:48.080 --> 00:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I've had people DM me.</v>

00:09:49.680 --> 00:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>They've DM Woe and others.</v>

00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>This happens a lot.</v>

00:09:53.440 --> 00:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's where we are today with the churches, and we're sort</v>

00:09:58.640 --> 00:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of in a transitional period because we're still building up new and</v>

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>better churches to replace these old ones.</v>

00:10:05.520 --> 00:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of places you're not going to have one of</v>

00:10:08.080 --> 00:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>those churches readily available to you.</v>

00:10:10.560 --> 00:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And so the boomers still control these churches.</v>

00:10:13.920 --> 00:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They've not quite gotten old enough yet to stop being elders and</v>

00:10:18.640 --> 00:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>pastors. As they retire and live And leave, that presents a real</v>

00:10:22.560 --> 00:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to shift things.</v>

00:10:24.640 --> 00:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So, as I've mentioned before, it's tangentially related.</v>

00:10:28.160 --> 00:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>If you can get on the elder board of your church and</v>

00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>start to shift things away, and then you were probably one of</v>

00:10:33.200 --> 00:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the ones who has a vote to call a new pastor.</v>

00:10:35.760 --> 00:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>By all means do that.</v>

00:10:37.440 --> 00:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That's one way you can return a church to faithfulness, a particular</v>

00:10:41.200 --> 00:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>church body to faithfulness.</v>

00:10:44.080 --> 00:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think here this is a a matter of conscience.</v>

00:10:48.560 --> 00:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>If your conscience is pricked, then perhaps you have to go and</v>

00:10:51.920 --> 00:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>confront that pastor.</v>

00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Nothing positive will come of it, just letting you know that.</v>

00:10:57.040 --> 00:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And if it continues down this path, probably find a new church.</v>

00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully alongside your parents, but if not, then attend the new church</v>

00:11:06.400 --> 00:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully over time you can raise the issue with them.</v>

00:11:09.760 --> 00:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they'll see the light.</v>

00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The next question question two</v>

00:11:19.760 --> 00:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of related to question one actually it seems that most governing</v>

00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>church bodies are a shell of their former selves and deteriorating rapidly.</v>

00:11:28.480 --> 00:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>In today's climate, I am struggling to see how this will be</v>

00:11:31.040 --> 00:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for either party in the long run.</v>

00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So the basic question is should we join a church body?</v>

00:11:37.440 --> 00:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I've answered this one a number of times, but it's always worth</v>

00:11:40.160 --> 00:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>repeating. By and large, the corporate church bodies, and it doesn't matter</v>

00:11:45.440 --> 00:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which one you have in mind here, whether it's the LCMS in</v>

00:11:48.400 --> 00:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Lutheran case, or it's any of the various Presbyterian or Reformed</v>

00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>ones, or it's the Church of England, in our case the Anglicans</v>

00:11:56.640 --> 00:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>over here, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:11:58.880 --> 00:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>They're basically all, if not outright apostate, very close to it.</v>

00:12:03.920 --> 00:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>At the upper echelons, which is to say the leadership.</v>

00:12:07.280 --> 00:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The same thing, of course, is true of the Roman Catholic Church.</v>

00:12:10.160 --> 00:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anyone who's actually a true conservative Christian who likes</v>

00:12:14.880 --> 00:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the current Pope or who liked the previous Pope.</v>

00:12:17.760 --> 00:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>There were a handful who liked the former Hitler youth guy.</v>

00:12:20.800 --> 00:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Unsurprising, he was actually good on some things.</v>

00:12:23.520 --> 00:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:12:25.680 --> 00:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as church bodies go, you're not so much joining the</v>

00:12:30.320 --> 00:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>church body as you are joining the local church.</v>

00:12:33.280 --> 00:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, there are some obvious differences there, some difficulties for those who</v>

00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are Roman Catholic, right?</v>

00:12:40.400 --> 00:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Because when you're joining a Roman Catholic church You're kind of joining</v>

00:12:44.640 --> 00:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Rome. So</v>

00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that's more difficult for them.</v>

00:12:48.880 --> 00:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>For those of us who are Protestant, it's not a problem because</v>

00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're really joining, yes, there are some that are episcopal, and</v>

00:12:55.200 --> 00:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so there's a bishop over your pastor and things like that.</v>

00:12:57.520 --> 00:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That you have a little bit of that over with Protestants in</v>

00:13:00.320 --> 00:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the US, not as much, more over in Europe.</v>

00:13:04.160 --> 00:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>In the Lutheran case, for instance, basically all Lutheran bodies are congregationalist,</v>

00:13:09.120 --> 00:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which just means the local parish owns the building, the land, leases</v>

00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it, whatever it happens to be, and the vice president, who is</v>

00:13:17.680 --> 00:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a bishop, that's all he is, he's just changed his title, doesn't</v>

00:13:20.880 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have that much authority.</v>

00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He can't really tell the pastor you have to do X, Y,</v>

00:13:25.520 --> 00:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and Z.</v>

00:13:26.560 --> 00:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, there are formal ways to deal with disagreements, right?</v>

00:13:32.160 --> 00:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>For instance, if someone is excommunicated, then it can be appealed and</v>

00:13:36.160 --> 00:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>then there can be sort of a dispute between the bishop and</v>

00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the church.</v>

00:13:40.640 --> 00:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, the parish has some level of autonomy.</v>

00:13:45.040 --> 00:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what you want to find is a faithful parish.</v>

00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And once you have found that, then you can help to move</v>

00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that parish to be more faithful, or if necessary, you can push</v>

00:13:57.840 --> 00:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for leaving the national body.</v>

00:14:00.160 --> 00:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Which is perfectly fine, because then you can join a faithful national</v>

00:14:03.520 --> 00:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>body at some point in the future.</v>

00:14:05.920 --> 00:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I've said before, for those who ask me, which Lutheran church</v>

00:14:09.680 --> 00:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>should I attend I'm in X area?</v>

00:14:13.040 --> 00:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to check because Because some of them will</v>

00:14:16.960 --> 00:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>be faithful and some of them will have a pastor who's just</v>

00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a company man who's going to follow whatever synod tells him to</v>

00:14:23.040 --> 00:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>do. And that guy will stab you in the back.</v>

00:14:26.560 --> 00:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't mean that there are no good churches.</v>

00:14:29.520 --> 00:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It just means you can't look at the sign and know by</v>

00:14:34.080 --> 00:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what denomination or tradition the sign has on it, whether it's a</v>

00:14:37.600 --> 00:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>good church or not.</v>

00:14:38.720 --> 00:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Because these days, it may mean very little.</v>

00:14:41.680 --> 00:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So is it worth joining a church body?</v>

00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, because there are still good churches, and you should not forsake</v>

00:14:47.760 --> 00:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the gathering together of the saints.</v>

00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Starting up a home church is sort of the extreme option.</v>

00:14:54.560 --> 00:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And let me know in the chat if the birds are coming</v>

00:14:56.880 --> 00:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>through a little bit too loudly.</v>

00:14:58.160 --> 00:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the south and it's spring and the birds are very</v>

00:15:00.640 --> 00:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>excited, the sun's setting.</v>

00:15:02.640 --> 00:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you join a church body, you are joining that local</v>

00:15:07.360 --> 00:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>parish, and it may very well be a very good church, and</v>

00:15:10.160 --> 00:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's great if you have that.</v>

00:15:12.560 --> 00:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Starting up a home church is the last resort.</v>

00:15:15.920 --> 00:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, if you don't have faithful church bodies, if they are</v>

00:15:19.680 --> 00:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>all so apostate around you that you cannot in good conscience attend</v>

00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>any one of them, then start a home church.</v>

00:15:27.680 --> 00:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>That's basically the hierarchy.</v>

00:15:29.520 --> 00:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Find a good parish.</v>

00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>If none are available, start a home church.</v>

00:15:33.440 --> 00:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing wrong with starting a home church.</v>

00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just not preferable.</v>

00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't really want to have to go back to 100 AD,</v>

00:15:39.520 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>right? You'd sort of rather have the benefit of all of the</v>

00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>development in terms of the building and the liturgy and all those</v>

00:15:47.040 --> 00:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>things over the last two thousand years.</v>

00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you have to, start a home church.</v>

00:16:01.920 --> 00:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Question three.</v>

00:16:03.920 --> 00:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>My brother and his wife are pregnant.</v>

00:16:06.800 --> 00:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully just she's pregnant, but with their first child, they did the</v>

00:16:10.880 --> 00:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ultrasound, sadly, I don't have a problem with ultrasounds, but that's not</v>

00:16:16.400 --> 00:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the question.</v>

00:16:17.200 --> 00:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And found out that their first child will be a boy.</v>

00:16:19.760 --> 00:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Would I be sinfully binding my brother's conscience by telling him that</v>

00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe circumcision is not a wise decision.</v>

00:16:26.240 --> 00:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Do we know for certain that the procedure of circumcision that God</v>

00:16:29.280 --> 00:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>commanded the Israelites is not the same procedure that is performed today?</v>

00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll take those in reverse order.</v>

00:16:36.640 --> 00:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So we do know that the procedure that was done back then</v>

00:16:40.080 --> 00:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is not the same.</v>

00:16:40.960 --> 00:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a cutting of the tip of the foreskin, not the</v>

00:16:43.680 --> 00:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>removal of the full foreskin.</v>

00:16:45.520 --> 00:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of places in scripture where you can infer</v>

00:16:50.240 --> 00:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this. Now archaeologically and historically we know that is the case, but</v>

00:16:53.680 --> 00:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there are number of places in scripture where there are narratives that</v>

00:16:56.800 --> 00:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>do not make sense if it were a removal of the full</v>

00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>foreskin. One of the most telling is when Joshua crosses over the</v>

00:17:05.680 --> 00:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Jordan and they're going toward Jericho to sack Jericho, they have to</v>

00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>circumcise everyone who was wandering in the desert because they weren't circumcised</v>

00:17:14.960 --> 00:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the way the way.</v>

00:17:15.760 --> 00:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, these are thirty, forty-year-old men and others as well,</v>

00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously. Eight days old and up, right?</v>

00:17:22.960 --> 00:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>These are the men who are then going to have to go</v>

00:17:24.800 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and walk around the city for a number of days and then</v>

00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>fight and take the city.</v>

00:17:30.480 --> 00:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>If it were the removal of the full foreskin, I think all</v>

00:17:33.680 --> 00:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the men in the audience recognize, you would need a little while</v>

00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to recover from that as a 40-year-old man or a 30-year-old or</v>

00:17:39.600 --> 00:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a 20-year-old man, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:17:42.080 --> 00:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really need much time to recover.</v>

00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Another one would be when the angel of the Lord is pursuing</v>

00:17:48.480 --> 00:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Moses as he is going from Midian back to Egypt because he</v>

00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>had failed to circumcise his sons while he was in Midian, and</v>

00:17:56.720 --> 00:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>his wife takes a stone tool and circumcises the sun.</v>

00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>You're probably not going to do that quickly with a stone tool</v>

00:18:04.960 --> 00:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>if it is the removal of the full foreskin, I think that's</v>

00:18:08.720 --> 00:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious that's kind of a delicate operation that requires a degree</v>

00:18:12.960 --> 00:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of skill and much better tools.</v>

00:18:15.360 --> 00:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think taken together it's pretty obvious which sort of circumcision</v>

00:18:20.160 --> 00:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is in view in scripture.</v>

00:18:21.680 --> 00:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just the removal of the tip of the foreskin or a</v>

00:18:24.880 --> 00:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cut in the foreskin.</v>

00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not total removal, completely different thing.</v>

00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That is a modern abomination that has been pushed on many in</v>

00:18:34.560 --> 00:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, particularly Americans.</v>

00:18:37.520 --> 00:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So would you be binding his conscience by telling him, say it's</v>

00:18:41.840 --> 00:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Judaizing, it is impermissible mutilation of your son, something like that?</v>

