WEBVTT

00:00:01.040 --> 00:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It is the 21st of August 2026.</v>

00:00:04.160 --> 00:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Corey J.</v>

00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Mahler, and this is at any cost.</v>

00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This is episode 39, a QA episode.</v>

00:00:11.920 --> 00:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And I do not believe that I have any housekeeping, so I</v>

00:00:15.600 --> 00:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>can get right into the questions this evening.</v>

00:00:20.400 --> 00:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>All the levels look good on my side, I will just check</v>

00:00:25.200 --> 00:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>very quickly before I actually get into the questions that YouTube has</v>

00:00:29.040 --> 00:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not disabled the comments like it did two weeks ago, which was</v>

00:00:33.360 --> 00:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a lovely feature on their part.</v>

00:00:38.800 --> 00:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it looks like comments should be working on YouTube and everywhere</v>

00:00:42.720 --> 00:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>else, so I don't know how you'd let me know, but try</v>

00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to let me know in the chat if they're not.</v>

00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, the first question I see the question about the</v>

00:00:52.480 --> 00:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>intro and outro music for Lutheran lectionary recordings.</v>

00:00:57.200 --> 00:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember off the top of my head, so I'll have</v>

00:00:59.120 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to check that one.</v>

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I will reply to that one after the show.</v>

00:01:02.880 --> 00:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But the first question for the actual stream is one that has</v>

00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>been pending for a little while and I've been putting it off</v>

00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to take a little longer to address, but it</v>

00:01:14.320 --> 00:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is very important considering the current state of things.</v>

00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And the question was originally about let me see if I can</v>

00:01:20.640 --> 00:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>find the actual wording here.</v>

00:01:23.440 --> 00:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Question one.</v>

00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>What role did the opium wars play in relations between the West</v>

00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and China China and how morally legitimate was the British involvement in</v>

00:01:32.800 --> 00:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>them. I'm actually going to expand this one because I I think</v>

00:01:38.160 --> 00:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a fair expansion, first, and second, it's not just the Opium</v>

00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Wars. You have to understand the Opium Wars and the Century of</v>

00:01:45.600 --> 00:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Humiliation, which is what they call it.</v>

00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of tells you some stuff to start off.</v>

00:01:50.800 --> 00:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But you have to understand that whole time period and the interaction</v>

00:01:55.600 --> 00:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of various players in order to understand the modern Chinese mindset with</v>

00:02:00.800 --> 00:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>regard to the West and there's a caveat, there's an asterisk there</v>

00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>next to West, and I'll get into that as well So the</v>

00:02:08.400 --> 00:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>major events will be the First Opium War, the Second Opium War,</v>

00:02:12.160 --> 00:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the Century of Humiliation, which basically spans those.</v>

00:02:17.440 --> 00:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So the Century of Humiliation is 1840 to 1949.</v>

00:02:21.120 --> 00:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>The first Opium War is nine is eighteen thirty nine to eighteen</v>

00:02:25.040 --> 00:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>forty two, and the second opium war is eighteen fifty six to</v>

00:02:28.160 --> 00:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty.</v>

00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the historical background basically you have to start by understanding, of course,</v>

00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the period of colonization, the spread particularly of the British Empire and</v>

00:02:41.760 --> 00:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>its trade, and at this point, the British own India.</v>

00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That's also important because obviously opium partly grown in India, particularly opium</v>

00:02:51.440 --> 00:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that would wind up in Britain.</v>

00:02:54.240 --> 00:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But the way that this starts off is you have a huge</v>

00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>demand in Britain and in the British Empire generally, for tea, for</v>

00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>porcelain, and for silk.</v>

00:03:06.480 --> 00:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, tea, porcelain, and silk are largely Chinese products.</v>

00:03:11.760 --> 00:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens, because this is also an era in which</v>

00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you're using gold and silver, right, as your currency.</v>

00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And so most of this trade was denominated in silver, so you</v>

00:03:22.160 --> 00:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>had huge outflows of silver from the British Empire into China.</v>

00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>The British obviously don't like this because in a time of hard</v>

00:03:31.920 --> 00:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>currency, how much currency you have is actually physically limited.</v>

00:03:35.280 --> 00:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They can't do anything really to generate more except physically mine it</v>

00:03:39.600 --> 00:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere and turn it into currency.</v>

00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is a problem for the British.</v>

00:03:44.080 --> 00:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The British decide to solve this by taking Indian, largely Indian opium,</v>

00:03:51.040 --> 00:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and shipping it into China.</v>

00:03:53.200 --> 00:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>What actually happened was it was so successful that the outflow of</v>

00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>silver reversed, and so you actually had a positive inflow for the</v>

00:04:01.920 --> 00:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>British and a negative outflow from the Chinese.</v>

00:04:05.360 --> 00:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Now the Chinese of course objected for a number of reasons here.</v>

00:04:09.200 --> 00:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Not just because they were losing all their silver.</v>

00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge part of it.</v>

00:04:13.200 --> 00:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this gets cast into moral and other terms, but</v>

00:04:18.080 --> 00:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, a lot of it was about</v>

00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really two things.</v>

00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Sovereignty, which in the Asian sense also includes not losing face, and</v>

00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>money. Hard currency.</v>

00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, a Chinese commissioner, my Chinese is not good,</v>

00:04:33.600 --> 00:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so if I mispronounce some names, it's just what it is.</v>

00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>My Chinese isn't I have very limited Chinese.</v>

00:04:38.720 --> 00:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So Lin Zeksu objected to this.</v>

00:04:40.880 --> 00:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He destroyed about twenty thousand chests of opium.</v>

00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot of money.</v>

00:04:45.600 --> 00:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge amount of opium.</v>

00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And technically speaking, under international law, that is an act of war.</v>

00:04:52.480 --> 00:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So the British were not entirely out of line in doing what</v>

00:04:55.280 --> 00:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they did, which was declare war.</v>

00:04:57.520 --> 00:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>This was the start of the first opium War.</v>

00:05:00.640 --> 00:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>The British won decisively, as is the case for basically every single</v>

00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>conflict up until that nineteen forty nine demarcation of the end of</v>

00:05:11.120 --> 00:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the century of humiliation, basically the Western powers just trounced China in</v>

00:05:16.080 --> 00:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>every single engagement.</v>

00:05:17.760 --> 00:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>This leads to the Treaty of Nanjing, which is what ceded Hong</v>

00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Kong, so you can see how that set up what has happened</v>

00:05:25.040 --> 00:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in recent years.</v>

00:05:26.400 --> 00:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>That was in perpetuity, and then it opened five treaty ports.</v>

00:05:30.960 --> 00:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>These were ports where Western powers this eventually expanded to additional nations,</v>

00:05:35.280 --> 00:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not just the British.</v>

00:05:36.320 --> 00:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But this was basically free trade ports where the Western powers could</v>

00:05:40.320 --> 00:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>trade with China on favorable terms, in fact on most favored nation's</v>

00:05:45.120 --> 00:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>status, which is a technical sense.</v>

00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>It just means that the nation that has MFN status is treated</v>

00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at least as well as whichever nation is treated best.</v>

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>This crops up all the time in it.</v>

00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>This is still a thing in modern international law.</v>

00:06:00.720 --> 00:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>China also had to pay a large indemnity for the for the</v>

00:06:04.160 --> 00:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>war, for the conflict, and British and other European citizens were granted</v>

00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what is called extraterritoriality, which means they're not subject to the law</v>

00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of the nation in which they're residing, in this case China, but</v>

00:06:17.600 --> 00:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to the laws of their home nation.</v>

00:06:19.680 --> 00:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So British subjects could only be subjected to criminal penalties, whatever it</v>

00:06:23.760 --> 00:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>happened to be, under British law, not under Chinese law.</v>

00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>This of course did not make the Chinese happy, and then we</v>

00:06:31.200 --> 00:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have the second opium war, which starts with the Brit the Chinese</v>

00:06:34.480 --> 00:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a similar thing, this time they seize a vessel that is</v>

00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>shipping opium, arrests the Chinese crew and some British, and refuse to</v>

00:06:42.320 --> 00:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>return all of it, and they eventually return some but not all</v>

00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of it.</v>

00:06:47.200 --> 00:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>This leads to the second Opium War.</v>

00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Cassus Belly, the sort of spark that starts it.</v>

00:06:55.920 --> 00:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course China loses again.</v>

00:06:58.080 --> 00:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You have additional territory that is ceded, you have various other treaty</v>

00:07:02.800 --> 00:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>provisions similar to the first one, one of which is an imposition</v>

00:07:07.200 --> 00:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of</v>

00:07:08.480 --> 00:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not the modern sort of freedom of religion, but something akin to</v>

00:07:13.520 --> 00:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it in the same sort of family.</v>

00:07:16.080 --> 00:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Christians and others were allowed to evangelize And to practice their faith,</v>

00:07:21.440 --> 00:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>which is something that had been suppressed here and there, not necessarily</v>

00:07:25.840 --> 00:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>consistently, but had been suppressed by the Chinese.</v>

00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>This plays into something later that's important, that's why it's noted here.</v>

00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Instead of all the provisions of the treaty, that one's important to</v>

00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>bear in mind.</v>

00:07:37.920 --> 00:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So, subsequent to this, you have essentially what is the equivalent in</v>

00:07:43.040 --> 00:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Asia of the rush for Africa.</v>

00:07:45.280 --> 00:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>You have the carving out of spheres of influence by various European</v>

00:07:48.800 --> 00:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>powers, really about six or eight main players, and largely building railroads,</v>

00:07:54.080 --> 00:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in their spheres of influence over which they exercise not just</v>

00:07:57.840 --> 00:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>control but ownership.</v>

00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Child China, of course, objects to this.</v>

00:08:02.880 --> 00:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>This is part of what leads to what is called the Boxer</v>

00:08:05.920 --> 00:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Rebellion. This is a major rebellion of the Chinese, both against some</v>

00:08:11.840 --> 00:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese domestically and against the European powers.</v>

00:08:15.440 --> 00:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You have eight European powers that come together and completely crush the</v>

00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese. it's not even close.</v>

00:08:23.520 --> 00:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Jumping ahead a little bit, and I should note before we do</v>

00:08:27.440 --> 00:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that, the Boxer Rebellion, why I said the freedom of religion thing</v>

00:08:30.640 --> 00:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>was important, the Boxer Rebellion was also a domestic anti-Christian pogrom.</v>

00:08:35.920 --> 00:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>They killed probably thirty to thirty-five thousand Chinese Christians.</v>

00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That was part of the argument for</v>

00:08:43.520 --> 00:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that particular rebellion.</v>

00:08:44.960 --> 00:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>There were also some weird eschatological claims and things, but it was</v>

00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>largely anti-Christian and anti-Western.</v>

00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Jumping ahead a little bit, you come to World War I.</v>

00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that World War I matters is that one of</v>

00:08:58.080 --> 00:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles was that Shandong, the German</v>

00:09:03.600 --> 00:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sphere of influence in China, was transferred from Germany as punishment of</v>

00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Germany, to the Japanese.</v>

00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This leads to obviously increasing there was already plenty of it, but</v>

00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>increasing hostility Toward the Japanese.</v>

00:09:17.760 --> 00:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is that caveat I mentioned in the beginning.</v>

00:09:20.800 --> 00:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to recognize when the Chinese speak of the West, they</v>

00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>don't just mean, you know, white guys.</v>

00:09:26.880 --> 00:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't just mean Europeans.</v>

00:09:28.400 --> 00:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They include the Japanese in that.</v>

00:09:30.400 --> 00:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>In their conception, Japan is part of this cabal that has suppressed</v>

00:09:36.480 --> 00:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know destroyed China.</v>

00:09:39.680 --> 00:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They even go as far as to say there's destruction of Chinese</v>

00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>cultural heritage and things like that.</v>

00:09:44.320 --> 00:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They include Japan.</v>

00:09:45.760 --> 00:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So recognize that animosity is there, not just for us, but also</v>

00:09:49.920 --> 00:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for Japan.</v>

00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And then of course this is further exacerbated by the Chinese invasion</v>

00:09:55.520 --> 00:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and occupation occupation initially of Manchuria and then of more of China</v>

00:10:00.080 --> 00:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in 1937, lasting until 1945.</v>

00:10:04.160 --> 00:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Then of course you have that four-year period before the Chinese take</v>

00:10:07.360 --> 00:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>over the Chinese Communists, which is the nationalists versus the communists, it's</v>

00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Civil War.</v>

00:10:12.560 --> 00:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But to give you some numbers so you can kind of place</v>

00:10:16.320 --> 00:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>these things in perspective and understand that the Chinese overplay and they</v>

00:10:19.600 --> 00:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>overstate what has actually happened, what has happened historically.</v>

00:10:22.880 --> 00:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And I recognize there's a little bit of sun there, I need</v>

00:10:25.040 --> 00:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to put up a a curtain at some point.</v>

00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But the first opium war.</v>

00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen to twenty thousand Chinese die, right?</v>

00:10:33.200 --> 00:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Six hundred ish British casualties, that's including only a handful, a handful,</v>

00:10:39.760 --> 00:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a dozen died as a result of actual fighting.</v>

00:10:43.440 --> 00:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Disease got the rest.</v>

00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Pretty standard down through war, even up until modern times.</v>

00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The second opium war, twenty to thirty thousand Chinese died.</v>

00:10:52.880 --> 00:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Several hundred British and the French were involved this time, so that's</v>

00:10:55.760 --> 00:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>British and French casualties.</v>