00:18:46.160 --> 00:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You are binding his conscience, but I think it's permissible.</v>

00:18:49.280 --> 00:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that if you succeed in that, his son will</v>

00:18:52.880 --> 00:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly thank you later in life when he realizes who did that</v>

00:18:56.000 --> 00:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for him.</v>

00:18:56.880 --> 00:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that it is objectionable to bind your brother's</v>

00:19:00.480 --> 00:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>conscience with regard to this.</v>

00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>He should put his foot down and say, I am not s</v>

00:19:05.040 --> 00:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I am not circumcising my son, and his wife just has to</v>

00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>obey in that.</v>

00:19:09.760 --> 00:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that is not just something that you could</v>

00:19:13.520 --> 00:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>do, but something that you should do in this case.</v>

00:19:18.160 --> 00:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And also the historical argument, this is not something Christians did.</v>

00:19:22.960 --> 00:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The Greek converts, with very few exceptions, were not circumcised.</v>

00:19:27.520 --> 00:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And basically every Christian convert after that was not circumcised.</v>

00:19:31.840 --> 00:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>This is completely novel and almost exclusive to the American context outside</v>

00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of parts of the world that are say Islamic where they practice</v>

00:19:39.200 --> 00:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it as well.</v>

00:19:46.720 --> 00:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Question four.</v>

00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I have recently gotten a girlfriend and this woman is everything I've</v>

00:19:52.720 --> 00:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ever wanted in a woman.</v>

00:19:53.760 --> 00:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>She wears head coverings and skirts without being asked.</v>

00:19:56.080 --> 00:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>She wants to cook and do the dishes for me.</v>

00:19:57.920 --> 00:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>She wants multiple children.</v>

00:19:59.600 --> 00:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>She's deeply caring and concerning and there are many other things.</v>

00:20:03.840 --> 00:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think she would make an amazing wife, and yet I seem</v>

00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>unattracted or bored, although she is somewhat cute.</v>

00:20:10.320 --> 00:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I was very infatuated with her in the first few weeks that</v>

00:20:13.040 --> 00:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I met her, but it is not quite the same now.</v>

00:20:15.520 --> 00:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I know I would be an absolute fool to throw away such</v>

00:20:18.160 --> 00:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing.</v>

00:20:19.040 --> 00:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I do really like her and I deeply care about her, but</v>

00:20:21.520 --> 00:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I have that problem.</v>

00:20:22.480 --> 00:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Am I just getting used to her in my life and have</v>

00:20:25.040 --> 00:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten over the initial thrill of finding exactly what I want?</v>

00:20:28.320 --> 00:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I trying to be emotional about her when I don't need</v>

00:20:31.440 --> 00:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to be as a man in parentheses there?</v>

00:20:34.560 --> 00:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Will my feelings grow?</v>

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there just an ebb and flow that I am making out</v>

00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more than what it is?</v>

00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I was exhausted the day that I thought this, so perhaps I'm</v>

00:20:43.600 --> 00:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>overthinking it.</v>

00:20:45.600 --> 00:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>This touches obviously on a number of</v>

00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>profound issues, but I think the general takeaway is that there is</v>

00:20:55.760 --> 00:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental difference between infatuation and love, right?</v>

00:21:00.400 --> 00:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, for some people, there the one can kind of shade into</v>

00:21:04.640 --> 00:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the other to some degree.</v>

00:21:06.800 --> 00:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>For men, there's obviously a spectrum.</v>

00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Not all men are monolithic in one way or the other, right?</v>

00:21:12.560 --> 00:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is also going to be racial a little bit too,</v>

00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously. Germans are not going to behave in the same way as</v>

00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish, or certainly as you know, Africans or Asians.</v>

00:21:22.560 --> 00:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>There are different ways of expressing these things and different ways of</v>

00:21:25.760 --> 00:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling them to some degree as well.</v>

00:21:28.080 --> 00:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:21:29.520 --> 00:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the early th feelings there that you had could correctly, as</v>

00:21:34.800 --> 00:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you said, be termed infatuation.</v>

00:21:37.600 --> 00:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a sort of different thing from building marriage, right?</v>

00:21:42.880 --> 00:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Marriage is a lifelong, long-term, serious commitment, and it is something that</v>

00:21:48.960 --> 00:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is built over a course of years.</v>

00:21:51.120 --> 00:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Part of the way you build that is by having children and</v>

00:21:54.880 --> 00:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>living with this person.</v>

00:21:56.800 --> 00:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Now</v>

00:21:58.480 --> 00:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to be</v>

00:22:01.600 --> 00:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>emotionally tethered in the way that you perhaps desire right now.</v>

00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That will develop over time.</v>

00:22:09.200 --> 00:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>For men, that is going to be something that is going to</v>

00:22:12.080 --> 00:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>deepen as you spend years Spend years with this woman as you</v>

00:22:15.200 --> 00:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>build your life with her, as she births your children, takes care</v>

00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of your home, cooks you meals, does all these things, right?</v>

00:22:23.040 --> 00:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That is something that is accumulated over time, and we all recognize</v>

00:22:27.040 --> 00:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this with regard to almost everything, right?</v>

00:22:30.080 --> 00:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I could say I don't actually have a favorite pen,</v>

00:22:33.360 --> 00:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if I had a favorite pen, it's partly going</v>

00:22:36.480 --> 00:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to be because of how often I've used the thing.</v>

00:22:39.440 --> 00:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be just because oh I found a shiny</v>

00:22:41.680 --> 00:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>pen, very neat.</v>

00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I conveniently picked a shiny one.</v>

00:22:44.960 --> 00:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I do have some that I like more than others that I</v>

00:22:47.520 --> 00:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>write with all the time, and it's partly because I write with</v>

00:22:50.640 --> 00:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>them all the time.</v>

00:22:51.120 --> 00:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I've had them for a long time.</v>

00:22:53.200 --> 00:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:22:55.360 --> 00:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't look at this as a negative.</v>

00:22:58.400 --> 00:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>This is not a problem.</v>

00:23:00.080 --> 00:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you just if this is, you know, the first serious girlfriend</v>

00:23:04.160 --> 00:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you had, then you this is a new experience for you.</v>

00:23:06.320 --> 00:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You've not developed sort of the responses and you don't know your</v>

00:23:11.360 --> 00:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>own internal states with regard to how you're going to deal with</v>

00:23:14.720 --> 00:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this new part of your life.</v>

00:23:16.960 --> 00:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So So no, I don't think that you need to be concerned</v>

00:23:19.840 --> 00:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>about this.</v>

00:23:20.640 --> 00:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Be glad that God has blessed you with this sort of woman</v>

00:23:23.760 --> 00:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully everything turns out well and you marry her and have</v>

00:23:27.040 --> 00:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>some number of children, whatever number God chooses to give you.</v>

00:23:30.800 --> 00:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So So</v>

00:23:32.960 --> 00:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it I think it is important though to draw that distinction between</v>

00:23:35.920 --> 00:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of the emotional infatuation of something novel.</v>

00:23:39.360 --> 00:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Right. It's this it's the level of excitement of opening an Amazon</v>

00:23:42.880 --> 00:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>box. Ooh, I have new stuff.</v>

00:23:45.680 --> 00:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fine.</v>

00:23:46.880 --> 00:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That little dopamine hit, great, whatever.</v>

00:23:49.360 --> 00:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not what sustains, in this case, the most one of the</v>

00:23:53.680 --> 00:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>most important relationships in your life.</v>

00:23:55.200 --> 00:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not what builds something long term.</v>

00:23:59.120 --> 00:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a completely different thing.</v>

00:24:00.800 --> 00:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not nothing.</v>

00:24:01.680 --> 00:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not unimportant.</v>

00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But with regard to this, with regard to marriage, I don't think</v>

00:24:08.000 --> 00:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to worry at all about that.</v>

00:24:09.600 --> 00:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Just put that out of your mind.</v>

00:24:11.200 --> 00:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Particularly if you were tired that day, then by all means sleep</v>

00:24:14.240 --> 00:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it off and see how you feel the next day.</v>

00:24:16.800 --> 00:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But no.</v>

00:24:18.160 --> 00:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Infatuation is not love, and love is not infatuation, and if The</v>

00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>infatuation fades, that doesn't mean there's no love there.</v>

00:24:31.760 --> 00:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Question five.</v>

00:24:34.560 --> 00:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Is there a biblical principle for the punishment of a human judge</v>

00:24:38.720 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>who releases a violent criminal who subsequently commits murder?</v>

00:24:43.440 --> 00:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Similar to Exodus twenty-one, twenty-nine.</v>

00:24:46.720 --> 00:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'll pull that up.</v>

00:24:54.720 --> 00:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me</v>

00:24:56.960 --> 00:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and pull that up so everyone can see what I</v>

00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>see.</v>

00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Ah yes, but if the bull was prone to gore before yesterday</v>

00:25:06.800 --> 00:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and before the third day and they warn its owner, and he</v>

00:25:09.440 --> 00:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>does not restrain it and it kills a man or woman, the</v>

00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bull shall be stoned, and its owner shall die as well.</v>

00:25:17.040 --> 00:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And so of course this is one of the sections that gives</v>

00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you a standard for</v>

00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>basically prior knowledge.</v>

00:25:25.360 --> 00:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>If you have knowledge of the nature of nature of one of</v>

00:25:27.840 --> 00:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your animals and you know it is prone to hurt people.</v>

00:25:30.720 --> 00:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps we can think of a certain species, certain breed of</v>

00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>dog here.</v>

00:25:34.720 --> 00:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you have an animal that is known to injure, and</v>

00:25:37.760 --> 00:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>then it goes and does that, it is a different thing from</v>

00:25:40.800 --> 00:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if the animal just suddenly spooks and does something, right?</v>

00:25:45.200 --> 00:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that there is somewhat of a parallel we</v>

00:25:49.840 --> 00:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>can draw out there, but I would think maybe go to Exodus</v>

00:25:53.360 --> 00:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty</v>

00:25:54.800 --> 00:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me find the verse.</v>

00:25:58.000 --> 00:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Starting with verse six, I think, is going to be a</v>

00:26:02.640 --> 00:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>little more on point here.</v>

00:26:04.240 --> 00:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You shall not pervert judgment of a poor man in his trial,</v>

00:26:07.200 --> 00:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>from every unjust thing said you shall keep away, an innocent and</v>

00:26:11.040 --> 00:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just person you shall not kill, and you shall not acquit the</v>

00:26:14.480 --> 00:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>impious person for the sake of bribes, and you shall not take</v>

00:26:18.080 --> 00:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>bribes, for bribes blind the eyes of those who see and corrupt</v>

00:26:22.240 --> 00:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just matters.</v>

00:26:23.680 --> 00:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:26:24.880 --> 00:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>judges are put in a particular position of authority and they have</v>

00:26:28.640 --> 00:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>duties both to society and to God.</v>

00:26:31.520 --> 00:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And And when they fail in those duties, yes, I think it</v>

00:26:35.120 --> 00:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is</v>

00:26:36.400 --> 00:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the higher magistrate, so whomever that happens to be, he then has</v>

00:26:40.800 --> 00:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a duty to punish them.</v>

00:26:42.800 --> 00:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So our system kind of makes it a bit of a hash,</v>

00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>quite a mess as to which individual is supposed to punish whom,</v>

00:26:49.520 --> 00:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>right? Who has authority over judges.</v>

00:26:51.920 --> 00:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay. But that doesn't mean that just because we've tried to attenuate</v>

00:26:56.000 --> 00:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>things that God's going to go, oh, your system is confusing and</v>

00:26:58.560 --> 00:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>complex. You're morally excused.</v>

00:27:00.720 --> 00:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not how it works.</v>

00:27:02.240 --> 00:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Kinda ties back into the vice presidents and the LCMS calling themselves</v>

00:27:07.200 --> 00:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>vice presidents instead of bishops.</v>

00:27:09.280 --> 00:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You're still getting a bishop's judgment.</v>