00:10:57.440 --> 00:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So again, massively one-sided in terms of losses.</v>

00:11:01.520 --> 00:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Boxer Rebellion.</v>

00:11:02.960 --> 00:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>A hundred thousand Chinese die.</v>

00:11:04.560 --> 00:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>That's including the thirty to thirty five thousand Christians who were killed.</v>

00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So you could probably subtract that from the total because they weren't</v>

00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>really fighting on the Chinese side.</v>

00:11:13.520 --> 00:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's where the numbers start to get important, because you have to</v>

00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>understand how much they overemphas emphasize the Western conflicts and their cost</v>

00:11:22.480 --> 00:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>versus downplaying what happened in their own history So the Taiping Rebellion,</v>

00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which was another domestic issue that China had, 20 to 30 million</v>

00:11:32.960 --> 00:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>died in that.</v>

00:11:34.800 --> 00:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Some estimates are as high as 60 to 80 million, but it's</v>

00:11:38.400 --> 00:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at least around 2530, say, is a conservative estimate, very supported by</v>

00:11:43.040 --> 00:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the historical facts.</v>

00:11:44.560 --> 00:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese invasion was 15 to 20 million, you can see why</v>

00:11:47.840 --> 00:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they are still angry about that.</v>

00:11:49.840 --> 00:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese Civil War was at least five million.</v>

00:11:53.520 --> 00:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>That was the nationalist versus the communist.</v>

00:11:55.760 --> 00:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Could have been significantly more.</v>

00:11:57.920 --> 00:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The records aren't very good for obvious reasons.</v>

00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The communists won.</v>

00:12:01.840 --> 00:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So hard to tell.</v>

00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Great leap forward, as best as we can tell, killed tens of</v>

00:12:07.040 --> 00:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>millions. That was just a communist domestic policy.</v>

00:12:10.320 --> 00:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the so-called Cultural Revolution killed several million as well.</v>

00:12:14.960 --> 00:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So pick any of the actions domestically of the Chinese against themselves,</v>

00:12:21.280 --> 00:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>more Chinese died in those than all of the Western actions combined,</v>

00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>by an order of magnitude at least.</v>

00:12:30.080 --> 00:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But</v>

00:12:31.680 --> 00:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this leads into the modern Chinese view of the West.</v>

00:12:36.160 --> 00:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It is basically formed it because this is the propaganda that is</v>

00:12:40.640 --> 00:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>taught in all of their schools.</v>

00:12:42.880 --> 00:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>All of the Chinese are raised on this as their education.</v>

00:12:46.880 --> 00:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And so they view the West through this lens.</v>

00:12:50.640 --> 00:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Because again, this is a mandatory part of Chinese education.</v>

00:12:54.240 --> 00:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you, for instance, have Western powers criticizing human rights violations</v>

00:13:00.320 --> 00:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese communists and things like that, it is always from</v>

00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese perspective viewed as a continuation of this policy of the</v>

00:13:08.400 --> 00:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>West</v>

00:13:09.520 --> 00:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of suppressing the Chinese, turning them into vassals, etcetera.</v>

00:13:14.400 --> 00:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's never viewed as being genuine, it's always viewed as being mercenary,</v>

00:13:18.560 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which is part of why it's not ever effective, right?</v>

00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They view it purely as something where the West is trying to</v>

00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>again impose a new century of humiliation on China.</v>

00:13:29.280 --> 00:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That's always their concern, and I'll get into that near the end</v>

00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of my remarks on this.</v>

00:13:35.040 --> 00:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese are also taught that only the CCP, the Chinese Communist</v>

00:13:40.800 --> 00:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Party, saved China.</v>

00:13:42.400 --> 00:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They're taught that the Chinese were stood up again, that they were</v>

00:13:46.080 --> 00:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>again part of the great powers as it were, due to the</v>

00:13:50.800 --> 00:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>actions of the communists and nothing else.</v>

00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Some irony in this, of course, because the majority of the reason</v>

00:13:58.400 --> 00:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese were expelled from China is one, they were losing against</v>

00:14:03.600 --> 00:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States in the Pacific Theater, and two, the nationalists in</v>

00:14:07.840 --> 00:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>China were actually fighting against them and having some success.</v>

00:14:11.920 --> 00:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The communists weren't.</v>

00:14:13.280 --> 00:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So the communists claim credit for what the nationalists in China actually</v>

00:14:17.520 --> 00:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>did. But their real concern is that past humiliation and not repeating</v>

00:14:23.680 --> 00:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that. That is, you know, losing face, big thing in Asian politics.</v>

00:14:28.880 --> 00:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>There is a similarity here, you will notice, and perhaps you'll notice</v>

00:14:33.280 --> 00:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it even better if I point out that one of essentially not</v>

00:14:36.480 --> 00:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily word-for-word their maxim, but a sort of mindset they have is</v>

00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>never again.</v>

00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>They believe that this should never again happen to them, and where</v>

00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>have you heard that before, right?</v>

00:14:49.920 --> 00:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, with the Jews and the Holocaust.</v>

00:14:52.080 --> 00:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Very similar mindset going on here.</v>

00:14:54.080 --> 00:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You have this propagandized version of history that is then used as</v>

00:14:59.120 --> 00:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>warrant to hate the West, and particularly also to hate Christians, incidentally</v>

00:15:03.280 --> 00:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in both cases, and the slogan is never again.</v>

00:15:06.720 --> 00:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a similarity there.</v>

00:15:07.760 --> 00:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese have a little more historical warrant, certainly, than the Jews,</v>

00:15:11.440 --> 00:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but they still overemphasize it in a way that's certainly impermissible.</v>

00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, some criticisms of</v>

00:15:20.320 --> 00:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>some additional, I guess, criticisms, of this view of the Chinese that</v>

00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they advance, they teach in their schools, their propaganda.</v>

00:15:26.960 --> 00:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>One, there's no such thing as China as a nation.</v>

00:15:30.800 --> 00:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>China is an empire.</v>

00:15:32.560 --> 00:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>China has 56 ethnic group recognized ethnic groups.</v>

00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>This is officially recognized by the Chinese Communist Party.</v>

00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>One is the Han Chinese, one is the Manchu.</v>

00:15:43.920 --> 00:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The Manchu are important because they are actually the ethnicity that was</v>

00:15:48.880 --> 00:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>largely the source of the Qing dynasty.</v>

00:15:51.440 --> 00:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The Qing Dynasty spelled with a Q is the one that was</v>

00:15:55.680 --> 00:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in charge during both of the Opium Wars, the one that is</v>

00:15:58.960 --> 00:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes blamed by the Chinese Communist Party for being weak, not modernizing</v>

00:16:04.400 --> 00:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fast enough, not responding quickly enough, etcetera So they</v>

00:16:11.360 --> 00:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>are sort of they're an important player, but they're monshu, they're not</v>

00:16:15.120 --> 00:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Han, right?</v>

00:16:15.920 --> 00:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese Communist Party is largely Han Chinese, although the Han Chinese</v>

00:16:20.880 --> 00:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are actually reproducing more slowly than all of These minority groups, ethnic</v>

00:16:25.040 --> 00:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>groups in China, so they're slowly losing power, but that will also</v>

00:16:28.800 --> 00:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>play into how they're going to behave domestically, of course.</v>

00:16:32.880 --> 00:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The disputed territories, one of the other reasons the Qing dynasty is</v>

00:16:36.240 --> 00:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>important, the disputed territories, so Hong Kong in particular, Taiwan certainly.</v>

00:16:41.920 --> 00:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>These are areas that were actually conquered by the Qing.</v>

00:16:45.120 --> 00:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>They were relatively recently conquered and became part of the Chinese Empire.</v>

00:16:49.680 --> 00:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>There's some history there, it's complicated in some cases, but they're not</v>

00:16:54.240 --> 00:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Han Chinese, right?</v>

00:16:55.360 --> 00:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not like uppercase C Chinese.</v>

00:16:58.400 --> 00:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But the Chinese view them that way.</v>

00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a big part of their mentality because they view, for</v>

00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>instance, Taiwan as the outstanding one, right?</v>

00:17:07.120 --> 00:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>They got Hong Kong back.</v>

00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan's outstanding.</v>

00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Every day that Taiwan remains not part of China in their conception</v>

00:17:15.920 --> 00:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of it is an assault on them.</v>

00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It's an affront to them, they're losing face because they don't have</v>

00:17:22.160 --> 00:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this territory they view as being rightfully theirs.</v>

00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And so they will eventually move to retake that.</v>

00:17:27.680 --> 00:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The question is how exactly they'll do it.</v>

00:17:30.400 --> 00:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Usually the Chinese, in this case, are relatively rational actors, so if</v>

00:17:35.360 --> 00:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they can retake it through referenda and through political means they would</v>

00:17:39.200 --> 00:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>prefer to do that to war, but they could also take Taiwan</v>

00:17:41.760 --> 00:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in about a day if they day if they really wanted to.</v>

00:17:47.600 --> 00:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Another fact that is ignored in the historical narrative that's very important.</v>

00:17:52.160 --> 00:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>China had been producing and consuming opium for over a century before</v>

00:17:57.040 --> 00:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the British got involved.</v>

00:17:58.880 --> 00:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So in their propaganda, they basically say that the British introduced opium</v>

00:18:03.840 --> 00:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Chinese, which is just a lie.</v>

00:18:05.840 --> 00:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It's flat out wrong.</v>

00:18:07.600 --> 00:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Because literally for a century, they had actually been importing a bunch</v>

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of it from neighboring countries, and they had sort of the same</v>

00:18:15.040 --> 00:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>problem that the British had with regard to tea.</v>

00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>They hated how much they were spending on this, the outflow of</v>

00:18:20.320 --> 00:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>capital, and so, in this case, hard currency.</v>

00:18:23.520 --> 00:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And so what they actually did was they started to produce it</v>

00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>domestically. Their domestic production had actually exceeded their imports at the point</v>

00:18:31.760 --> 00:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>where the British got involved.</v>

00:18:33.760 --> 00:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So did the British exacerbate an existing problem?</v>

00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely yes.</v>

00:18:39.520 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Did they introduce the Chinese to opium?</v>

00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely no.</v>

00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And then beyond that, just I would emphasize again the fact that</v>

00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese are viewed as part of the West.</v>

00:18:51.360 --> 00:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's not going to come naturally to your mind, perhaps, but</v>

00:18:54.880 --> 00:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bear that in mind when the topic of China comes up, because</v>

00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they think of sort of a solid anti-Chinese bloc, including Japan.</v>

00:19:04.320 --> 00:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>But then to answer the other part of the question, that's sort</v>

00:19:07.440 --> 00:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of the outline of how we got to where we are and</v>

00:19:10.960 --> 00:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>how you have the Chinese view of the West of the West</v>

00:19:13.920 --> 00:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in light of these things.</v>

00:19:15.840 --> 00:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But then the actual second part of the question asked by the</v>

00:19:19.120 --> 00:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>questioner, was it moral for the British to be involved in this</v>

00:19:23.200 --> 00:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>way? I think they exceeded their moral warrant.</v>

00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Was it fine to impose colonialism and then to allow evangelization of</v>

00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Christianity and things like that?</v>

00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's fine.</v>

00:19:36.000 --> 00:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Was it fine to balance your budget by getting more of the</v>

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese addicted to a hard drug?</v>

00:19:41.520 --> 00:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty easy to say no.</v>

00:19:43.600 --> 00:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They should not have done that.</v>

00:19:45.120 --> 00:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>They should have found some other way to balance that trade imbalance</v>

00:19:48.880 --> 00:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with regard to tea, porcelain, and silk instead of just getting a</v>

00:19:53.360 --> 00:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch more of the Chinese addicted to opium.</v>

00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, the Chinese, of course, blow this again vastly out of proportion</v>

00:20:00.880 --> 00:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>because they lie about numbers, they downplay their own internal politics, they</v>

00:20:05.760 --> 00:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>downplay so many different things, many of which I went over, and</v>

00:20:10.880 --> 00:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>then they</v>

00:20:13.120 --> 00:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Really just it's not even exaggerating.</v>

00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It's they just outright lie about what happened with regard to Western</v>

00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>involvement in China.</v>

00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But it has become the founding myth of the CCP.</v>

00:20:25.360 --> 00:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The CCP makes claims about continuity with the Qing and previous dynasties,</v>

00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>complete nonsense.</v>

00:20:31.920 --> 00:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It sort of claims to have the mandate of heaven.</v>

00:20:36.320 --> 00:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kinda squirrely with whether or not it has that, but the</v>

00:20:39.520 --> 00:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>problem is the common people, particularly in the hinterlands, view the CCP</v>

00:20:43.600 --> 00:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>as having the mandate of heaven and being tied to economic prosperity.</v>

00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that d partially drives their psychology and their policies because</v>

00:20:52.880 --> 00:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if they lose that prosperity, they will be perceived as having lost</v>

00:20:56.640 --> 00:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the mandate of heaven, and that always leads to rebellion in China's</v>

00:21:00.960 --> 00:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>history, and usually tens of millions dead, depending on the era.</v>

00:21:06.640 --> 00:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is that the modern view of the West that's</v>

00:21:09.920 --> 00:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>held by China is formed by the Opium Wars and the Century</v>

00:21:14.240 --> 00:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of Humiliation, and the conception of the West as including Japan and</v>

00:21:19.440 --> 00:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>being anti-China.</v>

00:21:21.920 --> 00:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And their big complaints.</v>