00:27:11.040 --> 00:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter what you call yourself or put on your business cards.</v>

00:27:13.680 --> 00:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So So</v>

00:27:15.280 --> 00:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>yes, a judge who releases a violent criminal, knowing him to be</v>

00:27:19.680 --> 00:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a violent criminal, has perverted justice and should be punished by the</v>

00:27:24.080 --> 00:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>higher magistrate.</v>

00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that runs all throughout scripture.</v>

00:27:27.920 --> 00:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>All of the places that deal with justice and God's care for</v>

00:27:33.280 --> 00:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you know the poor man who can't receive justice or his hatred</v>

00:27:37.520 --> 00:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of those who pervert justice for the sake of the wealthy, which</v>

00:27:41.440 --> 00:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is also in play here, right?</v>

00:27:43.440 --> 00:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Because you have all these organizations that advocate for not punishing the</v>

00:27:47.280 --> 00:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guilty. That's the same thing as a bribe.</v>

00:27:49.600 --> 00:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Just because money didn't exchange hands doesn't mean it doesn't count as</v>

00:27:52.560 --> 00:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a bribe.</v>

00:27:53.360 --> 00:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Because you still have the social perks and all of the articles,</v>

00:27:57.680 --> 00:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the op-eds and New York Times and things like that, right?</v>

00:28:00.560 --> 00:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are also bribes.</v>

00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Morally speaking, and so that thread that runs all throughout of scripture</v>

00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is very clear.</v>

00:28:08.160 --> 00:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, judges that pervert justice must be punished.</v>

00:28:15.920 --> 00:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Question six.</v>

00:28:17.840 --> 00:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>If the following three things had to be ordered from most important</v>

00:28:21.360 --> 00:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to least in deciding where to move, how would you rank them?</v>

00:28:25.040 --> 00:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Assuming only a single option is possible without the other two</v>

00:28:29.760 --> 00:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Land or self-sustainability is the first.</v>

00:28:32.560 --> 00:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The second is church community that is compatible, so for the family,</v>

00:28:37.760 --> 00:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and three is to be near your aging parents.</v>

00:28:44.160 --> 00:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The problem that I have in answering this one, and I guess</v>

00:28:46.800 --> 00:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't need the logos window up right now.</v>

00:28:50.320 --> 00:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>The problem that I have in answering this one is it would</v>

00:28:52.320 --> 00:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>depend on if you're asking me as me or me as a</v>

00:28:55.360 --> 00:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical man, because you know, the hypothetical man, well do you have</v>

00:29:01.520 --> 00:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a wife and children for whom you have to care?</v>

00:29:04.480 --> 00:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Then obviously self sustainability, land, that's going to rank higher for that</v>

00:29:09.280 --> 00:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>man, right?</v>

00:29:10.000 --> 00:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that particular set of duties.</v>

00:29:13.840 --> 00:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that is going to rank lower in my case, although</v>

00:29:17.040 --> 00:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I moved to Tennessee in part so there there's land.</v>

00:29:20.160 --> 00:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:29:21.680 --> 00:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to depend on where you are in life</v>

00:29:26.640 --> 00:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and what you have that has been entrusted to your care.</v>

00:29:30.960 --> 00:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a single man, then obviously being near to your</v>

00:29:34.640 --> 00:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>aging parents to care for them is going to rank higher because</v>

00:29:38.240 --> 00:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have competing duties.</v>

00:29:41.520 --> 00:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think the overall answer here to ignore the restrictions on</v>

00:29:46.000 --> 00:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the question, but to give the the answer that I would actually</v>

00:29:49.520 --> 00:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>give. Find somewhere that you would have good employment, whether that is</v>

00:29:54.480 --> 00:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>land and self sustainability.</v>

00:29:57.040 --> 00:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I've mixed feelings on you the whole homesteading thing because if society</v>

00:30:01.280 --> 00:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>collapses are you really going to provide for everyone around you and</v>

00:30:04.880 --> 00:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>defend it and all that?</v>

00:30:06.000 --> 00:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's a sort of tangential discussion.</v>

00:30:10.080 --> 00:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But find somewhere that you can live provide for yourself, those entrusted</v>

00:30:14.080 --> 00:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to your care, move your parents with you.</v>

00:30:16.880 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>If they are your aging parents and it's to the point where</v>

00:30:19.920 --> 00:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to take care of them, they probably don't have that</v>

00:30:22.960 --> 00:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>many of their friends left around them just because of the reality</v>

00:30:26.160 --> 00:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of age of age.</v>

00:30:27.760 --> 00:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So move them with you so they'll be near their grandchildren if</v>

00:30:31.520 --> 00:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>God has blessed you with grandchildren.</v>

00:30:33.520 --> 00:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And if there is a good church, great, if not, start one.</v>

00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Same answer as always.</v>

00:30:38.160 --> 00:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Start a home church if you can't find a good church.</v>

00:30:49.600 --> 00:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Question seven.</v>

00:30:50.720 --> 00:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking briefly at the chat.</v>

00:30:52.320 --> 00:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I see there are some questions.</v>

00:30:53.440 --> 00:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I may note those for next time.</v>

00:30:55.200 --> 00:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I may not get to them tonight.</v>

00:30:58.800 --> 00:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Bolsheviks aside, do you think any explicit deals were made with the</v>

00:31:02.720 --> 00:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>devil by any of the allies in either world war, as opposed</v>

00:31:06.240 --> 00:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to merely his usurious children.</v>

00:31:10.560 --> 00:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there were any sort of explicit deals with</v>

00:31:14.560 --> 00:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the devil.</v>

00:31:15.120 --> 00:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there was any demonic rituals involved?</v>

00:31:20.640 --> 00:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Other than, of course, the fact that you had a lot of</v>

00:31:22.640 --> 00:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Freemasons and their rituals are demonic, so that's sort of the easy</v>

00:31:26.880 --> 00:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes because.</v>

00:31:29.200 --> 00:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But was there anything sort of above and beyond that?</v>

00:31:32.240 --> 00:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.</v>

00:31:32.800 --> 00:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not aware of any particular evidence for it.</v>

00:31:36.080 --> 00:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I do know that there is a lot of involvement in the</v>

00:31:41.520 --> 00:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>demonic and the occult with regard to the early foundations of computers</v>

00:31:47.120 --> 00:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and also on certainly the part of the Americans, probably the Russians</v>

00:31:51.120 --> 00:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, the space race.</v>

00:31:53.120 --> 00:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Because for instance, the head of JPL was good friends with Crowley.</v>

00:31:58.560 --> 00:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:31:59.920 --> 00:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for those who know the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, one</v>

00:32:03.200 --> 00:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of the most advanced for that particular area of research, and then</v>

00:32:07.360 --> 00:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Alistair Crowley basically created his own version of Satanism and demon worship.</v>

00:32:14.080 --> 00:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah.</v>

00:32:15.920 --> 00:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely stuff involved there after the war.</v>

00:32:18.720 --> 00:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there was anything explicit during the war.</v>

00:32:20.880 --> 00:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of weird stuff going on during the war</v>

00:32:23.440 --> 00:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>though, so it would not surprise me in the least.</v>

00:32:29.920 --> 00:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Question eight.</v>

00:32:31.440 --> 00:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is actually related to the previous one tangentially.</v>

00:32:35.120 --> 00:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>You've brought up 40k a couple times, so I'm curious what your</v>

00:32:38.400 --> 00:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>involvement with the hobby is or was.</v>

00:32:40.640 --> 00:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually have never played 40K.</v>

00:32:42.880 --> 00:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't played the games, incidentally.</v>

00:32:44.880 --> 00:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I've just picked up some of the lore as it were from</v>

00:32:49.280 --> 00:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>being around others who have played the games and both the computer</v>

00:32:53.360 --> 00:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>games and the tabletop.</v>

00:32:54.800 --> 00:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So it has a lot of interesting themes in it.</v>

00:32:58.720 --> 00:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think probably despite seemingly despite the intentions of the creators,</v>

00:33:03.920 --> 00:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it really does have some pretty strong Christian themes in it.</v>

00:33:06.560 --> 00:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's just going to come through for a creator, an author</v>

00:33:10.960 --> 00:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>living in a Christian environment, because you're steeped in it.</v>

00:33:14.640 --> 00:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't avoid it.</v>

00:33:15.920 --> 00:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So but no, I haven't personally played any of it.</v>

00:33:20.800 --> 00:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to get into a hobby that is going</v>

00:33:24.320 --> 00:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to take up more space and time.</v>

00:33:25.680 --> 00:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I have enough and it's expensive.</v>

00:33:27.120 --> 00:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I have enough of those as is.</v>

00:33:30.080 --> 00:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Question nine.</v>

00:33:31.200 --> 00:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>From a Lutheran slash Christian perspective, is xenotransplantation, which then in parentheses</v>

00:33:37.360 --> 00:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>explained, using animal organs like pig hearts, kidneys, and human patients ethically</v>

00:33:41.680 --> 00:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>acceptable. How should Christians balance caring for human life with concerns about</v>

00:33:45.920 --> 00:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>stewardship of animals and crossing natural boundaries?</v>

00:33:49.280 --> 00:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And more broadly, how should Christians think about this in light of</v>

00:33:52.400 --> 00:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the modern pursuit of extending human lifespan?</v>

00:33:55.360 --> 00:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Does this reflect faithful use of medicine or a problematic desire to</v>

00:33:59.360 --> 00:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>push beyond God given limits?</v>

00:34:11.440 --> 00:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, without this sort of medical treatment, you would not have Stone</v>

00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Choir, at least not in the form that it took.</v>

00:34:19.600 --> 00:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Not my case, but in Woe's case.</v>

00:34:22.080 --> 00:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:34:23.360 --> 00:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an objection to it.</v>

00:34:25.040 --> 00:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it is immoral or unethical.</v>

00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>After all, we use animals for many different things, right?</v>

00:34:32.400 --> 00:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We use them as draft animals, we use them as companions, we</v>

00:34:35.840 --> 00:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>use them for food, certainly, you know.</v>

00:34:38.480 --> 00:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I have chickens, I eat the eggs.</v>

00:34:41.200 --> 00:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't slaughtered any of the chickens yet, but I certainly eat</v>

00:34:44.320 --> 00:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the eggs You know, I'm wearing clothing that came from animals, things</v>

00:34:48.560 --> 00:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like that.</v>

00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have to die for my clothing, but God gave all</v>

00:34:53.280 --> 00:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the animals to us for our use.</v>

00:34:56.000 --> 00:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And yes, we have to steward them, we should not abuse them.</v>

00:34:58.960 --> 00:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that animal welfare laws are good.</v>

00:35:01.680 --> 00:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that we should have stricter ones.</v>

00:35:04.080 --> 00:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, I will note, I do not believe in animal rights.</v>

00:35:08.400 --> 00:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe that we have duties with regard to the natural world.</v>

00:35:13.120 --> 00:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not that the animal has a right that we are violating,</v>

00:35:16.080 --> 00:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that God has given us a duty that we are</v>

00:35:18.080 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>violating, so really it's worse because you're disobeying God, right?</v>

00:35:22.960 --> 00:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You can think of the Psalms, of course, against you you only</v>

00:35:25.440 --> 00:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have I sinned.</v>

00:35:27.040 --> 00:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:35:28.960 --> 00:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we should translate those things into our positive</v>

00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>law and that we should have strict laws protecting animals with regard</v>

00:35:37.520 --> 00:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to their treatment and slaughter practices and things like that, we should</v>

00:35:41.120 --> 00:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ban kosher and halal.</v>

00:35:44.080 --> 00:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Animals should not be kept in cages their entire lives.</v>

00:35:47.680 --> 00:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We should care for the natural world as stewards, like God intended</v>

00:35:52.320 --> 00:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for us to be.</v>

00:35:53.600 --> 00:35:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have any objection to using, and it's really fairly</v>

00:35:57.760 --> 00:36:00.240
<v Speaker 1>limited, what you can use from an animal and a human being</v>