00:21:24.080 --> 00:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>In essence, they have four big complaints.</v>

00:21:27.360 --> 00:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And with what I just gave you, you can judge whether or</v>

00:21:30.080 --> 00:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not these are legitimate complaints.</v>

00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>They argue that drugs and moral degradation were introduced to China by</v>

00:21:36.480 --> 00:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the West.</v>

00:21:37.520 --> 00:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They argue that the unequal treaties that were imposed on China were</v>

00:21:42.800 --> 00:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>onerous and an insult.</v>

00:21:45.440 --> 00:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>They argue territory that was rightfully Chinese was amputated by the West,</v>

00:21:51.120 --> 00:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so Hong Kong, Taiwan, Kowloon attached to Hong Kong, a couple other</v>

00:21:56.080 --> 00:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>places. And they argue there was cultural destruction</v>

00:22:00.880 --> 00:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, were some cultural relics destroyed in the course of the wars?</v>

00:22:05.440 --> 00:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes. The old, I think it was called the old summer palace</v>

00:22:09.200 --> 00:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was destroyed during the second opium war, I believe it was, and</v>

00:22:13.760 --> 00:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there were some volumes of an encyclopedia that were destroyed in Beijing</v>

00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that city being conquered and occupied.</v>

00:22:23.200 --> 00:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So yes, were some things destroyed?</v>

00:22:25.360 --> 00:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it happens in war.</v>

00:22:27.120 --> 00:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Was there a deliberate program by the West to destroy Chinese culture?</v>

00:22:32.080 --> 00:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence of that.</v>

00:22:34.000 --> 00:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's the Chinese mindset, the reality is not really identical to</v>

00:22:39.280 --> 00:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what they believe.</v>

00:22:40.480 --> 00:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately that doesn't matter, because this is what they're taught, this</v>

00:22:44.320 --> 00:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is what they believe with regard to the w to the West,</v>

00:22:47.200 --> 00:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, and this is how they view the world.</v>

00:22:49.920 --> 00:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So if this is how they view the world, they're going to</v>

00:22:53.040 --> 00:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>behave according to this worldview.</v>

00:22:55.840 --> 00:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So were the British wrong to push opium?</v>

00:22:58.720 --> 00:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you should not push hard drugs because they're bad, right?</v>

00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>As a Christian, you shouldn't want people to be addicted to hard</v>

00:23:06.080 --> 00:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>drugs. But</v>

00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those means that you really probably should not use.</v>

00:23:14.000 --> 00:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>If it's an active war, maybe there are some caveats there, but</v>

00:23:17.040 --> 00:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this was not an active war, right?</v>

00:23:19.280 --> 00:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>This was a trade imbalance.</v>

00:23:21.200 --> 00:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>They should have handled it in a different way.</v>

00:23:23.760 --> 00:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But that is what has set the stage for how China views</v>

00:23:27.520 --> 00:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the West and how they view the world and how they will</v>

00:23:29.920 --> 00:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to interact with us.</v>

00:23:31.920 --> 00:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Because it's what they taught and what it's they actually believe it.</v>

00:23:35.440 --> 00:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And I I guess I should have prefaced it by saying this</v>

00:23:41.040 --> 00:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of thing where you could teach an entire year</v>

00:23:43.360 --> 00:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of a graduate seminary on this era in Chinese history and all</v>

00:23:48.080 --> 00:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the intricacies and the intrigue and the involvement of the different</v>

00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>European players, but that will at least give you an overview of</v>

00:23:56.880 --> 00:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it that gives you a functioning view of how this happened and</v>

00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>an accurate one so you can sort of gauge how China's behaving</v>

00:24:05.280 --> 00:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on the world stage and how people are behaving in relation to</v>

00:24:07.600 --> 00:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>China. In fact if you remember</v>

00:24:11.760 --> 00:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the the core of my answer though, you will be better informed</v>

00:24:15.360 --> 00:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on China than most of our politicians, which is another problem.</v>

00:24:22.080 --> 00:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Question two 2</v>

00:24:25.600 --> 00:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>The godly pursuit of this life or pursuits of this life I</v>

00:24:30.560 --> 00:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>wrestle to find the proper line between fighting to win here and</v>

00:24:34.080 --> 00:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>now and being prepared to face the end of our race.</v>

00:24:37.360 --> 00:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Looking at Hitler's righteous cause I struggle with why God allowed the</v>

00:24:40.800 --> 00:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wicked to win.</v>

00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>If God moves us to a similar response, how should we hold</v>

00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of failing in our hearts without doubting God or defecting</v>

00:24:49.600 --> 00:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>from this righteous cause.</v>

00:24:52.960 --> 00:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So I would say read Job.</v>

00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That is always going to be part of my answer when it</v>

00:24:59.040 --> 00:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to something like this.</v>

00:25:00.640 --> 00:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also read certain parts of history, right?</v>

00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>North Africa used to be European, that fell away.</v>

00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>There were many Christians in the Middle East, and they were killed</v>

00:25:10.240 --> 00:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly by the Jews.</v>

00:25:12.320 --> 00:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Just because you are faithful and righteous does not mean that you</v>

00:25:16.080 --> 00:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>will win in this life.</v>

00:25:17.520 --> 00:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not how it works.</v>

00:25:19.120 --> 00:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Because we live in an evil and fallen world, and sometimes the</v>

00:25:22.400 --> 00:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>wicked win.</v>

00:25:23.920 --> 00:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So winning a war is is not necessarily intimately linked to</v>

00:25:30.960 --> 00:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>being faithful to God.</v>

00:25:32.800 --> 00:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Winning a war is a matter of being capable of winning a</v>

00:25:35.760 --> 00:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>war, and we should bear these things in mind given where the</v>

00:25:38.720 --> 00:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>country is currently headed and the West is currently headed.</v>

00:25:41.760 --> 00:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think that God will not let us fail.</v>

00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that He can't, because He made promises to Japheth.</v>

00:25:49.520 --> 00:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We are the sons and daughters of Japheth.</v>

00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Those promises did not have a termination date.</v>

00:25:55.520 --> 00:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And so he can't let all of us pass away unless is</v>

00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>unless this is the actual end times, in which case everything passes</v>

00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>away. I don't think it necessarily is yet, and so God is</v>

00:26:06.800 --> 00:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>bound by the things he has promised, and so I do believe</v>

00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that we will win.</v>

00:26:11.360 --> 00:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We're really fighting over the contours, the nature of that win, and</v>

00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer it to be the best win we can obtain</v>

00:26:19.760 --> 00:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of just barely squeaking by.</v>

00:26:23.040 --> 00:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that despair is ever the right mindset.</v>

00:26:27.760 --> 00:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately Christians win, regardless, right?</v>

00:26:30.640 --> 00:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that some people hate that answer, it's true, but I</v>

00:26:33.200 --> 00:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>always add it with the caveat that we should still endeavor to</v>

00:26:36.080 --> 00:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>win here in time as well.</v>

00:26:38.400 --> 00:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it is not the Christian approach to abandon the here and</v>

00:26:42.000 --> 00:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>now just because we win ultimately in the Eschaton, right?</v>

00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not an appropriate way to look at it.</v>

00:26:48.560 --> 00:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:26:50.160 --> 00:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, live your everyday life, but also with the the orientation</v>

00:26:56.160 --> 00:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>toward where things are going, the reality of the times in which</v>

00:27:00.080 --> 00:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we live and what will need to be done in the not</v>

00:27:03.680 --> 00:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>so distant future in order to secure a victory that's worth having.</v>

00:27:08.160 --> 00:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I would also add that you should listen to the episode</v>

00:27:13.920 --> 00:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on normalcy bias from Stone Choir because we really touch on this</v>

00:27:18.640 --> 00:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>exact topic in that one.</v>

00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would say go and listen to that one again.</v>

00:27:22.560 --> 00:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll add that into the show notes.</v>

00:27:24.080 --> 00:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I made a note for myself Myself.</v>

00:27:29.600 --> 00:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Question three</v>

00:27:33.040 --> 00:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Genetic relation between random whites and a mixed couple with a mixed</v>

00:27:37.200 --> 00:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>child. Could you explain how a white father with a child born</v>

00:27:41.680 --> 00:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>from a marriage to a black woman is more genetically related to</v>

00:27:44.560 --> 00:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>any random white man than his own child?</v>

00:27:47.520 --> 00:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the child is fifty percent his, but what else is creating</v>

00:27:50.880 --> 00:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this distance between him and his child?</v>

00:27:55.040 --> 00:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So the way that this works without delving necessarily too deeply into</v>

00:27:59.120 --> 00:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>genetics right now, is</v>

00:28:02.880 --> 00:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>genetically speaking, a race is sort of a more or less fixed</v>

00:28:08.960 --> 00:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>set of genetics, of inheritable characteristics.</v>

00:28:14.560 --> 00:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, genetics, your genome, your phenotype is the expression of</v>

00:28:18.880 --> 00:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that. And so whites are phenotypically white because we have the genetics</v>

00:28:22.480 --> 00:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to produce the various things that make us fair skinned.</v>

00:28:26.800 --> 00:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You share a huge chunk of your DNA with everyone else in</v>

00:28:32.080 --> 00:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your race.</v>

00:28:32.800 --> 00:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>You share a huge chunk with everyone else who's a human being,</v>

00:28:36.480 --> 00:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but it is above and beyond that baseline, whatever 90% it is.</v>

00:28:41.440 --> 00:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That you share with humanity generally, that you share with your race.</v>

00:28:45.840 --> 00:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>If you then have a child with someone from another race, any</v>

00:28:50.320 --> 00:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>random individual in your race will be more related to you because</v>

00:28:55.120 --> 00:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of that shared pool, as it were, of genetics that really is</v>

00:28:58.720 --> 00:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what is your race.</v>

00:29:00.800 --> 00:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Your child doesn't have that because he has it split between your</v>

00:29:04.800 --> 00:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>race and your wife's race.</v>

00:29:06.800 --> 00:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why you will be more related to a random person from</v>

00:29:10.800 --> 00:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>your own race than to your own child.</v>

00:29:13.440 --> 00:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, are you going to have 90 plus percent shared with your</v>

00:29:17.120 --> 00:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>child? Of course, because that's the case within a species, within the</v>

00:29:22.400 --> 00:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>species of humanity, human beings, right?</v>

00:29:26.000 --> 00:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're not talking about the percentage of the 100, because that's</v>

00:29:30.720 --> 00:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant, right?</v>

00:29:31.840 --> 00:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Because if all of humanity, let's just say for the sake of</v>

00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>argument, shares ninety percent, right?</v>

00:29:37.280 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Well the ninety percent isn't what differentiates me from every other member</v>

00:29:42.160 --> 00:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of my species.</v>

00:29:43.520 --> 00:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The ninety percent is shared, only the ten percent matters.</v>

00:29:46.720 --> 00:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And so And so if you're talking about, say, a two or</v>

00:29:49.200 --> 00:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>three percent difference between the races, that's huge because you're talking about</v>

00:29:53.920 --> 00:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>two or three percent of ten percent, not of a hundred percent.</v>

00:29:57.840 --> 00:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So you have to bear in mind what's being discussed, right?</v>

00:30:00.800 --> 00:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about, say, cross species, then that percentage is going</v>

00:30:05.520 --> 00:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to be wider.</v>

00:30:06.320 --> 00:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But even then, you share a significant percentage of your DNA with</v>

00:30:10.320 --> 00:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>dogs and cats and goats We're all mammals, right?</v>

00:30:14.480 --> 00:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We share that DNA.</v>

00:30:16.160 --> 00:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So we wouldn't say that you know it's the 100% of the</v>

00:30:20.320 --> 00:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>DNA that matters.</v>

00:30:21.760 --> 00:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's that differentiating percentage of human versus goat, or in this case,</v>

00:30:27.680 --> 00:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the different races of men.</v>

00:30:29.440 --> 00:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you are going to be more closely related, genetically</v>

00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking, to a random member of your own race than to your</v>

00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>own child if you marry particularly someone who is of a distant</v>

00:30:40.480 --> 00:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>race like white versus black.</v>

00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, you know, if you're talking about, say, English and Russian, much</v>

00:30:48.080 --> 00:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>less of an issue because already significantly more overlap in total as</v>

00:30:53.600 --> 00:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to between whites and blacks, which are about as distant as</v>

00:30:56.400 --> 00:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you can get.</v>

00:30:57.520 --> 00:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>There's also a very good chart going around that shows the different</v>

00:31:02.560 --> 00:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>human races mapped onto a graph, and so it will show you</v>

00:31:06.640 --> 00:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the distance between, say, whites and Africans, which is basically the biggest</v>

00:31:10.000 --> 00:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you can get, and then also where your child would fall if</v>

00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you married someone from that other race.</v>

00:31:16.400 --> 00:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the genetic distance.</v>

00:31:18.880 --> 00:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>The little circle that is your race, everyone who's a member of</v>

00:31:22.480 --> 00:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>your race is within that.</v>

00:31:24.080 --> 00:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're much closer to them than to your own child if</v>

00:31:27.600 --> 00:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you marry someone way over here.</v>

00:31:29.680 --> 00:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe someone can find and share that image.</v>

00:31:32.320 --> 00:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I have it saved, but there are plenty</v>

00:31:35.280 --> 00:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of ways you can generate this.</v>

00:31:36.640 --> 00:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>FST is one of the standard measures of genetic distance between individuals</v>

00:31:41.680 --> 00:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or populations.</v>