00:36:00.400 --> 00:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of reasons.</v>

00:36:01.600 --> 00:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Granted, if you decellularize and then you can use that matrix in</v>

00:36:05.840 --> 00:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>order to build it back up that has more potential than just</v>

00:36:08.480 --> 00:36:10.720
<v Speaker 1>straight using the organ.</v>

00:36:10.720 --> 00:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But I'd object to it.</v>

00:36:12.400 --> 00:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And also we're slaughtering the pigs anyway, if we can use another</v>

00:36:15.280 --> 00:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the pig, that's great, then we're being less wasteful.</v>

00:36:18.800 --> 00:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that we're crossing a boundary there.</v>

00:36:21.680 --> 00:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's perfectly morally permissible.</v>

00:36:24.400 --> 00:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as using technology to extend human life is concerned, I don't</v>

00:36:30.160 --> 00:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think that God has said you have to die before you reach</v>

00:36:34.800 --> 00:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>X age.</v>

00:36:36.000 --> 00:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Right. The ages that are given in scripture are sort of a</v>

00:36:38.800 --> 00:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>ballpark of God decreasing human lifespan from what it was in the</v>

00:36:42.560 --> 00:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>age of the patriarchs.</v>

00:36:43.920 --> 00:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So So</v>

00:36:46.080 --> 00:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>can we extend our lifespan without violating something God has imposed?</v>

00:36:50.880 --> 00:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think within reason, yes we can.</v>

00:36:53.680 --> 00:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to wind up reaching the level of</v>

00:36:56.720 --> 00:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>an in you know indeterminate lifespan.</v>

00:37:00.080 --> 00:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Notably, you can't be immortal.</v>

00:37:02.160 --> 00:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Because immortal means you can't die.</v>

00:37:04.160 --> 00:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Indeterminate means you are not going to die just by aging, by</v>

00:37:08.960 --> 00:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>senescence, but you could still bu die by acute trauma, right?</v>

00:37:14.080 --> 00:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>If a train hits you, you're still going to die, even if</v>

00:37:16.960 --> 00:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't die from old age.</v>

00:37:18.960 --> 00:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if we can perhaps get there at some</v>

00:37:22.320 --> 00:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>point with advances in medical technology.</v>

00:37:24.800 --> 00:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's possible because we've kind of figured out a lot of</v>

00:37:27.680 --> 00:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that contribute to aging, right?</v>

00:37:29.920 --> 00:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Build up a plaque in the brain, the loss of the telomeres</v>

00:37:32.880 --> 00:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of your DNA, things like that.</v>

00:37:34.480 --> 00:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:37:36.080 --> 00:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we are playing God when we are making</v>

00:37:40.880 --> 00:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>these marginal improvements.</v>

00:37:42.400 --> 00:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>If we get to the level where we can actually administer some</v>

00:37:47.520 --> 00:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>treatment that makes you have an indeterminate lifespan.</v>

00:37:51.280 --> 00:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You will simply live as long as you possibly can until you</v>

00:37:55.360 --> 00:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>die by misadventure, basically.</v>

00:37:58.080 --> 00:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a different discussion.</v>

00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think then we've probably crossed a line.</v>

00:38:02.560 --> 00:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should go that far.</v>

00:38:04.640 --> 00:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But if we can extend the human lifespan by 10, 20 years</v>

00:38:08.800 --> 00:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just by, you know, various measures that maintain our health and cut</v>

00:38:13.920 --> 00:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>down on the various burdens of disease and things like that.</v>

00:38:18.080 --> 00:38:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's morally impermissible.</v>

00:38:20.320 --> 00:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's probably a good thing.</v>

00:38:22.720 --> 00:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And in part it's undoing a little bit of the curse of</v>

00:38:27.600 --> 00:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the fall, and I don't think that's wrong.</v>

00:38:30.160 --> 00:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Because if you were going to say that's wrong, you'd also say</v>

00:38:33.760 --> 00:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that spreading Christianity's wrong, because that's undoing the curse of the fall,</v>

00:38:37.440 --> 00:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in a small way.</v>

00:38:38.880 --> 00:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Or recultivating parts of the world that have been overtaken by noxious</v>

00:38:43.360 --> 00:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>plants and animals, that's undoing the effects of the fall in some</v>

00:38:46.640 --> 00:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>small way.</v>

00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's permitted.</v>

00:38:49.440 --> 00:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there a boundary there?</v>

00:38:50.960 --> 00:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>At some point, yes.</v>

00:38:52.080 --> 00:38:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So are there legitimate moral concerns?</v>

00:38:54.240 --> 00:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I just don't think we're there yet.</v>

00:38:57.840 --> 00:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean we shouldn't be thinking about them because the</v>

00:39:00.880 --> 00:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>last thing you want to do is have the technology, be able</v>

00:39:04.000 --> 00:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to flip the switch, and have never asked the moral question about</v>

00:39:07.200 --> 00:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you should.</v>

00:39:08.800 --> 00:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's something about which we should be thinking because clearly our</v>

00:39:12.960 --> 00:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>science is headed in that direction.</v>

00:39:14.880 --> 00:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think we're very close to it.</v>

00:39:17.280 --> 00:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So for the smaller things like transplanting organs, repairing damage to things,</v>

00:39:23.920 --> 00:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, cleaning out plaque in the brain if we manage to</v>

00:39:26.480 --> 00:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out that technology, I think that's all fine.</v>

00:39:28.800 --> 00:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, no one wants their parents to get Alzheimer's.</v>

00:39:31.120 --> 00:39:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine if we develop that sort of technology, it</v>

00:39:34.240 --> 00:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can solve those problems.</v>

00:39:40.480 --> 00:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>A question from a previous episode that I said I would get</v>

00:39:44.000 --> 00:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to, and I think I'll get to it now.</v>

00:39:46.240 --> 00:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Question 10 is about polygyny, so I'll just address that briefly.</v>

00:39:51.520 --> 00:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to polygyny, there are really two separate classes of</v>

00:39:57.520 --> 00:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>questions. The first is really monolithic.</v>

00:40:01.360 --> 00:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>There's only one question under that umbrella.</v>

00:40:03.600 --> 00:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it morally permissible?</v>

00:40:05.440 --> 00:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course I'm answering from a Christian worldview, because I don't</v>

00:40:08.720 --> 00:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think really most other worldviews say no.</v>

00:40:11.120 --> 00:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Christianity also doesn't say no.</v>

00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Polygyny is morally permissible, and we know this because it's never condemned</v>

00:40:20.720 --> 00:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in Scripture.</v>

00:40:21.840 --> 00:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Right? There are those who will try to go to the restrictions</v>

00:40:25.920 --> 00:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on Israel having a king, right?</v>

00:40:28.320 --> 00:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He should not acquire many wives for himself because they will lead</v>

00:40:31.200 --> 00:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>his heart astray.</v>

00:40:32.400 --> 00:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Many wives for himself is different from having three, four, five,</v>

00:40:38.560 --> 00:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:40:40.160 --> 00:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>God was saying don't be Solomon because God, when he was giving</v>

00:40:44.480 --> 00:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>those restrictions, knew what Solomon was going to do.</v>

00:40:48.160 --> 00:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Notably, God doesn't condemn what David does.</v>

00:40:51.360 --> 00:40:54.720
<v Speaker 1>David has some number of wives, I don't remember exactly how many,</v>

00:40:54.720 --> 00:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's probably like twenty total, because he also has some concubines and</v>

00:40:58.000 --> 00:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>others. So there's a pretty big difference though between 20 and a</v>

00:41:02.640 --> 00:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand, right?</v>

00:41:03.840 --> 00:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Because David had David had around that many, 20-ish, and Solomon had</v>

00:41:09.040 --> 00:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a thousand, if you include the wives and the concubines.</v>

00:41:12.160 --> 00:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously a problem.</v>

00:41:13.760 --> 00:41:15.360
<v Speaker 1>That's led your heart astray.</v>

00:41:15.360 --> 00:41:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You have now focused on something pretty obvious what you're focusing on</v>

00:41:19.520 --> 00:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of God.</v>

00:41:21.600 --> 00:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:41:23.520 --> 00:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>another important part of this, and actually first I'll expand on the</v>

00:41:27.920 --> 00:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the morality of it because before I get to the the second</v>

00:41:31.760 --> 00:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>part, which sort of the practicality, God tells David, and this is</v>

00:41:35.920 --> 00:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a key part of the argument, this is the one where you</v>

00:41:38.640 --> 00:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>can basically shut down anyone who believes in scripture with this.</v>

00:41:43.680 --> 00:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>When God takes the wife of Uriah the Hittite, right, Bathsheba.</v>

00:41:49.040 --> 00:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>When sorry, when David takes the wife of</v>

00:41:53.600 --> 00:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>when David takes Bathsheba, right?</v>

00:41:55.440 --> 00:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>When he commits that string of sins, God sends the prophet to</v>

00:41:59.680 --> 00:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>him. And the prophet says, in God speaking through the prophet, if</v>

00:42:05.600 --> 00:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>these things that I had given you, and what he lists would</v>

00:42:08.480 --> 00:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be the house, the kingship, the wives, plural, if these things had</v>

00:42:14.560 --> 00:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not been enough, if you had asked me, I would have added</v>

00:42:17.440 --> 00:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as much more to you, meaning more of these things, a bigger</v>

00:42:21.440 --> 00:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>kingdom, more power, more wives.</v>

00:42:25.280 --> 00:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>God offers to David that he would have given him more wives</v>

00:42:28.960 --> 00:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if he had simply asked.</v>

00:42:30.800 --> 00:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>God can't offer anything that is sin.</v>

00:42:33.680 --> 00:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So if God is ever offering a man more wives, polygyny cannot</v>

00:42:38.400 --> 00:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be sin.</v>

00:42:39.200 --> 00:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's very simple, and it's something people just breeze through that part</v>

00:42:43.040 --> 00:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of Scripture, don't pay any attention to what's going on, and so</v>

00:42:45.760 --> 00:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they miss that it's very clearly teaching you something here.</v>

00:42:49.120 --> 00:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And so is polygyny morally permissible?</v>

00:42:52.640 --> 00:42:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes. And to be clear about the terms for those who aren't</v>

00:42:55.280 --> 00:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>as familiar with them, Polygamy is having multiple spouses, multiple sexual partners.</v>

00:43:01.520 --> 00:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Polyandry is a woman having multiple husbands.</v>

00:43:05.040 --> 00:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Polygyny is a man having multiple wives.</v>

00:43:07.920 --> 00:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Polygyny is the only one that's morally permissible.</v>

00:43:10.480 --> 00:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>A woman can never have multiple husbands.</v>

00:43:13.440 --> 00:43:16.720
<v Speaker 1>A woman is the wife of one man, period.</v>

00:43:16.720 --> 00:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And there are many places in scripture that touch on that that's</v>

00:43:19.520 --> 00:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really not even up for debate.</v>

00:43:21.120 --> 00:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone's going to argue against that one.</v>

00:43:24.800 --> 00:43:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The second question is the practicality.</v>

00:43:28.000 --> 00:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Gonna have a sip of tea before I get into that.</v>

00:43:39.760 --> 00:43:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So the practicality is different because</v>

00:43:44.160 --> 00:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>polygyny is morally permissible.</v>

00:43:47.760 --> 00:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It is not morally required, right?</v>

00:43:49.360 --> 00:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not fundamentalist Mormons.</v>

00:43:51.200 --> 00:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying that you must have multiple wives or you don't</v>

00:43:54.000 --> 00:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>get your own planet, whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:43:58.480 --> 00:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>If it is necessary, if it is good for society, then it</v>

00:44:01.920 --> 00:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>can be permitted in society.</v>

00:44:04.000 --> 00:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But society can also ban it, because it is not morally required.</v>

00:44:08.000 --> 00:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>God does not say you must permit it, God says you may</v>

00:44:11.200 --> 00:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>permit it.</v>

00:44:12.640 --> 00:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So, if for instance you have a large war, more men die</v>

00:44:18.960 --> 00:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>than women in most wars.</v>

00:44:22.080 --> 00:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't need that many men to replenish a population.</v>

00:44:26.320 --> 00:44:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You do need a lot of women.</v>

00:44:27.760 --> 00:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And so if you have one man for every ten women because</v>

00:44:32.160 --> 00:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you had a disastrous war, polygyny is one of the ways that</v>

00:44:36.480 --> 00:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you solve the problem.</v>

00:44:38.160 --> 00:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a temporary solution.</v>

00:44:39.920 --> 00:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And you can also see, just by virtue of that example, it's</v>

00:44:43.680 --> 00:44:45.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a solution to a problem.</v>

00:44:45.760 --> 00:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It should not be considered the norm.</v>

00:44:48.080 --> 00:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Because the ideal, which is a different thing, the ideal is one</v>

00:44:52.320 --> 00:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>man, one woman for life, right?</v>

00:44:54.960 --> 00:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And then hopefully you die relatively near so that one doesn't have</v>

00:44:57.920 --> 00:45:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to outlive the other for ten years or whatever.</v>

00:45:00.080 --> 00:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the ideal.</v>

00:45:01.840 --> 00:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have polygyny be a goal.</v>

00:45:06.400 --> 00:45:07.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not what it is.</v>

00:45:07.280 --> 00:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't necessarily want to aspire to have five, six, seven, ten</v>

00:45:11.680 --> 00:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>wives. That is a measure that society can undertake if necessary due</v>

00:45:18.000 --> 00:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to some other circumstances.</v>

00:45:20.880 --> 00:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:45:22.160 --> 00:45:24.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's something that'll be relevant in the future.</v>

00:45:24.720 --> 00:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's the answer is that it's two parts.</v>

00:45:28.000 --> 00:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>One, it's morally permissible, and two, we probably should not permit it</v>

00:45:32.000 --> 00:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as a society unless we have to.</v>

00:45:35.920 --> 00:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's a question and the answer really, not the question.</v>

00:45:39.840 --> 00:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an answer that makes a lot of people angry, but it's</v>

00:45:43.200 --> 00:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very clear in scripture and</v>

00:45:46.080 --> 00:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason, ironically, that it makes many in the West uncomfortable, other</v>

00:45:52.480 --> 00:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>than obviously you have the the male feminists, which who cares what</v>

00:45:55.680 --> 00:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they think, they have adopted a lot of the beliefs of their</v>

00:46:01.360 --> 00:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>ancestors because basically all of the European tribes, particularly the Western European</v>

00:46:06.960 --> 00:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tribes, were noted for being monogamous and for not having a whole</v>

00:46:12.480 --> 00:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of wise polygyny was not a thing.</v>

00:46:15.120 --> 00:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And this was unusual compared to other parts of the world.</v>

00:46:18.720 --> 00:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that carried forward in our culture, and it's consonant with</v>

00:46:23.040 --> 00:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Christianity because it is the Christian ideal, but you have people sort</v>

00:46:27.280 --> 00:46:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of making this argument against polygyny because it just makes them feel</v>

00:46:31.760 --> 00:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>weird, because it's not something our culture has practiced historically, but it's</v>

00:46:36.080 --> 00:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not morally impermissible, because the moral argument is very straightforward, it's very</v>

00:46:40.480 --> 00:46:44.000
<v Speaker 1>clear in scripture if you just read what's on the page, but</v>

00:46:44.320 --> 00:46:48.240
<v Speaker 1>again it's not something we aspire to, it's not something we want</v>

00:46:48.240 --> 00:46:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for society.</v>

00:46:49.280 --> 00:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, given that it is usually a solution when you had</v>

00:46:52.560 --> 00:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a disastrous war, it's probably something we'd rather avoid.</v>

00:46:56.000 --> 00:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:46:58.400 --> 00:47:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And I know that many are going to sort of as a</v>

00:47:01.280 --> 00:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tangential subseri question to that, right?</v>

00:47:03.600 --> 00:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Many are going to tie it into hypergamy and promiscuity and all</v>

00:47:08.240 --> 00:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the problems that we have today.</v>

00:47:10.160 --> 00:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:47:11.600 --> 00:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't tie historically.</v>

00:47:13.600 --> 00:47:15.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no real connection there.</v>

00:47:15.440 --> 00:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have the hypergamy and the polygyny and the promiscuity historically.</v>

00:47:21.040 --> 00:47:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It was not part of Western European culture.</v>

00:47:24.240 --> 00:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So what we have today is very much a product of enemy</v>

00:47:28.480 --> 00:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>action. It is abnormal.</v>

00:47:31.360 --> 00:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It stands out in history because it is not part of our</v>

00:47:34.160 --> 00:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>history. It's not part of our culture.</v>

00:47:35.600 --> 00:47:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's no connection there.</v>

00:47:38.720 --> 00:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Usually when people are tying genetic bottlenecks from, you know, hundreds or</v>

00:47:44.720 --> 00:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years ago.</v>

00:47:46.080 --> 00:47:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They're usually looking at the result of a war.</v>

00:47:48.320 --> 00:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And there wasn't a genetic bottleneck because one man took all the</v>

00:47:51.680 --> 00:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>women for himself.</v>

00:47:52.880 --> 00:47:56.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a genetic bottleneck because all the other men died.</v>

00:47:56.720 --> 00:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So the same sort of exception I was speaking of with regard</v>

00:48:00.560 --> 00:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to when polygyny could be useful for society, or effectively necessary.</v>

00:48:07.680 --> 00:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Question eleven, a lighthearted one, the note from the questioner.</v>

00:48:12.640 --> 00:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Is hyperborea just neo pagan fanfiction?</v>

00:48:16.800 --> 00:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a secret national socialist base under the ice.</v>

00:48:21.920 --> 00:48:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that exists.</v>

00:48:24.800 --> 00:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>We have the technology now where we could detect that sort of</v>

00:48:27.680 --> 00:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thing. I know someone could say, well, what if they have technology</v>

00:48:30.480 --> 00:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that can shield against that?</v>

00:48:31.680 --> 00:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well.</v>

00:48:32.720 --> 00:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that.</v>

00:48:33.680 --> 00:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of the people who argue for that</v>

00:48:37.120 --> 00:48:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and are not just arguing it in jest, are basically saying the</v>

00:48:41.360 --> 00:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>world is flat and there's an ice wall and beyond the ice</v>

00:48:44.320 --> 00:48:47.760
<v Speaker 1>wall is where all this neat stuff exists and we're basically locked</v>

00:48:47.760 --> 00:48:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in some kind of purgatory.</v>

00:48:49.280 --> 00:48:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that.</v>

00:48:50.720 --> 00:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The earth is spherical.</v>

00:48:53.520 --> 00:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The earth is not flat.</v>

00:48:55.760 --> 00:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty obvious.</v>

00:48:57.680 --> 00:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>We proved it.</v>

00:48:58.640 --> 00:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>We went over it in the episode on conspiracy theories, right?</v>

00:49:01.200 --> 00:49:04.160
<v Speaker 1>There's retroreflectors on the moon, etcetera, etc.</v>

00:49:04.160 --> 00:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't I don't believe in it to give a</v>

00:49:07.200 --> 00:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>serious answer to a lighthearted question.</v>

00:49:11.440 --> 00:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Question twelve.</v>

00:49:12.560 --> 00:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We know that Christianity in Africa actually makes a huge positive impact.</v>

00:49:17.040 --> 00:49:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Would this also be counted as an argument for the truth of</v>

00:49:21.280 --> 00:49:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the Christian religion?</v>

00:49:22.800 --> 00:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>As nothing else actually makes any kind of meaningful difference there except</v>

00:49:26.240 --> 00:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>accept Christianity.</v>

00:49:27.120 --> 00:49:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's very true.</v>

00:49:29.760 --> 00:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I will point out that there's a very tiny exception.</v>

00:49:33.600 --> 00:49:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Some Islamic areas in Africa are slightly better off than the animistic</v>

00:49:40.080 --> 00:49:44.320
<v Speaker 1>areas, but only because of the fact that Islam has a tendency</v>

00:49:44.320 --> 00:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to chop off your hands when you steal.</v>

00:49:47.360 --> 00:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That does make things better.</v>

00:49:49.360 --> 00:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So but actually improving people is different, right Stopping thieves from stealing</v>

00:49:55.120 --> 00:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is pretty easy.</v>

00:49:56.080 --> 00:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Improving men is very hard.</v>

00:49:58.240 --> 00:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that is actually a legitimate argument for Christianity.</v>

00:50:03.600 --> 00:50:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And this ties into the question I said that I am putting</v>

00:50:08.240 --> 00:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>off for next time.</v>

00:50:09.200 --> 00:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So I won't get into it deeply, but there's obviously the fact</v>

00:50:12.960 --> 00:50:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that Shinto has, in the Japanese case, done more for them than,</v>

00:50:19.280 --> 00:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>say, Hinduism has done for India, right?</v>

00:50:23.200 --> 00:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's not the case that every other religion is 100% negative</v>

00:50:29.280 --> 00:50:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with respect to whether it improves a population or not, right?</v>

00:50:33.520 --> 00:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Some are better than others.</v>

00:50:35.120 --> 00:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There is good in some of them, but they are missing certain</v>

00:50:39.120 --> 00:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things. And obviously the biggest part for Christianity is they lack the</v>

00:50:42.000 --> 00:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>gospel, right?</v>

00:50:42.640 --> 00:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So they're not salvific.</v>

00:50:43.840 --> 00:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>They can't justify you.</v>

00:50:46.400 --> 00:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean that all of them are 100% negative.</v>

00:50:50.560 --> 00:50:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Because they're not.</v>

00:50:51.760 --> 00:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as they echo God's truth, they can still be good, which</v>

00:50:56.320 --> 00:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is why some of the pagan religions were better than others, because</v>

00:50:59.680 --> 00:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they had echoes of God's truth in them, they maintained certain levels</v>

00:51:04.160 --> 00:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of order in society and hierarchy, they punished certain crimes.</v>

00:51:09.120 --> 00:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Those things are all good.</v>

00:51:11.200 --> 00:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But yes, it has certainly been the case that Christianity has been</v>

00:51:14.880 --> 00:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that has ever been able to even remotely civilize</v>

00:51:18.400 --> 00:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the African.</v>

00:51:19.840 --> 00:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And there are a number of examples of that, right?</v>

00:51:22.160 --> 00:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You can think of some of the colonial powers, and there's the</v>

00:51:25.360 --> 00:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Lutheran Church has done a lot of work in</v>

00:51:28.000 --> 00:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Madagascar and the people there are a lot better off than they</v>

00:51:31.680 --> 00:51:36.400
<v Speaker 1>were when they were animistic ancestor worshippers and the Roman Catholic Church</v>

00:51:36.400 --> 00:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>has also done work there.</v>

00:51:37.200 --> 00:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to discount what they've done as well, but it's</v>

00:51:39.600 --> 00:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest example in Africa of the Lutheran Church doing that sort</v>

00:51:43.360 --> 00:51:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing.</v>

00:51:44.800 --> 00:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So no, I I think that that is a legitimate argument for</v>

00:51:48.720 --> 00:51:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Christianity, sort of the argument from morality, from moral improvement of believers.</v>

00:51:55.760 --> 00:51:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that is legitimate.</v>

00:51:57.280 --> 00:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's not going to be the totality of the argument, but</v>

00:52:00.560 --> 00:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's always true for these arguments.</v>

00:52:02.400 --> 00:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I've pointed that out before.</v>

00:52:04.240 --> 00:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>When you're building up an argument for God or for Christianity, you</v>

00:52:08.080 --> 00:52:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can do it in pieces.</v>

00:52:09.040 --> 00:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to have one monolithic argument that ta da Jesus</v>

00:52:12.320 --> 00:52:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Christ is Lord, right?</v>