00:31:44.480 --> 00:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's how you can be more distant from your own child</v>

00:31:47.760 --> 00:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>genetically than from your neighbor.</v>

00:31:51.280 --> 00:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>As assuming your neighbor is as he should be your own race.</v>

00:31:56.320 --> 00:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Question four.</v>

00:31:58.560 --> 00:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I currently reside in a state that has poor demographics.</v>

00:32:01.920 --> 00:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I find having to deal with these people on a daily basis</v>

00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to be very tiresome, and I can't help but feel as though</v>

00:32:07.520 --> 00:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the poor demographics have made it more difficult for me to find</v>

00:32:10.320 --> 00:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a suitable wife.</v>

00:32:11.600 --> 00:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely true.</v>

00:32:13.360 --> 00:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Would you recommend moving to Tennessee?</v>

00:32:15.360 --> 00:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you enjoy living there?</v>

00:32:16.640 --> 00:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>A part of me wants to move to the Midwest, the land</v>

00:32:19.120 --> 00:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of my ancestors, but the particular state from which my family hails</v>

00:32:22.960 --> 00:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>has very high taxes.</v>

00:32:26.400 --> 00:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So we definitely address this in a number of episodes of Stone</v>

00:32:30.960 --> 00:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Choir, and the general rule is that it's best to stay around</v>

00:32:34.240 --> 00:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>family where your family is your family has lived for a long</v>

00:32:36.720 --> 00:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>time. But that being said, there are times where wisdom dictates you</v>

00:32:42.480 --> 00:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>should move.</v>

00:32:43.600 --> 00:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Because there are so many problems where you are and it's trending</v>

00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so rapidly in the wrong direction</v>

00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can do nothing about it except leave.</v>

00:32:54.800 --> 00:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it can be fixed in the future, but that is a</v>

00:32:57.360 --> 00:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>greater undertaking than an individual.</v>

00:32:59.280 --> 00:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So wisdom sometimes will say Will say you need to move.</v>

00:33:02.880 --> 00:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're in a particular state, I don't know which state you</v>

00:33:05.520 --> 00:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>reside. I can guess at which Midwest states, given the high tax</v>

00:33:09.520 --> 00:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>issue, although they're all not particularly low tax these days.</v>

00:33:14.080 --> 00:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say move where you have family or some connections so</v>

00:33:19.280 --> 00:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get back on your feet quickly, you have a job,</v>

00:33:23.360 --> 00:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a way to provide yourself, you have a community around</v>

00:33:26.320 --> 00:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you, and go from there.</v>

00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Things are going to change a lot in the next ten, fifteen,</v>

00:33:33.120 --> 00:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, so you're not really planning for the next five hundred</v>

00:33:38.160 --> 00:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>years right now, you're planning to survive what's coming.</v>

00:33:42.160 --> 00:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And in that sense, move to somewhere that has decent demographics and</v>

00:33:47.840 --> 00:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>again has those networks that can support you with regard to job</v>

00:33:52.240 --> 00:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>prospects and things like that.</v>

00:33:54.240 --> 00:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's great.</v>

00:33:55.680 --> 00:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I like it here.</v>

00:33:56.640 --> 00:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got family, been living in the hills here for hundreds of</v>

00:33:59.760 --> 00:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>years, so it made sense in my case.</v>

00:34:02.560 --> 00:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not going to say you no, you can't move to</v>

00:34:05.600 --> 00:34:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some part of the country if you don't have close cousins because</v>

00:34:08.640 --> 00:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately all Americans, and by Americans, of course, I mean racial Americans,</v>

00:34:13.920 --> 00:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are your cousins.</v>

00:34:15.600 --> 00:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's better to live close to close family, but by all means,</v>

00:34:19.760 --> 00:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if opportunity presents itself, moving somewhere like Tennessee makes perfect sense for</v>

00:34:24.160 --> 00:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>some people.</v>

00:34:26.320 --> 00:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Just be ready for the humidity.</v>

00:34:28.720 --> 00:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And also I had a bear walk through my front yard two</v>

00:34:31.280 --> 00:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>nights ago, so as long as you're fine with those things.</v>

00:34:38.640 --> 00:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Question five.</v>

00:34:41.920 --> 00:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a pastor about slavery slash genocide, basically racism</v>

00:34:46.720 --> 00:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>by proxy, and it became clear to me that one of us</v>

00:34:50.000 --> 00:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>had a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of morality.</v>

00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:57.760
<v Speaker 1>My understanding was basically that something was either inherently good or inherently</v>

00:34:57.760 --> 00:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>evil, and the fact that God cannot or will not sin basically</v>

00:35:01.920 --> 00:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>meant that he could or would not do something that was inherently</v>

00:35:05.520 --> 00:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>evil. His belief seemed to be that nothing was really inherently good</v>

00:35:09.360 --> 00:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or evil, and that anything God does is basically automatically cleansed for</v>

00:35:13.840 --> 00:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>him and made to be not evil, but that it doesn't make</v>

00:35:17.040 --> 00:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it not evil for us.</v>

00:35:18.640 --> 00:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you able to explain the proper understanding of how this actually</v>

00:35:22.160 --> 00:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>functions? That argument from argument I should put in quotations, but that</v>

00:35:26.240 --> 00:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>argument from your pastor comes up all the time.</v>

00:35:29.760 --> 00:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who started it, what the source is.</v>

00:35:35.520 --> 00:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's not only wrong, it's blasphemous.</v>

00:35:38.080 --> 00:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Because the nature of morality is that morality flows from God's nature.</v>

00:35:43.280 --> 00:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Because God is his nature, right?</v>

00:35:45.360 --> 00:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>God is what we would call attributes, what are known philosophically and</v>

00:35:49.360 --> 00:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>theologically is the transcendentals.</v>

00:35:51.200 --> 00:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Goodness, beauty, truth, unity, and being, if we want to use the</v>

00:35:54.400 --> 00:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth and the fifth, which we don't really need those ones here.</v>

00:35:56.320 --> 00:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>We just really need goodness, right?</v>

00:35:58.000 --> 00:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And truth.</v>

00:35:59.920 --> 00:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So something is good if it aligns with God's nature, if it</v>

00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is oriented toward its proper end, which is an end that God</v>

00:36:08.160 --> 00:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>has set for it, in accordance with its nature, its nature being</v>

00:36:11.920 --> 00:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a good thing created by God.</v>

00:36:14.640 --> 00:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But without I guess delving into some of that stuff, it gets</v>

00:36:17.760 --> 00:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a little complicated.</v>

00:36:19.120 --> 00:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You really just have to understand that core reality is that morality</v>

00:36:23.440 --> 00:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>flows from God's nature.</v>

00:36:25.680 --> 00:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>God's nature is unchanging.</v>

00:36:27.520 --> 00:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So that which is good will always be good.</v>

00:36:30.400 --> 00:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>That which is evil will always be evil.</v>

00:36:33.360 --> 00:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not good by virtue of God having done it.</v>

00:36:36.960 --> 00:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It is that God is good and would never do something evil.</v>

00:36:40.240 --> 00:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking in human terms, of course Because it's not it's not</v>

00:36:44.800 --> 00:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would or could, it's that it's incoherent to say that God would</v>

00:36:48.480 --> 00:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sin. It's we don't have the human terms for it.</v>

00:36:52.480 --> 00:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So the best we can say is wouldn't or couldn't or whatever</v>

00:36:56.080 --> 00:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be won't.</v>

00:36:57.920 --> 00:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Whatever terms we use, we're approximating the reality instead of saying it</v>

00:37:02.160 --> 00:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly. Because again, the best way that I've explained it, and the</v>

00:37:07.680 --> 00:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>best way I've found to explain it, is that just because you</v>

00:37:10.080 --> 00:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>can string some words together and it sounds like a sentence doesn't</v>

00:37:14.480 --> 00:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it is.</v>

00:37:15.840 --> 00:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the purple canoe sleeps briefly.</v>

00:37:20.000 --> 00:37:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not that right, that sounds like a sentence, but it's not.</v>

00:37:24.240 --> 00:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And so God does not sin is a true statement, but in</v>

00:37:29.840 --> 00:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that case it understates it.</v>

00:37:31.840 --> 00:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Saying God will not sin is is also kind of true, but</v>

00:37:36.080 --> 00:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it's incoherent.</v>

00:37:38.400 --> 00:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The real incoherent one is when you get into God cannot, right?</v>

00:37:42.560 --> 00:37:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Because God can do all things.</v>

00:37:44.720 --> 00:37:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But the sentence, God cannot sin, is technically true in a certain</v>

00:37:48.720 --> 00:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sense, but it's also incoherent because you're saying God who can do</v>

00:37:52.480 --> 00:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>all things cannot do something.</v>

00:37:54.720 --> 00:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much cannot as it is nonsense to say that</v>

00:37:58.960 --> 00:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>God would sin.</v>

00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>God is goodness.</v>

00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>God is the very ground of that which is good.</v>

00:38:05.280 --> 00:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't have something that is good if it is not aligned</v>

00:38:09.600 --> 00:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>toward God, aligned toward the ends for which God is.</v>

00:38:12.560 --> 00:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>created it.</v>

00:38:13.360 --> 00:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the very definition of that which is good.</v>

00:38:16.480 --> 00:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So your pastor is using a pastor, so maybe not your pastor,</v>

00:38:22.160 --> 00:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but this pastor was using a mercenary sense of it where they</v>

00:38:26.720 --> 00:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand part of why they tried to do it, because then</v>

00:38:29.840 --> 00:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they can say, well, genocide was fine because God commanded it, but</v>

00:38:33.120 --> 00:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it's evil, right?</v>

00:38:35.200 --> 00:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>That's their goal.</v>

00:38:36.160 --> 00:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>S slavery was fine because God commanded it, but otherwise it's evil.</v>

00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a It's a mercenary attempt to explain away the Old Testament</v>

00:38:43.440 --> 00:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>instead of believing the Old Testament is God's truth.</v>

00:38:46.160 --> 00:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, what they're actually doing is denying that objective morality exists.</v>

00:38:50.640 --> 00:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>This is sort of a command theory of morality.</v>

00:38:54.320 --> 00:38:56.240
<v Speaker 1>God can say anything he wants.</v>

00:38:56.240 --> 00:38:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So under this sort of interpretation, this is a way you can</v>

00:38:59.760 --> 00:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>actually argue with someone who advances this, thou shalt not kill.</v>

00:39:04.080 --> 00:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>God tomorrow, under this man's conception, could s could say, thou shalt</v>

00:39:08.400 --> 00:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>kill, and now it's moral.</v>

00:39:09.920 --> 00:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Notably we mean murder when we say kill in the sense, right?</v>

00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Would that be moral?</v>

00:39:15.680 --> 00:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>The answer is no, and God wouldn't do it.</v>

00:39:18.160 --> 00:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's what this man is saying, so you're say basically a</v>

00:39:20.800 --> 00:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>reduction to absurdity is what you're arguing against here, to defeat his</v>

00:39:25.040 --> 00:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>point. But the whole reason they're doing it is to dismiss the</v>

00:39:28.000 --> 00:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament and the parts that make them uncomfortable.</v>

00:39:30.400 --> 00:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>No And they're blaspheming God.</v>

00:39:33.360 --> 00:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>They're saying God changed or God could change.</v>

00:39:36.480 --> 00:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>They're saying God isn't God.</v>

00:39:38.320 --> 00:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And they're saying morality isn't real.</v>

00:39:41.280 --> 00:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And that is exactly the sort of thing that leads to men</v>

00:39:44.640 --> 00:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>not being men, men deciding they're women, or they're children, or they're</v>

00:39:49.680 --> 00:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a dog or a goat or whatever it happens to be.</v>

00:39:52.240 --> 00:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the same sort of nonsense saying that truth doesn't exist.</v>

00:39:55.520 --> 00:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It's merely a declaration that is true in a sense because of</v>

00:40:00.480 --> 00:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the declaration for some bounded period of time.</v>

00:40:03.920 --> 00:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So yes, you were arguing correctly and this pastor was absolutely wrong.</v>

00:40:09.280 --> 00:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But it is a common</v>

00:40:11.200 --> 00:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if I want to call it an error.</v>

00:40:13.760 --> 00:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a common evil, it is a common wickedness that someone</v>

00:40:18.320 --> 00:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>started. Question six.</v>

00:40:22.960 --> 00:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>six</v>

00:40:24.880 --> 00:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a note for myself here.</v>

00:40:27.600 --> 00:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>What is your take on Charlie Kirk's death and Candace's theory?</v>

00:40:32.320 --> 00:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I can answer the first part of that but not the second</v>

00:40:34.880 --> 00:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>because I don't pay any attention to Candace Owens.</v>

00:40:38.720 --> 00:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what she has been saying or not been</v>

00:40:42.960 --> 00:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>saying, but I was very clear very early on, I don't know</v>

00:40:47.040 --> 00:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly the timeline, how long it was before I said something after</v>

00:40:52.480 --> 00:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>his murder, his assassination, but I said bluntly that it was Israel.</v>

00:40:57.520 --> 00:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The Jews murdered him.</v>

00:40:58.960 --> 00:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And that was made very obvious by the fact that Netanyahu was</v>

00:41:02.400 --> 00:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>bragging about it almost immediately.</v>

00:41:05.120 --> 00:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I highlighted that in a post on X, so I'm sure</v>

00:41:08.960 --> 00:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>someone can find that and add that to the show notes.</v>

00:41:11.680 --> 00:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you understand how Jews brag and how they behave publicly,</v>