00:52:13.760 --> 00:52:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not how it works.</v>

00:52:15.920 --> 00:52:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is a legitimate aspect of arguing for Christianity, that it</v>

00:52:21.920 --> 00:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is the only thing that has been able to create real moral</v>

00:52:27.200 --> 00:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>improvement in those who are seemingly beyond improvement.</v>

00:52:33.680 --> 00:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Question 13 and then I'll do fourteen and I will get to</v>

00:52:39.040 --> 00:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>couple questions I see pending here in the chat, maybe more than</v>

00:52:41.920 --> 00:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple.</v>

00:52:43.360 --> 00:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Question 13.</v>

00:52:44.640 --> 00:52:50.720
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on Catholic and non-Catholic exorcism?</v>

00:52:51.040 --> 00:52:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I was actually thinking about this question handful of days ago, but</v>

00:52:56.880 --> 00:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that</v>

00:52:59.840 --> 00:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I necessarily have a fully fledged position on this.</v>

00:53:04.800 --> 00:53:05.760
<v Speaker 1>My general sense</v>

00:53:06.640 --> 00:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is that I think the Roman Catholics have gone too far with</v>

00:53:09.600 --> 00:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ritualism and they rely on the ritual instead of God to a</v>

00:53:13.200 --> 00:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>degree. I'm not going to say obviously, absolutely, because they're still invoking</v>

00:53:16.640 --> 00:53:17.360
<v Speaker 1>God and such.</v>

00:53:17.360 --> 00:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>They invoke Mary too, which obviously I object to that as a</v>

00:53:21.360 --> 00:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Protestant as a Lutheran.</v>

00:53:23.680 --> 00:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that non-Roman Catholics, I think that the rest of</v>

00:53:28.640 --> 00:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>us have actually gone overboard in the other direction.</v>

00:53:31.840 --> 00:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Lutherans a little less so because there are actually Lutheran rites of</v>

00:53:35.200 --> 00:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>exorcism. They are little used these days, and many of them remain</v>

00:53:39.840 --> 00:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>untranslated in Latin or German in texts that are perhaps even not</v>

00:53:45.040 --> 00:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>digitized or scanned at this point.</v>

00:53:47.440 --> 00:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people even know there are Lutheran rites of</v>

00:53:49.600 --> 00:53:50.720
<v Speaker 1>exorcism. There are.</v>

00:53:50.720 --> 00:53:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We carried that over.</v>

00:53:52.320 --> 00:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We never abandoned that.</v>

00:53:54.080 --> 00:53:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the rest of Protestantism sort of abandoned all</v>

00:53:57.600 --> 00:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the ritual.</v>

00:53:58.640 --> 00:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think ritual plays no part in it.</v>

00:54:01.920 --> 00:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it is the ritual itself that casts out</v>

00:54:06.560 --> 00:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the demon.</v>

00:54:07.680 --> 00:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But I believe in ritualistic worship of God, right?</v>

00:54:11.440 --> 00:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what the liturgy is.</v>

00:54:13.040 --> 00:54:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So So I don't think that it is inappropriate or should even</v>

00:54:16.800 --> 00:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be surprising that ritual plays some role in casting out demons, in</v>

00:54:21.600 --> 00:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>exorcism. So I think that it's not that I'm trying to be,</v>

00:54:25.520 --> 00:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a centrist and oh both sides are bad.</v>

00:54:27.120 --> 00:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I just think the Roman Catholics fell off the horse on</v>

00:54:29.840 --> 00:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one side, and most of Protestantism fell off the horse on the</v>

00:54:33.520 --> 00:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>other side.</v>

00:54:34.560 --> 00:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So it is an area where I think we have all, as</v>

00:54:38.960 --> 00:54:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Christians, been lax.</v>

00:54:40.800 --> 00:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We have stopped taking the demonics seriously.</v>

00:54:43.680 --> 00:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We have stopped dealing with these problems that are very real.</v>

00:54:47.120 --> 00:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We used to perform a house blessing ceremony, which was basically an</v>

00:54:50.400 --> 00:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>exorcism and a blessing for the house.</v>

00:54:52.480 --> 00:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That was a normal thing, and by we I mean Lutherans.</v>

00:54:55.360 --> 00:54:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That was something Lutherans used to do.</v>

00:54:57.360 --> 00:55:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that there are now a handful of Lutheran pastors who</v>

00:55:00.240 --> 00:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have started doing that for their congregants and that's great.</v>

00:55:02.880 --> 00:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But that should be normal.</v>

00:55:03.920 --> 00:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That should be a standard thing that we do.</v>

00:55:06.560 --> 00:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That should not be something that we have effectively abandoned, particularly in</v>

00:55:12.640 --> 00:55:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the American context, because we never sort of did a thorough spiritual</v>

00:55:16.400 --> 00:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>cleansing of this land.</v>

00:55:18.880 --> 00:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>There were people here worshipping demons, and in some cases pretty horrible</v>

00:55:23.520 --> 00:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>demons, for hundreds of years.</v>

00:55:26.000 --> 00:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>We should have taken that more seriously.</v>

00:55:28.400 --> 00:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We should probably exercise every square meter of this land, every square</v>

00:55:32.080 --> 00:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>foot, whichever measuring system you want to use.</v>

00:55:35.520 --> 00:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:55:36.800 --> 00:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>no, I I don't necessarily say that either one is superior to</v>

00:55:42.160 --> 00:55:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the other I think that we should take it more seriously as</v>

00:55:45.760 --> 00:55:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Christians. It's an area that we need to invest more time.</v>

00:55:49.360 --> 00:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think having exorcists should simply be a part of being</v>

00:55:53.520 --> 00:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a church.</v>

00:55:54.400 --> 00:55:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Not every parish needs one, but certainly you should have a handful</v>

00:55:58.400 --> 00:56:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of them at the level of bishop, whatever it is in your</v>

00:56:01.280 --> 00:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>particular denomination.</v>

00:56:06.320 --> 00:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Question 14.</v>

00:56:08.000 --> 00:56:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Pulling up logos again for this one.</v>

00:56:12.160 --> 00:56:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on John 4 22.</v>

00:56:14.800 --> 00:56:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesus tells a Samaritan woman, You worship what you do not know,</v>

00:56:17.920 --> 00:56:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.</v>

00:56:21.920 --> 00:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a beloved passage for neopagans and others.</v>

00:56:26.640 --> 00:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So let me pull that up here.</v>

00:56:37.280 --> 00:56:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of those places where the issue is what</v>

00:56:41.920 --> 00:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by Jew?</v>

00:56:43.040 --> 00:56:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Right? Not to go over that whole thing again, because I've gone</v>

00:56:46.560 --> 00:56:48.560
<v Speaker 1>over it so many times that is point to the episode.</v>

00:56:48.560 --> 00:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Go listen to the episode of Stone Choir dealing with the term</v>

00:56:51.200 --> 00:56:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Jew and Hebrew Israelite, etc.</v>

00:56:54.000 --> 00:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So of course, helpfully</v>

00:56:57.920 --> 00:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Lagos does not show you the interstitial, so I guess I will</v>

00:57:01.040 --> 00:57:01.840
<v Speaker 1>bring up</v>

00:57:02.720 --> 00:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this instead so we can look at the Greek</v>

00:57:08.880 --> 00:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>because</v>

00:57:10.800 --> 00:57:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we obviously want to look at the Greek for this.</v>

00:57:14.320 --> 00:57:15.520
<v Speaker 1>What is being said here?</v>

00:57:15.680 --> 00:57:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Help if I pull up the right verse when the</v>

00:57:19.440 --> 00:57:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Not James.</v>

00:57:21.440 --> 00:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So when it says Jews there, it does not actually</v>

00:57:26.640 --> 00:57:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in the actual language of scripture, which is to say the Greek</v>

00:57:30.800 --> 00:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pull up the Nestleand.</v>

00:57:33.200 --> 00:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>What it says there is Judeans Udaon.</v>

00:57:38.720 --> 00:57:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:57:40.160 --> 00:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>does it come from the Judeans?</v>

00:57:41.760 --> 00:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course I have the interstitial up my screen, but you</v>

00:57:43.840 --> 00:57:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can't see it because helpfully it does not highlight it.</v>

00:57:46.960 --> 00:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But if I highlight Jews</v>

00:57:52.480 --> 00:57:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, the software is not being cooperative, but the word there is</v>

00:57:56.560 --> 00:57:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, like I said, Judean.</v>

00:57:58.160 --> 00:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And so what is really meant here, what is he saying?</v>

00:58:00.640 --> 00:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the point that is important here I want to get across.</v>

00:58:04.400 --> 00:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>What he is saying</v>

00:58:06.320 --> 00:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is that I am the Christ.</v>

00:58:09.200 --> 00:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Salvation is from the tribe of Judah.</v>

00:58:13.040 --> 00:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I am the Christ.</v>

00:58:15.040 --> 00:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I am the lion of the tribe of Judah.</v>

00:58:17.040 --> 00:58:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what he's telling this woman.</v>

00:58:18.800 --> 00:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And so</v>

00:58:20.240 --> 00:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's the conflict there between the Samaritans, who are the ten</v>

00:58:25.600 --> 00:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>northern tribes having been miscegenated into something other than Israelite, other than</v>

00:58:30.640 --> 00:58:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew, by the Assyrians.</v>

00:58:33.360 --> 00:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to worship on their mountain, right?</v>

00:58:36.800 --> 00:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>This is our mountain, it's in our territory, we want to worship</v>

00:58:39.600 --> 00:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>here. He's pointing out that the hatred the Samaritans have for Jerusalem</v>

00:58:45.280 --> 00:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is wrong because the Christ was prophesied to die in Jerusalem, outside</v>

00:58:52.160 --> 00:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the walls, but in Jerusalem, not on the Samaritan mountain.</v>

00:58:56.080 --> 00:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's what he's pointing out.</v>

00:58:57.920 --> 00:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>He's pointing out that scripture, when it says that the Messiah, the</v>

00:59:01.920 --> 00:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Christ, is going to come from the line of Judah, is speaking</v>

00:59:04.720 --> 00:59:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the truth.</v>

00:59:05.200 --> 00:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Salvation is from the Judeans, which is just the tribe of Judah,</v>

00:59:08.240 --> 00:59:10.880
<v Speaker 1>plus some Benjaminites and a handful of Levites.</v>

00:59:11.120 --> 00:59:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And also, you are wrong with regard to hating Jerusalem for the</v>

00:59:17.280 --> 00:59:20.160
<v Speaker 1>reasons you hate it.</v>

00:59:20.160 --> 00:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So it it's just one of those things people like to bring</v>

00:59:23.120 --> 00:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>up and they like to try to argue oh well it's scripture</v>

00:59:25.840 --> 00:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is saying the Jews are chosen No scripture is saying that Christ</v>

00:59:28.800 --> 00:59:33.360
<v Speaker 1>came from the line of Judah, which if we didn't have translators</v>

00:59:33.360 --> 00:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>playing games with these terms would be much clearer.</v>

00:59:36.000 --> 00:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>It should probably say Judean there, Judean, however you want to pronounce</v>

00:59:39.360 --> 00:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it. I always pronounce it like the Latin, but it should say</v>

00:59:43.520 --> 00:59:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that instead.</v>

00:59:44.320 --> 00:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>They play the same sort of game with the word Gentiles, which</v>

00:59:47.280 --> 00:59:49.760
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't appear in anyone's scripture.</v>

00:59:49.760 --> 00:59:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Because we have the words in English for what that actually is.</v>

00:59:52.640 --> 00:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It either means heathen or nations, depending on the context.</v>

00:59:57.600 --> 01:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And depending on the word sometimes, because ethnos, ethnikos, but these are</v>

01:00:02.320 --> 01:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>little games that translators play when they're trying to Judaize.</v>

01:00:05.680 --> 01:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And it is a problem we have in pretty much all of</v>

01:00:07.920 --> 01:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the translations, but it does open the door for some neo-pagans and</v>

01:00:12.640 --> 01:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>others to play</v>

01:00:15.200 --> 01:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really dishonest games, because most of them actually know the the counter-arguments,</v>

01:00:19.840 --> 01:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just using it to deceive the weak.</v>

01:00:22.960 --> 01:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Which incidentally is what Satan likes to do.</v>

01:00:26.400 --> 01:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I will try to look through the chat to see if</v>

01:00:29.760 --> 01:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we have some questions in the chat.</v>

01:00:35.440 --> 01:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Got a sip of tea while I do that.</v>

01:00:47.520 --> 01:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>My Lutheran church uses Jewish wine.</v>

01:00:50.560 --> 01:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, a lot of people love to use the Menishevitz.</v>

01:00:53.440 --> 01:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Then there's whatever the other one is.</v>

01:00:55.120 --> 01:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I am conflicted between not wanting to give them money but laughing</v>

01:00:58.480 --> 01:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at Satan's minions work being used to bless us in the Eucharist.</v>

01:01:01.280 --> 01:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts?</v>

01:01:02.160 --> 01:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:03.840 --> 01:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>The goal of the Jews with creating their wine is to make</v>

01:01:06.960 --> 01:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>wine that is unfit for the Eucharist.</v>

01:01:10.160 --> 01:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's their goal.</v>

01:01:11.360 --> 01:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Because their goal is evil, and generally that's what they're doing.</v>

01:01:16.160 --> 01:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:17.840 --> 01:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is it an invalid sacrament if you use what is effectively mutilated</v>

01:01:25.360 --> 01:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and sweetened wine?</v>

01:01:27.120 --> 01:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it invalidates the sacrament.</v>

01:01:29.920 --> 01:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it is inappropriate, and I don't think it is something</v>

01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we should approach.</v>

01:01:34.320 --> 01:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the old example I've given so many times.</v>

01:01:37.680 --> 01:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't stand right on the edge of the cliff.</v>

01:01:40.240 --> 01:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, stand back a little ways.</v>

01:01:42.640 --> 01:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:43.920 --> 01:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>just buy your church a case of wine.</v>

01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to say no.</v>

01:01:49.360 --> 01:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:50.960 --> 01:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have it reserved at the local liquor store and have your pastor</v>

01:01:54.400 --> 01:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>pick it up if you think he's going to be concerned about</v>

01:01:56.240 --> 01:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you personally delivering the case of wine.</v>

01:01:58.400 --> 01:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can buy a full case, it'll be sealed, possibly</v>

01:02:02.320 --> 01:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>even from the winery.</v>

01:02:04.160 --> 01:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Deliver that to him.</v>

01:02:05.760 --> 01:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>They're probably not going to say no to free wine.</v>

01:02:08.880 --> 01:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't.</v>

01:02:10.560 --> 01:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's an easy way to get around the problem, right?</v>

01:02:14.080 --> 01:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You basically are earmarking your tithe and instead of earmarking it for</v>

01:02:18.640 --> 01:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the church to use, you're just using it for the benefit of</v>

01:02:21.280 --> 01:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the church.</v>

01:02:21.920 --> 01:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That's something you can do.</v>

01:02:23.600 --> 01:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've bought things for my churches before instead of, you</v>

01:02:26.960 --> 01:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>know, tithing or in addition to tithing just depending.</v>

01:02:30.080 --> 01:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's a perfectly fine way to solve that.</v>

01:02:32.560 --> 01:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>They should not be using the Jewish wine.</v>

01:02:35.360 --> 01:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>They should be using natural wine.</v>

01:02:37.760 --> 01:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>You can find various explanations of what the Jews do to their</v>

01:02:42.720 --> 01:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>wine. And then maybe send one to your pastor, he can look</v>

01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at it.</v>

01:02:46.880 --> 01:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's going to depend on sort of the relationship you have with</v>

01:02:49.760 --> 01:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that pastor and what sort of pastor he is, some of them</v>

01:02:54.800 --> 01:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>will</v>

01:02:56.400 --> 01:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be more open to that than others.</v>

01:02:59.120 --> 01:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So if he's open to it by all means, lay out the</v>

01:03:02.800 --> 01:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>argument for him, but I think the easiest way is just buy</v>

01:03:05.600 --> 01:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the wine yourself.</v>

01:03:06.640 --> 01:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>If that obviously maybe it happens to coincide with exactly what you're</v>

01:03:10.320 --> 01:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>going to tithe.</v>

01:03:11.120 --> 01:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much you are tithing.</v>

01:03:13.040 --> 01:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much the wine is going to cost.</v>

01:03:15.360 --> 01:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to buy super expensive wine.</v>

01:03:18.160 --> 01:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Not because communion has to use cheap wine, but because super expensive</v>

01:03:22.640 --> 01:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>wine is usually a ripoff.</v>

01:03:24.080 --> 01:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Just a little tip there for guys who aren't as familiar with</v>

01:03:26.400 --> 01:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>wine. I think that's probably the best way to handle it though.</v>

01:03:34.480 --> 01:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Question sixteen.</v>

01:03:36.640 --> 01:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess he was question.</v>

01:03:38.320 --> 01:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Are Messianic Jews Christians?</v>

01:03:39.920 --> 01:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Almost always no?</v>

01:03:41.440 --> 01:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Because if they're Christians, they would call themselves Christians Christians, instead of</v>

01:03:47.120 --> 01:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>calling themselves messianic Jews.</v>

01:03:49.840 --> 01:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason they're calling themselves that, right?</v>

01:03:53.200 --> 01:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>If a man calls himself something, you should probably listen, he's probably</v>

01:03:56.960 --> 01:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>telling you something about himself.</v>

01:04:01.600 --> 01:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Just going to paste these into my</v>

01:04:06.240 --> 01:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>thread for the episode here so I have them for later.</v>

01:04:16.800 --> 01:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to save this one about eschatology for next time.</v>

01:04:22.720 --> 01:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Question 17.</v>

01:04:24.720 --> 01:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Where'd you get the teapot?</v>

01:04:26.400 --> 01:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It is from a German company.</v>

01:04:30.640 --> 01:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It is oh what's the it's trend glass.</v>

01:04:35.040 --> 01:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>T-R-E-N-D-G-L-A-S. And it is in the German city of Jena with J-E-N-A.</v>

01:04:43.680 --> 01:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a city that has made glassware for a very long time.</v>

01:04:48.080 --> 01:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And the nice thing about it is that it is Pyrex</v>

01:04:53.200 --> 01:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>borosilicate glass.</v>

01:04:54.560 --> 01:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Pyrex being obviously the trade name.</v>

01:04:56.720 --> 01:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the real stuff, so it's safe to have, as you</v>

01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>can see, the candle went out now, but as you can as</v>

01:05:02.480 --> 01:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you could have seen, you can apply fire directly, it handles boiling</v>

01:05:06.960 --> 01:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>water, it can go in the dishwasher, all these things.</v>

01:05:09.680 --> 01:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a great option.</v>

01:05:11.440 --> 01:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's not really actually particularly expensive, even to get it shipped</v>

01:05:15.440 --> 01:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>from Germany.</v>

01:05:16.160 --> 01:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you happen to be somewhere on the east coast, maybe</v>

01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you can get it shipped from a couple places in New York.</v>

01:05:23.760 --> 01:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, you'll probably have to get it shipped from</v>

01:05:26.720 --> 01:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Germany. But like I said, it's not as expensive as you might</v>

01:05:29.920 --> 01:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think for what it is, and you'll probably buy it once and</v>

01:05:32.480 --> 01:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have it for life.</v>

01:05:34.080 --> 01:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Unless you drop it.</v>

01:05:44.080 --> 01:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And the tea glasses are also from the same place.</v>

01:05:47.680 --> 01:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And the little stand.</v>

01:05:49.440 --> 01:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The candles, like I've said before, I this I brought this up</v>

01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on X.</v>

01:05:55.200 --> 01:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be have to choose between paraffin wax and beeswax.</v>

01:06:01.360 --> 01:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Beeswax is significantly more expensive it is better, it burns hotter, it</v>

01:06:06.800 --> 01:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>burns cleaner, it doesn't produce the volatile compounds that paraffin wax produces</v>

01:06:12.960 --> 01:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that are not particularly great for you.</v>

01:06:16.400 --> 01:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in a well-ventilated room, the difference isn't that big.</v>

01:06:21.760 --> 01:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I use both.</v>

01:06:22.880 --> 01:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I have both sitting over there.</v>

01:06:24.720 --> 01:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But the beeswax is superior.</v>

01:06:37.120 --> 01:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a question about the verses in scripture that deal with</v>

01:06:42.240 --> 01:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>wives wives submitting to their husbands, I'm going to note that one</v>

01:06:47.120 --> 01:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for next time I want to look at all of the spots</v>

01:06:50.240 --> 01:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>where it says that before I give an answer.</v>

01:06:52.400 --> 01:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:06:54.480 --> 01:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>add that</v>

01:06:57.600 --> 01:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>To my list</v>

01:07:08.720 --> 01:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Question</v>

01:07:10.720 --> 01:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is, eighteen, I believe.</v>

01:07:14.640 --> 01:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe.</v>

01:07:15.440 --> 01:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, question eighteen.</v>

01:07:16.800 --> 01:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any thoughts on why certain degeneracies such as bikinis,</v>

01:07:20.560 --> 01:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>nudity, fry copper, culture, free body culture nudity, same sort of thing.</v>

01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Took such a stronghold in the West to an extent surpassing even</v>

01:07:29.360 --> 01:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the third world, is it just liberalism?</v>

01:07:32.480 --> 01:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is largely liberalism.</v>

01:07:34.800 --> 01:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It is partly a rejection of Christianity.</v>

01:07:40.800 --> 01:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Not entirely though, because for instance in Germany, nude sunbathing and things</v>

01:07:46.960 --> 01:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like that have a pretty long history really back into the pagan</v>

01:07:51.440 --> 01:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>times and just never really went entirely away.</v>

01:07:55.200 --> 01:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm always a little bit conflicted on it, partly, you know, German</v>

01:07:58.880 --> 01:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>blood, but It obviously is better if we tamp down on those</v>

01:08:03.040 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>things and at the very least don't have coed</v>

01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>nude anything.</v>

01:08:09.280 --> 01:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously a temptation.</v>

01:08:11.520 --> 01:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a problem.</v>

01:08:12.080 --> 01:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>We should not be advocating for that in Christian societies.</v>

01:08:16.800 --> 01:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't object to you know spas that have separate facilities for</v>

01:08:21.040 --> 01:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>men and women if you don't have to wear a swimsuit.</v>

01:08:23.440 --> 01:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't object to that.</v>

01:08:24.320 --> 01:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care.</v>

01:08:25.840 --> 01:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not a problem.</v>

01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Over in Europe, a lot of times those are co-ed.</v>

01:08:29.040 --> 01:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's permissible in a Christian society.</v>

01:08:32.480 --> 01:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should allow that.</v>

01:08:33.760 --> 01:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we should certainly tamp down on that.</v>

01:08:36.640 --> 01:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:08:37.840 --> 01:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it basically just took hold because of</v>

01:08:41.840 --> 01:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the post-war rejection of Christianity, sort of reactionary movements, trying to say,</v>

01:08:48.800 --> 01:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>look at how advanced and liberal and free we are.</v>

01:08:52.240 --> 01:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Look at all the liberty we have.</v>

01:08:53.360 --> 01:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Particularly you saw a lot of that in say East Germany, where</v>

01:08:56.320 --> 01:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to say, look at how free we actually are.</v>

01:08:59.120 --> 01:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The West says that we're enslaved and really it's the capital, you</v>

01:09:02.240 --> 01:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>know, all that stuff.</v>

01:09:03.360 --> 01:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

01:09:04.720 --> 01:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>no, it's by and large not good.</v>

01:09:07.360 --> 01:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's something that we should</v>