00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he was absolutely bragging about having done it.</v>

00:41:18.240 --> 00:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that is my belief that has not changed.</v>

00:41:25.280 --> 00:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Question Question seven in what quantifiable, measurable, and observable ways did Christianity</v>

00:41:32.960 --> 00:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit pagan Europe or Europeans?</v>

00:41:35.840 --> 00:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a pagan friend that I go back and forth with.</v>

00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>There are really two answers to this, and I'll get the sort</v>

00:41:44.160 --> 00:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of secondary one out of the way briefly because it's the shorter</v>

00:41:47.520 --> 00:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>answer. The second is that truth matters whether or not it benefits</v>

00:41:52.880 --> 00:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you. The measure of whether or not something is true is not</v>

00:41:55.920 --> 00:42:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a mercenary calculation of whether or not you will benefit from adhering</v>

00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to that truth, right?</v>

00:42:03.040 --> 00:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Something is true objectively.</v>

00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So the question initially, in this case the secondary concern, but the</v>

00:42:11.440 --> 00:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>initial question is is Christianity true?</v>

00:42:15.200 --> 00:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Not does Christianity benefit?</v>

00:42:18.160 --> 00:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But then to get on the benefit, incidentally, Christianity is both true</v>

00:42:21.440 --> 00:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and does benefit, right?</v>

00:42:24.480 --> 00:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So for one, we had</v>

00:42:27.760 --> 00:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the establishment of an objective morality in parts of Europe that did</v>

00:42:32.080 --> 00:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not previously have it.</v>

00:42:34.160 --> 00:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, there were certain tribes that behaved very well prior to Christianization.</v>

00:42:39.920 --> 00:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Were they improved by Christianization?</v>

00:42:42.000 --> 00:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say yes.</v>

00:42:43.600 --> 00:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that they were wild, crazy, feral animals before</v>

00:42:48.560 --> 00:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they were Christianized, right?</v>

00:42:49.920 --> 00:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Tacitus, for instance, I've used this example many times.</v>

00:42:52.400 --> 00:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Tacitus remarks upon how highly esteemed marriage is among the Germans, and</v>

00:42:57.680 --> 00:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that adultery is basically unheard of, and that indeed they execute adulterers.</v>

00:43:02.640 --> 00:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So were they behaving according to the moral law without having the</v>

00:43:07.360 --> 00:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian scriptures?</v>

00:43:08.560 --> 00:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. That was a good thing, because do remember, the law's written</v>

00:43:12.000 --> 00:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on your heart, whether you're a believer or not, you have a</v>

00:43:15.120 --> 00:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>conscience, and even the pagans had a conscience, the heathen, the unbelievers.</v>

00:43:22.160 --> 00:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But is there a benefit to having the fullness of that moral</v>

00:43:27.360 --> 00:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>law written out for you?</v>

00:43:29.120 --> 00:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Well the answer is yes.</v>

00:43:30.640 --> 00:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It is more beneficial to have it written out than to just</v>

00:43:33.680 --> 00:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have it in a fragmentary way.</v>

00:43:35.680 --> 00:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But with regard to concrete benefits, I always point out that the</v>

00:43:41.600 --> 00:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>height of</v>

00:43:43.840 --> 00:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>life, quality of life, things like that for Europeans, was not Rome.</v>

00:43:49.440 --> 00:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It certainly wasn't Greece.</v>

00:43:51.200 --> 00:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It was the Holy Roman Empire.</v>

00:43:53.040 --> 00:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the height of the quality of life in terms of</v>

00:43:57.120 --> 00:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the things that actually matter.</v>

00:43:58.320 --> 00:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I know there'll be people who will object and say, oh, we're</v>

00:44:00.560 --> 00:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>more materially comfort.</v>

00:44:02.000 --> 00:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure. I've got an AC vent directly above me right now because</v>

00:44:05.360 --> 00:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still like 86 degrees outside.</v>

00:44:07.840 --> 00:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Am I materially comfortable in ways today that I would not have</v>

00:44:10.880 --> 00:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>been in the Holy Roman Empire?</v>

00:44:12.640 --> 00:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Technological advance has brought some benefits.</v>

00:44:16.320 --> 00:44:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But with regard to quality of life and the things that matter,</v>

00:44:20.320 --> 00:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are we better off?</v>

00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Look at the depression numbers, look at the anxiety numbers, look at</v>

00:44:25.920 --> 00:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the marriage numbers, these things are all abysmal.</v>

00:44:29.200 --> 00:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So have we benefited from the de-Christianization?</v>

00:44:32.560 --> 00:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, no.</v>

00:44:34.080 --> 00:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Did we benefit from Christianization?</v>

00:44:36.400 --> 00:44:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say obviously yes, because we had that upward trajectory until</v>

00:44:40.720 --> 00:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we started to reject Christianity, until we started to apostatize.</v>

00:44:45.280 --> 00:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And also bear in mind, when did European power peak?</v>

00:44:49.760 --> 00:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It peaked at the end of the period of colonization, which was</v>

00:44:53.840 --> 00:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a spread of Christianity</v>

00:44:55.840 --> 00:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>over the face of the earth after centuries of being Christian.</v>

00:45:00.560 --> 00:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Our power didn't peak under the various pagan groups that preceded Christianization.</v>

00:45:06.960 --> 00:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>We didn't get to the moon as pagans.</v>

00:45:10.160 --> 00:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We got there and had the Lord's Supper on the Moon.</v>

00:45:14.960 --> 00:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what we did as Christians.</v>

00:45:17.120 --> 00:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>The height of our civilization, regardless of how you look for it,</v>

00:45:20.640 --> 00:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be found when we were Christians.</v>

00:45:23.360 --> 00:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And as Christianity has declined, so has our civilization.</v>

00:45:28.320 --> 00:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So the argument I don't even know where you would start to</v>

00:45:31.920 --> 00:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>try to make the argument that there was a peak under paganism</v>

00:45:35.360 --> 00:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because the best thing you could argue is that Rome was okay</v>

00:45:39.920 --> 00:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were an upper class noble and you lived in the</v>

00:45:45.040 --> 00:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>inner part of the empire.</v>

00:45:47.200 --> 00:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>If you lived in the hinterlands, life wasn't great.</v>

00:45:50.400 --> 00:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>If you were the lower classes, life wasn't great.</v>

00:45:54.480 --> 00:45:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Rome was a brutal society where basically unless you were part of</v>

00:45:59.760 --> 00:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the patrician classes, unless you had immense wealth and influence, it wasn't</v>

00:46:04.560 --> 00:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>great to live in Rome.</v>

00:46:05.760 --> 00:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And Rome was better than Greece.</v>

00:46:07.840 --> 00:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how you could argue that we have this</v>

00:46:11.360 --> 00:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of peak at any point under paganism.</v>

00:46:14.160 --> 00:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's really just a romantic misconception of our history in order to</v>

00:46:19.520 --> 00:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>arrive at obviously his desired conclusion is Christianity is bad.</v>

00:46:24.000 --> 00:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>He's making a mercenary argument.</v>

00:46:25.920 --> 00:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not actually setting forth facts to arrive there because the peak</v>

00:46:29.920 --> 00:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of our civilization was Christendom.</v>

00:46:33.040 --> 00:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We had the best quality of life under Christianity.</v>

00:46:37.040 --> 00:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Things have declined as we have become less Christian.</v>

00:46:40.960 --> 00:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So Christianity is true, I think that's the more salient matter because</v>

00:46:45.680 --> 00:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the truth matters even if it doesn't benefit you.</v>

00:46:48.400 --> 00:46:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And then incidentally Christianity does also benefit you because if you adhere</v>

00:46:53.920 --> 00:46:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to God's laws and you behave in a Christian way, you will</v>

00:46:57.280 --> 00:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have a better society.</v>

00:46:58.880 --> 00:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But yes, you don't have to be Christian to behave in a</v>

00:47:02.400 --> 00:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>moral way.</v>

00:47:03.120 --> 00:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Christians have never said that's the case.</v>

00:47:05.840 --> 00:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It is better to have the fullness of the law than to</v>

00:47:09.760 --> 00:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have the fragmentary bits of it that are discerned through human wisdom.</v>

00:47:14.480 --> 00:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's better to be Christian than not to be Christian, both</v>

00:47:18.000 --> 00:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of adherence to the truth and in terms of the</v>

00:47:22.000 --> 00:47:26.720
<v Speaker 1>comforts of life and having a better life.</v>

00:47:26.720 --> 00:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll pull out some questions here from the chat now.</v>

00:47:45.280 --> 00:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>A question about Pope Gregory that I will leave for next week</v>

00:47:51.280 --> 00:47:54.720
<v Speaker 1>because I want to look at exactly what's being asked there.</v>

00:47:54.880 --> 00:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Just going to add a few questions to my</v>

00:47:58.320 --> 00:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>ongoing list so I don't lose them.</v>

00:48:25.520 --> 00:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Answer this one because I can answer this without having to.</v>

00:48:30.480 --> 00:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Question where are we?</v>

00:48:33.200 --> 00:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Question eight.</v>

00:48:37.200 --> 00:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you read the book The Black Sun and generally what do</v>

00:48:40.880 --> 00:48:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you make of the historic association of national socialism with occultism?</v>

00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Could you specifically comment on the Black Sun symbol they apparently put</v>

00:48:48.560 --> 00:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in a castle?</v>

00:48:50.080 --> 00:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So So I have not read that book, so I can't comment</v>

00:48:54.960 --> 00:48:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on that book.</v>

00:48:56.400 --> 00:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But the relationship of occultism and national socialism is blown wildly out</v>

00:49:01.120 --> 00:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of proportion.</v>

00:49:02.160 --> 00:49:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Were there a handful of individuals who were interested in some occultic</v>

00:49:06.720 --> 00:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>nonsense? Yes, there were.</v>

00:49:09.600 --> 00:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Overwhelmingly, however, the leadership were traditional Christians, and they were mostly Roman</v>

00:49:14.560 --> 00:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Catholic and Lutheran, handful of reformed, but</v>

00:49:17.920 --> 00:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the overwhelming majority of the leadership of every part of National Socialist</v>

00:49:23.200 --> 00:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Germany was Christian.</v>

00:49:24.880 --> 00:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And Germany itself was 95 plus percent Christian</v>

00:49:28.160 --> 00:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>during and after the war even.</v>

00:49:30.560 --> 00:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it went up during the National Socialist period.</v>

00:49:34.320 --> 00:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So the occultic thing is blown out of proportion in order to</v>

00:49:38.080 --> 00:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>demonize national socialists primarily in the mind of baby boomers.</v>

00:49:42.480 --> 00:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They were the ones who really bought into that.</v>

00:49:44.480 --> 00:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>The younger generations aren't buying it because they've been seeing the actual</v>

00:49:48.160 --> 00:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>speeches and hearing the actual words and have access to the actual</v>

00:49:52.560 --> 00:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>documents. There was a question last week about the Hitler youth meetings</v>

00:49:57.200 --> 00:49:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and when they were held.</v>

00:49:58.320 --> 00:50:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The baby boomers were apparently told they were held on Sundays to</v>

00:50:01.200 --> 00:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>conflict with the church.</v>

00:50:02.640 --> 00:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>The reality is we still have the documents, they were held on</v>

00:50:05.200 --> 00:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Saturday, so it's just not a thing.</v>

00:50:09.680 --> 00:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a handful of weird individuals?</v>

00:50:13.120 --> 00:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Would it perhaps have been better if they'd been shoved in</v>

00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>an attic somewhere for Further away from the center of power?</v>

00:50:19.200 --> 00:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Probably yes, but by and large they were sidelined and told to</v>

00:50:22.880 --> 00:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cut it out.</v>

00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Like Hitler personally told a number of individuals to cut it out</v>

00:50:27.440 --> 00:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with the pagan nonsense because it was annoying him, and it was</v>

00:50:30.560 --> 00:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just it was nonsense, right?</v>

00:50:32.400 --> 00:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He is literally the source of the LARP meme, of calling neopagans</v>

00:50:38.160 --> 00:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>LARPers. That's literally from Hitler.</v>

00:50:40.960 --> 00:50:42.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a quote from him, basically.</v>

00:50:42.880 --> 00:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So No, the the occult stuff, the accusations are not real.</v>

00:50:48.320 --> 00:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And the black sun is just a stylized symbol of the sun.</v>

00:50:52.000 --> 00:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We have symbols of the sun all the way back through history.</v>

00:50:55.600 --> 00:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>The Hakkenkreuz is partly a Christian symbol and partly just what happens</v>

00:51:00.880 --> 00:51:04.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the rotation of certain heavenly bodies over the</v>

00:51:04.720 --> 00:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>course of a year, the four seasons, right?</v>

00:51:07.520 --> 00:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And before people get weird about that and think, oh you can't</v>

00:51:10.880 --> 00:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the stars and literally in scripture it says the stars</v>

00:51:14.880 --> 00:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are created for signs.</v>

00:51:16.960 --> 00:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I went into this previously, we don't know and understand exactly how</v>

00:51:21.200 --> 00:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that worked because that was lost to history, but it's still there,</v>

00:51:24.880 --> 00:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still in scripture.</v>

00:51:25.920 --> 00:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with using symbols from God's creation, as long as</v>

00:51:29.840 --> 00:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not worshiping them, right?</v>

00:51:31.920 --> 00:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Using the sun as a symbol, very common in heraldry back for</v>

00:51:36.480 --> 00:51:40.240
<v Speaker 1>centuries through Christendom, that's not identical to worshiping the sun.</v>

00:51:40.240 --> 00:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't object to the symbol.</v>

00:51:41.440 --> 00:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine.</v>

00:51:42.560 --> 00:51:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Just, you know, don't worship the sun.</v>

00:51:57.120 --> 00:51:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Question nine.</v>

00:51:58.720 --> 00:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the current model of pastors being paid for simply</v>

00:52:01.680 --> 00:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>being pastors is biblical, or is a pastor being by vocational a</v>

00:52:06.000 --> 00:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>better model?</v>

00:52:07.200 --> 00:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have the clear example, right, of Paul and Paul contrasting</v>

00:52:13.600 --> 00:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>himself with others and he says that he is working for his</v>

00:52:17.040 --> 00:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>own keep, right?</v>

00:52:17.840 --> 00:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a tent maker, and others are not doing so because they're</v>

00:52:21.520 --> 00:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>preaching the gospel and sustaining themselves that way.</v>

00:52:23.920 --> 00:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So both exist in scripture, both are fine.</v>

00:52:27.200 --> 00:52:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You can do either one.</v>

00:52:29.280 --> 00:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I think it's better to have a bivocational pastor?</v>

00:52:33.520 --> 00:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>These days, perhaps, but under ideal circumstances, I don't think so, because</v>

00:52:38.320 --> 00:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have a pastor for an average a good average, not</v>

00:52:42.960 --> 00:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily whatever average is right now, but for an average size congregation,</v>

00:52:47.360 --> 00:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a full-time job.</v>

00:52:49.120 --> 00:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Because you are supposed to know the state of the families in</v>

00:52:52.960 --> 00:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>your congregation, you're supposed to spend time with them.</v>

00:52:55.600 --> 00:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to talk to them, pray with them, do all these</v>

00:52:57.840 --> 00:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>things. You're supposed to care for the sick.</v>

00:52:59.920 --> 00:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to teach.</v>

00:53:00.880 --> 00:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to prepare your sermon.</v>

00:53:02.640 --> 00:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to have a midweek lesson.</v>

00:53:04.560 --> 00:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of work if you're a pastor and you're doing</v>

00:53:07.520 --> 00:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>your job.</v>

00:53:08.560 --> 00:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's better to have pastors who are dedicated to</v>

00:53:13.440 --> 00:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that, that is their sole job.</v>

00:53:15.440 --> 00:53:18.800
<v Speaker 1>However, that being said, other than obviously being a father and a</v>

00:53:18.800 --> 00:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>husband, right?</v>

00:53:19.440 --> 00:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to do the that as well.</v>

00:53:21.440 --> 00:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I don't think men should go into the pastorate</v>

00:53:24.880 --> 00:53:26.960
<v Speaker 1>until they are second career.</v>

00:53:26.960 --> 00:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I think you need that life experience and you need to</v>

00:53:29.600 --> 00:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>be a little older, you need to have a few gray hairs</v>

00:53:32.560 --> 00:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for the other men in the congregation to take you seriously.</v>

00:53:35.680 --> 00:53:38.240
<v Speaker 1>They're just not going to take you seriously if you're a twenty</v>

00:53:38.240 --> 00:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>one year old fresh out of graduate school, and they probably shouldn't</v>

00:53:41.360 --> 00:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>take you seriously.</v>

00:53:42.400 --> 00:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if you're a prod if you're a prodigy, they</v>

00:53:44.720 --> 00:53:46.720
<v Speaker 1>probably should not take you seriously.</v>

00:53:46.720 --> 00:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Go out and actually live something of life first.</v>

00:53:50.960 --> 00:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to give you a perspective you don't have if you</v>

00:53:53.520 --> 00:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>spent all of your time in academia.</v>

00:53:56.400 --> 00:54:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Granted, pastors are usually less of that kind, that's more the theologian,</v>

00:54:00.080 --> 00:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>but still I think it's better if the pastor goes into it</v>

00:54:02.800 --> 00:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>when he's in his, you know, thirties or even forties.</v>

00:54:23.120 --> 00:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll briefly touch on this one without going into too much depth.</v>

00:54:29.920 --> 00:54:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Is Baal or Baal if you want to pronounce it technically correctly,</v>

00:54:34.240 --> 00:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Satan and Saturn, are they identical?</v>

00:54:36.960 --> 00:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you know about Saturn?</v>

00:54:39.040 --> 00:54:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I know the star of Remfen and Black Cube are associated with</v>

00:54:42.160 --> 00:54:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Saturn, so getting back into the occult, I guess.</v>

00:54:46.080 --> 00:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of this stuff you don't want to delve into it too</v>

00:54:50.080 --> 00:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>deeply, because delving into the occult and the demonic is always bad</v>

00:54:54.160 --> 00:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>for you.</v>

00:54:55.120 --> 00:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of the sort of caveats or downsides of say</v>

00:55:00.000 --> 00:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>being an exorcist.</v>

00:55:00.880 --> 00:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to deal with these things.</v>

00:55:02.880 --> 00:55:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And you don't want to.</v>

00:55:04.080 --> 00:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I've gone over this many times before.</v>

00:55:05.440 --> 00:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>There's such a thing as bad knowledge.</v>

00:55:06.880 --> 00:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>There are things you don't want to know.</v>

00:55:08.640 --> 00:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But it is worth knowing that there are connections with regard to</v>

00:55:13.520 --> 00:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>these symbols and these practices historically and even And even today.</v>

00:55:17.200 --> 00:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So the black cube is definitely associated with Satan and with Saturn.</v>

00:55:23.440 --> 00:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So you see that in a number of different cultures, you see</v>

00:55:27.040 --> 00:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it particularly among the Jews.</v>

00:55:28.960 --> 00:55:31.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why they have the little black cube on their heads.</v>

00:55:31.360 --> 00:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing it to be pious or to store scrolls and</v>

00:55:36.560 --> 00:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be, you know, true worshippers of God.</v>

00:55:39.440 --> 00:55:42.400
<v Speaker 1>They're revealing in public what they are.</v>

00:55:42.400 --> 00:55:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They are Saturnists, they are Satanists.</v>

00:55:46.080 --> 00:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>That is what they are.</v>

00:55:47.360 --> 00:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So is Baal and Satan, are they identical?</v>

00:55:51.120 --> 00:55:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily.</v>

00:55:52.240 --> 00:55:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And do remember that Baal just means Lord, historically, so sometimes it</v>

00:55:56.720 --> 00:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was a title that was just applied to whichever local god was</v>

00:56:00.640 --> 00:56:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the god of a given tribe, and then it morphed over time</v>

00:56:05.040 --> 00:56:09.840
<v Speaker 1>into the the great god, as it were, of that region being</v>

00:56:10.080 --> 00:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Baal was the highest one for many different peoples.</v>

00:56:14.160 --> 00:56:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes that means Satan, but it does not always mean Satan.</v>

00:56:18.320 --> 00:56:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It could mean some other demon.</v>

00:56:20.400 --> 00:56:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't know exactly what the relationship is, like the one-to-one relationship</v>

00:56:24.720 --> 00:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes.</v>

00:56:25.920 --> 00:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, this name is this demon.</v>

00:56:28.160 --> 00:56:30.240
<v Speaker 1>God has not given us that information.</v>

00:56:30.240 --> 00:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to know it.</v>

00:56:32.080 --> 00:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So are they worshiping demons?</v>

00:56:34.000 --> 00:56:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Are they ultimately worshiping Satan?</v>

00:56:36.720 --> 00:56:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes. That's what's important to recognize, and then you start to recognize</v>

00:56:41.280 --> 00:56:44.800
<v Speaker 1>where these occult symbols pop up, because like I've said many times</v>

00:56:44.800 --> 00:56:48.000
<v Speaker 1>before, it very much seems to be the case that God has</v>

00:56:48.000 --> 00:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>required them to broadcast their plans to a certain degree, not to</v>

00:56:52.640 --> 00:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>operate totally in the shadows, to give us a chance to respond</v>

00:56:56.320 --> 00:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to it, and we've sort of been failing to respond accordingly for</v>

00:56:59.840 --> 00:57:01.760
<v Speaker 1>quite some time.</v>

00:57:01.760 --> 00:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But excuse me.</v>

00:57:03.840 --> 00:57:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's very clearly demonic, and what the connection is exactly with</v>

00:57:08.400 --> 00:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Saturn, I don't think we know.</v>

00:57:11.200 --> 00:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's certainly there There.</v>

00:57:25.360 --> 00:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>A follow up question sort of</v>

00:57:30.240 --> 00:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>How can I stay in the lines in quotation marks in regard</v>

00:57:33.360 --> 00:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to the law while writing about the Jews?</v>

00:57:35.760 --> 00:57:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to be safe and not get in trouble, to be</v>

00:57:38.320 --> 00:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>more like you and Carl Rodel as prime examples.</v>

00:57:41.680 --> 00:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

00:57:44.560 --> 00:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it obviously helps if you're familiar with the actual law in this</v>

00:57:47.680 --> 00:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>area. And the law is very clear about what counts as, you</v>

00:57:51.200 --> 00:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know, incitement to violence or things like that.</v>

00:57:53.760 --> 00:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You obviously can't incite violence.</v>

00:57:55.680 --> 00:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed to do that.</v>

00:57:57.360 --> 00:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So you can't discuss.</v>

00:58:01.200 --> 00:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, you can I want to be careful here,</v>

00:58:06.160 --> 00:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily because legally speaking, but this is also an important part</v>

00:58:09.600 --> 00:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of it.</v>

00:58:10.320 --> 00:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Legally speaking, you have certain bounds to what you are permitted to</v>

00:58:15.600 --> 00:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>say in public.</v>

00:58:17.200 --> 00:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And basically you're not to permitted to incite imminent lawless action is</v>

00:58:22.640 --> 00:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>essentially the standard.</v>

00:58:23.840 --> 00:58:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you are so inclined, you can go read the case</v>

00:58:26.960 --> 00:58:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and pull out the the greater extent of that holding, the fuller</v>

00:58:32.000 --> 00:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>holding, not just that summary of it.</v>

00:58:34.080 --> 00:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That is an an accurate summary though.</v>

00:58:36.320 --> 00:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not enough if you're just a crazy person yelling</v>

00:58:39.600 --> 00:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on the street corner but there's no risk of inciting imminent lawless</v>

00:58:44.240 --> 00:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>action. But obviously you don't want to be that guy.</v>

00:58:47.440 --> 00:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>However, there is a second layer to it, practically speaking, because you</v>

00:58:52.800 --> 00:58:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are not just subject to the the</v>

00:58:56.560 --> 00:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>law of the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court, you're also</v>

00:59:00.720 --> 00:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>subject to the terms and conditions of every service you're using, right?</v>

00:59:04.800 --> 00:59:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, right now, I'm streaming to YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Rumble,</v>

00:59:10.720 --> 00:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and X.</v>

00:59:12.960 --> 00:59:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I am subject to the terms of service of those various platforms,</v>

00:59:18.880 --> 00:59:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I cannot run afoul of those with what I say</v>

00:59:22.320 --> 00:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or they will terminate my account and then I can't stream and</v>

00:59:25.200 --> 00:59:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then you can't listen to my answers to the questions unless we</v>

00:59:28.640 --> 00:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>find some other platform that will not ban me.</v>

00:59:31.120 --> 00:59:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So the question isn't with regard to something like this, is it</v>

00:59:35.440 --> 00:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>legal for me to say it?</v>

00:59:37.120 --> 00:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It is is it permissible according to the requirements of the platform?</v>

00:59:42.000 --> 00:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So generally speaking, as long as you are factual in your analysis</v>

00:59:47.840 --> 00:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're not making inflammatory statements inciting people to violence, you're probably</v>

00:59:54.480 --> 00:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to run afoul of the rules, right?</v>

00:59:56.560 --> 01:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes there are topics you can't discuss and more likely than not</v>

01:00:00.320 --> 01:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll be demonetized, regardless, even if you're very careful about how you</v>

01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>discuss things, you'll probably be demonetized for talking about naughty subjects, right?</v>

01:00:09.760 --> 01:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Subjects you're not allowed to address.</v>

01:00:11.360 --> 01:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases, it's not even subjects related to say To</v>

01:00:13.920 --> 01:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>say the Jews or religion or something truly controversial, it could just</v>

01:00:17.600 --> 01:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be something advertisers don't like, right?</v>

01:00:19.840 --> 01:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So there are a number of different layers to it, and so</v>

01:00:22.400 --> 01:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it sort of depends on what you're doing.</v>

01:00:24.320 --> 01:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're just writing and publishing books, don't run afoul of Supreme</v>

01:00:28.640 --> 01:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Court precedent and the actual state of the law with regard to</v>

01:00:31.360 --> 01:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution.</v>

01:00:32.400 --> 01:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're streaming, you have to comply with the terms and sir</v>

01:00:35.440 --> 01:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the terms of service, the regulations, the policies of the platforms you're</v>

01:00:39.440 --> 01:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>using. So it's an answer that it depends, which is the standard</v>

01:00:43.040 --> 01:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>attorney answer, but it is the reality, it's an accurate answer.</v>

01:00:47.280 --> 01:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So stay factual, stay objective, don't veer into polemics too</v>

01:00:55.120 --> 01:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hard in the sense of inflammatory language.</v>

01:00:57.600 --> 01:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Polemics fine as long as it's not, you know, standing up and</v>