01:09:10.160 --> 01:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We should largely ban in a Christian society.</v>

01:09:14.960 --> 01:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know that there are going to be people who object</v>

01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to that.</v>

01:09:17.440 --> 01:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like I said, I have some mixed feelings on</v>

01:09:19.200 --> 01:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it, but at the very least, if you're going to have some</v>

01:09:21.600 --> 01:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of that in your society, then clearly have it sex segregated.</v>

01:09:25.440 --> 01:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's objectionable.</v>

01:09:28.800 --> 01:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's as much of a an issue of, you</v>

01:09:31.040 --> 01:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>know, modesty or whatever.</v>

01:09:32.240 --> 01:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's mostly an issue of men and women not being</v>

01:09:35.120 --> 01:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in mixed company in inappropriate attire because only your spouse should see</v>

01:09:39.440 --> 01:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you like that.</v>

01:09:40.800 --> 01:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, there should also be public decency laws with regard to</v>

01:09:44.560 --> 01:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>swimwear, particularly for women.</v>

01:09:49.440 --> 01:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And someone mentioned that, you know, we have beautiful women, so that's</v>

01:09:53.040 --> 01:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>part of it.</v>

01:09:53.520 --> 01:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It is.</v>

01:09:54.400 --> 01:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, that's the reality of it.</v>

01:09:56.960 --> 01:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>There's some parts of the world where you would definitely not want</v>

01:10:00.080 --> 01:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to see everyone naked.</v>

01:10:03.440 --> 01:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Question</v>

01:10:05.520 --> 01:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty no, it's question nineteen rather.</v>

01:10:08.960 --> 01:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do we hear so much about German occult practices during the</v>

01:10:11.760 --> 01:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>war? That's a very easy answer.</v>

01:10:13.600 --> 01:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Post-war propaganda, and during the war as well.</v>

01:10:16.640 --> 01:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Atrocity propaganda was a very common and popular thing, particularly by the</v>

01:10:22.480 --> 01:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>British, and they did this particularly against the Germans, but against others</v>

01:10:26.480 --> 01:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, and obviously it was Jewish involvement, particularly in the American</v>

01:10:30.640 --> 01:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>context, but also in the British context for propaganda to gin people</v>

01:10:34.880 --> 01:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>up to get ready to go to war.</v>

01:10:37.440 --> 01:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's all nonsense.</v>

01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing that they had was they could point out</v>

01:10:44.080 --> 01:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that, you know, the SS had nighttime rallies with torches and oh</v>

01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>look, it's paganism.</v>

01:10:49.280 --> 01:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not paganism.</v>

01:10:50.480 --> 01:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's having fire at night, it's a bonfire.</v>

01:10:53.040 --> 01:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it paganism when you go to the beach and have a</v>

01:10:55.120 --> 01:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bonfire? It's such It's so incredibly transparent and dumb, but it works.</v>

01:11:02.080 --> 01:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Because if you can hammer home a simple point with propaganda, even</v>

01:11:05.760 --> 01:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's a lie, many times it will be effective.</v>

01:11:08.320 --> 01:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you hear so much about it.</v>

01:11:09.760 --> 01:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you start to dig into it, it all evaporates because</v>

01:11:12.800 --> 01:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence for it.</v>

01:11:15.120 --> 01:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You start finding Christianity everywhere you dig.</v>

01:11:27.360 --> 01:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Guess I should put that into the show notes.</v>

01:11:30.240 --> 01:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember I answered that one.</v>

01:11:37.360 --> 01:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that is probably about it for this episode, but I'll</v>

01:11:41.120 --> 01:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>see if there's maybe one more I can answer quickly.</v>

01:11:52.960 --> 01:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I I did see the question about Galatians 3.28 for that.</v>

01:11:56.240 --> 01:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>People rightly mentioned it's about salvation, but also the episode on Galatians</v>

01:12:00.960 --> 01:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>3.28. I just go listen to that.</v>

01:12:03.280 --> 01:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>We covered it quite thoroughly.</v>

01:12:04.640 --> 01:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I've covered it elsewhere as well, but it is one hundred percent</v>

01:12:08.080 --> 01:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about salvation.</v>

01:12:08.960 --> 01:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not about obviously anything else, because then we would have to</v>

01:12:14.080 --> 01:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>say that men and women don't exist.</v>

01:12:16.240 --> 01:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And no one is really arguing that.</v>

01:12:18.960 --> 01:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the case with regard to salvation, right?</v>

01:12:21.200 --> 01:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can be saved if you're a man or a woman, if</v>

01:12:23.600 --> 01:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you are racially X or Y, and you can sub out whatever</v>

01:12:27.680 --> 01:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you want there.</v>

01:12:28.160 --> 01:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't say Jew or Greek.</v>

01:12:29.200 --> 01:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You can say Russian or German, you can say German or Japanese.</v>

01:12:31.680 --> 01:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Same thing works.</v>

01:12:32.960 --> 01:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And obviously slavery free hierarchy.</v>

01:12:37.040 --> 01:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Condemning in part the beliefs of the time, which basically thought that</v>

01:12:41.680 --> 01:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were higher up the hierarchy and therefore had greater wealth</v>

01:12:44.960 --> 01:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and resources you could contribute more to whatever, buy a synagogue, open</v>

01:12:50.400 --> 01:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a synagogue, build something, and then you were more holy because you'd</v>

01:12:53.760 --> 01:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>done that thing.</v>

01:12:54.880 --> 01:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's also part of what's being condemned there.</v>

01:12:58.560 --> 01:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think I will use</v>

01:13:01.280 --> 01:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this as the last question for this episode.</v>

01:13:05.360 --> 01:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>If God uses terraforming to punish us in our lands, the Sahara,</v>

01:13:10.160 --> 01:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>locking up India, does this suggest God found something particularly wicked in</v>

01:13:15.200 --> 01:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Antarctica? So for that, that's question twenty unless I misnumbered something</v>

01:13:22.240 --> 01:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>there. I don't think that it means God found anything particularly wicked</v>

01:13:26.640 --> 01:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there, because it seems like God intended for the climate cycles and</v>

01:13:33.360 --> 01:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the particular way that heat distributes in on our on our planet,</v>

01:13:38.080 --> 01:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>around our planet.</v>

01:13:39.120 --> 01:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that was part of his intended design.</v>

01:13:41.600 --> 01:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think Antarctica was intended to be a lush rainforest.</v>

01:13:47.120 --> 01:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that it was intended to be basically the air conditioning</v>

01:13:50.400 --> 01:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for the planet.</v>

01:13:51.360 --> 01:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So So I think that's just how God designed Earth to be.</v>

01:13:55.360 --> 01:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was punishment for wickedness and perhaps the Sahara</v>

01:14:00.880 --> 01:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is punishment for wickedness.</v>

01:14:02.640 --> 01:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The Himalayas are sort of a containment zone, but God built the</v>

01:14:07.280 --> 01:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>geography of the world in such a way that people groups naturally</v>

01:14:11.600 --> 01:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>spread and then spread out in certain geographies, right?</v>

01:14:15.120 --> 01:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You spread up to the mountain range, you spread out to the</v>

01:14:18.400 --> 01:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sea, things like that.</v>

01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And as we pointed out a number of times in Stone Choir,</v>

01:14:23.840 --> 01:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Earth from the satellite view, you can</v>

01:14:28.560 --> 01:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>actually see all the natural nations instead of the artificial ones, because</v>

01:14:33.760 --> 01:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see the geographic boundaries that are real as opposed to</v>

01:14:38.160 --> 01:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the man-made lines that are fake that are artificial.</v>

01:14:42.320 --> 01:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So clearly the subcontinent is meant to be separated from others.</v>

01:14:48.080 --> 01:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>South the sub-Saharan Africa is meant to be separated from others.</v>

01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why there's a giant desert that you can't cross without, you</v>

01:14:56.480 --> 01:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know, very high odds of dying even today.</v>

01:14:59.200 --> 01:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>All of these areas, and then the various mountain ranges and things</v>

01:15:02.960 --> 01:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like that.</v>

01:15:04.560 --> 01:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We should account for those natural boundaries more than we do, and</v>

01:15:08.320 --> 01:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we should respect them more than we do.</v>

01:15:10.560 --> 01:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But no, I don't think that Antarctica was particularly wicked and so</v>

01:15:14.320 --> 01:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's covered in ice and inhospitable.</v>

01:15:16.400 --> 01:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just part of how God designed the the air</v>

01:15:19.200 --> 01:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>currents and things to work.</v>

01:15:20.720 --> 01:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You can look up a map of how the the airflow works</v>

01:15:23.520 --> 01:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the the cold masses versus the warm masses and things</v>

01:15:27.040 --> 01:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like that.</v>

01:15:27.920 --> 01:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>In my case, I particularly have the example of I used to</v>

01:15:32.160 --> 01:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>live on the west coast right near the beach.</v>

01:15:35.280 --> 01:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Despite what you may think about Southern California, you think that oh</v>

01:15:38.880 --> 01:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Southern California, always sunny, warm paradise.</v>

01:15:41.920 --> 01:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The water's cold because it comes down from the North Pole.</v>

01:15:47.120 --> 01:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Whereas here on the East Coast, I'm not coastal at this point,</v>

01:15:50.480 --> 01:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but I've gone and visited the beaches, the water is very warm</v>

01:15:54.240 --> 01:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>because it comes up from the equator.</v>

01:15:56.720 --> 01:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's basically there's a giant climate battery, as it were, that</v>

01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just makes sure that certain parts of the earth are hospitable when</v>

01:16:05.200 --> 01:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they would not otherwise be.</v>

01:16:06.880 --> 01:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And so a good example of that is that continental Europe is</v>

01:16:11.440 --> 01:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>much more temperate than you would think it would be if you</v>

01:16:13.920 --> 01:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just looked at the latitude.</v>

01:16:16.400 --> 01:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is basically the jet stream.</v>

01:16:19.760 --> 01:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's just how God designed the planet and how</v>

01:16:22.320 --> 01:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>things work.</v>

01:16:26.160 --> 01:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>If I missed any questions, I will try to get to them</v>

01:16:31.680 --> 01:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>next time.</v>

01:16:32.240 --> 01:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>If I don't add your question to my ongoing list of questions</v>

01:16:37.200 --> 01:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to answer in the future, then excuse me, please let me know</v>

01:16:41.440 --> 01:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so that I will add it to that.</v>

01:16:43.680 --> 01:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>That can be found on the website.</v>

01:16:45.440 --> 01:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You can go to the website that's in the description of any</v>

01:16:49.280 --> 01:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of these videos.</v>

01:16:50.320 --> 01:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the best way to submit the questions because I go to</v>

01:16:53.440 --> 01:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those questions first, and then I know that I have answered them</v>

01:16:56.720 --> 01:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>or not answered them, I can mark them as answered as well.</v>

01:16:59.520 --> 01:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's the easiest way for other people to find these things</v>

01:17:02.080 --> 01:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future.</v>

01:17:03.200 --> 01:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you comment in the chat or on Telegram or X,</v>

01:17:08.080 --> 01:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I try to find those as well and amalgamate those, aggregate those</v>

01:17:12.880 --> 01:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into my thread.</v>

01:17:13.760 --> 01:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>But if I don't notice it, it won't be there.</v>

01:17:16.400 --> 01:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Please let me know.</v>

01:17:17.920 --> 01:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for those who submitted questions, and I'm glad that</v>

01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I was able to answer these questions this week, as every week</v>

01:17:25.360 --> 01:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so far, and I look forward to answering the questions for you</v>

01:17:29.440 --> 01:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>next week.</v>

01:17:30.160 --> 01:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday of course, so I try to do this on Thursdays,</v>

01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but often it winds up being Friday.</v>

01:17:35.120 --> 01:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So have a great weekend and go to church on Sunday.</v>

01:17:38.400 --> 01:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Until I see you all next week, may God bless you.</v>

01:17:41.200 --> 01:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Have a nice evening.</v>