01:01:00.880 --> 01:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>advocating for something, right?</v>

01:01:03.920 --> 01:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, euphemism exists in English, and it has a use,</v>

01:01:08.400 --> 01:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it has a utility, I employ it.</v>

01:01:10.400 --> 01:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the ways that you can speak the truth</v>

01:01:13.120 --> 01:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>without immediately getting the banhammer.</v>

01:01:15.680 --> 01:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So some men are suited for it, some aren't, that's uh wisdom</v>

01:01:19.680 --> 01:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>call for you to make for yourself.</v>

01:01:35.200 --> 01:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Question 12.</v>

01:01:36.480 --> 01:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll probably do a try to do a I don't</v>

01:01:38.640 --> 01:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know how many more questions, but trying to get through some of</v>

01:01:41.360 --> 01:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones in the chat.</v>

01:01:42.640 --> 01:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:43.920 --> 01:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Question 12: Can you speak on the pacifism of Christianity?</v>

01:01:47.600 --> 01:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeking proof that the religion is not pacifist at its core.</v>

01:01:52.080 --> 01:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the accusation that Christianity is pacifist isn't even really</v>

01:01:59.600 --> 01:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>historically an accusation leveled against Christianity.</v>

01:02:03.120 --> 01:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a modern accusation and it largely comes from groups like the</v>

01:02:08.160 --> 01:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Quakers and others who were pacifist and to some degree, the Amish</v>

01:02:12.160 --> 01:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Mennonites and things like that.</v>

01:02:14.560 --> 01:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just misinterpreting scripture.</v>

01:02:16.800 --> 01:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>The overwhelming majority of Christians have never for a second entertained Christianity</v>

01:02:21.520 --> 01:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as being pacifist.</v>

01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the best ways to approach this, perhaps, would</v>

01:02:28.160 --> 01:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be to point out the distinction between private enemies and public enemies.</v>

01:02:33.440 --> 01:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's also the enemies of God, which are kind of</v>

01:02:36.400 --> 01:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>public enemies, but slightly different thing.</v>

01:02:38.320 --> 01:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You can of course go and listen to the Stonequire episode on</v>

01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that. I will try to remember to put that in the show</v>

01:02:45.680 --> 01:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>notes. But the short version is that your private enemies are the</v>

01:02:51.920 --> 01:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ones you are to forgive.</v>

01:02:53.360 --> 01:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>This is where part of the accusation, right, of Christianity being pacifist</v>

01:02:57.120 --> 01:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from.</v>

01:02:58.240 --> 01:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You are to forgive your private enemies.</v>

01:03:00.160 --> 01:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Your private enemy is your neighbor who borrows your lawnmower and never</v>

01:03:03.600 --> 01:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>returns it.</v>

01:03:04.800 --> 01:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Right? You go ask him for the lawnmower, but you forgive him</v>

01:03:08.720 --> 01:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for not returning the lawnmower.</v>

01:03:10.320 --> 01:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You forgive him for denting your tool.</v>

01:03:12.480 --> 01:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You forgive him for annoying you.</v>

01:03:15.200 --> 01:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You cannot forgive the people invading your country.</v>

01:03:19.920 --> 01:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not your private enemies.</v>

01:03:21.840 --> 01:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>They are public enemies.</v>

01:03:23.040 --> 01:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>They are enemies of your nation, they are enemies of the state.</v>

01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You are not permitted to forgive them.</v>

01:03:28.400 --> 01:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's insane to say that.</v>

01:03:31.120 --> 01:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And the example that I'll use, that's the best example, so just</v>

01:03:34.800 --> 01:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and use this one, for people who try to argue</v>

01:03:38.160 --> 01:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that you oh you just have to forgive all enemies.</v>

01:03:40.800 --> 01:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Can you forgive Satan for rebelling against God?</v>

01:03:45.600 --> 01:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Satan's your enemy.</v>

01:03:47.280 --> 01:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Satan is the arch enemy of Christians of mankind.</v>

01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You are not permitted to forgive God's enemies, and so if there</v>

01:03:54.960 --> 01:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is an enemy, you are not permitted to forgive, then you are</v>

01:03:58.400 --> 01:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly not supposed to forgive all enemies.</v>

01:04:01.200 --> 01:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It would in fact be a sin to try to forgive Satan.</v>

01:04:05.120 --> 01:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So you have to bear in mind that there are different kinds</v>

01:04:07.840 --> 01:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of enemies, and you are not commanded to forgive all of them,</v>

01:04:10.320 --> 01:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's not your place.</v>

01:04:12.240 --> 01:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you can look at down through history, Christians have always</v>

01:04:15.760 --> 01:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>taken up arms to defend their nation, to defend Christendom, defend their</v>

01:04:19.040 --> 01:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>homes, defend their lives You have duties to defend these things, because</v>

01:04:24.320 --> 01:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>these things have been entrusted to you by God.</v>

01:04:27.120 --> 01:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Right? And so when Scripture says, Thou shalt not murder, there are</v>

01:04:33.280 --> 01:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>positive requirements that come along with that.</v>

01:04:35.600 --> 01:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Defending your neighbor's life is part of that.</v>

01:04:38.400 --> 01:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's defense of others.</v>

01:04:40.320 --> 01:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You are God's slave.</v>

01:04:42.240 --> 01:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You are not permitted to let God's property be destroyed.</v>

01:04:46.160 --> 01:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to defend yourself.</v>

01:04:47.440 --> 01:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>That's self-defense.</v>

01:04:48.880 --> 01:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Christians have always believed in these things, in this hierarchy of loves</v>

01:04:53.600 --> 01:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and duties, and pacifism has no place in Christianity.</v>

01:04:58.320 --> 01:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It used to be we executed pacifists.</v>

01:05:01.360 --> 01:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It was considered a capital offense.</v>

01:05:03.920 --> 01:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And we should maybe go back to that in some cases.</v>

01:05:06.560 --> 01:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it would stop the nonsense of men trying to spread that</v>

01:05:09.440 --> 01:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>lie. Christianity is very obviously not pacifist, though.</v>

01:05:27.440 --> 01:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, I'll put this question in my Question 13.</v>

01:05:31.120 --> 01:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the debate on the curse of Ham with Dale</v>

01:05:33.600 --> 01:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Partridge and the individuals struggling with sanctification last night?</v>

01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I did not watch it.</v>

01:05:40.480 --> 01:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard that it was kind of a dumpster fire.</v>

01:05:43.680 --> 01:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So I assume that was an accurate assessment given the men who</v>

01:05:46.240 --> 01:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>told me that.</v>

01:05:46.960 --> 01:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But no, I did not personally watch it.</v>

01:05:52.080 --> 01:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But yes, that the individual whom I also debated was certainly an</v>

01:05:57.600 --> 01:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>experience. Question fourteen related question.</v>

01:06:00.640 --> 01:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I have some friends who watched your debates.</v>

01:06:04.160 --> 01:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering how we could trace the continuity of the genealogy</v>

01:06:07.280 --> 01:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the curse of ham.</v>

01:06:09.040 --> 01:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So this one's actually pretty easy to trace because there are really</v>

01:06:12.800 --> 01:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>three great races of men on Earth.</v>

01:06:15.680 --> 01:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You have the Europeans, the Asiatics in the broad sense, sort of</v>

01:06:20.480 --> 01:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the British sense of Asian, and the Africans.</v>

01:06:23.680 --> 01:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Now there are subgroups within that and at the periphery you get</v>

01:06:26.640 --> 01:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mixtures, but those are the three groups and those just correspond to</v>

01:06:29.760 --> 01:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the three sons of Noah.</v>

01:06:31.840 --> 01:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got Japheth as Europeans, you've got Shem as the Asiatics, Majulo,</v>

01:06:36.240 --> 01:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Arabs are part Hamite, and then you have Ham</v>

01:06:39.440 --> 01:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>as the Africans.</v>

01:06:40.800 --> 01:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So it really is just, I mean you can basically tell by</v>

01:06:43.120 --> 01:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>skin tone for Japheth versus Ham, right?</v>

01:06:46.720 --> 01:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily at the periphery for some of the Shemites, they're fair-skinned,</v>

01:06:50.800 --> 01:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but you can certainly identify the sons of Ham on site.</v>

01:06:54.240 --> 01:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's really not difficult.</v>

01:06:55.840 --> 01:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's also, like I said previously, you can see this with</v>

01:06:59.360 --> 01:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>genetic studies, different populations and how distant they are from one another.</v>

01:07:04.160 --> 01:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And the Africans are very clearly more distant from everyone else than</v>

01:07:08.800 --> 01:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>than other groups are from each other.</v>

01:07:10.640 --> 01:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's not difficult to identify the the different groups descended from</v>

01:07:14.640 --> 01:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the sons of Noah.</v>

01:07:15.920 --> 01:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Except like I said, at the periphery where you've had the admixture</v>

01:07:18.960 --> 01:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>over centuries, then in some cases they're descended from two, like the</v>

01:07:22.320 --> 01:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>air in scripture we see that, right?</v>

01:07:24.400 --> 01:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The Arabs are descended from a union of Ham and Shem.</v>

01:07:28.240 --> 01:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>That's very clear in scripture with the son of Abraham.</v>

01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So</v>

01:07:33.440 --> 01:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I don't think it would be difficult to identify which</v>

01:07:36.880 --> 01:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>groups are descended from hammering</v>

01:07:57.760 --> 01:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Question fifteen in the case of not having access to a Lutheran</v>

01:08:03.440 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>church, only Baptist churches should I go to the Baptist church and</v>

01:08:06.480 --> 01:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>abstain from the Lord's Supper?</v>

01:08:08.080 --> 01:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be my recommendation, yes.</v>

01:08:10.560 --> 01:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've gone into this in some depth previously, so I would</v>

01:08:14.960 --> 01:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>say listen to the times where I've been asked about attending X</v>

01:08:20.160 --> 01:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>denomination instead of another, because I've specifically gone over the Lord's Supper.</v>

01:08:24.400 --> 01:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And basic basically the issue is that you don't want to give</v>

01:08:28.400 --> 01:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a false public confession, but like I've said, there are times where</v>

01:08:32.240 --> 01:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe I wouldn't be uncomfortable communing at say an Anglican church because</v>

01:08:36.240 --> 01:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they do confess the real presence.</v>

01:08:37.920 --> 01:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Granted it's sort of in the reformed sense, which we disagree with</v>

01:08:41.120 --> 01:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as Lutherans, but the question, as I pointed out previously, would be,</v>

01:08:46.400 --> 01:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>am I making a public confession of the doctrine that is being</v>

01:08:50.160 --> 01:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>preached, or am I making a public confession confession of my unity</v>

01:08:54.720 --> 01:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with these men as brothers?</v>

01:08:56.240 --> 01:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe in the sense of like Anglicans I might be comfortable</v>

01:09:00.240 --> 01:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that.</v>

01:09:01.280 --> 01:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>For Baptists typically no, and on top of it, Baptists typically don't</v>

01:09:05.440 --> 01:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have the Lord's Supper because they're often using grape juice and not</v>

01:09:08.720 --> 01:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wine, so they're disobeying God with the very thing they're doing.</v>

01:09:12.480 --> 01:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So I would not partake I would not partake.</v>

01:09:14.800 --> 01:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do believe many of them are brothers, of course, just</v>

01:09:17.280 --> 01:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that's clear.</v>

01:09:18.640 --> 01:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I just believe their brothers in error and they're in deep error</v>

01:09:21.280 --> 01:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with regard to the Lord's Supper.</v>

01:09:23.200 --> 01:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So I would recommend not participating.</v>

01:09:26.160 --> 01:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But you can certainly go and worship God with them.</v>

01:09:57.360 --> 01:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I have someone who is unimpressed with IQ studies.</v>

01:10:00.880 --> 01:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I take it up with the scientists, they are among the most</v>

01:10:05.040 --> 01:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>reproducible studies ever conducted in any field.</v>

01:10:09.520 --> 01:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Other than something like physics, where it's just the laws of the</v>

01:10:12.960 --> 01:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>universe.</v>

01:10:21.920 --> 01:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Question sixteen, I guess, is related to fifteen.</v>

01:10:24.800 --> 01:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The interjection there was not really a question.</v>

01:10:27.040 --> 01:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Question sixteen should churches return to using one common cup of wine</v>

01:10:30.560 --> 01:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and one common loaf of bread for communion.</v>

01:10:32.800 --> 01:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think that is the better symbolism.</v>

01:10:34.560 --> 01:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not required, this is adiaphorn, right?</v>

01:10:37.760 --> 01:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>This is something that is neither required nor prohibited, just like you</v>

01:10:43.120 --> 01:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>can use white wine or you can use red wine.</v>

01:10:45.600 --> 01:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Scripture does not say which wine it was.</v>

01:10:48.400 --> 01:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Is the symbolism of red wine better because it is the Lord's</v>

01:10:52.320 --> 01:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>blood? I think so.</v>

01:10:54.080 --> 01:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But there have been times where Lutheran churches have used white wine</v>

01:10:58.160 --> 01:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically as a confession against the error of other groups.</v>

01:11:02.240 --> 01:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That happened in Germany, for instance.</v>

01:11:03.840 --> 01:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll go to churches and it'll be Riesling instead of a red</v>

01:11:06.400 --> 01:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wine. Or maybe you don't have red wine, but you have white</v>

01:11:09.680 --> 01:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>wine, right?</v>

01:11:10.640 --> 01:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That's permissible.</v>

01:11:11.760 --> 01:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to be unleavened bread?</v>

01:11:13.680 --> 01:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>No, it can be leavened bread.</v>

01:11:15.200 --> 01:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to be the wafers, no, it can be a</v>

01:11:18.400 --> 01:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>common loaf.</v>

01:11:19.680 --> 01:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think insofar as the symbolism and the purpose, and it's not</v>

01:11:24.720 --> 01:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just the forgiveness of sins, it's also the unity of the church,</v>

01:11:27.600 --> 01:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly the local church body, as far as those things are concerned,</v>

01:11:30.960 --> 01:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the common cup and a common loaf are better.</v>

01:11:34.720 --> 01:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you have the, you know, broken for you, right?</v>

01:11:37.360 --> 01:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The Lord's body broken for you.</v>

01:11:38.880 --> 01:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>There's more of a symbol there when you're breaking the loaf.</v>

01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's optimal, but is it necessary?</v>

01:11:46.160 --> 01:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>No. So as we start to return to more traditional and better</v>

01:11:51.120 --> 01:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>churches, whether it's taking over existing ones or starting up a home</v>

01:11:54.720 --> 01:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>church that turns into a proper church in the sense of owning</v>

01:11:57.680 --> 01:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a building and things, I think this is probably the way to</v>

01:12:00.960 --> 01:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>go, and I think it's a a better way to do things.</v>

01:12:17.600 --> 01:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a couple more questions for this stream, I think.</v>

01:12:20.960 --> 01:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Sort of a follow-up question from the introductory monologue, I guess, about</v>

01:12:25.440 --> 01:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>China. Question seventeen.</v>

01:12:27.280 --> 01:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think Christianity ever trickled down to the masses in</v>

01:12:29.920 --> 01:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>China despite them having had two Christian leaders in the past in</v>

01:12:32.800 --> 01:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the past.</v>

01:12:35.120 --> 01:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are quite frankly a lot of reasons, but</v>

01:12:39.120 --> 01:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if I were to give say</v>

01:12:42.720 --> 01:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>three reasons, I would say that the first one is just that</v>

01:12:48.080 --> 01:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the hinterlands were never really evangelized in the same way and to</v>

01:12:53.280 --> 01:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the same extent as the coastal regions, because the Europeans dealt with</v>

01:12:57.760 --> 01:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the coastal regions because those were those were the trade cities, as</v>

01:13:00.160 --> 01:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I went over in the introduction to this the first question for</v>

01:13:03.120 --> 01:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the episode.</v>

01:13:05.040 --> 01:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say the second part would be</v>

01:13:08.800 --> 01:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that because you didn't have any of that Christianization, you never had</v>

01:13:13.920 --> 01:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>any sort of pressure for others to think about Christianity.</v>

01:13:18.880 --> 01:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have any exposure to it.</v>

01:13:20.960 --> 01:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit now because there are people who are sending</v>

01:13:23.840 --> 01:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Bibles and you know, the Chinese communist Party kind of vaguely tolerates</v>

01:13:27.840 --> 01:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Christian evangelization, although surveils you extremely heavily if you are a Christian</v>

01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>pastor there.</v>

01:13:34.720 --> 01:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And</v>

01:13:37.200 --> 01:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that the traditional their old pagan religions just had enough</v>

01:13:44.720 --> 01:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>weight that they stuck around and there was never any real</v>

01:13:49.600 --> 01:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said, no real pressure with regard to Christianity.</v>

01:13:53.600 --> 01:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you didn't have enough people converting in to build that</v>

01:13:57.600 --> 01:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>momentum to change the society.</v>

01:13:59.680 --> 01:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And then third and perhaps the most important, like I said, they</v>

01:14:03.920 --> 01:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>murdered 35,000 Chinese Christians at one point during the Boxer Rebellion.</v>

01:14:08.880 --> 01:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And then they had pogroms during the Cultural Revolution.</v>

01:14:12.880 --> 01:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And they suppressed and surveilled and sometimes just assassinated Christian pastors, communism,</v>

01:14:20.400 --> 01:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>born out of that and sort of the intellectual progeny of that</v>

01:14:24.320 --> 01:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>modulo, the Jewish involvement, of course, in the Chinese Communist Party, very</v>

01:14:29.680 --> 01:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>anti-Christian and has suppressed Christianity.</v>

01:14:32.640 --> 01:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's probably the biggest fact.</v>

01:14:34.720 --> 01:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Because if you look at the places even in Europe where you</v>

01:14:38.160 --> 01:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>had the most thorough communist Sort of destruction of traditional society</v>

01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and control over the culture, they still haven't recovered with regard to</v>

01:14:50.720 --> 01:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Christianity. Look at East Germany versus West Germany.</v>

01:14:55.440 --> 01:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Communism destroys the soul.</v>

01:14:57.680 --> 01:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is a large part of what happened in</v>

01:15:00.560 --> 01:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>China. And unfortunately, Confucianism kind of set the stage for that to</v>

01:15:05.680 --> 01:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be ushered in.</v>

01:15:16.880 --> 01:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe the final question from the chat, so let</v>

01:15:21.920 --> 01:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can pull out one last question that's not</v>

01:15:24.880 --> 01:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>too long.</v>

01:15:33.520 --> 01:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked me about data centers.</v>

01:15:36.560 --> 01:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess I uh comment on that one very briefly because it's</v>

01:15:39.360 --> 01:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a complicated topic, but I'll make this the the</v>

01:15:43.440 --> 01:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>last one for this stream.</v>

01:15:45.920 --> 01:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Add that to my Notes here.</v>

01:15:56.320 --> 01:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So the final question, what is the proper solution to these seemingly</v>

01:16:01.200 --> 01:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>out of control situation with companies buying up farms, homesteads, etc.</v>

01:16:06.720 --> 01:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to build data centers.</v>

01:16:11.120 --> 01:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Where did my</v>

01:16:15.920 --> 01:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into</v>

01:16:18.720 --> 01:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the AI topic right now, because the AI topic is not only</v>

01:16:23.120 --> 01:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>expansive, and this is question 18, I guess I should say, for</v>

01:16:27.120 --> 01:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the sake of the the record and the transcription.</v>

01:16:30.640 --> 01:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The AI topic is complicated and I don't necessarily want to get</v>

01:16:33.520 --> 01:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>into it because it will take quite a lot of time actually.</v>

01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But with regard to</v>

01:16:41.120 --> 01:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of what zoning laws, really what we're talking about in regulatory</v>

01:16:44.320 --> 01:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>law, the issue is that we just have very bad regulatory law</v>

01:16:48.160 --> 01:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and very bad zoning law, zoning law being a subset of regulatory</v>

01:16:51.680 --> 01:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>law in much of the country.</v>

01:16:53.440 --> 01:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And so they're not prepared to deal with these issues.</v>

01:16:56.960 --> 01:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the local competence because they've never dealt with it</v>

01:17:00.080 --> 01:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>before. And so</v>

01:17:03.200 --> 01:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>men who are competent, if you are in these areas, you need</v>

01:17:06.640 --> 01:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to get involved on these local boards who will oversee and hear</v>

01:17:11.120 --> 01:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>these issues.</v>

01:17:12.160 --> 01:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, excuse me, recently we have had some individuals at the state</v>

01:17:16.080 --> 01:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>level and at the national level who have been trying to address</v>

01:17:20.640 --> 01:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the issue to some degree.</v>

01:17:22.480 --> 01:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just data centers, right?</v>

01:17:24.720 --> 01:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You have massive warehouses being built.</v>

01:17:26.640 --> 01:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You have things that don't fit the location in which they are</v>

01:17:30.240 --> 01:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>built. We need to have better land use regulations so these things</v>

01:17:34.560 --> 01:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are done rationally in a way that benefits the population and not</v>

01:17:39.280 --> 01:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just these giant corporations.</v>

01:17:41.040 --> 01:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Part of this is a problem with capitalism, and if you have</v>

01:17:44.400 --> 01:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>enough money to throw at something you can generally get your way.</v>

01:17:47.360 --> 01:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is just we don't have competent men involved</v>

01:17:52.240 --> 01:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in these things any more, so it's mostly incompetent men and often</v>

01:17:55.920 --> 01:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>men who are very easily bribed You know, the kind of man</v>

01:17:59.440 --> 01:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>who can be bribed with a single nice dinner and a bar</v>

01:18:02.560 --> 01:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of scotch and a bottle of scotch, rather, is the kind of</v>

01:18:06.160 --> 01:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>man on a lot of these boards.</v>

01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't want that man in charge of the decision of saying,</v>

01:18:10.640 --> 01:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sure, you can build a data center here in the middle of</v>

01:18:13.680 --> 01:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this neighborhood or whatever it happens to be.</v>

01:18:16.320 --> 01:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So complicated issue, but it has to be solved by changing the</v>

01:18:23.200 --> 01:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>laws. Now, that's assuming that everything doesn't go sideways and things get</v>

01:18:26.720 --> 01:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>solved in a different way, but if that doesn't happen and it</v>

01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>probably will, but in the interim, it is solved by involving competent</v>

01:18:36.480 --> 01:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>moral men in the decision making process and making sure these things</v>

01:18:40.720 --> 01:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are done as they should be done.</v>

01:18:42.720 --> 01:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And from my perspective, corporations should not own giant chunks of land,</v>

01:18:48.800 --> 01:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>farms, homesteads, corporations should be absolutely banned from ow owning private residences.</v>

01:18:55.120 --> 01:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Black rock should be shattered into a million pieces and scattered to</v>

01:18:58.400 --> 01:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the winds.</v>

01:18:59.680 --> 01:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But these are very real problems and they will take time and</v>

01:19:04.640 --> 01:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort to fix because things have been allowed to</v>

01:19:07.600 --> 01:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>fester for so long.</v>

01:19:09.360 --> 01:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But get involved.</v>

01:19:11.040 --> 01:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You can probably get involved in your local, whatever it happens to</v>

01:19:16.160 --> 01:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be, zoning commission, whatever regulatory body it is, they probably have open</v>

01:19:21.840 --> 01:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>seats or very few people vote for the position and maybe you,</v>

01:19:26.160 --> 01:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>your family and like your cousins could get you elected That's the</v>

01:19:29.680 --> 01:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>case in a lot of places.</v>

01:19:30.960 --> 01:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So get involved because at the local level, you can do a</v>

01:19:35.280 --> 01:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lot. Maybe you can't get elected to the state level at the</v>

01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>national level.</v>

01:19:38.560 --> 01:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone always focuses on that.</v>

01:19:40.160 --> 01:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, the people making a lot of decisions that</v>

01:19:43.200 --> 01:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>affect your everyday life are probably fifteen minutes down the road.</v>

01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So you can get involved and you can do a lot of</v>

01:19:50.240 --> 01:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>good for your neighbor.</v>

01:19:51.360 --> 01:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Christians should absolutely be involved in these things in making sure that</v>

01:19:54.400 --> 01:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they are being done in a way that is consonant with morality</v>

01:19:58.080 --> 01:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and consonant with what is best for your neighbor.</v>

01:20:00.480 --> 01:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the ways you can serve your neighbor in</v>

01:20:02.640 --> 01:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a very concrete way.</v>

01:20:04.320 --> 01:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the short version of how to deal with</v>

01:20:08.720 --> 01:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that issue and what's going on.</v>

01:20:11.520 --> 01:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that will be it for</v>

01:20:14.960 --> 01:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this week.</v>

01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I see there are a couple more questions that have come in</v>

01:20:19.040 --> 01:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the chat, I will copy those over so that I don't</v>

01:20:22.800 --> 01:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>miss them.</v>

01:20:25.680 --> 01:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But as always, thank you for submitting questions and for participating in</v>

01:20:31.280 --> 01:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the chat.</v>

01:20:32.800 --> 01:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>If I did not get to your question or I missed your</v>

01:20:35.440 --> 01:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>question, which is entirely possible, please go ahead and submit that on</v>

01:20:39.840 --> 01:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the forum.</v>

01:20:40.400 --> 01:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The forum is always the best way because I can mark those</v>

01:20:43.600 --> 01:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as having been answered and I have a record of them in</v>

01:20:46.480 --> 01:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that is not subject to whatever YouTube decides to do</v>

01:20:51.360 --> 01:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with the stream comments and things like that.</v>

01:20:55.040 --> 01:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can submit the questions any of a number of different</v>

01:20:58.800 --> 01:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>ways on X in reply to say the stream during the stream</v>

01:21:04.320 --> 01:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in the chat, Telegram, or again, forum is the preferred way to</v>

01:21:09.200 --> 01:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>do it.</v>

01:21:10.400 --> 01:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, it is Friday.</v>

01:21:12.320 --> 01:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I try to do these on Thursday or Friday, just depends on</v>

01:21:14.720 --> 01:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>how my week goes.</v>

01:21:15.920 --> 01:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Usually winds up being Friday, that's just the reality of it these</v>

01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>days. But given that it's Friday, go out and enjoy your weekend.</v>

01:21:23.600 --> 01:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Try to spend some time outside if it's not too unbearably hot</v>

01:21:27.280 --> 01:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>where you are and there's not a bear in your front yard,</v>

01:21:30.080 --> 01:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>as apparently happens around me a lot now.</v>

01:21:32.800 --> 01:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, I always enjoy giving answers to these questions and</v>

01:21:37.440 --> 01:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I will see you all next week.</v>

01:21:39.360 --> 01:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Go to church on Sunday and until then, God bless you</v>

01:21:43.600 --> 01:21:44.240
all.